The Brexit Assassination

When I wrote the previous article this morning on violent vanguardists, I had not heard of what is unfolding overseas in the UK on the eve of the Brexit vote:

“Hichem Ben Abdallah, 56, was in the cafe next door to the library when he heard screaming and went outside.

He said: ‘There was a guy who was being very brave and another guy with a white baseball cap who he was trying to control and the man in the baseball cap suddenly pulled a gun from his bag.

‘He was fighting with her and wrestling with her and then the gun went off and then she fell between two cars and I came and saw her bleeding on the floor.’

It was earlier thought Ms Cox had intervened in a fight between two men but it is now believed she was attacked.
After around 15 minutes, the shop owner said emergency services arrived and tended to her with a drip.

Mr Abdallah said the weapon looked handmade and that the man who had been wrestling with the assailant continued to do so even after he saw the gun.

He said: ‘The man stepped back with the gun and fired it and then he fired a second shot, as he was firing he was looking down at the ground.’

Aamir Tahir, of The Dry Clean Centre, said the gunman was heard shouting ‘Britain first’.

He said: ‘The lady I work with heard two loud bangs. I wish I was there because I would have tried to stop him.
‘Apparently the guy who did it shouted ‘Britain first’ and if I had been there I would have tackled him.’

Britain First is the name of a far-Right group which said it was ‘not involved and would never encourage behaviour of this sort’. …”

Either one of two things has happened here: either this is the definition of a ‘false flag’ attack, or it is yet another example of exactly the sort of stupidity we dealt with last year and I wrote about this morning.

About Hunter Wallace 12380 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent


  1. here’s some truth

    In THE REVENGE OF THE NERDS, nebbish Jew-like characters use their superior wits against a blonde ‘Aryan’ fraternity. But they still lack for muscle and manliness, so they ally with a Macho Black Fraternity. It’s like how Jews waged their War on Whiteness. They used their brains, but wit wasn’t enough to topple white prestige.

    In order to destroy white manhood, they needed the alliance with a kind of manhood that could beat up whites. Jews allied with Negroes and promoted black brawn to de-legitimize white manliness. that was beaten by black fists in sports. So, white boys came to worship Negro athletes and white girls now have babies with Negroes.

    Jews rub their hands in glee.

    Jewish War on Christianity is of secondary importance. White people can still be powerful without Christianity. Indeed, the demise of Christianity may only empower whites by ridding them of the soft heart of universal brotherhood and Christian guilt that is the prototype of ‘white guilt’.

    But when white men lose manly pride and their women to Negroes, the white race is over and done with. Whiteness has been destroyed at the genetic level. A white ‘leftist’ can be ideologically made into a white nationalist with a change of mind. But a mudshark uses her white womb to produce black babies for black men. Her womb has turned traitor at the biological level.

    Jews want to turn all white women onto jungle fever and turn white men into a bunch of pansy cucks via all this multi-gender identification that encourages even straight white males to see themselves as fey if not ‘gay’.

  2. If this guy had thrown a water balloon filled with vile liquids the result would have been mostly positive.

    Nationalists need to use the effective tactics, weapons of the Left.

    Guns, guns, guns simply DOESN’T, DOESN’T, DOESN’T work for our side.

    Frustrated, angry, stupid and YES HATEFUL people and actions do not help.

    • Are you implying the Left’s tactics aren’t violent? I can direct you to plenty of videos with whites getting the shit kicked out of them without the need of a gun. If you are implying the left doesn’t use violence you haven’t been paying attention. And further, the left’s violence works because it supports the globalist media narrative.

      • The Marxists hold power, and love wielding raw power. We don’t. They are allowed and encouraged to do ANYTHING they want. We are persecuted for disputing arguable historical “facts”.

      • Agreed that the Left uses violence – but it is very rarely or really never out right gun murder as was done here. The Left uses harassment, defamation, DOXING to get what they want.

        • WRONG, the Left is all about murder, mass murder. Go research the Ukrainian Holodomor for a clue as to what will happen to white Britons if they do not take back control of their country. You will see the Left for what it is.

        • “Agreed that the Left uses violence – but it is very rarely or really never out right gun murder”

          The basic difference is that the “Left” uses violence to destroy the White race, while the “Right” uses violence in self-defense.

          There are excellent reasons to kill the left-wing maniacs who want to destroy the White race. That’s why you have a Breivik from time to time.

