By Hunter Wallace
If the top marginal income tax rate on the wealthy was raised from the current 39.6 percent to 40 percent, The New York Times is saying it would raise enough revenue – from just the top 0.1 percent – to eliminate college tuition at public 4-year universities:
“To get the most accurate picture possible, throw in all the scraps of income, from the most obvious (like wages, interest and dividends) to the least (like employer contributions to health plans, overseas earnings and growth in retirement accounts). According to that measure — used by the Tax Policy Center, a joint project of the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution — the top 1 percent includes about 1.13 million households earning an average income of $2.1 million.
Raising their total tax burden to, say, 40 percent would generate about $157 billion in revenue the first year. Increasing it to 45 percent brings in a whopping $276 billion. Even taking account of state and local taxes, the average household in this group would still take home at least $1 million a year.
If the tax increase were limited to just the 115,000 households in the top 0.1 percent, with an average income of $9.4 million, a 40 percent tax rate would produce $55 billion in extra revenue in its first year.
That would more than cover, for example, the estimated $47 billion cost of eliminating undergraduate tuition at all the country’s four-year public colleges and universities, as Senator Bernie Sanders has proposed, or Mrs. Clinton’s cheaper plan for a debt-free college degree, with money left over to help fund universal prekindergarten. …”
Compare the $47 billion dollar annual price tag of eliminating college tuition at public universities to the $2 trillion dollars already squandered on the cuckservative crusade in Iraq alone or the extra $100 billion a year we are paying on medical and disability claims from veterans after a decade of useless wars in Muslim countries.
Most of those poor soldiers joined the military to finance their college education. How much cheaper would it have been just to have free college tuition like Germany? How many more Christians would be alive today in Iraq and Syria? How many fewer refugees would be pouring into Europe today from Libya, Iraq and Syria were it not for the US campaign to destabilize the region?
Check out this book:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Chosen-Admission-Exclusion-Princeton/dp/061877355X
Re: John
In the US, meritocracy created a hostile and incompetent elite that has chosen to identify with non-White minorities over the White population. Unlike aristocracy, it also reinforces the worst tendencies of American individualism by creating an elite that has no sense of obligation to the host society.
Hunter, excellent point about Vietnam! It is perhaps the primo example of expert technocrats leading us into a disaster. In fairness, if they had bothered to dirty their hands with understanding concepts such as “rules of engagement” and not handcuffing the US military (esp USAF), they might have pulled it off. But they were too smart for that.
I believe meritocracy is America at its best. But affirmative action, race-norming and quotas do not reflect a meritocracy. Perhaps too many people fear the results of an actual meritocracy? (e.g., major universities 2% Black, 4% Hispanic, 35%-40% Asian). Please don’t tell me you favor some sort of aristocracy, a la FDR?
My petition on the two gentlemens’ conduct remains pending. Please do not ape some middle level county bureaucrat. Surely, certain conduct cannot be condoned?
It’s really this simple: before the advent of meritocracy (1920s to 1950s), the US was on the ascent for the previous 150 years without the leadership of the so-called “best and the brightest.”
For the past 60 years, the US has been on a steep descent in every conceivable way. We’re now a country that is clearly on the way down under the present meritocratic elite. As Trump points out all the time, our leaders are incompetent babies who are hostile to the White population, and the meritocratic system has been the major pipeline into the American elite.
We are now governed by David Brooks’ “Bobos In Paradise.” The present elite, which is loathed by the majority of the population, was created by meritocracy. It has presided over the total collapse in confidence in virtually every mainstream institution except the military and small business.
The meritocratic elite has exported our industrial base and is turning America into a Third World country. It is difficult to imagine how our culture could be more degraded and debased than it is now.
Finally, the notion that meritocracy is some kind of superior system is absurd. Who are the great statesmen produced by the present US elite? Even in science and technology, the breakthroughs that are made today are dwarfed by the achievements of the 19th and early 20th centuries.
