The White Republic

Christine Cosser is a leftist blogger who writes quite regularly about White Nationalism. I left the following comment at her website in response to a remark about the Founding Fathers.

The Founding Fathers created a White Republic for their posterity. This is an indisputable historical fact. Whatever lingering doubts that remained about the status of non-Whites in America were removed by the Dred Scott decision in which the Supreme Court ruled that only Whites were U.S. citizens.

The genealogy of your anti-racist beliefs can be traced back to Marxism and the Soviet Union. Glenda Gilmore has a good book about the subject, Defying Dixie: The Radical Roots of Civil Rights, 1919 – 1950. Before writing anything further about White Nationalism, I strongly recommend you brush up on American history. A course or two in the history of ideas could also do you some good.

About Hunter Wallace 12380 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent


  1. I agree with you Prozium. History is undeniable. But we also can’t deny the fact that the founding fathers made a critical mistake in allowing slavery to be brought to the shores of the new republic. In doing so, they unwittingly sowed the seeds of our destruction. I believe that, had they been gifted with the powers of prophecy, the founding fathers would have gone to any extent to prevent what we are seeing today. Never in their wildest dreams did they forsee the landscape of modern America wrecked by cultural Marxism. But they were warned. And warned again. Myriad numbers of abolitionists and religious figures warned about the consequences of slavery throughout the 19th century. And they were ignored.

    And the raw reality of that time is the majority of American whites carried the water for the small minority of wealthy elitists who benefitted from slavery. These owners exploited blacks cruelly, they denied employment opportunities to native whites, and they created strife that eventually led to an unnecessary war all to preserve their own selfish ways. And in the end, poor whites who had nothing to do with slavery shed their blood on account of the rich. Nowadays, the modern rich class BLAMES the nation as a whole for slavery, and castigates the white middle class for being “rednecks”. Especially Hollywood, who ginned up much of the racist stereotypes against blacks in the first place.

    Our second mistake was made in the aftermath of the civil war. Emancipated blacks should have been repatriated without delay to Liberia, or to the country of their choice in Africa. All of them, without choice.

    That leads me to the third mistake. Abraham Lincoln should have lived up to his second inaugural address where he made mention of the fact that freed blacks needed to be treated appropriately. Absent the true solution of sending them back to their homeland, blacks should have been given more help to make the transition to freedom in a free market society. The one hundred years of stupidity that followed reconstruction should never have been allowed to happen. Blacks should have been given land financing and rudimentary tools necessary to begin being self sufficient. And the states and federal government should have proportionately divied up the cost, according to some just and reasonable formula developed by common consent. The third mistake is that reparations should have been made 140 years ago. It would have been much, much cheaper.

    The founding fathers created this nation for a white posterity… and they also destroyed the possibility of it. The point is moot anyway. This is 2009, we have this reality, and it isn’t going to be reasoned away with logic. Not at all. We are fast coming to the nexus of a spiral of conflicting interests. My guess is, unfortunately, that we cannot win and we need to think about emigrating elsewhere. It’s already too late for this country, absent some very extreme changes that can’t happen anyway.

  2. Well done, Prozium. We must engage our enemies as well, not just preach to the choir.

    That’s why I think a guy like Buchanan does some good. While he’s not an explicit racialist, and has set himself against us in some ways, he still argues in favor of the West and is a counter force to liberalism.

  3. I suspect Buchanan’s Catholicism prevents him from going all the way on the race issue. The Vatican’s hold on his mind, turning a portion of his brain into the functional equivalent of pulp, is an intellectual Achilles heel for Buchanan.

    The Vatican is one of today’s greatest forces for genocide. Had the Vatican stood against genocide from the start in the 1950s, the Jews couldn’t have done a thing. Not a thing! For its own reasons the Vatican chose instead to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the Jews, with the unbridled crony capitalists, and with the other forces of epoch-making evil in doing everything in its power to promote genocide, and it is still doing it in 2009 as we speak.

    Nothing can turn the Vatican away from evil.

