A Path To Redemption

by Val Koinen
August 28, 2010

A brief message regarding the plight of White people in America and the world over – and especially concerning our dispossession and impending extinction…

My efforts as an essayist have always been to foster awakening and an awareness of (knowing and understanding) racial differences and the influences of Jews on White society.

Yes, we obviously need those things. They provide the keys to a necessary rebirth of our people; to our redemption. But it must be recognized, if we hope to survive, that we need so much more than that. Ultimately, ours is a lost cause, and we are a doomed people, if we do not have genuine:
– Reverence for the truth, and a thirst for knowledge about things that really matter; that are at least as strong as our pursuit of pleasure, inanities, and diversion.
– A renewed toughness in conjunction with a strong survival instinct.
Loyalty to our own people; to our kinsmen and our shared heritage – to the extent of having genuine pride in who we are and what our people have accomplished over the centuries. And respect and deep, heartfelt appreciation for the price our ancestors paid down through history.

Think about those concepts. Teach them to your children. Spread the word to your relatives, friends, and acquaintances.

If you do those things we have a chance; if you do not, our branch of humanity – the greatest the world has ever known – is as good as dead.


  1. From http://cambriawillnotyield.blogspot.com/

    Year after year the pro-lifers put out books and pamphlets arguing that there is no constitutional right to abortion, and year after year the liberals say, “Yes, there is a constitutional right to abortion.” What is the pro-life response to the liberals? They keep writing more pamphlets and exercising their right to protest, democratically of course. In other words, the “pro-lifers” – or more appropriately, the constitutionalists – concede that there is nothing they can do to stop legalized abortion, because every year they make their constitutional points and then run and hide when the liberals say, “Abortion is a constitutional right.”

    We should put the same question to the immigration restrictionists in Arizona and Hazelton, Pennsylvania: “Now that the courts have said you can’t restrict Aztecs from invading your town and your state, what is your recourse?”

    The Southern secessionists suffered through the same process that the constitutionalist pro-lifers and the constitutionalist immigration restrictionists are now suffering through. Any fair-minded person then and now would concede that the U.S. Constitution provided for secession from the Union, but a constitutional right is just a paper-and-ink abstraction if it is not backed up by a people and a tradition. The Northern, Unitarian, utopian tradition was more powerful than the Southern, Christian tradition. And in politics the powerful, not the constitutionally or morally correct, rule.

    These are not little issues, the murder of the innocents and the invasion of the barbarians, which an honorable man can pacifistically ignore. Europeans used to fight wars to stop the murder of innocents and the invasion of their countries. Is murder and invasion any less conscionable if it is sanctioned by a state tribunal? We are faced with the tragic spectacle of conservative groups endlessly citing the Constitution to correct evils, while the liberal hierarchy ignores the Constitution and works to maintain and expand what really matters to them – their power. When a people no longer have a common religious faith they become a collection of lawyers poring over documents. The governing body of a people without a faith seeks to fill the moral void in the nation with documents. The more immoral a regime, the more documents that regime produces. Whittaker Chambers in his book Witness tells of the endless documentation the Soviet leaders put out in order to prove their legitimacy. If Khrushchev and Gorbachev had not undermined the documentation of their precursors it is quite probable that the Soviet Union would still be standing today.

    Documentation works. Charlie Brown is not deceived by Lucy’s promise to hold the football steady while he kicks it, until she shows him a signed document in which she pledges not to remove the football while he is attempting a kick. We know how that turns out: “This document was never notarized.”

    Butterfield in his The Englishman and His History states that the Magna Charta only became important to the English people many, many years after its signing. It wasn’t important till Englishmen began to lose faith in their traditions. Then they sought to replace their loss of faith with a document. The United States started out with a document instead of a traditional faith, because the founding fathers had no faith in the traditions of their British ancestors. It was the rank and file European Americans who carried the real European traditions, the Christian traditions, over to this country. When the docu-men at the top destroyed those Christian traditions, the reign of Satan began.

    We owe nothing, as a Christian people, to the United States Constitution. There is no reason to acquiesce to the rule of Satan simply because the liberals wave a document in our face that they take out of the closet when it suits their purpose and throw back into the closet when it doesn’t suit their purpose. What we owe allegiance to is traditional Europe, the Europe created by the union of Christ and the European. When a nation enters the democratic era of its existence it has entered the final phase of its existence. When a people are spiritually healthy, they are a hero-and-story-book nation. When they tell of their history, they tell of the heroes of their race. They tell the story of Alfred the Great, of William Tell, of The Cid; they do not talk about their new and improved democratic government unless they have become a non-people, having replaced a belief in the heroes of their race and the Hero-God of their race with a belief in a non-personal, Universalist system of government.

  2. Pushing the anti-abortion whacko agenda alienates an awful lot of normal people who know abortion is a legitimate medical procedure for teenage girls who get pregnant and aren’t in a position where being pregnant for 9 months or starting a family is a viable option.

  3. Robert Reis is correct: “Rights” are imaginary. The question will be whether the current economic situation will force people, perhaps some influencial people, to throw off their brainwashing and develop some courage and act in a new way.

  4. Nightowl: It ought to be remembered that the pro-abortion crowd is also the “Let’s ensure that all 15 year old girls are screwing every week” crowd. They actually WANT girls to get pregnant, so they can then have abortions. They promote abortion not because they believe in any sort of rights, but to break apart the family, leaving people weakened and alone before the State.

  5. “Reverence for the truth, and a thirst for knowledge . . . A renewed toughness and a strong survival instinct . . . Loyalty to our own people and our shared heritage.”

    Them’s fine words indeed, but I can’t help but think it’s little more than a pipe-dream. I mean, look around . . .

  6. Much of what he says is correct, and very inspiring. However this part is wrong:

    If the young woman in my class who was not exceptionally perceptive saw that democracy did not work, why can’t the powers that be of the democratic West see that it doesn’t work? Is it because something obstructs their vision? Or is it because they do not want to see clearly? I think it is the latter.

    For the jews in charge and their mega-rich race-traitor WASP buddies, democrazy works just fine! It facilitates white dispossesion, financial destruction and eventually racial extinction. They tried using totalitarian Communism to the same ends over in Russia but that didn’t work out so hot for them as the whole thing collapsed prematurely.

Comments are closed.