Earlier this month I attended the Amren 2011 “Shadow conference” in Charlotte North Carolina to spite the enemies of our people who believe that white folks have no right to discuss their own interests. And I was sure glad I went. With me were dozens of like minded people who often traveled just as far away to meet others, discuss issues of political importance, and find fellowship in the beleaguered white community.
The event was organized by the incredible efforts of Jaenelle Antas of Lighthouse Publishing and Matt Parrot of the Hoosier Nation. Along with other speakers I was honored to speak about Community Organizing and political activism alongside such esteemed activists as Paul Fromm, Matt Parrot, and Jew Among You.
As you could imagine there was much talk and speculation about the cancellation of Amren at the hands of a government official who is a lifelong member of many organizations that tout their advocacy for black people. Spontaneously it occurred to us to protest the hotel where Amren was supposed to be held and with a few others we made signs, went to the hotel, and quickly got harassed by the immigrant foreigner staff of the Sheraton who quickly threatened us (even faking a phone call to the police). So we took our signs and stood along a major road with the message of defiance.
My impressions of the fellow attendees, some local, some who drove ten or twelve hours to attend, was of the highest caliber. The sincerity and indeed faith these people expressed to the white America they loved and lived to see thrown away and discarded by Americas elite was humbling. This event reaffirmed to me the need for a consistent and public effort to represent our people in a way consistent with the cultural and historical paradigms with the American people.
To my knowledge this Shadow Conference was the most important event to date in the white advocacy movement this year and that made me think: we need events like this every weekend. White advocacy should not be a biannual conference. It should be a regular, vital activity by the throngs of those that consider themselves committed to our people future. No matter what your station or position in life, there are no excuses for missing the honorable act of representing the interests of white people.
The enemy believes they can cow our folk to extinction with a couple phone calls. For many of those that were going to attend Amren, that is all it took. A couple men I know whom I highly respect went so far as to say they would not “spend one penny in Charlotte and their negro mayor” as though this was merely an issue a few tax dollars. This and similar events are symbolic not economic. That we can organize and openly proclaim our interests despite the controlled opposition of party politics is a symbol of our refusal to back down and fade from the stage of history. The cost of sending that message is irrelevant.
Yet despite that truth some of our comrades will back down without a fight. Some will back down with their tail in between their legs. Some will back down by merely having their picture posted on the internet. However, some others will rise to the occasion and show the opposition what the men and women of the West are capable of. I am proud to have met a few of them that weekend. The mood of our little gathering was angry and defiant. I left Charlotte revitalized with the commitment of new comrades and relationships that will hopefully continue to make an impact far beyond the Shadow Conference. As Matt Parrot states in his incredibly touching visit to the grave of Channon Christian, the success or failure holds the future to protecting our people from all those that would do us harm.
Below is a link of my presentation and a link to a podcast recording the talk courtesy of Voice Of Reason radio.
http://reasonradionetwork.com/20110214/american-dark-age-andrew-yeoman
I love the idea for regular events of this sort. I would be much more likely to attend more frequent meeting. I have surfed around the edges of this movement for a few years now, and attendance at one of these events would likely pull me closer into the fold. I would especially appreciate it if some meetings are in my geographic area (Great Lakes). Even non-local meetings are easier to attend (by far) if there are several dates throughout the year to choose from. I work several contracts a year, and do not often have the chance to choose my days off on a pre-planned basis.
I understand that there are already WN meetings of one type or another that are closer to me, but most are of a type that I would prefer to not associate with if at all possible. I enjoy sites such as OD, TOQ, Counter Currents, VOR and a few others in the same vein. I know that all contributors on these different sites do not get along, and some claim to subscribe to wildly differing viewpoints, but in general they stand alone from the masses of VNN type sites. If I was to meet with local WN’s at this point I would be meeting with VNN types, and that is not what I am looking for.
The first video was a bit hard to watch, because the audience seems small, and Andrew is not afraid to call us out. I have not been doing all I can do, for example I have not been called “a Nazi” (except for online, lol). What he says rings true, because most of the people I have aired my beliefs to were already quite comfortable with them. It doesn’t hurt to let somebody know they aren’t alone, but it helps us more to bring it to those that are less comfortable to hear the truth.
I know I can do more, at this point I have moved some wafflers over to our side, but have not done much to bring my own family over. Most of them have plenty of personal experience that should make it easy to move them, but are still firmly in the grasp of the mainstream views on race. I haven’t exposed myself (and our ideas) to any people that can hurt me by disagreeing, and that is a shame.
