At the movies the other day I saw a trailer for the upcoming Ridley Scott film “Robin Hood,” which features Russell Crowe as the legendary Anglo-Saxon freedom fighter seeking “liberty and the law.”
As a good reactionary, I’m typically dead-set against remakes of classic films. By any measure, Errol Flynn did Robin Hood right and that is that.
But Scott did “Blade Runner” and “Gladiator,” not to mention the scariest damn film I’ve ever seen, “Alien,” so I gave the trailer more attention than I normally would. I also think that Crowe is a fine actor and, believe me, it’s no small relief these days to behold a straight, masculine leading man who typically is the strong man doing right regardless of cost. (Both men are, of course, good liberals, but if one held to that standard, one would have to be a monk).
The trailer begins with a young Robin setting what appears to be a cornerstone for a keep with his father. Carved into the cornerstone, to be covered up of course, is the following:
Rise and Rise Again,
Until Lambs Become Lions
The trailer was quite impressive and it appears to me that there is a better than average chance that this film may be worthwhile, but it was that carving that stuck in my mind.
Obviously, we are to believe that the sentiment expressed by the carving is something to admire, something that the hero Robin takes to heart and later takes action on.
But let’s step outside the realm of make believe and see what this maxim really means.
I was very young when I noticed that in life there are, broadly speaking, two general classes of people. The Responsible, a very tiny minority, selected not by class or background but by nature or, if you’d prefer, by God, whose thankless task it is to care about everything and anything; and The Sheep, the vast majority, whose pleasurable task it is to simply live and take everything at face value.
If I had been given a choice, I know which one I’d pick. Who needs the hassle?
But, alas, no such choice is given. If one is one of the Responsible, you’re screwed from the start. I mean, you’re smart, sensitive and insightful, but guess what big man? Guess whose job it is to “Rise and Rise Again” until the Sheep notice something is wrong?
Yeah, that’s right: you.
So, there you are. You know what’s going on. You know that the current government is insane and that in this nation’s fixed political context, there will be no reversal of policy. There will be no enforcement of the U.S. border with Mexico, as there has not been for the past 30 years. There will be no slow-down of massive legal immigration. There will be no slow-down of non-white and Muslim refugees–made all the more numerous by U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan–in previously European-American regions of the nation.
The current ideology cannot accept any such scale back, let alone a stoppage, any more than the mummified leaders atop Lenin’s Tomb could admit that collectivization of agriculture was a failure economically.
In both cases, to admit the reality of the situation would be to admit the bankruptcy of the ruling ideology, calling the entire logic of the ruling structure into place.
This simply will not happen.
There are only three possible outcomes: (1) Most likely, the power elite “elect a new people” and the U.S. becomes a Latin American country with a sizeable European-American minority; (2) the system collapses as the Soviet Union did; or (3) Euro-Americans give up on the U.S. and fight for a new homeland, with a new nationalism and nationalist ideal.
The choice is before us, and before us now. Fight now, or be erased. And by “fight” I mean just that: fight.
And guess what? The Sheep won’t thank you for your work. In fact, the Sheep like winners and only winners so if you are unsuccessful the very people you were fighting for will jeer and cheer as you get led in chains before the system triumphant. If you win, of course, they’ll have been at your side all along—knew you were right, mate—and cheer you as you announce the new order.
Frankly, the Sheep aren’t really worth it. We all know that in our heart. Our fellow European North Americans deserve the ass kicking they are about to receive at the hands of their new masters and it’s not an insane reaction to relish that day and prepare a few pints of good ale and ready a long and bitter laugh.
But you won’t do that, will you?
No, you won’t.
Because, dammit, you’re one of the Responsible.
Great essay.
What would you call a shepherd that tries to teach his sheep to talk? Insane most likely. Sheep cannot be “enlightened” because they are sheep. So what does a good shepherd do? He has his sheep dog viciously barking at the rear to get them moving where you want them to go, and if one gets out of line, you hook his neck with your staff and drag him back.
The other thing about shepherding is what you do with the sheep. There is wool and there is mutton.