We’ve gone from James Blaine and Henry Cabot Lodge to John Kerry and Hillary Clinton in foreign policy. From John C. Calhoun and Daniel Webster to Harry Reid and Rand Paul in the Senate.
Millennial here from another country yet with shockingly similar circumstances. Yes, no college for me, I’m apart of the annual 13 billion dollar bill, equivalent to your 100 billion dollar bill. Suck shit to them I say. $100000 debt plus, no thanking you, far better off financially not taking on the debt of a degree. I’d rather my wife and 4 kids, with a worm farm out in hill billyville.
The baby boomers here had free college far better deal then what the USA had, though very similar. Still the baby boomers have now cemented the family legacies, along with their political ideology. Though my country isn’t suppressing the Asian’s rising in the universities, in fact it’s encouraged by $$$$$$$$, the baby boomer elite think they can share with the rich international diversity…
The Chinese cheat like buggery in the universities too,who would of thought there main influence being that of international Jewry… I can find the best seller book lists if you want Warspite.
My country is also a geopolitical swing country, we are now swinging towards China away from the USA not only with trade of resources but financially as well. Recently we’ve had our first military war exercises with the Chinese too… Hey Israel is keen to have the Chinese cannon fodder do the dirty work in the middle east too. Why not?
When the suppression becomes to great and resources diminish for the middle and lower classes of the formerly European western countries, the international diversity, along with the traitors will be the first to go. French revolution style. Serious, history rhymes in a waves of frequencies, just the characters, places and time changes.
http://www1.cuny.edu/mu/forum/2011/10/12/when-tuition-at-cuny-was-free-sort-of/
The 60’s and 70’s sound like a blast.
I believe that America was a country on the rise before meritocracy and has been a country in decline ever since it was adopted.
What are the accomplishments of the meritocratic elite compared to Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, James Polk, Henry Ford or FDR?
Why on earth should we be importing and creating an Asian overclass?
Wasn’t National Socialist Germany essentially a meritocracy?
Everyone should read “Bobos in Paradise”:
http://www.amazon.com/Bobos-In-Paradise-Upper-Class/dp/0684853787#productDescription_secondary_view_div_1445121022065
Consider it a homework assignment. These are the people who are leading the US into decline. Why on earth should we want a system that gives us leaders like John Kerry, Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama?
No, National Socialist Germany was a response to the disaster that was the Weimar Republic.
I was about to say that England has been brought to its lowest point in a thousand years under Blair, Brown, and Cameron, but I am afraid it is much worse than that.
I think the Dutch raid on the Medway fell in there.
What are you advocating? Some American aristocracy? Who? A half dozen people posting on this site have spoken against the Enlightenment or Christianity, so the people writing the Constitution aren’t your role model. Who are? The tiny elite of the antebellum South? Get real.
I appreciate that you are probably young enough to over romanticize the period, but you need to be challenged to see that period, to paraphrase Cromwell, “warts and all”.
Do you fellows know anything about Benedict Cumberbatch? The English actor? Do you know what he’s been up to? He’s actually English. Most of the so-called “English” aristocracy are Jews. Anyway – he embodies the DREGS of the last days of the English aristocracy. England is far worse off than we are…
This comment is a complete non sequitur. It actually has no meaning whatsoever. English aristocracy “Jewish”? This actor as some negative incarnation of the aforementioned aristocracy?
Can someone translate. The guy mentioned is just some actor. A very good one.
I’m sorry, Hunter, but I question your understanding of History. The persons you choose do not always fit your intended purpose. In addition, some of them would be horrified at your attempt to conjure up an American elite/aristocracy. Again, I think your ideas about the antebellum South also need further reading and maturation. You may not be entirely aware of the fact the South to which you harken includes a great element of fiction. All that stuff during the first scenes of Gone With the Wind? Fiction. There were no homes on that scale, etc., in antebellum Atlanta.
I don’t know your educational background but your reticence suggests you might have a marketing degree from UA Huntsville rather than a degree in Central European History from Duke. I also wonder if you are of the social background that might have permitted entree to the Plantation Class. You harken to a world of which your knowledge might be less than complete. For example, Hunter, can you explain why Nathaniel B. Forrest didn’t hold the position of Leonidas Polk during the Civil War?
