When Integration Means Annihilation

Weddings are usually cause for celebration, and royal weddings are cause for national rejoicing. Even we colonials are fascinated by the British royal family. In 2014, when King Felipe VI succeeded his father Juan Carlos I of Spain, the crowds were puny compared to the commoners who rejoiced to see Prince William marry Kate Middleton. So many of us are children of the British Empire that when we say “the Crown,” we mean the British crown.

The monarchy is seductive, and there’s a temptation to defend it when leftists attack it. Thus, when Prince Harry married the divorced actress Meghan Markle in 2018, the glee many felt at the monarchy’s humiliation was painful. Al Sharpton called the wedding a blow against white supremacy. Black pundit Melissa Harris-Perry said it was an act of intentional subversion and the true end of the British Empire. The presiding cleric, the black “Episcopalian” Michael Curry, said we should “make of this old world a new world.”

The perennially hopeful thought is that integrating the royal family would help unite the United Kingdom. However, having ignored Enoch Powell and imported the American race problem, the British are learning that integration doesn’t strengthen an institution. It hollows it out and may even destroy it.

The very existence of an institution can be painful to non-whites, and with enough diversity, it becomes meaningless even to the people who created it. As Joe Sobran wrote in 1997, “Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost inexpressible.” He added that other races still feel subjugated even after the end of Western imperialism. Furthermore:

The white man presents an image of superiority even when he isn’t conscious of it. Superiority excites envy. Destroying white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of designated victims we call “minorities.”

When Meghan Markle married Prince Harry, the Crown granted the former Suitsactress the title “Duchess of Sussex.” This is an almost unimaginable honor for someone of her scandalous background. However, the Duchess now claims she had no idea what she was getting into and claims she hadn’t even looked into what the royal family was about before she agreed to marry Harry. After two years, the couple decided to renounce royal duties and move to America to be celebrities.

We’ve now seen embarrassing footage of Prince Harry negotiating with entertainment executives about his wife’s voiceover skills. The quasi-royal couple never concealed its disdain for Donald Trump. Last summer, the Duchess even supported ridiculous hate crime claims from 18-year-old Althea Bernstein, who said four “classic Wisconsin frat boys” tried to set her on fire. After an exhaustive investigation, the police closed the case, saying “the attack, as Bernstein had described it, had not occurred.” Hers was about as plausible as Jussie Smollett’s tall tale.

In the honor culture that the monarchy emerged from, strength, and duty justify power. In our modern culture, claims of victimhood are the path to power. Today, we’re seeing the conflict between victim culture and honor culture.

Queen Elizabeth II does her duty. She carries herself with quiet dignity. It’s her job. She never did anything to reverse the demographic transformation of her realm, but if she had, it might have meant the end of the monarchy. But if the sovereign can’t fight against the physical replacement of her people, there’s no point in having a sovereign. If she has failed, it’s because she held to her duty — never to take a political position — to the end.

Prince Harry’s approach has been different, but he doesn’t lack admirable qualities. He risked his life as a soldier for his country, and his partying and roguish behavior are modest by historic standards. Besides, it’s his older brother who is heir. Prince Harry had more freedom, but he had just one job: Don’t embarrass the family by talking politics.

He then married a woman who seems to treat the royal family as an ATM. The Duchess also understands that her (part) black skin privilege has more real power than any claim to nobility. She can call any criticism “racist” and rally journalists and fellow blacks to her defense. Prince Harry is now just some actress’s second husband.

Older forms of power are like the ritual of Trooping the Colour. The newer, more potent form of power was Meghan Markle (and her husband’s) interview with Oprah Winfrey. Miss Winfrey is another master at building power. Once a member of Jeremiah Wright’s radical congregation, she concealed her own racial grievances until her position was unassailable. Now, she lectures whites about unconscious racism and looks forward to generations of whites dying so that racism will finally end. A black billionaire used her massive platform to give a privileged mulatta a chance to claim she was a victim. Media power trumps royal prerogative.

