The Teleprompter Deficit


True story.

Even as the polls show Obama slipping across the swing states and falling behind Romney, his aides have pulled him off the campaign trail for five days in mid-October to prepare for the second debate.

What’s the most racist thing a political pundit could say about the 2012 election? Obama lacks the intelligence to compete with Romney on stage without his teleprompter constantly feeding him lines from his advisors.

The Obama team obviously fears that Romney will challenge him again and that he will lose the election in the next two debates. They are trying to massage and stimulate his brain to do the work normally performed by the teleprompter.

The absence of Obama’s teleprompter is Romney’s October Surprise.

About Hunter Wallace 12380 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent


  1. Someone in the audience will hold up an iPad with Obama’s script on it. Or a mischievous GOP aide with a pad will Ron Burgundy-like give him a fake script to read.

    “I have lived my life figuring out ways to ingratiate myself with gullible whites, it’s worked so well for me so far. I will continue a pace with this hookwinkery by renaming Washinton DC to become Martin Luther Kingston. We will continue to waste and squander your cash on feckless hopeless negroe children in public education so help us god!”

  2. There’s another thing I caught in the Biden debate.

    BIDEN: “We went out and rescued General Motors.”

    If I recall correctly GM was in the process of being bailed out long before Obama took office. In fact Bush was the prime mover on keeping the together under chapter 11.
    Whatever you think of the GM subsidy it had its roots in policy that predates Obama.

  3. He must be in deep trouble with his internal polls if he’s sequestering himself like this.
    One thing about Romney is that he is probably greeting in some flesh press time as we write.

    He looks like he is pretty good at being personable from the footage I’ve seen. Very chummy and engaged. The man is enjoying himself.

  4. What needs to be pointed out is that Obama is lagging, while his white surrogates are making a strong case for reelection (Biden, Clinton come to mind). Obama is the Affirmative Action President!

    Obama off of the campaign trail is also good for his campaign, IMO.

    Tuesday is important for the outcome of this election, if Obama comes close to a draw, the media will call it a draw, as Lew points out.

    And in the last debate, Obama will “win” no matter what happens.

    Read this from Jewish scripture:

    8 Then came Amalek, and fought with Israel in Rephidim. 9And Moses said unto Joshua, Choose us out men, and go out, fight with Amalek: to morrow I will stand on the top of the hill with the rod of God in mine hand. 10So Joshua did as Moses had said to him, and fought with Amalek: and Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the hill. 11And it came to pass, when Moses held up his hand, that Israel prevailed: and when he let down his hand, Amalek prevailed. 12But Moses’ hands were heavy; and they took a stone, and put it under him, and he sat thereon; and Aaron and Hur stayed up his hands, the one on the one side, and the other on the other side; and his hands were steady until the going down of the sun. 13And Joshua discomfited Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword.

    14And the LORD said unto Moses, Write this for a memorial in a book, and rehearse it in the ears of Joshua: for I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven. 15And Moses built an altar, and called the name of it Jehovahnissi: 16For he said, Because the LORD hath sworn that the LORD will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.

    Is not Amalek representative of White America?

    Is not Joshua Obama?

    Is not Moses the main stream media?

    Figure also this from Numbers 24:

    Out of Jacob shall come he that shall have dominion, and shall destroy him that remaineth of the city.

    And when he looked on Amalek, he took up his parable, and said, Amalek was the first of the nations; but his latter end shall be that he perish for ever.

  5. He’s certainly compared himself to Joshua before, standing infront of a nignog congregation. Moses was the MLK stand in.

    Was this also a subliminal appeal to Jews? Probably.

    Amelekica. Hahaha.

  6. It is hilarious to watch Obama run away and hide after his recent asswhipping.
    How typically negro to sulk…probably mumbling to himself about “evil white debbils” right now. Makes you smile, doesn’t it?

    The symbolic importance of a Romney win will provoke a massive sulk-a-thon among the blackandbrown’s. I can’t wait until the chimpout of Obama himself happens soon. The pressure is building. When will the mocha messiah explode?

    This is going to be good…it might not be the most important election in recent years, but it has certainly been the most entertaining.