I’m also curious about your experience in the UK. I have spent a lot of time in England & have a relative in British politics. I’ve watched & learned a lot about certain differences in British vs American society, esp regarding “class”. I don’t want to be discourteous & will only suggest you spend some time in the UK.
You’re right about the decline in American society, but I disagree about causes. I see more readily identifiable reasons. The abandonment of the “Melting Pot”, the surrender to political correctness, overemphasis on material gain, non-critical acceptance of multiculturalism and diversity as laudable ends, cynicism & lack of integrity in politics, corruption, etc.
Seeing as how the US and UK are being driven to oblivion by meritocratic elites, I propose we discard the present system of selecting our rulers.
In hindsight, what was so bad about the old system which produced political and business leaders like Andrew Jackson and Henry Ford? It wasn’t purely aristocratic or meritocratic. It worked far better than the disaster we have now and which has already lost its legitimacy.
The answer of course Hunter is ITS THE JEWS. The Jews will not be happy until humanity is largely exterminated and whites are a memory so they can rule their empty Planet Israel all to themselves. Demonic Race
That’s skirting around the question. Yes, it was a rhetorical question I asked.
German National Socialism, like it or not, was centered on a meritocratic concept, cemented with strict racial standards. A framework within a framework. Many of the negatives you are attaching to a meritocracy, you are attaching to a perversion from what meritocracy is supposed to embody. Talent and merit were central to the National Socialist system. But talent and merit have very, very little to do with how our current government is run.
You mention Henry Ford. Well, there’s a very good reason Henry Ford was admired among National Socialists. It wasn’t just his financial contributions and views on Jewry that endeared him to Nazi leadership. He was a man who transcended any kind of class struggle bullshit and rose from rural beginnings to become one of the greatest industrialist of the 20th century. He did this though his hard work, talent and merit. He did this without losing sight of the working class, and helped lift them up into more prosperity as they helped lift up his company. Ford wasn’t the smartest man. He wasn’t the most educated man. He certainly wasn’t going to win any High Society awards for his breadth of knowledge. But he was the man with the right talent and merit to make him the right man to shape an industry and bring it to the world.
Re: Celestial Time
By meritocracy, I am referring to our present system – which has existed since roughly the 1950s – where our leaders are primarily selected by their ability to score well on standardized tests and leapfrog from there into the Ivy League and from there into the highest ranks of business and government.
Nazi Germany was not a meritocracy. On the contrary, it was a reaction against Jews who had taken over huge swathes of the economy and who had become highly embedded in culturally sensitive sectors in Weimar Germany like the universities and the media. Casting the German Jews out of power and putting party loyalists like Goebbels in charge of censoring German culture was about as far from a merit based system as it gets.
Damn. I wish I could construct my message as clearly as that guy!
Following up on Celestial, I find your reference to Henry Ford interesting. An enormously powerful & influential antisemite, it was not until 1940 that Ford truly began to regret his role in spreading ideas picked up on by Nazi Germany. Viewing newsreels of concentration camps had an extremely deleterious effect on Ford’s health. His last years and a half was spent in considerable misery, torn apart by his knowledge of his contribution towards so many deaths & repeated strokes.
Ford wasn’t stupid, and he sure didn’t end up proud of what he had done. Like Celestial advised the sole female groupie around these parts, take personal responsibity for your actions.
Hunter, I just read your interpretation of the rise of Nazi Germany. That statement is stupid, ignorant and wrong. You should be ashamed of deviating so far from actual history, yet thinking you constitute some sort of belief. What is it that bars you from actually reading a few real books on history?
You telling me that Jack is your partner in this site? Why? There is no excuse for such ignorance, especially when you are so free in your criticism of “Ivy League” schools. I now question if you even know what “Ivy League” means.
Re: Warspite
1.) If you can think of a culturally lower point for England at any time in the last 1,000 years than under the leadership of schoolboys like Blair, Brown and Cameron, then I would like to hear it. The fall of the UK from the great power it was a 100 years ago into what it is today is an even more remarkable decline than what has happened in the United States since the 1950s.