          On the other hand, the leftists don’t have any good reason to try to kill us. I think they are anti-White because they are manipulated by the Jews. But the Jews won’t let them shoot nationalists because that would be too obvious. It would cause a backlash.

          When we do the bookkeeping, I think the murders and homicides committed by third-world immigrants should be attributed to our anti-White enemies. At the same time, we have to remember that the deliberate destruction of White people through race replacement is something much worse than having a few thousand Whites killed by non-Whites every year.

          Another point: If someone who is left-wing opposes race replacement and kills a third-world parasite or a White traitor, he will be called right-wing by the Jews in the media. So, when the real issue is race, it’s better and more precise to say pro-White and anti-White, rather than right-wing and left-wing.

  3. They’re retracting the “Britain First” thing. It was clearly a smear which I hope will rebound on the New World Order, but both sides are working hard to dampen emotions at this point so it probably won’t.

    The only way a person would kill a photogenic MP and shout “Britain First” 7 days before the referendum would be if it was done by the New World Order.

    People are crazy, but they aren’t that crazy.

    • No! Eyewitnesses are now repeating the “Britain First” cry on the evening news.

      Maddening news.

      • If you give a link, it helps people follow your statements.

        I am going with total false flag, even if this was a lone wolf attack.

        The dude was a mentally ill welfare recipient. The type that supports Communism and Labour. What better way to help the cause then to kill someone and try to pin it on Brexit / Far Right.

        There is also the possibility of an activated asset. You would have to give major props to the New World Order if that was the case. Very cunning.

  4. How did a White Limey get a gun in the first place? VERY English names cited in that article – “Mr Abdallah” “Amir” – yup. Very English. So ENGLISH. I know this will be used to frighten actual vestigial English into voting to stey. If is does, so be it. They should be a lot more terrified of the names of the witnesses, cited in the article. The atrocities against White English girl children has done NOTHING, to help the English reclaim England – so who knows. We are being exterminated do the molecular-deep White genetic Normie Imperative to be “nice”.

      • “looks like a classic beta/omega Englishman”

        He looks completely normal.

        I think that murder is unlikely to help the Remain side.

        • Odd coincidence that just yesterday, only days after the Orlando Homocaust, a House committee voted unanimously to pass a ‘mental health’ bill introduced by Big Pharma’s biggest shill, Congressman Tim Murphy. The bill will force the feds and state governments to fund inpatient ‘treatment,’ among other Stasi State measures.

          Then the Senate democrats filibustered for 15 hours for overt gun control.

          One party plays good cop while the other, bad cop, and reverses roles and angles. But it all adds up to the same thing. They’re coming for our guns, and for dissidents.

          Just like it’s a bizarre coincidence that on the eve of the very popular Brexit vote a white conservative man shoots a lefty white woman MP, and just happens to be ‘mentally ill.’

          It’s all one gigantic coincidence.

    • “Hichem Ben Abdallah”, “Aamir Tahir”, …

      My guess is that the successor of the murdered MP will be a Pakistani or an Arab. It would have made her proud.

      On the whole, the race-replacement of the English people is going along nicely. Not a lot of resistance from the indigenous population. This incident was only an exception.

      I think if there were more resistance, the race replacement program would have to stop.

        • The debates on TV and in pubs and shops on streets etc have been electrifying.

          It’s been a very grass roots thing and very candid so far. This shooting will shut it down.

          • Well then The English are a stupid as American White Normies. This should have NOTHING to do with Brexit.

          • The funeral is scheduled for the day before the vote. Should, ought wtf?

            This is a nice little Reichstag Fire event complete with a state funeral.

        • no. The open-borders Judeo-globalist deathtrap has already snapped shut on Western Europe and North America. We are not going to vote ourselves out of it

  5. Sigh why could be he have been a Muslim? Killing a Labour MP a week before the vote is so retarded I wouldn’t be surprised if someone paid him.

        • The vulgarity, misanthropy, raging sociopathy and promotion of violence illustrate why he is fringe. We’re better off without people like that in our movement. They are ticking timebombs waiting to explode.

          • I’ll bet his blog passes OD in readership within a few months. You see, he’s a Trump to your Romney.

          • Yeah, yeah… and Alex Linder is going to lead an army of hardcore Aryan supermen to take over the country. We’ve all seen this movie before. We know how it ends. I wouldn’t put too much of my savings or energy into that model, because the ROI sucks.

          • Who said anything about ‘Aryan Supermen’ or ‘ROI’? Let’s see, who is obsessed with these two things? Hmmmm.

