Offering Us The Poison Apple

March 12, 2013 Jaye Ryan Neocons, Politics 55

Presented for "fair comment", protected by the 1st Amendment
Presented for “fair comment”, protected by the 1st Amendment

Most OD readers are aware of the many false “conservatives,” the neo-conservatives, the RINOs who pretend to be on our side, when instead they work to implement anti-Southern, anti-White, anti-American immigration, crime, and foreign policies, while giving us some form of conservative or libertarian spin that it’s somehow good for us.

If we don’t agree that Third World immigration or some extremely expensive, Jewish-inspired neocon war is really “good for us,” they viciously slander and persecute us as terrible “racists,” in exactly the same way as Marxists, liberals, and hardcore leftists.

These false friends use an insidious tactic called “offering the poison apple.”

Back when Disney Studios was actually run by Walt Disney, the Walt Disney Company produced the great animated movie “Snow White,” which featured a beautiful, innocent, young White girl, who was offered a poison apple by a hook nosed, evil witch of dubious origins. Similar witches in the United States are now offering poison apples to conservatives.

This involves offering us some supposedly “helpful advice,” some type of friendly gift that’s supposed to help our future health, but the gift is always laced with poison. It’s consciously designed to kill us.

Recently, all types of our terrible Democratic enemies like Charles Schumer and RINO false friends like Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio have been offering us advice that conservatives should offer mass amnesty to 11 million illegal aliens. These new Hispanic American citizens will supposedly vote Republican and become model, taxpaying Americans because they are said to have traditional conservative “family values” and are fleeing corrupt socialist nations and so will naturally embrace everything conservative and libertarian, God fearing, free market loving, U.S. Constitution loving Americans cherish.

The correct response from OD readers is “yeah right.”

We’ve been down this road too many times. Black “conservatives” like Gen. Colin Powell and ex-liberals Jews were supposedly embracing neoconservatism and giving up terrible liberalism that just didn’t work. Neoconservative blacks, gays, Jews and Third World immigrants were supposedly embracing American conservative, middle class family values and free markets. The sad reality turned out that Colin Powell was caught wildly celebrating Obama’s election with black African students, the blacks continue to vote 95% Democrat and American Jews continue to vote > 65% Democrat, same as they always have in every presidential election since the 1920s.

This week, the terrible Jewish liberal newspaper, The Washington Post, has appointed a new writer to present an alternative “conservative” point of view. Meet Jennifer Rubin who is so ugly that even Bill Clinton wouldn’t try to have sex with her!

Championing a "Right Turn"
Championing a “Right Turn”

What’s Ms. Rubin’s advice to help Republicans and conservatives  come back to power in America:

1.) Dump any remnants of loyalty to America’s Christian traditions.

2.) Embrace gay marriage and promote women and gays in combat roles for the U.S. military.

3.) Never offer to lead White America.

Jennifer Rubin lectures:

“The question for the GOP, and for conservatism more generally, is if it can defy the stereotype of an intolerant, unsympathetic party of whites. Conservatives shouldn’t be part of efforts to cement those stereotypes… the whole crotchety routine (Forget Hispanics! Kick gays out!) has to go.”

I must reiterate that OD is not obsessed with Jews. OD does not identify every Jewish person in the United States as an active agent of Satan and we recognize and honor regular Jewish Americans who are on balance, decent, good people, decent good Americans, with understandable Jewish loyalties and concerns.

One such person is Lawrence Auster, who does a very concise job of refuting the insane, treasonous immigration rants of The Washington Post‘s court conservative Jennifer Rubin. Auster first quotes Rubin’s insane and treasonous call for open borders immigration in to the USA:

“Rubin: My own view is not unlike Charles Krauthammer … I want pre-1924 rules, which is that basically anyone who wants to come as long as he is not a criminal or a cretin can come in…

Kaus: Don’t you think that if we had your rules, half the world would want to come to the United States?

