The following essay was written by Jost Turner, an American Viet Nam veteran, who founded a White folk community – NS Kindred in the Mountains of Northern California. Jost worked briefly in the open American White Nationalist “movement” but he became very disillusioned with the selfish, dysfunctional people in “The Movement”. Jost sought to discover and live authentic, Indo-European religions as practices by Indo-Europeans in India, Persia, Greek areas of modern Turkey and Europe during the last golden age. This article has been edited, recognizing the American negative bias associated with anything related to German National Socialism. – Jack Ryan
Firearms: The Great Equalizer by Jost
Clearly, violations of the laws regarding possession and use of firearms have been responsible for sending more White racialists to prison than anything else. There are probably thousands of different firearms laws in this country, all varying from state to state, county to county and city to city. Most of these laws are blatantly ill-written, but enforced with the fervor of an inquisition. Petty firearms violations were used as the government’s justification to attack both Randy Weaver and the Waco Davidians. Without a doubt, possession of firearms is the greatest danger to White racialists in general, and to Folk-communities in particular.
Nevertheless, we strongly encourage all (White Americans), especially our women and even our children, to be armed and highly skilled in the use of firearms. This is because the country is being invaded by hordes of criminals and gangs from Non-White countries notorious for violence and savagery. Neither the government nor the police are making any real effort to protect the public from these lowly evolved creatures, and so it is quite likely that we all will have to deal with them ourselves sooner or later.
Being armed is very effective against criminals and gangs. This was dramatically proven during the Los Angeles Rodney King riots. Invariably, the mere presence of a firearm was enough to send the rampaging gangs in the opposite direction – actually firing the weapon was unnecessary. This is because criminals ang gang members are by nature extremely selfish, indulgent and really quite cowardly. Hence, they prey only on the weak. However, they do not look on a man or woman with a firearm as “weak prey”. A firearm is really nothing more nor less than a very effective “equalizer”. It makes you equal to virtually any adversary, even a whole gang. Unless their courage is propped up with an enormous amount of dope or alcohol, you can be sure that even in mass these gangs are not likely to stick their necks out after looking down the barrel of a confidently held firearm. Looking towards our dismal future of lawlessness, violence and gang-land feudalism, we recommend that (White Americans) endure the real dangers in order to ensure the safety of their families with a firearm in the home.
The Most Effective Weapon: Your Skill
In general, a rifle is designed for attack and a pistol for defense. Although less wieldy, a shotgun is also a good defense weapon and requires less skill than a handgun to use effectively. Many people advocate the so called “assault rifles” (semi-automatic rifles with large magazine capacities) for defense. We discourage buying assault rifles. They are very expensive, not anywhere near as effective as one would believe, and, legally speaking, they are far more dangerous as virtually every day new laws are being passed restricting their possession. The same can be said of the large magazine capacity semi automatic pistols and “assault shot guns”. Frankly, any simple firearm, rifle, shotgun, or handgun – even a .22 plinker is perfectly adequate for defense. What is important is not your choice of weapon, but your ability to use the weapon effectively! I’ve witnessed it myself: a simple, single-shot weapon in the hands of a skilled marksman is far more deadly than a troop of mediocre riflemen armed with the latest “assault rifles”.
Necessities: Training & Information
To become a skilled marksman, you need to fire at least 20 rounds a week form the off-hand position. Handle your firearm often, so that using it is almost second nature. Learn something about human and animal anatomy. Learn where to place your shots to effectively stop and disable any adversary – including one out of his mind on dope. Be aware of all federal, state and local firearms laws. We recommend joining the National Riffle Association. They will keep you informed of all new laws and they are working hard fighting in the federal and state legislatures, as well as in the courts, to stop the flagrant disarming of the public. The liberal anti firearms hysteria is driving the NRA more and more in our direction. We are happy to report that the November issue of the American Rifleman, the NRA’s monthly magazine which circulates in the millions, carried an excellent feature story on the Randy Weaver tragedy, noting his “White separatist” religion with no derogatory connotation. They also endorsed Kirk Lyons multimillion dollar lawsuit of the Waco survivors against the government – and they know full well where Kirk stands! Firearms owners need all the support they can get. The NRA’s information legislative, and legal service are an important asset.
