Federal Judge Blocks Florida Welfare Drug Test Law

Federal District Judge Mary Scriven blocks Florida welfare drug testing law


A federal judge in Florida has blocked the new law that would have required welfare recipients to submit to a drug test.

This comes on hot on the heels of a federal judge throwing out Arizona’s lawsuit against the Obama administration, a federal judge blocking Arizona’s SB 1070, a federal judge blocking the Arizona-style immigration law in the “Utah compromise,” a federal judge blocking Georgia’s Arizona-style immigration law, a federal judge blocking portions of Indiana’s new immigration law, and federal judges blocking several portions of Alabama’s new immigration law.

The SPLC is currently suing Florida, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina in federal court on the behalf of illegal aliens to fight various state immigration laws. In Florida, their goal is to force the state to repudiate its current policy and grant in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens.

A recent CNN poll has found that only 15 percent of Americans trust Washington to do the right thing “always or most of the time.” The previous record low in confidence in the federal government (17 percent) was set in the summer of 1994.

In September 2010, 25 percent of American trusted the federal government to do the right thing “always or most of the time.” That was before the Democrats were blown away in the 2010 midterm elections.

Just a decade ago, 35 to 45 percent of Americans trusted the federal government to do the right thing “always or most of the time.” This means that confidence in the federal government in actually lower in 2011 than it was during the War Between the States.

See also this separate NY Times poll:

With Election Day just over a year away, a deep sense of economic anxiety and doubt about the future hangs over the nation, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll, with Americans’ distrust of government at its highest level ever.

As I predicted last year, the push for new state laws that crackdown on illegal immigration and laws which indirectly target the Black Undertow are a win-win situation for us that we should all be able to support.

(1) It puts our enemies like the SPLC and ACLU on the defensive and forces them to file unpopular lawsuits in federal courts which deplete their resources and corrode their legitimacy.

(2) It polarizes public opinion against the entire political spectrum that could be considered our opposition from agribusiness to Republican oligarchs to “civil rights organizations” to the liberal media and to the Democratic Party.

(3) If we win in federal court, we shift the goal posts. Case in point, the final victory in the Supreme Court on the Hazelton ordinance and the E-Verify system.

(4) If we lose in federal court, we are given a golden opportunity to polarize White people against the federal government and to undermine its legitimacy.

(5) Just by putting up a fight, we attract people to our cause, change the political landscape within the Republican Party on immigration (see the collapse of the Rick Perry campaign), and build momentum to push ahead in the state legislatures with future challenges to the status quo.

As for Florida’s new law that requires a drug test for welfare recipients (66 percent of whom are African-American, Hispanic, or multiracial), Judge Mary Scriven has only issued a temporary injunction. Florida will appeal the decision to the 11th Circuit which is handling Alabama’s immigration law.

We are under no illusions that Florida can survive the 21st century within the Union by playing this silly game of kowtowing before negro federal judges.

These state laws and court battles are useful only insofar as they prove to ordinary people that the system is hopelessly broken, that federal judges make all the important decisions, that America is now in terminal decline, and that a coalition of special interest groups and federal bureaucrats have erected themselves as a tyranny over the people of the Southern states.

The ultimate goal is to destroy the legitimacy of the federal government by shredding the myth that it is “representative” in any true sense of the word. Before we can reach the glorious day that is the dissolution of the Union, we first have to do some consciousness raising and succeed in undermining multiracial democracy.

Note: The U.S. Supreme Court is on the verge of taking a case that could overthrow Grutter vs. Bollinger and abolish affirmative action in college admissions in the United States.

The U.S. Supreme Court will also be weighing in on Obamacare in 2012 and could set a precedent that would restore the Tenth Amendment and overthrow 70 years of liberal jurisprudence.

About Hunter Wallace 12380 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent


  1. Ahhhh! This is perfect. The Mullatress descendant of God Knows Whatever Caucasoid stock, and West Africans, – this “judge” – has decided to “defend” the Little Guy, from Fascist Authoritarians, imposing their Morality.

