The following essay was written by Jost Turner, an American Viet Nam veteran, who founded a White folk community – NS Kindred in the Mountains of Northern California. Jost worked briefly in the open American White Nationalist “movement” but he became very disillusioned with the selfish, dysfunctional people in “The Movement”. Jost sought to discover and live authentic, Indo-European religions as practices by Indo-Europeans in India, Persia, Greek areas of modern Turkey and Europe during the last golden age. This article has been edited, recognizing the American negative bias associated with anything related to German National Socialism. – Jack Ryan
Firearms: The Great Equalizer by Jost
Clearly, violations of the laws regarding possession and use of firearms have been responsible for sending more White racialists to prison than anything else. There are probably thousands of different firearms laws in this country, all varying from state to state, county to county and city to city. Most of these laws are blatantly ill-written, but enforced with the fervor of an inquisition. Petty firearms violations were used as the government’s justification to attack both Randy Weaver and the Waco Davidians. Without a doubt, possession of firearms is the greatest danger to White racialists in general, and to Folk-communities in particular.
Nevertheless, we strongly encourage all (White Americans), especially our women and even our children, to be armed and highly skilled in the use of firearms. This is because the country is being invaded by hordes of criminals and gangs from Non-White countries notorious for violence and savagery. Neither the government nor the police are making any real effort to protect the public from these lowly evolved creatures, and so it is quite likely that we all will have to deal with them ourselves sooner or later.
Being armed is very effective against criminals and gangs. This was dramatically proven during the Los Angeles Rodney King riots. Invariably, the mere presence of a firearm was enough to send the rampaging gangs in the opposite direction – actually firing the weapon was unnecessary. This is because criminals ang gang members are by nature extremely selfish, indulgent and really quite cowardly. Hence, they prey only on the weak. However, they do not look on a man or woman with a firearm as “weak prey”. A firearm is really nothing more nor less than a very effective “equalizer”. It makes you equal to virtually any adversary, even a whole gang. Unless their courage is propped up with an enormous amount of dope or alcohol, you can be sure that even in mass these gangs are not likely to stick their necks out after looking down the barrel of a confidently held firearm. Looking towards our dismal future of lawlessness, violence and gang-land feudalism, we recommend that (White Americans) endure the real dangers in order to ensure the safety of their families with a firearm in the home.
The Most Effective Weapon: Your Skill
In general, a rifle is designed for attack and a pistol for defense. Although less wieldy, a shotgun is also a good defense weapon and requires less skill than a handgun to use effectively. Many people advocate the so called “assault rifles” (semi-automatic rifles with large magazine capacities) for defense. We discourage buying assault rifles. They are very expensive, not anywhere near as effective as one would believe, and, legally speaking, they are far more dangerous as virtually every day new laws are being passed restricting their possession. The same can be said of the large magazine capacity semi automatic pistols and “assault shot guns”. Frankly, any simple firearm, rifle, shotgun, or handgun – even a .22 plinker is perfectly adequate for defense. What is important is not your choice of weapon, but your ability to use the weapon effectively! I’ve witnessed it myself: a simple, single-shot weapon in the hands of a skilled marksman is far more deadly than a troop of mediocre riflemen armed with the latest “assault rifles”.
Necessities: Training & Information
To become a skilled marksman, you need to fire at least 20 rounds a week form the off-hand position. Handle your firearm often, so that using it is almost second nature. Learn something about human and animal anatomy. Learn where to place your shots to effectively stop and disable any adversary – including one out of his mind on dope. Be aware of all federal, state and local firearms laws. We recommend joining the National Riffle Association. They will keep you informed of all new laws and they are working hard fighting in the federal and state legislatures, as well as in the courts, to stop the flagrant disarming of the public. The liberal anti firearms hysteria is driving the NRA more and more in our direction. We are happy to report that the November issue of the American Rifleman, the NRA’s monthly magazine which circulates in the millions, carried an excellent feature story on the Randy Weaver tragedy, noting his “White separatist” religion with no derogatory connotation. They also endorsed Kirk Lyons multimillion dollar lawsuit of the Waco survivors against the government – and they know full well where Kirk stands! Firearms owners need all the support they can get. The NRA’s information legislative, and legal service are an important asset.
