Randy Garver, a thoughtful commenter with an opposing perspective, pondered…
Have any European advocacy groups attempted or achieved success in utilizing the existing politically correct multicultural infrastructure to gain popular support?
One would think that putative “pro-freedom” organizations like the ACLU would have no valid reason not to support the inclusion of pro-European groups at any table where the NAACP, NCLR, AIM, etc are seated.
This is not a new line of thinking. Quite a few smart people have pursued this strategy. The NAAWP was founded by David Duke with the slogan, “Equal rights for all, special privileges for none” and Resisting Defamation* defends “the diverse white American peoples” from defamation. Both can be understood as efforts to hoist our opponents on their own rhetorical petard, efforts to defeat them at their own game, to embrace multiculturalism’s surface argument and become another “minority” in our “pluralistic society”.
The short answer is that you can’t win a fight if you’re playing by the enemy’s rules. The long answer requires a brief review of the White American psyche and the origins of its multicult psychosis. The long answer is that the dramatic shift in American values within one generation can be best understood as a simple inversion of deeply entrenched beliefs rather than a replacement of those beliefs with different ones. The White Supremacist and Christian nation of 1924 underwent a sort of “pseudomorphosis” into what only appears to be an overwhelmingly cosmic and secular regime.
White Americans are still intrinsically White Supremacist and they’re still morally Christian, but both of these deeply held beliefs have been subverted, perverted, and inverted. They both remain standing, more or less, but upside-down. The thought of creating an “NAAWP” or worrying about “defamation” against us strikes the ordinary American as intuitively mean and stupid. This is because they’re not really viewing the world with the surface paradigm they present. They’re White Supremacists who are now compassionate toward the racially handicapped.
To advocate for Whites seems as dishonorable to them as a gifted athlete signing up for the Special Olympics. It seems as mean-spirited as putting together a “sight club” that excludes blind people and advocates for the interests of people who can see clearly. Would these Americans sit back while tens of millions of Frenchmen or Russians spilled over our borders triumphantly, heralding their plans to culturally displace and genetically replace us? Of course not! We don’t perceive Russians as inferior. In fact, we daydream about nefarious Commies parachuting into our communities and forcing us to prove our heroism. There will never be a “Brown Dawn” sequel to Red Dawn.
But to take on illegal immigrants? There’s no honor in that. To repel the Mexican invasion strikes the inverted supremacist as an act of cruelty against a cripple, equivalent to pushing a gimp’s wheelchair down a staircase. How could you possibly deport them when they’re trying so hard? Just give them a medal, already!
The modern White American liberal is no more honest when he speaks of Blacks being “equal” than he is when he speaks of the mentally retarded being “special”. He regards the Black American as something less than human, requiring his assistance and defense. Their actions betray their genuine beliefs, as they’re perpetually oriented toward integration, inclusion, making sure that both a guy in a wheelchair and a guy who suffers from Blackness get to feel “included”. The idea that some Blacks truly prefer their own culture and honestly wish to separate from them does not compute.
I believe the takeaway from this is that crudeness and “revulsionism” only plays into the opponent’s hand. It frames our entire movement in terms of the strong and superior picking on the weak and inferior. It’s probably better to do the opposite, playing up their competence. Instead of targeting the tiny Mestizo mowing their yard, target Mexico’s White elites who exploit those people as pawns in an ongoing effort to dominate the US. Instead of targeting the homeless Black guy, bring up Malcolm X, Barack Obama, and other Black men who are worthy opponents.
Whites perceive it as dishonorable to defend themselves and look with disdain at what we’re doing as “picking on the racially handicapped”. Fortunately, the illusion is growing more and more untenable. Blacks are triumphantly running Whites out of South Africa altogether. Blacks dominate our executive branch and openly exploit their power to push their racial agenda. NAACP representatives openly brag about how they exploit their positions of power in government to favor Blacks over Whites. Their advocacy organizations surpass ours in wealth, power, and competence.
As our death spiral accelerates, fewer and fewer White Americans will think of themselves as superior protectors of their racial inferiors and start thinking of themselves as a people, a cornered people, a cornered people surrounded by a hostile “rainbow coalition”. We need to become the credible and legitimate advocates they can turn to when they awaken.
Update:
* Resisting Defamation completely rejects the claim that they have a goal of becoming another “minority” in a “pluralistic society”
Mr Parrott
Brilliant article!
I have always thought Liberals were the biggest White Supremacists of all because they think Africans can’t do anything without White supervision but at the same time Blacks are “special”.
“Racially handicapped” is a useful way of seeing ther thinking.
