Mississippi
Fastforward to 55 minutes.
“Could you exterminate a Jewish child yourself?” – Hunter Wallace, 2012
“I’m not going to answer absurd hypothetical questions like that.” – Alex Linder, 2012
“If you walk into a room with a 6-year-old Jewish child and blew her brains out that is murder, and that is immoral, and White people are not going to stand for that, even in Kirksville.” – Hunter Wallace, 2012
“As he headed to the gym at the Jewish Community Center on Sunday, Paul Temme heard gunshots, peered around a vehicle and saw a man firing into the passenger side of a car.
The man had just shot William Lewis Corporon, 69, in the head with a shotgun. Corporon had crumpled to the pavement. Now the gunman was standing on the car’s passenger side, holding what appeared to be a handgun, pumping bullets through the passenger window at Corporon’s grandson, who was still in his seat.”
Rudel,I was going to say something about Sam’s ridiculous rant, but you beat me to it. I have Peter’s book on the Inquisitions too, but recommending it to a person who doesn’t want to be confused by the facts because his mind is made up is a waste of time.
BTW, have you ever read Henry Kamen’s book on the Spanish Inquisition? His book revolutionized the study of the SI. And because he’s Jewish, no one can honestly claim he’s biased toward the Church. I imagined he pissed off a lot of his fellow Jews and a lot of ‘Bible Christians’ with his historical revisionism. Some people hate to see their fantasies destroyed.
Here’s the latest from Alex:
See, I am abusing his character.
I’ve abused his character by reminding everyone that Alex has been preached “exterminate the Jews” to every unhinged, unstable, impressionable nut – and there have been legions of them – that has washed up on his shores for over 10 years now.
It’s my fault that Alex went on Israeli television in Kirksville and advocated “exterminate the Jews.” It’s my fault that he advocates “exterminate the Jews” in his VNN signature. In our many debates over the years, it’s my fault that Alex never backed down from his position that the Jews ought to be exterminated.
Well, I suppose this is understandable.
In times like this, it is much more comforting to lash out at someone like me or call Greg a faggot than to wrestle with the thought that his own friend, Glenn Miller, drove all the way across Missouri and into Kansas, pumping himself up full of all the bile that Alex had spewed over the years about the need to “exterminate the Jews,” before he pulled out his handgun and pumped several rounds through a passenger window into 14-year-old Reat Griffin Underwood.
Hunter, Linder is “Wasting away in WNville, looking for his lastest excuse. He wants to blame the Jooos and you, but he ought to know, it’s his own damn fault.”
Celestrial Time is right on the mark… and funny to boot:
‘I’d say there’s a better shot at the sub-Saharan Space Program finally making it to the Moon with their new flatulence-powered rocket technology than there is that Linder isn’t a government asset—paid or otherwise.’
“Some people hate to see their fantasies destroyed.”
There are a lot of retards who post on here who when apprised of the facts simply regurgitate their stupid conspiracy theories as if repeating a lie will some how make it true. They also think that “I’m a -insert religious sect here- and you’re not” and “You are a Yankee so you must be wrong” or “it’s wrong to attack fellow Whites” are valid arguments when discussing historical facts. The thing is, they are just reinforcing the stereotype of the pig ignorant goober who has never seen the inside of a library in their entire life.
Alex Linder [paraphrasing] – “Convincing evidence shows Jews are working to exterminate whites. Response should be to exterminate Jews.”
Noel Ignatiev- “We need to abolish the white race.”
This society’s opinion leaders treat these men and those statements differently. Why? Compare, contrast, explain.
Afterthought says:
April 17, 2014 at 1:02 am
“Don Black has a long history with Miller; his problems with Miller?
1. He’s a snitch, specifically against his friends in the Order
2. He’s a coward
3. He’s a drunk
Not his exterminationist rhetoric. Black must know that past and future Millers are on Stormfront. He is afraid to take a stand against that nonsense, even though I suspect he personally has “evolved”. He has too many “friends” who are Hitlerphiles, 14/88 and all that. Stormfront is swimming with that backward looking stuff. Putin (who is alive, and successful, unlike Hitler) would be awesome persona to replace Hitler for good in the minds of those who need that kind of thing. But Putin is routinely savaged on Stormfront by the 14/88 types. Don “can see both sides”, when what we need is leadership to bury Hitlerphilia.
White and normal. White and normal. White and normal. It really works.”
I think you’re right about Don Black. He said on his radio show, he wished he went the Gandhi route years ago.
