Trump Supporters Mobbed, Spit On, Cornered, Assaulted In San Jose

June 3, 2016 Hunter Wallace Politics, SJWs 192

So this is going down tonight at the Trump rally in San Jose, California:

The dude getting knocked out by a mob carrying the Mexican flag – while the American flag is being burned in the background, and women are being spit on – really says it all. Hell, even pregnant women are being attacked and knocked to the ground!

I love this video of “Make California Mexico Again.” It really shows you where these people are coming from.

About Hunter Wallace 12392 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

186 Comments

  1. Sorry for these people. We’re with you!

    And, thank you for electing Donald Trump you awful cretins.

  2. The Mexicans usually are not Politically Involved so I believe personally the Jews aka Edomites and anarchist trash are the organizers behind all of this. Mexicans as a rule are not as wantonly aggressive as Negroes, so this shows some definate organizing by the usual suspects.

    • You are mistaken. The younger generation of Mexicans is hostile and belligerent. Mexican resentment at their failure in America combined with American sense of entitlement means an unpleasant future for America. The Jews are ultimately responsible for the horror because of the 1965 immigration policy but the video is a frightening glimpse of what is in store for America.

      • I agree, there is a late 20s Mexican at work who grew up in Chicago, on the white end of the mestizo spectrum who seems fairly bright and is a private pilot. He is also a radical leftist who has a fetish for denouncing “Columbus.” Strange as someone with more Spanish ancestry than native he wants to redo history and prevent his own existence? Must have got this indoctrination in the Chicago public schools.

        • As I said above under NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES Mexicans typically are not the violent blood drinking savages like the Negro. Factoring in the collapse of Catholicism, the collapse of the family, and heavy EDOMITE ie Jew indoctrination, and you get what you see above. The problem is that we live in a cesspool of corruption and the cesspool allows the most vile to rise to the top.

          I will say that if families were still what they were in 1940, the above would never happen. However we live in a world of absent fathers and Hip Hop music and now we have what you see in San Jose.

      • They are also responsible for the decay of our educational system by way of The Frankfurt School.

      • I have no doubt that there has been a radicalization pushed by the usual suspects ie Jews. As for the 1965 Immigration Act, that only dealt with the EASTERN HEMISPHERE. The Western Hemisphere was always exempt from our immigration laws, in fact Mexicans could cross the border at will. It was easier for a Mexican to immigrate to the USA than it was for a Englishman to do the same. This was because greedy farmers in Texas needed Mexican laborers. In fact when the 1924 immigration act was passed, a rider was put on it to cover the Western Hemisphere but farmers in Texas, who depended on Mexican and Florida who used West Indians to harvest Cane, defeated it.

    • Trump has upended the GOP strategy of pandering to Hispanics and attacking negroes.

      These protests are probably RNC funded at this point.

      • I wouldn’t doubt it at this point. As I said before most Mexicans don’t seem to be political you give them a sack of pinto beans, some pork and some corn flour for tortillas and some beer and the Mexican will eat and be satisfied for a lifetime. Anyone who has been around them knows typically the Mexican takes some prodding to get him to rise up and he can do it nastily when he does, but normally its not his nature.

        Now the Age of Hip Hop has likely changed this as has the fact that 60% of all Mexicans are now illegitimate

  3. Nope, no hate here.

    I appreciate OD being on this quickly, as I’ve said: starts as an election, ends as a war.

    When the brown tide starts getting pushed back into Mexico, it will trigger their violent backlash. That’s when we can take total control.

  5. With video footage like this going viral online, more and more white Americans are getting redpilled on race every day. A historical shift in public opinion and politics is happening before our eyes.
    But will we Southern Nationalists get any closer to independence from it?

      • You don’t at this point. The slow racial awakening and drift toward Nationalism doesn’t need to be fractured or siphoned off into impotent regional movements that have very little to gain at this stage of the game. Getting people to embrace Nationalism has been a tough mountain to climb; but we’ve almost reached the top and we have tens of millions of people in the USA alone that are on board. Getting most people to comprehend the logic that dictates that Nationalism without Racialism is destined for failure, however, is a Mt. Everest type of climb that we are still climbing and clawing our way to the top.

        Southern, Northern, MidWestern, West Coast, East Coast, SouthWest, Pacific NorthWest…………. These labels mean very little to non-White people whose sole focus is to displace and destroy White people. Securing a regional identity will only come when you are able to work very, very closely with other Racial Nationalists across the nation who share your goal of living under a Racial Nationalist type of government.

        You’re riding on a wave created by a billionaire from New York. I would think that alone would give you a good clue as to why a Southern Nationalist proposition is something that isn’t going to gain any real traction at the moment.

        • Trump has nicely galvanized the white southern vote and the northern prole vote. It’s a minor miracle.

          • Precisely why I think it would be a horrible strategy to purposely draw lines of division between various groups of White people who are simultaneously showing signs of racial awakening and throwing off the chains of political correctness and flushing decades worth of indoctrination out of their systems. Even a glimmer of resistance and racial awakening at this point is a good sign and something that should be used to unite White people, not divide them. White people in Illinois, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New York, etc. don’t need to hear how evil Yankees are destroying the superior cultures of Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, and the rest of The South. It’s counterproductive to fight on several fronts when you can’t even put up a decent defense on one front.

            Obviously many, many White people in the North are thinking exactly like White people in the South when it comes to specific issues and which candidate best represents a dagger through the heart of the Political Class and the status quo.

          • The rate of awakening and red-pilling is going to vary from region to region. To insist on political cohesion is comparable to insisting all survivors of a ship wreak get into the same life boat even though some passengers insist on putting a hole in the bottom. Would you expect Poland or Hungary to accept endless invaders because Sweden, Germany, and France are accepting them?

          • It doesn’t matter, anyway, Mr. Crews, because you so-called Southern Nationalists have neither a strategy nor resources. All you have is your enduring, free-floating hostility toward things non-Southern, especially “the Union,” “the North,” or “Yankees.” If the word “college” were associated, in the Southern mind, with, say, “mathematics,” as opposed to “black football players,” then maybe you’d have built a Silicon Valley or something else that would have given you economic and thus political might. A century-and-a-half of passive aggression, of grousing, is, to put it mildly, second-rate politics.

          • Again, I see it as horrible strategy to draw lines of division among racialists when the only thing that binds non-Whites is the destruction of White people.

            Your analogy is ridiculous. Poland and Hungary accepting endless invaders isn’t germane to an argument about Polish Nationalists, Hungarian Nationalists, Swedish, German and French Nationalists all working together in some productive capacity instead of pointing fingers and blaming each other for the other’s demise. That’s the premise of Southern Nationalism at this point, and why it’s been stagnant and almost completely ineffective at growing a viable alternative to the status quo.

            What you seem to be suggesting is fracturing of something that is already somewhat fractured to begin with. It does nothing but weaken you and your position to do that.

          • Our having our own republic or working towards one does mean that we cannot work together in some productive capacity to resist the brown invasion.

            Blacks, muzzies and Hispanics all have their own movements and loyalties. They do not belong to a single PoC club or id as a generic PoC identity. They may join together to elect Hillary, but I can assure you that La Raza is not working to bring in more Cubans, and I can assure you that BLM is not working for any reconquista of the Southwest.

          • WOW – I knew there were hate-filled people out there but after reading just a portion of this comment string blows my mind. Why must you have a target to spew your vitriolic rants? Take some personal responsibility for your lot in life and quit blaming one group after another for your own inadequacies. The only up-side is that all of you must have a constant stomach ache from maintaining such negative emotions. Do you enjoy your lives at all? Sad.

        • Such a strategy is effectively placing all our eggs into one basket. Either all the West is saved or none of it is saved. Considering what is at stake I think it is a foolish strategy especially in the near term. A white ethno-state comprised of just one large state or a number of contiguous states provides a base of support in both manpower and finances. It also shows whites in other regions what a white ethno-state could accomplish and would do much to encourage other break away white ethno-states.

          • A decentralized cooperative if you will. As I said before with the Scotland secession, I believed it would have been good for England, as it has been since 1707 the Englishmen and women who have been forced to sacrifice for the Union and call themselves British. Think about this, now Wales and Scotland are allowed Parliaments but the UK Parliament in London represents everyone. Who represents the English people?

            The Founding Fathers, looking at the United Kingdom’s British policy and Pennsylvania’s diversity decided to create this idea of an AMERICAN. Now an American was supposedly an amalgamation of all nationalities and cultures who was equally at home in Maine as in Georgia. New England wanted it both ways, they wanted to keep their distinctiveness while pushing Americanization on everyone. The South saw this and saw it for what it was, replacing diverse cultures with a cultureless rootless overculture. They got out.

            I could go into more detail but its tedious

        • We would not be siphoning off racial awakening from whites in general. In fact it might even be a boost.

          I was thinking along the gungrabber/libtard strategy of “never let a crisis go to waste”. We are silly not to try to use current events to our advantage.