Rubin: Well, I think it wouldn’t be a bad idea if half the world came.”

Lawrence Auster then takes down this insane and treasonous neocon, one American Jew to another “American” Jew:

“Rubin then goes on to argue that America should follow Israel in this regard. She says that Israel would have “stultified” without the Russian immigrants who came in the ’70s and ’80s, and the same is true of America.

Of course she doesn’t notice that the immigrants to Israel were all Jews. She uses the fact that the Israelis have had open immigration only of their fellow Jews, to argue that America should have open immigration of half the people in the world, of every race, religion, and culture.

Such is the fantastic ethnocentric blindness of Jewish neocons and liberals. They make their own experience a model for others, not seeing the important differences between themselves and others. Thus liberal Jews think that because they are doctors and lawyers and top journalists, blacks can, in the same proportion, be doctors and lawyers and top journalists—and that if that doesn’t happen, there is something wrong with America. Thus they think that because their ancestors immigrated to America and were successful here, all possible immigrants, from every possible background, can also come here and be equally successful. Everything is about themselves. Everything is seen through the filter of themselves.”

Lawrence Auster is apparently dying of cancer, so he will not be around much longer to expose and take down these insane/treasonous immigration rants/poison apple advice of neocons like Jennifer Rubin. My advice is to simply ignore The Washington Post as a worthless rag, fit only to line bird cages and to understand the very sad reality that most American Jews are terrible on the live-or-die issue of immigration. The American Jewish community is by no means the only group pushing for anti-White, race replacement mass immigration in to the USA, but, as they say, if the shoe fits …

50 Comments

  3. If you think for one second that we’re voting our way out of this mess, you are as good as dead already.
    The signs are everywhere. Get yourself and your loved ones prepared.

    Read “A failure of Civility” by Mike Garand and Jack Lawson.

  6. So this Jennifer Ruben wants the Republicans to be all for gay marriage in addition to supporting immigration. Why do both conservatives and liberals think that racial and sexual issues go together? The whole idea of gay marriage was started by a bunch of rich white and Jewish people. Most blacks, Hispanics and Asians oppose gay marriage. Most of my fellow liberals want to ignore this and go along with the gays instead. I choose to follow my racial minority brothers and sisters and oppose gay marriage. Sexual permisiveness is the real cause of our problems; I hope the next pope will advocate a combination of sexual morality and brutal discrimination against rich white people by making sure they are taxed to make things better for the downtrodden working classes of all races.

  7. I don’t know where the WAPO dug this ugly, greasy, big nosed Jew woman up? But, most of these people have glass jaws. A few good well aimed personal shots, and they are down & out. They can’t take the heat. They can dish it out, but, they can’t take it!

    Another example is that fat dago Catholic the “FIX” the political expert for the WAPO—he has a glass jaw. A little criticism and he folds his tent, or takes his ball and goes home.

    They get a little negative feedback and they piss their Catholic or Jew pants. Big nose, greasy, and those type of adjetives work for both Catholics and Jews.

  18. Speaking of Active Agents of Satan, have you heard about the latest kerfuffle regardinf one Dov Hikind. Israeli Assemblyman of Brooklyn? He got caught wearing Blackface at a Purim Party. Whoopsies!

    Click on my name. I did a little article. The embarassing pic is here:

    http://images.search.yahoo.com/images/view;_ylt=A0PDoQ33_z9RVFAAxVeJzbkF;_ylu=X3oDMTBlMTQ4cGxyBHNlYwNzcgRzbGsDaW1n?back=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.search.yahoo.com%2Fsearch%2Fimages%3Fp%3DDov%2BHikind%26n%3D30%26ei%3Dutf-8%26fr%3Dyfp-t-900-1%26tab%3Dorganic%26ri%3D137&w=478&h=269&imgurl=abcnews.go.com%2Fimages%2FPolitics%2Fht_dov_hikind_nt_130225_wblog.jpg&rurl=http%3A%2F%2Fabcnews.go.com%2Fblogs%2Fpolitics%2F2013%2F02%2Fny-pol-under-fire-for-blackface-costume%2F&size=34.1+KB&name=A+New+York+politician+is+under+fire+for+wearing+blackface+for+the+Jewish+holiday+of+Purim+%E2%80%94+in+which&p=Dov+Hikind&oid=8110df39d6f5a43a356ae32323d8726b&fr2=&fr=yfp-t-900-1&tt=A%2BNew%2BYork%2Bpolitician%2Bis%2Bunder%2Bfire%2Bfor%2Bwearing%2Bblackface%2Bfor%2Bthe%2BJewish%2Bholiday%2Bof%2BPurim%2B%25E2%2580%2594%2Bin%2Bwhich&b=121&ni=96&no=137&ts=&tab=organic&sigr=12l8g7ffo&sigb=1399vr76s&sigi=120mp81cp&.crumb=OE7r/YvXTgj

    I hesitate to post this – but it’s a nice compare and contrast to the beauties (excepting the McGraw Mischling) posted by Rudel. They do NOT belong among us…

  20. Caroline got her mother’s looks. Stephanie did not. Caroline’s daughter Charlotte didn’t really, either.

  24. The whole “conservative’ word is stupid.

    U.s. is a race-based state (all you need to know this, is to get a TELL-A-VISION. It’s basically anti-wasp. That got extended to be pretty much “anti-white,” a more recent development.

    Conservative and Liberal—- mean nothing.

    They “split” the platform in ingenious ways. For instance, a “leftist” is “for the environment.” Well, anyone who wants to survive cares about the environment. The “rightest” is “pro life.” Well anyone who wants to survive is pro life. And so on.

  25. @ Catherine Deneuve was a Beauty among Beauties. Flawless. Utterly Flawless.

    Best in The Hunger, living her eternity with Susan Sarandon after offing David Bowie, right?

    Anyway, what is the point? That some catholics were attractive physically? What does that have to do with anything? Physical looks are GREAT, I get that. But other things (history, historical narrative, arts, pre-christian history, history of enemies, culture, religion, and so on) Those things MATTER (at least, seemingly, to non-nationalists.)

    Imo, why nationalism (such as it is) will fail. It seems more like a cover for the aggression of some white groups (who want the proceeds of the creativity of others), telling themselves they “deserve it” because they can steal it. (or whatever.)

    And you can’t LUMP together Rinos like Rubio and Hannity with Generational American libertarians.

    THEIR WHOLE MOTIVATIONAL FORCE is different. Rubio, Hannity, O’Reilly, Biden, (etc) are USERS, and came to u.s. as aggressors (arguing for big government, Romanization of the population through immigration, following Philip Hart Act of 1965, Reagan’s giving pope an embassy, ending separation of church-state, etc, etc.), and functioning as “controlled opposition”

    The Generational American Libertarians are using an argument to TRY AND KEEP SOMETHING (anything!) of what the founders (who they are really connected to, not like a joke)—– tried to set up “For us and our posterity” (which is what the preamble of the constitution says).

    Catharine Deneuve is still just French. Who cares if she’s pretty. She’s not MINE.

    Other europeans don’t seem to understand that concept, ever, of MINE.

    Maybe those years of serfdom and neo-feudalism under the European governments just erased that sense, and also (obviously) of PRIVACY from them. Ownership and privacy seems alien to them. Also, their preists were supposedly so brilliant (the best and brightest), yet they were forbidden to “live,” i.e., to reproduce. They were the best (supposedly) BUT COULD NOT HAVE CHILDREN. Where does that go after thousands of years?

    Anyway—– The Generational Americans must now THANK GOD for what they were able to LIVE before the Europeans came and turned it into a factory-line, militarist, type “Nanny-mommy State.”

    But it will be WORSE if it returns to what the Generational-American-Pioneer stock NEED to live as they are made to do.