The White House praised the “courage” the Markles showed by talking about their “struggles with mental health.” Well, what about the commoners? About 7 percent of British children have attempted suicide by 17, a rate that will probably increase because of COVID. In 2013, nine-year-old Aaron Dugmore reportedly killed himself  because he was bullied for being white. There was no national reckoning. A 2000 study found that blacks have higher self-esteem than whites, but “anti-racism” campaigners said this proves British society is even more racist than they realized. The Duchess’s pleas for sympathy get a much better hearing than cries for help from British whites.

The Duchess made several charges. She said a member of the royal family worried her son Archie might be too “dark.” Who said that? She wouldn’t say. And so what, anyway? She complained that the Palace will no longer provide security to the family. Why should it? The Duchess and her husband have quit their jobs. Meghan Markle said that she had “suicidal thoughts” but was discouraged from seeking mental health. A stiff upper lip was once an admirable British trait. Today, the best way to deal with pressure is to cry about it on television. Prince Harry chimed in to criticize his father, the future king, saying he “let down” his children.

Why would the couple make these charges, especially with elderly Prince Phillip at death’s door? Intentionally or not, they are creating an independent power base. Louis Phillippe II, Duke of Orleans, tried to curry favor with the French Revolution, even changing his name to “Phillippe Egalité.” Mrs. Markle’s strategy is working; #AbolishTheMonarchy was trending on Twitter after the interview. Labour MP and black woman Diane Abbot asked whether the royal family had learned anything in 25 years and demanded “serious reflection.” Thirteen centuries of duty and tradition may not be able to stand up to one hostile news cycle; the debacle will probably spur republican efforts in Australia and Canada.

The true irony is that this story really is about the privilege of a sacred bloodline. That bloodline is Meghan Markle’s black ancestry. A wealthy white woman complaining that the press is mean probably would win no praise. If Prince Harry had married a white woman and then left the royal family, I expect we’d be reading sneering articles about entitled “Karens.”  Mrs. Markle’s (light) black skin means that in intersectional politics, she can’t hold real power despite her fame, wealth, and title. The Duchess doesn’t enjoy the “white privilege” of a rag picker in northern England.

You can criticize the Queen even in the most vulgar terms and face no legal sanctions, but don’t criticize non-whites or you may be arrested. This shows what lèse-majesté really means.

If whites complain about dispossession or say they aren’t racist, it’s “white fragility,” but Meghan Markle’s sense of entitlement is heroic. One non-white columnist wrote: “Women of colour don’t owe England’s angry white men a damn thing. There’s barely one of us who didn’t get where she is today in spite of them.” She got it entirely wrong. Mrs. Markle owes her position to a white man who, before her, had an important place in an ancient British institution. After receiving this gift, she is contemptuous and resentful. And so we get the absurd spectacle of a black billionaire asking a half-black actress with a royal title who lives in a $14.5 million mansionabout how hard her life has been.

The affirmative-action aristocrat Meghan Markle is simply an example of a larger trend. When the black classicist Dan-el Padilla Peralta achieved a prominent position in his field — full professor at Princeton — he then called for the entire discipline to be abolished because it promotes “white supremacy.”  When non-whites joined the International Society of Anglo-Saxonists, they immediately set about “reforming” it and insisted that even its name was “racist” and had to be changed. When composer Nebal Maysaud became prominent in chamber music, he wrote a piece accusing classical music of being about “whiteness” and therefore “it’s time to let classical music die.” Michael Steele became the head of the Republican National Committee because, in the words of an American Conservative Union spokesperson, he was “a black guy.” Today, Michael Steele and other former black Republican “leaders” enjoy a steady rotation on cable news attacking the GOP for not welcoming blacks.

This is what happens when traditional intuitions are “integrated.” Non-whites welcomed with great fanfare turn on their benefactors. Joe Sobran is probably right. Blacks who suddenly “lead” something whites created can’t help thinking it’s foreign. They feel no duty or loyalty towards something their own people could never have built.

The foundations of monarchy are hierarchy and sacral order. Monarchy can’t pursue “equality” without destroying itself. Perhaps Prince Harry fancies himself another Phillippe Egalité, but he should remember that his democratic friends cut off his head in the end. If Harry had set in motion the abolition of the monarchy, there would be no reason to pay attention to Mr. Markle at all.