Defense Against Government Attack
While we feel that the growing lawlessness, violence, and gang-culture in this country warrants the possession of a firearm for defense, we do not advocate keeping firearms to defend against the police or the government. It doesn’t matter how well armed you are, you are not likely to win. You might get one or two of them (four in the case of the Davidians), but you won’t last long. The government had an inexhaustible supply of men, ammunition, and advanced technology (the best that tax-payer money can buy). Taking on the government would be like trying to fight a charging elephant with a .22. When an elephant attacks and you only have a .22, your best recourse is to run, hide and sneak away until you are out of danger. Shooting an elephant with a .22 will only make it mad. And if it’s mad, it will be much more difficult for you to get away. As both the Weaver and Davidian tragedies graphically illustrated, shooting it out with the government just isn’t practical.
Violence & Armed Revolution
Beware of those who advocate firearms for any sort of violence or guerrilla warfare against non-Whites, liberals, or the government. First of all, there is a good chance that these individuals work for the government and are interested in sending you to prison. Even if they do not work for the government, it should be apparent that they do not know what they are talking about! We have pointed out that anyone who knows anything at all about revolution or guerilla warfare would certainly be aware that there is absolutely no support for it in this country at this time. Without public support, all violence is counterproductive. This is not theory, it is a cold, hard fact!
Be aware that mediocre strategists always seem to do just what the enemy expects or wants them to do, and the followers of mediocre strategists are doomed to defeat. The government expects you to arm yourselves and be violent. The government wants you to do this. The government would love for lots of new “Order-type” organizations to spring up and lash out in armed violence. In fact, if none come about, the government will do everything it can to create some, as can be seen by the recent government entrapment of White racialist youths in Los Angeles! The government is ready and waiting for armed violence. Don’t fall in to their trap! The greatest of military victories have been won by a disciplined force doing exactly what the enemy never expected – or never thought possible. A brilliant example of this is how the British Colonel Lawrence easily took the Turkish stronghold of Aqaba with a ragged band of Arabs. That’s solution-oriented. A final note on armed revolution: In 1923 Germany was ripe for revolution. A. Hitler had 55,000 registered supporters, professional military officers (even Generals), the active support of hundreds of armed, trained, combat veterans, and public support, the like of which we could not even imagine! On November 8, 1923, he attempted an armed revolution and failed. Think about it. If he failed in such an opportune situation, then why should we consider armed revolution in a country not ripe for it – with no public support, no trained veterans, no leader, no military officers, and no organization with more than a hundred or so registered supporters? Even though in later years Hitler’s support grew and the threat of Marxist take-over increased, he never again considered armed revolution. Instead, like his Marxist adversaries, he carefully build a solid, Folk-based movement which ultimately could not be denied power! This is our task today.
It is our duty to defend our families from an onslaught of violence and lawlessness which the government is allowing and encouraging to proliferate. But as (White Americans), we must do so intelligently and responsibly, training ourselves in the skilled use of simple weapons, while keeping abreast of the changing laws which govern their use and possession. Just as in NS Germany, the next revolution will be a revolution in thought. – Jost
Lok what happened to Wat Tyler as well. He had 10s of thousands of followers with training as proficient archers he wrung concessions out of the King, beheaded dozens of Tax collectors, bankers and courtiers ( Emmanuels, Bloombergs, Feinsteins of their day) and he still came out dead with his followers scattered. They were picked off later one by one.
The best thing to do is to provoke a policy crisis. Then people will polarize naturally and you just need to harness that crowd energy to get what you want. Forment a policy crisis over a fine or a tax and you are more than halfway to victory.
Yeah, agree with the above. Shooting at government people isn’t going to get you anywhere but dead and I would distance myself from anyone that is advocating that.
What you must do, is work on your persuasion skills. Anyone that says they aren’t willing to learn how to persuade and are not using these skills right now, is certainly not going to pick up a gun in a violent revolution anyway. They will be making the same excuses for doing nothing then, that they are making right now.
Don’t forget that the entire Soviet Union was taken down, without a single shot being fired, by dissidents working on the ground. Bob Whitaker was one of the men, that provided the talking points to those dissidents and he is on our side right now.
The Soviet Union collapsed because the Jews didn’t need it anymore. They had their Israel safe and secure by the late 1960s. The USSR unravelled very quickly after that. There was an earlier defection in the 1950s by Trotskyite intellectuals like Clement Greenberg who became pro American once his coreligionists were allowed into Harvard and Eisenhower vaguely threw some support behind the Israelis. The USSR was quite clearly Zion for Jews in the 1920-1955 period.