Defense Against Government Attack
While we feel that the growing lawlessness, violence, and gang-culture in this country warrants the possession of a firearm for defense, we do not advocate keeping firearms to defend against the police or the government. It doesn’t matter how well armed you are, you are not likely to win. You might get one or two of them (four in the case of the Davidians), but you won’t last long. The government had an inexhaustible supply of men, ammunition, and advanced technology (the best that tax-payer money can buy). Taking on the government would be like trying to fight a charging elephant with a .22. When an elephant attacks and you only have a .22, your best recourse is to run, hide and sneak away until you are out of danger. Shooting an elephant with a .22 will only make it mad. And if it’s mad, it will be much more difficult for you to get away. As both the Weaver and Davidian tragedies graphically illustrated, shooting it out with the government just isn’t practical.
Violence & Armed Revolution
Beware of those who advocate firearms for any sort of violence or guerrilla warfare against non-Whites, liberals, or the government. First of all, there is a good chance that these individuals work for the government and are interested in sending you to prison. Even if they do not work for the government, it should be apparent that they do not know what they are talking about! We have pointed out that anyone who knows anything at all about revolution or guerilla warfare would certainly be aware that there is absolutely no support for it in this country at this time. Without public support, all violence is counterproductive. This is not theory, it is a cold, hard fact!
Be aware that mediocre strategists always seem to do just what the enemy expects or wants them to do, and the followers of mediocre strategists are doomed to defeat. The government expects you to arm yourselves and be violent. The government wants you to do this. The government would love for lots of new “Order-type” organizations to spring up and lash out in armed violence. In fact, if none come about, the government will do everything it can to create some, as can be seen by the recent government entrapment of White racialist youths in Los Angeles! The government is ready and waiting for armed violence. Don’t fall in to their trap! The greatest of military victories have been won by a disciplined force doing exactly what the enemy never expected – or never thought possible. A brilliant example of this is how the British Colonel Lawrence easily took the Turkish stronghold of Aqaba with a ragged band of Arabs. That’s solution-oriented. A final note on armed revolution: In 1923 Germany was ripe for revolution. A. Hitler had 55,000 registered supporters, professional military officers (even Generals), the active support of hundreds of armed, trained, combat veterans, and public support, the like of which we could not even imagine! On November 8, 1923, he attempted an armed revolution and failed. Think about it. If he failed in such an opportune situation, then why should we consider armed revolution in a country not ripe for it – with no public support, no trained veterans, no leader, no military officers, and no organization with more than a hundred or so registered supporters? Even though in later years Hitler’s support grew and the threat of Marxist take-over increased, he never again considered armed revolution. Instead, like his Marxist adversaries, he carefully build a solid, Folk-based movement which ultimately could not be denied power! This is our task today.
It is our duty to defend our families from an onslaught of violence and lawlessness which the government is allowing and encouraging to proliferate. But as (White Americans), we must do so intelligently and responsibly, training ourselves in the skilled use of simple weapons, while keeping abreast of the changing laws which govern their use and possession. Just as in NS Germany, the next revolution will be a revolution in thought. – Jost
Exact quote from John:
“The Soviet Union collapsed because the Jews didn’t need it anymore. They had their Israel safe and secure by the late 1960s. The USSR unravelled very quickly after that.”
These are your assertions so far:
Jews controlled the entire USSR AND demolished it when they lost interest in it.
Reagan and the CIA’s Activism inside the USSR, had nothing to do with taking the USSR down, because the Super Human Jews were doing it all for them all without their knowledge.
Which parts are you backing away from?
Same applies to Yankees.
John says:
“Why are you putting quotes around something I didn’t say? Making it look like I said 1,000,000 Jews controlled the USSR? I didnt say they controlled the USSR I said that they migrated out 1,000,000 strong in the 1990s.”
Exact quote from John:
“The Soviet Union collapsed because the Jews didn’t need it anymore. They had their Israel safe and secure by the late 1960s. The USSR unravelled very quickly after that.”
