Spilling The Beans: Heidi Cruz Is A New World Order Globalist

The feud between Ted Cruz and Donald Trump over Heidi Cruz continues to escalate and “the beans” will probably drop before this article is published:

“DANE, Wis. — Donald Trump’s ability to roil the presidential race with a few swipes of a smartphone was revealed again in Wisconsin. Before a visit to a factory, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) — the only Republican currently stumping here — had to field questions about the week’s second late-night Trump tweet that mocked the senator’s wife Heidi.

“Our spouses and our children are off bounds,” Cruz said. “It is not acceptable for a big, loud New York bully to attack my wife. It is not acceptable for him to make insults, to send nasty tweets — and I don’t know what he does late at night, but he tends to do these at about 11:30 at night, I assume when his fear is at the highest point.” …”

The PAC has no relationship to Cruz, but on Tuesday night, Trump warned that he would “spill the beans” about Heidi Cruz; on Wednesday night he retweeted someone who compared an unflattering photo of Mrs. Cruz to a glamorous one of Mrs. Trump. …

“It’s not easy to tick me off,” Cruz said. “I don’t get angry often. But you mess with my wife, you mess with my kids, that’ll do it every time. Donald, you’re a sniveling coward. Leave Heidi the hell alone.”

Ted knows what is coming and has already deployed his “how dare you attack my poor innocent wife, that’s so out of bounds” defense.

Heidi Cruz is the key to understanding the phoniness of Ted Cruz’s whole campaign. It is obvious to everyone why Trump married Melania – she’s a model, a clear “ten” – and a beautiful woman usually complements a rich and powerful man. Heidi Cruz, however, is Ted’s political and ideological soulmate. Unlike the Trumps, Ted and Heidi Cruz are a partnership like Bill and Hillary Clinton were in the 1990s.

The fact is, “Outsider Ted” met Heidi Cruz in 2000 while BOTH OF THEM were working as young policy wonks on the George W. Bush campaign. After George W. Bush became president, Ted and Heidi got married and BOTH OF THEM worked for W. in an official capacity on trade policy. Ted worked for the Federal Trade Commission while Heidi worked as a top deputy for U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick.


In 2004, George W. Bush was running for reelection and a book was published defending his “agenda of compassionate conservatism” called “Thank You, President Bush: Reflections on the War on Terror, Defense of the Family, and Revival of the Economy.” You can buy a used copy on Amazon for 1 cent. BOTH Ted Cruz and Heidi Cruz penned essays in this book in which they defended George W. Bush’s policies. Ted’s essay, “The Rise of Opportunity Conservatism,” foreshadowed the theme of his Senate career.

Heidi Cruz wrote an essay in this book called “Expanding Opportunity Through Free Trade.” Once again, Heidi was chosen to defend George W. Bush’s free-trade agenda:

At this point, it is already clear that Ted Cruz and Heidi Cruz are regarded as an EQUAL PARTNERSHIP within the George W. Bush administration. Indeed, Heidi has already leapfrogged from the Bush administration to Wall Street in no small part due to her former boss, Robert Zoellick, who moved on to Goldman Sachs, then later to President of the World Bank, and later still back to Goldman Sachs. Heidi, too, would soon join Zoellick at Goldman Sachs which she remained until Outsider Ted launched his presidential campaign.

In the essay, Heidi Cruz waxes forth about the “extraordinary” accomplishments of the Bush administration in implementing its free-trade agenda. She talks about how Robert Zoellick implemented the free-trade strategy “with no less than surgical precision”:

“The strategy consists of a few key ideas: making trade policy consistent with our values as a nation, selling the benefits of trade while helping people deal with the challenges of change, building coalitions for trade and creating leverage in negotiations to maximize the opening of markets around the globe, enforcing the rules of the global trading system and defending America when others don’t play fair, and using trade to improve standards of living around the world.”

The Zoellick free-trade strategy was to make American trade policy “consistent with our values.” And what are those values?

