This is perhaps the most important topic facing our folk at this time. Although it is rarely mentioned the healthy reproduction of a nationality is the primary goal of nationalist movements worldwide. The fundamental truth of this matter is perhaps so obvious it did not require any reflection. Current realities however warrant a full discussion of the topic and the obstacles in the path of such a goal. The large scale breakdown of the family unit and traditional courtship rituals in Western countries has resulted in the unprecedented failure to reproduce by our respective nationalities.
No other single issue is more important to the survival of a race.
There are many long standing criticisms of some of the primary symptoms of this collapse, whether that be feminism, birth control, women in the workplace, etc. Those ‘big picture’ issues is not something we can readily fix by educating ourselves as individuals about the problem. Since we lack the ability to make sociological changes in our target demographic, we have to start with whom we can make a difference: each other in our personal relationships.
Before we get to far ahead of ourselves we should define what our goal is. Let’s just say a traditional family unit of a mother and father raising three to five children, the norm of the average American family until about forty years ago.
A Nationalist, by definition, wants the best for his nationality. A nationality however is an abstraction, and in the postmodern world we live in, an increasing irrelevant one. Let’s say that a Nationalist defines their personal success in life as raising a large well adjusted family. That would be a suitable goal for a man or woman who besides everything else, wants to see people like them to be successful.
If you dear reader agree with this assessment that is a good start to begin measuring your own success in life, however not everyone has to or even needs to have a family to provide a valuable role in our community. In previous musings I summarized the perfect mix for a successful relationship: physical attraction, personality compatibility, and shared values. If one of those elements is missing the relationship will be unstable. For most people finding people with one of the three traits is very easy to do. For many more finding someone with two of the three traits is much more difficult. For the unhappy lot that have high expectations (or feelings of entitlement) finding someone with all three traits is exceedingly rare, and the possibility exists that once a person is found they may not be available.
It is my opinion that Nationalists must make an effort in all three areas to become successful in this area in their life, from being physical fit, having a sociable and well rounded personality, and consistently displaying the personal values that make them stand apart from the masses.
Now it may or may not be possible to find a person that has all three traits for a perfect relationship to start. One often hears from women that their values began to change into a Nationalist way of thinking from the influence of a Nationalist boyfriend.
That said it is essential to court a partner in a socially accepted manner. That means not running game on comrades significant other. That means selecting age appropriate partners. Most importantly that means in being ethical in your relations with the opposite sex. One of the worst things that can happen is for a single person to get involved with a group of Nationalists, get involved romantically with a member and bolt the moment the relationship ends.
Since we’re on the topic, being responsible adults that we are, practicing safe sex with a new partner is not optional, it is a requirement. That means from the beginning of the interaction. Not as an afterthought. An unfortunate side effect of the breakdown of the family we have witnessed in the last generation is the prevalence of sexually transmitted infections increases. One of the worst things you could do to our race is be a reason for that trend to continue increasing.
If as an adult you are single and have not been tested since your previous l’amour it is your duty and obligation as a Nationalist to get checked up.
Another matter that should be carefully considered is the wisdom of starting a relationship with the opposite sex in your group or social circle. Human beings maturity regarding sexual liaisons does not evolve much past junior high. Is it worth having word of your, shall we say, exploits, being the talk of the scene? The answer to that question is always no.
There’s another issue at stake here too. I hate to break it to you fellas but the value of women in the movement is not to provide you with sexual gratification. I know I know, you saw that advertised in the flyer of the group you wanted to join (the ubiquitous blond and blue eyed white woman holding a baby in old school nationalists propaganda pictures is really not good) but that’s not your primary purpose to make that happen when you see a single woman attending meetings. Your job as a man is to take care the business of representing and defending our folk from absolute annihilation within a matter of a couple generations. Showing restraint, courtesy, honorable intentions, and fulfilling your obligations as a gentleman to wed a wife and raise a family is your number one priority in life. Not your notch count.
The same goes for our women. Nationalist men have a job to do and the best thing you can do with your presence is become involved in practical and helpful tasks. If your presence is distracting, and it can be by the charms of your sex, you will be doing all of us a disservice.
The best thing a Nationalist man and woman can do is to not find a partner from within the movement. If you do, you are ethically obligated to start relationships you have a sincere interest in being a long term commitment. All too often a relationship happens, a breakup ensues, and our community fractures similar to a what ‘he said’ ‘she said’ scenario and we all suffer from the result of it, not to mention the disagreeable effects on children in such a situation.