And that’s how I developed a taste for mutton.
Sir Ridley Scott doesn’t make a bad movie. Black Hawk Down is another great one.
He did Alien, James Cameron did Aliens.
Russell Crowe is a good actor, but unfortunately his great-great grandmother was M?ori and he is proud of it.
Awesome. Can’t wait to see this. I love historical movies. I’m sure the critics are already saying this film suffers from an appalling lack of diversity!
*M?ori
Oh well, it won’t display that correctly.
Thanks for the post graphics update, Hunter. Your web-fu is strong.
I love historical movies. I’m sure the critics are already saying this film suffers from an appalling lack of diversity!
Exactly, that’s enough reason to see it right there. What a breath of fresh air. People from the South especially appreciate this!
Often times now they don’t even care about accuracy, they’ll sneak one in as a Moor as they did in the 1991 version with Kevin Costner, or just outright use a mulatto and pretend they’re White.
I think that the tremendous economo-cultural advantage that has existed for the other side is fading away. They use money like a weapon to shape society and rig it against us. But when society simply doesn’t work, and the money-tool-weapon shoots blanks or stops shooting altogether, we will be able to participate in the manufacturing of culture again.
The combination of mass media and public education as mutually reinforcing shapers of culture is going to fade in power, and other forces that shape behavior will take the fore.
The money-weapon has bureaucratic and legal enforcements from kindergarten, through school, the mutually reinforcing power of many children watching the same TV shows and thus reinforcing the TV shows on one another.
So we will be able to fight, as the trump card over us attenuates, as it wanes. Growth economy and pop culture and political correctness go hand in hand, and shall sink together. Economy constructs Culture, Culture constructs Ideology. They use it on us like pumping nutrients into a petri dish and exciting the bacteria to do what they want it to do. We are not much more than a biological experiment for their entertainment.
The elites want a world of people who remind them of the Ecuadorean named Pepe who brings them their scotch on the rocks. Unthreatening, always grateful, always accomodating. A mechanical engineer scares the crap out of them. Anyone with an independent thought scares the crap out of them.
That’s why illegals are permitted to invade and rob the country. The bankster looks at MS-13 and sees his “children,” except they are as children should be — forever subservient, obedient, agreeable, loyal.
“the 1991 version with Kevin Costner”
The presence of Kevin Costner is the sure sign of an anti-white movie:
Dances with Wolves
Tombstone
Water World
The Mailman
#7, if you thought the 1991 movie was bad, did you know the BBC has TV series on both Robin Hood and King Arthur where Friar Tuck and Guinevere are black? Okay King Arthur is more legend but a black queen in ancient Britain is even more fanciful.
Scott also did Kingdom of Heaven, which has some great cinematography and battle scenes. Saladin was portrayed pretty accurately. He was also a Kurd, which means he was probably more white than arab. The pile of heads in a few scenes are classic. I hope to see that here one day.
If we had a few Robin Hoods administering Aryan Justice to the Goldman Sachs of the world, we might just be able to get a revolution kicked off.
Yes, when push comes to shove in America, many if not most white sheeple are going to be on the wrong side of the barricades. Tough for them, and good on any Russell Crowe-like “Maoris” who fight on our (my) side. Exclusivist racial nationalism is a sure loser, operational nationalism a sure winner.
Operational Nationalism ftw!
Seriously, I like that term and the idea behind it.
I really like this post, Albert.
“But you won’t do that, will you?
No, you won’t.
Because, dammit, you’re one of the Responsible.”
We very well may. Being responsible also means culling your herd of the sick and abnormal. Our traitorous elites are sick and the sheep are abnormal. The former deserves no mercy and the latter deserves no aid.
“Tough for them, and good on any Russell Crowe-like “Maoris” who fight on our (my) side. Exclusivist racial nationalism is a sure loser, operational nationalism a sure winner.”
I am not sure if I comfortably agree with accepting even a 1/16th of Southern Pacific Islander/Australoid blood.The Australoid sub-species is even more primitive than Blacks!