    What would people accustomed to being military, or on factory lines, or in feudal states—- DO TO SURVIVE, if the nanny state were now taken away.

    That would be a real problem.

    Best to “bring back” their factories, b/c they are suited to that, and to the military. So more factories and military and hospitals, are what they want to survive.

  26. The most Generational Americans should probably just leave the country now, maybe. There’s just nothing for them to DO under any system that’s on the table.

    They are too creative, self-starting, innovative, like to be “left alone” from all the users, and they just won’t “fit” into the militarist-corporatism, spy statism, communist-think-tanked social controls, or dissimilation-lies atmosphere.

    The whole system (that makes such sense to the “mainstream”) just seems BIZARRE to the Generational Americans (in the country before the revolutionary war).

  27. They did tend to have kids.

    They just couldn’t claim church property as private property on their death.

    Of course they had kids.

  28. And btw:

    Ms. “utterly flawless” from the Polanski movies, also does many things s/a : “In 1972, Deneuve signed the Manifesto of the 343 (Manifeste des 343 salopes, Manifesto of the 343 sluts). The manifesto was an admission by its signers to have practiced illegal abortions and therefore exposed themselves to judicial actions and prison sentences…”

    Her resume is pages like that.

    But hey, she’s pretty.

    SHE IS THE POISON APPLE.

    —and of course they did have kids, John. I know. That’s why all those orphanages that citizens had to pay for were started.

  29. Madonna and Lady Gag are “pretty,” too. Too bad Polanski had been off-shored by their time, since otherwise maybe they could have been in Repulsion. lol Oh wait. They are in Repulsion part deux.

  31. “I must reiterate that OD is not obsessed with Jews. OD does not identify every Jewish person in the United States as an active agent of Satan and we recognize and honor regular Jewish Americans who are on balance, decent, good people, decent good Americans, with understandable Jewish loyalties and concerns.”

    As long as you believe this, HW, YOU are the one offering the few remaining Whites, the self-same apple that the Christ-killers have been offering Europe, for the last 2000 years.

    “His blood BE UPON US and UPON OUR CHILDREN.” [Matt. 27:25] Do you really believe the Bible, if you deny this?

    And, as for Auster, I’ve already spoken to that, or hadn’t you read it?

    “As Lawrence Auster, (a Jew ‘converso’ it would appear, for) whenever he is pressed to decide between his ‘Christian faith’ and/or the race occupying Palestine/Israel…guess which one he chooses, all the time? (Yup, it’s consistently ‘Baruch ata Adonai,’ rather than ‘Dearly beloved, the Scripture moveth us in sundry places to acknowledge and confess our manifold sins and wickedness…”) Auster almost with that sort of ‘I have to tell the truth, even though it damn me/us Jews,’ has noted:

    “If America had known when admitting Jewish immigrants between 1880 and 1920 that the descendants of those immigrants would oppose America’s right to have any future control over immigration, would America have admitted those immigrants in the first place?

    “As a descendant of Eastern Europe Jews, I never would have imagined that to be descended from immigrants requires a person to have more allegiance to future prospective immigrants than to America; nor would most European-Americans who are descended from 19th and early 20th century immigrants imagine such a thing. But many Jews, as well as many Catholics, think otherwise. They think that because they come from immigrants, their sacred mission in the universe is to crusade for open borders and deny any ability on America’s part to have any say about who comes into this country.

    ‘I say that this is a legitimate point to make to the open-borders Jews and Catholics. ‘Was this part of the deal when your grandparents were admitted into America? That the fact that America let your grandparents into this country requires you to subvert America’s national existence? In that case, your grandparents shouldn’t have been admitted in the first place.’ – http://www.vdare.com/pb/060605_gulag.htm

    Auster, (for once in his career) and I are in complete agreement.