Once the various nationalisms of the Russian Empire returned and the Eastern Satellites reasserted their identity the Jews had sodded off to Tel Aviv and New York.
John,
You are just giving your opinion as if it is fact, and you have nothing to back it up with. You have not worked in politics, at the highest levels have you? And you have not worked for the CIA, or Voice of America, have you?
And since when have the Jews voluntarily given up ANYTHING, let alone a SUPER POWER???
John, you must be a comedian! LOL
This guy is a pro. He uses the self defense talking point.
Piers Morgan vs Larry Pratt Part 1 01/09/2013
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhQSvmcXC64
Piers Morgan vs Larry Pratt Part 2 01/09/2013
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44bWvpBZpng
Piers Morgan vs Larry Pratt Part 3 01/09/2013
I posted some links above that are in moderation. Here are the titles so you can find them on YouTube.
Piers Morgan vs Larry Pratt Part 1 01/09/2013
Piers Morgan vs Larry Pratt Part 2 01/09/2013
Piers Morgan vs Larry Pratt Part 3 01/09/2013
This guy is a professional of the same caliber as Bob Whitaker. He gets paid big money to do this. In this interview, he uses the self defense talking point and never leaves it. As you see Piers Morgan is utterly helpless.
Now imagine every Pro White or Pro Southerner, armed with these talking points and using them all over America on a daily basis. The anti-White system wouldn’t last long. This is what they did to the USSR.
there is another reason that is quite compelling to me. The USSR experienced a catastrophic birth rate drop. The population shrank. Emmanuel Todd (a French Demographer) wrote a book in the late 1970s called La Chute Final (Final Fall) that predicted the collapse of the Soviet state within 10 years. You should read that book “Anti” it was a bullseye that the CIA ignored. There were not enough Russians to sustain their military industrial complex. During the 70s. Thousands of technically educated Jews defected and moved to Israel too. A few legally educated Jews who remained became what we now describe as Oligarchs–Roman Abramovich for example. The USSR was disintegrating demographically and ecomonically during the 1960s according the the files that exist. The CIA and other intelligence groups grossly exagerated the strength of the Soviets at that time. you should read La Chute Final and think about how the USSR was presented by US media and compare the two narratives.
One side effect of the neglect of the Eastern European lands, rather happily, is that they are firmly white and happy to express nationalism.
There is wrinkle in the Arguments about guns in the UK. In Northern Ireland or Ulster firearms are very widespread and quite legal. Even automatic weapons. They have a slightly higher crime rate and gun crime rate than the mainland. Ulster is an armed camp and is more deadly and criminal than the rest of the UK.
However, Morgan is quite interested in this topic so I think he’s convertible.
Soviet Union collapsed was a demography collapse. You think the ruskies were aware of the transition? USA demography shifting without a bang.
I think they Russians were well aware of it. We are well aware of our own decline as a people, but dress it up in rhetoric about black and brown immigrants enriching us.
WW2 wasn’t the disaster. It was the cold war. The gulag state prevented the free flow of Slavs to replenish our populations. Look at Russian women! They were economically and culturally convinced to not breed like rabbits.
Please respect the OD comment guidelines and avoid going off on hobby horse tangents.
This is very well written article by Jost Turner on the best use of firearms in the United States. The article does not discuss the break up of the Soviet Union.
OD readers need to do a better job of staying focused.
An AR-15 in my hands is very effective for whatever is needed to be done. That said if you are going to defend yourself the technicalities might get you but weigh your odds. Also note that the author linked “single shot rifle” and “highly trained.”. So when you surrender your AR in a gesture of submission the die is cast that you’re not allowed to defend yourself with a gun. Doubt me then use those “easily obtained” shotguns in those glorious Euro countries. You will be crucified guns are for bunnies not “social allies” (look up that Stalinist term). Nice try Jack.
It’s loosely connected. I don’t know if the soviets attempted to disarm their people in the 20s but they certainly disarmed certain populations. The gulag archipelago also pointed out that Russians were passive with the NKVD Instead of combative. If Russians had resisted more the Cheka would not have been effective.
Ryan, we must use analogy here and compare and contrast. Wat Tyler had Richard II the King in his palm and the Peasants had won but they laid down their longbows when he commanded them to follow him. Foolish credulous and naive peasants that they were.
Ceremonially handing over a weapon is stupidity. It’s also surrender. It would be better to oil up the weapons, wrap them in leather and plastic and bury them for later retrieval.
