Rush: The Democrat Party Is a Hate Group

It is good to see Rush talking about the -isms and -phobias:

“RUSH: The Democrat Party is a shrinking and dwindling hate group. That’s literally what they’ve become. You know, I remember the reason why I say that and why I think that this is an important point. Early in my career, when I was still learning about all this, when I was wet behind the ears and naive… Up until the time I started this radio show, nobody that knew me ever thought I was a hatemonger or a racist or homophobic or sexist or bigoted or any of that. Nobody. There wasn’t anybody.

Six months after being on the radio with this program, I’d become all of that. And I remember… I don’t want to mention names here because these people are still alive. …

George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, Donald Trump. Take your pick. They are hated; they are not opposed, and I wish an even bigger percentage of the American people would figure this out. The American people are running around thinking that all the hate and the racism and all these other isms are located on the Republican Party side. The Republican Party has bent over backwards not even criticizing Democrats in hopes that people wouldn’t think they’re what the Democrats say they are, while the Democrats go out and behave that way times ten all the time every day and never get called on it.

But they are the hate groups, they are the hate party, they are the people that literally thrive and subsist on it. And you can see it. You can see it in these protests. You can see it in these so-called acts of dissent, which are nothing more than riots. …”

The Democrats really do come at you with a dozen -isms and -phobias. Those are the things which make you a terrible person. In contrast, it makes them saints. They have a “conscience.”

Note: I’ve never been a talk radio listener. I might have to start tuning in.

About Hunter Wallace 12380 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent


    • Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, White countries for Everyone!
      Anti-Whites say what is non-White belongs to non-Whites and what is White ALSO belongs to non-Whites.

      They say they are anti-racist, what they really are is anti-White.
      Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

  1. Rush, I suspect, has a very good idea of the Red Pill reality.

    He walks a fine line dealing with a mass audience, keeping his advertisers happy, and having his mainstream conservative buddies continue to invite him to the establishment party. On the other hand, he has enough money and fame where he could break free if he had sufficient backing. It just may be with Trump in the White House, there is a new wind blowing through the country and he is going to sail with it, so to speak.

    It’s worth getting him on the side of White Nationalism. He’s what is called in the infowar field a Key Communicator. His word carries with a lot of people who could be won over to the cause.

  2. Little while back Rush was talking about removal of MLK bust and the media frenzy,Rush said ” it wasn’t thrown in the trash.

  3. These sound like good words. Let’s pump it up. The Democrat Party is a traitor party holding allegiance to foreign powers. That’s what needs to start being made clear. They serve Europe’s master.

    • ‘These sound like good words. Let’s pump it up. The Democrat Party is a traitor party’

      Good talking point that hasn’t been hammered frequently enough.

  4. He’s normally pretty circumspect with words. That sounds like someone ready to have a conflict.

  5. I never really paid much mind to Rush for most of my life, but from what I’ve read about him in recent times in the altright-sphere, he really does seem like he knows the score (or is at least close to it). Wish I’d paid attention sooner. Same with Coulter.

    • Ann Coulter, yesterday:


      The Clinton administration used the executive branch’s broad power over immigration to send a 6-year-old boy back to a communist dictatorship. The courts were completely powerless to stop him.

      As explained by the federal appellate court that ruled on Elian Gonzalez’s asylum application: “It is the duty of the Congress and of the executive branch to exercise political will,” and “in no context is the executive branch entitled to more deference than in the context of foreign affairs,” which includes immigration.

      The court acknowledged that Elian might well be subjected to “re-education,” “communist indoctrination” and “political manipulation.” (Then again, so would enrolling him at Sidwell Friends.) It didn’t matter! Sending little boys back to communist dictatorships was the policy of the Clinton administration.

      The Obama administration’s immigration policy was to ensure that millions of poverty-stricken foreigners would come here and help turn our country into a Mexican version of Pakistan.