“In November 1999, President Bush outlined his foreign policy objectives in a speech given at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, California. In that speech, he details the values America lives by: human freedom, democracy, free movement of people, capital and information mobility, optimism, dignity, and opportunity for all. Trade was at the center of how these values would be expressed in his Administration: “I view free trade as an important ally in what Ronald Reagan called ‘a forward strategy for freedom.’ The case for trade is not just monetary, but moral. Economic freedom creates habits of liberty. And habits of liberty create expectations of democracy.” Seattle lacked this connection to an overarching set of principles that would define what was good for the global trading system and what was in America’s interests.”

So, the “values America lives by” are the “free movement of people” and “capital and information mobility.” In other words, the free movement of labor and capital across national borders. Hold that thought.


Fastforward to 2005: an Independent Task Force releases a report sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations called “Building a North American Community.”

Heidi Cruz is a member of the Independent Task Force and ENDORSES the report and its recommendations:

“I support the Task Force report and its recommendations aimed at building a safer and more prosperous North America. Economic prosperity and a world safe from terrorism and other security threats are no doubt inextricably linked. While governments play an invaluable role in both regards, we must emphasize the imperative that economic investment be led and perpetuated by the private sector. There is no force proven like the market for aligning incentives, sourcing capital, and producing results like financial markets and profit-making businesses. This is simply necessary to sustain a higher living standard for the poorest among us – truly the measure of our success. As such, investment funds and financing mechanisms should be deemed attractive instruments by those committing the capital and should only be developed in conjunction with market participants.”

Here are some highlights of the Council on Foreign Relations report endorsed by Heidi Cruz:

“To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that ‘‘our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary.’’ Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly, and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America. …

Our economic focus should be on the creation of a common economic space that expands economic opportunities for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital, and people flow freely. …


• Lay the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America. The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.” ..

To make the most of the impressive pool of skill and talent within North America, the three countries should look beyond the NAFTA visa system. The large volume of undocumented migrants from Mexico within the United States is an urgent matter for those two countries to address. A long-term goal should be to create a ‘‘North American preference’’—new rules that would make it much easier for employees to move and for employers to recruit across national boundaries within the continent. This would enhance North American competitiveness, increase productivity, contribute to Mexico’s development, and address one of the main outstanding issues on the Mexican-U.S. bilateral agenda.

Canada and the United States should consider eliminating restrictions on labor mobility altogether and work toward solutions that, in the long run, could enable the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico as well. …


• Expand temporary migrant worker programs. Canada and the United States should expand programs for temporary labor migration from Mexico. For instance, Canada’s successful model for managing seasonal migration in the agricultural sector should be expanded to other sectors where Canadian producers face a shortage of workers and Mexico may have a surplus of workers with appropriate skills. Canadian and U.S. retirees living in Mexico should be granted working permits in certain fields, for instance as English teachers.

Move to full labor mobility between Canada and the United States. To make companies based in North America as competitive as possible in the global economy, Canada and the United States should consider eliminating all remaining barriers to the ability of their citizens to live and work in the other country. This free flow of people would offer an important advantage to employers in both countries by giving them rapid access to a larger pool of skilled labor, and would enhance the well-being of individuals in both countries by enabling them to move quickly to where their skills are needed. In the long term, the two countries should work to extend this policy to Mexico as well, though doing so will not be practical until wage differentials between Mexico and its two North American neighbors have diminished considerably.”

The ultimate goal of “Building a North American Community” here could not be more clear cut: dissolving the borders between the United States, Canada, and Mexico and integrating their capital and labor markets.

Fastforward to 2012: Ted Cruz bankrolls his Senate campaign with an undisclosed loan from Goldman Sachs.

“As Ted Cruz tells it, the story of how he financed his upstart campaign for the United States Senate four years ago is an endearing example of loyalty and shared sacrifice between a married couple.

“Sweetheart, I’d like us to liquidate our entire net worth, liquid net worth, and put it into the campaign,” he says he told his wife, Heidi, who readily agreed.

