Non-Violent Extremism: A Nation of Cowards Finally Has Its Conversation About Race


If there was ever any doubt that the liberal establishment is facing a full blown crisis of legitimacy, it can be found in this AP article on the new White House strategy on “violent extremism.”

The liberal establishment is trapped in the confines of its own progressive discursive paradigm. It can’t imagine a world where the priests of BRA have lost authority over the country in the same way that the Soviet Union lost control over its empire when communism was hit by a flock of black swans.

By definition, the liberal establishment is the “mainstream.” If you reject the liberal establishment, you are a “racist” or an “extremist” or a “xenophobe” who needs “multicultural education” and “diversity training.” To be an “extremist” means to be someone who dares to laugh openly at BRA’s tall tale of the world.

Is there such a thing as “non-violent extremism”? An “extremist” who practices “non-violence” as a matter of principle and who does nothing more than “witness” the “hate truth” that BRA’s media systematically censors from our “national conversation”?

It is a disturbing thought to the liberal establishment that someone like Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck could use the playbook of Martin Luther King to sweep them into the dustbin of history. In twenty years, the only thing Rush has ever done to them is sit in his studio and crack jokes about the Drive-By Media.

That’s what we are going to do here. We are going to launch ICBMs from Alabama at the eunuchs in Washington and New York City with “NON-VIOLENCE” and “Return to Sender” stamped on the side of them.

I hope they will enjoy the delicious irony of being held up to their own high standards. The most intolerant people in the entire world are those who scream “tolerance.”

I’ve studied the Civil Rights Movement in great detail … in order to “reverse engineer” the 1960s. I think the time has come for White people to follow its example. The American taxpayer is being sold into slavery to the Chinese to get BRA in return.

Is that fair? I don’t think so.

We ought to practice non-violent witness on them like Martin Luther King and Bob Moses. Ever hear of Carter Strange? Ever hear of “flash mobs?” No one in Washington can even talk about what the “hobbits” have to put up with on a daily basis.

It is EC-10.

These hypocrites claim that we are “violent.” In Barack Hussein Obama’s hometown, 96.8 percent of homicide93.3 percent of rape96 percent of robbery, and 91.8 percent of aggravated assault – 94.5 percent of violent crime in Chicago is committed by African-Americans and Hispanics.

Why are black people in Chicago shooting each other? Why is there so much violence in Rahm Emanuel’s city? Why is it safer to be a soldier in Afghanistan than to walk the streets of Obama’s hometown at night?

Sarah Palin and the NRA make them do it. BRA’s detective Garry McCarthy has connected the dots. Didn’t you hear? It’s all about “the legacy of slavery” … in Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, Detroit, Milwaukee, and Los Angeles.

Eric “My People” Holder said America was “a nation of cowards” for our refusal to have “a conversation about race.” Like it or not, White America is joining that conversation with our dossier, and now the Left will finally get what it has always wanted.

Barack Hussein Obama needs to go back to Chicago to “organize his community.” I think it needs his help.

About Hunter Wallace 12380 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent


  1. I could see a white political movement that mimics the civl rights era tactics of non-violence and civil disobedience. One problem with the WN 1.0 was that they wanted to appear menacing, rather than full of righteous outrage. Their heads were full of thoughts of hot lead and cold steel rather than consciousness of MindWar. This is understandable; America was founded on hot lead and cold steel. Our cutlure did not prepare us for Semitic MindWar because we could always use violence. Violence used to solve everything for us. But now we don’t have this particular tool any more, and we have to learn a new, even more powerful tool.

    I think when Whites are sufficiently disenfranchised and dispossessed enough, they’ll get pissed off and be ready for a white rights movement that turns out people in the tens of thousands. It will inevitably get expropriated and taken over from within, but that’s normal and the process of it’s coming to fruition will be a teachable historical moment for the WN movement to go mainstream again. which is why we have to make sure to take advantage of it and educate a lot of people on the whole story, including knowledge of YKW and to help a new class of White homeschooling MindWeapon families.

  2. Speaking of the MindWar, it’s amazing how a term like ‘extremist’ is now thrown at people who merely want a balanced budget! I forced myself to watch a press conference by Uber-Eunuch Harry Reid where he used the ‘extremist’ tag against the little eunuchs in the pretend opposition. As the article points out, to Cultural Marxists like Reid, any and all opposition, even the most mild, is equivalent to violent extremism. If we laugh and poke fun at BRA and the Emperor’s New Clothes it is just as bad to them if we are Breivik shooting down fledgling Red Guards at summer indoctrination camp. To them there is no difference.

  3. Dutchman,

    It’s good that they are expanding the pool of people considered “outside the bounds” such as the SPLC classifying the American Family Association a “hate group.” Getting called an extremist is losing it’s power over us. We are all extremists now!

  4. Dick Morris calls implicitly labels Obama a black fictional image:

    “The pathetic performance of President Obama in the debt debate is showing the left how incompetent and weak the leader they selected is. Many are wishing they had Hillary Clinton in the White House instead! Once Obama has to move beyond a set teleprompter speech, he is lost. During the BP disaster, he showed what a poor administrator he is and now he has belied any pretensions to legislative skill. He is the un-Lyndon Johnson.”

    The only reason this one term Senator from Illinois was even considered as a presidential candidate is because he was an African-American.

  5. That’s also why Obama will likely sink the whole progressive cause: the Left can’t afford to dump Obama in 2012 because of his special relationship with black people.

  6. This is something I’ve never understood. Blacks are only 13% of the population. Why is it necessary to get the “Black vote” to win an election? Sure, you have to in certain Congressional districts, but why does it matter in a national election?

  7. Interesting bit about foodstamps in Alabama. If the fight comes down to whom to pay: EBT or Social Security, things will get rough i.e. “hot lead, cold steel”.

    NB Forrest said ” put the skeer on ’em and keep it on ’em”.

    Liberals are not brave people.

    We are.


  8. Kievsky,
    I agree, that is a good sign for us that normal concerns have been pathologized to such a degree that even a moderate psuedo-con that just wants lower taxes will be tarred in the media as a psychopath that wants to starve old people and black children.

  9. Anonymous: I’ve asked that same question at least 10 times over on American Thinker in many of their threads. I got one response that it “was the right thing to do”. I countered with “OK then, can you give me an estimate of how much resources (money, time, effort) the conservatives should spend in garndering 13% of the vote”. Of course, no answer. I assume respectable conservatives are willing to spend 100% of their resources on blacks while whites and hipanics can go to hell. I honestly think in the messed up mind of whites, they feel that without a black face and black voters they really have no legitimacy. In other words, doing something because it is good for whites is unacceptable to them. It probably kills them that the RNC is probably 80% white and the Tea Party 95% white. Sad, sad, sad.

Comments are closed.