I do not presume that sexually ethical behavior is an easy goal to achieve. It’s extremely difficult. Most, if not all, fellow Nationalists will not be motivated by the higher concerns of their race on this issue and will engage in highly unethical behavior that has been the norm for far to long. I also like to say that nothing worthwhile in life is easy. Traveling is expensive, marriage is expensive, raising children is expensive, but the result is priceless.
I want all of us to achieve the sort of success that doesn’t hope for a resurgence of our people but is a resurgence. It starts with being ethical sexually. If this does not happen, the end of the race descended from Europe is guaranteed. If it does happen, every one of us will be responsible for the successful revival of our people.
Thank you.
One of the most unfortunate pathologies I’ve found in the white nationalist movement is placing the blame on us for the failure to succeed in today’s sex market (so-called “game” theory, etc). It should be a no brainer that if the culture is degenerate and Gomorrean males are not to blame. To use a Nietzschean term, a revaluation of all values is in order, especially all axiology about the war of the sexes.
To revaluate sexual mores one must first understand the beautiful sex. In his chapter “On Women” of Essays and Aphorisms, Schopenhauer wrote the most insightful thoughts about women I have ever read, about which I’ll quote some sentences:
(This comment continues in an entry of my blog titled “On Women”…)
The only goal is that there should be plenty of white kids who will grow up to make our white civilization strong, great, and developing, and safe forever. There is so much diversity among whites. There are all kinds of ways to accomplish this goal, and there are different ways for different people, as well as some people changing the ways that work for them, people discovering new ideas, people staying with their original ideas, different sexual temperaments, and interests, and on and on. I think our race has always had a pretty ribald streak in it. But that doesn’t mean everyone is ribald or has to be ribald or that it works for everyone or for most or that it doesn’t work for most, and on and on.
What is true is that knowledge has increased today and more knowledge always means more freedom, decisions, and choice.
We have to avoid the patronizing attitude of the defeated shlub that always caters to the woman’s emotive side, simply because our women are controlled in large part by vicous psychopaths who use their nuture nature against whites. It is if we are all part of a large Jim Jones cult where crazy zeolots force white women to care for “all of god’s children.” From abolition to this disgusting adoption of non-whites, we see white women abused by these warped hate mongers. (anybody see any hollywood jews adopting these non-whites?)
So these psychoptaths abuse our women and we the defeated shlub white men aquiese for a moment’s peace and some circus entertainment. Well those days are about over, the days of easy credit are done, the Left’s taboos are about spent and the latest attempt at taboo (Islam) will backfire greatly.
In analogy we can say to our white sisters imprisoned in the anti-white cult’s day care center; “You can stay here and die or you can follow us and live like Whites should live?”
Ok, so let’s get to white matchmaking!
🙂
The best thing a Nationalist man and woman can do is to not find a partner from within the movement. If you do, you are ethically obligated to start relationships you have a sincere interest in being a long term commitment.
You’d better state this a little more softly, situationally, contextually. The courtship landscape is impossible enough as it is. Yet on top of that you’re asking me to entertain a rather flat-sounding expectation that for companionship and sex (though sex apparently is a mostly non-issue for ethical people) I look within a Nationalist community that I glimpse only in the most passing way, that has no personified presence in my daily life.
Ethical conversations are only to be had with people who carry demonstrated experiential knowledge and understanding, and even then nothing should be taken at face value. Here instead we have a “voice,” a self-understood spokesperson of some ethereal movement, telling us rather categorically what we should and should not do. This is anxiety and insecurity aspiring to ethics.
I suggest folks consider becoming a White biker – we do well with White chicks. And I also suggest that folks not try to make White Nationalism in to a total social group as there will be very few, single White women around.
Take up some whiter form of partner dancing – like C & W – women like to dance and it is the perfect lead in to sexual unions.
I suggest folks consider becoming a White biker – we do well with White chicks. And I also suggest that folks not try to make White Nationalism in to a total social group as there will be very few, single White women around.
Take up some whiter form of partner dancing – like C & W – women like to dance and it is the perfect lead in to sexual unions.
We don’t have to do all the heavy lifting of figuring out approaches to this problem in vacuo. We have the game and dating science material to draw upon.
I’ve found this gentleman gives good advice:
http://www.marriedmansexlife.com/
In my own experience, here is how to have a healthy population:
* Do away with promiscuity
* Court; do not date
* Be as virginal as possible — you will enjoy sex more and have a happier married life
* Make it clear that courting is a means to marriage, and marriage is a contract of many sorts
* Pick a woman you would want to spend the rest of your life with
* Get your own head clear of illusion, irresponsibility and confusion FIRST
There’s no compatibility between modern promiscuous “dating” and having a healthy family-based existence. Give up now on that horrible compromise 🙂
P.S. The link to my further thoughts “on women” is: here.