      When Arizona merely tried to enforce the federal immigration laws being ignored by the Obama administration, the entire media erupted in rage at this incursion into the majestic power of the president over immigration. They said it was like living in Nazi Germany!

      The most reviled section of the act, melodramatically called the “Papers Please” law, was upheld by the Supreme Court. But the other parts, allowing state officials to enforce federal immigration laws, were ruled unconstitutional. A president’s policy choice to ignore immigration laws supersedes a state’s right to enforce them.

      The court conceded that hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens were arrested in Arizona each year, that they were responsible for “a disproportionate share of serious crime,” and that illegals constituted nearly 6 percent of Arizona’s population.

      But Arizona was powerless to enforce laws on the books — if those laws happened to be about immigration. The president’s authority over immigration is absolute and exclusive, as part of his authority over foreign policy.


      • Now, Ann also knows that these legal points are meaningless. It’s wrong to exclude Mexicans and Asians and Africans from America. Everything else is just red tape.

        • And she’ll never name The Kike, or (with her being a muz-mudshark) attack Muslims as Muslims.


          This is what kikology looks like:

          T’ruah gathers in New York to galvanize activists in the pulpit

          By Marjorie Ingall, Tablet, February 8, 2017

          On Monday night, around 200 rabbis marched from B’nai Jeshurun synagogue on the Upper West Side to the Trump Hotel on West 61st Street. They were joined by members of Jews for Racial and Economic Justice, Avodah, HIAS, the Union for Reform Judaism, and the MultiFaith Alliance for Syrian Refugees. Hundreds of people sang “Hinei Matov” (“How good it is for brothers and sisters to sit together”), “Gesher Tsar Me’od” (“The world is a narrow bridge”), and “Olam Chesed Yibaneh” (“We will build this world with love”). They chanted “This is what tefilah looks like” and “This is what theology looks like.”

  6. Rush is a pretty good barometer of Jew anxiety. When out of the blue for no apparent reason Rush defends the Jews, you know (((they))) are worried.

  7. “The Democrats really do come at you with a dozen -isms and -phobias. Those are the things which make you a terrible person. In contrast, it makes them saints. They have a ‘conscience.'” :

    “Conscience does make cowards of us all, and thus the native hue of resolution is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought, and enterprises of great pith and moment with this regard their currents turn awry, and lose the name of action.”

  8. Rush knows plenty. And knowing all that, he worked to keep whites on the Republican plantation, not really pushing them towards something better.

    He’s no Ann Coulter, who legitimately took a risk to advance white interests, he only came along grudgingly.

    Perhaps he’s useful, but not to be trusted.

  9. Rush Limbaugh will never cross the line in the sand drawn by the Jewish elite. His whole career has been built on teasing white American Christian heterosexual men.

    • Disagree. Rush’s whole career has basically been reading liberal news outlets and rebutting it. Its a very effective tactic, and you have to remember he was the ONLY alternative to the liberal Network News and newspapers in 1993. Yes, he’s safe and doesn’t name the Jew but Rush shattered a taboo of questioning the media. For that alone, he’s an important figure. Trump wouldn’t have been President without Rush sowing the seeds of media doubt (he calls them mediots) back in the 90s.

  10. The Democratic Party changed in the 1960s. The Democrats have been Cultural Marxists since the 1960s. However that’s changing now. The Democratic Party celebrates every single race, sodomite, and liberal in America. However the party only has a passing mention about “Rural America” or White America. I’d say the Democrats are abandoning Cultural Marxism (Forced Mixing) and become a Minority Supremacists political party that’s open against White People. The Alt Right should stay active in changing the GOP from a “Conservative” party into a Nationalist party representing Traditional Values and White Pride. When the GOP officially rejects the Alt Right and keeps our candidates off the Ballot…..the Alt Right should focus hardcore on Third Party / Independent candidates and run directly against Democrats and Republicans in future elections. WPWW !

  11. Rush, conservatives favorite junkie. There was a time he would be recognized as the traitor that he is.

Comments are closed.