National Polls
LA Times – Trump +3.8
People’s Pundit Daily – Hillary +0.4
PPP – Hillary +4 (2-way), Hillary +4 (4-way)
Trump UP 1 Point
Rasmussen – Hillary +1 (4-way)
Hillary UP 6 Points
State Polls
New Hampshire – End Citizens United – Hillary +6 (2-way and 4-way)
Trump UP 4 points
South Carolina – Winthrop – Trump +4 (3-way)
Florida – PPP – Hillary +3 (2-way), Hillary +2 (4-way)
North Carolina – PPP – Hillary +4 (2-way), Hillary +2 (4-way)
Virginia – PPP – Hillary +6 (2-way), Hillary +6 (4-way)
Pennsylvania – PPP – Hillary +5 (2-way), Hillary +6 (4-way)
Colorado – PPP – Hillary +7 (2-way), Hillary +6 (4-way)
British betting odds are Clinton 2/5 Trump 2/1
I wouldn’t take them too seriously. Especially after how they blew BREXIT which was further behind than Trump is now.
The numbers just dont add up Hunter. Every single poll has Hillary either at or other the Margin of error and factoring all the Voter Fraud in my opinion we are pissing into the wind. We had best PRAY FOR TRUMP but with the other hand look past 11/8 to the Revolution of 11/9 that is a foregone conclusion. How when and why it begins I am clueless but it will begin first like a trickle then like a rain storm then a gully washer then a flood.
We must dedicate ourselves to making President Hillary’s Tenure HELL ON EARTH.
Another good way to measure it is the cash donations, Clinton has 373 million compared to Trump 165 million. The big banks and Wall st. are backing Clinton.
Hillary probably has a trillion dollar slush fund for operatives thats not even on the books. Rothschilds bankrolling it
We must dedicate ourselves to making President Hillary’s Tenure HELL ON EARTH.
Oh, don’t worry. If she wins, it will be.
This is off topic, but I wanted to say I enjoyed watching you give your talk the other day at LS in AR, saw it on YouTube. I think you made a very good point and I can sum it up nice and neat for you. Here it goes – If Clinton gets elected the damage would far exceed the value of anything gained. I can’t argue against it, you spelled it all out plain and simple.
Thanks!
I will put up the video soon.
Hillary is getting a nice bounce. It will be superseded by whatever happens in the next debate, which will be superseded by the result of the third debate, and then the polls will settle.
PPP has some interesting internals.
1.) Even after the debate, Trump has around 90% of Republicans, but Hillary only has 85% of Democrats.
2.) Hillary is only getting 81% of the black vote (!!!) In Florida, Obama barely edged Romney by getting 95% of the black vote and an enormous turnout in 2012.
3.) Trump is losing because of independents. Presumably, Hillary’s bounce is due to independents reacting to the debate. I will look at the other polls and see if this is a pattern.
If the people of the USA elect Hillary we really have no choice but to obstruct her at every turn, make her illegitimate reign so bad that she wishes to quit in disgust.
If that happens we need to give up on America and think in terms of red states secession and alternative nationalism.
Conner I am already there, been there awhile now
I’m already there, but unlike lots of people, I see this election as part of the process.
We agree Hunter, its not HOW we get there, its GETTING THERE that counts. By the way when will the day comes when we can see this in Montgomery AL? Hopefully soon.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/003fee5c4f5a273f41bf12749dd55bc9d0ec19b26df2ec3928bc54ca41a17290.jpg
Rasmussen internals:
Trump and Hillary are both getting 79% of Republicans and Democrats respectively. Trump is up 12% with independents. He is losing by 1 point.
Its all about Dem base turnout, single women, blacks, Mexicans. Hopefully they will forget there is an election, part of that is Trump keeping his nose clean.
By the poll numbers the debate was a minus one point for Trump. Did Hillary appear sick? No. Did Trump appear prepared? no.
No one in my circles has talked about the debate at all. No one cares.
Most people who know their issues are set already.
Trump doesn’t appear to understand that specific policy critiques are not the same as personal attacks as well. So he let that bitch off the hook for those 30 years of Throne Sniffing.
Hunter this scares me. Are people really THIS STUPID? If you aka John Q Public couldn’t see Hillary Clinton was lying her A%$ off in the debate and you still wish to vote for her, OMG just end it will ya? Yes just what we need, Trans Pacific Partnership and more refugees. Makes no sense.
Nowt Stranger Than Folk.
