A classic White nationalist essay from 1995:
The Fate of Northernkind
by Charles L. Carroll, Jr.
Last week I stopped to fill my fuel tank at a self-service gas station. As I waited for my tank to fill, I noticed a young redhead who was also filling her tank. Her alabaster skin, sprinkling of freckles, green eyes and upturned nose were good indications that her hair color was natural. That made her a rare individual. Each generation, natural blondes and natural redheads are becoming fewer in number. Not all White people are blondes or redheads — I’m not, for example — but they represent something special about our race and our heritage, and are among the most envied people on earth. To prove my point, just think of all the hair dye bought and used by women to make themselves more attractive. How many brunettes dye their hair blonde or red? There is something instinctive about this tropism toward fairness. The basic instincts which have helped to shape our species operate on a sub-rational level. We may not be consciously aware of this special attraction, but it exists.
All of these thoughts brought to mind a book that I have been reading, Ascent of the Mind by William H. Calvin. It’s a scholarly interpretation of the effects of the ice ages on the intellectual development of our race. The human brain has increased in size by a factor of four in the last 2.5 million years. This rapid rate of development is almost unheard of in nature. Dr. Calvin makes an excellent argument that this increase in cranial size is due primarily to the ice ages. The ice ages occurred in cycles. We experience spring, summer, fall and winter every year. The ice ages cycled every 100,000 years with smaller ice ages every 10,000 years. When the two cycles coincided, the glaciers covered most of the European continent, the cradle of our people. Life was extremely difficult for early European man during those periods. Only the most fit–and the most intelligent–survived those harsh times. The weak and the mentally incompetent perished in the limitless ice and snow. The ability to plan ahead demanded self-denial in the summer in order to ensure survival during the long, bleak winters. Those who could work together for the common good also increased their odds for survival. This, in time, developed into a social order that is as much instinctual as it is learned. Another thing that happened was that our appearance changed. As our brains got larger, our jaws receded and our forehead became nearly vertical instead of sloping. Our skin became nearly white, and our hair and eyes became lighter. Whiteness in Nature, of course, is the great signifier of the North, of the creatures which developed in the harshness of the ice and snow. We carry this mark of the North. We instinctively associate these qualities of appearance with nobility, character, and intelligence–and our instincts are right.
In between the ice ages, times were good, the glaciers receded, food was plentiful, and mankind flourished. These boom times lasted hundreds of generations. European man increased in both number and diversity. New variations of Caucasians came into being. During the next ice age a great winnowing process took place. The new variations not worthy of survival became extinct, while improved variations increased. This cycle of events was repeated every 10,000 years for the past 2.5 million years. We, the descendants of those European peoples, are the result of that natural selection process. The young redhead at the gas station was truly a beautiful work of Nature and, if you will, Nature’s God.
By this time, the young lady had finished filling her tank. She opened her passenger door and retrieved her baby from its car seat. Only now was I able to see her toddler as she carried it in to pay for the gas. After my previous thoughts, I was unprepared for what I saw. Emotions washed over me: shock, anger, disgust, and sorrow! The baby she carried had brown skin and black, kinky hair.
It wasn’t the first time that I had seen a White girl with a dark baby. Unfortunately, these days, it is a common sight. All too common! What made this time especially disturbing to me was the fact that I had, only seconds before, been thinking about how this beautiful young woman represented one of Nature’s greatest achievements.
We now know that the African continent did not suffer through the ice ages as Europe did. Therefore, the indigenous peoples of Africa did not experience the same development. Survival in Africa depended on a different set of criteria. It was not necessary to use forethought or long-term planning to survive, so those traits were never well-developed. It was beneficial to make the most of any unexpected opportunity, hence the trait for impulsive acts. The African continent has always had swift predators, hence the traits for speed and agility. Disease, much more common in the steaming tropics than in the cold north, made life short, hence the high rate of reproduction. The Black race still has these traits today. The gene for sickle cell anemia, another trait developed in Africa, actually is a survival advantage where malaria is common. The author of Ascent of the Mind, however, never mentioned what should have been an obvious conclusion. The fact that Blacks evolved in a radically different environment and are therefore a radically different kind of human is a Politically Incorrect conclusion. Does accepting this truth mean that we should hate Blacks? No, but not accepting this truth and acting as though the races are equal will lead to the death and extinction of our people.
