China Trolls the West’s Delusions and Hypocrisies

Respectable political opinion in the West is mostly nonsense. Sometimes, even race realists become so used to the stupidity that we are like the fish who never notice water. Sometimes it takes China, a self-respecting civilization-state, to expose our elites’ silly beliefs and shameless hypocrisy.

American journalists and politicians are in a moral panic over last week’s events. The supposed “failed insurrection” will be used to take away American liberties. However, the demonstrations on Capitol Hill were far tamer than the riots in Independence Square in Ukraine in 2013-2014 or in Hong Kong and Belarus a few months ago. Most American media outlets, left and right, treat those events sympathetically.

Here’s how The New York Times covered Hong Kong in July 2019, when protesters stormed the legislature.

Nancy Pelosi called pro-democracy demonstrations in Hong Kong “a beautiful sight to behold.” She may not have been endorsing violence, but you can’t blame the Chinese authorities for reminding her of it.

China also exploits what Mao would have called our system’s inherent contradictions. This is how China’s Ambassador to Grenada, Zhao Youngchen, described his government’s actions in the Xinjiang region, home of the Uyghur Muslims.

For a long time, the Islamic extremists in Xinjiang forced the non-believers to believe in Islam, enforced the integration of administration and religion, banned Uyghurs from holding traditional Uyghur weddings, listening to modern music, dancing and other cultural activities, discriminated against women, and forced women to veil and wear black robes . . . . All kind and rational women in western world, don’t you think the protection of basic human rights of Uyghur women by the Chinese government is commendable?

China isn’t oppressing the Uyghur minority or crushing its culture; it fighting for women’s liberation against religious fanatics. By their own standards, shouldn’t liberals be cheering?

Just a few days ago, China’s American embassy tweeted that its campaign in Xinjiang had “emancipated” Muslim Uyghur women.

Western media said the tweet was dehumanizing:

What’s wrong with that tweet? When abortion was legalized in Argentina recently, there were huge celebrations and favorable coverage in The New York Times, The Washington Post, and the Associated Press. The latter called it a “feminist triumph that overcame a last-minute appeal by Pope Francis . . . .”

For years, American feminists have been dressing in costumes from The Handmaid’s Tale to defend abortion rights. The novel and television series are crude attacks on Christian conservatives who support big families. As The New Yorker reported, “WE LIVE IN THE REPRODUCTIVE DYSTOPIA OF ‘THE HANDMAID’S TALE.’”

According to American media, traditional sex roles, and large families are ominous, even dangerous. It’s especially scary when women lead conservative movements. Michelle Malkin accurately called the recent television show “Mrs. America” a “character assassination” of its subject, the late Phyllis Schlafly.

Other examples:

Hungary’s government encourages large families. In February 2018, liberated woman and former Swedish Minister for Social Security Annika Strandhäll compared the policy to Nazism. She said it destroyed the “independence women have been fighting for.” Didn’t China give Uyghur women independence?

Apparently not. The New York Times published a column arguing what is being done to the Uyghurs is “genocide.” “Since 1949, the Chinese Communist Party has been gradually rolling out policies that threaten Uighur culture and identity,” writes Amelia Pang in “It Took a Genocide for Me to Remember My Uighur Roots. “There are financial incentives for interethnic marriages between Uighur and Han Chinese couples.”

But aren’t we supposed to think mixed marriage is a wonderful thing? In 2018, the New York Times rejoiced with this headline: “A Sign of ‘Modern Society’: More Multiracial Families in Commercials.” Why are the Times and The Guardian now complaining about efforts to encourage them in China? Besides, what do Uyghur culture and identity really mean? Perhaps there are “problematic” aspects to them. Since CNN tells us “There is no ‘White Culture’,” maybe there’s no Uyghur culture either.

You might argue that the Chinese government wants to eliminate the Uyghurs. You might even say that the Chinese Communist Party is trying to replace them. However, that’s dangerous talk, a paranoid conspiracy theory. How could political and cultural policies possibly have demographic consequences? It’s a ridiculous claim. I can’t put it better than Ambassador Yongchen.

?1/2?For more than 30 years, the birth rate of whites in the US and Britain has continued to decline, and the problem has became more and more serious.Could it be that these countries are also pursuing a policy of genocide of white people? Absolutely not? — ZHAO Yongchen (@DrZhaoyongchen) July 22, 2020

Obviously, we know the game being played. We can say with confidence that Chinese leaders see the Uyghurs as a problem. The CCP is trying to keep Uyghurs from reproducing by destroying their culture and identity.  Western journalists understand this. They know the CCP’s policies weaken the Uyghurs and may ultimately destroy them.

However, China can claim innocence. China’s campaign against the Uyghurs is similar to the one Western elites are waging against whites. Many Western journalists are part of that campaign. Thus, China can continue mocking Western hypocrisy about “values” or “democracy.” What can Western politicians or journalists say back?