The Martyr of Equality, Behold the Progress of Our System, 1793, by Isaac Cruikshank

There is only one way to win the diversity game. Don’t play. You are racist no matter what you do. If you are a racist for keeping your institutions white, at least you still have institutions.

What of the Crown? I join with black Labour MP Diane Abbott in hoping the royals have learned some lessons, though not the same ones. I hope they have learned that affirmative-action aristocrats are poison. Diversity dilutes the Sovereign’s bond with her people. Royalty can’t compete with celebrities at being celebrities. The Sovereign — and everyone in her family — must be something more than celebrities. The Windsors must change, but not in order to “celebrate diversity.” They should rededicate themselves to their original purpose. Start by stripping Prince Harry of his title and letting him stay on as house husband to a voice actor. Don’t take him back when she leaves him — as she surely will.

The way forward is not modernization but Restoration. The Crown could become the unifying symbol of the Anglosphere by defending the Church of England, British culture, and the accomplishments of Anglo-Saxons everywhere. Andrew Fraser proposed such a solution in The WASP Question:

The monarchy must return to its original and still legitimate role as the voice of Anglo-Saxon history and Christian traditions; recovering WASPs [White Anglo-Saxon Protestants] around the world must pray for a Patriot King who, instead of abetting the divisions of his people . . . will endeavor to unite them, and to be himself the center of this union.

A post-Brexit United Kingdom could retain relevance by strengthening ties with the white nations it created, with the monarch as the unifying symbol. All whites, including non-Protestants or even non-Christians could take pride in this vision. Thomas Jefferson wasn’t much of a Christian, but had great pride in his Anglo-Saxon heritage and the founding stock. He even proposed the Germanic warriors Hengist and Horsa as the symbols on our national seal.

The Windsors are incapable of building such a monarchy. The palace will bunker down while the institution decays. I don’t think we have a stake in “saving” a monarchy that won’t save itself and serves no purpose beyond attracting tourists. The current ruling house proved its uselessness by letting the Markle wedding proceed.

If the Windsors are swept away as a result, conservatives, nationalists, and Traditionalists will no longer be blinded by nostalgia. Something new can be built. That’s better than slow-motion collapse presided over by a figurehead with no power or purpose.

First published on American Renaissance on March 9, 2021.

About Gregory Hood 43 Articles
Gregory Hood has been active in conservative groups in the US. He is a staff writer for American Renaissance. His work is syndicated on the Unz Review and here at Occidental Dissent.


  1. So the pedophile they continue to protect isn’t a problem but Megan is? Deal with Andrew, THEN lecture me about Megan.

    • Meghan is their Yoko. As odious and predicable as she is, you’re right that we shouldn’t forget how the Royals protected Andrew over his Epstein friendship.

    • What Pedophile? Did you get a look at that chick in the picture with the Prince? She wasn’t a kid, a generation or two ago sluts that age were fair game, pretty much the entire crop of groupies for rock stars in the 70s and 80s. Now the feminist prudes have redefined it as “pedophilia.” What Andrew did is show poor judgement by falling into that blackmail trap.

  2. I don’t believe the British royal family is worth defending, not the way they’ve acted. They done nothing while Britain is rapidly being turned into a third world shit hole. Like most of the upper classes in the U.S, they’ve cheerleaded for abortion and perversion. I hesitate to say that people I don’t know are evil, but they seem to be immoral and perverse. They’re so far removed from reality that you wonder what planet they’ve flown them in from.

    If they had anything to them, they would have come right out and said that someone who is a direct line to the throne should not marry a woman with black blood. Someone like Megan Markel should never have been allowed to live in the U.K in the first place, this shows how far downhill they gone and just how fucked up Britain is.

  3. Delusional, Mr. Hood.
    “So many of us are children of the British Empire ” Nope, to a large extent Jewish social engineering products.
    Only mongoloids care about ‘royal” weddings

    “Anglo-Saxons” are largely Celtic R1b haplogroup. I could also call myself “Ostrogoth” but I’m not silly.