I suspect Trump threw it.
It’s obvious that he felt it necessary to qualify himself to the nigger and the cunt. Almost sniveling beta behaviour. He knows not to do that if he wants to keep frame.
I have no idea what happens next. Maybe God will take care of Hillary for us, one way or another
Yes.
It is just a typical debate bounce. The convention bounce was even bigger. It will fade.
I will tell you this HW either way, when 11/9 gets here the trouble begins. We will not allow another swindle or an attack on our blood and honor to go unnoticed. Though our numbers are small, it only took 300 Spartans we can do the same
I’m more pessimistic. He came across like a lazy schoolboy who thinks being glib is enough.
There were so many things he could have raised about her professionalism or lack of it in that debate. Now he’s the one looking like a casual slacker.
He has two more chances. He can’t blow it.
Yes…. the ‘sheeople’ ARE that stupid. That’s why we gave the vote to women and niggers- emotions and ‘gibsmedat’ over thinking, any day….
Yes fools all of them. I still have to believe that Christendom will survive this onslaught. God Almighty will not allow his Son’s Christians (TRUE ISRAEL) to be eliminated by Ishmael, Amalek, Jews (EDOMITES) and the basket of degenerates. We will win but the problem is we have to live till then
Real women were never interested in being allowed to vote, it was only militant lesbians like Susan B.Anthony and her boyfriend Elizabeth Cady Stanton who pushed for it, along with the abolitionist (and suspected homo) William Lloyd Garrison.
Those in the Pit of Degenerates outnumber those in the basket of deplorables.
Yes by quite alot
I troll a TV show on Twitter. A&E’s “Married at First Sight”. The “experiment” where-in (((experts))) pick mates for people, using “scientific methods” which are never delineated. The concept is that the couples are married the first time they meet, at the alter. I watched the first series out of curiosity. 2 White couples and one Black. The White couples are still together. The Black one split up.
The next 2 series were all about Miscegenation. The Hebe experts “matched” an NYC Indian woman w/ a NJ White man, who is apparently a homo. They matched a Puerto Rican Catholic girl (who I wound up feeling really sorry for, since the vile Jew berated and insulted her all the time, and threatened to kill her family. She had to get a restraining order ) with a REALLY nasty NY Jew. And a nice Italian NJ man w/ a Puerto Rican from NYC, with obviously strong Negro genetics. None of the couples stayed together that year, or the following year, when a very lively big blonde Celtic man was paired with a tiny dour Italian woman (who stated, after her wedding ceremony, that she expected a Dark man. I knew it was doomed), a rather decent, droll Indian fellow, with a really CRAZY Jewess, and a mulatto male w/ a Negress. His female relatives commented, when the bride walked out, to be married, “Thank God she’s Black!” I laughed at that……….so far, 9 couples, 2 successes.
Three of the old (((experts))) fled the show, ostensibly to save their reputations. 1 remained. A really obnoxious Negro male “pastor” was brought on, and a female sexpert/relationship “counselor”. The matches are an Italian Man/Lateena Orc (with a mouth like a pirhana and a body like a barrel), a very introverted White man, who may be gay, and a needy, crybaby Lateena, and 2 Jews. The couples are supposed to stay together for 6 weeks, and try to make a success. They are sent on honeymoons, and the Jewess esstentially bailed on the IDIOTIC Jew male in approx. 2 days.
The reason I am relaying all this is I’ve been trolling the show’s Twitter feed, in order to point out how inept and fraudulent the Jew grifter “experts” are. A few folks began to think about what they are watching I kept stating that the show is not about mates; it’s all about social engineering. Most of the fans do not get it, though, resent me, and the few have figured out I’m a Racist Nazi. They do believe EVERYTHING the TV tells ’em, and WANT to.
Denise you seen the Moon Man videos? OMG I cant stop its addictive
Don’t be trying to take i, thegreennazi’s, main squeeze DenisetheCelt to any videos!
Moon Man is so hilarious though its on Youtube. You haven’t seen it Green?
I had no idea Moonman was so racially aware. So is Steve Crowder. I thought he was just another no-talent douche.
//uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7e5ea2719c5f460775850c42ec4f2a70bde9897c920238cb336e9d541a597d3e.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1b8333d707e0178dcda340bae02474f1ff7a304c88ccbc4f370e61543ba82a6d.png https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0d3a9778bd26bf28be486dc47e7e25114ac8ee0ea55e8be4262cdd61964a888f.jpg
I know. They are wonderful!