This won’t happen. It’s as fanciful as widespread conversion to WN in its current form.
Nice idealistic spirit, though. I do appreciate that kind of idealism no matter how non-modern it may be.
Here’s how to get a hot white woman – work out, get a haircut, and make some money.
The first two are optional.
It’s really that easy.
Everyone who doesn’t read Roissy regularly is disqualified to comment. Period. The end.
The fact that many people on our side think degenerates like Roissy are part of the solution shows that we have a long way to go.
Roissyites don’t give us babies – except maybe out of wedlock without a father to provide for child and mother.
Everyone who doesn’t read Roissy regularly is disqualified to comment. Period. The end.
Everyone who uses the term “dating science” with a straight face is disqualified to comment. Period. The end.
Everyone who uses the term “dating science” with a straight face is disqualified to comment. Period. The end.
Okay, you don’t like the term. On the other there’s enough pattern, and accumulated and observed experience, to warrant some degree of organization and systematic approach. So, call that what you will.
The fact that many people on our side think degenerates like Roissy are part of the solution shows that we have a long way to go.
Roissyites don’t give us babies – except maybe out of wedlock without a father to provide for child and mother.
There are always going to be people who read Roissy this way, and there’s merit to their prejudice. But to the extent that Roissy is depraved he merely is reflect the state of things, which he didn’t create and doesn’t support. And in fact (I think this has been argued on this very site) he presents the most real arsenal of understanding and practice with which to wage this fight, on behalf of sexual and familial order and stability. I learn more about civilized life, for example, from posts of his like this (http://roissy.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-problem-with-women-is-too-much-self-esteem/) than I do from any of the pious remarks about biblical law (good!) or children out of wedlock (baaaaad!).
Roissy raises valid points but he is not a model of sexually ethical behavior nor is he a Nationalist. He writes for himself for his own amusement, his utility for us as white men is to understand a small aspect of social dynamics he writes about, nothing more, nothing less.
Here’s my dating advice. Whatever else you do or don’t do, don’t be angry around the women. Be a racist, but don’t be an angry racist. Other than that, courting women now is no different than it’s ever been, i.e. women like a confident, squared-away man who can support them.
Roissy pretty much is a nationalist, actually.
Do you guys even read his stuff?
I think this fellow from my area reflects my views rather succinctly:
@ Hunter
This blog is going downhill in a hurry.
First, you got some Irish Roman Catholic jackoff playing Pope. Now you got a thread going that smells like acne medication. What’s next, Father McFeely talks about marriage?
I don’t know Roissy from Hilary Rodham Clinton’s husband. How in the world did I ever manage to get marry a good woman and keep her?
Seriously, anyone who needs to read a book in order to manage basic biological and social functions must have Asberger’s Syndrome.
I think this fellow from my area reflects my views rather succinctly:
Nice to see good representation for White Southerners and White Americans as a whole, an intelligent, successful, charismatic Nordic male speaking out for his people.
Demographics is certainly part of the battle. If you do nothing else have a large and successful family.
DeoVindice says
I think this fellow from my area reflects my views rather succinctly:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjUfbkR75-c
Really nice youtube. States one or two major goals around real large issues (large family, Confederacy, etc). Doesn’t go into all the millions of variations one way or another. Maybe its good to hang everything on one or two things, and then variations can be worked out inside of that. The video also has a link to another really nice video, a mellow statement of secession rights at all levels of human organization (the background music is similar to the type of background music in Brokeback Mountain?).
http://www.youtube.com/user/RedShirtArmy
These Roissy apologists are hilarious. Yes, he’s a degenerate, but it’s OK since he didn’t start it!.
Yes, familial order and stability are founded on the bedrock of “Game” that teaches men how to be promiscuous and uncommitted.
“Seriously, anyone who needs to read a book in order to manage basic biological and social functions must have Asberger’s Syndrome.”
Female-style shaming language with an absence of actual argument. Go back to your closet.
“Yes, familial order and stability are founded on the bedrock of “Game” that teaches men how to be promiscuous and uncommitted.”
You misspelled “teaches men how to be attractive to women”. Hope this helps!
Men who are attractive to women can use that in any number of ways. Some, you may approve of. Some, you probably don’t.