The psychological differences between Blacks and Whites are as pronounced as the differences in skin color. Intellectually, the differences are easily measured. The average White has an IQ of 100, while the average Black has an IQ of only 85. A higher IQ simply was not necessary for survival in Africa. More importantly, the percentage of the very intelligent, those people who are our natural leaders, thinkers, and inventors, those upon whom the future of our society depends, is hundreds of times greater among Whites than among Blacks. Racial mixing can easily wipe out the class of people who create and sustain civilization in just a few generations. It has happened before.
What about the young redhead? Was what she had done as wrong as I thought it was? Television, movies and even our tax-supported educational institutions promote racial mixing. As a college instructor, I am well aware of the social pressure on young White people. Black males are only following their natural animal instincts when they try to mate with as many females as possible. Young White girls, especially blondes and redheads, are their most desired prey. When a Black male flatters a White female, and she has not been sufficiently indoctrinated into racial mixing, she will reject his sexual advances. Most Black males have learned that if all else fails, to ask, What’s the matter, are you prejudiced? They have found that young, educated White girls want to be fashionable. It is not fashionable to be prejudiced. Her TV, her teachers, her newspapers, her magazines, her music and maybe even her pastor teach her that to be prejudiced is just possibly the worst thing she could ever be. Probably that is what happened to the young redhead.
The dark-skinned, flat-nosed, kinky-haired baby represented a backward step for the European race, a backward step of hundreds of thousands of years, a backward step into a chasm with no bottom save the endless darkness of death. It may have been the redhead’s life, it may have been her body, and it may have been her baby–but it was my race that she was destroying. She had betrayed every ancestor who had struggled for survival against overwhelming odds so that their children and their grandchildren and their great-grandchildren, through all the ages could advance and prosper. Instead of further advancement, she had chosen to become an evolutionary dead end. I fear that she and other unthinking White females like her may be responsible for the extinction of our race and the end–the literal end for all time–of everything we hold dear and sacred in this world.
Preventing that from happening is what this program is all about. That is why we are here every week, taking the chances that every one of you who bothers to think about it knows we are taking. That is why everyone associated with National Vanguard Books and the National Alliance has given up something, some of us quite a bit, to do everything we can to bring the truth to our people.
Preference for neoteny, fair pigmentation and youthfulness, especially in females is a natural instinct. This also led to larger brains.
Even within darker races they prefer lighter-skinned women for this reason. This is overlooked in psychological studies of why children prefer the lighter-skinned doll. They falsely assume it’s learned bias from a Eurocentric and racist society and media.
Good Morning Sunshine……Kievsky
A dramatic moment in the most important novel ever written is the dilemma the central character had to face when he had to kill a young white girl coming with black gangs who discovered the base (the revolutionaries killed all the blacks but the girl escaped and ran toward the highway in the midnight). He had to shoot her.
Later in the novel many other white girls who had defiled their race died in The Day of the Rope, and the novel’s author dedicated another of his books to a serial killer who targeted mixed couples… in real life!
A delicate redhead girl of English ancestry was my Platonic love when I was much younger. She inspired me to write a couple of posts in my blog about the “crown of evolution.” Nowadays, when I see an Aryan redhead with a naco here in Mexico (Iberian whites use the word “naco” to refer to slightly mestisized Indians, just as whites use “nigger” in the U.S.) I feel that my world falls apart. It’s the sin against the holy ghost par excellence, and I am afraid to say that it cannot be forgiven.
Alas, if The Day of the Rope arrived during my lifespan, would I have the moral toughness to bring those beloved creatures to justice…?
Mark: “They falsely assume it’s learned bias from a Eurocentric and racist society and media.”
An irony I noticed is that recent surveys demonstrated a stronger Black desire for lighter (White) complexions in racially integrated schools/societies than segregated ones.
This ironically contradicts the doll test which was used to ban school segregation in Brown v. Board of Education.
A very good racial article by Charles Carroll. Not to knock all ‘red heads’ by any measure, yet, I have noticed a proclivity by many of them to liberalism and race denial. Many of the females, especially, have an obstinate, atavistic tendency to mate with genetically darker ethnic elements. Could this be an “opposites attract” syndrome, or perhaps an aberrant psychological allele at work?