I have also heard it said the money in WN is in Jews. If you stop talking about Jews the money supply stops.
So talking about Jews keeps the cash flowing in, but keeps normal Whites away. Do something that keeps WN on the fringes and money is sent your way. Do something that is good for WN and the money supply is choked off.
If I was a conspiracy theorist, I would think there was something to that.
Let the Jews have the exterminationist rhetoric. Oh wait. They already do.
Not even the most determined Vantardist will come up with exterminationist rhetoric that tops The Talmud and the King’s Torah.
In all the genocides of the Revolutionary Era (formally inaugurated 1779), the Jews have been exterminators and genociders in the service of their ideologies, both in their own character and through proxies. White nation activism should always make sure their colours are nailed to the mast.
Rudel, here are some good reviews of your ‘unbiased’ history:
‘ Like many noticed who read this book, the author shows a pro-Catholic stance. For example he implies that the “Protestants” such as Luther, were and are unable to show their validity due to the fact they can’t trace a continuing line (…) Although much of the book appears factual, I do not recommend using it as the sole source on the Inquisition or the Waldensian denomination which it mentions, and goes over poorly, not mentioning what many of them believed. I imagine the author did not go into what the Waldensian’s believed because it would have been evidence that the true church has always been on earth rather than mysteriously having disappeared as so many Catholics would try to get you to believe in order to convert you’ — and ‘This book is as close to a whitewash of the Inquisition as a scholar can get without losing credibility. Peters does seem to get his basic facts right and in this regard his account actually agrees in large part with the Protestant scholars who have been most critical of the Inquisition. It is Peters emphasis which is troubling. When Peters does present information embarrassing to the Catholic Church (such as the Pope’s letter declaring death as the appropriate punishment for heretics)it is presented only briefly. His pro-Catholic spin can be blatant at times. For example, he refers several times to the 13th century papal legate, Castelnau, who was murdered most likely by anti-Catholic foes. While this ONE death is regretable, in this same time period many THOUSANDS were killed by the Catholics – many of whose names we do know and whose stories would be illustrative, but Peters is vague about these victims and mentions none by name. The overall effect of this book is to play down the Inquisition as really no big deal’.
As for Scot-Jew Dalton’s favourite Jewish historian who also favours the Roman side, while giving Jews more of the credit they deserve…well, I’ve already reviewed Henry Kamenstein’s historical bias here before.
Thanks. We should invite Mr. Peters (such a shame for a likely Welsh name) to a debate at the Fifth of November party.
Re: ‘regurgitate their stupid conspiracy theories as if repeating a lie will some how make it true (…) they are just reinforcing the stereotype of the pig ignorant goober’.
What exactly ARE the ‘pig ignorant goober’ (denigration of rural folk?) ‘conspiracy theories’ you are referring to? I have never noticed ANY comments on OD about HAARP, flu vaccine, Ancient Alien, Planet Nibiru or any other ‘conspiracy theory’ (an almost Orwellian term, especially when it is used to denigrate FACTS) that I consider foolish, or ill-informed, misguided.
The ROOT cause afflicting the entire white nationalist movement lies in its inability to shed ALL connections to past historical (and failed) events. Notice if you will that virtually all the bad press WN gets comes from those who advocate or pay homage to Nazism. The evidence is absolutely overwhelming. And just look at some recent pro-Nazi advocates: Craig “14% non-white” Cobb, who flipped his biscuits in Leith, ND. Alex Linder – long a pro-Hitlerite. Glenn “Sieg Heil!” Miller. Don Black who used to paste Nazi icons all over his filthy website. And then there’s David Duke. Just search Google for a photo of him in Nazi garb. Now he’s a stealth Nazi, just like Lurch. Finally, even the younger WN crowd (like Matt Heimbach) now associates with Nazis.
Then there are the “The South Shall Rise Again” froot loops (like the League of the South, KKK, and others) who wallow in fantasies of a reborn Confederate States of America when no such thing will ever happen again.
Drop it.
Drop the Nazi worship and the Civil War worship. Clean out your brains with a can of Drano if necessary but drop this sick worship of things that are now dead and gone. Because pretend Nazis and pretend Confederates (Glenn Miller was both) are just sick-fucks and anyone who even remotely has connections or contacts with these groups or beliefs are sick-fucks too.
