Michigan
I was on the road yesterday when the word got back to me that the day Paul Kersey had predicted would happen in Escape From Detroit: The Collapse of America’s Black Metropolis had finally arrived after a year of the Michigan state government kicking the can down the road out of fear of being tarred with accusations of “racism.”
Note: If something can’t go on forever, it will stop … one day. Yesterday, the D’s financial heart stopped beating and a 40 year experiment in black empowerment was officially declared a failure due to the fatal combination (CIC = C) of crime, incompetence, and corruption that eventually brought about the collapse.
313Chris says:
….If you like kings and aristocracy so much, then go back to England. Americans are free men and women, and we kicked that royal trash out of here a long time ago….”
We are NOT FREE. What planet do you live on? And the “Americans” WERE ENGLISH.
The Irish are too provincial to EVER REALIZE that the “americans fighting royalty” EXISTED OUTSIDE THEIR framework of understanding. It was not the “irish-english troubles.” IT WAS ENGLISH fighting their own.
This was a completely different kind of fight that they do not understand. They came, usually much later—- THEN transferred their own mindset onto the Americans, who were a very different people.
This is why they don’t understand how the “americans” (now meaning the Generational ones) act now. It’s like Kevin MacDonald disabling his comments (LOL) and then going on and on (seemingly at a real loss) about why the Americans population doesn’t DO SOMETHING, (LOL!)
Chris, you are so truly in your universe. Someday, I hope you “get” that other people are not you. (Other white ethnic groups have their own (different) lives, obsessions, memes, concerns, history, gifts, realities, etc, etc, etc.)
What many say: is that Royalty took too much in taxes (more than the foreign jokers in the u.s. government now)—-
And so, if you have to be overtaxed, a lot of Americans would rather be overtaxed by their own (English-German-Scots protestants, or at least, if they have to be French, make them Huegenots)
There’s a “conspiracy guy” Tsarion, and he goes off on how inexplicable the “americans” seem to him. He says, over and over, “They fought the English, so why aren’t the Americans doing anything?” And then he blames their inaction on “being dumbed down.”
Well, many ARE NOT REALLY that “dumbed down.” LOL. They just see their current rulers destroying and taxing and how foreign they look on television— and they would rather (if they have to LIVE IN UNFREE OPPRESSION) AT LEAST have people from their own group visible somewhere.
Their relationship with THE ENGLISH is totally different than the relations other populations have with the English.
England remained the protectorate of America until WWII, (just in a “special relationship). Gordon Brown and Tony Blair and people like that seem to have had their own agendas.
“We”is the operative word really. 1776, who we?
I’ve got family on both sides of that dispute as it turns out. So there you go. Although, whatever really motivated these people? Washington, for example, was the biggest Whiskey distiller in North America. Maybe he fought to defend his monopoly in that commodity. Who is we in this case? their fights are not our fights.
John said,
“Constitutional monarchy at the very least allows for there to be a sleeping giant of nationalism…”
Monarchy is the only thing that genuinely references nationalism (in the real sense of nations).
The Irish in America, for instance, always go on about “americans beat the royals!”— but not really—- we wanted certain things (certain freedoms and our own money), but DID NOT NECESSARILY give up the other aspect of the monarchy, (that it at least references NATION).
That is what a “queen mother” is. That supposed nationalists would not see the value of monarchy is very strange, imo.
Oh wait… it’s only English monarchy that’s bad (and maybe some other places in north or west europe).
Spain has a king and that’s just fine, lol
It’s not unusual for Anglo’s to moan about the royals as Germans of course. So Republican sentiment in the UK can be a sort of nationalism. As much as monarchy is a form of nationalism itself. It does at least assert that the nation has something to Fi with blood.
To do with blood.
Aristotle understood more than two thousand years ago the weakness and dangers of monarchy. His fifth form of government combines oligarchy and democracy with rule of law, and even allows a weak monarchism restricted by the constitution. The American presidency is a weakened, non-hereditary (unless you count the Bushes) monarchy, in fact.
My wild north Wales heritage, perhaps, makes me as resistant to the rule of emperors as the Irish are.