But, I do absolutely agree with accepting White Americans with some ancestry from Brown Caucasians, Yellow Asians, and those-Oranges and Reds-indigenous to Canada (&Alaska) and the Continetal U.S. I can also accept Americans with a 1/16th or at least 1/32th Tropical AmerIndian or Black ancestry.
Wouldn’t FreeRepublic be a better site for CompassionateFascist? They too oppose racial preservation, advocate for the “proposition nation,” and gush about their non-white allies.
I wouldn’t go that far. I think what he is saying that if it comes to a fight, we shouldn’t quibble over so-and-so having one American Indian grandfather or this other guy having a Mexican great-grandmother, so long as such persons are: 1) fighting on our side, and 2) self-identify legitimately as White.
I think what he is saying that if it comes to a fight, we shouldn’t quibble over so-and-so having one American Indian grandfather or this other guy having a Mexican great-grandmother, so long as such persons are: 1) fighting on our side, and 2) self-identify legitimately as White.
Perhaps your interpretation is correct, but based on CompassionateFascist’s previous comments, I think you and Steve in the Swamps are misinterpreting him. He is not talking about people with a small, distant amount of non-white ancestry. He is talking about an anti-Jewish rainbow coalition. CompassionateFascist has derogatorily called a white ethnostate a “bantustan” and dismissed race as mere “skin color.”
“CompassionateFascist has derogatorily called a white ethnostate a “bantustan” and dismissed race as mere ‘skin color.'”
That doesn’t sound good!
Of course, the racially educated know pigmentation is actually one of the least significant biological determinants of race.
Well, if that’s the case, then I don’t agree with that at all. What is required is a North-American-European state, which absolutely does not rely in any way on non-Euro-American labor in any shape, manner or form.
I am not sure if I comfortably agree with accepting even a 1/16th of Southern Pacific Islander/Australoid blood.The Australoid sub-species is even more primitive than Blacks!
1/16th is pretty small and Im not sure that the Maoris are quite down there with blacks, certainly not in the same class as the Australian aboriginals. Plus I suspect a big percentage of those now classified as Maori have some white ancestry.
Wouldn’t FreeRepublic be a better site for CompassionateFascist? They too oppose racial preservation, advocate for the “proposition nation,” and gush about their non-white allies.
I don’t think they’re as into discussing the impending civil war as CF though.
9Whites Unite
“the 1991 version with Kevin Costner”
The presence of Kevin Costner is the sure sign of an anti-white movie:
Tombstone
How is Tombstone anti-White?
Kevin Costner was in a different version called Wyatt Earp.
10AngloSaxon
#7, if you thought the 1991 movie was bad, did you know the BBC has TV series on both Robin Hood and King Arthur where Friar Tuck and Guinevere are black? Okay King Arthur is more legend but a black queen in ancient Britain is even more fanciful.
I read about that and it’s just disgusting. It’s a shame how disgraceful the media in Britain behave, they’re worse than America.
12CompassionateFascist
Yes, when push comes to shove in America, many if not most white sheeple are going to be on the wrong side of the barricades. Tough for them, and good on any Russell Crowe-like “Maoris” who fight on our (my) side. Exclusivist racial nationalism is a sure loser, operational nationalism a sure winner.
Considering racialism is by definition exclusivist that would be absurd and defeat the point.
15Steve in the Swamps
I am not sure if I comfortably agree with accepting even a 1/16th of Southern Pacific Islander/Australoid blood.The Australoid sub-species is even more primitive than Blacks!
I can also accept Americans with a 1/16th or at least 1/32th Tropical AmerIndian or Black ancestry.
You mean no more than. 🙂
As a minimum we should use the South’s former miscegenation laws and legal standard of White: 1/16th Amerindian/Mongoloid or less, and the one-drop rule for blacks. Looking White didn’t necessarily mean you were White, as Plessy v. Ferguson established. Other countries may differ in their standards.
Lopez Tonight does DNA tests for some of their guests who consent with some surprising results. Larry David is more Amerindian than Jessica Alba?! Oy vey! Lopez is a mixture of all 4 major ancestral groups, he’s black!