    Thanks to “Civil Rights” and Affirmative Ackshun.

    Sometimes life is far more flawless than any “art”.

  2. I, for one, don’t at all mind financing the drug habits of illegal mestizos and Congoids. Esp. if a Congoid lawyer-wearing-black-sheet tells me I have to. *sarc*. CF looks toward 30-30 propped against bookcase…First Tuesday in November, 2012. Then: 60 days to Fort Sumter.

  3. CF,

    War is hell. I think General Winter and Major Starvation and Colonel Cholera may take the White side of CWII.

    It never ceases to amaze me how much the FedGov pays out. So many people are on the dole or working for the FedGov in one way or another. One day, I think, it’s going to all go “poof” all at once.

    The US is not covering what’s happening in Greece, but Russian television is. I have Russian cable here for my mother in law. Lots of apartments are empty because people have moved in with one another, 15 to an apartment. Money has literally died there — it’s like the Argentina crisis of the early 2000’s, or the collapse of the USSR.

    But of course here in the US it will be much, much worse when money dies, because of our “diversity.” And the one thing that is most needful — that ordinary Whites band together — that will happen. It will be a cultural sea change, and it won’t go back to this barring another generation of massive prosperity and propaganda. And even then, people will remember.

  4. The thing that really pours cold water on the CWII fantasy for me is Argentina. Argentina has managed not to have civil war, has managed to hold things together, but America won’t?

    There are differences, obviously. Obviously we have a large alien population among us. And obviously, we aren’t Argentinians; we have a long history of prosperity by our own lights and a tendency to set up a new system when the benefits are clear.

    But I see an Argentina-style slide into lower SES, higher crime, etc., followed by a relatively peaceful re-ordering of society as far more likely than CWII or secession.

    IOW, a slow decline vs. a fireworks show. States rights and the enshrinement of new liberties (true freedom of association vs. its pale shadow, freedom of assembly; a renewed and invigorated right to property) should have a good shot though.

    One thing we’ve got going for us is the information flow – it’s going to be impossible to keep ’em down on the farm as long as the information infrastructure remains intact.

  5. Svigor: That large alien and otherwise non-White population within this country makes all the difference in the world.

  6. It occurs that rather than seeing the central powers (globalists) as having to crumble and fall for humanity to progress, we should watch for them to sag and decay. New institutions won’t overthrow them, they’ll just surpass them in energy and strength until the old ones wither away. Food for thought anyway.

  7. Did my post get eaten?

    Discard: yeah but what do they have without the government? Our gov has pretty good chance of negotiating if they see defeat as too likely or victory too costly. What would it really cost them to concede (true) freedom of association and right to property?

  8. At this point it seems to me at least that anyone on the Government’s side left with negotiating power in such a situation (conservative or liberal) would rather have their skin peeled off while hanging by their toes than relinquish an iota of property rights or freedom of association to the white man.

  9. Svigor: The Powers that be are already sagging and decaying, and I think that the states will reclaim their former authority. As it is, most of the states have functioning governments, every bit as capable as most national governments. Michigan, for example, has the raw power to crush any Black uprising in Detroit. Freed of the mass of parasites and predators that afflict them, they could easily maintain their roads and school their children. I don’t see any long term power vacuum in White areas should the central government collapse.
    As for the DC rulers, the Left has gone too far to be able to crawl back, and they know it. Rather than easing off, they are accelerating and hoping to destroy us first. Discrimination against Whites and allowing non-White invasion are only two of the unforgivable crimes they’ve committed. In a showdown between the Fed Reds and resurgent states or regions, what kind of compromise can they offer? A promise to stop committing treason? I would guess we’d see a Saigon scenario, big shots escaping on the helicopters, underlings left to face the music.
    These people are predators or parasites. They absolutely need to feed off us. They are as capable of a peaceable separation as wolves or tapeworms.

  10. She’s a woman, and a Nigrah. She has no biblical or covenantal authority to rule.

    She shall be removed. Deo Volente.
    (This my prayer, and covenant calling down of divine judgment- i.e. liturgy of malediction.)

Comments are closed.