But the couple’s decision to pump more than $1 million into Mr. Cruz’s successful Tea Party-darling Senate bid in Texas was made easier by a large loan from Goldman Sachs, where Mrs. Cruz works. That loan was not disclosed in campaign finance reports.” …

A review of personal financial disclosures that Mr. Cruz filed later with the Senate does not find a liquidation of assets that would have accounted for all the money he spent on his campaign. What it does show, however, is that in the first half of 2012, Ted and Heidi Cruz obtained the low-interest loan from Goldman Sachs, as well as another one from Citibank. The loans totaled as much as $750,000 and eventually increased to a maximum of $1 million before being paid down later that year. There is no explanation of their purpose.

As Ted Cruz himself explains it, the decision to launch his Senate bid was a joint enterprise with Heidi. A week after Ted is elected to the US Senate, Heidi is promoted to a managing director at Goldman Sachs:

“About a week after Texans elected Mr. Cruz to the Senate in 2012, Goldman announced Mrs. Cruz’s elevation to its ranks of managing directors — a well-deserved promotion, colleagues said. …”

Fastforward to 2016: The New York Times reports that Ted has no more vital supporter than Heidi who is a partner who sacrificed her own ambitions to further his political career:

“Indeed, as Mr. Cruz emerges as a top contender in the Republican presidential field, there is no more vital supporter than his wife — the high-achieving partner who sacrificed her own ambitions, at considerable personal cost, to advance her husband’s.

“God leads you to where he can use you the most,” she said in an interview last week. “And it may not look exactly like you’d expect.”

Her background in finance has proved useful: Quite at ease asking for large sums of money, Mrs. Cruz makes as many as 10 calls a day seeking the maximum contribution couples can make to the campaign.

“The $10,800 contributions is my lane,” she said.”

Remind you of anyone? Yeah, Hillary.

Now Heidi spends her time handling the “10,800 contributions lane” for Outsider Ted’s campaign. She is using her Wall Street contacts to get the big donors to write huge checks. In February, Politico reported that 4 out of 6 top donors are financing Ted.

How unfair of Donald Trump to point out that Heidi Cruz is an EQUAL PARTNER who has always played a key role in furthering Ted’s political career! How unfair to point out that Ted is married to an open borders, free-trading globalist – who wants to merge the United States with Mexico – and who works for Goldman Sachs which conveniently financed Outsider Ted’s launch into the US Senate!

About Hunter Wallace 12380 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent


    • Trump may very well be a man on a real mission. In the first link, check out the fourth paragraph from the bottom in the article in the Jewish Journal (2/19/16) “In December, Trump announced he would be traveling to Israel to meet
      with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, but he canceled it after
      Netanyahu rejected his plan of banning Muslims entering the United
      States.” Now that is not what we were told.


      Perhaps the flood of Muslims into the West has two parts. One is to create warfare in white nations (whites are the greatest threat to the NWO) and the second is to depopulate the lands (and surrounding areas) needed for Oded Yinon’s Greater Israel Plan:


      Remember what Henry Kissinger had Cindy Adams print in the NY Post (2012) “In 10 years, there will be no more Israel.” Maybe “Greater Israel” Henry?

      • Bean counters: Just as Kissinger annointed and appointed Mandela, Swiss bank accounts the Tribal lobola

        Yep, The Tribe has spoken, and you called them out, Snowhitey, hidden hands upon every land, ye can be sure they pay and play every politician, the others they remove in Kennedy ways.

    • Whore of a wife? Seriously! She’s been married once, not three times, and she’s not a porn star unlike Trumps wife. She was on the board of the CFR for three months where as she wrote ONE paragraph in a dissent about capitalism for the people with little government involvement. Hardly a globalist. The disgusting comments left by people like you only shows your ignorance

      • Your evidence that Trump’s wife is a porn star is what, exactly?

        As for Heidi the Globalist Whore, the context of my comment should have indicated to you that I was not speaking about sex, but about the prostituting of oneself to sinister forces, which is precisely what Heidi the Globalist Whore has done.

        You can try and minimize it if you want, but her participation in CFR and in the report, upon which her signature is found, will not work.

        Moreover, she is a Goldman Sachs whore as well, which makes it worse.

  1. Wonderful investigative journalism, Hunter. Far more substance than anything I’ve read up to this point by the mainstream media on the subject of Heidi Cruz.

