Most OD readers are aware that Rand Paul was given full access to the MSM – Mainstream Media to give one of only two officially sanctioned responses to President Obama’s State of the Union Address. RINO Cuban American Marco Rubio was given the other response – the idea being that the American (White) public has only 2 possible alternatives to Obama
“Which would you rather have – Obama’s BRA/Lib Min dictatorship or….
Time Magazine’s anointed only hope for the GOP – Hispanic Sen Marco Rubio!
Also, there’s this Libertarian thing floating around out there – Rand Paul”
OD readers should be angry though not all together shocked to learn that Rand Paul has done a 180% flip flop on immigration announcing his support for open borders immigration.
Rand Paul stated:
“We … must be the party that embraces the immigrant who wants to come to America for a better future,“ Paul said. “We must be the party who sees immigrants as assets, not liabilities. We must be the party that says, ‘If you want to work, if you want to become an American, we welcome you.’”
(See Vdare’s brutal exposes of Rand Paul’s immigration betrayal)
So basically, Rand Paul is arguing that any man, woman, transgender person on planet earth who wants to come to the United Sates desiring a better life, should be welcomed, embraced – ie
the USA/GOP should welcome the whole countries of Haiti, Pakistan, Somalia!
OD has published some solid articles documenting the racial betrayals of Ron Paul and the terrible problems associated with the Libertarian cult.
Rand Paul, like his father Ron Paul – is a Libertarian true believer and also a racial pussyfooter. Neither hates White Americans, nor wants to see the genocide of White Americans. They honestly believe that their Libertarian free market economic theories can help everyone, help improve the entire world and they have lots of arguments supporting the American Constitution to supposedly protect the rights and property of (White) Americans from the horrors of the third world, the same third world they are inviting here.
With racial pussyfooters, they tend to agree with whoever happens to be in the room with them at the time. When running in campaigns with virtually all White GOP voters, they talk about lowering taxes, respecting gun rights, promoting sound monetary policies – sounds good to regular White folks. With a regular White crowd, you won’t see Ron Paul or Rand Paul espousing messianic immigration nonsense that the US most welcome the entire Third World, that we have to accept any diseased Black, Muslim terrorist that wants to try to make a better life here in the US. But, when given a lib crowd, or making some pitch on the cursed MSM – mainstream media – yeah, Rand Paul and Ron Paul will pander, pander big time. Then there’s always the pressure to fall back in to Libertarian true believer orthodoxy on open borders immigration. OD readers know the score with Libertarians and immigration.
Ron Paul was the victim a vicious ad hominem attack in 2008 by the New Republic Magazine. The publisher Marty Peretz is a homosexual Jewish man, strong Liberal Democrat and also an extreme Jewish supporter of Israel. Marty Peretz and the New Republic attacked Ron Paul for being, yes….
A RACIST!
The New Republic published articles from Ron Paul’s newsletter in the 1980s stating that Black Americans were more prone to violent crime than others and the Israeli lobby had too much influence over American foreign policy.
Instead of defending these articles as perfectly legitimate, Ron Paul proceeded to deny that he wrote or even read these TERRIBLE RACIST comments. Then Ron Paul proceded to express his great love for MLK, Rosa Parks and BRA as the expression of true “Libertarian” principles – yeah right, Ron.
So OD readers shouldn’t be too surprised that Rand Paul is pushing immigration treason, betraying our people in order to get access to the MSM – mainstream Media, be positioned for some future Libertarian Presidential Campaign that is sure always lose. The MSM, BRA like to support White political campaigns that lose and that pander to them.
So here’s a suggestion to the Rand Paul, Ron Paul true believers to help with the problem of Rand and Ron being called “RACISTS”.
Have Rand Paul and Ron Paul volunteer to become homosexual punks for HIV + Black convicts in Chicago’s Cook Country Jail. How can anyone say that Rand Paul or Ron Paul are “RACIST” or “homophobic” when they are agreeing to have homosexual intercourse with AIDS infected Black criminals? If that doesn’t forever end the charge of RACISM against Rand and Ron Paul, probably nothing will…
OK, so nothing will ever end the charge of RACISM against all remaining White people on planet earth.
In the meantime, please call, e-mail, fax the Rand Paul national office and express your strong opposition to Rand Paul’s insane, treasonous immigration comments – I did – felt good.
Here’s the phone # for Rand Paul’s Washington office:
202-224-4343
I regret every saying anything positive about the man. His response to the State of the Union address was worse than awful.