2.) America has changed because the composition of the American elite has radically changed since the 1950s. The old Yankee WASP elite lost power several generations ago. The advent of the meritocratic system in the Ivy League was unquestionably one of the most important drivers of that change.
As hard as it is to believe, the downfall of the Yankee elite in Yankeeland was a blow to us in the South. The elite that has replaced the old WASPs is far worse than its predecessor.
3.) The decline of the US since the adoption of meritocracy speaks for itself. The US reached the apex of world power and influence in the Truman/Eisenhower years.
4.) If you would like to argue with me about Southern history, feel free to do so. As for military history, I have never found it interesting. We all know how the war ended. The details are unimportant.
Warspite,
1.) Why am I not surprised?
What exactly are you trying to say? Are you saying that German Jews were not grossly overrepresented in both the economy and culturally sensitive sectors of Weimar Germany?
Are you saying that Jewish influence in Weimar Germany was not vastly disproportionate to their overall numbers or that Hitler casting them out of power with authoritarian legislation was the exact opposite of a system based on individual merit?
2.) I’m sure you can point us to some great Jewish scholars who can tell us how wonderful life was in Germany during the Weimar Republic.
Are you forgetting that NS Germany was a racialist framework? You can make anything the National Socialists did seem contradicting when you stop using that as a rosetta stone when trying to make sense of their actions. Was it “fair” is a question you seem to be implying. No, it was not fair. That kind of diversity was not considered a strength to the NS, and they were not an equal opportunity employer when it came to how they defined their racial standards. It was a racialist system first and foremost. And they were most certainly meritocratic within that racialist system. Again, a framework within a framework.
How do you even gauge merit for someone who is put in charge of culture? But if you are talking about efficiency and effectiveness, then besides Hitler, Goebbels was probably the most effective person in NS leadership. Even Jewish scholars who absolutely hate the man and everything he stood for will concede that he was head and shoulders above all of his peers when it came to doing the job he was assigned to do. He was really, REALLY good at what he did—and he was hated for that. Actually, he really had no peers at that time when it came to Propaganda. That’s how far ahead of the curve Goebbels was. Inside of a closed racialist system, his appointment was about as close to a merit-based system as it exists.
As is the norm, Celestial is correct. I don’t know what a scholar being Jewish has to do with it, but there is little question about Goebbels’ genius. The guy was the real thing, a media genius with great academic bona fides. Just imagine what he would have done with TV!
I’ll spare you a person by person run down of the Nazi leadership. Schact, Speer all the way down to Hess, et. al. His being a Nazi does not effect my recognition of Goering as a man of personal courage & some ability who declined horribly, but bounced back at Nuremburg. Most of these people were multi-faceted, not cartoon characters
You’re right.
It wasn’t a system based on individual merit. The Nazis didn’t care how talented or educated the Jewish minority was in Germany. They concluded that Jewish influence had spiraled out of control and made the decision to categorically exclude Jews from German national life and later from the parts of Europe that fell under their military control.
That’s why we ended up with Freud, Marcuse and all the rest.
Part of the problem is that “meritocracy” has become a broad term.
When you start juxtaposing Meritocracy with Aristocracy, then it really does seem like you believe in antiquated things like hereditary rights(Divine Right of Kings) over any kind of merit-based system in politics and government positions. Perhaps you can elaborate on exactly what kind of government you would wish to impose.
We had all the “meritocracy” we needed in the United States. See Andrew Jackson, James Polk, Henry Ford, John C. Calhoun and countless other men who rose from humble origins. Virtually the entire country was built by such men who didn’t get there by taking standardized tests.
Oddly enough, the present “meritocratic” elite would scoff at the notion that someone as rough and uncouth as Andrew Jackson is qualified to be president. It resembles a degenerate court far more than its predecessor.
Twas only a matter of time.
The pretentious Dr.Jekyll has morphed into Mr. Hydestein.
