Hillary’s Exploding Scandals

Consider the following:

Donna Brazile is out at CNN after getting caught leaking a second debate question to Hillary in the Democratic primary:

“Donna Brazile, then a CNN commentator, leaked a debate question to the Hillary Clinton campaign ahead of the Democratic candidate’s primary debate with Bernie Sanders earlier this year.”

Rigged much?

Sen. Harry Reid is threatening FBI Director James Comey with charges of violating the Hatch Act for reopening the email investigation:

“Washington (CNN)Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid said on Sunday that FBI Director James Comey may have violated the Hatch Act, barring political activity by federal employees, through a late election season letter to Congress about the scope of the bureau’s probe of Hillary Clinton’s private email service as secretary of state. …”

Flex that muscle to intimidate the FBI into backing off from investigating Hillary’s corruption. How about those optics!

DOJ political hacks blocked the FBI’s investigation into Hillary’s corruption:

“According to reporting from The Wall Street Journal, the Clinton Foundation was under investigation earlier this year by the FBI, but that investigation was stymied and may have been shut down completely by the Justice Department. …”

Wow, rigged much?

The FBI has four separate ongoing criminal investigations involving Hillary:

Lots of smoke there! Is there a fire?

Eric “My People” Holder weighs in and condemns FBI Director James Comey:

“Former Attorney General Eric Holder has written a scathing op-ed condemning FBI Director James Comey for his handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.

“I fear he has unintentionally and negatively affected public trust in both the Justice Department and the FBI,” Holder wrote in an op-ed in The Washington Post published late Sunday. “And he has allowed — again without improper motive — misinformation to be spread by partisans with less pure intentions.” …”

Another DOJ political loyalist tries to throw Hillary a life preserver.


“Weiner — the name became almost a curse word among senior Democrats over the past two days, as the disgraced congressman unexpectedly surfaced in the final stretch of the presidential contest. The news resurrected memories of previous Weiner scandals. ….

“They knew he was a narcissist who was massively flawed,” Mr. Hyers said. “And now we’re all still stuck with him.”

Among Democrats who shunned Mr. Weiner from the start, there was little joy at the apparent vindication of their judgment. Sarah Kovner, a major Democratic donor, said there was less concern that Weiner-inflicted injuries might cost Mrs. Clinton the election, than sheer frustration that a known bad seed had created such endless tumult. …”

Carlos Danger has ruined it. Hillary was going to coast to victory in the final week of the campaign. She might still win, but she isn’t going to coast to victory.

Note: Watch this space. There will probably be more by the end of the day.

About Hunter Wallace 12380 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent


  1. Kovner is NOT upset by Hillary’s massive corruption, her lying, her massive thievery, all the murders that surround Hillary, all the mobster connections Hillary has, all the donation money Hillary took from mobsters and dictators and enemies to the United States from all around the world, her stealing billions of dollars meant to go to rebuild Haiti, her stealing of 6 billion dollars from the State Department, her bankrolling and arming and giving important military logistical info to Islamic Jihadists, her warmingering, all her lies in getting wars started, her deep deceptiveness, her using an open server as Secretary of State, whereby every Intelligence agency in the world could read all the emails Obama and everyone else sent to Hillary and could read every email Hillary sent to everyone while Hillary was typing the emails. Hillary knew it too and that’s what she wanted, for all the enemies of the United States to know what she was doing.

    Kovner is not upset Hillary’s closest advisor , Huma Abedin, comes from an Islamic Jihadist family in the Middle East and Huma herself is a die-hard Muslim Supremacist who wants Islamic Jihad in the United States. Her Abedin family helps bankroll and arm , give weapons and guns to, the Islamic Jihadist Muslim Brotherhood in the United States.

    Hillary of course knows ALL about Abedin’s family, and has known about Huma’s family from the first day Hillary hired Huma on. That’s why Hillary wanted Huma, EXACTLY because Huma’s Middle Eastern family is deeply connected to Islamic Jiahdists, Huma’s family helps finance Islamic Jihad, helps supply Islamic Jihadists with weapons and guns. Kovner is not upset at Hillary’s massive treason against the United States, against us Americans. Kovner is just upset Weiner ruined it for Hellary. As per Kovner, Hillary didn’t ruin it for herself by being so intensely corrupt and so deeply treasonous , NO, Weiner ruined it for Hellary, lol.

    • Huma Abedin is Pakistani filth. I could never understand how she wears men’s clothes, doesn’t cover her hair and yet she’s Muslim? Downright amazing the level of intellectual dishonesty at play. When are people going to understand Islam is a Political Organization as much as a Religion?

  2. Smears of the day ramping up. Did you know Trump is tied to the Russian mob and wants to destroy the world with nukes?