I watched that show once or twice and have come to the conclusion that all those sorry-ass contestants would be better off remaining single.
Correct. They just wanted to appear on Talmudvision. They were sold a bill of cheap goods, though.
Ppp is a democratic polling firm. They’re usually slanted to democrats up until the week before the election.
As we should expect. So many of the polls during the campaign are used as political weapons to drive public opinion. Close to the end of the campaign their future reputation (and $) depends on an accurate prediction.
It’s Tracy Flick v Animal
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tracy_Flick
Hillary has the edge among people who aren’t voting in the election:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-hillary-clinton-has-the-edge-among-people-planning-to-skip-election/
The more the better.
Hillary has the edge among people who aren’t THINKING in the election:
There…. Fixed it for you.
Millennials are less engaged in this election than any in the past 1y years:
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/09/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-millennials-third-party.html?_r=0&referer=
Giving 18 year olds the “right” to vote was a mistake, it was an amendment passed in 1971 during all the controversy surrounding the Vietnam War and the Draft. It may have seemed like the right thing to do at the time in light of events but now it seems absurd, at least to me.
Yes, it was a terrible decision.
It should have also lead to the lowering of the drinking age too. That would have weeded out the exceedingly stupid and self indulgent from the voting pool and the gene pool.
I think it was, in fact, accompanied by a lowering of the drinking age …
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/790182b1dd4a8eddd09699fc5ebdc0ce002dccf2daa3e08a9e16f13bf9e710b2.jpg
Did not know that. Which states I wonder? Wasn’t California.
Hawaii
From the screen-cap below, you can see that the article at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._history_of_alcohol_minimum_purchase_age_by_state treats the subject state-by-state. As it happens, the transition, including the passage of the 26th Amendment, re voting age, coincided roughly with my college years (1971-75). Not really being a drinker myself, I gave the change little attention, but I did have an impression that the Friday and Saturday nights of young Philadelphians came to involve drives across the Delaware River, to dance clubs in New Jersey. That state, as you see in the graphic, was among those that lowered the purchase-age to eighteen.
Probably, those drives to–or back from–New Jersey involved many traffic accidents of the kind that led to the 1984 federal law that, as you saw in my previous comment, pressured the states to return to a purchase-age of twenty-one. Yes, California, as you say, looks to have stuck with twenty-one, as did Pennsylvania. In Pennsylvania, sale of alcohol–except for beer, I guess–is a state monopoly, conducted in what are colloquially known as “state stores.” When I would hear, in, say, a crime movie, of the robbery of a “liquor store,” I had no idea what was meant.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/feed84d88eaa30a55e4767718d0d1d039011ad009ddd1a6fad2e1ed88262fcea.jpg
They should have just made an exception for servicemen.
The black vote isn’t there. Michelle Obama is desperately trying to increase Hillary’s margin in Florida and Philly:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-florida-black-voters-228822
The run of the mill buck nigger won’t vote for a White woman. Hillary will get the old black church lady vote though.
If Miss Hill’ry wanted the black vote so badly she should have selected a colored running mate like Rep. John Lewis of Georgia. But since she’s a typical left-wing hypocrite she chose the creepy, effeminate Tim Kaine instead.
She is polling 81% of blacks after her debate victory.
Which is terrible. She should have about 93 percent, minimum.
That doesn’t mean all of the niggers will actually vote. The church ladies will; the ghetto street trash variety, which comprise the vast majority probably won’t.
I think you and contributors like Richard Spencer (history oriented) might appreciate this.
http://wws.princeton.edu/news-and-events/news/item/politics-polls-13-alt-right
SMH
(((Furman))) ?@FurmJo
In case there was any doubt
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CtfwNcBWcAAQkDp.jpg
Partial comment of mine from July 23 Occidental Dissent entry headed “Hillary Clinton Picks Tim Kaine As Vice President” …
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/00a8f3abf36b1554e4feefa9af8af84667994e7ebb3dbadfef3db8fda86e3e06.jpg
Paradoxically, his poor reputation as an intellect and debater made such a move impossible. It would have been seen as fear.
Had he been preparing since May (at least), he might have actually won instead of had a loss on points.
The best we can hope for is no gaffes in the next 6 weeks.