I meant by “perhaps” that perhaps that heritage is responsible for my anti-imperial view, if such genetic determination is possible, as it is claimed of Irish heritage.
Would you care to explain a bit more?
P.G.R.T., the Trotsky characterisation is not far off. Some anti-Christian, anti-democratic white nationalists, supposedly conservers of Western civilisation, are in fact aping Talmudism. There is no middle ground.
Then there is the other, Alpine Frankish-German side. The Swiss and near-Swiss people aren’t king-oriented either.
Since the rails have been torn up and melted down on this conversation I will add my .02 to this CF. In the 90s I took up motocross again, so to make this a short story one day a friend and I decided we wanted to venture East to Michigan to race at Red Bud an excellent track in SW Michigan. So we get there and we are called to practice and I rode my Suzuki up to the gate and I swear the other riders in my class the Michigan natives all looked like parolees. It was one long ass day though my friend finished second and me about dead last.
Lew, when white nationalists reject or step off the Foundation, they become self-destructive, and effectively anti-white, and fall into the anti-Christian behaviour of the Talmudists.
Tip to my fellow whites, when a paycheck liberal throws a stick do not chase it, attack the paychecker with ridicule, personal ridicule+witty denunciation of their crap ideology. The GOP and its hacks have pretty much cornered the stick chasing job market, so we are only one option, win.
DixieGirl says:
March 3, 2013 at 12:40 pm
Jack, why do you think she was Jewish?
She had a paternal grandfather, yes, but her wiki says: “Maddow has stated that her family is “very, very Catholic”, and she grew up in a community that her mother has described as “very conservative…”
I’m not saying no… But supposedly she always has “Dutch protestant” background (that seems more of a stretch, in that seeing her as a Germanic protestant is just impossible, lol)
Jack replies:
I admit that I have no facts on Maddow’s ethnic heritage. I’m relying on my “Jew radar” which tends to be very accurate on these things. After all she’s a pushy, Leftist lesbian who’s been granted media access by the powers that be. If she’s not a Jewess, than she might as well be – she could be like that New York a Rican Supreme Court justice “Sodermyer” ( German Jew name there) or former Clinton Cabinent member Lesbian Lebanese. Donna Shalayla a “Lesbanese”. These types develope in EastCoast Leftist Jew academia where the Elena Kagans hold sway.
“John says:
March 3, 2013 at 2:14 am
If you really truly believe in the constitution, (and the BofR as it exists today) you probably can’t be a race realist deep down. Equality is equality is equality, it’s niggers all the fucking way down to the abyss.”
Wrong! All you need to do is be a little more specific. You include specific language, as in “This Constitution is for White people. No others need apply. No Kikes Nigs, Spics, Gooks, Mystery Meats etc. The rest of you lot want to create your own Constitution – go right ahead. But Our Constitution applies to WHITE People and White People alone. So piss right off”.
Etcetera. There. Done! There’s nothng ambiguoous about my verbiage, is there? Nothing “open to interpretation”?
How could the Founding White Men have even imagined that any White would be lunatic enough to allow their lands, and very psyches, to be so heavily invaded?
I didn’t know that the MadCow had a Hebe in the woodpile. I’m usuaally up on my Joonetics. Makes sense – so did Christopher Hitchens, and Lenin, etc. See how the infusion of Devil DNA corrupts, and corrupts absolutely?
The MadCow was a Rhodes Scholar. Her thesis was all about treating AIDS “victims” (Yu catch AIDS, no for decades, because of what you do.). She met her partner, Susan Mikula, when Mikula hires Madcow to pull up tree stumps from her yard. I read that Mikula is a Jewess some time ago, and now can’t find the source. So I will back off the “Jew until proven innocent” charge – but Mikula identifies as an “artist”, but apparently she supports herself an an accountant.
This is an interesting article about Madcow, filled with all sorts of jewcy tidbits, inclusing a pic of Mikula’s residence:
http://nymag.com/news/media/51822/
Quote that leapt out of first page:
“Rachel, as I knew her, has always been about making a contribution,” says Cory Booker, the mayor of Newark, New Jersey, who was friends with Maddow at Stanford and Oxford.”
