Gwen Berry: National Anthem “Disrespects” Black People

35 Comments

1. No matter what is done for Blacks and jews by Whites it never enough – they are selfish, petulant children that never mature into adulthood.

2. The melody is an old English pub song though.

3. The appeals courts released Bill Rapey Cosby. Legal system is just a money transfer from the goys to the Jews who run the bar.

   • Cap’n… is it? Read Anglin’s take on this. I don’t care if Bill can’t keep his zipper closed, but he WAS telling his Nig-bors to keep it real, and then he got ‘me too-ed’ two weeks before the statute of limitations was to expire? Sounds like a set up… but by who?

     Maybe, like Michael Jackson, who wrote:

     “…“Jew me, sue me, everybody do me’ and “Kick me, kike me, don’t you black or white me,? Jackson sings on the song “They Don’t Care About Us.?

     – the best exemplars of this sorry race are just that: imperfect specimens of their own sorry tribe. But if they point out the jew, then they are Useful Toms for our cause.

     • @Fr+ – Oh. yes , we all know black men rarely rape! Especially entitled magic americans like Bill Cosby. By many accounts of those who dealt directly with him he was an insufferable jackass with a hyper-inflated ego. If you think blacks are ever going to be “useful” to Whites you are delusional.

       • Old enough- If you are a woman, I can understand your frustration. But really, you are the chattel of your husband or your father. End of story.

         Equality among the sexes,does not exist.
         That’s why Bruce Jenner is getting all the publicity – because at base, he’s still a man. And it’s that male” in your face-ness,” that is the problem – esp. when he decides he’s going to be a “woman.”

         “For Eve sinned first and then Adam.”
         So, with this insight, yes. Black males are important to society, especially when they call their own race’smale gender to task. (Read the Anglin article, hon….)

         Because, in the ontology of the United States, first it was white men that were given the (voting) franchise;, then it was black men; then it was women -and it took almost 200 years to get to that last part. If you are a woman, you are on the bottom of the totem pole. Because God. Because Bible. Because Christendom. Because western civilization.

         Patriarchy is the only valid and biblical solution to the crime of rape. But you don’t want that, especially if you’re a feminist, or a woman.
         Because you still believe in the fallacy, that you are our equal.

         Now, if you are a man… And yet you still believe in the equality of the sexes, well then you’re nothing but an ideological soy boy, or a faggot wannabe.

         I’m done with either idiocy. Have a nice day, dear.

         • Father John,

           I grant that women are under the rule of men to a certain extent. We are also supposed to be under our parent’s rule while living at home and our husbands when we marry but are we chattel?

           I have made better grades in school my whole life than any guy except in math related courses. It is impossible for me to feel inferior inherently to a male intellectually but only bow to male authority because it is the will of God. Even the mantilla we wear in Church is a symbol of submission.

           As for rape? Only sick cowards rape women. Murder is barbaric, theft is greed but rape is perversion. As a general rule a rapist should die but only after knives have been used on him.

           No. I do not believe in sexual equality. Therefore if we are under male rule are we not only under your protection and deserving of special consideration even while men have superior privileges and more obligations?

4. America is in it’s death throes.

   A nation gripped by madness.

   • Gripped by Jews is probably more accurate.

   • It is no longer a nation. That is why it is dying.

5. Blacks aren’t really Americans. Justice demands they all be deported back to Africa.

   • The very conclusion we reached in 1865. Isn’t it about time to give Africa, her ‘reparations’ back?

     This product from the Dark Continent expired a century ago, and all it does now, is stink.
     (More than usual)

     ““The insensate greed of our ancestors [ oh, and the Jewish slave ship owners- Fr. J] took this simple folk from their dark land and placed them in our fields and by our firesides. Here they have multiplied to millions, and have been forced without training into the duties of a citizenship that often puzzles the brains of those who were trained by their ancestry to a sense of its obligations.”

     By N. S. Shaler

     (Quoted in an Atlantic article- see, even as they deny the reality, the confirm it, by quoting ‘haters’ and ‘racists’… all the while praying the mantra of JEWS Noel Ignatiev and Susan Sonntag, ‘The White Race is the cancer of Humanity.”