I second Dermot’s comment — brilliant! Steve Sailer has said the same thing but in a less elegant way. “racially handicapped,” LOL. Definitely a novel articulation.
I wish I could take full credit, but Hunter S. Thompson actually coined that expression in “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas”.
Yes, a brilliant expose of one facet of White Rabbit Psychology.
White Rabbits feel better if they fool themselves into thinking all those Brown and Black Rabbits just got a dye-job, and are really White Rabbits inside their fur.
White Rabbits ARE “supremacist” to think other rabbits are “just like us”; that’s how we stroke our own fur … assuming the other rabbits are “just as good as White Rabbits”.
If a White Rabbit felt the need to defend his Whiteness, he would be admitting that those colored rabbits really aren’t just White Rabbits with a dye-job. That would crash his universe.
So the white rabbits maintain their self-deception, because it feels so warm and fuzzy to think every rabbit is really just a white rabbit in disguise.
“White Americans are still intrinsically White Supremacist and they’re still morally Christian, but both of these deeply held beliefs have been subverted, perverted, and inverted.”
In my opinion, Christian morality has not been “subverted”, “perverted” or “inverted”. It is reaching the logical conclusion of its secular realization. Christianity and White Supremacy are mutually exclusive ideologies. Because the former is more powerful than the latter, White Supremacists are enduring the collective crucifixion for which their Christian brothers have long begged.
The “NAA_P” strategy seems to work for Jews just fine.
Masterful work, Matt.
Indeed, in the face of mounting evidence, the more the elite try to cover up the misbehaviour of non-whites the more likely the people’s benevolence and patience will fade.
However, I fear it will probably take quite a ‘mugging by realty’ to shake some of these diversity followers out of their (primarily) media-induced coma. And even when they come around to our side regarding the blacks and browns, there’s still the task of opening their eyes regarding the Jews.
But, as they say, you’ve got to walk before you can run.
Parler White says:
December 10, 2009 at 1:28 am
The reason liberal whites give blacks a pass on this sort of thing it because it shows that whites are superior. Crude anti-black statements are considered as classless as making fun of a retarded person. As said above “everyone knows this” and it proves your status by ignoring it, or even better, actively denying it.
It works the same with immigration, only those so low in status as to actually have to compete with or live around immigrants would be worried about immigration. If you are a white macho conservative libertarian type, it’s because you are so amazingly talented you have no fear of competition with immigrants.
Money buys segregation and the only blacks or mestizos in the gated community are doing yard work, so the only possible reason to complain about blacks is because you’re poor.
The stereotype that WNs spend all day telling nigger jokes is far more detrimental to the reputation of the white movement than serious commentary on Jews. In some ways your enemy defines you, who do you choose to fight?
The miscegenation thing is also irrelevant, or would be, without Hollywood trying to make it cool for young white women. All men of all races want white women, but white women 99.99% of the time want want men – unless they’ve been brainwashed by Hollywood.
It ain’t blacks in charge of Hollywood.
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/12/09/tigergate/comment-page-1/#comment-26603
“There will never be a “Brown Dawn” sequel to Red Dawn.”
Untrue! “Machete” by Richard Rodriguez is coming soon, and will do wonders for us, just as Red Dawn was a boon to the anti-communists of the 1980s! But of course, inadvertently, as it is not the directors intention to awaken whites.
Still from the promos I’ve seen I’m very hopeful!
The Andrew Breitbart nonsense about the black women at Ag and the white farmer is a case in point. Breitbart and FOX news send crypto-white “conservative Republican anti-liberals” out to snare some blacks into saying something “racist” – and he couldn’t even do that right. The “pimp and ho” video turned out to be bs – the brown ACORN staffer did the right thing and called the police – and to actually informed Whites, the conservative crypto-white advocates not only attacked the “racially handicapped” but couldn’t even do it honestly.
Now the NAACP lady video turned out to be more bs, Breitbart edited it so deceptively anyone who read the context would know she was talking about how she learned to “love whites as her fellow economically challenged people” or whatever.
That’s what the GOP wants to do – get whites to fight blacks and browns, and ignore real potential threats – Jews, Asians, and Indians.
Do you want to go fighting in the mud? If so, be a Conservative Republican.
…
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/07/14/spenglerian-decadence/comment-page-4/#comment-67978
Or you could try to inspire the young, smart whites with the Bible and ancient Christian fantasy, with all the Jew baggage. Johnson makes a subtle but important point here, I hope everyone gets it. Conservatism is simply a reaction, it’s playing defense. White people’s defenses suck. We should work on offense.