Excellent essay, Albert. You’ve got a real talent for both writing and grasping important ideas. I’ll also say that, however frustrating they may be, the sheep are in fact worth it. There are many reasons for this, but only one is required: each generation of white sheep manages to produce at least some white lions. No other sheep in the world can do that, as such it is essential that they survive.
Also, Kievsky #8, very good post.
Altough i agree that most aren’t worth it, our descendants don’t deserve the wicked fate that awaits them if the globalists get their way. That’s the reason i’m never going to lie down.
As for where to go, whether we reclaim some of our countries or secede/separate from existing ones the important part will be the ability to defend ourselves. Because i’m sure they’ll never leave us alone, they’ll do to a white ethnostate/country what they did to Serbia. Or Germany for that matter…
Pardon me for this catty comment, but Kate Blanchett is a bit old (40) to be playin’ MAID Marian. Other than that, looks like just my sort of movie!
It is a bit of a stretch, but she’s a serious cougar, she can pull it off.
http://screencrave.frsucrave.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Robin-Hood-Russell-Crowe-and-Cate-Blanchett-14-12-09-kc.jpg
They considered Sienna Miller before her, but allegedly Scott dumped her because she would make Crowe look old and fat.
I saw ads for the BBC King Arthur and thought “Guinevere” was a bit swart for someone whose name is derived from Welsh words meaning “white” and “smooth”. It appears to be the standard operational template today to invert our myths into their opposites- like the negro Heimdall in the Thor movie.
It appears to be the standard operational template today to invert our myths into their opposites- like the negro Heimdall in the Thor movie.
Diversity quotas are even more powerful than Odin!
Yeah, it’s ridiculous. Especially egregious considering Heimdall is called the “whitest of the gods.”
Great read.
“I was very young when I noticed that in life there are, broadly speaking, two general classes of people. The Responsible, a very tiny minority, selected not by class or background but by nature or, if you’d prefer, by God, whose thankless task it is to care about everything and anything; and The Sheep, the vast majority, whose pleasurable task it is to simply live and take everything at face value.”
Wow, I wish I could sum up complex issues like that in as few sentences. I could not agree more.
Cues from the Jews
by David Yeagley · April 16, 2010 · 20 Comments ·
My sense of American Patriotism is based on three things: early childhood sentiments, Jewish history, and being Comanche. I know there are many people who wonder about the origins of my ideas and feelings, so, I want to lay out the foundations, as I myself perceive them, and the way I account for them. I realize that others may have different explanations. The Lord is judge, and I believe His judgement is a bit more than the sum of any collective opinion.
My parents loved America. My father, though never professing a specific religion, had a profound and visceral sense of the sacred. He was a WWII army veteran (marksman). He had respect. My mother absolutely loved God and America, and, like most Indians, had a special love for that American flag itself. It represented the strong men in her life, I think.
My first day in kindergarten, at Linwood School in OKC, I remember when I said the Pledge of Allegiance for the first time, aloud, with a group of other children. There were tears in my eyes. It was so intense, so grand, so glorious a thing, beyond anything I could imagine. It was “the country” we touched. And that word “nation” was paired with the name of God Almighty. Oh, the glory of that moment! I shall never forget it. I was five years old. This is the heritage my parents left me.
Mordecai Kaplan, 1881-1983. Co-founder of Reconstructionist Judaism.
My mother taught me the Bible also. I have to say, I have studied the Bible all my life, professionally and privately; at Yale Divinity, and on my own bed at night. I find the Jewish experience exemplary–for better, or for worse. This is the people, the nation, chosen as the great ‘test tube baby’ of the Lord. This was the display before all the world–of the way in which God interacts with individuals and with nations. The worst possible things that could be said about Jewish people are in the Bible. The best possible things that can be said about Jewish people are also in the Bible. It’s not as if divine prejudice spares any aspect of the experience! The coming and passing of nations, of empires, and of individual families, and people, are all exposed for what they are, and aren’t. There are no punches pulled, and no holds barred. I, for one, come out absolutely affined to the Jews. My sympathies are natural, compulsive, and overwhelming. All that I know of the Lord, I know by virtue of the Jewish experience. The Bible is the record of Jewish experience.