That’s completely untrue. Well, maybe not completely, but it is certainly not an accurate picture if one were trying to gauge the amount of untapped White support that is out there. Yes, there are most definitely groups out there that want to keep the fringe on the fringe. They will pay a few thousand dollars as an investment that has the possibility for a return in the hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars. If nothing else, they keep the pro-White sphere confined to predictable standards of mediocrity. But spotting that kind of stuff and understanding what kind of “troll” is most damaging to your image and growth is the job of website owners and moderators. You lose focus of that or don’t have the right mentality and skills to do it effectively, then you fail.
A big part of the problem is that Don seems to have thought he could play both sides by allowing so many negative personalities to fester for so long. “Hey, we’re not about hate, but we sure do have a lot of haters and social pariahs who insult and berate the average White person who comes to Stormfront.” I’ve met Don and Derek once. The contrast between both their personalities(online and offline) and the average Stormfront member is like night and day. A website or company or group should somewhat resemble the personality and mannerisms of the owners. So I just don’t understand how Stormfront is only a rung or two above VNN when the difference between someone like Linder and Don Black is so great. I kind of understand how Derek ended up in the position he’s in now.
In my honest opinion, I think Don is a really bad judge of character when it comes to delegating power. Maybe he’s gotten lazy with it. Maybe he’s just fed up and doesn’t care. I don’t know. One tiny example is the way he gave Al Kelz the green light to berate and chastise members as losers and leeches if they weren’t donating to Stormfront. That guy just doesn’t have a future as a motivational speaker. If you go look on the Miller thread on SF, you’ll see good ole Al berating members for daring to connect the dots with the obvious links to Miller and VNN/Linder:
You don’t go to Stormfront to grow or be part of a mechanism that values your input or unique perspective. You go to Stormfront to be told what to think by people that have a track record of failure year after year. You are given a script to read and told not to deviate from that script. They have it all figured out for you. Question that script or draw your own conclusions or point to inconsistencies, then you are a “troll” and not one of us. Donate now, donate forever, and just keep your opinions to yourself and your mouth shut.
That kind of atmosphere only attracts and nurtures a few types of personalities. And none of those personality types are indicative of the kind of person that is going to be the impetus for a larger racial awakening. You want to lose? Then you find losers. You want to win? You find winners, or you find people with the right characteristics and abilities to win, and then give them a platform and a little leeway. Can’t spot the winners or potential winners? Well, you’re just shit out of luck. It’s that simple.
Celestial Time
I’ve met Don several times, entirely at CofCC conferences. You’re right about the difference between Don in person and Stormfront in practice in terms of personality. I also think that’s the case ideologically speaking; I think Don would be personally more comfortable in a medium like this than his own, because I don’t think Don is really comfortable with Vantardism.
Hereward Saxon, where did that ridiculous review of Peters book come from? I saw no name or link for the review, so how am I or Rudel supposed to believe it has any credibility when we don’t know where it came from or who even wrote it?
Your dismissal of Kamen’s work shows the typical bigoted attitude of someone who swallowed The Black Legend myth hook, line, and sinker. Kamen, like you, believed it too, until he started to look at the actual primary sources and documents of the Inquisition. What he discovered totally demolished the Black Legend that the British secret services and their clerical helpers pushed for hundreds of years. I’d suggest that you read both books, and put aside your prejudgements, and read what they actually say, instead of reading into them.
Classic Brad:
(Skip to 31:13) “The reason I’m not a White Nationalist is because I keep having bad experiences with White Nationalists.”
Not because there’s anything wrong with White Nationalism as an ideology. Just because some White Nationalists do things like kill 3 people isn’t the reason why he’s not one, it’s because of the bad experiences, like people calling him names and claiming he’s a SPLC plant, that’s the reason he’s not a Whiye Nationalist. Sometimes it’s not what you say, it’s what you don’t say.
Brad is White and from the South, therefore, he’s a Southern White Nationalist. It’s an entirely separate category. Alex Linder is Brad’s sacrificial White Nationalist lamb. Brad’s trying to dump Alex and WN overboard as quickly as possible.
More Classic Brad:
(Skip to 31:56) “But I keep having bad experiences with White Nationalists, and it got to the point where I realized, just because someone is White, that doesn’t necessarily mean that I’m like them or I want to be associated with them.”
Yes, because associations are all fun and games until 3 innocent people end up in a morgue. Brad could renounce White Nationalism now and forever and now out, but he won’t, because Southern White Nationalists, they’re different.
“Peters does seem to get his basic facts right and in this regard his account actually agrees in large part with the Protestant scholars who have been most critical of the Inquisition.”