  4. Jew Scrooby Insults Gentiles With Typical Jew Presumption, Lack Of References
    (Apollonian, 27 Jul 09)

    I wonder what Jew Scrooby actually means by “going all the way on the race issue”? And what on earth is Jew Scrooby talking about anyway?–he not giving any references or citations for his babbling.

    What Scrooby the Jew fails to pt. out is Vatican, like all establishement Christian institutions, is owned lock, stock, and barrel by Jew COUNTERFEITERS who run the world fractional-reserve system of banks–see,, and for expo/ref.

    “Evil” is pure hysterical balderdash (Pelagianism) by Scrooby the Jew, but of course this “good-evil” crap is Jews’ stock-in-trade by which they exhort and manipulate the stupid, over-populated goyim. For there is and can be no “evil” or “good” in a determined universe in accord with strict cause-effect, the only possible inductive conclusion in reason.

    CONCLUSION: Jew Scrooby”s intention, I submit, is un-questionably to legitimize Talmudic psychopathology, the Talmud simply the ritual murder of goyim, Jew Scrooby’s purpose to persuade goyim there are “good” Jews–like there are “good Talmudists”–like there are “good” psychopaths and “good” child-molestors. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

  5. There are Catholics who go into spitting foaming hysterics when the Vatican is counterattacked for its genocide. I infer Apollonian is one.

  6. The other thing about the Vatican, of course, is not only is it throwing every ounce of influence it has (as well as every dime of cash it has left over after settling all its child molestation law suits) into the struggle to genocide white people, it’s also throwing all its resources into the struggle to replace Christianity in Europe with Islam. The Vatican won’t rest until everywhere a white man once lived a Negro has taken his place, everywhere a white woman was once impregnated by a white man a Negro has taken that white man’s place and impregnates her, and everywhere a Catholic church once stood a Moslem mosque stands in its place.

  7. Goodness how can someones knowledge of American History be that poor?!?!

    Here is the comment I left over there:
    Laugh out loud! Your knowledge of American History is so weak!

    ” “Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them.”

    – Thoman Jefferson

    Also I am curious if you have even heard of the American Colonization Society??

    According to your logic America was founded for all Races, but then, to twist it into your thinking, its Elite worked to export as many non-Whites as possible??!?!? Uh hello that doesn’t fit! Clearly America was created as a White Nation and its Elites at the time worked to move out non-Whites.

  8. ” “Evil” is pure hysterical balderdash (Pelagianism) by Scrooby the Jew, but of course this “good-evil” crap is Jews’ stock-in-trade by which they exhort and manipulate the stupid, over-populated goyim.”

    Ok I am going to bite: Apollonian you are wailing away about ‘good-evil crap’ but then in other posts posit that a resurgence in Christianity is the only way forward as you paraphrase that Christianity is at its core anti-semitic!

    But one of the core notions of Christianity is ‘good evil crap’!! (this has probably been borrowed from the Asiatic faith of Zoroastrianism, the notion of total inherent ‘evil’ is completely absent from the ‘Ancient Religion’/ Pagan beliefs of Ancient Aryan man.)

  9. The very first law regarding who could become a US citizen, The Naturalization Act of 1790, begins:

    Act of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat 103-104) (Excerpts) That any alien, being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof. . .

  10. As it happens, I have discussed the matter in depth on my blog in the American Racial History Timeline. George Washington didn’t want negroes serving in the Continental Army. Their eventual participation (est. 5,000) was due only to the wartime desperation of the American cause and the necessity of quelling slave rebellions.

    Funny how you have nothing to say about the fact that far more negroes fought for Great Britain in the American Revolution than the United States. The same is true of the so-called “Native Americans” who massacared white settlers and sided with France and Britain all along the frontier.

    The Founding Fathers were White men wrote the Constitution for their posterity. Their vision of America didn’t include blacks who didn’t become U.S. citizens until the Fourteenth Amendment during Reconstruction. Negroes were later banned from serving in the Army, Navy, Marines, and from carrying the mail. The Constitution refers to them as “persons” and “property,” not as fellow citizens.