They are reverse watermelons- red outside, green inside.
Junghans,
The Redheads in their Celtic Homelands have actually tended toward Racial Conservatism (at least for Celts).
The SNP, for example, have fought hard to keep Non-Europeans out of Scotland.
And unlike the BNP, the SNP actually has real clout and power in the Country that birthed them.
I don’t think there could be something genetic here.
Every time I see an article like this, I am always left with one question:
What are you going to DO about it?
“Many of the females, especially, have an obstinate, atavistic tendency to mate with genetically darker ethnic elements. ”
It’s not aberrant. It’s Woman seeking a strong Man. The men of her own race are taking it easy, so she goes looking for something more visibly masculine. Any regular Roissy reader will understand exactly what is going on.
“The SNP, for example, have fought hard to keep Non-Europeans out of Scotland.”
No. Not even close. The SNP is a leftist, multi-racial, anti-white party. Where did you get the idea that they weren’t? Did you just assume it from the name?
Thanks for the feedback, Reginald. I was just speculating about my personal anecdotal observations in Amerika. I know there are ‘red heads’ who certainly don’t fit that stereotype.
I’ve noticed that the population has changed over the past 30 years with fewer blondes and redheads. I can remember long ago being in crowds of people and noticing the tops of their heads would look like autumn leaves. You don’t see that so much anymore. It’s not just the hair color and eyes either. People’s features are changing too and not for the better. I’ve noticed faces are becoming less distinct and more homogenized than my generation. I can open up a yearbook and see faces that were once common but no longer. The pollution of our gene pool is so pronounced nowadays you can almost pick out Whites who are European, Canadian, Australian, etc. from American ones. I firmly believe this is why Whites in this country are in decline politically, socially and economically. A White Nationalist movement is fine but if we don’t protect our genetic stock by instituting an eugenics program and/or storing eggs/sperm for invitro-fertilization, there won’t be any real Whites left in this country in a few generations to preserve.
I’ve noticed that the population has changed over the past 30 years with fewer blondes and redheads. I can remember long ago being in crowds of people and noticing the tops of their heads would look like autumn leaves. You don’t see that so much anymore. It’s not just the hair color and eyes either. People’s features are changing too and not for the better.
Well said, Chad, a sensible voice against the proletarian mob.
It’s even worse when you consider the blondes and redheads you do see are typically cosmetically enhanced.
Nordish men and women need to become more conscious of themselves and marry appropriately.
It’s not aberrant. It’s Woman seeking a strong Man. The men of her own race are taking it easy, so she goes looking for something more visibly masculine. Any regular Roissy reader will understand exactly what is going on.
No. White women do not prefer non-white men. Statistics clearly show that white women (and white men) date, marry, and have children with non-whites at rates much lower than if they selected mates randomly. Both white women and white men, far from showing a preference for non-whites, display an aversion to mating with non-whites. White nationalists (and anyone else) who claim white women display a preference for non-whites are incorrect.
One reason some white nationalists overestimate the degree of miscegenation might be that their disgust when seeing mixed-race couples causes them to remember these instances more strongly, while they tend to forget about the white couples they see because these couples do not induce such strong feelings. Statistics are important in order to correct errors or biases in perception.
There will inevitably be miscegenation is a mixed-race society. Over the long run even low rates of mixing will lead to mongrelization and racial destruction. This is why racial separation and ethnostates are essential and necessary for racial preservation.
Should be “There will inevitably be miscegenation in a mixed-race society. “
http://racehist.blogspot.com/2010/02/reply-to-inconsequential-post-by-guy.html
Here is a post on negrophilia and people who obsess about supposed rampant miscegenation by Northern European women.
Reg Thompson – The SNP, for example, have fought hard to keep Non-Europeans out of Scotland.
What this SNP?
http://www.snp.org/node/15439
http://www.snp.org/node/8374
http://www.snp.org/node/16617
http://www.snp.org/node/10603
Thats just a random trawl of their website. If thats fighting hard I wonder what surrender would look like.
Its true they have talked about Scotland having more of skills/points based system in the manner of Australia. Thats unworkable tied to the UK and its open door policy. However an ‘independant’ Scotalnd as the SNP see it would be a bitch of the EU and thus with no power to control immigration in that context either.