I look forward to the next few years, if we put more effort in and if events keep proceeding, we will make progress.
I also very much enjoyed the part about “deinvesting from the grid”, as in building non-government/corporate networks of small business. This is one of the reasons that I moved back to Michigan, my group of friends and associates here are all implicitly aware and have for a large part moved into the grey market. I spent a time in Texas to find that although money can be made, it was not a satisfying place (for me), and was corporate in nature (with all that entails).
Kievsky can take some credit for influencing me in this direction, and I have in turn convinced many of those around me to strike out on their own. This is not specifically WN in any way but definitely helps us. Many of these people are simply conservative and they love to be independent while also starving the beast of tax dollars.
Jacob,
I am very glad I influenced you to de-invest the grid and start doing networks of small businesses! This is no mean feat. Doing one’s own business is tough.
You know what I have discovered is a good business? Debt collecting for local small businesses, and keeping up their A/R systematically. You let them outsource bill collecting, both late and on time, to you. You don’t want to be the book keeper, you let someone else (competent hopefully) be in charge of that, but the book keeper gives you all the info every week for accounts receivable once they are a week late. Calling the late or slow or no paying customers is one of the worst jobs a business has to do. The ones that pay on time, you get nothing, and you get a percentage of the ones that pay late but do pay, and the percentage is higher the longer they don’t pay, up to like 25%. Get Michelle Dunn’s books if you are interested on Credit and Collections.
And think of it this way — you are collecting from people who treat us rather badly when they know what we advocate, and that’s only because the cause of White survival has been labeled “evil” over and over again on the television. Does it really bother you to collect bills from such people? It wouldn’t bother me. On the other hand, if you become wealthy and create jobs, such people will suck up to you.
This is a mindweapon realization — that our people deserve empathy but not sympathy. That when you have a higher consciousness than ordinary people, you have a right and duty to lead them, but to lead them, you need to gain influence, and to gain influence, you need to become wealthy.
The natural aversion to doing bill collecting/loan sharking et cetera is the opposite of sociopathy. If it disgusts you, this shows you are a decent, normal, non-sociopathic person.
It’s the psychology of why sociopaths became super wealthy and now lord over us. If our people were wiser, they woudln’t let sociopaths take over. But they did, and now we’re stuck.
So basically you have to become just a little bit sociopathic. there’s a lot of bills that need collecting. It’s like picking up seashells at the beach.
Then you can capitalize other businesses, such as convenience stores, and we can start doing White owned c stores, instead of them all owned by Indians and Pakistanis.
But it’s getting the initial capital that’s going to take some (admittedly distasteful) chutzpah. But do you really want to live in a country where EVERY SINGLE CONVENIENCE STORE is owned by someone from the subcontinent? There’s 4 of them (at least) for every one of us, so they could easily do it, if they haven’t already.
I worked for 15 years in commercial collections and I agree it’s a good job for a WN, because if you can show that you are good at it, the business will leave you alone and you don’t have to worry as much about PC office politics.
Most people don’t like to do collections, it’s like cold calling sales – scares the hell out of most people.
My advice is to get in to a business and do the receivables and not try to start up a business from your home as that is again, mostly cold calling sales.
My start was with a commercial roofing company and I got a temp job as a staff accountant where handling the A/R was one of my responsibilities and I just was really good at it. Devlop relationships with your customers, be good on the phone, tell some jokes so the others on the other end will sort of want to talk to you. One key to success is to work some exchange to get paid, don’t just give away all your goods and services and leave it up to the customers to pay you as per the contract – hold something back, like a warranty, a key part of the work, which you will supply when they pay. It’s a hostage exchange. Working as a full time retail bill collector for a collection company is a terrible job – particularly credit card collections, most people burn out very quickly as you are beating up on poor Americans who are failing in life or 3rd world NWs who are just ripping off our financial systems. You can get some knowledge and experience to help yourself and other Whites in the real world with their credit problems/issues.
Thanks for the info, Jack.
Cold calling people who owe money isn’t like telemarketing though. You have a damn good reason to call them. The Michelle Dunn books tell you how to do the whole thing, including collection letters, marketing material, et cetera. The one thing you need to do is form an LLC and set up call recording in case a debtor tries to sue you for unfair debt collection practices.