    In that the Roman Catholics have been co-opted by the Jews for the last forty years, in the wake of Vatican II, his cavil about ‘open borders’ Catholics is actually a typical Jewish move to deflect criticism from the subject group onto a scapegoat ‘other’ so as to leave the Jewish group alone. Dr. Kevin MacDonald has chronicled this time and time again.

    http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/books.htm

    Reading Auster’s last comments, then (as applicable to Jews, and to Jews alone (since they have been in the forefront of all the social ills this nation has faced, since 1917 on!)

    I think his fundamental question is answered. As to the Jews:

    “Your grandparents shouldn’t have been admitted in the first place.’

    The sooner the West realizes it, and deports them all, without the vast billions of bailouts, property, money, art treasures, capital, real estate, corporations- in short, letting them leave (like rats on a ship) with only the clothes on their backs) – the sooner, the better- is the ONLY ‘Final Solution’ to the malaise of the West.

    As a great saint once noted: “But if the Jews were to say, that the word, “In Isaac shall thy seed be called,” means this, that those born of Isaac should be reckoned to him for a seed, then the Edomites, too, and all those people, ought to be denominated his sons, since their forefather Esau was a son of his. But now so far are they from being called sons, that they are the greatest possible aliens…” – St. John Chrysostom, Commentary on Romans, Homily XVI

    We might as well right this minute see them, and all others not of Christendom’s race and religion, (including the illegal occupant of the Oval Office) as ‘Aliens;’ and stop teaching Multiculturalism, just as we stopped teaching ‘Americanism’ upon the adoption of the anti-immigration bill of 1924 that kept America White, and was the means thereby, which made America the greatest nation on Earth. America for Americans.” – http://thewhitechrist.wordpress.com/2009/06/02/the-keeper-of-bees-a-book-review/

    and more recently,

    http://thewhitechrist.wordpress.com/2013/03/11/a-work-of-god-or-a-snare-of-satan/

  32. Thus liberal Jews think that because they are doctors and lawyers and top journalists

    They don’t believe any such thing. This is an example of the deflection Fr. John was talking about. They will attack any culture they are stupidly allowed in, and allowed freedom, in order to break it up so it can better be exploited by them. Questioning the morality of committing cultural and physical genocide against a people for the benefit of 1 or 2 or 3% of the population never occurs to ANY of them.

    Actually it’s worse than that. In the long run, much like modern Leftism that they made into a White-hating racist movement and lead, they don’t really care if it benefits them. They are driven by blind racist hatred and will work to destroy us even if they go down with us. Look at the Jewish organizations in Europe joining with Muslims to keep the borders open. It’s called target fixation.

    All this flows from their virulently racist religion. If you’re the Chosen People Of God and everybody else, well, isn’t it’s no surprise that you won’t play well with others. And the chief answer to Jews pushing for multiculturalism is integrate your synagogues before you lecture us on tolerance. Until we see plenty of black, brown and asian faces in your synagogues, one of the most segregated public meeting places in the country, you can spare us your kvetching. The beam in your own eye.

  33. We shouldn’t be surprised that this hideously ugly American Jewess Jennifer Rubin has also been publishing Neo Con war propaganda for a US attack on Iran.

    Pat Buchanan outed Rubin for her lying Neo Con “bomb Iran, bomb Iran” “Conservative” war propaganda at the Washington Post.

    http://www.vdare.com/articles/infantile-conservatism

    This this hideous Hebe Hebess (is that a real term?) is pushing all three Jew policies for the destruction of White America:

    1) Invade the world for Israel – endless US wars against Iraq, Iran all Arab/Muslim states that ever say an unkind word about Israel/Jews.

    2) Invite the world – open borders immigration in to the USA, Israel gets a free pass to have Jew only immigration, make Israel a Jewish ethno state.

    3) In hoc to the world, endless US borrowing to pay for #1, and #2.

    Any questions?

  34. Thanks Laura, we corrected the incorrect name of the classic Disney movie.

    Sleeping Beauty and Snow White have similar themes, with very strong racial themes.

