I’m old enough to remember when we were told that “marriage equality” wasn’t a slippery slope. Now that the whip is in the other hand, they are singing a different tune.
Note: Hillary is correct that this is about more than a “woman’s right to choose.” At one level, it is about who should decide these matters. At another deeper level, it is about the Self and personal autonomy. Should we regulate female sexuality in the interests of society or leave it up to the free market? What are the limits and boundaries of liberalism? Assuming there are any?
Hillary is a champion of wymmins, except those who were sexually assaulted by her sociopathic husband.
The Manson Family and the Clintons. TYPICAL BOOMERS.
“a champion of wymmins, except those who were sexually assaulted by her sociopathic husband”:
She loves the women just like she loves the Haitian people. Look up Clinton Foundation in Haiti, Tony Rodham’s Haitian gold mine, and her husband’s coup and forced privatisation policies there. As the Bible says “The love of money is the root of all this evil.”
The danger of democracy vs legislating from the bench.
All of these culture wars are about the freedom of elites from christianity.
Looking at that visage, I am reminded of the Bible verse that goes, ‘Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.”
Knowhatimsayin’?
“‘”…or leave it up to the free market?….”””
Values and human rights are not commodities. Human rights are invented and enforced by small group on nonelected activists.
Normie only does what is norm . Small group of nonelected activists must invent the norms and made them mandatory.
There is no equal rights in the war. Even we win or enemy wins. Our most wet dreams must become values, science, human rights and so on . Moral high ground is up to grab and our side must grab it.
Call me when these same “women’s rights” advocates support outlawing infant genital mutilation.
I think Hillary’s husband should put his dick onto a Jewish girl’s mouth…
Women’s right to choose is a farce, it’s about keeping women slaves to the govt and making decisions for them by using propaganda as it’s their right to abort their offspring.
You can believe that legal abortion with limits is good policy and still believe Roe v. Wade is bad law. Why is this nuance so hard?
I don’t know why they keep dragging this old loser out to give her opinion on random issues. Nobody cares. Everyone hates her. Even most Hill shills who voted for her in 2016 hate her for losing what should have been an easy race against Drump.
Why isn’t Monica’s blue dress with Bill’s love juice stains hanging up on the wall too? This picture could be next to it:
https://news.artnet.com/art-world/bill-clinton-blue-dress-painting-jeffrey-epstein-1628437
She looks scarier the older she gets. In the 70’s during her prime, she wasn’t bad. Now she wouldn’t look out of place in a haunted house.
These has been’s just don’t know when to go away.
Hillary is,in spite of everything, useful: whatever she is against I’m for. And whatever she is for I’m against.
“Should we regulate female sexuality in the interests of society or leave it up to the free market?”
Hey Hunter, you want to regulate sexuality? How about a little White Sharia?
The woman and the man guilty of zin?? (for fornication or adultery),- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.”
—?Qur’an, Sura 24 (An-Nur), ayat 2
Or were you thinking something more along the lines of getting your old double standards back?
I guess Muslim men are more reasonable and fair-minded than you, Hunter.