These are your assertions so far:
1) Jews controlled the entire USSR AND demolished it when they lost interest in it.
2) Reagan and the CIA’s Activism inside the USSR, had nothing to do with taking the USSR down, because the Super Human Jews were doing it all for them all without the knowledge of the CIA.
Which parts are you backing away from?
They shot Germans and Czechs and Hungarians who attempted to escape. The story with the migration to Israel was a great deal different.
What’s your point at 5:13?
The demonstrated success of the Jewish state led to an increase in emigration from around the world, including Russia. Sounds reasonable. Not everyone gets a new passport at the drop of a hat, John.
So the Jews made Putin and his fellow KGB agents shoot Germans? Or is Putin a secret Jew? Or perhaps they used their super human powers to hypnotize him?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Putin
Putin joined the KGB in 1975 upon graduation, and underwent a year’s training at the 401st KGB school in Okhta, Leningrad. He then went on to work briefly in the Second Chief Directorate (counter-intelligence) before he was transferred to the First Chief Directorate, where among his duties was the monitoring of foreigners and consular officials in Leningrad.[35][36]
From 1985 to 1990, the KGB stationed Putin in Dresden, East Germany.[37] Following the collapse of the East German government, Putin was recalled to the Soviet Union and returned to Leningrad, where in June 1991 he assumed a position with the International Affairs section of Leningrad State University, reporting to Vice-Rector Yuriy Molchanov.[36] In his new position, Putin maintained surveillance on the student body and kept an eye out for recruits. It was during his stint at the university that Putin grew reacquainted with his former professor Anatoly Sobchak, then mayor of Leningrad.[38]
Tamer of Savages says:
January 12, 2013 at 5:19 am
“What’s your point at 5:13?”
Ask John. It is what he is asserting and it makes no sense to me either.
No, those are not my assertions. You are also over playing the first statement I made. put in a qualifier … One of the reasons the USSR collapsed was that Jews …
The role of the US (specifially Reagan’s role) in the unravelling of the USSR is vastly overstated. The suppression of the various nationalities in the Warsaw Pact could go on indefintly, nor could it continue much longer in the USSR proper. Certainly not with the dwindling birthrate of Russia.
The USSR was facing a demographic crisis as far back as the 1970s as birthrates collapsed. It was also facing an exodus of may of the core fanatics that were required to keep it afloat by that time.
They shot Germans and Czechs and Hungarians who attempted to escape. The story with the migration to Israel was a great deal different.
Those communist countries would have shot Jewish runaways if the Germans hadn’t done so first.
I understand that you dislike Russians Anti, that’s okay, you are a Cold Warrior. That’s cool. You probably had assets who were Jews too while you worked a field office. They were probably your best agents. But, that rather proves the point too doesn’t it?
If there was a Christian European settler-state sounding the trumpet and had tickets for twenty-something Anglo guys like me do you think I’d continue splitting my time between NYC and rural Jersey? If you do, you’re a fool. And if you’d begrudge a Jew for having the luxury of that choice and making the same decision I would, you’re a bastard.
The Palestinians were the ones who shot Russian-Jews. I recall that a camp of them was shot up in Austria in 1973 by the PLO.
It was your quote John.
” It was also facing an exodus of may of the core fanatics that were required to keep it afloat by that time.”
That is nonsense John. No one was allowed to leave the USSR. Everyone knows that.
They were building secret tunnels under the walls, trying to escape to the West. It was the main hot button issue in the 1980s.
So why were White KGB agents like Putin, shooting everyone except for Jews?
I don’t blame them. good for them for getting to Israel. It’s where they belong. Jewish people in Israel? it’s a good thing.
John says:
January 12, 2013 at 5:28 am
“I understand that you dislike Russians Anti, that’s okay, you are a Cold Warrior. That’s cool. You probably had assets who were Jews too while you worked a field office. They were probably your best agents. But, that rather proves the point too doesn’t it?”
You are putting words in my mouth, because you have made a complete fool of yourself here.