I’ve done a little bit of collections of relatively fresh A/R (less than 1 year) and when you actually get the check, wow it’s a rush. You might want to work for a company for a while before you start your home business/sweatshop. There’s a lot of unemployed WN’s out there who’d be psyched to channel their hostility on race traitors and NW’s via debt collecting, and get a commission for it.
Interesting that you mention bill collection. Tomorrow I am delivering notice of an eviction to one of my landlord’s tenants. I also recently spoke to one of my White neighbors that is self-employed in tree maintenance and removal, he mentioned trouble collecting from several clients. I could propose to assist in the collection for a fee. Actually, he owes me a small amount of money as well due to some computer repair work that I performed for him.
It doesn’t make me feel good to do that type of work, but the clients were already provided the service and should have to pay for it. It especially irks me when an independent business owner is stiffed. My landlord is having trouble making loan payments due to the poor quality of several of his tenants. Our local economy is so poor right now that there are plenty of opportunities for collection.
Jacob,
Get the Michelle Dunn books. It gives you all the form letters and language and rules and laws of debt collecting. The biggest startup cost is recording your phone calls.
Get in touch with me via e-mail via my blog.
“I know I can do more, at this point I have moved some wafflers over to our side, but have not done much to bring my own family over. Most of them have plenty of personal experience that should make it easy to move them, but are still firmly in the grasp of the mainstream views on race. I haven’t exposed myself (and our ideas) to any people that can hurt me by disagreeing, and that is a shame.”
One of the most direct ways you can promote change is to use your white voice. When you make even an innocuous statement, precede it by saying, “As a white American, I think….” That opens a lot of doors. And it works against the most powerful taboo we face, that discussing white-centric issues is bad.
Teaching friends and family about the realities of race is using the thick-edge of the wedge, that comes much later or, quite possibly, is already in place. After all, it is a principal topic in media and entertainment….hard to miss, actually.
What’s missing is a white point of view, and it can be established if we all start our sentences (when appropriate) with “As a white American, I believe…..”
WN is like building a sand castle on the beach.
You can spend hours each day laboring to build a magnificent sand castle, but each night the tide comes in, and the next morning you find that the work of the previous day has been destroyed.
You rebuild the sand castle. The tide comes in and ruins it again. The cycle continues until you realize that you can avoid the tide by building your sand castle further up the beach.
Instead of having your work destroyed every night, you can invest time and energy in creating an enduring project, one that gains strength with each passing day, without the disruption.
In this analogy, the tide would represent the vanguard and the destructive stereotypes, rhetorical radicalism, exhibitionism and framing that surrounds them both in the media and in the public mind.
The sand castle would be the constructive efforts of people who work within the WN movement (under that label) to reach out to a larger audience on issues that affect Whites like free trade, immigration, affirmative action, multiculturalism, foreign policy and most of our other grievances.
You can make the best pitch imaginable to our target audience on these winning 70 percent issues, make the sale, but before they sign the final papers, they will step further into our circles and see that so many people involved with WN are married to these albatrosses and dealbreaking 1 percent issues like worshiping fascism and violence and destroying Christianity and anti-Americanism and nihilism and sociopathy.
Alternatively, you can focus on a single issue outside the WN movement, whether it be immigration or gun rights, and cut ties to the vanguard, and your efforts won’t be disrupted in the real world and you can make the sale and each day your project will grow in size and momentum along the lines of NumbersUSA, the NRA, and Gun Owners of America.
As for violent crime, the solution of “rejecting the system” leaves White people at the tender mercies of our empowered enemies who face nothing in the way of resistance to their agenda. It offers no incentive to join the White Nationalist movement in a state with favorable demographics like Tennessee.
In Tennessee, as in North Carolina, at least 20 percent of the White population is explicitly racially conscious, but WNs have no means of connecting with this audience, no legitimacy in their communities, and a message which is attached to dealbreakers that the White majority in that state cannot accept.
Jacob C. says:
It doesn’t make me feel good to do that type of work, but the clients were already provided the service and should have to pay for it. It especially irks me when an independent business owner is stiffed. My landlord is having trouble making loan payments due to the poor quality of several of his tenants. Our local economy is so poor right now that there are plenty of opportunities for collection.
Jack Ryan replies:
Let me share a very effective collection technique with you. First, you probably know that 3rd party disclosure of an unpaid debt is illegal for any debt collector – you can’t go around town saying “so and so is a dead beat, he doesn’t pay his bills like this one”.