    • But are there just too many idiot communist whites to really win this sad situation at the ballot box? The fact that a piece of shit like Obama could win twice has me skeptical. What good this can do is radicalize the significant minority who are still opposed to these internationalist, globalist, communist changes. This lets people know how bad it is and the “civics class” crap you were taught a couple of generations back in 5th grade is no longer applicable. The fact that Cruz’s constitution fetishism didn’t really take off and people chose Trump, the firebrand fighter suggests this is already underway. The constitution may have worked for a while, but it got us into this mess and clearly isn’t the correct recipe as it currently stands for a viable country without dramatic changes to prevent leftist subversion by hostile organized elements playing by different rules.

        • John C. Calhoun was an admirer of Thomas Jefferson knew him personally but by 1846 had repudiated him and saw him for what he really was, a fool of the worst order. Jefferson supported the Race-Mixing Atheist Revolutionary French Government which had Negroes sitting in the Revolutionary Convention and murdered hundreds of Roman Catholic Clergy and laity. Madison also supported the French Revolution.

          Jefferson also supported subsidizing interracial marriage between Whites and Indians which would in his view end the Indian issue once and for all. Thus to end the Indian wars to Jefferson we had to in a sense create a new American Race a Mestizo one if you will. Patrick Henry’s 1784 bill offered to provide free education and tax relief to any white man who would marry an Indian squaw.

          • The most false and dangerous of all political errors. The proposition to which I allude, has become an axiom in the minds of a vast majority on both sides of the Atlantic, and is repeated daily from tongue to tongue, as an established and incontrovertible truth; it is, that “all men are born free and equal.”

            Taking the proposition literally (it is in that sense it is understood), there is not a word of truth in it. It begins with “all men are born,” which is utterly untrue. Men are not born. Infants are born. They grow to be men. And concludes with asserting that they are born “free and equal,” which is not less false. They are not born free. While infants they are incapable of freedom, being destitute alike of the capacity of thinking and acting, without which there can be no freedom. Besides, they are necessarily born subject to their parents, and remain so among all people, savage and civilized

            If we trace it back, we shall find the proposition differently expressed in the Declaration of Independence. That asserts that “all men are created equal.” The form of expression, though less dangerous, is not less erroneous. All men are not created. According to the Bible, only two, a man and a woman, ever were, and of these one was pronounced subordinate to the other. All others have come into the world by being born, and in no sense, as I have shown, either free or equal.

            SENATOR JOHN CALDWELL CALHOUN OF SOUTH CAROLINA JUNE 27 1848.

        • That was my impression of Marc Levine’s show during the 2000s when it would come on the same channel Limbaugh was on during the day. One radio insider says the reason that show suddenly was everywhere was it came bundled with Hannity, an if they wanted to run Hannity after Limbaugh they had to run Levine’s “constitution fetishism” show as part of the deal. That’s why that boring show suddenly showed up in place of the much more interesting Savage Nation. Cruz’ candidacy was the ultimate culmination of the Levine show’s wet dream of “constitution fetishism” rhetoric.

  6. The photo of the invader carrying the “Trump, This is Mexico! You are not welcome on native/Mexican soil.” sign in San Jose, California should be all over the Internet. Without Trump this will eventually become reality. Disgusting.

    • California, Arizona, New Mexico and parts of Texas always were Mexico at some level because even after we took them, we never realized that we would have to keep them out to keep the land. Mexico has never at any time since 1848 been restricted under any immigration law. EVER. Nevada and Utah were also Mexican land but they were largely empty as was Mexican Colorado.

      South Texas and most of the Rio Grande Valley had multiple Mexican uprisings after 1848, the worst of which happened during the Cortina Wars before and after the War of Northern Aggression and another happened in 1915 because of the Mexican Revolution. The problem is greedy Texas farmers and ranchers put their financial interests ahead of Texas sovereignty and ultimately all of our sovereignty and forced Washington DC to accept open Mexican Immigration. At every point Wealthy Texans and later Wealthy farmers in California and Arizona forced the point on Open Borders with Mexico. Now the chickens have come home to roost.

      What sickens me so much is how Southern Men and ESPECIALLY Texans who knew their history, said Remember the Alamo were willing for a few measly bucks to sell Texas back to the enemy that Texas had to fight two bloody wars against. California I understand as Yanks are seldom logical, Texas I don’t

      • “Seldom logical”? It was a great state before we started letting in all the transplants from the rest of the country. It still remains an awesome place.

        • I meant Yankees as a whole are seldom logical, Northern California, Oregon and Washington State are extensions of the Northeastern States. How and why California went so heavily leftist after 1960 is a study within itself as it is very confusing, but most of the trouble seems to have started with the large influx of New York Jews to take advantage of Free College after WW2 and Hollywood.

      • Lenin had these Texans in mind when he said:

        ” the capitalists will,sell,us anything including the rope we hang them with”

        • I wouldn’t want to be accusing of bashing Texas, that’s not where I am coming from the Texans are the Spartans of Dixie. I trace some of the problem to the fact that after the War of Southern Independence Texas was only about 1/8 to 1/4 settled depending on the actual numbers not sure which, most of the state was empty. Because of this, the aggregious evil of Radical Republican Reconstruction that befell Alabama, South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, only touched East Texas. The rest of the state, where the Federal Army was more concerned with Indian attacks than Negro rights, they seemed to develop a working relationship with the locals and were seen as a necessary evil.

          All a Texan who got in trouble with the Reconstruction authorities ala John Wesley Hardin had to do was disappear into the frontier where he was likely never to be found, the more settled states of the South didn’t have this luxury to the extent Texas did. In fact Southerners from the Chesapeake to the Missouri River Valley went to the Texas frontier to flee Reconstruction in Gone with the Wind, the evil Yankee overseer of Tara, who returned to Georgia a Radical Republican Jonas Wilkerson,is killed by Tony Fontaine who flees to Texas to escape the Reconstruction authorities.

          For a myraid of reasons, Texas developed an emphasis on growth less similar to Dixie and more similar to the North. First Big Cattle, then Big Oil, then Big Vegetable Farms, you name it it seemed there to always be about growth. Just like the North, this unfettered growth necessitated the Mexican Peasant labor force and the Negroes as well. It never occurs to the Rio Grande Valley vegetable farmer or the JR Ewings that their duty to their people is above that to their business. They never saw that their very behaviors placed their homeland within the conquerors grasp because all they were concerned about is money.

          Obviously today this attitude infects the entire South, it always ran like wildfire in the North albeit Texas seems to have growth fever the worst, followed by Florida. Now we live with the results.

  7. I’m reading that the cops just stood and watched as Trump people were assaulted. 911 calls went unanswered.

  8. The way I see it, white (or black) people in California who vote against Trump are voting to be (or to have their descendents be) future subjects of Mexico City.

    • The Reconquista Crowd will then split and fight amongst themselves. The Aztlan People want a new Hispanic nation in SW USA, the Reconquista wants reunion with Mexico which itself is run by an oppressive Spanish Elite who will kill anyone who opposes them. The irony is these Reconquista people support the very country where gangs of bandits rape and kill your family members and the judges laugh because you don’t have any money to pay them to do anything about it. Irony

  9. SJW’s are providing pro-Trump advertising every time they go on these screaming and thuggery rampages. Their string pullers are idiots too for thinking this will weaken the object of their hatred.

    Never interfere with your enemy whenever he’s doing things to hurt himself.

  10. The best advertising for the FALLACY of ‘Multiculturalism’ and Obama’s failed reign, you could imagine.

    EVERY SINGLE WHITE IS STARTING TO THINK: “They all have to go.”

    And we have won.

  11. Democrats are seething right now because all that BULL they push in the media about them being the more educated & virtuous ones are now publically being proven WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!!!!

  12. These liberal white people empathetically opened their borders and now they’re being terrorized. Can you say “DUH”?

  13. What do these rabid maniacs call us? Invaders? Well unless these mutants are full-blooded indian, they are invaders, too!

    This is the face of communism. How many of our sons and daughters were killed fighting communism and these morons openly embrace it? The ironic part is the jackboot will be stomped down harder on their necks than those of others.

    Adversity breeds men, prosperity breeds monsters – Victor Hugo – ain’t it the truth!

  14. PC shi*heads yammer about Hate Speech, but it’s time to talk about Repressive Speech, Tyrannical Speech, Control Speech, Nanny Speech, and Totalitarian Speech.

    Hating Free Speech is not free speech.

    PC is doublespeech, a form of doublespeak.

    Time to end the Tyranny-Nanny or Nanny-Tyranny… or Tyra-Nanny.

    Do you want to live in a world dominated by the ideas and attitudes of Big Sister Trigglypuff?

    ————————–

    Now you know how Palestinians feel. The media treat white people like Palestinians.
    Jews destroyed Palestine and Palestinians, but Palestinians are accused of violence for resisting Zionist oppression.
    In the US, the anti-white mobs attack whites, but the Jew-run media say whites are evil.