It’s frankly amazing to me how many men who are perfectly willing to put themselves forward as brave and clear-sighted for seeing the differences between races are utterly incapable of doing the same when it comes to differences between the sexes.
Nothing has aligned me to fight for family more than reading Roissy.
Actually, I can identify exactly where people are departing from each other in this thread, and on Roissy in general:
Roissy presents better than anyone the price of marriage.
Pickup artists with gigolo habits and “traditionalist” anti-Roissyites are fundamentally agreed–they want their relationships, their connections and attachments, and especially their marriages, on the cheap.
I like the pickup artists for their honesty; they lack something for emotional depth. On the other side we have cowards, whose seventh-rate faux-traditionalist fairy tales about marriage set me on edge. We are agreed, perhaps, on what marriage ought to be, and the social and institutional force that a sane society might put behind it.
But it isn’t there and individuals have to make their way through the brutal reality. Shriek at them. I’m sure it will help relieve their feelings of alienation to know that, while they don’t know how to say “hi” to a girl in a coffee shop, they should be building a strong Euro-American marital union. No, there’s no disconnect there at all. I yield the floor. We should listen to you guys. What’s there in Roissy anyway, aside from a bunch of degeneracy?
It is patently obvious that PUA want easy sex and one night stands, not relationships and marriages.
I’m not sure where you get the idea that people who believe in traditional notions of marriage belive they shouldn’t work for it.
Yes, people who criticize Roissy are cowards. You really zinged us there!
You just told us in the previous sentence that our notions of marriage are “seventh-rate” “fairy tales”. Now you’re saying we’re in agreement. Heh.
I’ll tell you what this nonwhite sexual-predator “Roissy” preaches. He preaches the equivalent to honor what miscegenation is to blood-integrity.
What is the blood without the honor? What is the honor without the blood? What we want, what we need, what any group needs, is “blood and honor”. A man who promotes or even who accepts either Miscegenation or Roissy-ism, (or both — usually if you accept one of them you’ll accept the other), that man is hopelessly adrift at best, and a “Volksfeind” at worst.
I’d echo Donald’s comments: #1, #2. He says it more concisely than I can.
The best thing the OP says is this: Avoid seeking women who are “racially aware”, or something like that, as a prerequisite for pairing. That is so silly. Just find a regular woman. The test as to whether to go with it is very simple: Imagine your genetics as a jar filled with fluid. Your genetics fills up to the brim. If you’d be OK with pouring out half of yours from the jar and using hers to fill up the rest and living with that for a lifetime (i.e., putting yourself in your child’s shoes), then it’s a green light. If you waffle on this, on how proud you would be to mingle her genetics with yours, then cut the cord. No matter how much you think you “love” her or how scared you are of never finding someone, cut the damn cord. (Assuming no children have been born yet).
But most importantly, do not talk about ‘deep’ politics until after she’s won over, and probably not much even after that. It’s only the rare woman that will seriously discuss “politics” like we do here. Keep things lighthearted if you know what’s best for you.
In this vein, I’d echo Jack Ryan’s comment from earlier: “I suggest that folks not try to make White Nationalism in to a total social group as there will be very few, single White women around.” There’s a danger in making racialism into a subculture in which you get stuck. Looking for partners within it is a fool’s errand.
It is patently obvious that PUA want easy sex and one night stands, not relationships and marriages.
You’re already so stupid and tone deaf here that I need to stop and comment. Pickup artists manifest a strong disinclinations to long-term attachment, and there’s no social fabric in place to punish them for raiding females for sex. But in many cases women may manifest this appetite earlier and more aggressively, and either way the social services state is essentially geared to reinforce this drive. We need some way to map and understand this.
I’m not sure where you get the idea that people who believe in traditional notions of marriage belive they shouldn’t work for it.
I get it logically. There’s a palpably value-neutral quality to Roissy’s writing. He says, “This is what marriage is.” His writing and experience suggests one way to deal with this knowledge, but he isn’t an absolutist, and he clearly sides with those whose aim is to repair the social fabric. It’s one thing to be disappointed in ferocious game-influenced behavior, but to rage at it as you do? If this were poker that would be your tell. These guys aren’t committing some existential sin by fucking girls. You’re afraid to see the expression of truth in their activity, and to really face up to the state of things, and the intricate difficulty in restoring an authentic social fabric. You want pretty half-truths about what it takes to win this fight. You want that fight and everything involved on the cheap.
But you’re right–Roissy doesn’t help at all with this. He’s just a degenerate. You guys got it all figured. I’m listening!