    The Southern Nation, our sleeping White American nation is under some insidious spell that has in an un-natural sleep. And yes, modern day witches abound, presenting poisoned apples. This Jennifer Rubin – the “Conservative” alternative voice of the Washington Post is a real witch, sent from central casting.

  35. to Fr. John

    I am the author of this post, not Hunter Wallace. We are two distinct men. Though we both went to SEC Universities in South. Hunter is a 100%, unreconstructed Son of the South. I am a White Midwestern WASP, with some Eastern European Nordic/Slavic noble blood. Hunter and I agree on most issues, including Jewish issues/problems but come at things from different backgrounds.

    That said I stand by my comment on American Jews in this post:

    “I must reiterate that OD is not obsessed with Jews. OD does not identify every Jewish person in the United States as an active agent of Satan and we recognize and honor regular Jewish Americans who are on balance, decent, good people, decent good Americans, with understandable Jewish loyalties and concerns.”

    I understand that Jewish Americans are going to have ethnic loyalties to Jews in Israel, to Jewish people all over the world. I don’t find this fact to be surprising or treasonous. I wish that White Americans had even 1/10 of the ethnic/tribal loyalties to other White Indo European peoples as Jews do to other Jews.

    Jews in America have never supported American wars against other Jewish nations. United States White Gentiles have supported seemingly endless wars/violence/hatred of other White nations/White people since World War I. It’s the same with Black Americans. Would Black Americans support some US war against some Black African nations, divide up over church affiliations to support attacking other Blacks? Of course not. Why do American Whites do this racial/ethnic treason? Sure, Jewish domination of the US media, US politics, US culture is a big part of the problem but the main problem is that most White Americans are dumb goyim and have very little idealism, including racial idealism.

    White Americans main problem is…

    US.

    That said, this lying, ugly Neo Con Jewess at the Washington Post Jennifer Rubin is a real witch offering White Americans the poisoned apple. I encourage everyone reading OD to spread this unpleasant truth to anyone who will listen.

  36. You are aware that Lawrence Auster considers OD to be an “exterminationist anti-Semite” site, and has (most recently, within the past six months or so) refused to even consider any argument or discussion originating here?

  37. Rollory,

    And St. Peter denied he even knew Jesus. What’s your point?

    My point is that anyone who wants to have any type of mainstream writing, media, academic or political career can not publicly admit that he harbors any anti Black, anti Jewish (even the worst of this tribe) opinions.

    I bet Lawrence Auster and many others read and follow OD. I wish him well as he ends this life and finds out what’s next.

    I hope some peope say similar nice things about me when I arrive in LA’s situation.

  38. ethnic jews have loyalty to israel, but all the various White ethics have loyalty to their homeland. The whole immigration thing was a mistake, each group as bad as the last in their own way

  39. @ Jack Ryan:

    Are you suggesting Jonathan Pollard is not a traitor to America for being loyal to the State of Israel? Let’s hope not.
    I do believe what Fr. John is saying is correct. Blood is thicker than water. The life of Christ Jesus is ample proof that the national genetic Jew is bound to murder everyone who opposes him. 2000 years of obstinacy does not lead me to think otherwise.

    “Jews in America have never supported American wars against other Jewish nations”
    What? What other Jewish nations are you talking about? There is only one and it’s about time this country disengaged from them. I mean, really Jack!

    A corrupted Christianity is the problem and certainly the Jews can’t be blamed for all of that. However, I can’t see them praying in thier synagogues for us poor Christians. Can you?

    -M.A.A.

  40. “with some Eastern European Nordic/Slavic noble blood.”

    Every European has noble blood. The odds are something like 99.9999+% that you, me, and the postman are direct descendants of Charlemagne. This is due to the fact that the number of possible grandparents one has doubles with each generation you go back. Conversely, the existing population pyramid narrows in the opposite direction the further you go back in time.