    Jewish War on Whites or J-WOW must end.

  15. One frustration is seeing a barrage of claims made by the Jew media which are not refuted by American nationalists. A recent article in the New York Times is “Trump Could Threaten US Rule of Law, Scholars Say”. The very newspaper which defends lawlessness by illegal aliens and praises Obama’s illegal and unconstitutional executive orders has just discovered the rule of law is under threat.

  16. Folks…

    Two faces of Niceness.

    There is Niceness to win approval from others. It is the Niceness of subservience.

    There is the Niceness to gain control over others. It is the Niceness of power.

    Young Vito Corleone in THE GODFATHER PART II uses Niceness as a weapon.

    Jews and Homos use Niceness as a weapon. They act Nice to you with the veiled threat that they will not approve of you unless you agree with them. If they selling Niceness, you better buy it on their terms. They are not acting Nice to give you something and to serve you. They are acting Nice to sell you something, to manipulate you. There is always the sense that things will be unpleasant, subtly or seriously, if you don’t accept the terms of their Niceness.

    A lot of Northern European types are Nice in the sense of wanting approval. This is why there were vulnerable to both the Nazis and the Jewzis.

    They earnestly sought the approval of the Fuhrer or the Jewrer.

    In contrast, Hitler’s Niceness was a veiled threat. Hitler didn’t rant all the time. Sometimes, he could be Nice and Diplomatic. But he wasn’t begging for approval. He was just using Niceness and charm to gain an advantage and total control.

    Jews are the same way. People like William Kristol may smile a lot and act Nice, but they are always looking to gain control.

    In contrast, Dan Quayle’s Niceness was all about seeking approval of people smarter than him(which was just about everyone).

    Homos often act Nice. They try to win you over by playing on heartstrings and acting like poor poor victims in need of help. But they really want to gain control you. They want to make you swallow the BS that fecal penetration among homos is something to celebrate and associate with the rainbow. And Homos have the backing of all-powerful Jews. Obama knows the politics of Niceness. He was playing for power, but all the Nice White Liberals who voted for him were begging for approval.

    We need to better understand the Politics of Niceness.

    Don’t act Nice in seek of approval from those who use Niceness as a weapon of control and gaining advantage.

    If a snakeoil salesman acts nice to you, beware!!! It’s the niceness of the Serpent in the Eden story.

    Watch David Mamet movies on the Art of the Nice.

    HOUSE OF GAMES. SPANISH PRISONER.

  17. Trump’s message to Latinos should be this: Are you AMERICAN FIRST or TRIBAL MEXICANS FIRST? Do you support RULE OF LAW that applies to ALL Americans equally or do you favor illegal behavior just for Tribal reasons because bulk of illegals happen to be Latino?

    Trump is accused of tribalism and ‘racism’, but by posing that question, he will put Latinos on the moral defensive. After all, Latinos are supporting Illegal immigration ONLY BECAUSE the majority of illegals are Mexican. If most illegals were Hindu or Chinese or African, would Mexican-Americans support it?

    After all, if all Americans are supposed to be for the common good regardless of race, then why should Latinos not be part of Rule of Law? It is Rule of Law that binds Americans together because Justice is supposed to be blind.

    If laws must be twisted and bent to serve tribal or particular interests, then RULE OF LAW is gone, and the future of Americanism will be tribal. And that means the rise of white nationalism since the rising tide of non-whites will play by their own rules.

    Jews have twisted rule of law to favor Jewish interests and Israel.

    Blacks have twisted rule of law to favor black power.

    Latinos have twisted rule of law to favor more brown power.

    Homos have twisted rule of law to enact stuff like ‘gay marriage’.

    ——————————–

    • Actually Nonwhites have no political power in the USA everything of which you see is just another facet of Jewish Control ie EDOM. Without Jewish Funding, Jewish Laws, Jewish lawyers, Jewish judges Jewish politicians, and a Jewish media the entire thing collapses. Look at Detroit. The Jews removed their funding and now the city has a WHITE MAYOR. Why? Because without the heavy Jewish involvement, the Negro is incapable of holding onto anything and the White man is soon back in power. The Jews in Michigan seeing Detroit as a negative after Kwame Kilpatrick wrote the city off.

      Homosexuals also fall under the Jewish umbrella.

      Latinos is a different kettle of fish because they are also funded by the Jewish borg in part, but as they have actual foreign governments supporting them it adds another level to the entire deal. Muslims are the same thing, they actively have foreign governments supporting them.

  18. Folks…

    Paradoxically, the anti-Trump rage among Mexican-Americans and Illegals is NOT ‘leftism’ but has more in common with the Alt Right.

    It is Alt-Mexican in the sense that those Mexers are saying, THE HELL WITH YOUR CONSTITUTION AND ABSTRACT RULE OF LAW; WE ARE FOR BROWN POWER, MEXICAN PRIDE, AND THE MEXICAN FLAG(WHILE WE PISS ON YOUR GRINGO FLAG).

    And BLACK LIVES MATTER, though seen as part of the ‘left’, is really an Alt-Black movement that is primarily focused on black power and black identity and interests.

    Since blacks are savage, their power and expression are manifested in savagery and childish lunacy.

    Since Mexers are mediocre, their power and expression are manifested in loutish behavior of Gomezian magnitude.

    At any rate, even as White Libs try to harness this black rage and brown rage as part of the ‘left’ against the White Right, what we are seeing is the breaking apart of the Left Coalition.

    Look at Trannies. They only care about their own ‘identity’ and vanity. They wanna cross into women’s rooms like illegal Mexicans wanna cross over into the US. And even legal Mexican-Americans approve of illegal invasion because it means more Brown Power.

    And of course, Jews are all for Jewish power, which is why all politicians are pressured to grovel to AIPAC.

    The label goes by the name of ‘leftist’, but it’s really made up of a bunch of alt-identitarians be they Jewish, homo, brown, black, Muslim, etc.

  19. Actually I would join the Mexicans in burning the American Rag, it doesn’t represent me that flag IS THE FLAG OF OPPRESSION. It has been the flag of oppression as far as I am concerned since November 6th, 1860. In fact i will donate those Mexicans a bottle of Ronsonol to do the job. This is the hilariousness of the whole thing, although I oppose their reasons, I do support burning the rag.

    The question is when will Southern Nationalists finally abandon the attachment to the rag and begin burning them? They did burn American Rags in 1859 60 and 61 look it up.

    • When they burn the flag they are not cognizant of historical conflicts in this country.

      To them the flag symbolises Gringos as a whole.

      • That’s true. I just find it hilarious in a way that when people whined about the burning of the American Flag I couldn’t help but cheer it on, because they are in effect burning the very flag of Multiculturalism and Faggotry that protects them. Kinda like cutting off your own arm

  21. It should now be clearing up– the #1 national security threat to the US is illegal “immigration.”

  24. I would like to thank my retarded enemies the inferior sewer rats for making my Victory inevitable. There are a lot of mistakes you can afford to make, and some you can take back, but this is one of those Historic Mistakes that change the Whole Course of History.
    Those brown scum attacking White voters while burning American flags and waving Mexican flags. I’m actually overcome. Its Christmas in June.
    So this is the start of Civil War II. This is sweet. They must all go now, and the niggers too. BLM and La Raza. Two scum with one stoner Marxist Jew fooligan.
    Get some food and ammo. We’re about to have The World’s Largest Turkey Shoot. The American Army is all worn out, and the cops are too afraid to show.
    Sometimes it just turns out even better than you expected. Is it Luck or Karma? Its better, ITS VICTORY!

  27. People..

    White Proglobalists or Progressive-Globalists are imperialist. By denying white nations the right to remain white, they deny right of non-white nations to remain non-white.

    Denying that Hungary has the right to remain Hungarian is like denying the right of Palestine to remain Palestinian. Oops, it looks like Jews already destroyed Palestine and are working on destroying Hungary as well.

    Jews destroyed Palestine with Jewish migration, and Jews seek to destroy Hungary with Muslim/African immigration.

  28. Oh, c’mon, y’all. These are just Natural Conservatives demonstrating their “acts of love.”

    Go to hell, Red State, NR, ¡Jeb!, #NeverTrump– all of you. I see no reason to prefer you to the leftist rabble.

  29. Worse than abortion is ‘Afrortion’ whereby a white woman uses her womb to have a black baby. She is essentially killing and murdering the white-child-that-could-have-been by banning white men from her white womb, which is to be reserved as a nursery-hatchery for black babies who will grow up to be biological enemies of the white race. There is no worse enemy than a white bitch who chooses Afrortion. Her betrayal isn’t merely ideological or cultural but biological and of the blood. Is it any wonder why Jews promote interracism? A white woman who ideologically betrays her own people can return to the fold with a change of heart & mind. But when her very body rejects white men and serves as a life-giver to mulatto-black children, her betrayal has taken place at the bio-molecular level. It is why THE SEARCHERS is such an important movie. The Politics of the Womb is most important, indeed even more than Politics of the Soil. A people can lose the land but still maintain identity, culture, and heritage by having the men and women form families to have more of their own kind. Thus, Jews survived without a nation for thousands of years. But when the men lose connection to the wombs of their women, they are finished as a race and culture.

