Real world advocacy is critically important, but to engage in a political struggle without acting in accord with overarching meta-political considerations is to thrash around aimlessly. It’s not as simple as merely climbing out of our basements and taking our message to the street. As we all know, theorizing for the sake of theorizing is masturbatory folly. But to argue between theory and action is as absurd as arguing between mind and body – each is useless without the other.
If we hope to ever make progress, it will be through the marriage of deep thought and decisive action.
The first thing one must understand about Western meta-politics is that we’ve been the battleground of a fierce occult war between competing oligarchies for centuries. While other civilizations like India and China have firmly entrenched oligarchies that operate with minimal secrecy and deception, our own situation has been highly complex, loaded with more secrecy, deception, and complexity than a Dan Brown novel. While I don’t claim to comprehend the full sweep of it, I believe I understand the general sweep of events enough to arrive at some basic conclusions that are relevant to the real world activist.
If you don’t have a stomach for the sweeping and speculative, turn back now…
From the fall of the Roman Empire until the Protestant Reformation, Europe’s two oligarchies co-existed in relative stasis. The Germanic warlords evolved into Europe’s nobility, dominating martial and political life, with the Catholic Church dominating managerial and religious life. The alien Jewish managerial caste and the alien Gypsy menial caste were both subject to the hegemony of this power structure, relatively powerless outcasts.
While the Protestant Reformation was ostensibly a theological matter, and surely was for many of the key actors in the struggle, the meta-political factor is that the peasantry of Western Europe were ascendant, becoming more worldly through widespread literacy and more powerful through an increase in private wealth. An emergent elite grew to challenge both the increasingly decadent and derelict nobility and clergy through a loose network of Protestant denominations and trade guilds.
The Age of Discovery brought a tsunami of wealth to this primordial mercantile elite, with the trade guilds becoming the focal points of organized resistance to both papal and royal hegemony. Organically, over the centuries, the masonic guilds morphed from mere trade guilds into a full-fledged secret society, an oligarchy with a haphazard mash-up of initiatic rituals, an elaborate creation myth, and precisely the kind of worldview and ideology one would expect from a band of wealthy businessmen hostile to both their King and their Pope. The Enlightenment was born.
The Catholic Church fought back with the creation of its own secret society, the Jesuit Order. The aristocracy took advantage of the church’s weakened condition to seize more power. The Jews played the competing oligarchies against one another for their own emancipation and enrichment. Europe descended into centuries of occult warfare, smoldering for decades then erupting in fits of terror and genocide. The French Revolution is the quintessential example, though these occult struggles animated virtually every European conflict up until WWII – the final spasmodic resistance to absolute Jewish hegemony.
Meanwhile, the new European nation of America was forming from Europe’s purging of its zealots, scoundrels, and highlanders. Europe’s aristocrats were tied to the Old World and few Catholics settled in North America. We had virtually no Jews. The North American Continent was under the absolute hegemony of Freemasonry.
The American Revolution was meta-politically a struggle between America’s indigenous Masonic oligarchy and the distant aristocratic regime in England. The Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights are thoroughly Masonic. They embody the themes of progressive enlightenment, liberation from tyranny and darkness, and universal “natural rights”. They also establish a system of government that explicitly bans titles of nobility and the establishment of a state religion.
While there’s that bogus Benjamin Franklin quote floating around, a more likely truth is that our founding fathers were simply ignorant of the Jewish Question. What little they did record on the matter demonstrates their naivete. To them, the Jews were little more than another religious denomination oppressed by the cruel tyrants and intolerant priests of the Old World. While our founders were relatively successful in establishing a system of government and a society free of tyrants and inquisitors, their failure to grasp the Jewish Question would eventually unravel their noble attempt at sovereign stewardship.
Much of the contemporary argument about America and its relationship with Europe is affected by the failure to recognize that America did indeed have a Traditional elite, one derived from Europe. Ours is an integrally European tradition, albeit one which was never able to reach its full expression there. To this day, Europe’s Traditionalist intellectuals arrogantly presume that only their traditions are even worthy of the namesake. To them, America is an anti-Traditional abortion, a snake pit of superstitious fools and opportunists.
Freemasonry in America was eventually overwhelmed by Jewish subversion, a mote in our eye that our brothers abroad never fail to herald. But they haven’t raised up an elite of their own capable of stewardship. They’re apparently content to be crypt keepers (euphemistically referred to as historians), wallowing in the rotting remains of the Third Reich, pre-Soviet Orthodoxy, pre-subversion Catholicism, and even such ancient institutions as the Ghibelline faction of the 12th century.
Americans have unfortunately accepted this paradigm uncritically, with one faction dismissing Tradition in favor of an ahistorical and individualist dead end. The other faction embraces Tradition and damns their own nation (if they can even stoop to calling it a true nation) in doing so. The European Traditionalists would like us to believe that we’re their inferiors, that Tradition is somehow tied to the European continent. It’s not. We’re European, as European as they are. Whatever we think, do, and say is integrally European.
Our current situation is abysmal, both here and there. The pope answers to Abe Foxman’s shrill demands. What little is left of the European aristocracy is devoid of any hint of patriarchy or martial honor. There’s some promise to be found in Russian Orthodoxy and Vladimir Putin’s charismatic leadership – but it’s still only speculative and it’s largely hostile toward Americans, anyway. Freemasonry in America has been completely subverted, inverted, and destroyed. A nation decapitated of its elite, robbed of its patriarchs, ceases to be a nation. Both the Ron Paul movement and the Tea Party movement are mere cargo cults. No matter how frequently they repeat Masonic rhetoric and dress up in American Revolutionary costumes, they’re no more likely to resurrect America’s Masonic oligarchy than the primitive islanders are going to bring cargo.
If only a splinter group of Freemasons could have had the foresight and courage to radically reinvent their oligarchy as more than a mere secret society of mercantile elites. Imagine if a small band of Freemasons had created a managerial, martial, and mercantile elite all at once – then went off into the mountains to hide, waiting for the right time to ride in on a white horse and rescue the American nation from our Jewish overlords when our constitution hung by a thread. Perhaps they would have even modified their doctrine to be explicitly White Nationalist. Ideally, and I know this is too much to ask, a highly disciplined army of true patriarchs could have been hidden in plain sight, quietly building parallel trade networks and loading up vast storehouses of food and supplies.
But I’ve digressed.
Any lasting resistance will require either raising up a new oligarchy in opposition to Jewish hegemony or rehabilitating one of our moribund oligarchies. In lieu of raising up our own oligarchy, our most fruitful efforts will be in infiltrating, influencing, and reviving an oligarchy that still has a pulse (however faint). To merely engage in political activism without cleaving to a priesthood or elite, without an actual base of both temporal and spiritual power, is no more useful in turning back the flood than splashing water upstream.