Good. Then you agree with his research that shows that the murder of heretics lie in victim totals in the thousands rather than the ridiculous and undocumented claim of “hundreds of thousands.”
And let me reiterate: Most of the victims of the religious wars were the millions who died in the Thirty Years War.
More Brad:
(Skip to 32:08)
Brad Griffin: “Let me put it this way, the way I understand it is that White Nationalists all want to move to a certain location, a central location and create their White ethnostate. Right? Well, I’m sitting here thinking to myself, “If half the damn people that I’ve met over the internet over the years move to my community, would that be an improvement?” Probably… Do I want everyone on the VNN forum to move to my hometown? To my neighborhood? To my city? No. I would rather have people like the guy who found my wallet the other day. That’s the kind of person I would like to have as my neighbor.”
(Skip to 33:01)
Alex Linder: “Then Brad, why are you involved with so-called “extreme politics”? “Politics ain’t beanbag”. That’s the famous expression man.”
Brad Griffin: “I quit. I got out. I got, I got out of White… I got out of White Nationalism. I don’t want to be around people like that.”
Here’s an example of Brad “not being around people like that” a matter of days before a person like that took the lives of 3 innocent people:
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=178990
“Rounder”, aka Glenn Miller (alleged murderer):
“Don’t get discouraged by the lack of support, or “atta-boys” from net warriors, Brad.
That’ll come when you put more boots on the ground, so work hard on recruiting, recruiting, recruiting. Yaw’ll don’t solicit for more “boots” in local newspapers or radio ads or flyers asking locals to “come on out and join us”.
We’re watching you, though. So amaze us with your ingenuity, guts, and leadership. And name the GD jew more.”
“What exactly ARE the ‘pig ignorant goober’ (denigration of rural folk?) ‘conspiracy theories’ you are referring to?”
Although there are no massive peanut farms in Pennsylvania, your repeated assertions in the face of contemporary historical documents to the contrary, that Columbus was a some sort of Jew put you solidly in the goober camp.
More Rounder for you:
“I would have bet money and given odds that Ron Doggett would be there. For over 30 years he’s participated in most credible PUBLIC events staged within 200-300 miles of where he lives. And of course, many public events staged further away than that.
Thanks Ron, for standing tall yet again in PUBLIC, and beside Brad and his brave friends.”
Re: Spelunkstein
As the gallery here will remind you, I have written far more detailed essays on this website about the flaws of White Nationalism.
In the radio show above, I mentioned the cumulative weight of all the bad experiences that I had with White Nationalists. It’s true that was a major reason why I left the White Nationalist movement, but that is just a reflection of my substantial criticism that White Nationalism is based on race and ideology.
White Nationalists lack a common culture. Without a common culture, it is hard for White Nationalists to relate to each other and quell internal disputes, and even harder to pool resources to work toward common goals. The Glenn Miller rampage shooting is actually a brilliant illustration of this.
White Nationalists, who want to preserve our culture, can’t even agree among themselves that murder is immoral.
Renounce it and replace it with what, Multiculturalism?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/04/16/1292565/-An-Idahoan-shows-Bundy-what-a-real-Western-rancher-is?
Check out the genocidal rhetoric here. All kosher, when it’s about a man who has 14 children isn’t it Spelunkstein?
Check out the awful hate in the comment section.
This was a doozie…
An AC-130 really leaves an impression.
Literally.
An airborne 105mm howitzer will most certainly educate those faux militias to obey the law.
And I mean faux. A real militia can still be private, however it is always, always, always under the direction for mobilizing of their county seat, governor or POTUS. Not by its inner leadership.
That is where the majority of those pinheads have gone wrong.
by Wzrd1 on Thu Apr 17, 2014 at 09:34:36 AM PDT
[ Parent | Reply to This | Recommend Hide ]
Perhaps Spelunkstein ought to be hide rating comments on Dkos.
Once again, Spelunkstein is demonstrating his unreliability.
In the radio show, I told Alex Linder that murder is immoral, confronted him on his position that the Jews should be exterminated, and even outlined a hypothetical scenario in which his so-called “principled position” was acted on.
As for Glenn Miller, he supported my idea of holding peaceful public demonstrations, and it’s a shame that he didn’t channel his energies into something similar in Missouri.
If VNN Forum members had responded positively to my call to engage in productive activism as an outlet for their grievances instead of ridiculing the idea, it is unlikely that Miller would have chosen lone wolf rampage shootings as his outlet.
I’m glad that I went over there, criticized Linder, and offered them a constructive alternative.