    Whenever a white woman has a black kid, a white kid has been Afrorted from her womb.

    • back around 2005, before I ascended to race-realism, I wonder’d why the (((eskimos))) @ Yahoo always had Heidi Klum “trending”. Then I found out: white womb f**king for ‘groids & producing niglets. There’s nothing the (((eskimos))) like better than a white womb producing niglets

    • “The Politics of the Womb is most important, indeed even more than Politics of the Soil.”

      Lapidary, as is so much of what you say.

    • It’s called tainted telegony. Once the womb is tainted by a non-white baby, the damage is irreversible. Charles Weissman has spoken extensively on this issue.

      • People, you’re over intellectualizing something and inventing big words for a simple issue. Any white girl dragging around a half black bastard is instantly repellent at a gut level to all white people. It’s just foul.

        • I never even saw such a thing growing up and I lived in Ohio. Sure we heard rumors, but if you stayed out of the slums your contact with Mudsharks was almost ZERO, in fact few actually would go out in public. Now there were a few cities where the behavior was said to happen but where I lived it was all but unheard of. This changed after about 1993 when suddenly they would go out in the daylight hours, they didnt as a rule go out in the daylight hours when I was a youth. So as I said you never saw it.

          • There was a family in our town in the 70s, mother and daughter both brilliant but strange, what we’d now diagnose as Aspergers. The daughter became a hippie in the early 70s hitchhiked to California, came back and had one black boyfriend after another. Results was a half black Bastard child, this women never married, became fat, and lived in ratty apartments with her daughter and cats. Strange thing that definitely peaked my interest as a child was the half black daughter was in L.D. back in the 80s when they still had “tracking” in school with the smart, average, and dumb kids split up into separate groups. I wondered how such a high IQ woman could give birth to a total dummy unless the line on race isn’t true and those black genes are overpoweringly stupid. And at the time I really wanted to believe blacks really were equal to whites and soon they’d all be just like the middle class family mirages we see in the TV commercials and the ghettos, crime, and disfunction would go away.

          • A Mulatto is usually more intelligent than the African Parent but less intelligent than the White Parent. Thus a white woman with a 105 IQ who breeds with a 72 IQ Negro probably produces a child that has an IQ in the low range of 80 to the high range of 90 if that.

            Of course IQ is not the only marker of intelligence the Negro is stunted intelligence wise in that he has an inborn lack of SELF CONTROL and RESTRAINT. The two things it takes to learn are these, you must control your urges to want to goof off and you must show restraint in your behavior. This was noted by a million slavemasters from the 1700s till 1865 that the Negro left to his own devices is worse than an animal even a gorilla lives by a code, the Negro lives by nothing. He has to have his neck bent to make him behave by a forceful hand

          • The crack of the whip constantly over their heads is the only way to keep the nigger in line.

          • For the record, Billy Ray, I’ll post the following, which is from a comment I posted at Counter-Currents, back in 2013:

            “Here in northeast Philadelphia, there was a sharp increase in black-white couples–white woman, black man–almost immediately after the release of the Spike Lee film ‘Jungle Fever’ (1991). I’m going by the couples I saw walking along
            sidewalks.”

          • The entire point of the South’s Anti Miscgenation Laws was that Dixie had lots of White Trash, leftovers from the days when Virginia to Georgia was a dumping ground for Great Britains refuse and political prisoners. While folks of good breeding could be expected not to behave in this way as a matter of common sense, the White Trash had to be compelled.

            The North had a much smaller White Trash population component its main concern was Catholic Immigrants and as Protestant whites in the North scarcely regarded Catholics as White, they felt that if a Irish Catholic mated with a nigger as they considered the Irish niggers anyway, it wasn’t a big deal. The nigger scarcely encountered the better sort of whites if ever. Thus Miscgenation was legal in the North as it was seen as something that would only be a problem among the Irish Catholic gutter trash in the slums. Unbeknownst to the White Protestants, the Irish developed a racial awareness superior to theirs. Example Southie in Boston.

            I am not sure about every area in the USA, but I know where I am most familiar with this problem only began to rear its head in Public around 1992-93. Before that yes it would be rumored that so and so was seen with a nig but there was seldom any way to substantiate those rumors as this behavior went on solely at night and never in public outside the foulest slums. Like I said before then you had to scour the slums to find it and usually only after the Sun went down. In the Daytime it was strictly Verboten

          • Hmm–1992-93. That basically matches what happened around here: the period shortly after “Jungle Fever,” which was released in June 1991. Frankly, I never took seriously Spike Lee’s race-mixing opposition as expressed via that movie (of which I’ve seen only one or two clips). He seemed to me to be celebrating the practice, visually, while he was ostensibly opposing it, verbally. Accordingly, I’m not surprised his attitude seems to have softened, as you report.

            My 2013 Counter-Currents comment, which I excerpted above, also included the following:

            “Within the last ten years or so, I began seeing, too, around here, white men with black women. Couples like that are still rare, but I saw a nice-looking white man with a black woman who was nothing special in a pizza shop late on a Friday night just a few weeks or so ago. This was a young couple, i.e., a couple that looked to be out on a date.”

          • I agree being a nigger became fashionable in the early 90’s. Two main reasons: obviously the media, and more importantly, Bill Clinton’s pandering to niggers. Before Clinton presidents just ignored niggers where as during his campaign he was playing the saxophone on the Arsenio Hall show.

          • Interesting that you mention the Arsenio Hall show, Ronnie. At the 2013 Counter-Currents thread of which my above-excerpted comment was a part, another commenter wrote as follows:

            “I clearly remember, around 1989, that tv advertisements in the US suddenly featured a lot of blacks and other non-whites. I remember thinking, What happened to all the white men on tv? This change seemingly happened overnight. Does anyone else remember this? What might have caused so sudden a shift?”

            My own comment was in response to that and began as follows:

            “1989 was the year Arsenio Hall’s late-night talk show began. I do remember someone’s remarking, around the time that that show was new, that blacks seemed to be everywhere on television.”

            It’s funny, now that I think about it, how the process played out. When Bill Cosby co-starred on “I Spy,” which had its debut in 1965, it was conspicuous: first black with a major role on a network TV show. A few years later, when Diahann Carroll starred in “Julia,” which began in 1968, it was another much-reported first: black woman with the lead in a network TV show. Arsenio’s hosting that talk show still seemed startling, even though two decades had passed.

          • I remember those days. I was in high school during the transformation. It could be seen in how my schoolmates began to dress and even talk. A complete transformation in many of them from how they were beforehand.

            We had the advent of the “wigger”, White kids who suddenly began acting as if they were niggers from intercity ghettos. Some were so brainwashed by the fashionable blacks being paraded in the media it was truly insanity.

            The push of the nigger was in full force up until 2000. It began to ease at that point and a more militant anti-White narrative took hold in the media. I’d say 1998 was peak negro.

          • I remember in the late 80s the uniform of the blue collar white boys was a mullet, blue jeans, and a black concert T-shirt of some heavy metal band. They were ubiquitous, standing on the corner smoking cigarettes. I came back by my old High School in 1994 and that archetype was gone, instead the boys on the corner were all dressed like Vanilla Ice, the Wigger thing was in full bloom.

          • That sounds about right, Nightowl. Around 1989, I guess, I joked to someone that the crowd of youngsters outside the neighborhood public high school, here in northeast Philadelphia, at the end of each school day, was a mass of Metallica T-shirts. Now that I think about it, I’m not sure I ever saw one of those students with such a shirt on, but that, at least, is what I thought of them as wearing. It must have been a few years later, now that you’ve mentioned it, that I first heard the term “wigger,” when a friend of mine told me a nephew of his was one (as had been said by the boy’s mother, my friend’s sister). It’s amazing that the change, as witnessed by you, when you went back to your high school, was stark.

          • I graduated in 1994 and while among our group I didn’t see as much Wigger activity went to a school in a small town there was some it was much more evident in the kids two years or more younger than I was. In fact I always say I was in the last year of people who graduated school without the internet. The difference between the kids just a couple of years younger and us culturally were night and day.

          • “Some were so brainwashed by the fashionable blacks being paraded in the media it was truly insanity.”

            That sounds right.