          • Nothing wrong with dissent, but there are definitely caustic personality types that you can easily anticipate being major trouble and headaches down the road. Probably a wise choice with that one.

          • It is better for people who have that kind of mindset to go congregate somewhere like VNN Forum for when one of them has their inevitable public meltdown no one else has to deal with the fallout and clean up.

          • The only people that will be attracted to 313Chris’s blog are those who are dysfunctional as he is. If he gets a readership larger than OD, it will be composed of losers like himself. Hopefully, his butt wipe site will act as a magnet to draw vantards like him away from OD.

  6. Brexit was probably going to be a winning cause, until this retard shot a photogenic Bremain campaigner. England just beat Wales in the football too. Spirits high.

    Gove, Farage and Johnson were putting together a wonderful campaign that was resonating and all it took was this tard to completely derail everything.

    • Not so sure.

      Mass of English and Irish on the dole can usually be counted on disappointing voting, $)$&@ like the Irish voting for homo marriage equality, $&@&$ like the Scottish either going for the worst Guardian newspaper cultural Marxism or shouting about independence from middle class White English people, but interdependence, union with 20 million Pakistani and Algerian Muslims!

  7. Just like cops, politicians know the risks. For those that seek power over others there is always a risk of an unknown resentful person challenging that power.

  8. Folks…

    The art of subversion, though often directed at the powers-that-be, tends to be elitist than populist for it thrives on irony, ambiguity, and deception. Subversion isn’t a direct strike at the system. It is a covert act, and the masses are as likely to be hoodwinked as the powers-that-be even if the subversive act is ostensibly carried out in the name of the People.

    In a way, subversion is a two-front war by the avant-garde that disdains both the traditional/established elites and the vulgar-dumb-bigoted masses with ingrained prejudices. The radical vanguard finds the elites to be greedily guarding their unfair or undeserved privileges. But, the vanguard also finds the masses to be ignorant, prejudiced, and brainwashed by the elites.

    If populism assumes that what most people want constitutes the essence of social-political justice, radicalism assumes that the people don’t know what they want since they’ve been kept in the dark from the real truth and raised as sheeple under the influence of corrupt elites. As Thomas Frank wondered in WHAT’S THE MATTER WITH KANSAS?, true radical politics cannot be about what-the-people-want because the people’s hearts-and-minds have been molded by the elites against the people’s own true interests and advantages.

    After all, one reason why communists had a difficult time was not only the repressive violence of the capitalist or ‘reactionary’ elites but the knee-jerk hostility of the masses who’d been indoctrinated by overlord class to see socialists and communists as ‘Godless heathens’ and baby-eating monsters.

    The Alt Right is well-aware of the fact that majority opinion doesn’t necessarily reflect the natural wisdom of the people or what is good for the people. Consider how easily the majority of Americans were won over to the filth of ‘gay marriage’. But did the American people really embrace ‘gay marriage’ on their own or were they fooled into thinking it’s what they want by the elites who control media, academia, law, and the state? If elites can mold mass opinion, then which mass opinion is really of the people and belongs to them?

    Especially when all real cultures & values are dead and have been replaced by fickle fashions of Pop Culture and insipid soma of Political Correctness, opinions and ‘values’ can be changed overnight by the levers of the Cult of the Cool, celebrity-mania, and hype delirium. So, just like the leftist vanguard of yesteryear had to fight a two-front war, the Alternative Right must fight a two-front subversive war against the Globalist Elites and Progot[progressive-bigot] masses whose ideas & values are nothing but poison seeds planted in their minds by Jews, homos, and cuck-traitors. Alt Right needs its own Rules for Radicals.

    • whatever. This bim was a Bremain. A dead globalist…is a good globalist. And, BTW, the (((eskimo)))-stooge political/media hacks in Britain have already served notice that a Brexit would be “very complicated, it would take many years…..”. IOTW, if the Brits vote to Brexit, the vote will be ignored. This is what happens when you give up your guns in return for an (((eskimo)))-administered cradle-to-grave welfare/illfare site. You get the grave

      • Begs the question how he got the gun…but I digress.

        The entire point of Brexit was to make the situation very complicated. If the word complicated is defined as “riven by nationalistic sentiment”.

        One scenario is that a British threat of exit provokes and provides cover for other nationalists like FN or it bumps off Merkel in Germany.

        This MP is scheduled to be buried the day before the plebscite.

  9. According to the English that I read, according to the locals, the assassin is apolitical and not connected to any group. You could say he is disconnected.