But Jack, what Presidential candidate expressed support for nullification and right to secede, auditing the Fed and ending the pro-Zionist wars, and has frequently taken the side of the seceded states against Lincoln’s treason, etc.? The “pussyfooting” or laissez faire believing behaviour on the invasion (immigration) issue is a serious fault, but no one here has ever made Ron Paul out to be a closet WN — but we know he is better than the likes of Romney!
I was never a fan of the very ambitious Rand Paul, however.
The second generation of Pauls amplifies the faults of the first, while retaining little original virtue.
Remember that the unique Ron Paul strictly constitutionalist position on states rights is much more important than his libertarian philosophy.
Jack,
I owe you an apology. I think I remember criticizing your views on Ron Paul.
You were right all along. Just another lying grifter, and his son is obviously one too. The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.
I still stand by my consistent position, at least until someone would present evidence to the contrary.
Apologies accepted. And I never get real bent out of shape about people saying negative things about me.
I was after all a 7th grade public school teacher in Red Hook Brooklyn. My students said mean things to me. I also broke with Conservative inc. Lib Libertarians over the immigration issue – got called a lot of names. That’s life.
Now, please pass the word that we must act, do activism. All isn’t lost on immigration. We’ve beaten back about 7 or 8 of these mass amnesties before. We can do so again. Please give the RINOs like queer Lindsey Graham, McCain, Paul Ryan, Neo Con Jew Republic Eric Cantor and now Rand Paul lots of negative feedback on their immigration treason.
Just think what people like us who are Japanese or Israeli would do to such traitors in their countries?
Thanks everyone.
I regret every saying anything positive about the man. His response to the State of the Union address was worse than awful.
I said good things about both Pauls. I’m embarrassed by my comments defending them on reflection. They are two smooth grifters. If they could take in a couple of pretty radical guys like us (a WNist and Southern Nationalist/secessionist), imagine how easy it must be for them to con people who far less aware.
PalmettoPatriot says:
February 21, 2013 at 1:38 am (Edit)
I regret every saying anything positive about the man. His response to the State of the Union address was worse than awful.
Jack replies:
Agreed. I talked with a Rand Paul Washington staff member and tried to give Rand an out, I asked if maybe someone just wrote this part of the speech and Rand Paul didn’t really support this nonsense.
The staff member said that Rand Paul wouldn’t say it if he didn’t mean it and then he fell down in to some rather pathetic comments about needing to help the 11 million undocumented etc.
Yea, it’s immigration treason, racial treason. And we simply must punish traitors.
Actually, all he’s doing is echoing the Libertarian Party platform. The libertarian party is all about open borders.
http://www.lp.org/issues/immigration
Mosin Nagant says:
February 21, 2013 at 1:56 am (Edit)
Remember that the unique Ron Paul strictly constitutionalist position on states rights is much more important than his libertarian philosophy.
Jack responds.
And Rhodesia Zimbabwe supposedly had a good Constitution, guaranteeing, “in theory” the protection of the White minority, guaranteeing private property etc. Lot a good it did to Whites in Zimbabwe, same as some Constitution written by White British men in the 18th century is going to do us when the power is in the hands of the likes of Obama, Eric Holder, Elena Kagan, Congressional Black Caucus, Congressional Hispanic caucus.
White Americans put way to much trust in old laws, old documents, it’s a real world power play now, between groups. And Libertarian ideas of everyone having individual rights, no collective action, they’re living in a fatal fantasy world.
I was never conned by Rand, and consistently against libertarianism as such, and my consistent support of the RON Paul presidential candidacy was based on his constitutionalism, especially regarding states rights, unconstitutionality of the pro-Zionist war, “Federal” Reserve, etc. — and his immigration philosophy was not any worse than any of the other candidates.
Mosin,
What makes you think Paul was being truthful about those positions as opposed to grifting for personal gain?
Re: “too much trust in old laws, old document”:
There you go again, with “old believer,” “old ways,” “old ideas,” “very old” etc.
But traditional conservatives do that. We conserve old ways, old laws, old documents — even as old as the Bible.
Mosin Nagant says:
February 21, 2013 at 2:27 am (Edit)
I was never conned by Rand, and consistently against libertarianism as such, and my consistent support of the RON Paul presidential candidacy was based on his constitutionalism, especially regarding states rights, unconstitutionality of the pro-Zionist war, “Federal” Reserve, etc. — and his immigration philosophy was not any worse than any of the other candidates.