Certainly, he would have been charged with fear, Afterthought, but he might have been able to finesse it. If you’re faced with a charge like that, you don’t resist it. You say, “Well, yes, I can see that some persons might think this choice of mine is based on fear, and of course they’re free to say so as often and as long as they’d like. In this campaign, my intent is to avoid communication modes in which I think I can’t be effective. I choose not to debate.” No matter how many times you’re called on it, you don’t waver.
What struck me–and not me only–about Monday night’s mess was that it was thoroughly unsurprising. So sure was the Clinton camp that Trump would demonstrate his much-remarked-upon inability to avoid taking bait that, as a friend of mine said to me last night, they made no secret, before the debate, of their plan to needle him. If Trump had simply internalized a simple instruction–“Avoid taking the bait”–he would have completed ninety percent of his necessary preparation for the event.
It will be decided on election day: enough people may not want America to die.
Last night, my friend I mentioned said, in effect, the same thing: maybe, in this unusual election, something unusual will happen on election day.
FiveThirtyEight polls-only forecast, on debate day (September 26) and this evening (September 29) …
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e281b4d9fd07270ad0250ea162bfe62f5a65eb27edb9e774b82b4298b15126ac.jpg
Ricky Vaughn Retweeted
Paul Joseph Watson ?@PrisonPlanet Sep 28
And which issue is the media obsessing about…..?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cte0f9_W8AATVWp.jpg
IMO, Donald Trump still has a great chance of winning. There is no way she wins the popular vote based on the lack of enthusiasm by her base as opposed to the continuing enthusiasm the vast majority of Trump supporters have for him. The best legitimate win TPTB can give Clinton is a narrow and I mean razor’s edge thing electoral majority while allowing the popular vote to stay as is.
For all you gentlemen griping about the so-called “Womyn Vote,” and already sounding taps on the possibility of Donald Trump winning the White House, Check. This. Out.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/02/hillary-clinton-2016-woman-problem-213621
82 percent of White women millennials supported Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton in the Democrat Primary.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/poll-hillary-clinton-white-women-support-declining-120982
“In July, 34 percent of white women held a favorable view of Clinton,
while 53 percent held an unfavorable view. Those numbers were down from
June, when 44 percent of white women held a favorable view of Clinton
and 43 percent an unfavorable view.”
“Women are a crucial target demographic for Clinton, who hopes women
eager to witness the first female president will support her as
enthusiastically as African-Americans supported President Obama in 2008
and 2012. Obama built momentum among women in the last two election
cycles: in 2012, women overall supported Obama over Romney by 12
percentage points, while Romney won men by 8 percentage points,
according to Gallup Polling. But among white women, the picture was not
as rosy for Democrats in 2012, as Romney won that demographic by 14
points..”
Married White women, particularly those with children, i.e. “skin in the game” voted for Romney. Trump offers enough of a change from status quo compared to the Bain Vulture Capitalist, Romney, that women without children will look at him more favorably. And I seriously doubt that female Bernie supporters are going to break all speed to vote for the woman they feel stole the election for their guy.
I would predict that more male Bernie supporters vote for Hillary than female Bernie supporters. Men tend to compromise. Women bear grudges. Men tend to go easier on women. Women are infinitely harder on other women than men are. That’s why any lawyer defending a rapist is going to pack that jury with women. Men will see the victim and all their chivalrous instincts will come to fore making them want to protect her by all but stringing the defendant up. Women will look at the woman more critically find out how she lived her life, what she did to provoke the attack, what she was wearing. You guys just don’t know.
Hillary is not going to be defeated by Trump’s genius (as clearly, he’s not). Hillary is going to be defeated by Hillary. Every time some idiot teenager wins his Darwin Award by fighting with the cops and sets off more violent BLM eruptions, women are going to look at Hillary and see never-ending rioting and knock out games and think of their sons being chased down by mobs. Every time, there is act of Muslim terror or rape, women are going to look at Hillary and remember how she wants to be the American Angela Merkel, they are going to think of their daughters being groomed, groped, and gang-raped.
All this nonsense about this Monolithic “Womyn Vote” is, was, and
always will be smoke blown up your noses to blind you and demoralize you
and depress you from voting. As long as you refuse to believe that
your wives, mothers, and sisters have interests in common with you, you
cannot win this struggle. Ignore what the lying press is telling you
and get out the vote.
Crooked Hillary!
Watch video.
Bill MitchellVerified account
?@mitchellvii
And here is the video of a man removing that projector from Hillary’s podium. Begin at 5:40 mark.
https://youtu.be/JsriYyuigVo