    • Heidi was on the board of the CFR for three months where as she wrote ONE paragraph in a dissent about capitalism for the people with little government involvement. Hardly a globalist! This article couldn’t be further from the truth.

      • Per the article above, Heidi Cruz is a CFR, bush administration, and Goldman Sachs policy wonk. She is, by definition, a globalist.

    • Still believing a newspaper put out by jews who hate the man? Yeah, as if anything they say is true! Stop believing anything told to you by the jews.

      • It’s a good point, Ranger – but, the fact that Mr. Trump is threatening suit over his delegate loss, leads me to believe that there is something more substantial to this story.

  2. Sir,

    One thing on this important article you have written. It is clear to me, from the evidence that Senator Cruz and Miss Heidi are not one and the same, on every issue.

    And, as Mr. Trump has felt free to change a lot of his positions, Senator Cruz has changed his position on TPP, which, if I do recall, was the source of great vexation for you.

    I understand you do not like Senator Cruz, but, if he is president, it will be, all in all, the most sympathetick president The South has had, in Pennsylvania Avenue, in a coon’s age.

    Just the 3 or 4 Antonin Scalias, that a President Cruz would pick for the Yankee High Court, in his first term, would have a profoundly positive effect, on our Dixie, over the coming 25 years, should we still not secede in that time.

    • The question is who is Cruz lying too? Is he playing the globalists to get elected? Or is this “conservative” stuff just for “Brad and Janet” and “Joe Buck” in Mormonistan, Cowboytopia, and Evangelica? Even Trump supporters still fear he’s “too good to be true,” does that apply to Ted as well?

      • Dear Nightowl,
        I have a rule. I always believe a man, until he proves, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that I cannot.

        I believe that Mr. Trump is so brutally candid that, to believe that he is a liar, is improbable. Mr. Trump’s personal defects are on display for all to see – and dishonesty ain’t one of them.

        The same for Senator Cruz – the man told the people of Texas his values, and then, did not change during his time in Washington.

        I have no reason to assume that either of these men are purposefully misleading all of us as to how they truly believe.

    • Junius,

      I don’t believe Cruz has had anything resembling a sincere change of heart on trade policy for three reasons:

      1.) In the last debate, he claimed that the Smoot Hawley tariff caused the Great Depression.

      2.) In the last debate, he defended his position by saying he supported Trade Promotion Authority, not the Trans-Pacific Partnership. TPA allows free-trade agreements to pass the Senate without a filibuster.

      3.) Heidi went on a radio show in South Carolina before the primary and explained that Ted had always been a free-trader.

      • Thank you , Sir, for your very kind reply.

        I heard and saw him say that he had changed his mind on TPP TPA, (I’m not sure) in a televised interview, yesterday. I liket that.

        That said, I am sure that his attitude towards free-trade would have to be libertarian, as he is Reaganesque.

        My concerns are that free trade take place in more fair circumstances. I think Mr. Trump and Senator Sanders are the best in this regard, though, I am hoping that Senator Cruz improves his approach to this.

        I wish that Mr. Trump had Senator Cruz’s attitude toward small government and strict constitutionalism, and that Senator Cruz had Mr. Trump’s instincts for foreign policy and his attitudes towards trade.

        I still stick with my prediction ; Mr. Trump will win the primary, but, NOT be the nominee.

        I expect to see Mr. Trump on a 3rd party ticket. I hope he, or Cruz, have the savvy to launch a liberal 4th candidate, so that Miss Hillary has to contend with drippage, as well, otherwise, she will be the president of the Yankee empire, and things will head towards a civil war.

        Best regards to the missus and the kid, Junius.

        • Thanks, Junius.

          It is dishonest because TPA takes away the power of the Senate to filibuster free-trade agreements. By saying he supports TPA but opposes the TPP, he is saying that the Senate should be to pass the TPP with 51 votes, which absolves him of paying the price by having to support it but otherwise ensuring its passage.

          That’s what I have the most about Cruz … his duplicity. Another example of this is amnesty where he supported legalization without citizenship.