Why are some comments “moderated” and others not?
I posted one timestamped “September 14, 2010 at 2:05 pm” which fell into a mod-queue but another afterwards that didn’t…?
I think moderation is random. The publishing of my comments has been a little erratic and I’ve experienced this on other blogs and websites.
I guess at this stage sustained exchange would amount to trolling. We’ve gotten our points across. For me, Roissy’s observations, and by extension the pickup subculture and habit, reveal something that needs to be faced head on by those who honestly seek restoration. I get that the hard edges and abandoned aspect of what Roissy depicts sets people on edge, but I’m afraid that’s not to be helped–or at least, it’s the price of a truer portrait.
Evan is right about Roissy. Also, the traditionalists have a romanticized vision of the pre-1970 West and monogamy. Outside of Germanic countires, women were expected to be monogamous within marriage not men. Furthermore, within the Germanic countries if a man became rich he didn’t tend to be monogamous either.
Outside of Germanic countires, women were expected to be monogamous within marriage not men. Furthermore, within the Germanic countries if a man became rich he didn’t tend to be monogamous either.
This sounds right to me.
American dialogue is inescapably Puritanical.
I think Roissy should be almost required reading for EVERYONE under 50 and over 18. As a female, and one who has just turned 40 (sadly now basically a non-entity in RoissyWorld, lol), I have to admit that I have been really hurt by some of what he has written, and most likely will be in the future.
Still, I usually find myself grudgingly agreeing with him in his analysis. In fact, I wish I had read some of his stuff in my late teens and early 20’s…….
His post on September 11th this year was pretty amazing too. Like him or loathe him, but ignore him? No way.
Further comments about Roissy, a non issue to this topic, will be deleted.
Wanderer,
The Akismet filter continues to suck up comments. I have no idea why it is doing this. I’m going to install a new one and edit the discussion settings in the WordPress control panel this evening. In theory, that should be sufficient to solve the problem.
I check the filter every time I browse this site. If there are comments in the queue, I usually approve them. I believe I approved your comment this morning.
Knowledge is a good thing. There’s no harm in knowing and understanding how the “game” is played. Because the “game” will be played whether one chooses to play or not. If it improves ones ability to interact / attract a worthy partner then I’m all for it. But if one’s goal is simply promiscuity then I think that just undermines family and heritage.
The original post was a bit rambling but well enough, I suppose. Still, it’s a shame you felt it necessary to actually tell people things they should already know. And I’m not convinced telling people not to act like trash is going to keep anyone from acting like trash.
Earl,
This blog will soon get back on track. I intend to make a few necessary changes.
Quite a few posts were deleted from this discussion.
Yeoman, isn’t it better to have a healthy discussion in the “comments” that admittedly may ramble a bit, than have a small handful of strictly-OT comments and that’s the end?
“Yeoman, isn’t it better to have a healthy discussion in the “comments” that admittedly may ramble a bit, than have a small handful of strictly-OT comments and that’s the end?”
No.
Wanderer–
I’m not a Roissy fan, but what many WNs don’t realize is this: not everybody who rubs you the wrong way is Jewish.
“Wiedmann” isn’t a Jewish surname, just German. And Lady Raine is far too unstable to bother with. You might as well go with “Judicial.biz,” which is basically the weekly world news as far as the JQ is concerned.
I see, when sexual subjects come up on OD, the same sausage-fest of frustrated white nerds that couldn’t get laid in a whorehouse with a hundred dollar bill stapled to their foreheads have plenty of wisdom to dispense.
Women are people too, not statistics, not pavlovian bitches salivating over your car or your wallet, not acquisitions, not sheep or babies for you to guide one way or another. If they knew this is how you think of them, they’d not only NEVER marry you, but wouldn’t even want to give you a short-term good time. AND, believe it or not, not every hot white chickie wants to be (nor should be) the future mother of the white race. Slutty types still have a place within white society. Don’t discount them.
Quit spending your time quoting dead nerds from centuries long gone or live ones who think they know what women want and go out, meet girls, maybe get laid with a total attitude of non-attachment to (in the Krishnaite sense) or anxiety over the results. If it’s right, you’ll find a wife. If not, well at least you won’t be so uptight and frustrated.
Quite a few posts were deleted from this discussion.
I tell you what’s far more annoying and insulting than off-topic discussion, tyrants who delete comments on their whim and want to control what people think and say.
Maybe off-topic discussion happens because it’s far more interesting than what you were writing about, ever think of that.
