Trump’s Picks: Robert Lighthizer for US Trade Representative

It is a relief to have some good news to report for a change:

“President-elect Donald Trump, who made criticism of foreign trade deals a major theme of his presidential campaign, said Tuesday he has nominated former Reagan administration official Robert Lighthizer to be his new U.S. trade representative.

Lighthizer “has extensive experience striking agreements that protect some of the most important sectors of our economy, and has repeatedly fought in the private sector to prevent bad deals from hurting Americans,” Trump said in a statement. “He will do an amazing job helping turn around the failed trade policies which have robbed so many Americans of prosperity.” …”

As with Peter Navarro, Robert Lighthizer has a strong record on trade issues:

“With Donald Trump getting more TV coverage than Charlie Sheen and rising in the polls among Republicans, it is not a surprise that the knives have come out for him. “He’s just another liberal,” screams the libertarian Club for Growth. “He’s not one of us,” echoes Karl Rove.

All of that may be true, but one piece of cited evidence is quite puzzling. Mr. Trump’s GOP opponents accuse him of wanting to get tough on China and of being a protectionist. Since when does that mean one is not a conservative? For most of its 157-year history, the Republican Party has been the party of building domestic industry by using trade policy to promote U.S. exports and fend off unfairly traded imports. American conservatives have had that view for even longer. …

When viewed in this context, the recent blind faith some Republicans have shown toward free trade actually represents more of an aberration than a hallmark of true American conservatism. It’s an anomaly that may well demand re-examination in the context of critically important questions facing all conservatives on trade policy.

Given the current financial crisis and the widespread belief that the 21st century will belong to China, is free trade really making global markets more efficient? Is it promoting our values and making America stronger? Or is it simply strengthening our adversaries and creating a world where countries who abuse the system – such as China – are on the road to economic and military dominance? If Mr. Trump’s potential campaign does nothing more than force a real debate on those questions, it will have done a service to both the Republican Party and the country.”

This is another pick I support.

At least on the trade front, Wilbur Ross (Commerce), Peter Navarro (Trade Czar) and Robert Lighthizer (US Trade Representative) will likely end up being a strong likeminded team. This will come as a surprise to many of Trump’s critics on the Left who dismissed Trump’s rhetoric on free-trade during the campaign.

There’s always a catch though … in this case, the catch is the Republican Congress:

“Among the first steps being floated by the incoming Trump administration is a 5 to 10 percent tariff on imports, implemented through an executive order. It’s the sort of shoot-first, ask-questions-later action that President-elect Donald J. Trump promised during the campaign. It’s also unconstitutional.

That’s because the path to imposing tariffs — along with taxes and other revenue-generating measures — clearly begins with Congress, and in particular the House, through the Origination Clause. When presidents have raised (or lowered) tariffs in the past, they have tended to do so using explicit, if sometimes wide-ranging, authority from Congress. …

Of course, Mr. Trump doesn’t have to act unilaterally; he has Republican majorities in both chambers that are eager to work with him. One option would be to push for a border adjustment tax, a proposal already being floated in the House as part of comprehensive tax reform, which would forbid tax deductions for imports and exempt exports from taxes. …”

Three questions:

1.) Is the Republican Congress going to pass a small, symbolic tariff – something like a 5 percent tariff on imports, which Reince has floated – which would have no real impact on the economy or relations with China but would be a face saving token gesture to Trump’s base?

2.) Is the Republican Congress going to pass the Paul Ryan agenda and have Trump rubber stamp a bunch of policies that conservative think tanks cooked up years ago? Trump and Ryan want to cut taxes, but Ryan and McConnell oppose Trump on tariffs. Does that mean we get the big corporate tax cut, but not the tariff?

3.) Is this something Trump can do on his own authority with an executive order? I’ve seen that idea floated around the internet, but history suggests otherwise.

About Hunter Wallace 12387 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent


  1. There are laws against “dumping” (selling below cost) where the President can unilaterally impose tariffs. It might take some legal stretch (like adding up subsidies, worker abuse, environmental costs unpaid like the toxic smog in China).

  2. The one positive thing we must always remember about Trump. He is not a lawyer and that is a very, very good thing indeed.

  3. Ford will build a plant in Michigan instead of Mexico as a “vote of confidence” in President-elect Donald J. Trump’s incoming administration, its CEO Mark Fields announced on Tuesday.
    The announcement means Ford will cancel its plans to build a new plant in Mexico and will instead invest $700 million in Michigan—creating 700 new jobs here in the United States—CNN reports.

  4. Donald J. Trump ?@realDonaldTrump 6h6 hours ago
    General Motors is sending Mexican made model of Chevy Cruze to U.S. car dealers-tax free across border. Make in U.S.A.or pay big border tax!

  5. I learnt this when I worked for Fisher Controls. In Mexico, by law, any foreign country that sells on the Mexican market, must do 25% of the production/assembly in Mexico. That’s why VW and other companies have assembly plants there.

  6. How many times have many of us stated that the Trump win is ONLY the BEGINNING?
    We do not EVER let up.
    We do not go away.
    THAT is what we DO.

  7. What exactly is wrong with being “protectionist”? Protecting American jobs and industries is what the President and Congress ought to do, no?

  8. The best case scenario is that Trump on this issue is actually sincere, but will face stiff opposition in congress.’

    The worst case scenario is that Trump has made a calculation that congress will stop him, so he’s pretending to champion a cause that he is certain is doomed to failure.

    Either way the solution lies outside the system.

  9. Just hoping Lighthizer pursues the following:

    No trade with the Vietnamese at all—ZERO—until they rename that city Saigon and tear down every public statue of its present eponym.

  10. I think all Trump needs to do is remind the congress critters that the mid-terms are 24 short months away and that he can and will condemn them to their constituencies if they don’t get with the fucking program.

Comments are closed.