          • I see. That’s very unpleasant news, though, something about your remarks has the ring of truth about it. In other words, it’s a lawerly political posture.

            I guess that, in the end, no matter what, it will be nowhere as good as Southern secession; which, though ever more of our countrymen seem to be awakening to that notion, and Texas ever more creeping towards it, is not yet at critical mass.

            We are both forcet to engage in the Yankee government elections, but a certain ennui, still possesst by our own.

            If Miss Hillary wins, though, against my prediction, secession will come about, one way or the other. This country will break apart under a 3rd Obama term.

            Happy Easter!

        • I predict he will win the nomination for the following reasons:

          1.) The Northeast votes in April and Cruz and Kasich won’t be able to stop him there in a divided field.

          2.) Wisconsin is a proportional state. Even if he loses, he still wins delegates.

          3.) Of the remaining states, we can write off Montana, South Dakota, and Nebraska. There are enough delegates in the remaining states to get Trump very close to the nomination.

          4.) Finally, there are around 150 or so unbound delegates, and Cruz and Kasich would have to lock up virtually all of them to stop Trump from getting the nomination even if he is short of 1237.

          • Sir, I agree that Mr. Trump is about to win a stack full of delegates; that he will be the clear winner in all northeast states.

            Governor. Kasich, however, will win 75-150 delegates, in that region – which WILL have an effect on the coming convention.

            The 3 will head out west, with Mr. Trump at 1063 delegates.
            Mr. Cruz will put on a big display – winning California.

            They will come into the convention with Mr. Trump having ostensibly 1157 delegates. In fact, Mr. Trump will only have a little over a thousand, because Senator Cruz and Governor Kasich’s teams will have taken away 10-15%, in the behind the scenes work.

            Sir, Mr. Trump will NOT WIN on the 1st ballot.

            Mr. Kasich (with 350 delegates will be a factor, as will Mr. Rubio (150 delegates) – they, both, delivering their delegates to someone OTHER than Mr. Trump. Then begins the skullduggery : the long & the short of it being that someone OTHER than Mr. Trump will be the GOP candidate.
            Who that will be, I have, as of yet, no premonition.

            President Obama will issue a presidential pardon to Miss Hillary, and she will campaign on – attempting to woo disgruntled Sanders’s supporters; they balking.

            Mr. Trump will bolt to a Bull Moose Candidacy, as will an odd array of Republicans, Reagan Democrats, Sanders’s supporters, and a strange mix of the never before having voted.

            Because of this, Mr. Trump will win a narrow election – without a plurality ; at which point, the national media commits suicide, and President Obama goes into a rehab, for electrick shock therapy.

            Sir, I found your prediction interesting. I thank you, kindly, for having taken the time to gab with me. It always improves my spirits, however, good or bad they may be.

          • Sir, I had to change a couple of things, here – chiefly my prediction for who shall win the general election, in November.

      • I was surprised to hear Larry Kramer on the radio Saturday have a guest economist on who questioned Free Trade. He basically said forget ideology, it’s destructive to be running all these trade deficits year in year out for an advanced economy because we are now to the point we are selling off our physical assets to keep this lopsided arrangement going. Gone are the days of China buying up treasury debt bonds, they are now buying up real estate and Americans are going to have a new red Chinese landlord to pay rent. Trade deficits only make sense for a newly emerging economy when the deficit is capital investments to build up an infrastructure that will pay dividends in the future, in our economy it is a sign of deep sickness and insane leadership to permit this.

  3. Mexico is not even fully under the control of the central government, border areas are chaotic almost as bad as Pakistan’s Tribal areas. There are bandits who might rob you should you decide to drive down to Mexico City, this country is nothing like the other two, merging together would require a massive display of force by the US within Mexico that both Mexicans and our liberals would never tolerate, the “colonialism” both so rag about that brought some civility to the world before white people wimped out and abandoned it to native mismanagement. No doubt Mexicans would be able to show up in US/Canadian cities and be first in line for a job and protected by the authorities. Americans however who wished to go expat in Mexico even at lower pay would face discrimination at every turn even if on the books Mexico “pretended” to reciprocate. I’m surprised that the Trump campaign hasn’t exposed this globalist bitch we’ve been reading about since the fall. Cruz does still seem to do well in cowboy states where ranching, mining interests don’t seem too threatened by Free Trade and globalists, but this narrative should knock some more points to Trump in the rest of post industrial America.