Jack responds:
I have to say that Ron Paul’s immigration policy was substantially worse than all the other Presidential candidates except Obama. NumbersUSA was giving Ron Paul immigration grades of D- and many of us were publicizing his insane, treasonous immigration positions, statements. But, like the military fans of John McCain, Ron Paul cult followers wouldn’t believe anything bad said about Ron Paul. It things like this that are responsible for White Americans losing so much of our country – they stick with old political leaders they have known for years and just don’t want to hear anything negative. Wake up!
You could argue he has been faking all these years to gain and hold a little market niche that others overlooked. You could argue that if he had been elected he would have morphed into another Lincoln. In fact that Ron Paul Conspiracy Theory already exists.
I don’t worship men. I supported on the strength of his constitutionalism, and his platform that was superiour overall — much more in OUR favour than the others — but I never forget the weakness or carnality of ALL human nature!
So Romney, Gingrich, Rand and even Rubio have SOUNDED better on the invasion issue, then? The federal government is not going to stop the invasion, anyway. It is up to states and localities now. A commander in chief who recognises the right of the states and counties to enforce the constitution and nullify, and even secede, would be better than one who is less old.
Furthermore, Ron Paul’s position (or “his talk” if you’d rather) was far superiour on the very important global war and global banking issues.
Jack Ryan, you may feel a need to “flesh out” the “old believer” and the “pussyfooter” and several other models with real life human figures, and Ron Paul looks like a perfect fit.
I like most of your posts, Jack, especially your calls for practical political activism and involvement. We haven’t had a music break for awhile, but those are always well received. I agree with you on the evil of libertarianism. I cannot agree with your opposition to the Ron Paul presidential candidacy, for the reasons already stated.
By the way, I had already just been doing what you’ve just asked us to do (the modest practical suggestion) about Rand and several other race traitors.
Typical dishonesty from Peter Brimelow and VDARE. They talk about “Conservative, Inc.” without irony. VDARE is itself not that far removed from Conservative, Inc’s flagship publication (NR) in terms of misleading people with half-truths, lies by omission and bullshit.
Peter Brimelow writes: My impression of Rand Paul is that he literally hasn’t thought about the immigration issue (not unusual for cloistered libertarians) and doesn’t really understand it. (In the video linked here, although commendably citing Milton Friedman on the incompatibility of immigration and the welfare state, he confuses green cards with citizenship). It is logically possible to combine libertarianism with immigration patriotism, and Paul (like his father) has shown signs of doing so instinctively. Whether this will survive the pressures of the MSM, left-libertarian loonies, and campaign donors is questionable—unless, of course, he actually wants to be President.
Peter Brimelow writes: My impression of Rand Paul is that he literally hasn’t thought about the immigration issue (not unusual for cloistered libertarians) and doesn’t really understand it.
LOL they always say that. When some libertarian/conservative jackass that they all put their faith in comes out and spits in their face, rather than say, “Hey we were wrong about the Paul’s, they are a bunch of lying backstabbers” instead they say that the problem is that they “don’t understand the immigration issue.” My ass. They always understood it.
They are craven opportunists. It seems to me that the whole “Ron Paul revolution” was about advancing his sons political aspirations to be a GOP water boy and eventually the ultimate prize: something his father could never be, President.
That Brimelow statement is ridiculous if he meant it to be taken literally. Of course Rand Paul already DOES understand the issue. And what does Brimelow mean by “immigration patriotism”? Oxymoronic. Invasion and patriotism are opposites.
Ulfric, probably everyone who gets as far in politics as the U.S. House and Senate is bound to be “a craven politician.” But some take better or worse public positions (better or worse from our point of view) than others. We should NEVER vote for the WORST candidates (like some WN, who brag of voting for Obama just to amplify his second mandate) but rather support those who say they will do us the LEAST harm!
A couple of years ago mr. brimelow stated “any person of any race can become american.”
He admits to pulling in about $375K from vdare alone (when the economy was good).
One presumes he is in it for the money, like mr. zappa:
In what context did he say that? Complete paragraph? Do you have a link to the source? I’m not convinced he believes or wants that.
So far on this thread we have considered the Ron Paul Conspiracy Theory (Lincoln-minded lying grifter!) and a Brimelow Conspiracy Theory (immigration fear profiteer). Here is more conspiracy material: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KasQiJeJDgo
More: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3yfroBKaoE
Let’s not get all conspiracy minded, they’re just targets for training not to hestitate.
