MILO Goes Mainstream

MILO was on Real Time With Bill Maher the other night:

“By inviting “alt right” (aka white supremacist) darling Milo Yiannopoulos (known as “Milo”) onto his HBO show Friday night, Bill Maher could’ve seized a great opportunity to expose Yiannopoulos’ history of hate. After all, Yiannopoulos has spewed so much toxic garbage that he was permanently banned by Twitter in 2016, which says a lot, considering the cesspool that swirls on that platform.

So when Maher faced Yiannopoulos on Friday, did the HBO host press him on his view that college rape culture is a fiction and that women are often lying when they report being raped? Did Maher ask him about his anti-Semitic comment that “Jews run the media,” or did he ask why Yiannopoulos wore a Nazi Iron Cross when he was younger? Did Maher press him on his demonization of transgender people as, in essence, sexual predators?

No. Instead Maher actually bonded with the extremist author and lecturer on their shared anti-Muslim views. Yiannopoulos complimented Maher: “You’re sound on Islam unlike most people on your show.” To which Maher glowingly responded, “Yes, that’s true.” (Although when Maher remarked that all religions were “stupid and dangerous,” Yiannopoulos pushed back noting that, as a Catholic, he thinks his own faith is great.) …”

MILO is going to be the keynote speaker at CPAC:

“Following the news that MILO will deliver the keynote address at this year’s Conservative Political Action Committee (CPAC) conference, both leftists and establishment conservatives have taken to Twitter to express their outrage.
Freedom of speech and the protection of the First Amendment have become one of the defining issues for the conservative movement, especially amongst young people.

Based upon experiences on his nationwide college tour — where the events have aroused numerous violent protests by left-wing activists, attracting worldwide attention — the invitation is further confirmation that MILO is now the leading free speech advocate in America’s conservative movement. …”

He’s not claiming to be an Alt-Right leader.

MILO is a conservative or cultural libertarian now. That’s fine. It’s a more accurate label. He’s their problem now. I’m actually enjoying all the pearl clutching from the #TruCons. I do happen to agree with MILO on the free speech issue. My take is that it says a lot about the weakness of the conservative brand that Donald Trump is president and Milo Yiannopoulos is giving the keynote speech at CPAC when he doesn’t even really want to be associated with that label.

If conservatism is so weak it is unable to fend off MILO, where does the Beltway Right go from here?

Note: I’ve been highly critical of MILO, but if he can defund these universities, stigmatize the antifas and break the culture of political correctness on college campuses then I will be the first to give him credit for it.

About Hunter Wallace 12380 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent


  1. I agree with your assessment. Milo long ago lived out his usefulness to White identity politics imo. While he does have a big audience, and has some talents, let someone else be responsible for owning him. He is a showman and we need to build legitimate institutions.

  2. Ashke-Nazis (Ashkenazi Jews) are the New Nazis in the globalist world order. They want New War with Russia & supremacist domination.

  3. “He’s not claiming to be an Alt-Right leader.”

    He already rejected the label a few months back on Breitbart.

  4. Bill Maher types start off the topic with “ high school he was just a dork, and now he has the megaphone shows inferiority complex.

    • Reminds me of that roast that Trump and Clinton went to last year…never seen so many Jews packed into a supposedly Catholic event before.

  5. It makes perfect sense why Milo would be on Maher’s show, and why Maher would be so cordial when he would never be that way with a Jared Taylor or Richard Spencer type. Milo is the poster boy for controlled opposition.

    1) He’s Jewish.
    2) He’s a highly self-absorbed and self-serving flaming homosexual.
    3) He constantly talks about his black boyfriends.
    4) He has made it abundantly clear that he rejects the idea of racialism and identity politics.
    5) He’s much more concerned about status, popularity and polishing up a facade of civility more than he is concerned about getting dirty and cracking open and exposing the unfettered truth that lies just beneath that facade.
    6) He has no real “skin in the game” and can move Left or Right depending on current trends and personal motivations.