     Yeah. Cry me a river. Then leave. RAPIDO.

     • ‘Twas consensus long before 1865. George Washington signed Naturalization Act of 1790:«any alien, being a free white person…may be admitted to become a citizen thereof» White racial restriction re-affirmed in Naturalization Act of 1795; Naturalization Act of 1798 signed by John Adams; Naturalization Act of 1802 signed by Thomas Jefferson—who in 1821 also wrote in his Autobiography:
       «Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them. It is still in our power to direct the process of emancipation and deportation peaceably and in such slow degree as that the evil will wear off insensibly, and their place be pari passu filled up by free white laborers. If on the contrary it is left to force itself on, human nature must shudder at the prospect held up. We should in vain look for an example in the Spanish deportation or deletion of the Moors. This precedent would fall far short of our case.»

       Founding generation consensus not disturbed ’til 14th Am. and Grant signing Naturalization Act of 1870 opening citizenship to «aliens of African nativity and persons of African descent» (though still excluding other nonwhite races).

       The issue taken to U.S. Supreme Court where now-maligned Chief Justice Roger B. Taney authored 7-2 opinion in 1857, expressing not his personal views—merely adhering to Anglo-American jurisprudence in determining whether Founders intended blacks to be American citizens—for which he is now viciously attacked.

       House just voted to remove bust of Justice Taney with Confederate statues, though the Marylander—first Catholic Chief Justice of U.S. Supreme Court, appointed by Andrew Jackson in 1835—was 84-yrs-old in 1861 and never quit SCOTUS to join CSA. They can’t say he was a “traitor”; his only ‘crime’ is “racism”. (Taney also ruled Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus unconstitutional in case Ex parte Merryman, but Lincoln ignored ruling.)
       _____________________________________________
       Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
       «Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.
       The question is simply this: can a negro whose ancestors were imported into this country and sold as slaves become a member of the political community formed and brought into existence by the Constitution of the United States, and as such become entitled to all the rights, and privileges, and immunities, guarantied by that instrument to the citizen, one of which rights is the privilege of suing in a court of the United States in the cases specified in the Constitution?
       …
       The words “people of the United States” and “citizens” are synonymous terms, and mean the same thing. They both describe the political body who, according to our republican institutions, form the sovereignty and who hold the power and conduct the Government through their representatives. They are what we familiarly call the “sovereign people,” and every citizen is one of this people, and a constituent member of this sovereignty. The question before us is whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement compose a portion of this people, and are constituent members of this sovereignty?

       We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word “citizens” in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States. On the contrary, they were at that time considered as a subordinate and inferior class of beings who had been subjugated by the dominant race, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained subject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges but such as those who held the power and the Government might choose to grant them.

       It is not the province of the court to decide upon the justice or injustice, the policy or impolicy, of these laws. The decision of that question belonged to the political or lawmaking power, to those who formed the sovereignty and framed the Constitution. The duty of the court is to interpret the instrument they have framed with the best lights we can obtain on the subject, and to administer it as we find it, according to its true intent and meaning when it was adopted.
       …
       In the opinion of the court, the legislation and histories of the times, and the language used in the Declaration of Independence, show that neither the class of persons who had been imported as slaves nor their descendants, whether they had become free or not, were then acknowledged as a part of the people, nor intended to be included in the general words used in that memorable instrument.

       It is difficult at this day to realize the state of public opinion in relation to that unfortunate race which prevailed in the civilized and enlightened portions of the world at the time of the Declaration of Independence and when the Constitution of the United States was framed and adopted. But the public history of every European nation displays it in a manner too plain to be mistaken.