          • 1988 was the year of the first Rap Music explosion when you had a lot of crossover Rap Music onto the music charts. This was the era of Pop Rap and this era ended in 1992 which was basically Rap Music for the masses. The acts were stuff like Tone Loc, Young Mc LL Cool J, Run DMC, Vanilla Ice Fresh Prince and Mc Hammer. This music was the stuff listened to basically by whites and mainstream Negroes. Few white kids or anyone from the suburbs for that matter in 1988 listened to hardcore Rap ie 2 Live Crew Ice T NWA and the ones who did usually listened to it to laugh at it, not adopt the lifestyle

            1988 was also about the time that Michael Jordan exploded onto the scene as a phenomenon and completely transcended basketball.

            While all of this was going on, these Negro trends largely affected the White kids under the age of 12 in 1988. Many white kids who were 12 and up then listened to a lot of Heavy Metal and made fun of kids who listened to nigger music. This was the era of Guns N Roses, Poison Motley Crue, Metallica and others.

            1992 marked the end of the Pop-Rap Era and the Heavy Metal Era. The Rodney King Riots, which broke out in April of 1992 brought Gangsta Rap into the Mainstream. At the same time the Seattle Grunge Death Cult was being pushed on the White kids who were mostly between the ages of 14-20 in 1992.

          • In 1992 suddenly all the Pop Rap Acts found themselves irrelevent as did Bill Cosby, who went off the air that year. The new generation of Negroes who were the kids under 14 in 1992 were the first who had been literally raised since birth on Rap Music. These kids saw Bill Cosby as lame, Will Smith as lame, Mc Hammer as lame. Their idols were the thugs. Death Row Records came onto the scene in 1992 and soon Dr Dre Snoop Doggy Dogg were known in every house in America.

            Michael Jordan, Rap Music Arsenio etc, would have all been for naught without Bill Clinton, he was the last piece of the puzzle. The Clintons sent a tone of Negro worship which was much different than that of Reagan and Bush. Bill Clinton created the Obama reality we know today.

            A little walk down memory lane

          • Excellent overview as usual, Billy Ray. Both you and our fellow commenter Ronnie will probably be surprised that I was never struck by the role of Bill Clinton in all of this. It’s interesting because part of his campaign strategy, during his first presidential run, was his marginalizing of Jesse Jackson via the Sister Souljah thing. I guess he’d decided that Jackson, on the race front, and Pat Schroeder, on the feminist front, were unmanageable problems for the Democrats, so he moved both of them off the national stage. (I don’t know how he got rid of Schroeder, but she seemed to fade pretty quickly once he was in office. She went quietly, as Jackson did not.)

            When I’d read your overview, I checked the dates of a few items that had stuck in my mind over the years. Since the Beastie Boys’ “Fight for Your Right” and the Run-D.M.C. version of “Walk This Way” seemed to me to herald the first big rap era, I checked their release dates, which, sure enough, were spring and summer of 1986, two years before “the first Rap Music explosion,” as you termed it.

            After that, I checked Tone Loc and MC Hammer. The former was right there at the beginning of “Rap Music for the masses,” as you called it; the latter was not far behind …

            “Wild Thing,” Tone Loc — released November 1988
            “Funky Cold Medina,” Tone Loc — released March 1989

            “U Can’t Touch This,” MC Hammer — released January 1990 (month after the debut of “The Simpsons,” incidentally)

            After that, I checked “Cop Killer,” which I think of as the breakthrough record for what came to be called gangsta rap (even if it’s probably classed as some kind of heavy metal). Sure enough, that record, with Ice-T on the vocal, was released in 1992, exactly where you placed gangsta rap’s entry into the mainstream. (Not sure what month that single was released, but “Body Count,” the album on which it appeared, was released March 1992, the month before the start of the Rodney King riots.)

            One thing that also came into my mind was the movie “New Jack City,” which turns out to have been released in early 1991 and thus to have heralded, in my mind, at least, the mainstreaming of gangsta rap. I remember being in a pizza shop in which the young guy and girl behind the counter were listening to what I somehow determined was music from that movie. Maybe I asked them what it was that they were listening to, there on the shop’s radio. Startled, as I was, when they told me it was from “New Jack City,” I asked them whether white kids listened to rock any longer. “No,” they said.

            I remember seeing an interview in which Elton John said, with evident boredom, that all the music he was hearing from the U.S. was “heavy metal and rap.” That must have been during the 1988-92 era that you identified.

            On the white side, as you say, things got shaken up with grunge at just about the same time that gangsta rap was coming in on the black side. I remember seeing, on television, a female Asian-American figure skater who was listening to Nirvana on her Walkman “backstage” during the 1992 Winter Olympics (February). It must have been Kristi Yamaguchi. The “Nevermind” album and the single “Smells Like Teen Spirit” had been released in latter 1991.

          • Blacks in the 80s were buffoons to entertain whites like Mr. T. MTV is the one that really seems to have gotten on message and put the kill switch to all that upbeat British Pop so prevalent during the 80s and switched to Rap and Grunge.

          • This was off a Black Website but I have studied this and I find it very ironic that many of the dates add up. The letter was supposedly written by a music insider now living in retirement in Europe who describes a early 1991 meeting in which they were told by government figures that Gangsta Rap Music was to be promoted and all efforts in the Music Industry were to be placed behind making Gangsta Rap popular. In 1991 Gangsta Rap was a subculture few people paid much attention too outside the ghettoes. By 1993 it was everywhere.

            http://www.hiphopisread.com/2012/04/secret-meeting-that-changed-rap-music.html

            For what its worth if it is true the dates add up very well.

          • Bill Clinton didn’t necessarily marginalize Jesse Jackson, what Clinton did was assert his position among Black people as the head nigger in charge. Clinton’s verbal slap on Sista Souljah while simultaneously pushing antiwhite ideas was pure genius and pure evil all at the same time. Jackson, seeing that Clinton was the sure thing because he could out-nigger the blackest dude in the hood jumped on board. Remember Jesse Jackson was Bill’s personal minister and spiritual advisor while in office.

            The elimination of Hair Metal and mainstream rock around 1992 from the charts and its temporary replacement with Grunge was the best thing that happened to Rap Music as compared to Grunge, Rap looked cool, fresh and fun. You have to remember most of the large Heavy Metal Acts, Judas Priest, Iron Maiden, Ozzy Osbourne Kiss had been in the game for almost twenty years and LA Metal bands like Motley Crue and Ratt had been in the game for over eleven. Metallica had been by 1992 in the game for a decade themselves. They released Metallica Metallica in 1991 and didnt release another album till 1996 after grunge was dead.

            In retrospect 1992 was the PERFECT STORM. The undercurrent of Gangsta Rap entered the mainstream, Rodney King gave the Negroes their first hero since MLK and the marginalization of relatively harmless R and B and Negroes such as Bill Cosby (We didn’t know he was a molester) MC Hammer and Will Smith and their replacement by Dr Dre and Snoop Dogg. Even Don Cornelius, the father of Soul Train although he did allow Rap acts on his show was highly critical of the music and said later that it drove him out of the business. Combine this with the ascendancy of Bill Clinton, openly proclaiming himself Pro-Negro and you have the world we know today.

            I remember when the LA Riots happened I had just turned 16 and I remember putting up a Rebel Flag in the front yard and being made to take it down because I put in tape on it White Power. It wasnt that i hated Negroes, I wasnt racially aware then I just wanted the world I knew a couple of days before back. I remember telling my mother nothing will ever be the same again.

            In regards to race the following dates October 16 1859 JOHN BROWN RAID November 6 1860 LINCOLN ELECTION December 20 1860 SC SECEDES April 12, 1861 SUMTER, April 9, 1865 APPOMATOX April 15th 1865 LINCOLN DEATH March 4, 1877 RECONSTRUCTION ENDS FOR ABOUT 70 years July 26 1948 TRUMAN DESEGREGATES US MIL, May 17th 1954 BROWN vs BOARD December 1 1955 ROSA PARKS August 28, 1963 I HAVE A DREAM, July 2nd 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, August 6 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT October 3 1965 IMMIGRATION ACT and April 4 1968 KINGS DEATH were among others the greatest game changers and except for a couple of them were all defeats for us.

            As an Addendum I would also add to this list, March 3, 1991 RODNEY KING IS BEATEN, April 29 1992 LA RIOTS, November 3, 1992 CLINTON ELECTION June 12 1994 NICOLE BROWN SIMPSON MURDER, April 19 1995 OKC BOMBING October 3 1995 OJ ACQUITTAL and November 5 2008.OBAMA Of course there are many more, but I picked these dates as the starts of epochs in regards to the problems we face today.

          • About the only thing I’m inclined to disagree with you about, Billy Ray, is the Jesse Jackson thing. As I recall, Jackson flipped when Clinton pulled the Sister Souljah thing. Thereafter, as the Clinton presidency got underway, Jackson was out in the cold, where he was given to passive-aggressive mispronunciation of Hillary’s maiden name. (“Hillary RODMAN Clinton,” he called her, and I think Rush Limbaugh still uses that pronunciation, jokingly.) Not until Bill needed him, for “spiritual” credibility, during the Lewinsky scandal, was he ushered into the White House as Bill’s minister and adviser. So, at any rate, is how I remember things.