    • I use to travel in Mexico all the time without worry.The reason Mexico is so dangerous now is the illegal narcotics trafficking. This was given a big boost by the NSC and CIA’s Contra resupply network in the 1980s. After Congress removed NSC and CIA financing for the Contras with the Boland Act. These agencies started using illegal narcotics to fund the Contras, as documented in “CIA: Crime Incorporated of America”. The narcotics trade has increased in Mexico ever since. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B013RJEJ20

  4. Elections for many years have been nothing more than charade contests between one group of anti-White globalists versus another. Who wins or loses really didn’t matter.
    Then along came Trump, a wild card, something the global crowd hadn’t figured on. Is he really a friend or just another politician that will be bought off? That is the question.

  5. Thank you for this well researched post. I like “Maverick Ted” better than “outsider Ted” but only because it evokes our last pathetic sellout “maverick.”

  6. “Building a North American Community” here could not be more clear cut: dissolving the borders between the United States, Canada, and Mexico and integrating their capital and labor markets.” Only the latter is accurate and only partly. Besides Cruz and wife recanted these views more or less: http://theconservativehistorian.com/wordpress/2016/01/21/debunking-the-cruz-myth-on-globalization-surrendering-u-s-sovereignty-to-a-north-american-economic-and-monetary-union/

  7. If Cruz was actually (and fraudulently) nominated Republican candidate for president, he possibly could be disqualified by the half dozen lawsuits questioning his eligibility. Also Hillary Clinton could be facing Federal indictments which could disqualify her, There are 3 different FBI probes into possibly criminal activity on her part, (1) Emails, (2) the Clinton Foundation, (3) other possibly criminal acts. However, she may be protected by the CIA and the White House controlled Justice Department because President Obama, Bill Clinton, and Hillary Clinton are all deep cover CIA agents, as documented in the book, “CIA: Crime Incorporated of America”.

    • Hillary will never be indicted, ever! She has made it abundantly clear that if indicted she will spill the beans on everyone and take them all down with her. If indicted she is allowed “Discovery” by means of law. That will never be allowed to happen. Loretta Lynch has also told the FBI that even if they want to indict, that the The Department of Justice is in no way obligated to file. That pretty much says it all.

      Unless there is a President, no matter who that is, that takes the steps to order the military to arrest every one of these criminals (Congress) for treason, and hangs them all, nothing will change.

      The Banks and Corporations own the board, the pieces, and the rule sheet!

      • I pretty much agree. If Hillary becomes President, it will mean more of the same criminal foreign policy for the U.S. As a registered Democrat, I voted for Bernie Sanders as did most of Hawaii. If Hillary becomes the Democratic candidate for President, I will vote for Trump.

    • Do you nit pay attention? Four lawsuits have been thrown out this month alone. Pennsylvania judge declared him a Natural born citizen, which is accordance with the NBC act of 1790. Try reading it. Maybe you’ll learn something.

  8. She may be CFR, globalist, whatever, but couldn’t keep Lyin’ Ted happy, so he was copulating, fornicating all over the country.
    Like a GOP version of Bill Clinton.
    Some family values with this Canadian impostor.
    Makes Little Marco positively attractive.

    • Really? You believe a National Enquirer story? I guess you believe Tom Cruise was abducted by aliens then too. Trump is buddies with the CEO of National Enquirer. The only source listed for the story was Trumps main campaign man, Stone. Trump admits using the National Enquirer to attack Carson, and Carly. Common sense says Trump did this. As far as Heidi bring a Globalist; She was on the board of the CFR for three months where as she wrote ONE paragraph in a dissent about capitalism for the people with little government involvement. Hardly a globalist. Stop believing these crap articles and actually think for yourself

  9. I wonder if anyone has taken the impact of Reg “O” (12 CFR 215) into account. This regulation establishes stringent limits on loans to insiders and directors of banks. It is possible that the loan from Goldman Sachs violates that regulation. Loans to senior management and directors are limited to first mortgage loans and an aggregate limit.