  3. Obongo, via his White House spokesman, Josh Earnest, just said that Comey is a man of integrity and principal, and that his recent actions were certainly NOT intended to influence the election. Repost it to demoralise and counter Hillbots.

    Don’t be complacent. Trump could be subjected to more slander. Don’t be surprised if some whore pops up just before the election to claim that Trump raped her as a child.

    Also: Clinton News Network just threw that gorilla Donna Brazile under the bus.

  4. Reid is bitching that Comey is deliberately sitting on evidence that Trump is a Putin hand maiden.

    Remember when we were the ones who were paranoid with our tin foil hat theories about the Russians?

  5. On TV now: Hillary Clinton just said that Trump wants (her patron) Saudi Arabia to have nuclear weapons, and said, “Can you imagine that? — Nuclear weapons smack-dab in the heart of the Middle East!” Oy vey!

      • Yes, but the main point should be The Kike’s nukes. Of course nobody in the kike media will question her about her sudden (fake) concern about nukes in the Middle East.

    • Hillary says that Trump wants to start a nuclear war with Russia and Trump is a Putin totey. Though she’s never made both of those accusations on one single day, she alternates them every other day. Because stating them both on the same day would come off as contradictory.

    • Wikileaks: Clinton, Kike Blumenthal, Joshua Fischer: Saudis have nukes:

      Hillary Clinton Email Archive

      February 17, 2010
      For: Hillary
      From: Sid
      Re: Iran, Saudi

      Had dinner last night (Tuesday, February 16) with Joschka Fischer. We had an interesting conversation on Iran and Saudi Arabia, among other things. (As you know Fischer is now director of the Nabucco pipeline project.) On Iran, harsh, targeted sanctions are absolutely necessary, but are most effective diplomatically when always coupled with an offer to negotiate. The iron fist in the velvet glove approach achieves several objectives: According to Fischer’s intelligence, Ahmanijehad wished some negotiated settlement but was blocked. The regime has splits at the top. Perhaps true, perhaps not. But constantly pushing negotiations alongside sanctions puts additional pressure on internal divisions, whatever they are. Extending an open hand while brandishing a stick closes diplomatic and political room to maneuver for Iran. Its refusal to accept the open hand justifies application of the stick. Even when sanctions are enforced it always remains useful to say another way is open. The damage done to Iran is therefore the result of its own choice. This approach also aids the opposition. A purely condign sanctions strategy can contribute to the regime’s will to punish and tighten repression. Talking of regime change, of course, undermines the cause of regime change. It is a gift to the regime. The opposition is a new factor in the Iran equation that must be taken into account on the political and moral level. Pushed to the wall, the regime may feel compelled to repress, which might involve thousands or tens of thousands of politica,killings. On Saudi Arabia, Fischer points out that if Iran develops nuclear weaponry the Saudis already have their own bomb. The Saudis invested in Pakistan’s nuclear weaponry partly for this eventuality; that’s their bomb in reserve.


  6. We had Watergate, we had Irangate, we had Monicagate. But none of these scandals exposed as much as Weinergate.

    • This time, it isn’t “Deep Throat” – its Anthony wagging his Weiner at Hitlery’s Rotten Clintoris.


    CNN accepts contributor Brazile’s resignation

    By Associated Press

    CNN says it is “completely uncomfortable” to learn through WikiLeaks that former commentator Donna Brazile had contacted the Clinton campaign ahead of time about a question that would be posed during a presidential primary town hall last March in Flint, Michigan.

    CNN announced Monday that it had accepted Brazile’s resignation as a contributor two weeks ago. Her deal had been suspended in July when she became interim head of the Democratic National Committee.

    The material released Monday from the hacked file of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta revealed at least the second time that Brazile had communicated to Clinton aides about questions Hillary Clinton might be asked on the air.

    CNN said it never gave Brazile access to any questions or preparation material in advance of a network event.

    • This one is truly sweet. Brazile is the quintessential self righteous fat black woman, on steroids. She makes me nauseous, literally.

  8. The election is only a bit over a week away, and we need to be prepared for either outcome.

    If Hillary wins, do not listen to the vantardists. The best thing we can do under those circumstances is continue building an alternative to the mainstream. Get on Twitter and:

    #1 Promote peaceful secession.

    #2 Rip the Republican Party apart. Point out that they stabbed Trump in the back.

    Our goal should be to ensure that, if the cucks succeed in taking down Trump, they are dragged down with him.

      • There are many reasons why we should publically espouse peaceful means. The biggest ones, IMO, are:

        1. Publically promoting violence is a great way to get arrested.

        2. The liberal system hates us immensely, so all we really need to do is promote secession and they will attack us. It’s much more effective to let them slit their own throats than for us to give them ammunition.