John: “In Northern Ireland or Ulster firearms are very widespread and quite legal. Even automatic weapons. They have a slightly higher crime rate and gun crime rate than the mainland. Ulster is an armed camp and is more deadly and criminal than the rest of the UK. ”
I often wondered why there hasn’t seemed to be any gun-smuggling into England after the weapons ban. Are the English really that… whipped?
And does anyone know if the newly-seceded Scots will allow themselves arms?
“The government had an inexhaustible supply of men, ammunition, and advanced technology (the best that tax-payer money can buy). Taking on the government would be like trying to fight a charging elephant with a .22. When an elephant attacks and you only have a .22, your best recourse is to run, hide and sneak away until you are out of danger” The Regime is hell bent of destroying advarsery by whatever means. Election’s is nothing more than a dog and pony show for the dummies.
Russia and the former republics are still owned by The Crown. The Bank of Russia is not owned by a sovereign Russian people.
Russia and the BRICS are being built up as an ‘anti-Zionist’ controlled opposition for the next stage of the Communist Revolution which is Globalism.
Just as the Zionist anti-Communist West was always in cahoots with the Bolsheviks in Russia. So now the ‘anti-Zionist’ former Soviet republics are in cahoots with the Zionist and globalist West.
This is why they call the MO of their Revolution dialectical.
while being well trained is great advice his notions of what firearm is for what…. not so much
Lynda your post violates OD’s comment guidelines, which prohibit wild, unsubstantiated conspiracy theories.
We want to strongly avoid the trap of thinking and acting that everyething in the world is controlled by all powerful, sinister forces and there is nothing the regular American White person can do about such forces. It’s this type of defeatism that allowed White Americans to give up Los Angeles to racially motivated Mexicans, Birmingham Alabama to Blacks etc.
Russis now certainly not controlled or dominated by the Jews.
Russia is in the middle of finding its soul. The banishment of Pussy Riot is a very healthy sign. They protected their cathedral for once. I expect good things for them in their near future.
There will be a political flash point, a dispute over a court ordered fine or a tax that people will refuse to comply with. That will set off the trouble.
John says:
January 11, 2013 at 2:18 pm (Edit)
Russia is in the middle of finding its soul. The banishment of Pussy Riot is a very healthy sign. They protected their cathedral for once. I expect good things for them in their near future.
Jack Ryan replied:
Agreed. Putin is the best Russian leader since my relatives were running things back in the 18-19th century.
Well said Mr. Ryan in reply to that scared woman Lynda and her theories of Omnipotent Beings of the “Great Conspiracy.”
“even a .22 plinker is perfectly adequate for defense.”
“Shooting an elephant with a .22 will only make it mad.”
Theses statements are at odds with each other. Elephants kill about one person a day on average. African game wardens/guides and the Indian police of course do not use .22 rimfires for taking down rogue or pissed-off elephants. Likewise and human adversary may very well be perforated with a fatal .22 Long Rifle round and not even know he has taken a hit. He may be a dangerous and effective combatant for several long minutes before succumbing to the effects of blood loss through a small hole in his circulatory system.
The .22 rimfire rifle is best employed to harvest small game and to teach youngsters the basic use of firearms. The ammo is ultra cheap and everyone should own one.
Every white man should have a Mauser and a balcony with a view to “Go Goeth” on the nigger chaingangs after BRA falls.
Moderation and censorship… Your full of it Jack….Who the true enemy is is no conspiracy. Your right Lynda….
John,
First you were saying with authority, it was the Jews losing interest in a Super Power. Then when you were asked why the Jews would give up a Super Power of all things, suddenly you change course and start speaking with authority about Russian demographic collapse.
I also asked who are you and your sources, to speak with such authority on these matters and you gave no answer, because you have no real world experience and neither do the intellectuals you may be quoting.
So IMO this is all a smoke screen, to avoid going out and doing the hard work of Persuading people to join our cause.
And if you guys think an AR-15 puts you on equal ground with the largest, most technologically advanced military in the world, that has a budget larger than all the world’s militaries combined, you and anyone following you, live in la, la land.
The only way you will be on equal footing with the US Military, is to convince half of them to defect to your side and take the advanced hardware and supply chain with them. This will not be achieved sitting in your log cabins, waiting for the Government to come take your AR-15 cache.
No event is monocausal. That’s just me being emPhatic in one post, possibly to the exclusion of other causes. Do you seriously disagree that the Communist October revolution was anything BUT a Jewish takeover of the Russian Empire? Seriously you’d bother to dispute this? Lol.