More Kulak hatred:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/04/12/1291439/-The-Bundy-Ranch-flashpoint-a-Nevadan-s-perspective
The ranchers ancestors have been there since 1880 btw.
It’s fascinating to guess the ethnicity of the commentariat on this story.
Odd Thomas: A people need a past. We need stories of our ancestors. Uncritical worship of Hitler and National Socialism have several problems for us today. We face different problems than they did. As you point out, they failed, but not in every way and at all times.The NSDAP took control of a great nation in a difficult time and brought about cultural and economic revival. Perhaps we can learn from both their successes and failures. Finally wearing swastikas and referring to Hitler will turn people off, although it is hard to know to what extent their reputation is based on reality vs. propaganda and the prohibition to even question the holocaust.
But the people turned off by Confederate flags are not our people anyway, and why shouldn’t we be inspired by men like Forrest and Lee? I believe genes have a part in determining culture, but our culture in large measure grows out of our history. Our families and nation are given to us by our ancestors. If we forget them, what do we have left to work for?
Brad, I’ve noted what you told Linder, that point is not lost. Your continued immersion in White Nationalism is what us being questioned. Sorry, I know you prefer Southern White Nationalism, because it’s more palatable.
I plan on transcribing parts of your debate. You did take Linder to task over his extermination of the Jews. Moving on from that, do you feel any sense of shame yourself for continuing to be a part of that which we’re not supposed to call by name? Just because you go on a radio program and say, “I’m not a White Nationalist”, doesn’t make it so. A large majority of White Nationalists want the same thing Brad does, an all White homeland. Brad lives in Alabama, so he’s not a Yankee, other than that, the two types of White Nationalist are virtually indistinguishable. I can show you examples of things Southern White Nationalists have said recently that are just as blushworthy, if not more than the other White meat. Brad, are you ever really going to get out?
Re: Spelunkstein
1.) There are substantial differences between Southern Nationalism and White Nationalism, which I have written detailed articles about that for several years now, and one of the most important differences is that Southern Nationalism is based on the idea that White Southerners are a people who share a common culture, and for that reason ought to have their own nation-state to preserve that culture, whereas White Nationalism is based on race and abstract ideology.
In Southern Nationalism, there is a consensus that Christianity is our religion and provides the moral foundation of Southern culture, which we want to preserve, as well as a consensus that religious minorities will be tolerated. There is no such cultural consensus in White Nationalism. In fact, there is even a debate on basic moral questions like whether murder is immoral, which puts into stark relief the lack of a common culture.
2.) Obviously, I have family ties to White Nationalism through the CofCC.
3.) No, I don’t.
I don’t advocate murdering people. I said in my speech at the Alabama LS conference that I wanted our activism to inspire others. In hindsight, I wish that our activism and ideas had been better received at VNN Forum, and that Rounder could have channeled his energies in a constructive direction rather than a purely destructive one. From what I know of Glenn Miller, he would have pounced on something like that if he had reason to believe that option was on the table.
4.) I’ve already outlined here on my website how a White homeland could be created – new suburbs are created all the time in the South, there is plenty of land here, and there is no reason why Whites shouldn’t be allowed to build their own racially exclusive communities in an independent South.
5.) Yes, I can also show you how the children of tolerance behave in the comment section over at the SPLC website.
Wanna know why some people like a flag that’s not the CBF more?
http://www.whty.org/campaign.htm
Bad Propaganda
Brad, you share the same ideals as Linder. Difference between you and him is that he has the character, you’re a vacillator. Don’t try and worm your way out of it, you’re involved in it too, you’re just as much a Nazi to the rest of the world. Or to quote Greg Johnson:
“The eyes of the world are upon you, gentlemen, and instead of rising to the occasion and displaying some dignity and gravitas, you are mostly acting like smutty, sniggering teenagers. ”
Sorry to burst your bubble, but I have never been interested in Nazism or the WW2 era. Linder’s “character” is that he is a psychopath who has exhibited no remorse or sympathy for the people who were killed in Kansas.
We don’t use the US flag.
Brad, as someone who might fit some vague criteria for ‘WN,’ I have to say that your giving an audience to Linder makes you look as dumb as a bunch of rocks. I can’t imagine hanging out in the same room as that man, and I advocate staunchly (if no one’s noticed) for a white ethnostate free from the oppression of judaism and it’s inherent supremacist tyranny.
Schpielunkstein, was it okay for the jews to advocate for, and impose mass murder on so many in the service of, a jewish state?