If I were Chinese, I might be angry that I can’t criticize Chairman Xi Jinping without suffering massive consequences. However, I’m American, and I’m far angrier that I can’t criticize Martin Luther King or, for that matter, the late George Floyd. I have no illusions that China is a free country, but neither is the United States. If anything, China’s system is better. I don’t want to live under the CCP, but I don’t want to live under Kamala Harris either. So I’ll laugh along with China’s diplomat-trolls, who are speaking the truths that we no longer can.

Only now can rioters in #HongKong see what their God is truly made of. — Global Times (@globaltimesnews) June 11, 2020

First posted to American Renaissance on January 12, 2021.

About Gregory Hood 43 Articles
Gregory Hood has been active in conservative groups in the US. He is a staff writer for American Renaissance. His work is syndicated on the Unz Review and here at Occidental Dissent.


  1. (((They))) want you to hate the innocent. It is always the same with these kykes. But to hate the innocent is against God, Christ and the ways of civilized man. So (((they))) have to lie and scheme to trick you into hating someone or something who did no wrong. Don’t take the bait.

    • Don’t trust anything said or promoted by the U.S. imperialist think-tank “National Committee on U.S.-China Relations.” Members of the board of directors have included Madeleine Albright, Henry Kissinger, Condoleezza Rice, and many other imperialist politicians and corporate executives.

      • Kissinger and Albright were chummy with China back in the day. They both played important roles in the spectacular rise of China in the past four decades.

        However, I posted this video because Kishore is one of the most knowledgeable and objective voices on China. He is always worth lightning to.

  2. See more here: “There are only two obstacles to the success of the global project to rebuild the world. The first is China, whose economic size is at least as large as that of the US, or rather, the scale of the resource base of western financial TNCs (…) While the globalists will be busy strengthening their positions inside the US, on the international stage they will focus on the relatively peaceful rhetoric of ‘returning to the open world of pre-Trump times.’ But then the question of the direct physical destruction of today’s Chinese state will take on an uncontested character. It is important to understand that we are not talking about the direct physical destruction of China, of course. The main task of the globalists will be to achieve a replacement of the country’s fusing elite for a more pro-western one that is willing to put ‘global money’ into the internal economy of China (…) The second (obstacle) though smaller in economic size, but not inferior in geopolitical significance, is Russia, which is an obstacle to the global civilisational reformatting of the world by transnational capital. Raw materials, especially energy reserves of the Russian Federation, as well as the domestic market for European technologies, allow Moscow not only to successfully compete in the EU with Washington, but also directly interfere with the process of the American recolonisation of Europe. And without it, the globalists’ own resources are acutely insufficient for successful competition with China. Especially to defeat it. In addition, Russia offers Europe an alternative civilisational project based on traditional, compared to globalism, even conservative values….”

  3. China genocides the Uyghurs, the “Mainstream” media complains. Israel genocides the Palestinians, the “Mainstream” media is silent and will attack anyone mentioning it as “anti-semites.”

    The Chinese Communist Party says the Uyghur people are a “social construct” while the “American Mainstream” media says that the White American people are a “social construct” – in fact, “white people” don’t even exist, and if they did “whiteness” needs to be “eradicated” anyway.

    When Turkey bans the Kurdish flag, the “American Mainstream media” calls it cultural genocide. When USA bands the Confederate flag, they call it “anti-racism.”

    Once you see it …

    • “When USA bands [sic] the Confederate flag, they call it ‘anti-racism.'”

      Well, yes—because the Confederacy was an ideological polity, as is America and as was the USSR.

      (Experto crede: “Our new government[‘s] foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man.” )

      But you know that.

      • “an ideological polity, as is America and as was the USSR”:

        No resemblance at all. The two are complete opposites. One was a union of different PEOPLES’ democratic socialist republics, versus “ours,” which is a race-less, non-ethnic, fake-democratic anti-communist federal government that exists solely to protect and facilitate Capitalism. Now only one survives. As Paul Craig Roberts once admitted, the fall of the Soviet Union was the greatest tragedy of our lifetime.

        • The Soviet Union was a nightmare, as was Medieval Christendom and as is Multicultural America. The three great Jewish constructs.

    • “Israel genocides the Palestinians, the “Mainstream” media is silent”:

      Former CIA director, now S.of S., Pompeo, announced a few days ago that the legitimate government of the people of Yemen, who are being genocided by us, is being declared a terrorist organization!

  4. Re: The CIA’s “Uyghur genocide” conspiracy theory tactic in the U.S. hybrid war on China:

    A must-read article by a Pennsylvanian-American ex-pat who moved to China and sees all first-hand:

    More by Metallicman:

    • @anonymous CCP,

      Who cares? If China wants to rid themselves of their muslim problem, it isn’t any our concern.

      Let the over one and a half billion muslims declare a jihad, I’d their fellow Muslims are in such jeopardy.

      My concern is for people of European descent.

      • You should care MORE about the international “activities” of the world’s greatest imperialist Beast, that you live inside the belly of, than you do its domestic affairs. Narrow, short-sighted concern for “only White welfare” that overlooks crimes of imperialism is just what the system wants.