All because you want to make the argument that Activism does not work, because Jews are Super Human.
Sounds to me like you are trying to demoralize Pro Whites into inaction.
I just showed you the data that shows Jewish migration from Israel. are you thick? do you think I pulled that number out of a hat? Yeah they were gunning down captive European populations. East Germany was a vast gulag for example. For some reason, you’d have to ask the guy who wrote Gulag Archipeligo, Soldyertitzin or summat why certain groups were treated more respectfully. This is the problem with vast Multicultural Equalitarian States. Certain groups get a slightly easier ride.
They were probably your best agents. But, that rather proves the point too doesn’t it?
The course BRA is on will prove it unable to keepup the already awkward “special relationship” if for no othe reason than the impossibility of Britain despite itself to catchup with our cultural decline. You’d tell Mi6 to put their schmeckle in their goy-hole if you had dirt on BRA?
All because you want to make the argument that Activism does not work, because Jews are Super Human.
When did I say that? Arguably Russian women were voting with their wombs by not reproducing. Which is activism of a sort. Why have kids who are tax slaves to the state? They appeared to be saying.
I would hand them anything and I have active BRA spooks in family and an ex-gf spook.
Isn’t Orwell’s “All animals are Equal, but some animals are more equal that others” enough of an explanation for what happens to favoured ethnic groups?
John
“I just showed you the data that shows Jewish migration from Israel.”
And all of East Germany left as well, as all of its satellite states. lol
Everyone was free to leave in the 1990s, because the Communist system had been destroyed by Reagan and the CIA.
The USSR was never a nice place to live. Communism doesn’t work anywhere so people naturally want to leave.
” are you thick? ”
You should ask that question about yourself, if you really believe what you have been asserting here.
“When did I say that?”
Must I quote you back again, when you keep saying what the CIA did there was over stated? Do you have a memory problem?
Allow me to say I have tremendous respect for John. The matter is that I’m a pr-Enlightenment antisemite where my objections are cultural and religious. John is an enlightened antisemite that focuses on things like “jewish race” and disloyalty to propositional nations.
I don’t think expecting loyalty to some piece of paper and a “revolution” trumps ethnicity or culture, ever nor should it.
Actually I didn’t put words in your mouth. I’ve not asked you any leading questions, or loaded questions. I’m not a journalist interviewing you to sting you later on. I don’t care what you think in any profound way. I showed with same data that Jews were not on board he USSR project after Israel was founded, and that they bailed once Israel was secure in 1967. In the 1920s and much of the 1930s they were fanatical commies bacause it duties their immediate needs.
I merely guessed a few things about you and your work from what you said. did it hit a nerve?
No John,
You have hit no nerves, just made a complete fool of yourself.
Tamer of Savages says:
January 12, 2013 at 5:50 am
“Allow me to say I have tremendous respect for John. The matter is that I’m a pr-Enlightenment antisemite where my objections are cultural and religious. John is an enlightened antisemite that focuses on things like “jewish race” and disloyalty to propositional nations.”
I have no respect for his thought processes now, as I can see they are irrational. Worse, when this irrationality is pointed out, instead of taking responsibility like a man, he says, “Oh you must hate Russians.”
250,000 Migrated in the 1970s. that’s a huge number as far as Israel was concerned in that time period.
Tamer, why should the Jewish population have showed any favour to the USSR after Israel was founded? I can’t think of any compelling reason. Marxism was essentially a messianic millenialist fever dream of a German Jew, realized by an emancipated cadre of fanatics in the old Russian Empire. Once they got their soil back the fanatical devotion to communism drained away. Communist Jews in the US like the Rosenbergs were a bit slow to catch on. Clement Greenburg converted from communism to democratic liberalism and promoted American art and Israel in one go.
On Putin. He’s a feudal baron. While he was a KGB officer he kept the slaves on the estate by any means.
You just can’t believe that many Whites love the idea of Communism as well.
Almost half of Whites still love Communism in the USA and vote Democrat in the USA, which is a creeping form of Communism.