  10. People…

    We suffer from Contemporary Conformism or Contemformism.

    This idea believes that the prevailing fashions and trends(as approved and enforced by ruling elites) are the ‘most evolved’ ideals and values, AND THERE IS NO ROOM FOR DEBATE. The debate is over and that’s that.

    If you disagree or dissent, you are reprobate, a degenerate, a caveman, a ‘racist’, a ‘homophobe’, a ‘sexist’, and etc.

    It’s like NYT says ‘gay marriage’ is settled for good, we all need to shut up, and accept it. If you keep arguing, you are ‘less evolved’ or a ‘hater’.

    Contemformism is based on an arrogant conceit that the Current Values are the only right ones, and EVERYONE better conform to them. Of course, Current Values are usually those forcibly or deviously foisted on the populace by the small elite that controls the media and academia and government.

    The elites insist they are totally right, indeed so right that it’s not even worth debating the issues. But their dogmatic confidence betrays anxiety, a fear that if indeed there was free debate and lively culture of controversy, their house of cards will come crumbling down.

    It’s like communist elites insisted that they were most advanced intellectually, morally, and socially. They were so right cuz Marxism is an infallible science. How can anyone argue with such ‘objective truth’?

    So, anyone who raised a fuss was to be seen as a thought criminal, a ‘reactionary’, a ‘capitalist roader’, and ‘bourgeois'(worse epithet in commie world).

    But despite all the authority and bluster, communist elites shut down debate out of fear that free discussion would bring their ideological house of cards crashing all around. That is why Soviets invaded Czechoslovakia in 68. Allow free press and free speech under communism… and communism falls apart.

    So, communism had to rely on contemformism.

    PC does its mini-version of the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovkia over and over. If it spots some dissident voice, it sends in the ‘tanks’ and shuts down the voices. You get Dubceked.

    Difference between communism and PC is the former became a museum/mausoleum piece because the same slogans and dogma were repeated over and over ad nauseum. So, even though dissent wasn’t allowed, people came to see the phoniness since the same old slogans sounded hollower by the year.

    PC, in contrast, is full of nonsense but goes for ideological fashions and trends. Every year has a new crop of crises, hypes, panics, slogans, and etc. It’s the same recycled crap over and over BUT there’s the illusion of ‘progress’ due to all the hype and feverishness.

    If it were ‘rape culture’ every day of every year, even feminists would get tired of it and come to see how stupid it is. But PC keeps on changing focus from homos to trannies to feminists to blacks to illegals to Muslims to black homos to Jewish trannies to fat feminists to whatever. The sheer cult of ‘newness’ creates a dazzling illusion of constant ‘progress’ toward greater evolution of social justice. It’s all just a justice ponzi scheme, but it goes on and on with its different colored confetti.

    In truth, Contemformism shuts down free thought and real ideas because it is based on the conceit that only the LATEST OFFICIAL LINE is true(because it is presumable ‘most evolved’) and all else(all the earlier variations or narratives of discourse) are untrue.

    So, only the latest dogma of feminism is true.

    Only the latest race theory is true.

    Only the latest homo/tranny theory is true.

    Only the latest social theory on ‘diversity’ is true.

    But then, Conzos have developed much the same mind-set. Only the latest line of Conservatism Inc is true and acceptable, and all else must be purged as ‘racist’, ‘antisemitic’, ‘sexist’, ‘homophobic’.

    There used to be a time when, to be a Conservative meant views ranging from timeless to old to traditional to moderate to contemporary. National Review could allow everyone from arch-reactionary to Neocon. It was a big tent. It had room for both segregationists and integrationists, for both MLK critics and MLK-defenders, for both those calling for cautious containment of communism to aggressive rollback.

    But as time passed, NR began to allow only the Latest Line as demanded by Neocons. All other views were to be ‘purged’.

    With such attitude, there cannot be a plurality of ideas and views since only one view(heralded as the ‘most evolved’) is allowed whereas all others are dismissed as ‘reactionary’ or ‘retrograde’ or ‘unacceptable’. Only the Latest View is to be tolerated on the basis that it is ‘most tolerant’.

    But aren’t some values and ideas eternal and timeless? They aren’t less valuable simply because they are ‘old’, just like an idea isn’t necessarily good cuz it happens to be labeled as ‘new’ or ‘radical’ or ‘most evolved’. After all, Archie Bunker of ALL IN THE FAMILY is sometimes right, and Meathead is sometimes wrong. Meathead espouses all the LATEST ideas, and he is sometimes right whereas Bunker can be pigheaded and ignorant. But sometimes, Bunker’s views are more honest and close to the truth, however ugly it may be. Indeed, judging by how NYers reacted to black crime in the 90s, Bunkerism was the savior of the Big Apple after yrs of failed Meathead policy.