Imm doesn’t do jack but entertain “White Nationalists” and it’s high time everyone realizes it. Holding up a sign on the street corner accomplishes exactly nothing. So does voting on reddit. Those competing to be the New White Media better learn this lesson or give up, put on a Civil War outfit, and reenact Gettysburg.
Right…on. The Kosher Mafia grows more arrogant and visible by the hour. And it isn’t going to be just (some) whites who come to their senses. When the Big Ponzi collapses, their own hired allies will turn on them. So, in order to liquidate the Main Enemy, we may find it useful make some temporary, tactical alliances with elements of the racially handicapped.
To be pro-White is to be competitive with all the non-Whites and Cosmic Whites against whom we struggle to assert a positive identity and gain self-determination. It’s not necessary to mention Jews in every context because they’re not relevant in every context. The length that some people go to play an elaborate Kevin Baconstein game of associative reasoning to drag every issue back to the Jews is absurd and indicative of a monomaniacal condition.
CompassionateFascist,
You’re not a White Nationalist. Just as your plan to build a rainbow coalition of all gentiles is a tactical ploy against the Jews, your participation in pro-White groups is a tactical ploy against the Jews. You’re not in this for the same reason that we are. I’m not an exterminationist, have never been an exterminationist, and will never be an exterminationist. To the extent that you perceive that it’s appropriate to discuss “liquidating” a group of people, it’s a mental health matter and (if specific enough) a legal matter.
I actually think it is much worst. You describe a passive process – honorable neglect. The whole orthodox apparatus is to ACTIVELY place these folks on a pedestal.
For example (and since you brought it to point), note the proliferation of handicap placards – not just used to co-opt the slothful spot in the Wigger-Mart parking lot, but hanging proudly while traveling down the highway.
White folks used to be ashamed of owning one of these and placed them back into the glove box upon placing their ample buttocks in the bucket seat. Now they proudly blaze on down the suburban roads with it hanging from their mirrors.
We actively coddle and have co-opted the victimology. Gone are the games at Olympia. Now we celebrate the wigger with “blue badge of honor” and the neighborhood golf cart. This is honor turned upside down, and is killing our people. It is an active process and their isn’t a thing about it that is beneath our new “dignity.”
Mike
Matt, I think you’ve really put your finger right on the pulse of this issue. Excellent.
Matt says, “Resisting Defamation defends ‘the diverse white American peoples’ from defamation. Both can be understood as efforts to hoist our opponents on their own rhetorical petard, efforts to defeat them at their own game, to embrace multiculturalism’s surface argument and become another ‘minority’ in our ‘pluralistic society’.”
It is true on a tactical level that Resisting Defamation co-opts multicultural rhetoric, but on a strategic level that operation provides a platform for a white voice in a white-centric way that works to break down the taboo against speaking in a white voice.
Until the diverse white American peoples, or a significant portion, break through that taboo, nothing will change. Grand theories and pronunciamentos will not do it.
We completely reject the claim that a goal of Resisting Defamation is to “become another ‘minority’ in our ‘pluralistic society.”
Jay,
I apologize for the misrepresentation and have integrated a clarification linking to your objection into the post.
Excellent post.
It’s not necessary to mention Jews in every context because they’re not relevant in every context.
However, they’re highly relevant in this contaext. They are rich and powerful, anything but “racially handicapped”. Thus, we have yet another reason to focus on the Jewish role.
I call them Big Momma Libs.
We need to become the credible and legitimate advocates they can turn to when they awaken.
Talk about playing by the enemy’s rules.
Speak among your own as you would speak among your own.
“It’s not necessary to mention Jews in every context because they’re not relevant in every context. The length that some people go to play an elaborate Kevin Baconstein game of associative reasoning to drag every issue back to the Jews is absurd and indicative of a monomaniacal condition.”
In this particular context, Jews could not be more relevant. My post above is a counterexample to your thesis that white defense or advocacy organisations are seen as a LIONS Club counterpart for sighted people. Jews are highly competent, make up an extremely disproportionate part of the elite overclass, are half of the the billionaires and yet, nonetheless have defensive and advocacy organisations.
Matt: Your knee-jerk reaction against anyone mentioning Jews (in this case without thinking about it at all) seems more indicative of pathology to me than what you’re reacting against.
You might have part of the answer but I don’t think you explain fully why we’re maligned if we try to send a white kid to summer camp.