But, you can put pressure on the debtor by implying bad things through something called
“an asset and liability investigation”.
What you do is to contact the debtor and if he doesn’t pay right away, you let him know that you’re aren’t going to just keep asking him to pay, instead you’re going to do an
asset and liability investigation to present your client with the key information to go forward (implied legal action) to collect the debt, you’re going to talk to the debtor’s landlord, his bank, his vendors and see if you are not paying others, bouncing checks, that sort of thing – you’re basically going to put the word out that the debtor is on shaky ground, his business going under. The debtor isn’t going to want you to do that and be upfront and say, “hey if it was my business, I wouldn’t want people contacting my banker, landlord, vendors etc’. And if he agrees to pay you, then you’ll hold off on the investigation.
Once you start the asset and liability investigation, just contact the debtor and drop some private information you found out, confirm the information is correct, you can do criminal background checks, department of motor vehicle reports of DUIs that sort of thing.
The implication is that you will share this negative information with all kinds of important people and mess up his reputation, his business – but that this doesn’t have to happen if he just settles the debt.
If the debtor owes many people in addition to your client, he’ll pay you first to get you off his back as you’re the one who’s doing so much more than just writing letters.
In Tennessee, as in North Carolina, at least 20 percent of the White population is explicitly racially conscious, but WNs have no means of connecting with this audience, no legitimacy in their communities, and a message which is attached to dealbreakers that the White majority in that state cannot accept.
Every time I tune into the Political Cesspool, I’m irked with how much time James Edwards spends attacking conservatives. What good does that do? OK we get it, he doesn’t like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, or Glenn Beck. But these are for the most part on the side of white people and they already have raving leftists attacking them around the clock. Attacking ordinary conservatives alienates the target audience, a lot of people happen to like those talk show hosts…people who can’t stand B.O. and political correctness.
I guess the point is to alienate the majority of White people who live in Tennessee because they suffer from poor leadership?
You can make the best pitch imaginable to our target audience on these winning 70 percent issues, make the sale, but before they sign the final papers, they will step further into our circles and see that so many people involved with WN are married to these albatrosses and dealbreaking 1 percent issues like worshiping fascism and violence and destroying Christianity and anti-Americanism and nihilism and sociopathy.
Yes. The Will Williamses’ ears prick up; they assume they know what is being talked about; and they feel they simply must step in to let people know the real deal is — what “Dr. Pierce” would have thought etc. That does tend to complicate “speaking in one’s white voice.”
Any pointers on circumventing that obstacle, Cary?
Perhaps something about refusing to allow extremists to speak on all whites’ behalf, coupled with a pointed reminder that just because extremists distort the issues , it doesn’t change the essentially anti-white nature of whatever aspect of whatever issue was under discussion; ie this remains important and it requires attention.
Andrew,
Seeing as our “nationalist” side only had ~ 3 activists hit the streets at this White Nationalist event. It might be time for you to focus more on the “anarchist” side in recruiting, go for the alienated, rebellious, anti globalist youth and work in a little nationalism on the side.
For whatever reasons, the open White nationalist “movement” in America isn’t a happening scene, so go with what is happening.
I would like to ask Edwards one day what he feels he is accomplishing by attacking conservatives. Attacking the conservatives does nothing to inform his core nationalist audience or give them new information — I doubt anyone in his audience benefits from hearing yet again about the worthless conservatives for possibly the 20 billionth time since Pierce wrote Why Conservatives Can’t Win 40 years ago. And, at the same time, attacking the conservatives in the way that he does accomplishes little or nothing to convince any conservatives to abandon conservatism in favor of WNism. It doesn’t make a lot of sense.
Jack said: “For whatever reasons, the open White nationalist “movement” in America isn’t a happening scene, so go with what is happening.”
Hunter said: “I guess the point is to alienate the majority of White people who live in Tennessee because they suffer from poor leadership?
…
First. The terms “white” and “nationalism” both need to be dropped. This is not a picayune matter. Using the term “white,” which has both racial and ethnic meanings, effectively invites a large portion of those who seek to eliminate you into the camp. As we know, the gravest threat to the ethnoracial continuation of the occidental man is racial liberalism, whether espoused by actual racial liberals or various disingenuous folk. Why give certain people an opportunity to testify against you? Moreover, why expend you efforts advocating for people that are either hostile or indifferent to you. Some would argue that since designators other than “white” have no present market value, establishing one is a wasteful expenditure of energy. I would point out, however, that at present “whiteness” has a negative market value; you are a failed cooperation that refuses to give up its name, a name which is synonymous with failure.