    Indeed, haven’t many ‘latest ideas’ been proven wrong? Communism was a big one.

    But so many theories about race, sex, culture, education, nutrition, and etc proved to be wrong. Consider the wrongheaded war on butter in favor of worthless margarine.

    It used to be article of faith that saturated fat was the main killer.

    So, just because some idea or view happens to be the ‘latest’ or billed as ‘most evolved’ doesn’t mean that it is necessarily better than an older idea that may have been foolishly rejected or falsely discredited or only partly discredited. (Never throw out the baby with the bathwater.) Consider Stephen Gould’s bogus study of Morton’s skulls. It was accepted as TRUTH for so long until someone proved that Morton’s earlier study had actually been correct.

    Now, we can say that there has been genuine progress. I mean who wants to defend slavery in this day and age?

    No one wants to see blacks as slaves again.

    BUT, the Contemformism on race issues disallows and bans too many valuable ideas of past ‘racists’ that are still valid.

    PC would have us believe that all those ‘white segregationists’ were entirely wrong and have been totally discredited and blah blah blah. Now, it is true enough that many segregationists were small-minded and wrong on lots of stuff.

    But they had some genuinely valid concerns about blacks. It is objectively true that blacks are more muscular, more aggressive, and pose a threat to the well-being of the white race, especially to the pride of white males since black males kick white male butt and take white women who lose respect for white males. No wonder so many poor white guys are using drugs and killing themselves. They lost their manhood.

    So, even as we agree that slavery was wrong and Jim Crow was socially discriminatory, we can also validate certain Segregationist fears cuz end of Segregation meant blacks running wild and beating up weaker whites. And just look at the anti-white hellishness in South Africa. One can make a valid case that Apartheid was unfair and unjust, but one could also make a valid case that simply ending the system was unfair and unjust to whites since they would be vastly outnumbered by a populace that is dumber, more aggressive, more thuggish, and more muscled.

    If Palestinians were liberated from Zionist oppression and then went on to murder and rape so many Jews, would the US media just shrug their shoulders?

    And consider the issue of women and intelligence when Lawrence Summers surmised that it may be that there are more men in science and math cuz there are more high IQ men at tail ends of IQ. Such could be true or not, but it’s an interesting idea. It’s an idea that was held by many men in the past, and it was not discredited though not decisively proven either. So, we can debate and have further research.

    But Contemporary Conformism kicked into gear and the ONLY ACCEPTABLE truth was the current and ‘most evolved’ feminist dogma that said it is IMPOSSIBLE that men could, at tail ends, be smarter than women.

    Contemformism has this idea that the latest ideas and theories — those enforced by the Ruling Elites — must be absolutely superior to ones in the past that have been ‘discredited’ and are no longer even worthy of our consideration.

    Now, in hard sciences, certain ideas have been discredited for good.

    Who believes that the universe is filled with ether anymore?

    But in social sciences, few ideas have been TOTALLY discredited. Some have been partially discredited. Some have been challenged but not disproven.

    For example, while some past racial theories have decisively been discredited, others have been only partially discredited, and, if anything, certain theories seem to have been true or at least truer than the PC nonsense that says ‘race is just a social construct’. If anything, facts have disproven PC’s notions on race.

    But contemformism insists only the current PC Dogma is true, and there is nothing more to say. And if you say it like James Watson or Jason Richwine, then you will be destroyed and blacklisted, and that’s that.

  11. Califarewell

    There was a song by Paul McCartney.

    Give Ireland back to the Irish.

    We should come up with a slogan: Give California back to the Mexicans.

    What we need is a petition to rejoin California to Mexico.

    I think we should go for it.

    GOP should like it since Dems will lose all those electoral votes of Ca that will now be part of Mexico.

    And ‘progressives’ should love it since California will no longer be stolen from Mexico by gringos. It will be part of Mexico again.

    Also, Ca is a ‘progressive’ state that bitches about ‘white privilege’ and etc.

    Well, if Ca is part of Mexico, it will be ruled by wonderful Mexicans, not by evil gringos.

    And since Ca is part of Mexico, Mexicans could go there without legal problems of any kind.

    As for yellows and blacks who bitch about White Rule, they will no longer have to worry since they’ll live under benign brown rule.