Hankees, I oppose murder, mass, or otherwise.
I would also love if Schplunk or anyone else might help me figure out why:
1. there were no ambulances whatsoever at the scene of the KC murders
2. there were so few cars in the parking lot for a JCC which supposedly held auditions
featuring ‘hundreds’ of kids, most of whom were below driving age
3. there were no photographs of the inevitable mass of parents who would have driven
to the scene to check on, collect and desperately hug, their kids
4. there was no footage of the schoolyard where Miller was supposedly apprehended,
even as there is some of him being taken into a squad car and ‘heiling Hitler’ so
opportunely
5. would Miller have opted to go peacefully after having allegedly shot three people,
and after having survived three years in federal prison, which he is alleged to have
detested (wouldn’t everyone?), and after having done two tours in Viet Nam
6. wouldn’t there be footage of the various interviews with rabbis, staff, escaping teens
even if it would have meant waiting for a few hours for a story that’s made front
pages for days
7. would any normal mother be holding a press conference within 24-48 hours in which she evinces no signs of shock, but instead makes a sober, restrained but emotional paean for all to be happy her baby (and to any normal mother a 14 year old boy is still her baby and always will be), went to heaven, after watching him get shot to death
In the ‘godless’ northeast, the bereaved in Sandy Hook were reminded to take their happy pills, and thank The State that their little ones died blissfully in its all powerful arms. In the heartland, the survivors of the three victims are shepherded calmly but caringly back into the god-fearing fold, whether it be the zio-catholic Almighty or the zio-protestant one.
I don’t profess to know what the answers to my questions are, I just felt like asking them.
Spelunker says:
April 17, 2014 at 6:13 pm
“Hankees, I oppose murder, mass, or otherwise.”
You support White Genocide.
https://movies.yahoo.com/news/howard-stern-white-supremacist-interview-suddenly-doesn-t-002243787.html
Hahahahahahaha tell me the one about the Holohoax while you’re at it Hankees. I’m not responsible for filling the blanks in for you, only myself. I’m really just a shape shifting reptilian.
“You support White Genocide.”
Clearly the topic was murder. You are trying to change the subject to demographic shifts which are not murder. Come back when you have some facts and we’ll talk sweetness.
Either way, I don’t support White Genocide. Not a single White person I know or family member has lost their life. Must be different wherever you are. Have you considered moving?
Genocide is not simply physical extermination.
Hankees, you nailed it! Miller is CGI! They almost got us again!
Brad, Hankees alone is enough of a reason for you to get away. I know the 6 figures you probably have coming to you is too hard to pass up, but really, is it worth it? I made 6 figures for two years in a row once, it wasn’t all it was cracked up to be.
Your justification for White Genocide, based on anti-White dictionary definitions, will hold no weight in a court of law.
The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.
Article 2
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Article 3
The following acts shall be punishable:
(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide.
I was asked if it was ok for Jews to advocate for mass murder. My answer was I oppose mass murder or any murder. I never mentioned genicide, which as you pointed out is not necessarily physical extermination. Someone else claimed I support White Genocide, I don’t. There is no mass murder of Whites happening in this country. The only thing I can be left to conclude is this person is referring to demographic shifts, which I was not addressing. Since I’m not discussing demographic shifts, if the person wants to talk about my supporting White Genocide, show it to me. I’m not seeing it. The physical aspect of it. Are demographic shifts occurring? Certainly. Am I discussing that? No.
The attempt to turn all White countries into non-White countries, via massive immigration and force integration, is clearly the destruction of an identifiable group.
Trying to create a world where Whites do not exist in the future, is a clear case of Genocide.
I’m happy to take a check for simply posing a few questions:
8. What does anyone suppose the chances are of the lone parent (and relative) of two of the three victims spontaneously showing up at the very time her son and father were being shot, while none of the other kids were outside, nor none of the other parents gathering there to collect them?
9. Where were all the SWAT or what have you teams who should have been securing the area to locate what could have been another possible gunman? Wasn’t Nazism a group effort? Would they take the word of a depraved psychopath that he acted alone? If he was a ‘white supremacist’ but was capable of speaking with them (or of being believed) then wouldn’t he have been capable of discerning that young Reat was clearly not a jew?
Hey Swen guess what? IDGAF. I’m not in court or on trial.
No where in UN law is mass murder mentioned.
UN law allows no “tricky means” of eliminating identifiable groups.
There are no loop holes for Genociders.