    • You seem to think that somehow laws or regulations are followed. These people are immune from any prosecution from anything. You realize that right?

  10. Sadly, the majority of the voting public in the USA don’t read or research anything. They buy with full stock without question whatever the TV, Radio, and Papers tell them. They do not discuss or debate. The moment you mention anything that does not tow the line of propaganda, they immediately resort to name calling.

    The moment you mention CFR, they scream conspiracy theorist. The moment you mention the TPP, they say that’s a myth. And just try and explain that she works for Goldman Sachs and they just shake their head, and begin the name calling.

    You have to give it to the Globalists, for they have done their job very very well.
    They have made the majority of a nation that was once the greatest nation on earth, and turned them into babbling non thinking robot zombies who couldn’t form a thought on their own.

    Good job Globalists, you have my admiration.

  11. but but but …where’s Beck and the Mormons on these revelations and will they continue to bury the facts everyone now fully realizes of their foiled wolf pack candidates ?
    Trump 2016

  12. Wow. You people lack information. So Heidi Cruz is a globalist for being a part of the CFR for 3 months and wrote ONE PARAGRAPH DISSENTING from the globalist CFR stating that trade is handled better by private citizens than by governments. Yet you give a pass to trump that he named Richard Haas as one of his foreign policy advisors. Richard Haas is the PRESIDENT of the CFR and has been for the last 13 years.

    You people need to wake up. Oh and for the one birther comment, a judge in Pennsylvania has ruled that Cruz is a Natural Born Citizen. So now you get to try and work twice as hard to promote a false narrative that Cruz is ineligible. But if you would bother to learn the law, you would realize he is a Natural Born Citizen. Cruz is eligible for the presidency.

  13. Today Donald J. Trump announced Steven Mnuchin will serve as National Finance Chairman.
    Steven Mnuchin contributed to Hillary Clinton’s Senate Campaigns & 2008 Democratic Presidential Campaign.
    He Began His Career at Goldman Sachs Before Working for the George Soros-Funded OneWest Bank Group LLC.
    He joins the Trump team that also consists of Council on Foreign Relations President Richard Haass as his Foreign Policy Advisor. Hass is the spokesman for the NWO. He runs seminars all across the country promoting it. Trump is everything he campaigned against. He is a known Clinton supporter, connected to Goldman Sachs, George Soros, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the NWO. He is a proven liar and a fraud.

  14. Today Donald J. Trump announced Steven Mnuchin will serve as National Finance Chairman.
    Steven Mnuchin contributed to Hillary Clinton’s Senate Campaigns & 2008 Democratic Presidential Campaign.
    He Began His Career at Goldman Sachs Before Working for the George Soros-Funded OneWest Bank Group LLC.
    He joins the Trump team that also consists of Council on Foreign Relations President Richard Haass as his Foreign Policy Advisor. Hass is the spokesman for the NWO. He runs seminars all across the country promoting it. Trump is everything he campaigned against. He is a known Clinton supporter, connected to Goldman Sachs, George Soros, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the NWO. He is a proven liar and a fraud.

  15. Today Donald J. Trump announced Steven Mnuchin will serve as National Finance Chairman.
    Steven Mnuchin contributed to Hillary Clinton’s Senate Campaigns & 2008 Democratic Presidential Campaign.
    He Began His Career at Goldman Sachs Before Working for the George Soros-Funded OneWest Bank Group LLC.
    He joins the Trump team that also consists of Council on Foreign Relations President Richard Haass as his Foreign Policy Advisor. Hass is the spokesman for the NWO. He runs seminars all across the country promoting it. Trump is everything he campaigned against. He is a known Clinton supporter, connected to Goldman Sachs, George Soros, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the NWO. He is a proven liar and a fraud..

  16. Heidi is scary stuff pulling old teddy boys strings….how anyone could be duped by this couple….thank God he didn’t win!!!!!!! Phony!!!

Comments are closed.