Given the dynamics of the situation, using the racial term white, has overwhelmingly negative externalities.
As for “nationalism,” that term either mean identifying ethnically as a people or it means seeking political self-determination. The latter presupposes having a community of the former — which, as we all noted, you don’t have. The problem with using nationalism as a modifier for white to signify racially white people who identify as a people is that it’s a cumbersome term and one which fails to communicate the image of you as a people; the latter is more critical issue. Compare: “the wellbeing of Jews” to the “wellbeing of white nationalists.” With the form, you think of a group of people who can’t help being themselves (their being and doing are equated)– such a group of people can be abused, defamed, or exterminated — such a people can not be asked to not be them. With the latter, you think of a group of people who choose to identify and associate in a particular manner. When that manner of acting is deemed “bad,” “wrong,” “racist” it can be demanded that that people stop acting in the (wrong) manner they act — accordingly, curing them of their wrongful ways in no way can be seen as a form of abuse or genocide.
By using the terms “white” and “nationalist” or some variation thereof you are causing yourself undo trouble. I would suggest you take a future oriented perspective. This means, first, recognizing that in the modern world, for many, it’s natural to not associate racially just as it’s natural to not associate religiously; second, it means, seeing yourself as an ethnoracially connected network existing in a world filled with a diversity of models (religious, political, pastime based, linguistic) of networks. Your goal accordingly, is not to defend people who happen to be racially white, but to build your network. Perhaps in the future you will deem that ethnic self-determination is a worthwhile goal or perhaps, when genetic engineering comes on line, you will re-engineer yourself into a truly distinct species.
…
Second. Hunter, it’s best to remember why people act in that manner. Rejecting the ideology of liberal conservatism is a necessary step toward your ends. You point is that, tactically, it’s necessary to work politically with conservatism and that attacking conservatives, many who are paleoconvservative in heart, is a self-defeating strategy. No doubt. But given that some are dedicated to directly defending and advancing western interest, it might be worthwhile pointing out how this can be done in a manner that does not sabotage various political goals.
“Seeing as our “nationalist” side only had ~ 3 activists hit the streets at this White Nationalist event. It might be time for you to focus more on the “anarchist” side in recruiting, go for the alienated, rebellious, anti globalist youth and work in a little nationalism on the side.”
The popularity of this doesn’t concern me. Where are the WTO ’99 black bloc protesters now? Nowhere to be seen, not a single one of them has emerged as a spokesman for anti-globalism. I do this because I believe in it.
Also keep in mind with the picture taker we were 4 strong, that is more than any other known group of white advocates protesting on behalf of white folks since the beginning of the year and I am proud to have been a part of that.
Chuck says:
First. The terms “white” and “nationalism” both need to be dropped. This is not a picayune matter. Using the term “white,” which has both racial and ethnic meanings, effectively invites a large portion of those who seek to eliminate you into the camp. As we know, the gravest threat to the ethnoracial continuation of the occidental man is racial liberalism, whether espoused by actual racial liberals or various disingenuous folk. Why give certain people an opportunity to testify against you?
Jack Ryan replies:
Yeah, I guess it is like the Pavlov’s dog experiment (cruel) – where the tester rang a bell every time before he would feed the dog, so after awhile the dog was conditioned to hear the bell and come running, expected to be feed.
White Americans have been conditioned to hear the terms “White” and or “Nationalism” and respond with fear, loathing, hatred and this comes from mostly White folks, not just jews, Blacks, non Whites.
Another conditioning is that when the terms “White” and “Nationalism” get put out, a disruptive sub cult of societal misfits comes of the swamps expecting beer, group activities of yelling at each other, accusing others of being “traitors”, “fat”, “queers”, crypto Jews”, that sort of thing.
One solution as you suggested is to avoid the terms “White” and “nationalism” completely and just organize and do the White Nationalist thing under a different name.
One of our guys who did a great job of this is Russian extreme Nationalist Vladimir Zhironovsky – “Mad Vlad”. Vlad named his extreme Russian Nationalist party, (hard core against NW mountain Muslim Caucus people) he named his party the Russian equivalent of:
The Liberal Democrat party
🙂
I always liked the humor in that – naming a hard core, White racialist NAZI party the
Liberal Democrat Party
🙂
Here in the US – it’s so hard to start a new, successful political party with any name.
