Firesale Prices: The Decimation of the Southern Public Domain

By Hunter Wallace

I’ve stumbled across this in multiple sources.

In the late 19th and early 20th century, Northern and European timber companies invaded the South, bought up all the prime timberland at firesale prices, and absolutely decimated the Southern forests, particularly the virgin forests of Appalachia which is one of the most biologically diverse areas in the world. At the time, it was called “probably the most rapid and reckless destruction of forests known to history.”

This excerpt also comes from C. Vann Woodward’s Origins of the New South which is surprisingly frank about how the South was a Northern resource colony after the War Between the States. Woodward even says that the postwar South had returned to the colonial status of 1776 except that the great majority of empire builders in the New South era lived above the Potomac rather than along the Thames:

“The transition from the missionary and political to the economic and exploitative phase of Northern policy is nowhere better illustrated than by a comparison of Federal land policy toward Southern states in the period from 1866 to 1876 with the policy from 1877 to 1888. In 1861 some 47,700,000 acres in the five public and states of the South (Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Louisiana, and Mississippi) or about one third of their area remained in Federal ownership. …

By 1876 Depew’s “sudden opportunities for wealth” in Northwestern lumber were showing signs of depletion, and the clamor for throwing open to unrestricted speculation the rich Southern empires of timber, coal, and iron was becoming irresistible. The voices of the Southern Redeemers, eager for progress, were added almost unanimously to the chorus. “Clearly by 1876,” writes Professor W. Gates, “the southern land question had ceased to be confused with reconstruction issues and had become a problem in and economics and business policy.” An act of that year repealed all limitations, and after some delay the lands were opened to unrestricted cash entry. The Illinois Central Railroad was obliged to run a series of special trains from Chicago to Mississippi and Louisiana to accommodate the speculators, such was the excitement among Northern capitalists. Huge domains were carved out of the rich timberlands and mineral regions of the Lower South. One Congressman of 1876 purchased 111,188 acres in Louisiana; a group of Chicago capitalists bought 195,804 acres; a Michigan firm acting as and brokers selected and located nearly 700,000 acres of pine land; one purchaser from Grand Rapids acquired 126,238 of pine land; one purchaser from Grand Rapids acquired 126,238 acres in Louisiana, to which his company later added well over half a million acres more in the same state. In Louisiana alone forty-one groups of Northerners bought 1,370,332 acres and nine from the South, 261,932 acres. In Mississippi thirty-two Northern groups acquired 889,359 acres and eleven Southern groups bought 134,270 acres. Between 1877 and 1888, 5,692,259 acres of Federal lands were sold in the Southern states. When, in the latter year, under the spur of agrarian alarm and resentment, Southern representatives succeeded in reviving some of the restrictions of 1866, it was too late. “Northerners,” writes Professor Gates, “controlled the best stands of yellow pine and cypress lands and were to reap the benefit by taking the cream of the profits from the rising lumber industry.

Contemporaries with the era of largess in Federal-land sales was a period of state-land sales that far outstripped it in prodigality. With both hands legislators dealt out their states’ lands to speculators. Florida sold 4,000,000 acres at twenty-five cents an acre to a syndicate headed by Hamilton Disston of Philadelphia in 1881. The transaction, attended by illegal practices, uprooted many squatters and left behind it a trail of resentment discernible in a Populist campaign fifteen years later. The sale was a mere priming of the legislative pump. As the Philadelphia Times merrily put it: “The Florida legislature doesn’t want to make anybody feel bad by saying no and so it says yes to everybody.” A Floridian summed up the “land office” business by writing in 1884 that “the three last Legislatures have granted, or attempted to grant to projected railroads … out of a public domain which had never at any time exceeded 14,831,739.04 acres, the enormous quantity of 22,360,000 acres, or thereabouts.” The Carpetbaggers in all their glory could hardy match such deeds.

Texas awoke in 1885 to find its vast public domain virtually exhausted, including the half of the huge holdings dedicated in 1875 to the public-school fund, which had “not received by ten or twelve million acres the half of the public domain thus dedicated.” It was revealed that under Democratic Redemption rule “frauds covering immense quantities of these lands have been committed …. a Democratic commission’s investigation showing fraudulent sale of 700,000 acres in two or three years.” In all, Texas granted to twelve railroad companies a total of 32,400,000 acres, an area larger than the state of Indiana.

Entering along the railroads and joining them in the profitable business, Northern lumber syndicates sliced wide swathes through Southern forests, stripping them of timber. This happened, for example, in the “backbone grant” of the Texas and Pacific Company in Louisiana. Lumber production in Louisiana increased in value from $1,764,644 in 1880 to $17,408,513 in 1900. In the five Gulf states the increase in that period was from $13,068,353 to $75,077,050. Early warnings against denuded forests and irreparable race were brushed aside was “immeasurably stupid” by a Tennessean in 1886. “Such stuff, if taken seriously would leave all nature undisturbed,” was the argument. “As for these investments of Northern capital, the South is glad to have it come … We welcome the skilled lumberman with the noisy mill.” The work of the noisy mills was thorough. Twenty years after this welcome was extended, a government forest expert pronounced the result in the South “probably the most rapid and reckless destruction of forests known to history.”

Of the splendid hopes of developed resources by which the Redeemers had justified their support of the Federal land law of 1876 little was heard in later years. The Redeemers soon found the South returned to a status comparable with that occupied prior to 1776, though the great majority of the new empire builders lived north of the Potomoc rather than along the Thames.