Hunter, that’s the will to power bro.
The English aristocracy was made up of men who grabbed stuff and performed. That’s more or less the military martial elite though.
Sorta like the West Point grads. Or VMI types.
I’d applaud that sort of takeover at the moment.
The flood of Tribal interlopers in formerly Anglo institutions is not about merit. The raw numbers don’t support the connection. The tribe is nepotism practiced against the the majority and their upper classes.
Marx was just the intellectual end of the Tribal wedge.
The Nazis themselves explained the scale of Jewish influence in Weimar Germany and why they believed their actions were justified:
http://www.amazon.com/Jewish-Domination-Weimar-Germany-Eckhart/dp/1492991961
I remember reading this book by Werner Sombart on the Jewish spirit of capitalism while in college:
https://books.google.com/books?id=P33VHF1aBAcC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=jews+sombart+percent&source=bl&ots=GnCqDazCm6&sig=IObtjwqbbHCP_OBg_MmHunG0eL8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCcQ6AEwBGoVChMI1uultIjLyAIVjKuACh00Tw4R#v=onepage&q=jews%20sombart%20percent&f=false
US of WG
Untied States of Weimars Ghost
Seems an applicable acronym.
It is a sad state of affairs.
Thanks for the book recommendations Hunter, I think I’ll buy them for myself and share it with the old man.
Goebbels was actually a remarkably talented man.
The Jewish notion was that the Nazi hierarchy was mediocre and their lackies in the universities even less talented.
They had a pretty good run against two of the world’s largest empires and the US.
They punched well above their weight.
Interesting points.
A true aristocracy is defined by heroic deed. That’s a form of merit.
For example you have military academy grads from West Point, VMI and Sandhurst or St Cyr. These people are men of enormous merit. Especially after triumphs.
Perhaps a definition of Meritocracy and Aristocracy is needed. If you have a bureaucratic machine run by a cognitive elite and lead by men of action and great deeds (Jackson can be included) then things work. Maybe the Monarch/Executive should not have a fucking law degree for a start. Nor should he go to Harvard or Yale.
Just like the good ol’ USA.
Yogi Berra: “It’s like déjà vu all over again.”
Jewish Domination of Weimar Germany
‘Using official pre-Nazi-era demographics, this work showed that Jews were massively over-represented in all fields of German social and economic life—except that of farming and creative work.
It lists the ownership of mass media in Weimar Germany, the astonishing financial scandals, Communism and political subversion, degenerate theater, sexual psychology, Communist indoctrination in educational institutions and the media—all of which was predominantly Jewish in origin.’
Eckhart is a real revelation. Is it PDF format anywhere? Saw it two years ago. Absolutely astonishing stats that are remarkably similar to contemporary America and UK.
Captain John Charity Spring MA
‘Eckhart is a real revelation. Is it PDF format anywhere?’
Several formats
https://archive.org/details/JewishDominationOfWeimarGermany1919-1932
Benedict Cumberbatch is heir to an extremely well-connected family. He hails from the Upper Classes. The “aristocracy” A tradiotnal Aristocrat does derive from merit – heroic deed, as Captain John so accurately pointed out. The Aristocratic class, in any society, is enjoined to manage manage and protect the underlings.
Cumberbatch is not fulfilling his social duties as a protector of England. Instead – he’s a Pretend Person. An actor. (The Romans regarded actors as the DREGS of society – worse than prostitutes). He did not elicit any particular notice in his Twenties, but became a star in his early Thirties, after being cast as the most Iconic English character in literature, the detective “Sherlock Holmes” in the HeeBeeC update “Sherlock”. This show is the BIGGEST thing on UK TV – so it has cultural influence and “pull”.
Cumberbatch has just had a really spectacular hit in a really weird, degenerate, childish version of Shakespeare’ masterpiece “Hamlet”, aat the Barbican Theater. The run was completely sold out; it’s the first time it’ ever happened at this particular theater, all due to Cumberbatch’s appearance in the title role.