            Putting that aside, I have to applaud you once again, for an overview with sweep. You’re certainly right that the heavy metal bands had been around for quite a long time when grunge, at last, swept them away. When I was seeing Metallica T-shirts and the like on youngsters around 1989 or 1990, I was asking myself, “Am I misremembering something? Haven’t these bands been around for a while?” It was probably 1983 when I saw Motley Crue seated around a table in an L.A. restaurant where I was having lunch with co-workers. They–Motley Crue–were in their full look: the hair, the garb. They looked as if they’d just stepped out of MTV.

            Your list of significant dates in America’s racial history is really good. I’m surprised to hear how much you were affected, emotionally, by the L.A. riots. When those took place, I was thirty-eight years old, but I doubt they would have hit me hard even if I’d been a teenager, as you were. I’ve simply never taken negroes seriously; my sole thought with respect to them is that whites and they should not be living among each other.

          • I was emotionally affected by the LA Riots because for the first time in my short life, I saw white politicians blaming whites on tv for the riots and even disrespecting Reginald Denny. True this had also happened in the 1960s but after the 1980s when things had been relatively calm and White America relatively safe we just took it for granted what the Negroes were capable of. We used to shop in the ghetto and never had any trouble with them. They gave us our space and we did them.

            The riots affected me because I knew life would never be the same again a premonition if you will and I was right nothing has been right in the United States since Rodney King. I remember Mom didnt even want to go shopping because she said that the Blacks were out of control.

            I remember saying then, why doesn’t some men get guns go down there and shoot these rioters dead? When no one did i saw for the first time what a bunch of scum our leaders were.

          • Yes, well, as I say, Billy Ray, it’s always been different for me. From an early age, I sensed a great difference between blacks and whites–between blacks and all the other human types, really. Never, I’m pretty sure, have I thought blacks and whites should be living among each other, and never have blacks’ periodic outbursts, their rioting, distressed me. Those outbursts have seemed to me a natural consequence of blacks’ presence in a civilization to which they are, as a group, not really suited, one in which their lot is a sort of constant frustration and humiliation, unlike any condition that has ever been experienced, suffered, by any other human breed.

            As is known by Mr. W., our website host, here at Occidental Dissent, I blame the South for the L.A. riots, the Ferguson riots, the black murders and mutilations of white women. I have said to him more than once in discussions here that it was the South’s insistence on retaining slavery that made impossible any sort of North-South alliance that could have made an end run around those abolitionists who wanted blacks to be free, among whites, in the U.S. There were Southerners such as Hinton Helper who would have been part of an alliance, and I’m sure there were many Northerners whose views are like mine today and who thus would have been a part of one, too.

            Well, whatever were the actions of the past, the problem remains, in my view, the presence of blacks among whites. That is not a scientific problem, like cancer; it’s a political problem, which is to say a problem that admits of a solution. Since I paid no real attention to the L.A. riots, I don’t know what was said by politicians about Reginald Denny; but if anything that was said was something that I might be inclined to find objectionable, well, then, that, too, I probably wouldn’t have taken that very seriously, because I’d have regarded it as simply a manifestation of the basic failure to face the real problem. I don’t want to see blacks whipped or shot so that they’ll live somewhat quietly among us. I want them and us apart from each other.

            PS As good as your list of important dates in America’s racial history is, it’s incomplete. Dates such as the arrival of the first black slaves in plantation Carolina or the legalization of slavery in originally slavery-free Georgia could certainly be added to it.

          • I just hit the big ones the ones I felt changed everything. John Brown’s raid changed everything as did Lincoln’s Election followed by SC seceding and Sumter, which proved to the world the South was serious. Lincolns assasination also helped change the direction of things. Of course the Inaguration of Rutherford B Hayes which finally ended the Reconstruction period on Saturday March 3rd 1877 (his public one was March 5 as the 4th was a Sunday). Hayes started the period of benign neglect, where the majority of Northern Republicans largely ignored the Negroes and would do so until following WW2. From 1877 until 1948 there were only a few major dates in that list of course after 1948 it has been one horror after another.

            The South had absolutely no choice but to have slavery, as until the 1960’s there was no other way but hand labor to harvest cotton effectively. Even today cotton farmers sometimes send men into glean what falls from the cotton harvester. Had the Confederacy been its own nation all of us would have been better off. Of course this fact is much more easily seen today then say in 1861. Unfortunately with all things there is a Time Lag which means that the worst effects often are not revealed immediately,

          • “The South had absolutely no choice but to have slavery, as until the 1960’s there was no other way but hand labor to harvest cotton effectively.”

            I’ll put the question directly, Billy Ray: Do you find nothing morally objectionable in the enslavement of blacks?

          • I have no problem with the institution of slavery myself, it has existed since cave men days. Had i lived before 1860 I would have supported it with all my being. Now would I want it today? Not really the day for that sort of thing is over with. However I do believe Negroes need to be controlled in some shape or form

          • “[T]he day for that sort of thing is over with.”

            I’ll be blunt, Billy Ray: Those are weasel words. The only reason the “day for that is over with” is that the abolitionists succeeded in bringing that day to an end. Their genius prevailed against the combined might of those who supported slavery “with all their being,” as you say you would have.

            You have the temerity to speak of slavery’s passing as if it were something that occurred in the natural order of things, not in the vast blood-spilling that was caused by those who fought “with all their being” to preserve that “institution.” In an age in which the South is One Million times more prosperous than it ever was antebellum, you and the rest of the Dixie diehards would parasitically drive along modern roads, through modern cities, built by free men, to lay wreaths at memorials to men who fought to preserve brutality like that to which the image below testifies. And what is your justification? Well, you blithely inform me, as if it were news, as if it were an argument, such brutality “has existed since cave men days.”

            The only reason you say you wouldn’t “really” want slavery today is that you haven’t the nerve to say otherwise. Every one of you Dixie diehards, including our website host, Mr. W., would lay a wreath at a Confederate Memorial and then, if you were confronted by a TV news reporter, right there, who were to ask whether your act of reverence doesn’t amount to support of slavery, would play dumb. “Support of slavery? I’m just celebrating my heritage.”

            For a century-and-a-half, every one of you has heaped abuse on the memory of the abolitionists and of Lincoln. Every one of you has missed no opportunity to scorn or belittle “the Union,” “the North,” the “Yankees” who smashed your slave polity to pieces. Not for a single minute, of a single day, of a single year, in the whole of that century-and-a-half, has a single one of you fooled anyone.

            Here at this website, I have tried–tried, Billy Ray–to find common ground with you Dixieheads, but you and I both know there is no such ground to be found. We hold each other in contempt.

          • Weasel words or not, when I mean the day for that sort of thing is over with I mean that the technological boom since 1945 has eliminated the need for thousands of human laborers. Slavery was to me just another form of human labor, it wasn’t perfect and yes there were evil men who deserved to have their slaves taken from them for how they acted toward them BUT inhumane behavior by a few, just like how there are inhumane pet owners no more imparts a label of all encompassing evil on slavery as it does on owning dogs or cats.

            In Conclusion there are upsides and downsides to slavery just like there are upsides and downsides to free labor. The one benefit to the slave system over the free unfettered capitalistic system was that it decentralized wealth, instead of centralized wealth in the hands of a few corporations. I could explain more but it would take awhile

          • “[W]hen I mean the day for that sort of thing is over with I mean that the technological boom since 1945 has eliminated the need for thousands of human laborers.”

            Oh, right. If only the North had been a little more patient …

            “Slavery was to me just another form of human labor … ”

            Yes–and forced prostitution is just another form of lovemaking, a fact I’m sure you’ve impressed upon your daughters or nieces.

            “[Y]es there were evil men who deserved to have their slaves taken from them for how they acted toward them … ”

            And no doubt the annals of the antebellum South include stories of noble Southerners who acted to get rid of those few bad apples–just about the time the Union troops were closing in, probably.

            “BUT inhumane behavior by a few, just like how there are inhumane pet owners no more imparts a label of all encompassing evil on slavery as it does on owning dogs or cats.”

            In a sense, you’re right about that: It’s not the lashings but the slavery itself, the being forced to work for another, that’s the evil. Even if, as I very much doubt, the slave in the photograph I presented in my previous comment is the only Southern slave who was ever whipped, the South deserved to be destroyed, just as the USSR would have deserved to be destroyed even if there hadn’t been a Gulag. The Communism itself was the evil; the labor camps were just the spectacular aspect of it.

            “In Conclusion there are upsides and downsides to slavery just like there are upsides and downsides to free labor. The one benefit to the slave system over the free unfettered capitalistic system was that it decentralized wealth, instead of centralized wealth in the hands of a few corporations.”

            Be sure to remind yourself of that should you ever be enslaved yourself.

