Resisting State Religion Part II — Republican Satanism

In the same vein as the Holocaust religion, and in fairness, we should also object to the Republican Party’s sneaky conversion to Satanism. Satanism? Not that there’s anything wrong with that, but it violates the church/state clause.

The Republican logo was redesigned around 2002-2003. Here’s the old Republican logo before they openly converted to Satanism:

pre-Satan GOP logo

Here’s the current Republican logo:

GOP SATAN

In witchcraft the Pentagram is used with the “head” of the star pointed down, illustrating man worshiping Satan. When pointed down it also becomes the face of the goat. Satanists use a pentagram with two points up, often inscribed in a double circle to emphasize the exclusion of God, and sometimes with the head of a goat inside the pentagram.

Don’t believe me? Take a look at this bit of religious artwork:

Baphomet

Talking about Republican Satanism is a good way to calm a knee jerk reaction to Holocaust re-orienting.

America was founded on religious freedom. Defending this ground is pretty darn mainstream.

37 Comments

  1. I heard this on NPR while driving home this afternnon:
    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=122494341

    Where does NPR get off wasting taxpayer money turning out puff pieces about the new multicultural music that celebrates and emerging “new national identity” in Britain? Virtually every human interest or arts & culture piece done by NPR or the msm promotes multiculturalism. How about, for just once, doing a piece about how Britons feel about the creation of a “new national identity” thru mass immigration that occurs without the public’s consent. Would NPR even dare to do a neutral piece about the BNP and the concerns of its members?

  2. Yep. I just heard Jerry Falwell on the radio and he says that California will drop into the ocean because little Teddy Olson has decide to become a homosexual, and is calling himself a conservative homosexual.

    The end is near.

  3. I do hope some law firm out there sues over Holocaust propaganda in schools and attacking that has more popular appeal than revisionism.

    But I really do not understand this. What “non-satanic” reasons are there for changing the GOP logo? Somebody’s graphics design firm needed work to do? It hardly changes the aesthetics of the logo, and of course your comparison of it to satanism is exactly the kind of “meme” that would get spread around the Christian circles who vote GOP.

    Anybody have an answer? First, why bother changing it, and second, why this particular change?

  4. WP I think this is what that old Grimoire character called “occult warfare” or what most of us would just call psychological warfare. It’s the same thing as how Jews finance ugly degenerate art.

    Posts like this change the “framing” of an issue, I assume that was Kiev’s point.

  5. No, it’s not a facetious post.

    Religion matters, and ultimately our struggle is a religious one. Not because we are religious, but our enemies are deeply religious.

    We need to call a spade a spade. We need to take the fight, where the fight is.

    We need not advocate a religion; but we should point out when a religious viewpoint is being unconstitutionally foisted upon us.

    I think it’s reasonable to argue that the Republicans are being offensive in using a religious symbol in their logo. There would be outcries if they were using a Christian cross.

    If any Republican push-pollers call me, I’m going to tell them I’m offended by the Satan symbol on their elephant logo. I’m going to tell my Christian-right relatives that their beloved Republican politicians are devil worshippers.

    As far as Jenna Bush — I’m sure she believes she is a Christian. These people don’t see Christianity and their Masonic-Satanism as in conflict. Not at all.

  6. “I’m going to tell my Christian-right relatives that their beloved Republican politicians are devil worshippers.”

    What the? You can’t be serious…spouting rhetoric like that only makes people on our side seem even more loopy to the general populace.

    We ought to stick to the verifiable biological-racial facts and not get lost in this obscure mystical arcana about Masonry, Satanism, occultism, etc — perhaps there is an occult or mystical significance as what is currently occurring, but all of that is far beyond the minds of most people. For now let us stick to what we can expose and change and save the rest for later on.

  7. WP, the target of this meme are people who are Christians. It hardly makes a difference if they “believe” that the GOP is run by crypto-satanic Masons, but the next time they see the new GOP logo, with it’s upside down Satan Stars, they are going to experience a psychological reaction that’s the opposite of what the logo designers were hoping for (unless they really are satanists of course)

    The target of this meme is not you obviously, and your reaction to this post is expected. You can be dismissed from this particular exercise if you wish 🙂

    If you can change the meaning of the GOP elephant to be “satanic” than you can change the meaning of “The Holocaust” using similar techniques. It’s like turning a cross upside down and it’s done to white people’s symbols all the time. See the Negative Totems article over at TOO.

    I find it inspiring myself. It’s like symbol hijacking.

  8. So, the next time I hear about “The Holocaust” I’m going to say I don’t subscribe to that particular religion and find it as creepy as Satanism. Religion, whether The Holocaust or Masono-Satanism, don’t belong in public schools or on Republican logos.

    They are actually suing to have crosses removed from public areas, yet they are allowed the have Official US Holocaust Museums and teach it as official doctrine in public schools? I’m no lawyer but I’d say they have a case.

    I’ll leave the question of whether The Holocaust is real, or if Republicans are actually Devil-Worshipping Satanists, for someone else. Just keep your religious symbols out of the school and government.

  9. I never noticed that. I did a google search just now for “republican elephant” and “democrat donkey.” I notice that most of the elephants’ stars are pointing down, while the donkeys’ stars are pointing up. Interessant.

    Of course, if you were to point out this little oddity to a regular RedTeam fan you would obtain instant kook status.

  10. Is Hunter going to do something about Kievsky spamming these stupid posts?

    ????

    This is a great post. Very thought-provoking. I can’t think of any legitimate reason for the change.

  11. I’ll leave the question of whether The Holocaust is real, or if Republicans are actually Devil-Worshipping Satanists, for someone else. Just keep your religious symbols out of the school and government.

    Hear, hear.