    The “British Empire” was a Jewish money-gathering enterprise, centered in the “City” in London where that little German trolll aka the “Queen” must request permission to enter to this day. It was crime syndicate model similar to Venice not Rome, the difference that in Venice ruled Venetians not Jews.

    I could go on but I’m late

    • Not so.

      White settlers is the main pattern of Anglosaxon imperialism. The colonies founded from New Zealand, Australia, Cape Colony, The American seaboard, Canada were designed as places for whites people to move to and populate.

      The Suez and India had a different pattern but the distinctiveness of the Empire is the white dominion.

  4. “Prince Harry’s approach has been different, but he doesn’t lack admirable qualities. He risked his life as a soldier for his country”

    Harry complained that he wasn’t allowed to use his military training, he was always left at the base. The British Government wouldn’t let him go into battle, because it would be politically damaging for the world to see a captured Royal on his knees, getting his head cut off in a Taliban propaganda video.

  5. The royal family loves “Diversity”. The queen is fully committed to selling out her own people to it. The royals are getting exactly what they deserve.

    • Agree. The queen could have disproved of Harry’s choice of a wife. Instead, they were too worried about appearances.
      Harry could have had his choice of almost any respectable, virgin woman in the UK. He could have married a young white girl and had a lot of children.

  6. I cringed when I saw that wedding that looked like the Blues Brother’s visit to the Reverend Cleophus James Church.

  7. There’s something wrong with British royalty. They always choose the worst women.

    Wallis Simpson: old, ugly washed up divorced slut

    Diana: race mixer, party slut

    Kate Middleton: hard drinking party slut

    Markel: old divorced mulatto slut

    Literal royalty who could have their pick of decent women, but they’re all scraping the bottom of the barrel. Britain is cursed.

    • Diana didn’t become a racemixing slut until after her husband and the entire royal family treated her like shit. Indeed, she was chosen to be the wife of the next King because she had a reputation as a virgin and a generally well behaved girl.

      • If a woman’s response to being treated poorly (or falsely perceiving that she is being treated poorly, which is more often the case with women) is to become a race mixing slut, then she was trash from the start.

        The Brits are probably cursed because John Dee initiated the royalty into kabbalah.

      • Nah she was chosen because the Spencer family own most of the land that London is built upon. William stands to inherit most of that land. Very likely that the Earl had her killed to reduce the number of claimants on the land. If she had a child with Fayed that child could have made claims on the Spencer properties in probate courts.

        • I had never heard that much of London is built on Spencer-owned land. I do think that Diana’s death really was just a car crash caused by a drunk driver.

          If someone wanted to prevent a Fayed child from making claims on the Spencer properties in London, well, it didn’t work, because apparently there’s a lot of Moslems and/or Arabs already in that happy condition.

  8. Polls have shown that the split on thinking that Duchess Hafrican is a victim of raycissm(liberals, self-loathing Whites)/she’s a typical uppity negress who is never satisfied with anything she is given(conservatives) is strictly down political lines.

  9. Some of us have had religious teachers who forbad interracial marriage. I was taught that it is not Biblical and one of my ministers refused to conduct a marriage ceremony for a couple if the man and woman (gender confusion not tolerated) were not of the same race. And he basically said that integration is of Satan and segregation is of God. (He condemned the Civil Rights Movement back in the 1950s and 1960s.)

    The Truth just sort of becomes evident for all to see and some people just have to learn the hard way.

    Preserve your race, history, heritage, etc. The PC crowd, Big Tech, Big Media, Big Marxists, Big Commies, Big Anarchists, Big Lies and Liars, etc sure won’t…

    • Whatever you believe, race-mixing is a crime. On one hand, it destroys the separate races of man that God created. Or if you believe in Evolution, it can obliterate recessive genes and destroy speciation. It is de-volution. Any foolish White with recessive traits such as Harry, throwing away his genes like that is a loss. He could have had his pick of any red-headed English Rose.