  11. Christian Aesthetic Is Genuine, Potent Weapon Of Anti-Semitism
    (Apollonian, 28 Jul 09)

    “Harsh Henry,” u need to read things better–u don’t really have slightest idea as to what u pretend to be talking about. Observe Gosp. JOHN theme is Truth vs. Jew lies and conspiracy, allegorical parallel to Western, Aristotelian objective vs. Talmudic, Babylonian subjective.

    “Good-evil” is subjective and absurd in a determined, objective reality (“God-created,” according to Christian allegory) in accord w. strict cause-effect. Further, u need to provide citations/references if u seriously want to make a substantial pt. for ur thesis. Otherwise, note allegory, including Christian, will make use of figurative words and phrases like “faith” and “good-evil.”

    Virtue of Christianity is it is an aesthetic epitomization for otherwise dry and implicit philosophy, an over-all synthesization for intellect which otherwise gets tedious. Christ isn’t going to be caught speaking in clinical terms like a college professor; rather, he wants to commune with the people by means of aesthetics and, for example, ref.s to Old Testament.

    CONCLUSION: So get a clue, “Henry” of harshness; Christian aesthetic is excellent, potent weapon against Jew lies and conspiracy indeed, as I’ve noted–u only need to use some intelligence as u understand and apply it. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

  12. This is individual is an ex-WN, and was a member of DAR (Daughters of the American Revolution). Her big transformation occurred when she found Catholism she even has changed her name it used to be Cassie Cosser, that was her screen name on stormfront.

  13. Clearly, I really am the more educated one here. See the American Racial History Timeline on my blog. You haven’t replied with anything of substance that contradicts the facts I noted above.

    The Founding Fathers reserved U.S. citizenship to Whites in the Naturalization Act of 1790. In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, Congress passed more than a dozen further naturalization acts that reaffirmed the racial basis of American citizenship.

    The matter was addressed and finally settled in the Dred Scott decision which held that only Whites could be U.S. citizens. This is why the Reconstruction Amendments were necessary to extend citizenship to blacks and other non-White minorities.

    As for Thomas Jefferson, he was a pioneer of what is now known as “scientific racism.” He supported the deportation of blacks to their “native clime” until he drew his last breath. In his view, blacks could enjoy freedom and equality in Africa.

    Nothing I have said is in anyway controversial. It has all been acknowledged by mainstream historians.

  14. The Church and anti-Semitism—again
    Kevin MacDonald
    “Recently there has been a media uproar about the reinstatement of the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), a traditionalist Catholic group, that broke off from the Church after the reforms of Vatican II. Jewish groups are furious that there would be any attempt to reconcile these traditionalists to the Church. This is not surprising since the issue that led to the schism was the reform of the Church initiated by the Second Vatican Council and its declaration on Judaism, anti-Semitism, and non-Christian religions….”

  15. “Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them.”

    – Thoman Jefferson

    I posted the above quote on her page before I saw that Harsh Henry had posted it here.

    Initially it looked like the comment had been accepted.

    Several hours later it was gone.

    So apparently bumper-sticker-length quotes from Thomas Jefferson are dangerous thoughtcrimes, doomed for the memory hole.

  16. ” Several hours later it was gone.”

    Hmm.. it appears my comment from earlier was taken down! All I did was mention Jeffersons favorite quote and also post about the American Colonization Society!

    Apparently the Truth must be censored.

    One feels the need to use a little saltier language then normal: Christine Cosser is a BITCH!

  17. “Yes, the state of Israel does bad things like all governments do, but why do you hate or dislike the average “Jewish Person” who is just trying like everyone else doing the best they can to survive this crazy world?”
    Sounds like an argument for cutting white Americans slack.

    She goes off towards the end of her spiel in the comment section. Something about carrying the blood of the Founding Fathers in her veins and fighting WNs-physically. Strange.

Comments are closed.