I don’t give a tinker’s damn if we have a king, president, or fairy fucking princess as long as they leave me be, leave us secure in our rights, and are themselves subject to the law as we are.
As of now, and since 1860 government has been above the law, free to act as it wishes. We may not have a king in title but we have a government that is in practical terms a monarchy. Thanks you worthless yankee bastards
Jack – Sotomayor is a Hebess. a wee bit of research makes this blindingly obvious
Snyder and the other dude in that first video really need to wipe the stupid smile off their face
Coleman Young became the first black mayor of Detroit the same week that Maynard Jackson became the first black mayor of Atlanta. The looting of Detroit began with Young. Looking at the results of two black mayors, Detroit won or lost depending on how you look at it.
With Rachel’s credentials, in any case, she’s joo enough.
@Stonelifter
Fairy Princess, Fairy Princess!
Though I believe no goverment is preferable to any possible arrangement that can be constructed.
George – agreed. That’s why I referred to her/it as a Shabbos Dyke.
stonelifter takes the correct view.
The correct view? Rudel, please explain how it is correct to not-participate in government at all, not even bother to vote, and not care what kind of government “they give us just as long as “they” let us alone?
Wayne, I hope you end up becoming the Confederate version of Trotsky. If you end up helping a white state get independence and as will inevitably happen you get on the wrong side of your ruler’s paranoia, you’ll be begging for democratic institutions to save you.
If by “democratic institutions” you mean “democracy,” then just say so. If you mean rights, just say so. But nobody said shit about “democratic institutions” but you.
P.G.R.T., the Trotsky characterisation is not far off. Some anti-Christian, anti-democratic white nationalists, supposedly conservers of Western civilisation, are in fact aping Talmudism. There is no middle ground.
I’m not trying to “conserve” the thing that got us here in the first place. I’m trying to save my people.
Oh, and BTW – My mother was a Detroit cop for over 25 years, 10 of which were spent as a homicide detective. Two of her brothers died from drug overdoses, her father used to beat up her mother, and me and my sisters were feral hell-raisers when we were little kids. Damn right my mother sweared a lot.
That explains a lot.
Once I understand a “WN’s” position as “I’d rather lose everything than win something,” (Chris’ and many others’ clearly-stated position here) I understand them to be on someone else’s side.
Whoops, make that something, forgot to close the tag.
Why does it matter what form of govt you have when it puts no undue burden on us, secures our rights and is subject to the same law and to the same degree we are? All manner of governments have done that before becoming corrupt and needing to b replaced
The Rubicon has been crossed an there is no going back to the way thing we’re. Especially when you have to go back 180+ years to get back to what things were supposed to be.
I mean, I wouldn’t dream of seriously telling dwellers of the shithole known as Detroit that they shouldn’t or mustn’t pursue their own future, independent of my narrow territorial interests. I demand reciprocity on that value, and am not allied to anyone who refuses.
I have more respect for commies and libtards who respect the right to self-determination and independence (they are few and far between, but I run into them on a semi-regular basis, so they do exist).
Stonelifter: yeah, give me a government that is limited to 1% of GDP and you can constitute it however you wish, and I’d prefer it to what we have now.
I’d take Kim Jung-Il over the fucks we have now, if all he had to work with was a lemonade stand.
Some kinds of government, such as pure hereditary monarchy, are so dangerous, that even if they do seem to let us alone (laissez faire) now, it is certain we will pay for the privilege later. It is our right and DUTY to take our place in government, at least on the local level, at the VERY least by voting.
” ‘P.G.R.T., the Trotsky characterisation is not far off. Some anti-Christian, anti-democratic white nationalists, supposedly conservers of Western civilisation, are in fact aping Talmudism. There is no middle ground.’ I’m not trying to ‘conserve’ the thing that got us here in the first place. I’m trying to save my people.”
We cannot save our people WITHOUT also conserving our foundation, the ABANDONMENT of which got us here, Svigor.
How’s that voting worked out for you so far?