    So, we need a proposition to rejoin Ca with Mexico.

  12. Hearing that the claims of him shouting “Britain First!’ are false, fabricated by a Paki “witness” and contradicted by others.

    • It doesn’t matter whether he said it or not. The media has already set the narrative; the truth of the situation is of little importance.

      • That’s a defeatest attitude. Of course the media will lie and set a false narrative. Always been the case. Our job is counter propaganda and information. The internet has made us, when in enough numbers, rivals of the MSM.

        • That is a realistic assessment having nothing to do with defeatism. The vast majority of people don’t analyze these events as we do. Rather they hear or read what the media is pushing, absorb that one bit of information and move on about their day; this is the reason the “drive by media” has been so effective.

  13. Andrew Anglin predictably toes the ziomedia line with his interpretation of an obvious false flag here, but reports the bottom line, which is that the jews are out to get not just the english nationalists with this latest theater (Cox was probably killed but in a black op, not by some fringe ‘selfradicalizedmentallyilllonewhitewolf’) but William Pierce and the american anti-jew nationalist front:

    • And for those who don’t know, JEWS AREN’T SEMITES, and have never been so!

      “The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees.” – Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1948, Vol. 8, pg. 474.

      “The Talmud is, then, the written form of that which in the time of Jesus, was called the Traditions of the Elders.” – Rabbi Michael L. Rodkinson

      “You are apparently a Semite. And you know very well that the Russian Jews – the Ashkenazim – who control Israel and the United States are not Semitic. But you and all Arabs, who should know better, allow the weaponization of the Jewish term, ‘anti-Semitism.’ ”

      “It was the Protestant Reformation with its revival of the Hebrew Bible that would link the modern Jews of Europe to the ancient Hebrews of Palestine, a link that the philologists of the 18th century would solidify through their discovery of the family of “Semitic” languages, including Hebrew and Arabic.”- 1

      The last of the Semites

      It is Israel’s claims that it represents and speaks for all Jews that are the most anti-Semitic claims of all.

      “Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a “Jew” or to call a contemporary Jew and “Israelite” or a “Hebrew.”

      – Jewish Almanac, 1980, p.3

      “Here’s a paradox, a paradox, a most ingenious paradox; an anthropological facts; many [Caucasian] Christians…. have much more Hebrew-Israelite blood in their veins than most of the their Jewish neighbors.”

      – Dr. Alfred M Lilienthal, Jr.(Himself a Jew) What Price Israel, 1953, p.223.

      In his book What Price Israel, Jewish author Alfred M. Lilienthal testified that the term “Jew” is not automatically synonymous with the term “Israelite.” His statements leave no doubt that there is a general misunderstanding and misapplication of the word “Jew(s)”:

      “The Jewish racial myth flows from the fact that the words Hebrew, Israelite, Jew, Judaism, and the Jewish people have been used synonymously to suggest a historic continuity. But this is a misuse. These words refer to different periods in history. Hebrew is a term correctly applied to the period from the beginning of Biblical history to the settling in Canaan. Israelite refers correctly to the members of the twelve tribes of Israel.* The Yehudi or Jew is used in the Old Testament to designate members of the tribe of Judah, descendants of the fourth son of Jacob, as well as to denote citizens of the Kingdom of Judah, particularly at the time of Jeremiah and under the Persian occupation. Centuries later, the same word came to be applied to anyone, no matter of what origin, whose religion was Judaism.” 15

      – From Ted Weiland’s book, ‘The Mystery of the Gentiles,”

      FWIW, I put that statement out as soon as I could. I don’t think DS necessarily believed it, until I made my comment. IMHO, of course.

      • Jews are Semites. All the latest genetic research done on Arab, Jewish, and other Semitic population groups show they’re related. This idea that the modern day Jew is not Semitic or actually Edomites, or Khazars can’t by proven by history, archaeology, or genetics. Even David Duke doesn’t believe in the Khazar origin myth of the Ashkenazi Jews anymore, because he was honest enough to review the actual scientific data and realize the falsity of the idea. Promoting fazlsehoods like this can only hurt us in the long run, for educated people who might be drawn to our movement will be repelled by the pseudo science in this idea.

        • Oh, Dalton, you ass. YOU have been kicked out of numerous fora, for your blasphemy, your intransigence, and your utter stupidity. Take your meds, and go to a Novus Ordo mass.

          • Deal with the facts I brought up, instead of launching an ad hominem attack, or the more enlightened people here might start believing you’re a ignorant blowhard hiding behind a clerical collar.

