There are radicals who would like to stamp out Christian liberty. But the Valyrian steel that stops the cultural white walker is pluralism buttressed by classical liberalism, not Christian statism. (Analogy makes sense in the piece): https://t.co/QECVdwBepZ— David French (@DavidAFrench) May 30, 2019
BREAKING: YOUTUBE/GOOGLE HAS REMOVED OUR GOOGLE INVESTIGATION as it was approaching 50K likes and a million views. IMPORTANT: Please download it on @bitchute and repost it. https://t.co/chDsGF0QCk— James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) June 25, 2019
*unsheathes the Valyrian steel sword of pluralism buttressed by classical liberalism*
YouTube took us down for exposing the most powerful company in the history of the world. “Without fear or favor?” Most journalists are afraid or on the take so they’re rendered mute. But people are uploading clips en masse. Here’s Google exec on her contempt of Congress and 2020. pic.twitter.com/q6E67CmbKH— James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) June 25, 2019
“@ewarren is saying we should break up @Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided . . . all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.” pic.twitter.com/5GflPP6uHD— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) June 24, 2019
A Google insider walked us through an example (Hillary emails) of how “algorithmic unfairness” is combated through “re-biasing” search results. Watch the video below, and the full video on our site: https://t.co/w984oFqK4Y pic.twitter.com/PEmKAnlEYX— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) June 24, 2019
NEW: GOOGLE INSIDER: Google “is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.” Watch the full video — https://t.co/wEQlqHHUEt pic.twitter.com/7erjHoaU5C— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) June 24, 2019
Google’s YouTube uses AI to downrank content based on words and phrases used during videos deemed “right-wing”. This is partisan manipulation and ultimately election meddling. pic.twitter.com/V5IS9zBfoX— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) June 24, 2019
Powerful revelations from ?@Project_Veritas? – please watch and share! pic.twitter.com/FBehIYWajs— Stefan Molyneux (@StefanMolyneux) June 24, 2019
According to David French, the problem isn’t Google, YouTube and Facebook censorship. It is Sen. Josh Hawley and people complaining about being purged from the national political conversation by Big Tech. The gubmint is the problem and the free-market is the solution!
The Open AI project is supposedly going nowhere, because women and minorities were exclusively chosen to work on it. But algorithms (not quite the same as AI) on the net seem to effectively filter out dissident viewpoints, so at least some talented white guys must be part of that bit of successful totalitarian censorship.
If we had a hundredth the clarity of purpose as the Enemy, this would already be over (or never would have happened).
As it stands, this movement is still trying to “take back America” in the form of fighting to get this government to stand up for us. It is NEVER going to happen.
Digital separation en route to political and physical separation is the way to go. Are we Rosa Parks trying to ride the same bus? Or do we want our own SEPARATE bus?
It’s tragic and tiresome.
Who’s trying to take back Weimerica? I’m all for positive accelerationism and informal separation. (Brazenly open separation can only occur, imho, once the central gov’t is so weakened it can’t enforce its rule.) I haven’t noticed anyone here showing faith in government, actually. Even pro-UBI people like me speak of that idea as a defense against the elites.
David French is the Problem. He is a traitor, and a fifth columnist for the Deicides.
Why does David French even speak? Is it only to make the air move?
What will Blompf’s and the GOP’s reaction be to Google’s ML algorithm? Monitoring it closely or business as usual?