        3. Modern America does not offer productive ground for putsch-ist style movements. This nation is too large, diverse, and technologically advanced for a coup to easily succeed. A rogue military uprising would therefore likely be put down by the U.S. military (which already has protocols in place to do so).

        4. Most U.S. soldiers have grown up playing video games where they kill Nazis, watching movies where the bad guys are Nazis, etc. So many of them would love a chance to finally fight the enemy they’ve been raised to fight. I know U.S. soldiers (straight White males) who are run of the mill patriotards. They’d follow orders and put down an insurrection. The more violent rhetoric we use, the easier it is for the media to paint us as ‘evil Nazis.’

        5. Promoting violence draws in unhinged individuals. America’s pro-White movement already has enough nut jobs, eccentrics, and oddballs.

        I understand getting angry at the government, but promoting violence is not going to get us anywhere. It didn’t work for the paramilitary movement and it won’t work for us.

          • I think we might have accidentally ended up disagreeing over nothing.

            When you said ‘Why limit secession to only “peaceful secession”?’ in response to my first post, I thought that you were asking why we should promote peaceful secession on Twitter (what I was advocating in that post).

            I don’t think that actual secession would be completely peaceful, but I do think that we should avoid advocating violence (for several reasons).

            Take care comrade.

          • I believe that war will likely come to America, and that people should be willing and able to defend themselves, their liberty, and their heritage.
            By the way, I am not a coward. Unlike you, I actually post under my real first and last name and post a picture of myself. I am not afraid for people to know who I am.

        • Mr. President, no man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do, opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely, and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfil the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offence, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

          Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.

          I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided; and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years, to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves, and the House? Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with these war-like preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled, that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask, gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us; they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done, to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne. In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free² if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending²if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained, we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts is all that is left us!

          They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance, by lying supinely on our backs, and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. Three millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations; and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

          It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!

          — Patrick Henry, St. John’s Church, Richmond, Virginia, March 23, 1775.

        • Good points, ArthurVikstrom.
          The boys at Lexington green in 1775 did not start it; they waited for the enemy to openly move and grant them the undeniable moral high ground. Of course, they were armed ahead of time.
          And going all Tim McVeigh is certainly NOT the way to win the support of mainstream Americans. (Note: I do not condone McVeigh’s attack, which was likey part of an ATF sting operation anyway. See the move “A Noble Lie: Oklahoma City 1995).
          I do think that at some point, the out-of-control FedGov will openly and enmasse attack white American patriots. America is fading away.

      • Simple, you have the right to defend yourself against personal attack, the community has the right to defend itself against communal attack.

        Many thoughtless people arrogate to themselves the choice of the whole community, which they have no right to do. They must be told early and often not to do so.

        A shadow government duly elected will make the call, if needed.

  9. In 2012, we learned that a multicultural electorate could
    reelect a president with unemployment hovering around 10 percent and an economy
    at near recession levels. Obama won
    comfortably. In 2016, we will find out
    if a multicultural electorate will elect someone under criminal investigation
    by the FBI. If Hillary is elected, I
    think it’s safe to say that we are probably closer to third world status than
    most of us thought possible.

    • Saw Bill O’Reilly today, saying that if Clinton wins, then the Republican Party can regroup, renew, reblahblah, and make a big comeback in 2020. All just business as usual. What does he care anyway? He figures he’ll have a great life with his millions, and die before everything really goes to hell.

  10. Donald Trump’s problem is that he lives in his own tight little isolated bubble, he never much gets out of it. He just doesn’t get out into the real world enough. He doesn’t understand the plight and the struggles of regular ordinary work-a-day billionaires.

  11. Not one Demonrat has come forward asking Crooked to step down from the campaign, both for the good of the party and more importantly for the good of the country. That monster doesn’t care if she takes down everyone and everything around her, like the whirlpool caused by a sinking ship.

  12. Monday on CNN’s “At This Hour,” while discussing the FBI reopening the investigation into Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, Rep. Steve Cohen (D- TN) called on the FBI director James Comey to resign.


      • Times of Israel, Oct 27:

        “Steve Israel: Florida Jews more worried about Trump than Tehran. Highest ranking Jewish congressman, while campaigning for Clinton in battleground state, says GOP nominee’s antics have ‘eclipsed’ dismay over nuclear accord.”

  13. Notice how the Demonrats defend and rally around their candidate come hell or high water.

    Unlike the GOPe who have attacked Trump at every turn.

  14. ….based on FBI sources, FBI agents in New York and elsewhere have been looking into the Clinton Foundation for several months. They suspect that this “charity” was selling political favors by then Secretary of State Clinton in exchange for donations that personally benefited the Clinton family.