       They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race either in social or political relations, and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect, and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold, and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic whenever a profit could be made by it. This opinion was at that time fixed and universal in the civilized portion of the white race. It was regarded as an axiom in morals as well as in politics which no one thought of disputing or supposed to be open to dispute, and men in every grade and position in society daily and habitually acted upon it in their private pursuits, as well as in matters of public concern, without doubting for a moment the correctness of this opinion.
       …
       We refer to these historical facts for the purpose of showing the fixed opinions concerning that race upon which the statesmen of that day spoke and acted. It is necessary to do this in order to determine whether the general terms used in the Constitution of the United States as to the rights of man and the rights of the people was intended to include them, or to give to them or their posterity the benefit of any of its provisions.
       …
       No one of that race had ever migrated to the United States voluntarily; all of them had been brought here as articles of merchandise. The number that had been emancipated at that time were but few in comparison with those held in slavery, and they were identified in the public mind with the race to which they belonged, and regarded as a part of the slave population rather than the free. It is obvious that they were not even in the minds of the framers of the Constitution when they were conferring special rights and privileges upon the citizens of a State in every other part of the Union.

       Indeed, when we look to the condition of this race in the several States at the time, it is impossible to believe that these rights and privileges were intended to be extended to them.»

   • Wow you are generous. I think their fate is to starve to death here tho. I’m guessing 60% of whites will join them. Nasty times ahead for sure.

     • I respectfully disagree. Their fate is to be wiped out by the indigenous Meso-American/Caucasian hybrids that the White Democrats are importing.

       Just as Blacks were pushed out to Oakland after they were ethno-racially cleansed by “Latinx” gangs from the Watts and Compton neighborhoods in Los Angeles, so these newer “Latinx” imports will be moving into Black areas and pushing them out.

       Between the “Latinx” gangs and the fact that the leading cause of murder to young Blacks are other young Blacks, I don’t see Blacks as much of an issue ten or twenty years from now. That is as long as stupid White Republicans don’t win office and then come up with programs that end up saving them from their own stupidity.

       Luckily we have Democrats who will foil them by accusing them of racism if they harp too much on law and order. Yeah, you may ask me, and how will that benefit Whites if we end up in a Mad Max World.

       Here are my predictions:

       Don’t believe all the fear-mongering over “Defund the Police.” If you live in the suburbs in reasonably secure communities, the costs of policing will simply be shifted to your Home Association Fees. Your Neighborhood Association will simply install fences and gates with little guard shacks which will be staffed by armed, private security who will also patrol and police your neighborhood. Because they are private security and not answerable to any Soros politician the idiot populace may accidentally put into office, if some idiot earns his Darwin Award by getting stupid, neither the private security company nor those who hired them can be held accountable – as they are not public officers.

       Why do you think The Squad hired their own armed private security, despite having the Capitol Police and the whole National Guard protecting their silly behinds from so many of us Eville White Supreeemacissssts? Because they have much greater latitude and less liability than public officers.

       The next big scare theme is “Federal Policing.” The idea is that FEDGOV interferes with and ties the hands of the local police until they are largely ineffective and/or fired and/or resign en masse.
       They do that, too, but that is not the long-term goal. Again with “Defund the Police,” you must think of how/where those funds will be re-allocated.

       When Flint and Detroit, MI had to defund their police, and it got so bad that even the worse left living there wanted some form of law and order restored, the state took over policing these cities. They became the jurisdiction of the country sheriffs and the DPS department.

       So, if the police are defunded in the city where you live and you can’t afford to live in a neighborhood that hires its own private police force, then when you dial 911, the LEO who answers your call will either be from your sheriff’s office or DPS. But not for long, because that shifts the onus of liability onto those departments staffed as they are with public officers.

       What will then happen is a greatly expanded federal marshal program, like back in the days when most of the current western states were still territories. So if a Salem, Oregon or a Portland, Washington goes bonkers a detail from Alabama will be flown in to restore order. Most likely they will be garrisoned at outlying hotels.

       Older posters may remember that this is precisely how the USSR handled any issues within Soviet bloc. So, if one of their bloc or satellite countries got too uppity and their puppets couldn’t put it down, they would send in troops from the bloc countries with which the out-of-control country got along with the least and order would be quickly restored.

       In the meantime, find alternative back up hacks besides your guns for “home defense.” Just as an ounce of prevention prevents a pound of cure. Extra fortified locks on the doors and the gates of a modest,unassuming house is worth a ton in lawyer fees and police investigations over the death of the jogger you killed when you found him on your property.