  41. Markus says:
    March 14, 2013 at 2:23 am (Edit)
    @ Jack Ryan:

    “Are you suggesting Jonathan Pollard is not a traitor to America for being loyal to the State of Israel? Let’s hope not.”

    Jack responds.

    No, I understand that Jonathan Pollard was not a true, blue, loyal Americam patriot. Neither were Ethal and Julis Rosenberg, executed for passing atomic weapons secrets to the Soviet Union. And hey guess what, Gen Colin Powell wasn’t a true blue Conservative Black Republican savior – all the time he was pulling for his fellow off Black racial bro Obama. Imagine that! Want to hear some other SHOCKING news? The Gambino Crime Family is an Italian organized crime family involved in crime!

    We need to stop being naive about Jews or racial realities. Jews aren’t that hard to understand. This ugly Jewess Jennifer Rubin appointed the Washington Post court Conservative, she’s really not trying to help White American conservatives. That’s just life and we shouldn’t be shocked.

  42. Dixie Girl,

    I love your posts. I must disagree on the Deneuve rebuttal.

    She is ours. Yours, and mine.

    She’s an actress. Have you ever dealt with Actor Creatures? Some are splendid, but most are raving egomaniacs, which are barely tolerable when they do have brains and talent, and most of them are not very bright at all. Flat out idiots, is the common theme. They make their living speaking other people’s words, and doing what they are told to do. It’s only been in the past few decades that any-one has accorded them ANY social status at all – and it’s alldo to media. And that means Jew. They’ve been subsituted as Role Models, because legitimate social authorities have been corrupted and obliterated.

    The Miasma is wearing off, though. It’s still a long hard slog..but everything the Left – the Jew ad their minions – is crumbling. The Wheels are fallng off. The mis-shappen, badly made wheels are falling off….I see signs of life popping up.

    Catherine Deneuvemade bad movies cause the movie makers are Jews. Overall – they run the film industry. They had to accomodate Christian Gentile tastes. I’ve always bene a film afficianado. I’ve adored movies since I was a wee little girl. You can see the corruption of the Jewish POV creeping in, over the decades. The early Silent movies were wonderful. Griffith was still having a huge influence, and Cecil B DeMille. Films were still excellent in the 20’s. The Thirties were the Golden Decade. The energy shifted during the Forties, when Film Noir began to appear. The Fifities were full bore Social Justice “gritty” Jewish JUNK. That’s when the Trashing of the Goy began in earnest. Check out “A Face in the Crowd” is you want your face smacked. Please bear in mind – there is superb artistry throughout. That’s an excellent work of Art. It’s just anti -Us Art. The Sixties, onward? I don’t have to write a word.

    The thing is – Beauty matters. Beauty moves us. Catherine Deneuve is a classic Celtic BEAUTY. Gallic. Gaul, etc. She IS one of ours. It’s not merely her acting. Or her looks. She’s NOT merely “pretty”. The great stars, of any milliue, have something else. That special radiance.

    I’m not attracted to women, sexually, but I am attracted to luminous beauty. A person, an animal, a place, a flower, a star……Catherine Deneuve was, and still is, a Luminous Beauty. Her persona is always elegant – the height of elegance – alluring, mysterious. She’s a Natural Queen. She is. I don’t know how she got into her profession. I don’t doubt for a second that it was strictly based on her looks. There have been lots of women that were just AS physically beautiful, or even more so, from a purely structural standpoint – but it’s not just that. Audrey Hepburn was European Royalty. ACTUAL blood royalty. Do you ever look at her? She was bone thin. Her facial struture is actually really odd. Extreme angles. It all “adds up” though, and how. It’s all about that innate regality.

    They are both ours. The embody the 14 words. Had we not let hostile, malignant aliens sieze control of our social orders – Denueve most likely would never have degraded herself in any way. She never did, really – she transcends everything. She is Eternal. Be proud of her. She IS your Sister.

  44. He’s still the figurehead of the same old heresy, and heir of a tradition of crime and corruption. Other than that, he may be a better pope.