Cumberbatch was never particularly political until very recently. He’s begun pimping for Open Borders, and has just made a series of video ads, begging his own Nation to “do more” for the “Syrian refugees”. We know, and most of the world knows,that these “poor widdle refugees” are 90% military aged males, and most are ot from Syria. They are Africans and Arabs – and have invaded Europe. BC seems to be wholly oblivious to this reality. He’s enjoyed immense good will, since he became a star, but he’s incurred rightful criticism and disdain for his active support for the Islamic invasion of the UK. He took to demanding MONEY from his audience, at the end of each performance of “Hamlet”, in order to support the invasion of England, and the theater stationed ushers and other employees, at exits, armed with red buckets (the color signified the Tories) which they shook at exiting play-goers, literally attempting to shake the audience down for money.
Benedict Cumberbatch, Flower of the Anglo Saxon elite, or what’s left of ’em, has noeve utter ONE WORD of sympathy or support, nor shed one salt tear, for the THOUSANDS of little White English girls, raped, beaten, abused, pimped, and murdered by the VILE Paki Rape Beast vermin, infecting all of England.
He embodies all the treason and evil and depravity of the remnants of the Ruling Elite. He should be hanging from a post on the London Bridge, til his flesh falls off his bones, and into the Thames.
Captain John Charity Spring MA // October 18, 2015 at 3:08 am //
“The English aristocracy was made up of men who grabbed stuff and performed. That’s more or less the military martial elite though.
Sorta like the West Point grads. Or VMI types.
I’d applaud that sort of takeover at the moment.”
That’s a good point. Military men are practical, if they aren’t they die. Priests and scholars don’t have to deal with reality, so they live in their fantasy worlds. I think that’s what is at the heart of the collapse of the West. We’re ruled by priests and scholars.
I now recognize Hunter for what he is. An SAE @ Southern Miss or Furman who can’t understand why the Jewish kid in class gets higher grades (hint: he studied & is now a CPA).
There is nothing becoming about Hunter’s anti-intellectual approach. It’s derisiveness towards higher culture and incredible need for mediocrity is frightening. You know little about the American South other than reading one side of an issue. Rejecting analysis based on anything other than a single point of view that mimics yours is not an intelligent, analytical approach.
The mediocrity of your analyses is stunning, as is your false sense of honor. Again, you mimic someone like Lee, but you fail to understand “why” he was the man you purport to admire. It’s really galling you would reference someone like Jefferson, who would consider you not worth a conversation. Ditto Madison, Washington, et. al.
I mean, can anyone even conceive of someone like Jefferson having anything but abhorrence about Nazi Germany!
Those mediocre goyim!
That always makes me laugh regards the Third Reich. A nation of mediocrity! That romper stompered to within an ace of world domination…Oy.
If you look at the educational biographies of the political leadership, rather than the judiciary, Yale and or Harvard attendance was rarer.
With the Presidency? Must Have candidate attending the big two only really came along with Bush I. Then Clinton, then Bush then Obama. Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon were much more diverse in terms of educational background. Kennedy was a Harvard grad, Eisenhower was West Point, Truman? Where did he go?
The Executive shouldn’t require a JD or diploma from H or Y.
1.) As everyone here knows, I went to Auburn.
2.) Are you disputing that Jews were massively overrepresented in the economy and culture of Weimar Germany or that Hitler and the Nazis resented their power and influence in German society? Didn’t think so. I don’t know of anyone who disputes that. They only cry “anti-Semitism.”
3.) Everyone behold the achievements of Jewish high culture and popular culture in 20th and 21st century America. Who could ever object to that? Only a rube who hasn’t read the greats like Franz Boas, Ayn Rand, Sigmund Freud, Howard Zinn, Herbert Marcuse, Ashley Montagu, Stephen Jay Gould, etc.
4.) Feel free to engage me on Southern history. We will see who knows little about the subject.
5.) I’m not sure how long you have been reading this blog, but we have never uncritically celebrated the “Founding Fathers” here. As for James Madison in particular, he shares much of the credit for the greatest folly in our history.