In that experience is ethnicity, and all that entails. As a Comanche Indian, I am most attuned to that disposition. A people; an ethnicity; a “race,” as it were; this is a primary experience. Though God relates to the individual, He also relates to the ethnicity–the larger group. The Bible is a record of perfect balance in regard to those relations.
Mordecai Kaplan, co-founder of the Reconstructionist movement in modern Judaism, wrote about this balance in The Meaning of God in Modern Jewish Religion (New York: Reconstructionist Press, 1962), p. 53:
Although to every individual the achievement of personal salvation is his supreme quest and responsibility, it is unattainable without devotion to the task of social salvation.
This personal objective of human conduct cannot, however, be achieved without reference to a social objective as well. Selfish salvation is an impossibility, because no human being is psychologically self-sufficient.
No, race or ethnicity is not the only “group” identity an individual may have; one’s “nation,” however, is a principal identity. I believe nationhood is ordained of God, and that the nations are therefore sacred. They are not to be disdained, maliciously manipulated, or otherwise toyed with. This includes race. Until the phenomenon of modern American, nationhood was always based on ethnicity, (and language, and religion). I seriously question the propriety of interracial marriage, and certainly bastard mixes–racial mixes produces mindlessly, without marriage or family in mind or involved. Race is a fundamental element of nationhood. It cannot be ignored. I, for one, do not believe America should be reduced to an ideology of freedom, though its government is based on it. I do not believe America should be abstracted to a principle of plurality, in the name of equality. (This is a mere Communist ploy.)
Again, as a Comanche Indian, I have an intuition, or an instinct, about the natural propensity for race and the base of nationhood. It would never occur to anyone that a non-Comanche, even an Indian of another American tribe, could be chief of the Comanches, or would even think he could be. A lying, alien, black African Communist certainly could never hope to be chief of the Comanche tribe. One such person became president of the United States because of the Communist nature of the Democrat Party, and the social infection it has been spreading in the American culture for the last eighty years. No white man, or no American Indian, would ever think of trying to become president of Kenya, or Nigeria, or Bujumbura. No such denigration of race exists there. Only in America is race reduced to a mere political ploy, in the name of equality. This is Communist racism at its finest.
No Gentile would ever become Prime Minister of Israel. This, I say, to all the liberal Jews in America. I realize the intellectual tradition of contradistinction in the Jewish Community. It’s a lot older than Hillel and Shammai, too. I think it goes back to the rebellion of Korah against Moses. (Numbers 16.) Different, contrasting ideas are not always based on competition and envy, but, contrasting ideas always exist. The Jewish management of this element of human nature represents probably the most careful, intelligent, and productive activity in the intellectual history of man. In a very real sense, the history of the world is an in-house Jewish dialogue.
But this is my personal mysticism, perhaps. The point here is that I do feel called upon to account for why I see things the way I do. This is my attempt to make that account. My parents, the Bible (Jews), and the Comanches, are my frame of reference, and my source of inspiration. My parents are no longer living, so I don’t know how they would feel about me at this point. I certainly don’t represent the sole interpretation of scripture, nor the paramount exegesis thereof. My ideas about Jewish people I can only pray are not harmful to Jewish people, or aberrant any too much. My Comanche intutions are just that–intuitions. The governmental process we have operating now is a diseased hybrid of superimposed white policy over the original and unique Comanche social psyche. I suspect Morecai Kaplin would not approve of the BIA management of the Indian tribes. The “social salvation” he would assert would be indeed impossible given the present tribal government. But that’s another issue.
My mother and father, Norma and Ned, married in 1946, in OKC.