            Allow me to state the rule, Billy Ray: If I want to hear a Southerner engage in evasion, obfuscation, and bullshit generally, I’ll watch one of Charles Manson’s parole hearings.

          • PS No–now that I think about it, it wasn’t that Spike Lee was celebrating race-mixing merely visually: he was celebrating it narratively. The very idea that the interracial attraction was a “fever,” something natural, which was experienced by fashionable characters, was intended to make opposition to it–including Lee’s own ostensible opposition to it–seem somehow priggish, moralistic, unromantic. The opposition was a pose; the celebration was the point.

          • Another odd point with that movie is Spike wrote that as a slam and discouragement against Negroes who did it, in fact he once attacked Whoopi Goldberg on tv for doing it and he did mock others as well. Although i sense his attitude has softened as he attended Michael Jordans wedding to that white woman hes with now.

        • Nightowl, I object to your post, which is a manifestation of the fatal white problem: foolishness. With a moment’s Googling, you could have learned that our fellow commenter Debbie Johnson didn’t invent the term “telegony.” It was coined by the biologist August Weismann and is simply a combination of the Greek root “tele,” meaning “far” (as in “telephone” or “television”) and “gonos,” meaning “seed, race, offspring” (as in “gonad,” or as in somewhat-indirectly-related words like “genus” and “gene”). It’s one of those ancient ideas that never quite go away, though present-day science seems to have found little support for it. The idea, in the context of this discussion, would be that a white woman’s offspring by a white man would somehow be black, at least partially, if she’d copulated with a black at some point (i.e., prior to the conception that resulted from her intercourse with the white man).

          Really, Nightowl, I dislike speaking harshly to any white, but reflexive anti-intellectualism is whites’ bane. If whites, on average, were as quick to consult dictionaries as they are to complain about “big words,” the Jews wouldn’t be crushing them.

          • It’s not copulation that ruins a White woman. It’s impregnation. A woman and her fetus begin to exchange tissue. Tiny amounts of the cell tissue of the fetus travel to, and STAY, in the brain tissue of the mother. Where-as copulation with beasts is repugnant, if a female does not become pregnant, there is still a chance for reclamation. If she does – she’s gone for good.

          • Thanks for the correction, Denise. Having just now revisited Wikipedia on the subject, I see, yes, the following (which, though lacking a verb in its second sentence, is clear):

            “The idea of Telegony goes back to Aristotle. It implies that the signs of the individual, not only inherited from his parents, but also from other males, from which his/her mother had a PREVIOUS PREGNANCY.” (Emphasis mine)

            The Wikipedia article has a section headed “Recent developments,” which is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegony_(pregnancy)#Recent_developments Therein is the following:

            “Professor Leonard A. Herzenberg of Stanford University in
            1979 for the first time proved that fetal DNA can pass into the mother during pregnancies. Fred Hutchinson Cancer
            Research Center in 2012 has shown that it is not uncommon for fetal DNA to get through the blood–brain barrier and into the brain of the mother. Leiden University Medical Center in the same year published a result which indicates fetal DNA from previous pregnancies can enter the bodies of younger siblings.”

          • You need to get out of the city and live and work on a farm.
            You don’t need a college de education, just interact with creation and forget everything that you learned in Philly.
            Have a goo wone.

          • I can see why the wording of my first statement on the subject gave you the impression I was dismissing telegony, Mr. Premo, but I was not.

          • Not sure about that, Denise. The White women I have known whom have bedded down niggers actually adopt the personality of the nigger.

            They get the “beaten down” look. You can especially see it in their eyes – they become dead – just like a niggers eyes.

          • A few years ago, Ronnie, for reasons I needn’t detail, I was driving through Mt. Airy and Germantown, two neighborhoods in Philadelphia’s northwest wing. In my early childhood, Germantown had been my grandparents’ neighborhood, but it has been a ghetto for half a century now. To my astonishment, on this occasion of which I speak, a young white woman was pushing a baby, in a stroller, right across Germantown Avenue, while my car was stopped in traffic, probably at a traffic light. The young black guy who was presumably the baby’s father was giving her virtually no attention as he strode before her in his casual, summer clothes, which included long, loose-fitting shorts of a type that probably has a name, though I don’t know it. The young woman herself, a bit chunky, maybe with acne, and sporting bobbed, brownish-blonde hair that might have been a dye job, had her eyes cast down and was moving slowly and silently–joylessly. She was a portrait of demoralization such as I have never elsewhere seen.

          • Impregnated or not, cells are absorbed in the mixing of the beast’s seed in the vaginal tract. I n 7 years all of the body’s cells have been replaced with her original DNA code. Providing that adulteration is not repeated.
            The nigglet offspring and it’s lineage is forever polluted.

          • Any one involved in animal husbandry or hard, real science knows that telegony has been proven through experimental proof. Pre WW2 Germany experimenting with horses and zebras comes to mind. Debbie Johnson is not the one spouting foolishness. IT IS YOU!
            You should look into the subject. If you are not a jew troll, which I doubt.

          • As I said in response to your other comment, Mr. Premo, I was not dismissing telegony, though I can see why my original statement on the subject gave you the impression I was. I was trying to support Debbie Johnson, who had been scorned for the use of “big words.”

      • With all the mudsharks out there who go back and forth across the color line, I reckon most of the future generation will all be affected by this. UNLESS we take drastic meausres

        • No wonder men don’t like the idea of bedding down a slut and having a child with her. instinct

          • Yes–and a woman is never confronted in any other respect, either, with even the slightest possibility that her child is not actually hers. As the militants of the sexual revolution were overturning the old mores in the 1960s and ’70s, they decried the “double standard,” i.e., the difference between the rules that were applied to the sexual behavior of men and those that were applied to the sexual behavior of women. That difference was based in the difference between the reproductive function of women and that of men.

      • Debbie —

        To clarify:

        Nothing I have posted here was intended to dismiss your remark about telegony. When I objected to Nightowl’s objection to your use of “big words,” I was defending your mention of telegony, whose simple Greek root-words, as you know, I mentioned.

        A pair of comments below, by James Premo, make clear that he, James, thought–not unreasonably–that I was dismissing telegony. I say “not unreasonably” because, in my comment to Nightowl, I described telegony as “one of those ancient ideas that never quite go away, though present-day science seems to have found little support for it.” From Wikipedia, rightly or wrongly, I did get the impression that science has found little to support telegony, but I wasn’t suggesting I’d concluded the scientific question is settled. If anything, with respect to sexual interaction between white women and black men, I’d think it best to err on the side of EXTREME CAUTION with respect to the possibility of telegony.

        After reading and responding to the comments by James, I Googled and found a 2014 paper about experiments conducted on a species of fly. In the “Discussion” at the paper’s conclusion is the following:

        “Our results show that it is possible for a male to transmit features of his phenotype via non-genetic semen-borne factors to his mate’s offspring sired by another male.”

        As you can see from that sentence, the paper seems to report that the telegony the researchers spotted doesn’t even require impregnation by the previous male. That’s a subject that I checked at Wikipedia after Denise mentioned it, in response to the comment I made to Nightowl. James Premo expressed the view that impregnation is not necessary for the telegony; and as I’ve just said, the 2014 paper seems to support his view.

        I myself haven’t yet read the whole 2014 paper; but if you’d like to look at it, it’s at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282758/

      • PS Having now looked through “Revisiting Telegony,” the 2014 scientific paper I linked in my previous reply to you, Debbie, I’m in a position to say the experimental results it reports are remarkable. Not only did offspring exhibit a trait of a previous mate of their mother (i.e., a mate other than their “putative sire”); the trait was an ACQUIRED trait, a non-genetic trait, of the previous mate.

        If I have understood the paper, which contains much technical jargon with which I’m unfamiliar, the experiment went as follows:

        Step 1: A certain number of flies in their larval stage were fed a diet that is known to have an effect on their adult size, i.e., to increase it.

        Step 2: In their adulthood, these larger-than-average flies, known as “high condition” flies, were mated with females whose eggs were not yet mature. The immature eggs can not be fertilized, of course, but they can be penetrated by sperm and, I think, other materials in the semen that carries the sperm. It seems the makeup of some of these seminal materials–i.e., semen-borne materials other than the sperm themselves–varies with the condition of the male. In other words, the seminal materials of these high-condition males is different from that of males of average size.

        Step 3: Two weeks later, when the female’s eggs were mature, the females were mated with average-size males who fertilized their eggs and produced offspring.

        Step 4: The adult size of the offspring was measured. There was a correlation, apparently of some significance, between the size of the offspring and the size of the first mate, i.e., the non-sire.

        Without getting into detail, which I myself didn’t bother to follow, I’ll say the experiment was conducted a few different ways, to clarify the effects. There had to be cases, for instance, in which the first mate was one of average size, so that the influence of first mates of different sizes could be compared. The main thing, as I’ve said, is that the first mate’s trait not only showed up in offspring he didn’t sire but that the trait that showed up was an ACQUIRED one, not a genetic one. The trait, as I’ve indicated, was largeness that he’d acquired not from his genes but from what he’d eaten in his “infancy.”