    Deo Vindice

  7. The pressure will be on Obama. Ordinarily, I would say Romney ought to come out swinging. He ought try to rattle Obama’s cage from the start by saying something outrageous. 5 years of scripted teleprompter comments and softball questions from a sympathetic media may have caught up with Obama.

    The problem is the format. It’s a “town hall” format which favors Obama. In front an audience of average Joes, one of Romney’s advantages is neutralized. He might not be able to be as aggressive. No doubt the debate organizers will be obsessive about making sure plenty of women and non-whites get to ask questions. I wouldn’t be surprised if most of the questions from white males are from white men over 55 overweight or otherwise unattractive men. It would subtly reinforce the leftist frame that only “angry white men” vote Republican.

    I would imagine going up against Romney can be intimidating. Romney needs to take advantage. He is 6’2 or 3 to begin with, and a mean SOB too (remember he organized a gay bashing in high school). Romney is also smarter, better looking and richer all at the same time. Aesthetics and optics matter.

  8. Lew says:
    ‘The problem is the format. It’s a “town hall” format which favors Obama.’

    I despise the “town hall” format. Usually a bunch of whiny losers asking lame questions.

    Mr. Romney, how would you bring us together?

    Mr. Romney, why do you hate poor people?

    Mr. Romney, why didn’t you leave the racist Mormon church?

    Mr. Obama, why do the Republicans stand in the way of progress?

    Mr. Obama, thank you fo da phone and EBT card. You saved my life.

  9. Some of what we know (or are highly confident of):
    1. Half-white, husband on the “down low”, gay, black man Obama is a dull person when compared with his competition (both in intelligence and in his motivation, and even interests). In effect, he and his wife are a great example of affirmative action in practice.
    2. He is also off the charts arrogant (combined with being slightly above average intelligence and completely incompetent; he is truly a massively overconfident dolt).
    3. He has no empathy or sympathy (I think the term is narcissistic; but I would classify Barry as extreme if not delusion on this count).
    4. His primary financial supporters and handlers are mostly Jewish and various other associated cultural Marxist types (e.g., most, if not all, the mainstream media); and they want him to win or they wouldn’t continue to support him.

    Given his known personality, he is able to completely contradict himself in almost the same sentence and not bat an eye. That is, this is natural for him. For example, he even indicated that he though he won the debate. That may be the one honest comment he has made this year and fits his known twisted psychological profile. What to expect in the second debate with a change in the format, not much of a change except for the format change. He known personality type would seem to indicate that he is almost incapable of modifying his behavior no matter how much his smarter Jewish handlers tell him what to say and do at certain points (actually, he would need psychologically to show them he is the smart Nigga; otherwise, he will likely blame them if anything goes wrong – a win-win for him lose or win). He is largely incapable of differentiating what he says one minute to the next. If I was Romney I’d simply spend the next two “debates” pointing out inconsistencies as he talks and stuffing him with them (not that the RINO Romney isn’t inconsistent, he is just better at hiding it and not nearly as obviously inconsistent in a normal debate format). Most likely, and as pointed out, he and his handlers will claim victory no matter what happens; yet, given his personality alone, he is largely incapable of an actual debate.

  10. Bonus excellent post. The main reason to get Obama out is that at gut level he probably cares nothing when whites get capped. I am beginning to suspect he enjoys it.

    Biden, is himself a neocon so I don’t think Obama will be able to resist the pressure to bomb Iran anyway.

  11. No policy direction will be changed, regardless of which of these idiots is elected. What is constant is that each succeeding administration ramps up the agenda at least by a level. Again, this is regardless of which salesman sits in DC.

    White men need to have their heads bashed against a brick wall constantly until they get it. They need to see that nigga, they’re at the least uncomfortable with, as the symbol of their government 24/7.

    Of course Romney is capable of winning debates with Obongo, as McCain was if he had intended to win. Who knows what the deciders have or haven’t decided? I’m still guessing it’s Fetchit.

    The important thing is to bring all of this crap to a disagreeable head. Having that monkey in office for four more years ought to contribute to that.

    IOW, having a Romney as a symbol of their government the frog ain’t gonna notice the heat being turned up.

    I haven’t watched any of these “debates”. They don’t mean a thing. If they did, Ron Paul would be a shoe in.

Comments are closed.