So, I present these matters, not as an excuse for anything, but as an explanation for why I think and feel like I do. This pertains to my social commentary, and the values I have learned and chosen over the years. I know that whatever is truly valuable costs. Sacrifice is the basis of all good, of all true accomplishment. Personal sacrifice. That’s what makes the society a high moral quality. Not to say that the Communist deprivation tyrannically imposed by Barry’s Boys in DC is in any way akin to personal sacrifice, but rather, if true moral character–which involves sacrifice–were restored to the American psyche, the aberration of Barry’s Boys would never have evolved. Barry “Obama” Soetoro represents a degeneration, not an achievement of the American psyche. It is the result of years of delusion, propaganda, and error. The Negro mascot only diverts the truth through racial entertainment.
Yes, it is difficult for one to show charity and tolerance when the country one loves is being destroyed. It is difficult to sound kind when one is voicing the fears of the imperiled collective soul. There is a time to build, and a time to break down. There is a time to heal, and a time to kill. (Ecclesiastes 3.) Are these things a matter of interpretation? There would be no American nation if people hadn’t made some stark, daring, sacrificial decisions. Are Americans capable of such decisions today? Can we act on motives of personal salvation equal to those of social salvation? Can we act
independently of media movements, liberal or conservative? Do American people have a soul? I think maybe that is the real question, at this point.
Has media stolen that soul? I’m afraid that’s what the old Indians would say. In the beginning, when daguerreotypes and photographs were first introduced to them, they never wanted their pictures taken, because they believed that picture somehow stole their spirit, and left them powerless.
Posted by David Yeagley · April 16, 2010 · 9:05 am CT
http://www.badeagle.com/
I demand equality from Hollywood! Cast Johnny Depp or Brad Pitt as a runaway slave in 1830s Alabama.
There are only three possible outcomes: (1) Most likely, the power elite “elect a new people” and the U.S. becomes a Latin American country with a sizeable European-American minority; (2) the system collapses as the Soviet Union did; or (3) Euro-Americans give up on the U.S. and fight for a new homeland, with a new nationalism and nationalist ideal.
1 has been what I saw as most likely as well. But the other day I was thinking about it, and it smacked me between the eyes: Britons aren’t Spaniards. We’re the ones who wrote the Magna Carta, not the ones who spawned a vast new mixed race. Beneath our civility is a racial snobbery I’m not sure Spaniards ever had. Combined with that is a certain freedom-loving attitude, one I’m not sure is compatible with the white(ish) rule you see in Latin America. Iberians have a long history of mixing, and it shows. Britons don’t, and that shows too.
Postman didn’t strike me as anti-white. If anything, it was implicitly white. Yeah, the bad guys were white racists, but did anyone else notice how little was made of that in the movie? If you went for a piss at the right time you missed it. And, aside from the obligatory young black male who can’t act his way out of a paper bag, the entire cast was white.
Awesome. Can’t wait to see this. I love historical movies. I’m sure the critics are already saying this film suffers from an appalling lack of diversity!
Yeah, a trend I’ve noticed is that as “diversity” crawls into every space it can conceivably infest, historical films have gained market share. Coincidence? Maybe.
Really good writing here Mr. Jackson. You have hit the ball out of the park on your last two essays. Keep up the good work.
#7, if you thought the 1991 movie was bad, did you know the BBC has TV series on both Robin Hood and King Arthur where Friar Tuck and Guinevere are black? Okay King Arthur is more legend but a black queen in ancient Britain is even more fanciful.
Yeah BBC doesn’t see any reason “diversity” can’t infest quasi-historical films. I saw BBC’s RH and wanted to vomit when I saw they were pairing the young blond Arthur with the ugly mulatto Gwinny-vere. There’s something seriously wrong at BBC. It’s like they think they’re going to be the next Hollywood if they rub Jew-sweat all over themselves, cast darkies in the most inappropriate roles possible, and thrust perverse sexual relationships under our noses. EVERY BBC series from the 90s on that I’ve rented has done this. Hex (can’t remember if it’s a BBC production) starts off with the pretty blond slaveholder’s daughter sneaking off to screw a slave; in the first season of Torchwood we’re treated to a time travel story with the male lead (who’s “not a homosexual”) sucking face with a WWII fighter ace (a two-fer; homos are good, oh and your ancestral heroes were homos); King Arthur is a coal burner and Camelot is spiced with darkies; Robin Hood was a Moor-lover and his best “man” was a Moor cross-dresser; Doctor Who’s gal (blond, of course) was shacked up with a darkie who she has an on-again, off-again relationship with; Survivors were led by a numinous negro male (they’re so desperate for blacks in England they have to use one with a lazy eye), plagued by a problematic blond white guy, and the Paki beds down with the blond girl (one brunette is too busy being a dyke, and the other is too busy being the implied love interest for the black guy); I’m sure there are more but those are the ones I can remember.