        In all cases, the DNA of the offspring was checked, to make sure the sire was the second mate, not the first one. The size of the offspring, in other words, seems to have been influenced not by DNA of the first mate but by other semen-borne materials of the first mate. The hypothesis is that the semen-borne materials, which were able to get into the egg while it was immature, affected the egg’s development and thus the size of the offspring who were eventually produced, by another mate. Once the egg is mature, it’s difficult for those non-sperm materials to get into the egg; so basically, only those non-sperm materials of the first mate got into the eggs.

        At the risk of violating copyright, I’ll present, below, the diagram of the hypothesized mechanism. The “blue” represents the non-sperm materials that get into the egg from the first mate; the red is the DNA of the second mate. The diagram may be viewed in its entirety at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282758/figure/fig01/

  30. silly white people deserved every bit of it. Thinking they can vote their way out of an (((eskimo)))-globalist open-borders deathtrap that is already 2/3 closed. But they’ll learn. The hard way

  31. I’m using this incidence to point out, in no uncertain terms, that this is a RACE WAR.

        • Created BY the Spanish – Europeans – not hideous violent repulsive little Indio trolls.

        • The Indios that cross our borders now had nothing to do with Spain or the natives Americans who inhabited the land Pre Spanish occupation.

          Mexican hierarchy is still White, they are dumping their trash across our border.

    • The mostly White USA took control of California and turned it into one of the most prosperous and idyllic destinations in all of North America. California is only California because European-Americans hand the guiding hand in its creation.

      At the same time, Mexico stagnated and reverted to its more primitive state as Spain’s influence was lessened. Poverty, violence, corruption, incompetence and mismanagement became synonymous with Mexico and Mexican people.

      And as predictable as a sunrise, more Mexicans have flooded into California, creating soaring levels of violence, corruption, poverty, incompetence and mismanagement at all levels of government and social life where the White European influence has lessened.

      Mexicans are really good at creating third-world shitholes. If Mexicans and other non-White people of Central and South America are such competent people able to create prosperous and civilized societies, then why are the prosperous and civilized parts of Mexico, Central and South America mostly confined to where the White European influence is still strong and mostly in control?

      • Mexico inherited it’s “claims” from the Spanish crown which had the tenacity to claim half the world. We actually put the boots on the ground and went out to these wildernesses to build something. California was very sparsely populated when we won the Mexican War, nobody was kicked out and it’s original Spanish settlers were allowed to stay on as Americans. The migrants coming in illegally have roots in southern Mexico thousands of miles away. There of course is no reasoning with their logic, they want to believe it’s theirs and nothing will dissuade them of that other than raw naked force.

    • Wrong! Mexico had little if any control over Alta California in the 1820s in fact it was basically self-governing. Most of the Spanish Elite in California wanted to become an Independent Nation as it was hundreds of miles from Mexico City and nothing could ever get done there.

  34. Since these pro illegal alien thugs like to mix it up, put a $1,000+ bounty dead or alive reward on each illegal alien’s head and let the bounty hunters give them a “warm reception” and drag them into the jails/morgues and we will have the illegal immigration problem solved in weeks instead of years….

  36. Cassius Clay (A.K.A. Muhammed Ali) just died, I suspect we are know going to be reminded once again by Obama just where his sympathies lie. I bet this guy is going to give Cassius Clay, one of the most notorious hate whitey blacks in our lifetime a state funeral way past what he did for any traditional Americans who passed during his regime. At a minimum he will attend the funeral and deliver a big eulogy. I’ve just got a gut feeling on this one, I’d lay some money down at Vegas if they had a line on this, Obama is going to be personally involved in this guy’s funeral. The media blew Prices death way out of proportion, but at least the guy was famous for a few happy songs back during an era of good feelings that most middle aged people can related too. This Cassius Clay creep did nothing positive for white people and is only canonized because the jewish media sympathized with his anti-American rhetoric. If they harped on Prince for days, imagine the benediction that is coming for this guy.

  37. Next time some Jew filth makes some joke about Southern Inbreeding tell them about this article.

    New study concludes that all Ashkenazi Jews can trace their ancestry to a “bottleneck” of just 350 individuals, dating back to between 600 and 800 years ago.
    Columbia professor Itsik Pe’er, told the Live Science website that among Ashkenazi Jews, “everyone is a 30th cousin.”

    http://www.timesofisrael.com/ashkenazi-jews-descend-from-350-people-study-finds/

  38. Can’t anybody on our side organize to defend the Trump people against this kind of shit? Letting girls get hit in the face? Pepper spray at least for the social warrior asshats.

    • Yes, some of us have the ability to help organize some type of resistance. But you’d be surprised how anemic support can be when you start looking for others to help you put things in motion.

    • Thousands and thousands of White People are at the very beginning of the racial learning curve. They have to learn for themselves. I’ll bet that many of the people that were there would still tell you “But I’m not a racist!”. The smart ones will get it, and take measures to protect themselves.
      All things in their time.

  39. I don’t see what the problem is for the rioters. They want to turn the U.S. into Mehico, but Mehico already exists. It’s a short bus trip away. The place they prefer is right there, just a few hours south at most. What is the issue then?

  40. Hunter, why don’t you link to your Twitter? Good stuff there.

    Ben Howe @BenHowe

    Ever think that maybe we ARE smarter than you? Eh…probably not.

    Hunter Wallace ?@occdissent
    Hunter Wallace Retweeted Ben Howe

    LOL no. Your wife is a smart woman. She left you at Starbuck’sHunter Wallace added,

  43. Hunter, per our good goys at FTN they mentioned the high frequency of synagogues in the golden triangle back in the good old days. As that is your cup of tea, give us some insight!

    • Back in the days when the Golden Circle was the main topic here, at Occidental Dissent, I began to get the impression that a bound compilation of news articles having to do with one or another of “the oldest synagogues in the New World” would be virtually an atlas of the slave trade.

  44. Loathsome little cucktards.

    ‘Red State’ Editors Support Democrat Mob Attacks on American Trump Supporters: ‘Deserve to be Beaten’
    http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/04/red-state-editors-support-democrat-mob-attacks-on-american-trump-supporters-deserve-to-be-beaten/

    Neil Stevens, a contributing editor to the “Red State” blog, believes that Americans should be attacked by Mexicans for supporting a candidate who promises to enforce U.S. immigration laws.

    Stevens complained Trump supporters “deserve to be beaten” by Democrat hordes and illegal aliens burning the American flag, and that Trump is a “Nazi.”

    Neil Stevens @presjpolk

    I warned you he was a Nazi. You didn’t listen. Now you have street fighting like Weimar Germany. #NeverTrump

    • Obviously Mr. Stevens is either a Jew or serves them loyally. This guy makes as much sense as blaming the murder victim for being murdered. So far I have seen no Trump supporters fight back, but I have seen the slime do so. I suggested long ago that Trump should use Outlaw Biker Gangs and Private Security at his events. I still stand by that suggestion.

      • Biker gangs are a bad idea, because many of them are basically organized crime outfits. However, private security should be used to protect Trump supporters at rallies. Ex-soldiers would also be a good idea for security too. Many of them are really ticked at the bum in the White House, and would love to help Trump.

        • Yes thats true the biker element does add a criminal element which can be viewed negatively but there are thousands of ex-soldiers in the USA who would be willing to do the job if they were allowed to do it. I think Trumps only failure so far is not nipping it in the bud and hiring a Blackwater like group of contractors to protect his supporters in and out of the arenas. By any means necessary

    • None of these bastards went nuts over McCain or Romney.
      I don’t think this fervor is over trade, so it must have something to do with love for Third World migrants, wars and Israel. Foreigners.

  45. Paul Ryan @SpeakerRyan

    #Republicans lose personality contests. But we win ideas contests. We owe you that choice. http://spkrryan.us/1Rl0wQa

    Hunter Wallace ?@occdissent
    Hunter Wallace Retweeted Paul Ryan

    Didn’t you lose in 2012?Hunter Wallace added,

  47. Funny that the haters of “hate” hate our race in general and Trump in particular.

  49. Neil Stevens
    @presjpolk

    Nikki Haley was right.

    Jim Kelley ?@JimKelley7
    @presjpolk @EWErickson

    About what was Haley right?

    Neil Stevens ?@presjpolk 7h
    @JimKelley7 @EWErickson

    Taking down the traitor flag from the SC capital grounds

    • The Mexican flag flying over illegal alien rioters in California is just fine. It’s good that they’re beating Americans. And didn’t this cuck shithead suggest arming them against Trump people ( or was it another of the scum)? Traitor flag?

      I hope the idiot donors who pay these creeps to write their nonsense close their checkbooks.

  50. Supercuck French says he’s not running for president. No doubt hundreds of voters are disappointed.

Comments are closed.