   • Re: “Blacks aren’t really Americans. Justice demands they all be deported back to Africa”:

     (1) What are “Americans”? Even the Caucasian portion of the multi-ethnic U.S. population is not an ethnicity.

     (2) “Justice” demands that even when they live in Africa, the Empire will not let them alone. The Empire will not let HAITI alone either, hence the removal of Aristide and banning of the socialist Lavalas party. Every penny that Haiti can be drained of is taken, not a conspiracy but just how capitalism naturally works. Because Fanmi Lavalas could not be allowed to raise the sweatshops’ hourly wage ten cents per hour, and genuine ethno-national socialism cannot be allowed in Africa or in the Western hemisphere:

     • If you have to deny the white Caucasian Anglo-Saxon base of this country as not having an “ethnicity,” then you’re either damn dumb or, you’ve been drinking the Kool-Aid.

       Either way you’re a fool- per Proverbs.

       • But I DON’T the English ethniicity of the base of the British colonies that became the U.S., or the Welsh ethnicity of the base of “New Wales” (Penn’s colony) or the German-Swiss ethnicity of some parts of Pennsylvania or the Scots-Ulster Irish base of Appalachian “Pennsyltucky,” et cetera. However there is no such thing, yet, as an American ethnicity.

6. And still blacks have no power, no power to effect change on their own without the help of others. Sure they have it good but not of their own efforts and struggles. It is high times blacks accept Christ and learn how to forgive and forget, but the people who made blacks what they are won’t let them forgive and forget and won’t let us either.

   • I’m going off on a tangent but my take on this is that there is a small muslim ruling class in West Africa that is actually quite capable.

     • And the Igbos? https://www.theafricantimes.com/2021/06/the-igbo-people-of-nigeria-jews-of-africa/ “Most of the slave rebellions in the United States, Haiti, Jamaica, Belize, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados and Guyana were led by Igbo slaves. In South Carolina, Igbo slaves were reported to have drowned themselves, rather than be kept as slaves (…) The Gullahs are Igbo. Igbos were one of the 13 African ethnic groups that provided the bulk of the slaves who were brought to the Americas. Majority of the slaves who ended up in Virginia, Alabama, Tennessee, Maryland, Arkansas, Mississippi, South and North Carolina and Georgia were Igbo. An Igbo museum has been built in Virginia to honor the contribution of Igbo slaves to the state. One of the Igbo slaves who was sent to Liberia by the American Colonization Society-Edward Roye- became the fourth president of Liberia. Another Igbo slave, Olaiduah Equiano wrote the famous slave chronicles. During the colonial period, the British disliked the Igbos, because of their supposedly uppitiness and argumentativeness. During military service in Burma and India, the pride of Igbo soldiers amongst other African soldiers was proverbial…”

7. Grant them 1000 demands and they’ll have 1000 more. That’s the kind of enemy we have.

8. The more I read this stuff or watch another black commit crime or watch another town or city turn to crap, I get interested and jealous of 30 something Andrew Henderson of the site: Nomad Capitalist, who left America and is living large. Unfortunately America does not offer the best any longer. Too much diversity and a hell bent heavily jewish media and social media make sure of that.

   America peaked probably around 70 years ago. It’s been a slow drop since picking up speed of late. But hey I’m just a White boy who did not realize his whole life is dedicated to making sure blacks are forever ego massaged.

   • I think “America” peaked about 1890. This was when county fairs were about at their peak. I think people from that period would be horrified to see how things are today.

9. You couldn’t please these people with a years supply of free beer, a three month holiday or gift card for a massage parlour. We will NEVER please them!
   Treat them differently……….. waysist.
   Treat them the same…….waysist.
   Give them special treatment…….waysist.
   Treat them just like us………. totally waysist!
   The money spent on these useless wretches could have taken us to Mars years ago.
   If she competes against a Russian……. I’ll cheer for the Russian!

   • 100% Goose. I don’t ” cheer” for American athletes like I used to. These days it’s a black with a crazy glued for life ” chip” on his/her shoulder, knee takers or some lesbians with pink or blue hair waving or wearing the nauseating rainbow insignia. I would not cheer for this woman if she ran a potato sack race against a 400 pounder from Fiji.