  12. If Occidental Dissent’s mission is to attract intellectuals and professionals as HW has said, posts like this one aren’t the way to do it. But it’s fine if you want guys in tinfoil hats who live in their mothers’ basements.

  13. I’m with WP here, this post of Kievsky’s is definitely a miss.

    Come on guys, effective propaganda (counter or otherwise) has to be subtle and subversive. Kievsky’s portrayal of the Republican party as a hotbed of satanism strikes me as being ridiculous and the exact opposite of subtle.

  14. I had never noticed that. It doesn’t interest me in the slightest, but it might be a talking point worth distributing among fundamentalist Christians. I see AiG material posted all the time at Free Republic. The people who vote for the GOP are the ones who read the Left Behind books.

  15. I welcome you to try your strategy under the banner of a white nationalist movement.

    But speaking as an individual, my personal impression of all religious people is that they belong in mental institutions. I’ll definitely continue to slam religion elsewhere.

  16. notuswind “Kievsky’s portrayal of the Republican party as a hotbed of satanism strikes me as being ridiculous and the exact opposite of subtle.”

    OK, what do you think about the Democratic party being a hotbed of The Holocaust religion – does that strike you as “ridiculous and the exact opposite of subtle?” Have you visited the Holocaust Temple in Washington DC? What did you think?

  17. I fail to see the connection between this logo and the Holocaust.

    This is the kind of gimmicky silliness that we don’t need.

    I come to OC because I want to read serious analysis of politics, media and culture from a pro-white perspective. I’m not interested in quirky little “isn’t this interesting” type posts.

    The link that Soren Renner posted is one of the stupidest, most ridiculous things that I have ever read in my life.

  18. ATBOTL do your daughters watch “Lady Gaga”?

    Do you think “Lady Gaga” is “gimmicky silliness”?

    It’s poison, you just don’t see it. There are millions of dollars behind “Lady Gaga” – are millions of dollars “gimmicky silliness”?

    You tell me.

  19. Lady Gaga is poisonous because pop music is poisonous: consumerist, hedonistic, lacking higher aesthetic value, conceptually impoverished, not compelling intellectually, a product tailor-made for the self-indulgent youth.

    In order to realize this, one does not need to postulate satanist freemasons or zionist reptilian shapeshifting Illuminati controlling the entertainment industry. The obscurantist mindset of Alex Jones and David Icke is firmly against the Western epistemic values of plausibility, coherence and simplicity.

  20. Naturalist:

    “firmly against the Western epistemic values of plausibility, coherence and simplicity.”

    Fair enough. Who did 911? The Muslims with the boxcutters? And NORAD and all?

  21. “Lady Gaga” promotes interracial homosexual sex. Just for the record. Is that just “consumerism”? You tell me.

  22. I’m going to show my daughter the link Soren sent me about Lady Gaga, with all the mind control symbolism. I have not been able to shut out all pop culture from her life, so I think the next best thing is for her to know what is going on with these celebrities and pop culture figures.

    Psy-Ops are being done to us. I think it’s fair game to point it out and make people suspicious of “celebrities” and “public figures.”

    I really think this is how we can get through to the Christians, too. The Republicans are handing them to us on a silver platter with their downward pointing Pentagram.

    We are in favor of transparency and a clear wall of separation between religious institutions/cults and the State.

  23. A person who prides himself on his logic and reasoning ability might think religious people are crazy, but just the same he must respect and understand their beliefs if he is to convert them. People are not rational beings and most of our conversion targets are religious to some degree. By dismissing religion out of hand, one ignores a huge chunk of Western tradition, history, motivation, cause-and-effect, et cetera.

    Although I agree that going in deep on religious conspiracy topics is not right for OD, I also think it is good for us to be aware of the issues, which can be discussed rationally and scientifically, if it pleaseth the court, in order to remove the Alex Jones “feel.”

  24. Obama staffer wants ‘cognitive infiltration’ of 9/11 conspiracy groups
    http://rawstory.com/2010/01/obama-staffer-infiltration-911-groups/

    By Daniel Tencer
    Wednesday, January 13th, 2010 — 10:48 pm

    In a 2008 academic paper, President Barack Obama’s appointee to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs advocated “cognitive infiltration” of groups that advocate “conspiracy theories” like the ones surrounding 9/11.

    Cass Sunstein, a Harvard law professor, co-wrote an academic article entitled “Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures,” in which he argued that the government should stealthily infiltrate groups that pose alternative theories on historical events via “chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine” those groups.

    As head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Sunstein is in charge of “overseeing policies relating to privacy, information quality, and statistical programs,” according to the White House Web site.

  25. Cass Sunstein thinks they are going to pay federal salaries to come tell us we’re full of shit and they know better? Now that’s Chutzpah with a Brass Band!

    They have already got their mind control apparatus in place in the form of television. The people who cannot be reached via TV and movies, will not be reached by Cass’s Commissars. I guess he’s going to have to learn what the Red Guard knew, only death will cure us of suspicion of people like him.

  26. Lady Gaga (Italian) styles herself as the new Madonna. She said she dyes her hair blonde because people mistake her for Amy Winehouse (Jew). She says she wants to “revolutionize” pop music. Like Madonna, Gaga is very pro-homosexual and is bisexual.

    One of her more popular songs: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5Xq51eLJ94.

  27. Lady Gaga is poisonous because pop music is poisonous: consumerist, hedonistic, lacking higher aesthetic value, conceptually impoverished, not compelling intellectually, a product tailor-made for the self-indulgent youth.

    Not all of it. Many post-punk and new school punk bands went art rock, grew up and started drifting to the right. Not all of ’em, but some of them.

    Pop music is important. More than that, it shapes the psyche of the youth. It informs and molds human beings. People killed a lot of people while whistling La Marseillaise.

    Anybody in New England that wants to start a band with me?

Comments are closed.