You also said I used no authority in the first post. The USSR was a lot of smoke and mirrors. Once Israel was made safe after the Victory of the Six Days War it is noticable that “dissident” Jews we’re bailing out in large quanities. Israel itself also stopped supporting its own Labour Party at this time. Nationalism reasserted itself once the neglect set in.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_immigration_to_Israel_in_the_1990s
1,000,000 Jews left the former territory of the USSR during the 1990s and voted with their feet by entering Israel.
About 200,000 Jews bailed out of the USSR in the 1970s and entered Israel. This is the only national population in the USSR to get out in such numbers and at a high proportional rate. During the 1980s the outflow of Jews doubled. By the 1990s there were 1,000,000 émigrés. Can you connect the dots there? Or are you thick?
Stalin was the first head of State to recognize Israel.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel–Russia_relations
Remarkably the third language in Israel is Russian (Jews on the run eh)
The outflow from Russia was especially accellerated after the Six Days War triumph which was a signal to Jewery in Russia that it was safe to resettle.
@John
1 million Jews controlled all of the USSR? By how much were they outnumbered? 100 to 1? So essentially, you are saying they are Super Human and can’t be beat.
Do you think the CIA did not understand the Super Human Jew theory better than you guys do?
If the CIA understood it, why was so much US money spent challenging the USSR, when the Jews inside the USSR, were already doing a controlled demolition – so they could go live on a tiny sliver of land in the desert, surrounded by 1 billion hostile Muslims? Doesn’t sound like a clever plan to me.
Reagan – Tear Down This Wall
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjWDrTXMgF8
The Berlin Wall Falls 1989 NBC Coverage Pt1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fK1MwhEDjHg
Why did Reagan focus on the Berlin Wall? Why did he call them the Evil Empire? Why did he invent the Star Wars program?
Pretty risky and unnecessary game of nuclear brinkmanship, considering the Jews were already demolishing the place, as you claim.
Or are you saying the Jews can hide things as large as a demolition of a Super Power from the CIA as well? 🙂
@John
1 million Jews controlled all of the USSR? By how much were they outnumbered? 100 to 1? So essentially, you are saying they are Super Human and can’t be beat.
Do you think the CIA did not understand the Super Human Jew theory better than you guys do?
If the CIA understood it, why was so much US money spent challenging the USSR, when the Jews inside the USSR, were already doing a controlled demolition – so they could go live on a tiny sliver of land in the desert, surrounded by 1 billion hostile Muslims? Doesn’t sound like a clever plan to me.
Youtube
Reagan – Tear Down This Wall
Youtube
The Berlin Wall Falls 1989 NBC Coverage Pt1
Why did Reagan focus on the Berlin Wall? Why did he call them the Evil Empire? Why did he invent the Star Wars program?
Pretty risky and unnecessary game of nuclear brinkmanship, considering the Jews were already demolishing the place, as you claim.
Or are you saying the Jews can hide things as large as a demolition of a Super Power from the CIA as well? 🙂
John
As for your claim that 1 million Jews left… Well, no one is allowed to leave Communist countries and that is why they suck.
They build those walls not to keep people out, but to keep their own people from Leaving. At the same time they tell those same people, they are living in a Workers Paradise.
That is a huge contradiction and a weakness and that is what the CIA focused on.
This may surprise you, but Communist defectors out of Russia in the 1970s were saying, 85% of the KGB budget went into writing and publishing articles, attacking the systems of governments, they wanted to bring down.
What James Bond does in the movies is only a small part of what they do. I know its not very exciting, but that is what intelligence agencies do, in the real world.
Do you seriously disagree that the Communist October revolution was anything BUT a Jewish takeover of the Russian Empire? Seriously you’d bother to dispute this? Lol.
John, you have a much better grasp of history than you would lead others to believe by this quote.
The outcome: Jewish hegemony (brief & turbulent btw) was not the goal of the Bolshevik Jews, not even the Bundists.
John says:
“Do you seriously disagree that the Communist October revolution was anything BUT a Jewish takeover of the Russian Empire? Seriously you’d bother to dispute this? Lol.”
Do we agree that Jews go out and do activism in the real world? Do we agree they Persuade White people to do their bidding?
Do we agree that failed “Intellectuals” invent conspiracy theories about Super Human Jews, to divert attention from their own incompetence, when it comes to practical politics?