Yet no… We can’t take Responsibility for the behavior of our fellow Whites and our failure to use effective activism.
The Jews make us do it, is just an evasion of responsibility.
You think I’m denigrating whatever work you did to get rid of the USSR. I only said that Reagan’s role was over played.
If you want to get into the Cold War in wider way let’s look at the propaganda campaign of civil rights. The treatment of blacks in the South was used by the Soviets to show that the US was racist in order to pursuade African states to align with them. Eisenhower mentioned the Cold War in coming to his decision to desegregate and enforce integration. American Civil Rights legislation was a very active topic in the Cold War.
How rational was Eisenhower? what long term purpose was served in trying to outdo the USSR on the subject of equality?
Anti-Whites, I still respect John because every point he makes at 6:07 is true.
White American Christians were loyal to the USA so long as it represented our interests if no longer in word then at least more or less deed until the 1960’s. Now to borrow John’s term it’s a “zombie state” championed by atavistic lowlives that worship power and a few true believers that think it can yet still become more perfect, just like the soviet union under Brezhnev.
No, I can readily see that 40% of American whites are in favour of some sort of lefty leftist socialist Communist state. Thats actually a fairly normal distribution of political thought among whites though. I’m not opposed to some sort of democratically ekevted socialist state if the state is ethnically or racially homogenous. Sweden was an example of this in the 1980s.
The problem in the US is that blacks constitute a bloc that votes 90/100% one way and creates uninhabitable cities and the leech off your taxes to feed their kids. The left Right Split is child’s play by comparison.
What
John says:
January 12, 2013 at 6:16 am
“You think I’m denigrating whatever work you did to get rid of the USSR. I only said that Reagan’s role was over played. ”
I am not Ole Bob. You really think he would be here arguing with you? He has hundreds of people out there, doing this kind of thing.
I am relating what he has said about those days and what famous KGB defectors have said. You can find this stuff on Youtube.
I was just a teenager when they took the USSR down, but I remember those days fairly well. The “Experts” assured us nightly, the USSR was powerful, was something to fear and would last forever, or until we all ended in Armageddon. And we were all scared.
Meanwhile the CIA knew they were weak and got on with the job of taking them down.
Here’s another example of a weak country that has not fallen:
North Korea:
They have famines, they rule with an iron fist. No one is allowed to leave.
The average income is 100 US dollars a year.
The ruling class live at Western standards, while everyone else starves and are not paid for their work.
That system sounds like hell for the majority, and should have collapsed years ago, but it has not. Why not? There is no Ronald Reagan.
How rational was Eisenhower? what long term purpose was served in trying to outdo the USSR on the subject of equality?
Throwing more scraps to the nigs in the 60’s only emboldened them, that’s when the riots started. The big buyout came in the late 60’s and early 70’s. That could be viewed as protection money to the real violent negroes and the co-opting or “non-profit organizationing” of activist scum like Jackson /Sharpton. What they needed was a bullet what they got was a Lincoln and a color tv.
What was it that Romney said? Russia is our number one geostrategic rival!
I think he actually meant it. For me it was the only real false note in his campaign. To some extent Anti, you sound like Romney right here. Wtf was Romney talking about? It’s understandable that you’d be suspicious of Russians, given what you’ve seen them do, but the last decade of the USSR can now be correctly viewed as a proposition nation circling the drain, long after the plug had been pulled.
Regardless of teutonic bureaucratic inclinations, it’s not worth sifting through a commie’s family tree for the fool’s gold of Jew blood. Shoot him in the face. And forget about him.
Russia is our number one geostrategic rival!
Russia is clearly a rival to BRA. Romney was right, doesn’t mean we are the goodguys.
North Korea is an East Asian Chinese sponsored buffer state. Reagan could have worked his magic on them too, but he didn’t. North Korea is propped up by Chinese cash. Reagan was president in the 1980s and could have worked his magic on that one, but he had no magic really. The USSR was a fundamentally bizarre occurrence by comparison.
I wasn’t affraid at the time. They were never going to invade West Germany and were looking for a way out from the cul de sac. They had driven into.
One last thing.