Consider just doing a White ethnic cultural group – something like:
Greek American Hellenic society
Italian American fraternal society
Scotch Irish heritage association
There is a very nice Scotch heritage association outside of Chicago that puts on great Highland Games, including Scottish Clan tents. Not the same as the KK Klan, but the event draws tens of thousands 95% White. And we’re all White Scottish for one happy day.
Just some thoughts.
I do think Andrew Y is going to get more, better recruits from straight out Anarchist associations instead from White nationalist non events.
However bad liberals are, at least they want our descendants to be the same species as us.
You have to give them that.
But these transhumanists want our descendants to be another species than us!
That’s far worse.
If someone hates the human species enough to want to get rid of it, they should have the courage to express that emotion by popping a glock in everybody’s mouth and making a brain slushie.
You’re a smart guy, Chuck, and I hope in the future you take a more pro-Human view of when it comes to the genetic engineering issue.
Silver, referring to people who might change the topic of a post in a somewhat inflammatory way, says, “Any pointers on circumventing that obstacle, Cary?” The answer is yes, our little group does have more to say on this issue.
First, to be effective the white voice needs a white-issue context. That’s a huge posting all in itself, but we have defined it elsewhere frequently. Silver is correct to suggest indirectly that the white voice is only part of the equation leading to white authenticity.
Second, arguing about an acceptable label among ourselves is one of the major initial things that groups do as they re-tribalize, so there’s going to be a lot more. In a sense, we are in the process of de-colonizing ourselves from a power-mad, anti-white, invasive, and totalizing force that holds Washington, D.C., in its iron claw. De-colonizing oneself is a toughie….see America in 1776….see France in 1789….see Haiti in 1791…see Mexico in 1810.
With reference to the label “white nationalism,” it is probably important to recall our history. We enjoyed a white nation, more or less, from the Mayflower Compact (1620) until the closing of the west (1890), so we have 270 years of experience in that regard. It’s not something new on this continent.
Third, understanding how to use our name in cross-cultural discourse or, as we call it, in an attackback is something we have all experienced from members of Other groups who have gotten in our face to tell us we can’t name them. It’s equally powerful in our hands oddly enough considering how we are judged by different standards. Nothing like calling a member of another group a supremacist for claiming the right to name us.
Fourth, trouble-makers and disruptors are drawn to this kind of discussion like bees to flowers, and that will never cease. Something that might help would be a requirement for any poster or commenter to state 15-20 words upfront about some action he or she took recently in his or her own community to encourage white Americans to speak out of their white voice in a white-issue context. That would let us know to whom to listen to.
Sorry this is so brief, if OD wants a posting on this, we’d be glad to provide it.
Andrew Yeoman is a great man. He does this for the right reasons and he does so consistently. This is the recipe for happiness and a life worth living. I believe in this truth without an iota of doubt. He doesn’t get discouraged by external pressure (I actually think he thrives on it) and he doesn’t lose his moral focus because of infighting. The petty quarrels are something Yeoman naturally rises above. That is a gift that is inborn. It is heroic just as much as it is genius. He is a grand example for the movement and for each one of us.
If you wanted a reason for continuing, there it is. If you wanted a sense of purpose, look no further.
Thanks.
I was kinda disappointed I didn’t see an update on the laws passed in Arizona and Indiana today. I think you were doing an invaluable service by updating us on the progress of such laws. We all need to be more like Ethan Edwards and never give up.
In any case I think we should call at least an aspect of the movement/party the “NO MORE APOLOGIES” movement. We come from a great cultural heritage, what are we apologizing for? Many of the great innovations in technology, and heck, all fields of human endeavor, were invented by whites. What the heck are we apologizing for? My ancestors were a subject race for many years in Europe and came here for liberty, so what the heck am I apologizing for? Even in the south most of the whites were not slave holders, so what are they apologizing for? Only a few ethnic groups in Europe participated in genocide activities in the mid-twentieth century, and one them claims that it was only a victim of such activities, even though they murdered thousands of Christians in Spain and millions in Russia and the Ukraine – I am not a member of either ethnic group so what do I have to apologize for? Part of the problems of certain ethnic groups and their inability to function in a complex society is that their females have not been selecting for intelligence in the mating game – thats not my fault and I’m not going to apologize or accept responsibility for their benighted decisions. Get people into the habit of shrugging off passive aggressive guilting by our bolshevik enemies.