          • The ‘enlightened people’ already know you are a marrano, a crypto-Jew, who USES his supposed “Christianity” to inflame, demean, and demonize all those whom you cannot sway to your perverted worldview. You’ve already been warned more than twice, Sir. Are you like the addict, who must needs be given more and more, merely to slake your irrational and satanic thirst?

        • Using David Duke as a reference source, does not impress me. Nobel Prize-winning jewish Authors, jewish encyclopedias, and the work of a Geneticist like Elhaik, DOES. Jews are not Biblical Semites, nor have they been Biblical Israelites for some centuries) and that YOU are a Jew genetically, is a damning indictment against you, or haven’t you gotten that through your skull, yet?

          • Go to Dave Duke’s article on his site about the Khazar origin theory. It is very well documented with links to articles by genetic researchers who have tested thosands of subjects over a space of many years. All of those tests show the YDNA and the MTDNA in all subjects relates to other Semitc groups like the Arabs, Syrians, Assyrians, or Chaldeans, not Turkish or Mongolian, as the Khazar hypothesis would hold. Also, I’ve read several books by known and respected genetic researchers and all of the tests they have done confirm that the modern day Jews are Semites. And those who have examined Elhaik’s work have pointed out the flaws in his research. So, go and read Duke’s article, so you may become better informed.

          • Dalton- I’ve read it. It still does NOT prove that the Israelites of AD 70, are the ‘Israelites’ of 21st Century Palestine.Until and unless we get DNA on Jesus Christ, St. Peter, St. John, etc. it doesn’t ‘prove’ ANYTHING!

            How many times do I have to say that? The Ay-rabs came in sometime well before the Moslem creed began, but the whole concept of “DIASPORA” meant that ‘no stone was left unturned’ in God’s wrath in dispersing the ADAMIC {true} Israelites from Judea, after the Temple was destroyed. The Romans obliterated the ‘natives’ of the Hebrew Faith, and OTHERS TOOK THEIR LAND… because Jerusalem is ‘from above’ not the corrupt capital of a godless race, today.

          • Your refusal to accept valid scientific evidence doesn’t surprise me. The Romans didn’t obliterate all the Jews. Real history, as opposed to your fantastic revisionism, shows there were plenty of Jews scattered around the world in the 1st Century AD. There were also many survivors of the 70 AD tragedy, who were mostly sold into slavery. And yes other took their land, but that doesn’t prove anything other than foreigners moved into the land. You have basically accepted the kooky Christian Identity ideas about Jews, and it has distorted your understanding of Biblical history as it relates to Jews. No real scholar of Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant, Jewish, or secular background would accept this hogwash as true. This is why I don’t believe you’re a genuine Orthodox priest. No Orthodox communion would accept your viewpoint on Cl or Jews as correct. You’re a “priest” in vagrant communion, that has no ties to the established synods. I could go on, but I prefer to end my comments here, for there’s no reason for me to discuss things with somebody who is self-willed and refuses to Liston to the truth.

          • Scientific ‘evidence’ (as in all endeavors with sinful men) CAN BE MANIPULATED. I quoted Dr. Elhaik. There’s ‘scientific evidence’ but it’s the sort YOUR GUILTY CONSCIENCE DOES NOT WANT TO ACCEPT. Still trying to pretend you are both ‘chosenite’ and ‘Chosen’, I see. Once a jew, always a Jew.

          • Dr. Elkaik’s critics show he has manipulated the evidence. You wish to use him as a source because he fits into your confirmation bias about Jews. I have no “guilty conscience” about this matter because I have traditional Christian beliefs, real history, and real science, instead of the silly Christian Identity myths you have embraced. I’m not going to bother discussing this with you anymore, because your inability to deal with criticism, and your hostility toward anyone who questions you makes it impossible to reason with you.

          • You raise that canard so often, and I have batted it back down so often, you’d think you’d learn by now. But no. The unregenerate mind CANNOT understand the things of the spirit, says St. Paul. You claim an affinity to the Traditional Christian beliefs, yet you REMAIN IN A HERETICAL CULT?
            Puh-leez. Rome is no true Church, and hasn’t been for at least a half-century, but, (as teh Orthodox more honestly say) it hasn’t been Christian for over a thousand years.

  14. If the Brits are going to be thrown off by what is no more than a bit of random noise, this vote is meaningless. In any event, even if the ”Leave” side wins the initiative will be gutted behind the scenes.