What most of these “writers” really want is just yes-men that pet their egos.
@ “Quit spending your time quoting dead nerds from centuries long gone…”
I wish it were that simple. Unfortunately, there are even scientists that in this century are researching the “battle of the sexes” as brutally honest as Schopenhauer did long ago, as I have recently said in a postscript to my article linked above.
The point is that we must grasp first the biological basis of our lust to win the favor of one of these beautiful specimens. Just as Schopenhauer spoke out the naked truth about women, so naked that no woman will ever accept it, now I will quote zoologist John Sparks, the producer of the 1996 TV series Battle of the Sexes in the Animal World.
It turns out that we males are literally driven by our gonads. Thanks to the attraction toward young nymphs, what I have called “the crown of evolution,” our unattainable goal is to fill the world with duplicates of us. In the introduction to his book, Sparks wrote:
/quote:
Every living creature has an overwhelming urge to breed. This is not simply a trivial expression of bestial lust, but a fundamental characteristic of life, the fulfilment of which determines whether an animal is a success or a failure. The nature of sex is widely misunderstood, a matter which this book [Battle of the Sexes, BBC Worldwide, 1999] will attempt to rectify.
Animals of every kind strive to ensure the survival of as many of their genes as possible. Sex specifically demands very public behaviour among many species. With an almost unlimited supply of sperm at their disposal, [the males’] best reproductive strategy is to mate with as many females as possible; each of which will provide them with offspring. From the male’s perspective, there are never enough females to go around [My note: this strategy doesn’t work with humans. See, e.g., my entry on Abraham & Casanova in my blog]. Competition between the lusty males is therefore intense.
However, in species in which males have opted for dedicated monogamy the females are usually the larger sex; in some cases, the males are miniaturized. Charles Darwin was aware of degenerate males. For most kinds of animals, no matter what tactics the males employ to further their sexual aspirations, it is the females which determine the winners. This is because—as we shall see in the next chapter—it is they which do the choosing.
Suicidal sex
Other remarkable strategies have evolved which illustrate the extremes to which males will go to give their own sperm the best chance of reaching the eggs first. In Australia, male red-tailed phascogales—small, squirrel-like carnivores—burn themselves out in an all-or-nothing quest for fatherhood. These endearing little marsupials [are] so intent on finding as many targets as possible for their precious sperm that they have no time to feed during their week of frenzied sexual activity. While the freshly impregnated females retire to their nests, the knackered males rapidly succumb to a combination of infections, failed livers, gut ulcers, extensive hemorrhages and extreme weight loss. Not one adult male survives. But 50 per cent of the females’ babies will be males and by the following spring they will be mature enough to enter the same lethal sexual arena.
One battle over, another looms
The egg is now fertilized—in a split second, a new life has been initiated. This has been achieved against astronomical odds. Both the sperm and its slave, the male body which produced it [my emphasis] and propelled it into the female’s tract, have had to be supreme players in the most rigorous and demanding contest on earth—survival. The male has relied on countless brawling ancestors, themselves winners endowed with the skills needed to overcome both physical dangers and cut-throat competition from rivals. His sperm has passed the female’s demanding tests for quality control. Of the billions that started the race, many were deformed, most simply got lost or died of exhaustion. Of the few that lashed their way to the egg, only one was victorious.
Although it takes place on a microscopic scale, this is the key event over which the sexes have been striving to exert control.
/end quote
My comment:
From the zoological viewpoint it is worth noting that, unlike the birds, in our species a male can force a female to copulate. In fact, among the primates rapes are pretty common, especially among orang-utans and chimpanzees. Of course, women “are people too, not statistics, not pavlovian bitches.”
Point taken.
“Noi vogliamo glorificare … il disprezzo della donna.”
Compared to that Roissy’s a blabbermouth, as are all you wannabe-choirboy axiologists.
I’m afraid that when one allows oneself to speak of “courting” as though this social ritual were still active, all data pertaining to the nature of modern women drop from consideration; for putting the two together consciously, in one ideal construct, would be as absurd as suggesting one have a chat with an unruly dog about please correcting its behavior. You don’t court wild fucking animals. You capture or shoot them.
Did you know that taking a bride in Afghanistan costs an average $4 – 10,000? Afghan men will go work at gas stations in Iran to scrape up the funds, more money in one push than they’ll make in lifetime, and blow it all on their bitch wives who stain their forefingers voting for foreign puppets at the first opportunity.
Axiom: Even in Afghanistan woman is overpriced and underoppressed.