Theresa May Refuses To Name London Terror Suspect

March 23, 2017 Hunter Wallace Britain, Europe, Immigration, Islam, Multiculturalism, PC, Terrorism 19

Update: Scotland Yard has formally identified the London terrorist as Khalid Masood.

I’m getting so tired of this.

It is becoming a pattern: a terrorist attack happens in Europe, police stonewall on releasing the name of the suspect (if they release it at all), and the incident drops out of the news cycle because bloggers on social media are waiting on the name of the suspect to write about the story.

This morning we learned from Theresa May that the London terrorist was a British born Islamist who had been previously investigated by the government. Beyond that, we still don’t have a name.

About Hunter Wallace 12392 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

19 Comments

  1. Look at parliament faces do they rule or are agents of international corporate whores demands further draconian laws to weaken sovereignty for turd world.

  2. Every terrorist in Europe recently is then said to “be known by police”. I am ready to entertain the terrifying notion that all these secret service, intelligence agencies are actually the problem not the solution.

    • Hunter banned Chris 313 because, I think it was after the Dallas Cops kilt by a Dindu shooting, Chris posted an immortal dissertation on his short-lived blog, to whit “How to talk to a cop”

    • In a sense I suppose the police protect the darkies from the rough justice of whitey.

  3. You know, Hunter, I spent my working life aboard American Merchant Ships as an engineer. Today’s politicians can be summed up by what we used to call people like TearRaiser May: “she wouldn’t say “Shit” if she had a mouthful”. Waves of meaningless words; nihilism.

  7. Theresa May is an enemy of the British people. She hates her own kind. She banned me from coming over there and speaking to a patriotic group about the problems of immigration and EU consolidation even though I am of British roots, pdo-monarchy and a traditionalist Anglican. At the same time she brings in tons of Muslims who endanger her people. She should be tried as an enemy of the nation.

  8. There are now three big forces in the world: Globalism(largely controlled by Jews), Nationalism(controlled by gentiles of each nation), and Islam.

    Nationalism is powerful but it is not a grand ideology. It is limited within particular national borders.

    In contrast, globalism and Islam seek world dominance. It is no wonder that the main clash is between these two ideo-empires.

    Islam is universalist, and globalism is imperialist. When Big Forces collide, each vies for supremacy.

    It’s like Cold Front meeting Warm Front. It leads to storms and hails.

    Both are violent on a worldwide scale. Muslims will use violence and war to spread Jihad.

    Globalism will use bombs, sanctions, financial warfare, and worse to destroy entire nations that won’t put out. Look at fate of Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, etc.

    Marxism was the other grand ideology, but it died. Whatever radical element it had joined up with globalism that is a fusion of oligarch capitalists, decadents, and radical nihilism. In former Soviet Republic states, many former Marxists reverted to Islam.

    So, it’s Globalism vs Islam.

    We accuse Islam of violence, and yes, Muslims can be violent.

    But globalism has been the far more aggressive, destructive, and invasive force. Muslim terrorism killed 1000s in the West. Globalist imperialism has come close to killing a million or more in the Muslim World.

    Because of the Cold War, there was a kind of alliance between globalists and Muslims, esp in Afghanistan. But fall of communism no longer made the alliance viable.

    In material terms, globalism is 1000x more powerful and well-funded than Islam despite the riches of Saudis and Gulf states(that, despite their Islamism, is allied with globo-US against Iran).

    But Islam has certain advantages. Islam is spreading worldwide. Muslims have no guilt conscience. Every Muslim is a warrior of the heart and womb.

    In contrast, the warrior culture of globalism is purely mercenary. It hires and pays soldiers to fight for ‘muh liberty’, but its ideology revolves around Beastie Boys ‘right to party’, homomania, ‘pussy hats’, and tattoos & piercings. Globalism is mega-rich but utterly vacuous and degenerate morally and spiritually. Whites and yellows who are the core demography of globalism have forgotten how to create life. They prefer materiality and ‘liberty’ over life, family, and culture.

    Also, there is lack of unity between elites and masses in globalism. Among Muslims, there is spiritual unity between Muslim leaders and Muslim masses. Among globalists, it’s a case of Jewish oligarchs like Soros and Adelson throwing cash around to foment divisions or support Israel in a world in which Jews are less than 0.1% of the population. Most people of the globo-west have no strong idea of what globalism is about. For some, it’s Hollywood movies for the world. For SJW’s, it worship of Statue of Liberty. For homos, it’s homo parade in every nation.

    Globalist soldiers are the best in the world in training and equipment, but the globalist masses have no idea what they’re fighting for.

    But every Muslim knows why a Muslim fights and carries on with Jihad either violently or culturally or reproductively.

    How much of Muslim terror in the West is for Jihad; how much is it for revenge?

    If it’s a matter of revenge, it has less to do with ideology and more to do with a sense of ‘justice’.

    It’s like US got revenge for Pearl Harbor and 9/11. Indeed, US extended the revenge for 9/11 even to Iraq even though Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11.

    So, the logic of revenge is part of politics.

    So, some of these attacks by Muslims are not about religion but about retaliation for globalism’s war on the Muslim world. Even 9/11 was ‘blowback’. If Muslims attack all things ‘infidel’, why don’t they target Brazil and Japan with their vile decadent cultures?

    Imagine if China became far more powerful than the US. Suppose China stations troops in the US and carries out operations that decimate entire cities. Suppose so many Americans are reduced to refugee status like in the original RED DAWN. Suppose China decides to put on a Nice Humanitarian Face and allow American refugees to come live in China. While some Americans might be cuckishly grateful for China’s generosity, might not some Americans want to get even with the ‘slanty-eyed buggers’? Might they not carry out acts of terror? Would it be proper to blame the violence on Uncle-Sam-ism? Wouldn’t the violence really be more about revenge than any belief in American values?

