CNN: “Biological Sex” At Birth Is A Misleading Way Of Describing The Human Body

Speaking of a Big Lie …

We wouldn’t want to “misgender” newborns.

After discovering hard evidence that the White race is a social construct which has no biological basis, progressive activists have recently discovered at least 20,000 new genders over the past decade.


“Though the two executive orders signed by Noem do not explicitly mention transgender athletes, they ?reference the supposed harms of the participation of “males” in women’s athletics — an echo of the transphobic claim, cited in other similar legislative initiatives, that transgender women are not women. The orders also reference “biological sex,” a disputed term that refers to the sex as listed on students’ original birth certificates.

It’s not possible to know a person’s gender identity at birth, and for some people, the sex listed on their original birth certificate is a misleading way of describing the body they have.

While sex is a category that refers broadly to physiology, a person’s gender is an innate sense of identity. The factors that go into determining the sex listed on a person’s birth certificate may include anatomy, genetics and hormones, and there is broad natural variation in each of these categories. For this reason, the language of “biological sex,” as used in this legislation, can be overly simplistic and misleading. …”

These people are crackpots who live in a make believe fantasy world. Insofar as “science” is invoked to justify this nonsense, it should make people far more skeptical of the climate inside academia. If you are stupid enough to believe this shit, you will believe anything.

About Hunter Wallace 12366 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent


  1. CNN and the rest of the judeo infotainment media have lost almost all of their normal audience, so in a last desperate attempt to remain relevant they have gone “woke”. Hence all of these retarded stories about fags, trannies and perpetually aggrieved colored people.

  2. Liberals enjoy using this fallacy where they point to outliers and exceptional cases, believing it invalidates entire categories or larger statistical distributions. Not sure if this fallacy has a name, but they use it all the time.

    They point to the very small number of people who are born with deformed genetalia or intersex to claim that biological sex is meaningless (while at the same time claiming that “gender” is essential and innate to a person). They point to the high IQ black person and believe it refutes race differences. They point to the high testosterone competitive female executive and believe this refutes the fact that most women are not suitable for or happy in such roles.

      • More like ‘f*cked in the SOUL’. This IS the modern equivalent of Sodom and Gomorrah, and it WILL be destroyed. God is not mocked. Because if this stinks in our nostrils, IMAGINE how God feels!

  3. Ironically, or not, this stuff involves a lot of confusion between “sex” and “gender.” In humans there are two sexes, male and female. A woman is an adult female, a girl is a female child.

    Gender is a fuzzier concept but also not that difficult to understand. First of all, “gender” usually refers to language; in many languages, the Romance languages and others, nouns can have a gender, usually masculine, feminine, and neuter.

    In human culture, we sometimes refer to “gender roles” and gender roles are to an extent artificially constructed – a skirt is feminine attire, except in Scotland where a skirt is called a kilt and it is a masculine garment. But these gender roles are only partially constructed, as they are based on biology. We typically consider “child care” a female gender role, based on biology – women make the babies and only women can nurse them. So obviously, it is “natural” that mommy takes care of the baby.

    Human males are larger, stronger, and more violent and aggressive than females. So the military and fighting are typically considered masculine roles. It is not that women can’t fight, but obviously they are at a disadvantage.

    Really this is stuff that a first grader typically understands quite easily.

    In the case of these “transgenders” it is simply middle aged men with a weird sexual fetish called “autogynophilia” and they get the same sexual thrill of having people see them in women’s clothing that exhibitionists get by exposing themselves on the bus.

    As for the parents of “trans kids” – this is also nothing new. There have been long been horror stories of crazy mothers forcing their sons to wear dresses because they really wanted a daughter, and in 2003 there was a critical acclaimed film titled “Osama” about an Afghani girl whose mother dresses her up like a boy so she can get an education.

    These parents are just engaging in the same kind of child abuse Chinese parents engaged in during the foot-binding years – physically injuring your children for social prestige. In pre-civilization times they used to literally sacrifice their infants to some volcano god.

    Again, nothing new, this shit is old hat.

    • All this stuff falls under the rubric of “radical sexual autonomy” and serves the self-annihilating agenda of the “sexual r/evolution.”

      If the aim is to destroy the perpetuation of the white race then the memes available are innumerable for those acting out the societal transgressions which break the bonds and shatter the unions inherent to a fledging new family.

      Ultimately, with the desire for “radical sexual autonomy,” there is not to be any viable union. So, it is this in the blackened heart of the trans-movement a permanently broken bond with society.

  4. We are living in an age of complete and utter insanity. I notice a lot of this is being perpetuated by women.

    • “Nothing is real. Except White supremacy.”

      You know why, don’t you? Because the West once held to Christian Platonism- the idea (corroborated in Scripture) that the ‘forms’ of this life, are merely ‘ikons’ of the REAL Forms, that exist truly- REALLY, ‘behind the veil.’

      As God created Adam (i.e., the White/Caucasoid/European race) as HIS ikon and likeness. So, when you see the White Man, you see God’s own Ikon. Which is why Christ is a White Man. And, that idea, that consistent philosophical truism, has been valid, since the time of the Ancient Greeks. it remains the ONLY VALID image of the ‘heavenlies’- which is why the Evil Ones of this plane, want to genocide it/us/Christ.

      It’s all so readily apparent, once you study Plato, or read Lewis and/or Tolkien.
      Our mechanistic, fluid society is the negation of everything that is ontologically REAL.
      And it’s either them…. or us. I prefer that THEY be destroyed, TYVM.

Comments are closed.