    The Justice Department blocked further aggressive investigations into the issue, allegedly because of the ongoing election. A high FBI official, Andrew McCabe, also showed disinterest in a further pursuit of the issue. McCabe’s wife had just tried to get elected as state senator and had receive a campaign donation of nearly $500,000 from Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a Clinton friend and at times board member of the Clinton Foundation. The FBI agents pursuing the investigation into the Clinton Foundation were not amused.

    Moon of Alabama

  15. Unbelievable!

    Hillary Clinton’s Emailgate Is an Attack on Women


    Robin Lakoff is a professor of linguistics at the University of California, Berkeley, and the author of Language and Woman’s Place

    ‘It’s not about emails; it’s about public communication by a woman’

    I am mad. I am mad because I am scared. And if you are a woman, you should be, too. Emailgate is a bitch hunt, but the target is not Hillary Clinton. It’s us.

    The only reason the whole email flap has legs is because the candidate is female. Can you imagine this happening to a man? Clinton is guilty of SWF (Speaking While Female), and emailgate is just a reminder to us all that she has no business doing what she’s doing and must be punished, for the sake of all decent women everywhere. There is so much of that going around.

  16. Emails Also Reveal Special Favor for Top Clinton Foundation Donor, Distribution of Clinton State Department Schedule to Foundation Staff


    OCTOBER 31, 2016

    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released 323 pages of new Department of State documents, including previously unreleased email exchanges in which Clinton and top aide Huma Abedin sent classified information over Clinton’s clintonemail.com unsecure email system. According to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemptions cited in the documents obtained by Judicial Watch, three of the Clinton-Abedin email exchanges contained material “classified to protect national security.”

    Also included in the newly obtained documents is an additional instance of the State Department doing special favors for a high-dollar Clinton Foundation donor. And the documents include instances of the distribution by State Department officials of Clinton’s government schedule to members of the Clinton Foundation staff.

    The documents contain not previously turned over to the State Department, bringing the known total to date of such emails uncovered by Judicial Watch to 238 new Clinton emails (not part of the 55,000 pages of emails that Clinton turned over to the State Department). These records further appear to contradict statements by Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails were turned over to the State Department.

    The new records include three separate Clinton-Abedin email exchanges withheld in part from Judicial Watch under the State Department’s “B1” FOIA exemption, applying to “Information that is classified to protect national security”:

  17. James Carville, MSNBC, October 31, 2016:

    “The House Republicans and the KGB are trying to influence our democracy. This is in effect an attempt to hijack an election. It’s unprecedented. Comey was acting in concert and coordination with the House Republicans. We also have the extraordinary case of the KGB being involved in this race and selectively leaking things from the Clinton campaign that they hacked. It would seem to me that the FBI shouldn’t be getting rolled by the House Republicans, that’s what happened here. There’s nothing else that’s going on. And in the meantime, democracy is under assault by the KGB. To me that’s something we ought to be talking about. This is an unprecedented event that was done on behalf of the House Republicans. And as we know the KGB is all over this election and this is what we are talking about? We ought to be talking about our democracy is under assault right now and what we are going to do about it.”

  18. Clinton News Network is an accurate description.

    (((Gloria Borger)))

    Yet another journalist has been exposed by WikiLeaks as a Hillary Clinton cheerleader — this time it’s CNN chief political analyst Gloria Borger.

    Borger sent Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta an email on February 12, 2016 titled: “U r a tv star!”

    In the email, Borger knocked the Republican Party and praised Hillary.

    “I have been in gop hell. Will reach out soon! U good?,” Borger wrote to Podesta. Podesta replied, “Yup.” Borger then said, “[Hillary] had a really good debate tonite.”


  19. Unreal! The Injustice Dept.


    Peter J. Kadzik, a Justice Department assistant attorney general, is helping lead the revisited FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.
    “We assure you that the Department will continue to work closely with the FBI and together, dedicate all necessary resources and take appropriate steps as expeditiously as possible,” Kadzik wrote in a letter to Congress, reassuring Democrats that the Justice Department would work to resolve the situation.

    Zero Hedge strings together Kadzik’s long standing relationship with Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair John Podesta, beginning with his representation in the Monica Lewinsky case.

    “Fantastic lawyer. Kept me out of jail,” Podesta wrote in 2008, according to the Washington Free Beacon’s Lachlan Markay, recommending him to assist the Obama transition team vet potential candidates.

    As reported by the Daily Caller’s Chuck Ross, Podesta met with Kasdik for dinner the day after Hillary Clinton testified before the House Select Committee on Benghazi.

    It was one of several occasions that Podesta and Kasdik met socially during the election. Kadzik’s son also asked Podesta for a job on the Clinton campaign, in an email sent in May 2015.

    • (((Kadzik))) and wife (((Weiss))).

      Have we already been conquered by corrupt and bloodthirsty (neocon) Jews?

Comments are closed.