What if instead of spreading demoralizing theories on Super Human Jews, we actually got on with the business of taking power?
Gee I don’t know, that sounds like hard work…
Don’t put words in my mouth.
Golda Meir, directly after the 6 Days war, and in the 1970s, called for the Jews to leave the USSR. This opened up a comparative floodgate of emigration to Israel.
The USSR was essentially formed in a coup de main in St Petersburg. A disproportionate number of the coup enactors were Jewish. And yes a small well organized minority can seize power and rule by terror. How many Russians were even sincere Bolsheviks in 1917? They couldn’t have amounted to more than a couple of thousand true believers. You should look into the decay of the Soviet a union in the 1970s it was quite real. Demographically, technologically it was a zombie state.
And fuck your James Bond non sequitur.
The USSR was quite clearly Zion for Jews in the 1920-1955 period.
Calling Lenin and Stalin’s Soviet Union “Zion”. Is that what they taught you at Oxford? Because there was no explicit antisemitism and a handful if Jews were tolerated. I call that Zion the same dogshit sprinkled with some chocolate chips is a brownie.
Where did I say there was a superhuman conspiracy? There were periods where Stalin wiped out his Jewish henchmen too.
Btw, your hagiography of Reagan is a fugging joke.
A disproportionate number of the coup enactors were Jewish
The majority of Slavs signed “X” on a contract in the early 20th. Georgians, Jews, Armenians were all overrepresented because they were much more literate and spoke at least two languages unlike the serf herd.
You’re better than this, John.
I didn’t go to Oxford. I’m from Oxford.
Bolshevism was a crash course for Russians to get them up to snuff. A bloody tragically atheist accelerated special ed course in modernization that they needed to fulfill their aspirations of being able to run a modern country for themselves without help from their betters.
ohn says:
January 12, 2013 at 4:49 am
“Where did I say there was a superhuman conspiracy?”
You claim 1 million Jews controlled a world super power and demolished it, all without the knowledge of the CIA. Sounds Super Human to me. Sounds God like in fact.
“Btw, your hagiography of Reagan is a fugging joke.”
In your opinion… as always.
It comes from the people that worked for him and put talking points in his mouth. The people that made that particular piece of history.
John’s assert
“1 million Jews controlled a world super power and demolished it, all without the knowledge of the CIA. Sounds Super Human to me. Sounds God like in fact.”
Actually no… It sounds SILLY. Don’t you agree it is SILLY?
The plurality of the world’s Jewish population was contained within the Russian Empire in 1917. They did extraordinarily well out of the October Revolution. Essentially, it was the day of their emancipation. They lost interest in the place after the Israelis showed that they could beat back the Arabs. Reemerging Russian nationalism was also a making it a less pleasant place to live. The Jews rather mysteriously were allowed to leave in enormous numbers in a way that no Slav was eve allowed to migrate.
Yeah the refuseniks can tell you what it was like to be fast-tracked for emigration.
Why are you putting quotes around something I didn’t say? Making it look like I said 1,000,000 Jews controlled the USSR? I didnt say they controlled the USSR I said that they migrated out 1,000,000 strong in the 1990s.
Do you agree they Persuaded Whites to join them in their revolution using Activism, or are you claiming they chained the entire Soviet Union up?
“They lost interest in the place after the Israelis showed that they could beat back the Arabs. ”
No one was allowed to leave the Soviet Union. They shot people that tried to escape. Are you really saying you are not aware of this???
They still behave like this in North Korea. Everyone knows this.
Most Jews are filth, no doubt. But hating a Jew for his Jewishness is silly. Most Jews have a “greek soul” which means they can be dealt with honorably as individuals. Liberal, Commie, antiracist, antiwhite, christ blasphemer Jews? Gas them, drown them, behead them. The good Jews wouldn’t lift a finger if we’re sophisticated enough to differentiate.
In the 1960s 4,000 or so left.
Then once the Israelis proved their ability to defense themselves…
In the 1970s 250,000 migrated.
In the 1980s Gorbachev allowed the remaining Refusniks to leave. This suggests that the Jews in the USSR had lost interest in the USSR and were disengaging themselves from involvement in that state that had Hitherto been quite enthusiastic. The Revolution itself had been seen as emancipatory for Jews in the Russian Empire, after Israel was founded this perception eroded among Jews in the USSR as they now had the actual Zion, instead of Ersatz Zion.
Tamer, you are steeped in mythology.