You also miss the historical fact that free people must constantly rebel against whatever form of govt they have to remain free.
Non-participation in our active social duties Is “what got us here’. We abandoned our duties to our own kind several hundred years ago. The betrayal began Top Down. I am speaking as a WHITE.
Nothing ELSE matters.
Svigor has the correct view.
DC is gone. Good riddance. I wish Iran would nuke DC. I wish some-one would.
It’s all about Local now. Do what you can, on the ground. And voting counts a LOT, locally. Every-one needs to stop making excuses.
All of you spewing “democracy, democracy, democracy” need to read the Constitution and observe how many times the democrazy demon is conjured up. Answer: ZERO. That right there tells you what the framers thought about it.
I am an Anti-Federalist, therefore I have no qualms with some democratic principles on the local level, and some on the State level. The central government should be very strictly curtailed, and senators appointed by State legislatures. Voting in all cases should be limited to those in good standing, who own property and are employed, are at least 25 years old, can pass a reading test and demonstrate familiarity with basic civics, and pay a reasonable poll tax, and who possess a military grade rifle and whose names are on the rolls of the State militia.
One person one vote isn’t pure idiocy, it’s intentional sabotage.
Monarchies are some of the longest running, most stable governments in history. Obviously, not an option for America, although FDR gave it a go.
PGRT and Mosin Nagant: Communism is the fully ripened fruit of democracy, and assures absolute equality. Communism is democracy’s ultimate expression.
“Some kinds of government, such as pure hereditary monarchy, are so dangerous, that even if they do seem to let us alone (laissez faire) now, it is certain we will pay for the privilege later.”
What twaddle. Anyone with even a passing acquaintance with history knows hereditary monarchy is the most stable form of government, based upon the natural soundness of genetic inheritance (anticipating both evolution and HBD). Democracies and republics, on the other hand, are known for their bloodthirsty caprice.
If republican democracy is so great, please explain why being ruled over by a narcissistic, anti-white mulatto elected by semi-literate anti-white yankees and mud peoples is so much better than being ruled over by a white man who has inherited his position along with his race.
The notion of a virtuous republic is a dangerously insane utopian delusion.
Such inherently unstable forms of government inevitably end in a bloodbath of one sort or another. The “Reign of Terror” followed the regicide of the French Revolution, not the other way around.
Deo Vindice
“Anyone with even a passing acquaintance with history knows hereditary monarchy is the most stable form of government”:
Aristotle recognised the weakness and danger of monarchy, and the superiority of the mixed polity combining elements of all other forms of government, especially democracy and oligarchy, with the rule of law, in an elaborate pattern of checks and balances. The American Founders established this best form of government on the largest scale to date, not perfectly, but undeniably.
“Communism is the fully ripened fruit of democracy, and assures absolute equality.”
I thought it began with Talmudic atheists establishing their unequal predominance.
The Czars were decent fellows. They were improving all through the 1880s…
It’s astonishing that history classes don’t side with them. Well no obviously I know who writes the text.
Monarchy is better when it is chastened or limited. The American presidency is a very limited monarchic element. The Czars were infinitely better than Bolsheviks.
“John says:
March 4, 2013 at 6:21 am
The Czars were decent fellows. They were improving all through the 1880s…
It’s astonishing that history classes don’t side with them. Well no obviously I know who writes the text”
Amen John!!!!
Richard III was a tyrant who tortured and murdered plenty of Americans for daring to believe that a man could govern himself better than any king.
Wow, that would make a great plot for a SF movie…..a bit like Highlander.
Fuck you. I know damn well it was George III and so does everyone else. It’s called a fuckin typo, jackass.
And for the record, Banastre Tarleton, known as “the Butcher”, tortured and murdered scores of American civilians and his commanders and his king fully approved of his tactics.
Hereditary monarchy was never a stable form of government. Crack open a biography of Edward II, or Henry VI, or Charles II of Spain, or… Monarchs often fought with the aristocracy and their own family, as well as conscripting most men to fight their feudal wars.
On the other hand, constitutional monarchy hasn’t been so bad for northern Europe.