BBC goes further than American television, and they’re only 10% non-white last I heard. If you went by the BBC’s demographics, you’d assume Britain was at least 1/3 non-white. I guess that’s the plan.
Mark said: “It is a bit of a stretch, but she’s a serious cougar, she can pull it off.”
Eh. It’s gonna be hard to believe she’s a “maiden” — a cougar, yeah sure, but MAID Marian? Not that I don’t like Kate Blanchett, but they ought to have gone for a more age-appropriate actress.
Don’t forget the recent casting of a black actress as Tattycoram in the BBC’s latest “Little Dorrit.”
I’ve just stopped watching any “costume dramas” made after around 1990-95. It’s just irritating.
This essay is beautiful. The characterization of the masses is frustratingly accurate.
Svi – I enjoy Dr Who but they are so desparate to be diverse its painful – and they trip themselves up.
In one period episode Martha is a matter of comment in London because she is black (a rarity apparently). In another, all sorts of non-whites are about in Ye Olde London Towne and nobody bats an eyelid.
They want the kudos of speaking truth to power, highlighting Britain’s shameful all-white past and the kudos of speaking truth to power, highlighting the ‘fact’ that minorities have always been with is.
“Beneath our civility is a racial snobbery I’m not sure Spaniards ever had.”
The best evidence is that Spaniards killed far more Non-Whites in North American than the English did.
The problem was that Spaniards settled parts of the Western Hemisphere with far higher population densities than those parts settled by the English, and that the Spanish were much more reluctant to send their Women across the Atlantic Ocean in rickety boats (partly for demographic reasons).
Also most of America and all of Canada was too far North for the importation of Black Slaves to work, whereas nearly everywhere the Spanish settled had the climate for Plantations.
“Combined with that is a certain freedom-loving attitude, one I’m not sure is compatible with the white(ish) rule you see in Latin America.”
That’s true. You can’t have a White and/or Whitoid elite ruling over seething masses of Non-Whites while still maintaining all those ideals of Liberty that English type Whites tend to care about more than other Whites do.
Or at least, tended to care about more.
The English don’t seem to mind living in a nearly total Police State very much, at least not enough for more than 10% to do so much as vote for the BNP.
Unless they show some resistance soon, it may indicate that English descended Whites in America will follow their lead.
“…if you thought the 1991 movie was bad, did you know the BBC has TV series on both Robin Hood and King Arthur where Friar Tuck and Guinevere are black?”
Lucy Griffiths doesn’t look Black to me.
I never watched that Robin Hood version but Ive been checking out Lucy Griffiths.
She looks very anglo/celtic to me, hard to imagine much non-white ancestry there.
Replying to previous posts generated by my #12 on Operational Nationalism:
1. #13, Albert Jackson: “I like that term and the idea behind it”. Good. Then you understand what I mean. ON is phase I. The behavioral alliance-building necessary to bring down ZOG and its jewish, black, brown, asiatic, and white adherants. You can see this sort of thing in-process at alternativeright. This done, a further sifting may occur. But first things first.
2. #15, SteveInTheSwamp: “1/16th, 1/32” of this and that race; “Australoid sub-species is even more primitive than blacks”. Yes, and things are soon going to get very primitive indeed in the U.S. If I am at the next Concord Bridge, looking at a platoon of ZOG-enforcers coming down the road, do I want a quivering WN intellectual of the AmRen stripe who can’t even name the Jew standing next to me, or do I want a Jew-hating gangbanger who knows which end of a gun the bullet comes out of and is aiming it in the same direction I am? I’ll deal with secondary racial issues after prime racial issue is resolved: breaking the power of organized Jewry. In fact, if an apostate Jew or two shows up on our (my) side of the barricade, well and good.
