Paul Ryan’s Poll Numbers Crash

Amazing how that happens:

More to that effect here.

It almost looks like Trump’s recent attacks on Paul Ryan have tremendously damaged his image with Trump’s supporters in the Republican Party.

Now, what if the opposite is true: what if six months of attacks from the #NeverTrump camp and the likes of Kasich, Ryan and ¡Jeb!, not to mention the “conservative” intellectuals, have hurt Trump with the establishment wing of the Republican Party? What if they have poisoned Trump’s image with that 25 percent of Republican Party?

The establishment wing wasn’t strong enough to win the primary, but the cucks are strong enough to throw the election to Hillary. It would be like 25 percent of a football team tackling their own quarterback, forcing a turnover, and allowing the opposing team to take the ball to the endzone. Would you call that sabotage?

Trump’s sabotage of Paul Ryan illustrates how #NeverTrump’s sabotage has been affecting the presidential race. Oh, but they will say, it wasn’t us!

About Hunter Wallace 12381 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

14 Comments

  1. In the book,”they dare to speak out”people and institutions confront Israel’s lobby. Paul Findley 1985.
    You see all the senators and congressman who sold out to aipac when they were baby’s asses like Paul Ryan,there mostly the old guys in their now.

  2. The latest from Braman’s bitch Marco Rubio. Marco Rubio Warns GOP On WikiLeaks: ‘Tomorrow, It Could Be Us’ · Marco does not want his Zionist master’s agenda to be widely known.

    “The best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad. Negotiations to limit Iran’s nuclear program will not solve Israel’s security dilemma. Nor will they stop Iran from improving the crucial part of any nuclear weapons program — the capability to enrich uranium. At best, the talks between the world’s major powers and Iran that began in Istanbul this April and will continue in Baghdad in May will enable Israel to postpone by a few months a decision whether to launch an attack on Iran that could provoke a major Mideast war.

    Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war may seem unconnected, but they are. For Israeli leaders, the real threat from a nuclear-armed Iran is not the prospect of an insane Iranian leader launching an unprovoked Iranian nuclear attack on Israel that would lead to the annihilation of both countries. What Israeli military leaders really worry about — but cannot talk about — is losing their nuclear monopoly. An Iranian nuclear weapons capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go nuclear as well.

    The result would be a precarious nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today. If Iran were to reach the threshold of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, knowing that its nuclear weapons would serve as a deterrent to Israel responding against Iran itself. Back to Syria. It is the strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security — not through a direct attack, which in the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel has never occurred, but through its proxies in Lebanon, like Hezbollah, that are sustained, armed and trained by Iran via Syria. The end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel’s leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its interests.

    Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly. Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted. Right now, it is the combination of Iran’s strategic alliance with Syria and the steady progress in Iran’s nuclear enrichment program that has led Israeli leaders to contemplate a surprise attack — if necessary over the objections of Washington. With Assad gone, and Iran no longer able to threaten Israel through its, proxies, it is possible that the United States and Israel can agree on red lines for when Iran’s program has crossed an unacceptable threshold. “

    • In the end WWIII will be waged on behalf of Israel, that shitty little country in the ME, created out of Palestinian genocide and US complicity. If it doesn’t start before election day Trump is the only reasonable alternative to Armageddon.

      • How do you square that with his attitude on Iran,he’s still doing what the isre lies want him to,and lies about the assets froze by the US being returned to Iran,I believe.
        I don’t like that about him.I know he’s better then hillery,but I still fear that guy.

  3. Didn’t Century for a New America- or whatever the group is called, have a list of nations they wanted to topple one by one? I forget the name of all the nations but I think Iran, Syria, and Libya were on it. Notice regardless of which party is in power they have not deviated from this list.

  4. Paul Ryan needs to give his “I hate Pepe” speech I would contribute money to him then out of the goodness of my heart.

  5. I never liked Paul Ryan anyway. By the way, I loved the Spanish language reference to !Jeb! (Not sure how to filp an exclamation point on my keyboard, but you know what I mean).
    I just posted an essay on my WordPress blog “Putnam Liberty Notes” on the basics of shotguns and selecting a personal and home defense load -with some pattern tests and photos. Check it out, you and you friends and family might need to know this as stuff America degrades.

Comments are closed.