        • Wrong. Focused in-group preference on White interests is exactly what the System fears most. Your sympathy for downtrodden brown people will never be appreciated nor reciprocated by them.

  5. Why isn’t the joo york times talking bout the Palestinan genocide?! oh right I forgot because they are die hard Zionists and have had war mongers journalists on their editorial board. NyT despite being far left they very much still 100% zog thats why despite their Blumpf hate they haven’t written one article criticising his donors like Adelson and give Jared a column whenever he wants

    Ugyhur aren’t being genocided by Chinese but Palestinians are. The Chinese actually has a sizeable Muslim population. Alot don’t know this but it was actually Chinese Muslims who helped defeat genghis khan. China can be pretty based and redpilled sometimes but they are supposedly behind the systematic racism psy op bullshit to deflect criticism of corona

  6. I think that Cate Blanchette made Schlafly the only sympathetic character in the series of Mrs America. If only the conservative women actually looked and acted like that Ice Princess.

    I digress.

    The Chinese are well placed now. Maybe it’s time to move to Singapore or Macau or Hong Kong! At least these places appear to be well run.

  7. Whatever China’s many flaws, it’s a land of opportunity and fortune for the adventurous and enterprising White man right now.

  8. In the US you can criticize govt but you cant criticize, Israel, jews or make jokes about the holocaust. If you do ,the jew supremacists at the ADL will sic their ZOG proxies on you.

    • Say what you want about China and the chinks but they still have a healthy ethnostate free of diversity for the most part. I know their govt is communist but at least they put the the race of their people above the minority. The US and Europeans govt do the opposite.

      • The “communist” government of China is Chink supremacist but they think nothing of killing off millions of fellow Chinks if it benefits the State.

      • You do realize the Internationale is anti-racist, right? Read the lyrics.
        Official anthem of the Soviet Union until Stalin replace it with the much better Hymn to the Soviet Union. That is still Russia’s anthem, but with different lyrics. Vastly superior to the star spangled banner in sound.

      • I always pay attention to lyrics, the center and meaning of music, and drug, fornication and hate lyrics sicken me. That includes “adultery music” of Nashville, supposed to be “more wholesome” because it is “country.”

        I could never read Nietzsche at any length. I do not share his appreciation of “Dionysian” revelry,”the essence of which is the ecstatic dismembering of the god and of the Bacchantes’ rituals, of the inseparable ecstasy and suffering of human existence” as article you linked describes it.

        • By “appreciation” I do not mean participation. I know Nietzsche was a very restrained son of a minister, except for occasional trips to brothels “for men’s health reasons.”

          • Not being a party animal myself, I understand you; but I suspect, nevertheless, that Nietzsche was right about the Dionysian. Indeed, I have often thought the anti-Victorian onslaught of the ’60s—including the attackers’ main weapon, rock music—was a tremendous backlash, revenge almost, for Christianity’s millennium-plus suppression of the Dionysian. Dionysus, I have said to myself more than once, takes no prisoners. (On this subject, consult The Bacchae — )

            I’m reminded of the following, which is from Section 4 of “What I Owe to the Ancients,” the penultimate part of Nietzsche’s Twilight of the Idols:

            “I was the first to take seriously, for the understanding of the older, the still rich and even overflowing Hellenic instinct, that wonderful phenomenon which bears the name of Dionysus ….

            “[T]he concept ‘Greek’ which was developed by Winckelmann and Goethe [is] incompatible with that element out of which Dionysian art grows—the orgiastic. Indeed I do not doubt that as a matter of principle Goethe excluded anything of the sort from the possibilities of the Greek soul. CONSEQUENTLY GOETHE DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE GREEKS.” (Emphasis in the original)

            Well—if nothing else, anonymous, we non-party-animals are at least in the company of Goethe.

    • @ its, a mad,mad world world, i didnt hear or see moral purity, i just saw and heard statism complete, recycled anew for Another generation.

  9. At least the nature of power in these countries are more honest, nobody doubts that Xi isn’t really president, or the MBS isn’t really in charge of Saudi, or that in the past Henry 8 wasn’t the true ruler of England. Instead we are fooled with these marionettes on stage in DC that are just puppets of about 100 globalist billionaires, largely from NYC. I think the long term historical judgment on the US won’t be flowers and roses about the wonders of the flowery enlightenment rhetoric, rather that it ended up a failure because the set up a system that was so easily coopted. Worse, when they showed up here en masse around 1900 had this been run by a Henry Tudor type leader they would have been content to pay him off to keep them safe. But this “democracy” meant in order to be safe they had to co-op the entire electorate, ultimately leading to the plan to replace the electorate with a hodgepodge of disunited barbarian tribes. Meaning so called “democracy’s” fall was far more catastrophic that simply bringing a new King across the channel. Yep, America turned out to be a half baked idea and all the constitution fetishists like Mark Levin can try to explain why mass voting turns out to be a disaster in the long run.

Comments are closed.