3. #16, MGLS: “wouldn’t FreeRepublic be a better site for CompassionateFascist?They too….”, etc. I am for white racial preservation, and at a most visceral level. Today, driving my cab around town, I saw three black-white couples. Black males with white females. Good-looking white females. I had all I could do to prevent myself from driving up onto the sidewalk. And the “proposition nation”, i.e., neo-con “credential nationalism”? ON is about BEHAVIOR, not “values”. I do not care what some one “believes”. I judge people by what they do. If they do what I like, then I like them. If they do what I do not like, then I do not like them. “Non-white allies”? Since it is beyond obvious that most whites in America are not now WN and are not going to be for some time – in fact, most are and will remain sheep for the shearing – I will take whatever support I can get for what I want to do, and take it from wherever it comes. The idea is to win, not intellectualize.
4. Albert Jackson, #17: Yes on 1, No on 2. Someone’s “self-identification” means nothing to me. Gangbanger with gun can identify with Azatlan, for all I care. Just so long as he aims the gun in the same direction I aim mine. Once ZOG is gone, then we deal with Azatlan.
5. MGLS/Steve, #18/19: in “CF’s previous comments he has derogatorily called a white ethnostate a ‘bantustan’ and dismissed race as mere ‘skin color'”. Precisely. We are in a zer-sum game. We either take the country back, all of it, or we lose all. If some Jews, blacks, mestizos, whomever, are still living here when the dust settles, I don’t care….just so long as they are no longer calling the shots and can no longer threaten us with racial extinction. Back around 1900, maybe a little earlier, Vienna had a proto-fascist Mayor named Karl Leugar. He was once reproached for having a few Jews on his team. He replied, “I decide who is a Jew, and who isn’t.” I’ll put it in a way even a WN can understand. You are thinking horizontally. I am thinking vertically.
6. Lurker, #22, on Maoris. In NZ, ferocious white colonialists and ferocious Maori natives fought each other to a bloody standstill, then intermarried. Their call, not mine. Toughest Empire division in N. Africa, WW II, was 2nd NZ, which included a large Maori component. Rommel did not like them. When they killed, they took the ears as trophies. I like these guys. Without mostly Moroccan Spanish Foreign Legion (who took other body parts), Franco would not have been able to defeat the communists in Spanish Civil War. Again, you take your allies as, where, and how you find them.
7. #23, Gussie F-N: saw your post at zerohedge.com before I came over here. Nice job. All intelligent WNs – if there are any – should check out zerohedge. Good hardright economic pieces by Wall Street High (and Low) Rollers, plus wild and interesting threads.
Lucy Griffiths played Morgaine or somesuch, not Gwinny-vere. Gwinny-vere was some sort of negroid mystery meat, and flat-out ugly to boot (a mysteriously common occurrence on British television). She might’ve been a subcon for all I know.
We’re the ones who wrote the Magna Carta, not the ones who spawned a vast new mixed race. Beneath our civility is a racial snobbery I’m not sure Spaniards ever had. Combined with that is a certain freedom-loving attitude, one I’m not sure is compatible with the white(ish) rule you see in Latin America. Iberians have a long history of mixing, and it shows. Britons don’t, and that shows too.
Indeed, they practiced limpieza de sangre or a racially mixed caste system, similar to India. They never opposed mixing, just categorizing the various mixtures.
The Basques in contrast regard themselves as pure, separate from the “miscegenated” Spaniards.
33John
I demand equality from Hollywood! Cast Johnny Depp or Brad Pitt as a runaway slave in 1830s Alabama.
In the old Westerns they had Italians play Indians.
Then there was blackface.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/robinhood/characters/tuck.shtml
Tuck
played by David Harewood
ROFL! GTO of here!
They don’t even bother to alter his storyline to explain why he’s a Congoid.