     On top of it blacks are insanely pushed and promoted if they have yet another( yaaawwwnnn) racial grievance. The media even prods the black athletes to have a racial grievance like that short chick who jumps around. Forgot her name now.

     It’s why I have cut back on sports watching dramatically. The same for tv shows and movies. Basically less American influence is a good thing these days. European, South American and Asian shows are generally more interesting to watch now over American foul mouthed, anti White and anti police shows with black and female super hero types. Lol. Pathetic. The Jews who run it are never targeted for disproportionate influence or needing to share the jobs with the goy. Same old song..

     • @Jeff
       They thrive on division and victimhood, even when none exists in their particular circumstances.
       Whites are terrible enough for them to bitch about, but suprise, suprise……….not terrible enough for them to run to Africa to get away from.
       When negroes in Africa have problems in their country, they try to escape from that country.
       When they have problems in the West……….they don’t run away, but riot, protest, play the victim, endeavour to get laws changed, etc.
       This athlete ‘victim’ has more money than you and I……..and only by playing some useless sport.

       • Goose. Yup, totally agree. I used to be a sports junkie with baseball and football in particular. First the obscene salaries paid to players and the costs to go to a game really turned me off. But the hammer dropped when all sports got in bed with the Blm and Antifa terrorists. Now, I feel ill even flipping by a sports channel with the fake announcers, 24/7 pandering to gays, blacks, browns, etc. Disgusting old men billionaire owners still afraid to have a spine.

         There really are too many dumb, slobbering Whites though. Blacks are 100% committed to all things black. You know exactly how they will vote. Stupid Whites are so pandering and divided. Look at all these White mutants joining Blm and Antifa or who push homosexual everything.

         I am really not sure if America comes back. We have had so many traitors over the years promoted as heroic that it’s staggering. Look at a guy like Sharpton. The guy is an ignorant pig made rich by White people with his own Tv show. Look at Jewish Hollywood and the filth promoted for decades. Look at our tv and print media. Espn? I can go on forever.

         I still do love America but as I age and see the garbage this country is morphing into, I question if I have the dedication to here any longer. As we were saying I don’t even cheer for American athletes any longer with some exceptions. I certainly do not cheer the Democratic Party in particular and loved when Putin was poking fun at Biden. I love when foreign leaders trash American hypocrisy or rip what our cities have turned into.

         America is certainly not an ” A” level country any longer. Look at the hoops people have to jump through just to own a home now. As it says on the Nomad Capitalist website- “Go where you’re treated best.” Boy, that means a lot now.

10. No one will ever mention the fact that the 1790 Naturalization Act was put in place so that negros would never become citizens. “That any alien, being a free WHITE person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States , for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof….”

    This country doesn’t belong to negros and it would be best for both races if we had amicable separation. Blacks today should be thankful we are committing civilizational suicide by accepting them and they honestly should work towards respecting us as the dominant class in the country that our own forefathers built.

    It was White Anglo-Saxon Protestants such as myself who built this country, not negros.

11. I don’t care about this ugly piece of shit.

    Being good at throwing a hammer is about the apex of her races accomplishments in the history of upright walking apes, and even then she only got bronze, losing to two White women.

    None of it qualifies her to tell me anything. Just another badly behaved coon.

    Let her act like an ass, it does our work for us.

12. “You must never give the Negro any fame, wealth or power, because they cannot handle it. They must remain in a permanent state of humility and servitude, otherwise they WILL get uppity.”

    – Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, 1967

13. The only Negro athlete I can think of who was polite and civilized was Jesse Owens. He became good friends with fellow Olympic athlete Luz Long, German hero who was later killed in combat defending the Reich in WWII.

    • Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t Jesse Owens start all of this protesting at the Olympics in Mexico by giving the Black Power Salute while he was on the podium receiving his medal?

      • You’re off by 32 years. Different guy.

14. No matter how much you give the negro or what you do from them, it will never be enough. They will always demand more and the jew will always be there egging them on.