Mosin,
You need give up the ghost. For an intelligent man, you seem emotionally invested here. Look at the evidence! Their “public positions” that are somewhat favorable to us are lies. This includes Peter Brimelow and most of the VDARE writers’ public positions. Henceforth, I will refer to VDARE as Brimelow, Inc., not so such an alternative to Conservative, Inc. as a junior partner fleecing different clients.
Mosin,
Here is a link for you. It’s an article by Matt Parrott giving clear evidence of Ron Paul’s grifting. In this instance, it’s concerns Ron Paul fleecing the impoverished White Nationalist community and a lot of people of good will.
It’s obvious in retrospect Paul was a con man and grifter. I was taken in by his con game; many people were. For example, I used to buy into that bullshit about Ron Paul never voting for pork barrel earmarks. I interpreted it as an admirable stand for principle by Paul when every other Congressmen sellout was voting for earmarks. Problem is, Paul was grifting all along. It turns out that Ron Paul would take a “public position” opposing unnecessary government spending on earmarks, but then he always inserted earmarks for his district into the bill. Then, he would vote against the bill knowing it would pass and that his district would get the earmarks.
So what I thought was a principled stand was actually dishonest grifting: delivering tax-payer funded pork for his constituents while eschewing pork spending in public, AND while violating his “limited government” libertarian principles, too. The more principled Congressmen were the ones supporting the earmarks. They were honest about it.
Jack Ryan was right.
http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/02/the-real-ron-paul-scandal/
Thanks, Lew. Thanks also to Matt Parrott for the good article, the best I’ve seen along the conspiracy line. I will review it and research further. I always recognised that the Austrian and Randian (son’s namesake) connections were bad signs or serious faults.
But Lew, there is no “emotional investment,” only a reasonable judgement that he was definitely the “least evil” presidential candidate, for our purposes. The theme of “oldness” as in “old believer” etc. has annoyed me, though I know Jack’s source. Age as such is not a fault, and conservatives like proven good old things more than new untested ideas.
Don’t get all obsessed with money, conspiracy theories.
White Americans are either for us or against us, or neutral – pussyfooters.
Rand Paul and Ron Paul have been pussyfooting around for a long time.
Immigration is not a complicated subject.
Japanese people understand immigration.
Swiss people understand immigration.
OD readers SHOULD understand immigration.
But, for so many Americans they just can’t understand much of anything, what to belive – can we believer anything?
Yes we can.
Rand Paul is pandering on immigration, taking the 30 pieces of silver to betray our people and to get access to the MSM – mainstream media.
We must punish traitors.
14 words
It’s an article by Matt Parrott giving clear evidence of Ron Paul’s grifting. In this instance, it’s concerns Ron Paul fleecing the impoverished White Nationalist community and a lot of people of good will.
Yeah many White nationalists back in 2008 gave serious money to Paul only for him to drop out the race early on so he could run for his house seat again.
Jamie Kelso was a huge supporter of Paul and I think he actually worked for Paul if my memory serves. Kelso claimed that Ron Paul was right up there with the founding fathers.
Where did all that money that Paul raised go to btw? Rand Pauls Senate run?
I had heard of the earmarks added to bills he voted against years ago. There was little new in the Parrott article, but he makes a strong case, does it well. I tend to agree but why would anyone vote for anti-states rights, pro-Fed, pro-Zionist war candidates when there is another choice who is RIGHT on those issues. There was no significant difference among Republican candidates in immigration philosophy, but the states rights constitutionalist position put one ahead of the others, from our purposes.
So far we have learned that Peter Brimelow and Ron Paul have been out to fleece, and otherwise gain advantage through WNs or traditional patriotic conservatives….
Let’s continue this study another day.
“But traditional conservatives do that. We conserve old ways, old laws, old documents — even as old as the Bible.”
Where are those things conserved? Second hand bookstores?
“But, like the military fans of John McCain, Ron Paul cult followers wouldn’t believe anything bad said about Ron Paul. It things like this that are responsible for White Americans losing so much of our country – they stick with old political leaders they have known for years and just don’t want to hear anything negative. Wake up!”
Before McCain ran for president, I wrote in to VDARE for their letter of the day. It got posted. I suggested that maybe McCain’s intense desire to flood America with non-whites grew from a wellspring of hatred he slowly developed during his long years of captivity during Vietnam. I suggested that maybe during that imprisonment, McCain started thinking he had been abandoned by America and thus a slow fuse of hatred began to burn in the inner recesses of his mind.