An awesome essay by Carroll. As a HardRightist, I don’t wany the government or any other Authority deciding who mates with whom. As a WN, I have to fight the Urge to Kill every time I see a white women with a black or a latino. This is a big problem for me; for the time being, I’ll just keep watching Mexican soap operas: one (fake) blond babe after another…
Why do some of my comments await moderation and others simply disappear into the ether?
And others, like the above, publish without a problem?
The media is responsible for making miscegenation more of a problem than it really is. They run advertisements with mixed race couples or show some movie with mudsharks and negros and it hypnotizes your mind into believing it’s common when in fact it’s not. When you actually see one in public it confirms in your mind that it’s true.
Right now the MSM is running a media blitz pitying all the single black women that can’t find husbands and urging them to date outside of their race with their target being White men, of course. I’ve noticed it’s accompanied by an increase in commercials and other advertising showing White men and black women together in different situations.
Out in public I’ve seen two White male/black female couples out shopping together. I honestly think there’s some kind of leftist anti-racist theatre troupe that goes around to different cities and towns to parade around these bizarre couples. The White men were of above average stock as if they worked as models and the black women were ugly and thick waisted. It was so surreal to watch, like seeing Nell Carter with a young Robert Redford. These were the kind of guys who could have any woman they wanted and they settled for that? That’s why I think it’s some kind of put on.
Under the toxic “hard right” philosophy, it’s just fine to lust for a complete bloodbath, race war, class war, and the death of millions of people; but race is unimportant (seadragonconquerer and CompassionateFascist trivialized race by dismissing it as mere “skin pigment” and “skin color”; building an anti-Jewish rainbow coalition is their goal), we can’t have an ethnostate (seadragonconquerer called the ethnostate an “albino bantustan”; CompassionateFascist called it a “bantustan”), and we can’t even outlaw miscegenation.
That’s right, MGLS. The abiding principal of Operational Nationalism is this: first, Win. Do whatever is necessary to render harmless that peculiar nomadic tribe that is determined to gulag humanity, destroy Western Civilization, and massacre the White Race. Manuver. Compromise. Fight on multiple fronts. Be willing to discard today’s friend, and align with yesterday’s enemy. Then, when we win, sort out the other – no doubt vastly important – issues. And lurker: You are not alone. At certain other realist sites – zerohedge, dailybell – all of my posts “disappear into the ether”.
Personally, I believe that all genetically fit Whites who have mated with Darks should be compelled to produce some fully White offspring for adoption before being sterilized. That’s maybe a hard line for some, but it takes care of two related problems. It limits the number of half-Whites and it increases the number of Whites. There is no more right to pollute the gene pool than there is to poison a well. White society has a claim on every White who benefits from our society. If you want to the right to be a mudshark, move to the woods and live without the White Man’s electricity and canned food.
Reginald probably came up with his idiocy about the SNP due to his desire to insult the English (and “WASPs” worldwide). (It also goes along with his attempt to drive wedges between Northern Europeans in order to advance his Mediterranean interests.) He figured saying that anti-immigration, pro-white parties are much more powerful in Scotland than England would be a good way to do this.
‘naco’…i like that word…ha…hahaha…hahahahahaha
Statistics clearly show that white women (and white men) date, marry, and have children with non-whites at rates much lower than if they selected mates randomly. Both white women and white men, far from showing a preference for non-whites, display an aversion to mating with non-whites. White nationalists (and anyone else) who claim white women display a preference for non-whites are incorrect.
Indeed, and even the ones who make the mistake and produce a mixed offspring regret it later. I’ve known of a few White women that wanted to marry a White man but couldn’t because they had a mulatto child. One was even a White nationalist, surprising. Way too late for that!
White women have to deal with the results of their racial sins more than White men do, as White men can miscegenate and leave their mixed child with the non-White mother, like Glenn Miller did.
April Gaede:
Ron, with White men like Glen Miller and Will Williams (your two buddies) as examples of bravery, our race is not worth much. Both of these men have admitted having sex with underage Asian girls in brothels, one gets government money for being declared insane, the other abandoned his half-Asian child and was in the witness protection plan for testifying in court against members of the Order after he accepted money from them.