  45. @Jack Ryan

    Fair enough.

    My point is that Auster wouldn’t reciprocate, were the situations reversed. But that speaks better of you than him.

  46. Robert Carrington, screenwriter of Wait Until Dark, one of my favorite Hepburn films is a good white man. He lives in the countryside now and trades in antique hats. We have tea from time to time. There was still room for good white (non-Jew) talent in Hollywood back in those days. These weren’t ebil peeble making these great films. Who can forget the coach scene from Belle du Jour? Of course Deneuve is a genetic treasure.

  47. Denise—

    You so talk down to others, lol. I won’t “tell all” to qualify for you, but I’ve met people who have been in movies, and others who have worked on non-visible aspects of media, and probably some names you would recognize.

    Maybe that’s why Catharine D’s physical beauty is truly, deeply nothing to me. Seems like what’s external turns your head too much, perhaps. Maybe if you’d met equally beautiful (physically beautiful) people, WHO WERE INTERNALLY beautiful, also, and had had that experience, you would know better.

    And NO WAY—are pple s/a Catharine D merely “Judaized.” She is RESPONSIBLE for the big payoffs she took for doing what she’s done. The fact of Catharine D’s physical beauty MAKES HER EVEN WORSE, since she is more able, through it, to pander poison.

    Her relationship with Polanski, spanning multiple projects—- was one she easily could have rejected, given her talent.

    There are equally beautiful people who care more about their souls.

    Only until around my twenties did people s/a Catharine D move me, due to their physical presence. I grew out of it (no joke). To me, people who work in film, just have a JOB. That’s really all it is. You admire and elevate it too much, imo.

    What’s JUDAIZED is you insisting on seeing Catharine D as Iconic. You seem under the same spell that had her cozy up to Polanski.

    Anyway, maybe I’m just blessed in knowing enough truly pretty people that I started demanding they ALSO be decent.

  48. On a level, I don’t even know about her being a “genetic treasure,” No Man.

    Seriously—- there are BEAUTIFUL people out there (really gorgeous) who are ALSO somehow in their GENES able to reject certain debased experiences.

    Don’t THEY have the better genes?

    Not everything genes DO are immediately visible. I knew an older Estonian who was the spitting image of Catharine D, but she had an incredibly clean life. She was an in her 50s, blonde, 6 foot one, which didn’t stop her from wearing heels, and into organic food and gardening, doting on her grandkids. She was every bit as physically attractive and a “type” as Catharine D.

    People don’t admit it (or often understand it in themselves) but they are attracted to what is debased. They are hard-wired that way, often, from birth. Had C.D. just been a grandma, (in the way of my Estonian friend), people would not much notice her, call her attractive and so on. But that’s all.

  49. Finally—

    Even if people possess that ICONIC quality (this is what you’re trying to express above, which you call “that something else” and so on), they ARE STILL responsible for what they do.

    You can worship them, I guess, and live in admiration of them, but hold them to higher standards then.

  50. @ …..Hunter is a 100%, unreconstructed Son of the South. I am a White Midwestern WASP, with some Eastern European Nordic/Slavic noble blood. Hunter…’

    I didn’t think HW actually had any family in the WBTS on the southern side, which you’d have to, in order to be “unreconstructed.” Thought he said he was half Austrian, with family that came down for the military.

    (Austrian is can mean many things, from German blood, to Hungarian, Slovakian, etc.—usually related to WWI-II exodus from that part of the world)

    That also means probable catholic roots, as the Hapsburg’s didn’t put up with much else, lol.

    Not sure how that adds up to historical southern.

    Not that it matters, on a level, but if he has no ancestors in WBTS Confederate, that would explain some of his choices in the arguments he makes (like overturning what many Southerners watched their elders do, in trying to sustain the “state’s rights” argument).

    HW is committed to overturning the work of those southern ancestors, work they did for many good reasons.

Comments are closed.