A surprising number of them, however, did live along the Thames. So active were English investors in the region that for a time it seemed as if the mother country, after a lapse of a century, were about to renew an old relationship with the South. One English syndicate bought 2,000,000 acres of the Disston purchase in Florida in 1881, and a Scotch company took up a half-million acres in the same state. Phillips, Marshall and Company of London purchased 1,300,000 acres located mainly in the Yazoo Delta from the State of Mississippi in 1881. General Gordon served as broker extraordinary in the transaction. It was reported from London that “nearly all classes are interested in the scheme – noblemen, members of Parliament, country squires, journalists, army and navy officers. Government officials favor the enterprises, as they will afford a good outlet for what they regard as pauper emigration.” The following year an English company purchased 4,500,000 acres in western and northwestern Texas, and a member of Parliament for Peterborough bought 311,00 acres for an English company in the Texas Panhandle. “Foreign capital is pouring into the South at an unprecedented rate,” observed a Philadelphia journal in 1883. “Not since the fiasco of the Emma Mine” in the seventies had there been anything like it. The London Standard believed that “the time of the South has come again,” and reported that in London “company after company is being organized for the exploration of the old Southern States.”

None of the English ventures equaled that of the North American Land and Timber Company, Limited, as a colonizer of the New South. It was organized in London in 1883 under the chairmanship of a member of Parliament. In combination with other English companies, it bought more than a million and a half acres of unsettled land on the Louisiana Gulf Coast between Vermilion Bay and the Texas border at 12 1/2 to 75 cents an acre.”

Here’s an except from John Alexander Williams’ book Appalachia: A History which shows how West Virginia was an extreme example of how Northern timber companies raided the South after the 1870s:

“In a generation that saw rapid change, the greatest change of all was the disappearance of the Appalachian forest. As late as 1870, two-thirds of West Virginia was covered by old-growth forest, amounting to at least 10,000,000 acres. By 1900, this figure had been reduced by half; in 1910, by more than four-fifths. The virgin forest was gone, except for a pathetic remnant of a few hundred acres, by 1920.”

By 1920, Northern timber companies had clearcut virtually the entire state of West Virginia, destroying pretty much all of the Appalachia virgin forest there.

About Hunter Wallace 12380 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent


  1. Interesting… capitalism interests have always been more important than mother nature, I like greenery myself, could not live in the desert. What happened to southern forest then is happening in Brazil now. An utter shame. I appreciate those diverse topic of discussions by the way. Keep it up.

  2. The ancient Southern forest must have been majestic. I’ve seen a few remaining patches, of the pines at higher altitudes, and you really can’t describe them. The mixed hardwoods at the lower altitudes really can’t be imagined either because of the Chestnut blight, which destroyed what loggers didn’t get.

  3. Since Hamilton Disston has been mentioned, I’ll provide links to the Wikipedia articles about him, his father, and their company:

    Tacony, the neighborhood where the company ended up, is at the Delaware River side of the former Oxford Township, where, as I recently mentioned here, at Occidental Dissent, my own part of northeast Philadelphia is located (though I’m at the opposite—i.e., the western—side of the territory). Not too far from my desk, where I’m typing this, is Disston Street, on which lived my fifth-grade elementary-school teacher. Though she wasn’t a specimen of Southern charm, her voice had an exceptionally-mild Southern lilt, with which she explained to us, her students, that her hometown was to be pronounced not “New Or-leenz,” but “N’orlinz.”

  4. They did the same in No Wisconsin a magnificent species of pine was made extinct. But all materialists end the same way it is just capitalism is more efficient at it than central planning.

  5. Along the Atlantic and Gulf Coast, there were company towns that moved south from the Carolinas and then west to Texas cutting down the longleaf pine. I know in Alabama that it was primarily non-unionized blacks who were used as a cheap labor force.

  6. PS In that Southern lady’s classroom, in November 1963, my fifth-grade schoolmates and I heard the announcement that President Kennedy had been shot. By the time I was racing up my front walk with the news, tears were streaming down the face of my mother, who was holding open our front door for me. “He’s dead,” she sobbed.

    About two-and-a-half months later, of course, the Beatles first appeared on Ed Sullivan. As I myself watched them with excitement, I did not see that the old America would now pass away.

    Trump 2016.

  7. In the day I had a friend from Wyoming, old Wyoming descended from some of the first sod busters post Indians and he hated with a passion the Limeys, loathed them. That stemmed from their open range operations of looting the grasslands with large herds of cattle and driving off the little guys, sound familiar?

  8. Same thing happened here in the Ozarks. Vast pine forests cut down, for railroad ties, etc. They called it “tie whacking”, Ive heard.
    its taken most of a century for the forests to grow back. And the ecology of them was altered. Because of the gravel eroded into streams, the riverine habitat was altered. The Ozarks has many native fish, and amphibians, invertebrates, etc, found nowhere else, and many of them suffered a lot from the loss of tree cover. The local folks of course got little of the benefit, except some very dangerous jobs, and little pay. There are still stumps in the woods 3 to 4 feet across in some places rotting away. More hardwoods now white, red oaks, maples,etc. Less big pine. Lots of pine, just not huge ones anymore.
    Greed has wrecked so much in the world.

Comments are closed.