I allowed my e-mail address to be published when they chose to publish my letter. For about two or three weeks afterwards I received hostile mail the gist of most of which consisted of “how could you say something like that about a veteran, war hero,” etc., etc., and didn’t I know that anyone like that was a real American with our best interests at heart.
It was sickening to realize how stupid most American’s really must be, and the kind of shit they believe. I know you don’t like bad language but there really is no other adequate enough word for to describe it, and if there is ever an appropriate time and place for the word, it is surely for describing what goes for thinking in far too many American mind’s.
LOL they always say that. When some libertarian/conservative jackass that they all put their faith in comes out and spits in their face, rather than say, “Hey we were wrong about the Paul’s, they are a bunch of lying backstabbers” instead they say that the problem is that they “don’t understand the immigration issue.” My ass. They always understood it.
Lol, you WNs so painfully fucking dumb it’s embarrassing. Even I’m embarrassed for you, and I hate WNs with a passion and fury unlike anything you’ve ever encountered.
Now, look here dipshit, if Republicans DO understand the immigration issue, as one must assume they do, then if they’re to ever take a patriotic stance on it (meaning, at a minimum, moratorium) then they need plausible excuses for why they never BEHAVED as though they understood it. That’s what Brimelow’s positioning permits them. And that’s where having a media outlet on your side is so helpful. Attack Brimelow and you’re simply devouring your own.
There you go again, with “old believer,” “old ways,” “old ideas,” “very old” etc.
But traditional conservatives do that. We conserve old ways, old laws, old documents . . ..
Perhaps that is why conservatives lose almost every battle.
Jack Ryan has the right view here. Conservatives place far, far too much faith in the Constitution, a document respected by maybe half the population and understood by perhaps 10%. It has become useful only as far as it advances the Leftist cause. It was a workable document back when America was one nation, it hamstrings us now. Example: 14th Amendment-hastily written and very poorly worded, interpreted totally out of context.
I was rather harsh a few years back in reaction to Hunter Wallace expressing the opinion that Libertarians were a problem and should be a target. I was wrong about that. HW was right.
Most Libertarians are no more ideologically-sincere than anyone else. They see it as a strategy FOR NOW, the nearest idea to them being able to keep some of their own stuff, the creativity of their own hands, out of the grubby paws of military-welfare or welfare-welfare, or whatever other Generational SDF’s. (State Dependent Families).
Maybe most at OD have, or have had, “public employment.”
That comes from SOMEWHERE, lol.
Oh— right, but they are “great white inventors” and so therefore the (equally white and maybe even whiter) “proles”, who maybe weren’t always wage earners, must create wealth, so those other Smart White People can collect it and spend it in the “best way,” and to justify being a SDF, they wind up saying the others are just… well, you know, rednecks, and so on. Big dummies. “Our weaker links.” B/c they know how to spend other people’s money better than the creators of the wealth.
Underneath all the defamation lives a (White) Freeloader.
At least Libertarians are clear on that.
Brimelow knows God damn well the national GOP will never do anything about immigration.
He gets the impression is Rand Paul is supporting immigration because he is pretending to not understand it so he later has a plausible pretext to oppose it. Er, right.
This isn’t Brimelow’s first time around the track. He wrote Alien Nation over 20 years ago. One of the worst, most dispicable, and evil things are person purporting to be for white folks can do is suggest maybe there is yet hope for the Republican Party. Brimelow is wasting people’s time, telling half-truths, impeding radical thinking. At least he’s making some bank in his position as Chairman and CEO of Brimelow, Inc.
Now, look here dipshit, if Republicans DO understand the immigration issue, as one must assume they do, then if they’re to ever take a patriotic stance on it (meaning, at a minimum, moratorium) then they need plausible excuses for why they never BEHAVED as though they understood it. That’s what Brimelow’s positioning permits them. And that’s where having a media outlet on your side is so helpful. Attack Brimelow and you’re simply devouring your own.
Thanks to everyone who contributed positive comments, especially those who understood my long standing effort to expose open borders immigration traitors.
Also, understand that I do not think that Rand Paul or even Ron Paul or any libertarians have to be traitors to our people for ever.
Rand Paul and Ron Paul fall in to the category of these types of racial traitors:
Libertarian true believers
Pussyfooters
With White pussyfooters all that needs to be done is to change the cultural/political power structure, as these pussyfooters “go with the flow”.
If it becomes simple a fact of life that noone with any semblence of Libertarian positions is ever elected or is even allowed to be on TV, accepted in public when they support mass race replacement immigration, then they will change.
Ron Paul and Rand Paul like most people, like to be successful, they don’t like to be marginalized and forced to live under bridges, live in caves.
