Roy Moore Defeats GOP Establishment in Alabama US Senate Race

Right-wing populist Southern Christian candidate and former judge Roy Moore defeated US Senate Leader Mitch McConnell, the endorsement of a popular (in Alabama, at least) sitting US president and $10 million dollars in advertising against him to win the GOP run-off for a US senate seat in the Heart of Dixie. Judge Moore won with 55% of the vote, CNN says. It is a breath-taking victory against the establishment. Politico reports:

Roy S. Moore, a firebrand former chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, overcame efforts by top Republicans to rescue his rival, Senator Luther Strange, soundly defeating him on Tuesday in a special primary runoff.

The outcome in the closely watched Senate race dealt a humbling blow to President Trump and other party leaders days after the president pleaded with voters in the state to back Mr. Strange.

Propelled by the stalwart support of his fellow evangelical Christians, Mr. Moore survived an advertising onslaught of more than $10 million financed by allies of Senator Mitch McConnell, the majority leader. His victory demonstrated in stark terms the limits of Mr. Trump’s clout.

Taking the stage after a solo rendition of “How Great Thou Art,” an exultant Mr. Moore said he had “never prayed to win this campaign,” only putting his political fate “in the hands of the Almighty.”

Moore has endorsed using the US military to stop illegal immigration. As Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court he was suspended for instructing judges to defy Federal orders mandating homosexual marriage.

About Palmetto Patriot 242 Articles
South Carolinian. Southern Nationalist. Anglican.


  1. It’s the beginning of ripples that started in 2010 – with the advent of The Tea Party and Sarah Palin,

    At this point, it’s quickly becoming a tropical storm that is set to, piece by piece, dismantle the Transnational Corporate Globalists who thought they had our demise all sewn up.

    Replace one mediocre or bad Southerner with a really good one, and a new day shall happen upon us, as a matter of course.

    This is very sweet, particularly after President Trump’s weekly wiffle waffles.

  2. As long as the jews, liberals and cucks are upset then you know things are going in the right direction. And those creeps are definitely upset about Moore’s victory.

    • Indeed. The more upset they are, the better things are becoming for all white Americans. I love it when Jews kvetch over everything whites do to better their lot in life. They must be chokingon this one like a cat bolting a canary whole.

  3. The media libs are now totally conflicted. They are thrilled Trump endorsed Strange lost but hate Judge Moore as much as Trump.

  4. Christian Zionist warmonger defeats average Republiscam cuck.

    (((AIPAC))) is happy.

    you occidental dissenters still have a lot to learn.












  5. Sounds good, but don’t put all your eggs in the basket of the Christian religious right or the top of really any tax exempt Christian denomination like the Latter Day Saints.

    Just because a guy looks like one of us and has a lot of our enemies, it doesn’t mean he’s one of us on the most important thing. M’thinks this guy really likes all these pro Israel Neo Conservative US wars and I bet he loved the 1980s with Reagan fighting the Russians.

    OK, please tell me our folks in South Carolina are finally going to put up someone against lisping Lindsey Graham.

  6. This is the continuing process that pre-election candidate Trump was in charge of. This time though, President Trump sided with the establishment and was thoroughly handed his ballots.

    Moore and many like him, will represent anti establishment GOP victories everywhere. Now, what they do with their victories is to be seen; I would postulate we will get just more of the same.

    Now Moore’s victory may have just been because the establishment spent way too much money against him thus causing suspicion in the general voting population.

    As far as Moore’s views concerning our political spectrum, I see no ally there. He will though be a trouble maker on a national level.

    • Why would they? Groids kill whites all the time, to the point where it is passé. You may as well have a report on the birds flying and water being wet.

      Now, whites killing groids? So rare that it is immediate news.

      And if they spin it so that it sounds more commonplace?

      Hey. Gotta get dem ratings, goyim. Ratings is shekels, and shekels is ??????.

  7. Trump overplayed his hand.

    He decided to back the loser, thus extending a “concession” to Bitch McCocksuckle in supposed goodwill, while sending his own people to boost Moore, who was easily going to win.

    This way he can shrug his shoulders at Bitchboy and say “sorry, even I can’t help you guys out; people just hate you.”

    However, he doesn’t realize that we are tired of this double-talking wheel-and-deal. Yeah, it may have worked out in our favor this time, but when it doesn’t…

    He’s playing Russian Roulette without knowing how many chambers are loaded in the first place, and we stand more of a chance of becoming casualties than he does.

    As for Moore…eh. I’m with Haxo, More, and Jack up there.

    The election and C-ville showed us that we cannot work within or rely on the system to change things, or even function properly in the first place, and having another Neo-cuck in office is almost as bad as a Democrap.

    Sharpen your knives, gird your loins, praise the Lord, and pass the ammunition.

    It will get worse before it gets better, goyim.

  8. There was a time when Americans believed in freedom.

    The US is dying from a million cuts. Part of the reason the USA is a nanny police state now is that whenever there is a problem, the kneejerk reaction in the US is to call for a new law.

    Nanny state laws are not the best solution, however. Nanny state laws lead to more laws, higher fines, and tougher sentences. Thirty-five years ago, DWI laws were enacted that led to DWI checkpoints and lower DWI levels. Seatbelt laws led to backseat seatbelt laws, childseat laws, and pet seatbelt laws. Car liability insurance laws led to health insurance laws and gun liability laws. Smoking laws that banned smoking in buildings led to laws against smoking in parks and then bans against smoking in entire cities. Sex offender registration laws led to sex offender restriction laws and violent offender registration laws.

    Nanny state laws don’t make us safer, either. Nanny state laws lead people to be careless since they don’t need to have personal responsibility anymore. People don’t need to be careful crossing the street now because drunk-driving has been outlawed and driving while using a mobile phone is illegal. People don’t investigate companies or carry out due diligence because businesses must have business licenses now.

    The main point of nanny state laws is not safety. The main purposes of more laws are control and revenue generation for the state.

    Another reason laws are enacted is because corporations give donations to lawmakers to stifle competition or increase sales.

    Many laws are contradictory, too. Some laws say watering lawns is required, while other laws say watering lawns is illegal.

    Many nanny state laws that aim to solve a problem can be fixed by using existing laws. If assault is already illegal, why do we need a new law that outlaws hitting umpires?

    Nanny state laws are not even necessary. If everything was legal would you steal, murder, and use crack cocaine? Aren’t there other ways to solve problems besides calling the police? Couldn’t people educate or talk to people who bother them? Couldn’t people be sued for annoying behavior? Couldn’t people just move away? Even if assault was legal, wouldn’t attackers risk being killed or injured, too? Do people have consciences? Having no laws doesn’t mean actions have no consequences.

    If there is no victim, there is no crime.

    We don’t need thousands of laws when we only need 10.

    Should swimming pools be banned because they are dangerous? Hammers? Bottles? Rocks? Energy drinks? Pillows?

    Where does it end?

    If one state can have self-serve gas stations, why can’t every state have them? If sodas were legal 20 years ago, why can’t they be legal now?

    Freedom is not just a one way street. You can only have freedom for yourself if you allow others to have it.

    Control freaks might get angry when a neighbor owns three indoor cats, but what did the neighbor take from them? Why should this be illegal? Is outlawing cats something a free country should do? Doesn’t banning everything sound like the opposite of liberty?

    Instead of getting mad at people who like freedom, why don’t people realize that freedom is a two way street?

    If you allow others to paint their house purple then you can, too.

    If you allow others to own a gun then you can, too.

    If you allow others to swear then you can, too.

    If you allow others to gamble then you can, too.

    Who wants to live in a prison?

    Think. Question everything.

Comments are closed.