    So, I think much of the Muslim violence has to be seen as retaliatory than religious.

    If the US feels what it did in WWII against Germany and Japan was morally justified on grounds of revenge, then Muslims have a case too.

    That said, because Muslims do have a universalist, warrior, and missionary creed, Islam rage(even when retaliatory) takes on a prophetic and even apocalyptic tone. Once Muslims get riled up, their rage just keeps burning. It’s sort of like once Jews have a certain resentment, it never seems to go away until their enemy is totally ground into the dirt.

    Also, Muslims must be frustrated by the schizo character of globalism. It has the mightiest military in the world that can destroy entire Muslim nations in no time. But when Muslims go to the West, they don’t see a race of mighty warriors and heroes but a bunch of cucks, pansies, wussies, and dorks who get pushed around by shameless sluts, henpecking feminists, goofy Jews, funny homos, nasty Negroes, and even trannies.

    The West is still defined by the image of the White Male, and the globo military is still dominated by white men from top to bottom. They are badass killers who make Muslims shi* their pants in the desert, like in the movie AMERICAN SNIPER.

    But when Muslims come to the West, they see all those pansy white boys who cower before Negroes, kiss toes of Jews, get henpecked by wenches, pushed around by slut daughters, and do nothing to protect their women from rape gangs.

    Muslims fear the globo-mercenary force, but they see the west as a soft underbelly, or an overripe fruit just waiting to drop from the tree.

    Nationalism would be the best thing for most nations, but globalism weakens all nationalisms. Only nations sufficiently big like China, Russia, and Iran can maintain true nationalism against the globalist tide. All other nations have become vassals of the US empire whose invite/invade strategy is messing up the whole world.

    But unlike most peoples, Muslims will not succumb to globalist since they have a grand eternalist sense of what is right and wrong.

    In contrast, Japanese no longer feel any sacred connection to their culture or history. Into globo-disposable cosplay culture, they follow the US and even have homo parades. Japanese people have become like gadgets and robots and cartoon characters.

    So, non-Muslim nations that cannot sustain autonomous nationalism like Russia, China, and Iran just succumb to globalism.

    But Muslims resist because they do have a durable sense of what is right, holy, and sacred.

    Also, they still believe in the faith. In contrast, no one cares about the church of England whose latest theme is ‘gay marriage’. Because Christianity is a pacifistic religion, it wilts and fades without the protection of a Noble Warrior Class.

    In contrast, Islam is a fusion of warrior creed and spiritual vision. To believe in and of itself is to be a warrior. A Muslim can defend himself. In contrast, a true Christian must turn the other cheek, and if he chooses to fight, he must feel guilty afterwards.

    Also, materialist globalism means you are NOTHING unless you got status and money. In contrast, even the lowest poorest Muslim feels as the man of God.

    There is a kind of quasi-spirituality to globalism with its New Age do-gooderism, but can anyone explain what Ashley Judd and madonna were yammering about at the ‘pussy hat’ pandemonium? It’s virtue as faddishness.

    So, in a way, Samuel Huntington called it right. It is about Islam vs the West. But he was wrong in one sense because Globalism, not the West, is the main contender with Islam. Globalism has already swallowed up the West; it is fusing the West with the Rest, and this voracity is advancing at rapid pace and unfortunately succeeding all too well in Latin America, Asian, and non-Muslim Africa. They are all turning into variations of Rammstein’s Amerika, and the US and EU are being third-world-ized in turn by these crass materialists whose main culture is rap, hollywood, and video games.

    It is Muslims who’ve thrown the monkey wrench into this globalist project by rejecting globalist ideology and values(and we should be thankful for that since it sticks in the craw of the GLOB monster). Even though Muslim mass entry into the West happens under globalism, Muslims will not bow down to globalist creeds and fads.

    Now, I think sharia is pretty backward and brutish. But, does anyone really think current Western values are any better?

    Worship of homos and trannies? Christian bakers destroyed for decency and integrity?

    Goy worship of Jews and Zionism in Congress?

    Anti-white vitriol from the mass media?

    Rap Music as expression of america pride?

    White boys raised to be cuck-wussies into Gayria, Negria, and Zioria?

    What kind of girls white fathers are now raising? Should these men be prouder than Muslim men because they have ‘western values’ that is now little more than cuckery of the likes of Justin Trudeau?

    http://www.dailywire.com/news/14681/not-sexually-attracted-both-penis-and-vagina-youre-amanda-prestigiacomo

    https://www.facebook.com/waynebraska/videos/407126496315955/

    https://www.facebook.com/NowThisHer/videos/1004623379668537/

    =============================================

  9. His name was Kahlid Masood….that tells you everything you need to know. May states that he was British born, as if this somehow shifts the blame away from pro immigration policies that let his parents in. He’s still a koranimal…..and he’s not British.
    How many in the British parliament are traitorous Jews and enemies of the state? I’d say more than we think.
    The dictatorship of Britain never asked its citizens if they ever wanted this. Never.

  11. A local paper in Australia today called the atrocity ‘an attack on democracy’. Ummm…..what democracy? Islamic and turd world presence in Britain and throughout the West is the result of dictatorships that forced this on us, rather than give us an opportunity to say no. We’re given a say on nothing that affects our lives directly such as immigration or foreign policy.
    We should have the right to say no.
    Meanwhile, Londons Muslim mayer has addressed a candlelight vigil. Peace, love, inclusion and candlelight vigils are the answer…that’ll put things right…
    Remember, we have Islam because we don’t have democracy.

Comments are closed.