  10. Our willingness, in The South, to give up ourselves and allow ourselves to be incorporated into everyone else’s schemes has been our undoing – not just ours but that of the Southern Negro Community, as well.

    I learned this lesson as a very young man with women – never give up yourself or pretend to be what you are not, in order to get along in a relationship.

    Better to be disliked, alone, and, if need be, perilously embattled.

  11. “””.. Something new can be built….”””

    No they can`t . They won the Nazis. Fighting Nazism is their religion, culture and identity now and they go down defending it.

  12. That’s an interesting idea about the British Monarchy becoming like the Aga Khan. I like the basic idea. King of a vast racial Tribe. Maybe Charles should give it a thought.

    Riots coming after lockdown ends and weather improves. Labour are organising strikes.

  13. Here, here. Excellent article.

    I can’t help but wonder if Meghan isn’t some huge demoralization psy-op though. Clearly the crown could easily heal Britain of it’s nigger problem, but they choose not to.

  14. Insufferably uppity nigger destroyers like “Duchess” Mulatto, sow Oprah, Abbott, ad nauseam would not exist without the god damned kikes promoting & protecting them (of course Taylor & Co. would rather die than mention THAT) – or without the lack of foresight, weakness & cowardice of White elites like the Royals. Ol’ Liz didn’t even have the guts to keep one nigger whore out of her own familial woodpile, let alone keep them out of the White Anglo-Saxon nation she inherited. Despite living a personally decent, scandal-free life, she is an abject, catastrophic failure on the one issue that really mattered.

    “Why, One simply cannot mention race, or the need to keep the realm White. We defeated that rotter Hitler to end that sort of thing. Besides – the jews would scream before One could say ‘knife’…”

    Sadly, “Great” Britain has been a giant, steaming dog turd since at least that drunken war-monger scum Churchill. Well, really since the Puritan asshole usurper Cromwell let his beloved “Elder Brothers in the Faith” slither back in after that model monarch Edward I kicked their hairy asses out.

  15. The British Royal Family is the only reason people need to never support hereditary monarchies.

  16. Obviously, no one here knows who or what is above the monarchs. When someone says “All Road Leave to Rome”, believe them. Dive deep. Unfortunately, it’s still not the top.

  17. Now with the Piers Morgan controversy it’s easy to see Britian split along racial lines as supporting or disliking Markle. Note the immigrant in the newsroom attacked Morgan for not believing her concocted story? It’s clear Markle became homesick for Hollywood and the dolt Harry either wants to hang around that crowd too, or was too weak to leave her and went along too. Now they have to explain their dereliction of duty and what better way to play the race card.

    With all the blacks and arabs in England taking Markle’s side I hope the Royal Family is paying attention, the non-whites squatting there hate them. Sort of like the hatred bile outpouring against Amanda Knox during that complete hoax of a prosecution. It was all these hindus and other foreigners in England leading the internet campaign against her. For those not in the know, her roommate at the Italian University was a half Indian from England and a local African burglar with a record raped and murdered her in a botched burglary. Instead of waiting for the evidence, the local quack prosecutor who hates Americans, put Knox through an all night interrogation and got a bunch of confusing statements when they told her to “imagine an African bar owner committing the murder” and then concocted a fraudulent prosecution, refusing to budge when the actual perpetrator was discovered. They knew it was a black who did it and tried to get her to frame a local black bar owner who had nothing to do with it. Once the tabloids jumped in and concocted bizarre “Sharron Stone in Basic Instinct” orgy type scenarios instead of the mundane home invasion that it was all the minorities in England blasted in online to spew their hatred of white girls. The vitriol was horrible, their hoax case was so obviously not based in reality but it didn’t matter, it was an excuse to let it all out against Americans and Whites. Minorities over there are just as bitter as the ones here, why else did BLM pop up in England for chrissake?

    • Yes, with all of the privileges and free money they get, the “minorities” are not satisfied, just like in the US. The biracial weatherman was out of line, “scolding” Morgan right on the air. He knew he had the race card insurance and was allowed to be arrogant. The current thing is for nonwhites to put us in our place.

Comments are closed.