A-C Jewish charities in Great Britain:
AJEX CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
AKIM
ALL ABOARD SHOPS LIMITED
BEN URI GALLERY
BIRTHDAY ANGELS
BOARD OF DEPUTIES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
BRIGHTON & HOVE JEWISH WELFARE BOARD
BRITISH FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY
BRITISH FRIENDS OF BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM
BRITISH FRIENDS OF EZER MIZION
BRITISH FRIENDS OF HAIFA UNIVERSITY
BRITISH FRIENDS OF ISRAEL WAR DISABLED
BRITISH FRIENDS OF NEVE SHALOM – WAHAT AL-SALAM (NSWaS) – OASIS OF PEACE
BRITISH FRIENDS OF SHUVU
BRITISH FRIENDS OF THE ART MUSEUMS OF ISRAEL
BRITISH FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM
BRITISH FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION
BRITISH FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTRE FOR THE BLIND
BOARD OF DEPUTIES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
BRIGHTON & HOVE JEWISH WELFARE BOARD
BRITISH FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY
BRITISH FRIENDS OF BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM
BRITISH FRIENDS OF EZER MIZION
BRITISH FRIENDS OF HAIFA UNIVERSITY
BRITISH FRIENDS OF ISRAEL WAR DISABLED
BRITISH FRIENDS OF NEVE SHALOM – WAHAT AL-SALAM (NSWaS) – OASIS OF PEACE
BRITISH FRIENDS OF SHUVU
BRITISH FRIENDS OF THE ART MUSEUMS OF ISRAEL
BRITISH FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM
BRITISH FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION
BRITISH FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTRE FOR THE BLIND
BRITISH FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTRE
BRITISH FRIENDS OF TIFERET SHLOMO ORPHANAGE, JERUSALEM
BRITISH FRIENDS OF TIKVA ODESSA
BRITISH ORT
BRITISH SUPPORTERS OF EPHRAT
BRITISH TECHNION SOCIETY
CAMP SIMCHA
CHAI CANCER CARE
CHIZUK
CLICK
COSGROVE CARE
I think once someone is some presently PC arena drops the “anti-white” lable on someone or some org. we will see the game changer. Then people can start to evaluate beyond the simplistic “poor colored folk let me play big momma” act and can see the naacp and the sherrods for what they are, never mind the big jews who dominate the BigAnti-White (to borrow from breitbart).
As of now the taboo must be strong because it seems no one can use such a simple phrase, but once it is applied the need to compete for an audience will bring it into popular venacular and bring things our way.
Wish we could get James Edwards onto some MSM show to drop it on their heads.
ben,
However, they’re highly relevant in this contaext. They are rich and powerful, anything but “racially handicapped”. Thus, we have yet another reason to focus on the Jewish role.
I agree that there’s a good point to be made, there. I had actually thought of that and decided it was worthy of fleshing out into a completely separate post that explores the growing absurdity of their feigned “victim” status.
It just gets under my skin that a contingent here regards every any failure to bang away at the Jews in any context as implying that I’m some kind of neocon mole.
John,
I don’t have a knee-jerk reaction against people mentioning Jews. I have a knee-jerk reaction against people getting pushy with me about it and jumping to absurd conclusions because I failed to think about them for a spell. Your comment is a perfect example, implying that I somehow don’t believe that Jews are powerful and have powerful advocacy groups. Do you seriously think I’m asserting to the contrary? Do you seriously think that my failure to discuss them in this one instance implies that I need to be reminded with an alphabetized paste flood?
Matt,
Your article raised interesting points that I hadn’t considered.
I’m not a “modern white liberal” myself, but I’ve debated more than a few. I would posit that many of them, rather than seeing blacks as intrinsically less capable, believe that their relative lack of success stems from endemic discrimination. The narrative that “The Man was [and still is] keeping them down” is quite pervasive.
This is a plausible-sounding argument for many leftish whites, and the best part is that so long as a disparity exists between black and white achievement, the need for continuing remedy is self-perpetuating.
I’d also suggest than many white Americans (especially in the younger generations) simply haven’t thoughtfully and forthrightly engaged the issue of race. It’s certainly not a topic that I’ve heard discussed much, except for whispers in hushed tones between family or close friends.
“I would posit that many of them, rather than seeing blacks as intrinsically less capable, believe that their relative lack of success stems from endemic discrimination. The narrative that “The Man was [and still is] keeping them down” is quite pervasive.”
Think harder.
“The Man was (and still is) keeping them down,” means that The Man (White “bad guys”) was and is superior. Or else intrinsically capable people would have overthrown him of their own efforts. But The Man can only be gotten off the Blacks through the efforts of other, heroic, Whites (the “good-guy” Supermans).
Your lefty buddies do, in fact, see Blacks as intrinsically less capable or Blacks would not need the White lefties to be Superman and get The Man off them for them.