This should be our tactic.
Don’t try to use “reason” to get open borders immigration Libertarians to “change” their immigration policies. Just change the social system, they don’t get invited to debates, they speak to empty halls, they’re not on TV all the time. This is the same effective strategy the Left uses to silence, marginalize men on our side, men like Lou Dobbs, Pat Buchanan, even Juan Williams (dared to say he felt a little scared seeing Muslim immigrants in full Muslim dress after 9-11).
For the record, I think Peter Brimelow is one of modern America’s greatest immigration control, racial realist patriots. The fact that he like Pat Buchanan has been able to maintain some access to mainstream political, financial world should give hope to others that one can work for the legitimate rights of our people and still have a decent career, have a family, enjoy some financial success. Peter Brimelow marries White, has beautiful White wives (one died) and beautiful White children. I also like the fact that Brimelow concentrates on doing one thing, one thing that he does:
Publishing excellent books and articles about the national question. He doesn’t try to be things that he can be competitive at – like running for President of the United States.
I’m popping in to check the thread, then offline the rest of the day. I wanted to add to my previous comment (it was getting too late to finish it last night) that I have never imagined that a constitutionalist (as Ron Paul has claimed to be) Commander in Chief who allowed states, counties and municipalities to deport invaders, and to nullify, and even secede, would NOT be impeached or overruled somehow, or “removed.” Nor have I thought ANY states, counties or even municipalities have already reached (perhaps they never will) the “critical mass” of electoral opinion necessary to BEGIN serious deportation, nullification, etc. and be able to take advantage of the support or sympathy of a constitutionalist President.
Jack Ryan’s call to exterminate the careers of all politicians showing traits of libertarianism, and viewing all politicians through the lens of the Models (“old believer,” “pussyfooter,” etc.) may not be wise.
I agree with Jack fully on Peter Brimelow. I’ve met Peter, but Jack not yet. Jack, we’ll agree to agree on Rand (I was NEVER a Rand supporter), and let us agree to disagree (at least for the time being) on the RON presidential candidacy. It’s history anyway. But if we don’t learn from history….
As I said earlier, before you posted this “modest practical suggestion” I had actually already done it. I hope more OD readers will follow your suggestion.
I met Brimelow at an event about 20 years ago. He was there to speak on Alien Nation. A Jew lawyer was present to give an opposing view. Most of the crowd was against Brimelow. I tried to help him out by heckling the Jew lawyer when it was his turn to speak. At one point, he held up a picture of a decapitated Haitian. At the time, there was a debate about Haitian refugees possibly landing in South Florida to escape problems in Haiti. The Jew lawyer began waving the picture and shrieking “This is what Peter Brimelow wants! This is what he wants!”
The point being, that was 20 years ago. I think he deserved the benefit of the doubt back then. Maybe even 10 years ago. Hell, maybe even 2 years ago (to be generous). Enough is enough though. Brimelow has a had front seat for 20 years watching Republicans and conservatives sell out white people. He knows what’s going on now if not then. There is no way he could not know. The only explanation that makes sense for him continuing to speak like the GOP and Paul are legitimate is that he is on the con.
Brimelow knows God damn well the national GOP will never do anything about immigration.
Brimelow doesn’t ‘know’ that and neither do you.
He gets the impression is Rand Paul is supporting immigration because he is pretending to not understand it so he later has a plausible pretext to oppose it. Er, right.
What is so implausible about Brimelow trying to make it easier for Republicans to take a stand on immigration?
One of the worst, most dispicable, and evil things are person purporting to be for white folks can do is suggest maybe there is yet hope for the Republican Party.
Sure, if you ignore the fact that 90% (or whatever outsized proportion) of the GOP’s votes come from whites.
Lew,
Your comments on Peter Brimelow are ridiculous. Peter Brimelow has been solid and effective on immigration, the national issue from his time as a senior editor at National Review before the Jew Neo Con purge, to the present. Brimelow even published Kevin MacDonald. Vdare has a great mix of immigration coverage and Black crime, Muslim terrorism, without ever going for Neo Cons. Vdare has slammed Rand Paul as soon as Rand Paul made the treasonous speech on immigration after the state of the union.
I understand people are frustrated so they are lashing out at everyone.
Silver,
I just don’t see how you get to that conclusion. I mean, what are you seeing/thinking that leads you to believe it might be possible? There is more than enough evidence, starting with 50 years of inaction, to conclude the national GOP will never do anything meaningful about immigration.