Would he also abhor what has transpired in North America over the last half century? I think any ripple of disgust he would feel toward Nazi Germany would be dwarfed a thousand times over when compared to the tsunami of hate he would have for this rotting corpse of a nation we are living in today.
What exactly would Jefferson like about America today?
– Monetary servitude to banks and international finance, and a life of debt slavery for our kids?
– A black population that is responsible for epidemic levels of violence?
– Constant media manipulations that cover up that black violence and, in turn, try to blame, demonize and remove the White Western roots of this country?
– Anti-White propaganda bursting at the seams from Hollywood and every other segment of society?
– Pervasive federal government that grows every year, while only managing to grow the national debt and attempting to take more freedoms away from law-abiding citizens?
– Rampant political correctness?
– Flaming homosexuals parading around and trying to use our education system to “inform” children about the hidden homosexual they are repressing inside of them?
– Gay marriage, homosexual adoptions and “heroic” trannies on the cover of magazines?
– National borders that are pretty much open to non-Whites in a not-so-secretive agenda to remove the White majority?
– Outsourcing of practically our entire industrial base?
– Free healthcare for illegals and deadbeats, while hard-working legal citizens are left footing the bill?
There are literally thousands of things I could name. I have no doubt if Jefferson were to be given the option of living in Nazi Germany and this thing called Multicultural/Multiracial America, he would run straight into the arms of Hitler and never look back. Frankly, at this point, so would I.
Jefferson would take a look at the top of the American social pyramid and discern the cause.
Why aren’t we educating more White American medical doctors and nurses? That would be an area that the federal government should & would want to pump up, but, won’t. Rather federal policy will be to import 3rd world doctors & nurses.
Paul Theroux talks about it at length in “Deep South.”
I would love to engage Hunter on his issues, but first he needs to flex a little of that “honor” he thinks he understands. Then we can get to his ideas.
The Southern Miss guess was wrong, I should have gone with Miss State. I have nothing against the second best college in Alabama, and still see him the same way. Envying Jews getting better grades, rooting on Bo Jackson despite…, speaking of Stanford, Chicago and Colombia as populated by Communist Jews who nonetheless murder gentile children to make Passover matzah
Warspite has played his final card here.
Why do you follow a non-Jews around and attempt to sit in judgment? I have some sympathy for Kafka’s strange Joseph K. On trial for some ill defined crime that he can’t quite figure out. Perhaps Kafka’s famous alienation from Himself and Jewery was a manifestation of having to deal with psychotic stalky relatives like Warspite.
1.) Does anyone see Warspite engaging me on the issues? Has anyone seen him make a positive case for Jewish influence in 20th and 21st century America? I’m guessing that 99 percent of our readers would say that the Jewish elite has had an overwhelmingly negative impact and should not be retained in any future separatist state.
2.) We’re patiently waiting to hear the case for why it is in our interest to be ruled by a hostile overclass of Jewish and Asian boys who make good grades in Ivy League universities.
3.) Perhaps we could start by citing the work of all those pro-Southern and pro-White Jewish scholars – maybe we could begin with Eric Foner – who have risen through the meritocratic system?
Warspite is so much smarter than the rest of us. He should have no problem making the case for so many brilliant Jews.
A better question would be, why aren’t we[pro-Whites] fostering an environment where Whites with the right amount of talent, ambition and drive are pushed into professions and trades and helped along the way to ensure they aren’t sidetracked and railroaded?
I know why “they” don’t wan’t to create a smoother path for Whites. I just don’t understand why pro-Whites don’t want to take up the slack. The apathy and uncreative atmosphere surrounding the pro-White world is almost as much of a hindrance as are the anti-White institutions and policies that are in place.
Let’s look at the mediocrity called TS Eliot.
During a 1933 lecture in Virginia, published in 1934 as “After Strange Gods,” (which he later refused to reprint) Eliot, following Maurras, stressed the importance of social “unity of religious background. . . . Reasons of race and religion combine to make any large number of free-thinking Jews undesirable,” Hmmmmm…what could he have meant?