Donald Trump Denies Going To War With Iran For Israel

Israel was attacked by Hamas on October 7th.

Trump has also said several times that he had to attack Iran to stop another Holocaust.

13 Comments

  1. “ Trump has also said several times that he had to attack Iran to stop another Holocaust.”

    I already thought the Iran “excursion” was bad to begin with. You don’t have to convince me further.

  2. I used to defend Trump against lying, because when he used to express an opinion the dems and media would say he was lying, thats how they lie. But as of late, Trump don’t seem to know how to stop lying. How many times now has he told us the war with Iran has been won? I’ve lost count. How long did he tell us the war was supposed to last? Four weeks? What about all the stupid, foreign, middle east wars he raged about? And now he has us in one of the dumbest. And now MTG is wondering if Butler, PA wasn’t a hoax. I have to wonder, too.
    I’m even beginning to wonder if he is not an AntiChrist.

  3. There are people left who believe anything that Cheeto the shit golem has to say?
    I almost feel sorry for them.
    Disco Boots Rubio said the attack was for Remphan from the start.

  4. > Israel was attacked by Hamas on October 7th.

    Oct. 7 was likely a false flag. Mossad founded Hamas and it has operated under their control for most of its existence – much like ISIS (who has never attacked Israel). The border wall was one of the most heavily guarded and defended places on the planet and numerous IDF have stated there was a stand-down order before the attack. Other IDF (or Mossad) forces flying choppers used hellfire missiles on the civilians fleeing the concert.

    > Trump has also said several times that he had to attack Iran to stop another Holocaust.

    Parroting the bullshit spewed daily by OUR GREATEST ALLY.

    The D-jeresys – who promoted wars for the usual suspects as much as Donigula has under Joey Shitpants’ teleprompter readership – pretending to be anti-war is risible. They’re all monkeys who dance to the same tune – Klezmer wailing puked out by Schlomo the organ-grinder, grinding away one-handed at his organ, tossing plastic shekels with the other.

  5. “Zionist takeover: Trump’s war on Iran reveals who really dictates US foreign policy”…presstv.ir

    Too bad the bulk of Americans can’t see the obvious.

    (Even that observation doesn’t go far enough. It isnt just Zionist , it extends to nearly all judaism. Also and tragically, it isn’t only foreign policy, they’ve made a wreck of our domestic society.)

  6. Livestream “Day 6 of the new rescue operation for
    the whale Timmy, aka ‘Hope’”: a truly hair-raising
    farce of political, media, technical incompetence.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xTjgb4uKB4

    Instead, other people’s feasible ideas are
    blocked, such as this one from an Austrian.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8m3SIItr3k
    Complete transcript https://sharetext.io/pzk3fy0d

    AI-summary:

    The speaker argues that the original rescue idea was sound and practical: instead of trying to drag or lift the whale immediately, the team proposed creating a temporary basin around it, raising the water level with salt water, and using available emergency resources such as THW and flood-protection equipment to let the whale float free and recover. In his view, this would have reduced suffering quickly, avoided unnecessary bureaucracy, and bought time for a safer transport plan later.

    He strongly criticizes the authorities, especially Minister Backhaus and the expert reports, for treating the whale’s condition as hopeless too early. He says the whale was not beyond saving, that claims about fatal skin damage or immediate death were exaggerated, and that the real issue was not skin but body weight, stress, and compression. He also says the whale was being “managed to death” through indecision, delays, and conflicting public messaging.

    A major theme is that the people around the case lacked practical rescue experience. He contrasts hands-on rescuers—mountain rescue, fire services, technical rescue teams—with theorists and bureaucrats who, in his opinion, were making decisions from afar without understanding large-animal rescue. He is especially critical of the way the media and some experts framed the situation as a palliative case rather than an active rescue case. In his view, palliative care means making an animal comfortable and pain-free, not leaving it to suffer.

    The speaker says the whale’s behavior proves that some earlier assumptions were wrong. He points out that Timmy/Hope was able to move and turn, which suggests the animal was not as firmly stuck as some claimed. He also says the whale likely does not have a net in its mouth or major swallowed debris, and that the danger zone around the tail means any lifting or sling-based rescue has to be handled extremely carefully. He explains that an un-sedated whale can react suddenly and that a hammock or lifting-sling approach could compress its organs or provoke dangerous movement.

    He describes the current situation as politically and legally messy. In his telling, officials were already preparing for disposal and other downstream steps while publicly saying they were still focused on rescue. He believes some behind-the-scenes actors would prefer the whale to die because a successful rescue would raise uncomfortable legal questions about why the animal had been left in distress for so long. He also argues that if the whale dies in open water, the cost and responsibility may be different than if it dies inside the Kieler Förde, which he says creates a financial incentive to control where the case ends.

    He praises some outside actors, especially private rescuers and animal advocates, while criticizing organizations he thinks have become too political or passive. He says practical, experienced animal-rescue groups are more valuable than organizations that mainly do public relations. He also notes that the whole case has become a symbol: people are watching it worldwide, and in his view it should have become a model for future whale rescues rather than a public relations disaster.

    The emotional core of the speech is simple: he believes Timmy/Hope is a suffering animal that deserved immediate, practical help, and that doing nothing was morally wrong. He says that even if rescue ultimately failed, it would have been better to try decisively than to watch the whale deteriorate for days or weeks while experts argued and politicians hesitated. He ends by insisting that any real rescue effort must prioritize the animal, not ego, politics, or reputational risk.

  7. Jew media used to push it constantly, and still do, that the Iraq War was about oil and White Gentile oil men practicing old fashioned resource-motivated imperialism. In reality, there’d be no issue regarding oil and America’s foreign policy in the Mideast if not for Israel! The oil embargoes, US sanctions, and now this Hormuz closure have all been judaic in cause.
    It is immensely positive that normies now point the finger at Israel for this war and not some cigar smoking Texas clique.

Leave a Reply to Silver Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*