I read something by an English guy a while ago complaining that the SNP work behind the scenes to divert refugees from Scotland and to England.
Maybe it was just sour grapes on his part, though, with him trying to blame Scots for the immigration situation in the UK. (Also, he seemed like a Tory, and he could’ve been biased against the Celts due to them almost never voting Tory.)
In any event my main point that the more Redheaded Scots have been to the right of the English on immigration is correct, it appears, given that in 2006-2007 England had 6.5 times more Non-Whites than Scotland had.
England % Non-White (2007): 11.80%
Scotland % Non-White (2006): 1.81%
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_England_from_the_2001_United_Kingdom_census
Now there could be other factors partly explaining this other than the Scots averaging out to being better racial preservationists than the English.
But the margin is so large that I tend to think there’s a reflection of diverging national attitudes to be found in it.
“White women do not prefer non-white men.”
In a normal situation, this is true. I know a lot of white men that don’t deserve the name of man. In part because they don’t have the foggiest idea how to BE a man – they see the wimps on Seinfeld and Friends and that utter loser in “Meet the Parents” and think that’s what they should be like, because the current culture doesn’t present them with any other models.
That women don’t _prefer_ men of other races does not invalidate that the ones that _do_ choose men of other races do so to seek masculinity they are not finding among their own.
People shouldn’t spend so much time worrying about White liberals breeding with non-Whites. I say get it over with and miscegenate yourself into oblivion so we can take our country back. Your colored offspring will lack the intelligence or ability to confront us and your pet projects like global warming, abortion and radical feminism will die out along with your lineage.
I’ve stopped counting the number of blondes and redheads I’ve seen racemixing.
Two standout: a 14 year old redhead, just beautiful little girl, with her mestizo bf, now the White father is on the stoop of the home and as the couple are walking, perhaps 35 feet from house IN FULL VIEW of the father: the metizo gives her a hard smack to the face, the father does nothing and the white girl hugs the mestizo even harder.
Then a 17 year old redhead, VERY pretty, in a mall just gazing in rapt adoration at her mestizo banger bf, whose SKIN was so full of acne and oozing pustules that I almost gagged.
This is DARWINISM in action.
The evolution of the White race has to have those UNSUITED to the future go the way of miscengenation and into oblivion.
This is one of the best essays I ever read. Thank you for re-posting it. Essays like this are why I joined the National Alliance many years ago. But it is potentially so much worse than even the cataclysm the author so eloquently points out..
Blacks in Africa have a pattern which ELIMINATES our pattern over time — in fact, it probably got that way partly in OPPOSITION to traits just like the ones we developed way up north. So many times the pull of certain niches favors certain patterns and traits over others. Blind cave fish arose because eyes are a disadvantage in caves– as is a nose straight on top of your head to mammals in general, unless you are a dolphin. So what I am pointing out is that blacks are the anti-whites. Like cheetahs with their speed developed against the also agile and swift gazelle. That is why they are not like us — they cannot be because of their OWN patterns, their OWN choices through time. They are a whole pattern for a whole purpose that self-selects. Their ideals are different too, so is their destiny.
Think about it — if one white person marked by planning ahead, higher time-preference (i.e. choosing larger rewards later rather than smaller rewards now, blacks are the opposite of us), industrious building and long-term farming, and the accumulation of resources to go with all these types of things lives in the middle of Africa He and his genes will not last long. He will accumulate wealth, dig a well, store grain to grow crops, build buildings for your livestock, limit your child-rearing to fit potential bad years, invent writing, read, build a library etc… all to better do his long-term strategies.
HOWEVER, your neighbors have casual sex all day (why aids is rampant in Africa according to researchers who actually thought that was an actual question), engage in heinous deadly casual violence over food and mates etc., take whatever food they can get, roam around looking for food and build crude huts near food (near you…). One day there is a drought and a famine. Now you are surrounded by hundreds or thousands of impulsive, easy to anger, hard to calm down, violent neighbors who are starving, thirsty, and can see you have food and water just sitting there. Now you are going to find out how evolution selected them to be that way–against people with YOUR way! The sword could never be pulled out of the stone in Africa because of this – they could not become like us.