    There’s nothing really controversial or even all that unique about Milo other than the fact that he is a homosexual who is currently attacking some Leftists more than he is those on the Right. But the reasons he would go out of his way to specifically attack Islam and feminists are very obvious. Again, he’s a flaming homosexual whose main ambition in life is to try to be controversial—a consummate contrarian—in order to get a spotlight and hold up his flamboyant man-love for the whole world to see.

  6. What I am taking away from your recent articles on this Milo guy is that he is emblematic of the crossing over of the ‘new alt-right tough guy’ into metrosexual circles.

    If gays feels comfortable to think in patterns similar to us, (as many of them did, historically) that’s a very auspicious sign for us.

  7. Logical choice for respectable conservative 2.0. Yet, the looney left considers him to be a Nazi right along with Richard Spencer and Donald Trump. Anyone to the right of Hillary Clinton is a Nazi.

  8. Look, he’s doing the work for us. We need success on multiple fronts. Exposing the Left’s lies and hypocrisy is huge. Before disparaging him, I want an estimate of how many on the Left he has converted

    He produces intense pain for our enemies. That’s enough for me.

    • i agree. if they point & sputter at Milo now – in 6 months they’ll point & sputter equally at R. Spencer – & 6 months later they point & sputter at A. Anglin or M. Heimbach. Hell, a year ago they pointed & sputtered at spineless cuckservatives!

      may the progressives triggering stay equal as we go from civic nationalism to white nationalism. progressives like equality – they’ll keep their triggering equal.

  9. The very effective street fighting National Socialist SA were also homosexuals. It seemed that at that time and place, clean living, Conservative Christian gentlemen just weren’t up for down and dirty street fighting with the worst Communists, Antifas, marxists etc.

    When AH was negotiating with the Conservative Prussian military to have them back AH and the National Socialists, he made a deal that he would break up the Socialist, homosexual led SA and restore the traditional German/Prussian army as the official German Army. The deal was made, Hitler became chancellor and there was….

    The Night of the Long Knives.

    Homosexual Socialists were no longer leading the NS German street fighting force.

    The situation is similar with gays like Milo Y. Yeah, we wish some straight guy more like us could get on HBO with Bill Maher or we wish we owned HBO, but that’s just not reality.

    There’s always been Gay people. Always will in some way – healthier White societies have way less open homosexuality, but that’s after we win power somewhere.

    • ‘The very effective street fighting National Socialist SA were also homosexuals.’

      Excellent point, Mr. Ellis.

      In fact, in German culture, it has long been that there is a secret tradition of homosexuality in the manliest and most martial of corps.

      Sinful behavior and sexual deviance is not necessarily an indicator of a person’s total ability to contribute to a society.

      I agree with you : the model of society ought be, towards, gays, what we had when I was a child ; do what you want, but, keep it out of public view.

      In this atmosphere of ‘tolerance’, i notice that the generations behind me have a startling number of gay men.

      Normalizing sexual deviance not wise.

      • Junius you are a very learned man. Have we ever met in person? Amren moved their Tennessee conference to the middle of the hot summer so I don’t think I want to go.

    • ‘The very effective street fighting National Socialist SA were also homosexuals.’


      You’ve been reading too many anti-German disinformation specialists.

      There may have been some fags in the ranks as is there are a few everywhere but the NS’s were not pro queer.

      To the contrary.

        • I know of Rohm. The idea that the Nazis were started by homos and leadership positions were comprised by significant numbers of homos is a myth.

          I mean, really?

          Every slanderous, nonsensical thing imaginable has been written about Hitler, Nazis and Germans since WW2.

          If whites today actually formed street forces in response to lefty, commie antifa brawlers from where do you think they would be chosen?

          The queer community?

          Not hardly.

          Most LGBTQXYZ’s s are in total opposition.

          Same situation in Germany last century.

  10. Milo represents Milo.

    It does cause me great amusement that the left is attacking gay Jews who brag about their interracial boyfriends.

Comments are closed.