The Cold War victory was illusory. The white American was tricked into giving away his patrimony and is now in a situation where he’s forced into partition in his own homeland. A solution will require enormous struggles or extinction.
Alex Linder, an infirm man talks about killing every Jew, of course people are disgusted by that and he’s a known lunatic.
Commies?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygfAsEZkKA0
That’s a video of five Maoists shot dead by the Klan. All walked by an all-white jury. At the “memorial service” not even the fellow maoists could shed a tear. Commies are the main threat to civilization, they have cheapened the blood of man but theirs is always cheapest. Expose the cryptocommies (democrats) into self-criticism or admission. Do what our folk approve of when it comes to the red flag wavers.
“I wasn’t affraid at the time. They were never going to invade West Germany and were looking for a way out from the cul de sac. They had driven into.”
They had at least one close call in the 1980s and would have launched their ICBMs, except for one Russian officer refusing to push the button.
“North Korea is an East Asian Chinese sponsored buffer state. ”
Russian cash kept them alive until the fall of the Soviet Union and they have had famines where people starved to death since then.
The last video I saw coming from inside that country, made the place look very grim. Starved people at the bottom, fat people at the top. Very few cars, no technology on the farms, everything done by hand by half starved people.
And you better believe Whites in the West want Communism and they already have it in most countries.
1) The liberals I talk to, want other people to pay for their special interests, just like the leaders in North Korea do.
2) They approve and enforce Political Correctness, which can get you thrown in jail in Europe, and you are likely to lose your livelihood in most White countries. Break PC in a Communist country and there are punishments.
3) And do you remember the massive anti-War protests over Vietnam? Where have all those anti-war protestors gone since? Vietnam was a big deal, because we were fighting Communism. We haven’t fought it in a hot war since, so the “anti-War” movement is nothing compared to what is was.
What we have in the West is Second Generation Communism. It is already here.
I take a similar pov to Kevin MacDonald. It’s a good idea to know what a group is doing as a group strategy. As long as you are aware of the broad outline of the group
and their strategy it’s enough to protect yourself and discuss your observations with
Sympathetic audiences. The Mantra is a good tool when you face a neutral audience or a hostile one.
It’s hyperbole to suggest I’m claiming the Jews are supermen and that
Being proactive is pointless. I’m just pointing out their complex and crucial role in the USSR and how the foundation of Israel altered their attachment to the
Soviet proposition.
Never underestimate the power of effective Activism. They can transform entire countries with it, or demoralize the population until everything falls apart.
While we were off fighting Communism, they remained at home, Persuading people using effective Activism.
Reagan understood this.
At this point you are becoming a boor. No more please.
“It’s hyperbole to suggest I’m claiming the Jews are supermen and that
Being proactive is pointless. I’m just pointing out their complex and crucial role in the USSR and how the foundation of Israel altered their attachment to the
Soviet proposition.”
I am pointing out, we can do exactly the same as them. There are more of us. All we have to do, is get practical. Do what works and take power.
Reagan amnestied millions of browns. He’s large responsible for the Mexican migration to the US. You lose Anti, there’s Reagan’s present to you and your offspring. Paco and Primo.
John says:
January 12, 2013 at 7:14 am
“No more please.”
That’s what the anti-Whites say to us. They beg and they moan. But we don’t let up. 🙂
Starving Niggers and Yellows? What is the problem here?
John says:
January 12, 2013 at 7:17 am
“Reagan amnestied millions of browns. He’s large responsible for the Mexican migration to the US. You lose Anti, there’s Reagan’s present to you and your offspring. Paco and Primo.”
Reagan did nothing for White people. Conservatives are anti-White.
But what the CIA did to the Communists worked and we should use it.
You are saying because your enemy did something that works, we should not use it. Dumb argument.
What do you care about North Koreans for? honestly, look at your own backyard. Btw it is 1:18 locally.
However, I’d like my enemies to utterly mismanage resources and starve. A good dose of bolshie oppression probably set back China 20 years. The wars in Ethiopia and Sudan, pile the dead up, just don’t accept refugees.