Unique circumstances in Europe brought these higher traits out of us as whites and added more later — after we LEFT Africa. Maybe we were chased from one end of Africa to the other and finally escaped… with our seed genes already primed for planning in the north. A white flight as we see today from our cities… According to the mathematics of evolution, our type of genes have a chance to arise randomly from time-to-time in Africa. Disadvantagous genes are always rapidly eliminated, let alone ever spreading.
Our racial psychologies tell us a lot about the socio-political environments our minds developed in. OUR way was helped along for thousands of years by laws and morality with death as the penalty while in Africa killing each other is the way they settle disputes. Some areas of Africa, when they actually counted the deaths, had death-rates much higher than even our innner-cities and even higher than with the great Jewish-inspired brother wars of Europe last century!! Over thousands of years, even if we mixed, our genes would be a great liability — especially if we mixed, actually (and that is inevitable). Our genes would be rapidly eliminated because they would paint a big target on your back–the same target that the farmers in Zimbabwe and south Africa have on them, the same one that whites in black neighborhoods have on them. They are BUILT by nature to destroy US eventually without there knowledge or consent in the here-and-now. So many other studies support this as well… so lower IQ is an advantage in Africa too (but not too low). Their higher fecundity (rate of offspring production) ALONE would wipe our less fecund genes out over time in a non-stressed environ. They are the face of our extinction.
Our women are not selected to go against the grain. They are highly adept learners — as the majority of women in colleges show — and excellent teachers. They are not rebels, explorers, or leaders of revolutions. When society (evolution assumes this society is US as white males as it has been in our past evolution, not Jews with ulterior motives and mass-media control) tells them that the worst thing they can be is “racist” – a term as fake and political as the communist mouth (Trotsky) that invented it — they trust and they sacrifice to conform and to teach the next generation what authority tells them is important. Too bad that authority is not US. White males are letting them down. Be mad at yourself for that, at our ancestors… but not too mad, the mass-media blind-sided us. We just need to have the attitude that we need to fix this mess!
Reginald probably came up with his idiocy about the SNP due to his desire to insult the English (and “WASPs” worldwide). (It also goes along with his attempt to drive wedges between Northern Europeans in order to advance his Mediterranean interests.) He figured saying that anti-immigration, pro-white parties are much more powerful in Scotland than England would be a good way to do this. – MGLS
—-
MGLS,
I must say, you have some imagination there when you come up with these memes in your stereotyping anti-‘Med’ ‘crusade’.
Let me tell you something, if it was anybody or any group who attempted, successfully no less, in driving wedges between Northern Europeans to advance particularistic interests it certainly was the English/British themselves — ultimately shooting themselves in the foot for their jealous desire not to see any other European nation(s) rivaling, or worse, besting them in fair and open competition — either militarily or, especially, in the commercial market sphere.
If you don’t wish to take my word for it, maybe you’ll take Wilmot Robertson’s:
Good essay. Thanks for posting it.
As a light-skinned blue eyed barbarossa with fair flaxen hair, I can definitely say that we are indeed a waning breed. What a shame.
And this very harsh Southern sun and incessant heat ain’t helping us fair skinned reds too much either. Very fair people are harmed by too strong UV radiation, as strong solar rays actually damages the DNA – http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/content/abstract/16/1/45 – and the more fair you are the worse it harms you: this is why White colonization/settlement has failed time and time again in equatorial regions, and probably a reason why Whites are currently being overwhelmed in the more southerly portions of the USA, from the southern half of Cali to the Southwest across Texas and all the way over to portions of The South – from the Atlantic to the Pacific, White colonization/settlement is failing across large portions of the southern half of North America. Forget global warming, more like global browning. Bad news.
Dying Nation:”The media is responsible for making miscegenation more of a problem than it really is. They run advertisements with mixed race couples or show some movie with mudsharks and negros and it hypnotizes your mind into believing it’s common when in fact it’s not. When you actually see one in public it confirms in your mind that it’s true.”
It’s just not “the media” who is responsible, it is the JEWISH MEDIA. That is an important fact to remember.
Terry made a great point @ comment #30. Many of the most weak/non-ethnocentric Whites are currently breeding out of the White gene pool during this period of extreme ethno-racial chaos and tumult. I say let them breed out – we don’t want their weak genes anyhow. If they are predisposed to miscegenation (racial treason) then go ahead and let the trash breed out.