They’re definitely supremacists to the extreme, but they’re multi-cultural and multi-racial supremacists. I say that to non-Whites and liberals and they don’t know how to respond.
Matt: “Your comment is a perfect example, implying that I somehow don’t believe that Jews are powerful and have powerful advocacy groups. Do you seriously think I’m asserting to the contrary? ”
Not addressing my point in your post or when I brought it up but instead saying it’s not relevant and calling me a compulsive Jew-basher for bringing it up rendered me unsure on that point and thinking some evidence of my position was needed. Thanks for clearing it up.
John,
My original objection wasn’t to you or about you. Parler White blew off the entire post with a sweeping declaration that it’s really not about non-Whites at all – but that it’s really only about Jews. CompassionateFascist declared that we need to ally with non-Whites to “liquidate” the Jews. I can’t respond to every post, but your comment didn’t warrant any frustration and I didn’t aim any at you. I think this was a mutual misunderstanding that’s been resolved.
Okay, I didn’t see that post and I see what you mean. He derailed the discussion pretty good.
* Resisting Defamation completely rejects the claim that they have a goal of becoming another “minority” in a “pluralistic society”
I don’t think they will ever allow us to become just another minority. We will always be the evil white whether we are the majority or minority. They can do this because combined they see themselves as “people of color” in opposition to people of no color (whites.) It is their ability to stand together under the banner “people of color” that unites them against us.
We are people of white color.
I want to suggest we start referring to ourselves as people of white color. Relabel ourselves as white-colored people. We are, afterall, not white but various shades of what is called white. Blacks are not black either but still have no problem seeing themselves and being seen as belonging in the big “people of color” tent. It throws the whole color paradigm back in their face.
Non colored (white) people will always be a minority against colored people.
It may be just semantics but I see it as taking our rightful place in the big colored tent. Ironically wealthy dominating WHITE jews have managed to push and shove their way to the font of the “people of color” tent.
Also the “people of color” paradigm reduces racial differences to one unimportant factor, the amount of melanin in the skin.
Once we force them to recognize us as people of white color we can shift the focus of race difference to where it belongs, intelligence and moral and cultural differences.
Soso,
I don’t think “people of white color” is a good idea. I’m a nationalist, and believe that White American is the most simple, transparent, and natural way to define our common ethnonational identity. “People of white color” manages to dismiss racial differences as merely skin deep AND define our identity exclusively on racial differences. In the American historical context, virtually all Whites (with one big notable Semitic exception) blended into a seamless White American nationality and the people who belonged to a different ethnonational identity were of completely different races. So we’re a bit too inclined to speak in terms of race when we’re really thinking in national terms.
If all Mexicans turned White tomorrow, but retained their Hispanic ethnic identities and failed/refused to become “White Americans”, they would still need to be repelled.
I know it’s a bit more complex than that, that there are regional variations and groups that retain some vestigial Old World identities. There’s no “correct” way to draw the circle. But I think the smartest way to draw the circle is to define and defend the “White American” identity.
People of White has some advantages. One is its acronym “POW” while People of Color has just “POC” to play with. And of course the plural form of POC sounds just like “pox.”
I don’t think the great divide between POWs and POCs will be the only line for long. The strains between blacks and bronzes are growing on a daily basis with drive-by lynching a weekly fare in Los Angeles. Hospital and municipality takeovers by bronzes from blacks adds to the strain. Bronze people are taking all the entry level jobs that lesser educated blacks used in the past to get a foot on the ladder….no high school diploma + no entry level job = no entry into American success….ever.
However, if you think the diverse white Americans are unusually susceptible to propaganda by the dominant media culture and the corporate entertainment culture, you haven’t seen anything until you talk about this stuff with blacks and bronzes….they really believe the silver screen and the TV tube are reality. There is probably hope for liberating white people from this propaganda (any intellectual out there wanting to tackle how to do this?), but there is no hope for liberating black or bronze people from it.
Jared Taylor’s faves, the Asians, are still a toss-up. They want to live the way we do, but the allure of black cultures is really appealing to their children.
By the way, a self-confident POW society could sweep these problems away in a week no matter how late it seems. We are far too resourceful once the debilitating propaganda is removed.
I really don’tthink we want to get involved in the ridiculous “name the race” game. Blacks only do it because they are constantly looking for a name for themselves that doesn’t have negative connotations – a self-defeating quest. White men are White men. Call us honkies, crackers, gringos – as long as it refers to a White man, it can’t be bad. You can’t insult us; as Shakespeare said, “What’s in a name?”
That said, I might support, say, “people of light”, just for satirical effect and to p*** off the “people of color”.