    On the other hand, the Establishment thinks that, somehow, if it wins, it will be smooth sailing. However, the U.K. and the E.U. will continue to degrade and fall apart. The economic die is cast everywhere in the West.

    Just like the U.S. presidential election, all this is no more than a venue for us to advance our agenda. Ultimately, it will come down to the gun, but we are not there yet, far from it. As far as I can tell, there is no significant organized resistance of any kind, even in the South.

    • Before any shooting war, you have to create and display organizational strength. Elections and referenfums are good for that, as are charity drives, boycotts, etc.

      In theory the war is between the 60% of men who support Trump and the 40% of men who dont. That would be a lopsided batlle were it ever to occur. But before that happens people have to get mental clarity.

      We have forgotten how to lead and forgotten how to follow.

  15. The MSM will not provide the answer to the critical question regarding the “Mutiny at the State Department” How many of the diplomats are jewish?

    The “dissent channel cable” was signed by 51 State Department officers involved with advising on Syria policy in various capacities, according to an official familiar with the document. The Wall Street Journal reviewed a copy of the cable, which repeatedly calls for “targeted military strikes” against the Syrian government in light of the near-collapse of the ceasefire brokered earlier this year.

    The views expressed by the U.S. officials in the cable amount to a scalding internal critique of a longstanding U.S. policy against taking sides in the Syrian war, a policy that has survived even though the regime of President Bashar al-Assad has been repeatedly accused of violating ceasefire agreements and Russian-backed forces have attacked U.S.-trained rebels.

    “It’s embarrassing for the administration to have so many rank-and-file members break on Syria,” said a former State Department official who worked on Middle East policy. These officials said dissent on Syria policy has been almost a constant since civil war broke out there in 2011. But much of the debate was contained to the top levels of the Obama administration. The recent letter marked a move by the heart of the bureaucracy, which is largely apolitical, to break from the White House.

  16. This was a false flag op for the Jewish Overlords and the Moslem Jihadis, to PREVENT the BREXIT. Jo Cox was merely a bit of liberal ‘collateral damage,’ as they say.

    Don’t think this idea absurd. Timing (to Jews and Masons) is everything,

  17. Interesting how they always have a whole army of unhinged people ready to kill anyone they want killed.

    Not just now, all through the history of Europe and the US. Dozens of European statesmen, royalties and US presidents killed through the decades by ‘lone madmen’ — always at the most convenient time.

    The only fault of Jo Cox was that she was a photogenic young lady with a nice, clean picture-perfect family, and a Remain supporter. A good enough victim to swing votes. For that she had to be the sacrificial lamb.

    They are getting desperate, aren’t they? But then again, the same tactics in Sweden with the assassination of Anna Lindh didn’t change the outcome of the vote… So it’s yet another innocent life sacrificed to satisfy the monsters of the Establishment.

  18. A mentally ill neo-Nazi did everything possible to destroy British Sovereignty and ensure that Britian remains part of the EUSSR.

    You people need to learn to police your ranks. Neo-Nazis are the useful idiots of cultural marxists, and the mentally ill ones may as well be their agents.

  19. Sad but true.

    Give credit where’s it’s due. Muslim men have balls and will not surrender to Zionist Wall-Street-Hollywood-Las-Vegas-funded globalist POO-RIDE Degeneracy.

    In contrast, Western men have done NOTHING but surrender being brainwashed by Jews & Homos and allowing their cities(and even churches) to be turned into Sodom & Gomorrahs that celebrate fecal penetration of homo men and genital mutilation of trannies.

    Go Turks!!!! Proud Turks will NOT allow their sacred fatherland be defiled by Zionist-Homo-promoted neo-imperialist degeneracy.

    The homo flag is the New Flag of Western Imperialism.

  20. Oh, schlomo is this the best you can do? Sad little small dicked loser.
    Brexit is going up not down. Smart money is the English guy was fingered by Muzzies who did it. All the witnesses say this guy was non-violent.
    Hunter you’re sounding like Chester Cheetah Beck. Are you trying to cuck us? Violence always works boy. The polecats with tin badges only work for paychecks. At home, they’re just half-pint half-wits. You have to see them at home when they put the shotguns and cars with sirens away. They are much more amenable to reason then.
    Brexit will cause the Nationalism to fire up red hot. 10% of Germans want another Hitler. Schlomo has pooped his wittle pants again. That Stasi Whore is probably taking tranquilizers. Her pimps do not like failures. She’ll probably end up suicided.

Comments are closed.