Affirmative action is next on the chopping block.
“Following the Supreme Court’s leak of a draft decision overturning Roe v. Wade, many Court-watchers and pundits have pointed to same-sex marriage and access to contraceptives as rights now potentially at risk. And while in the long run the logic set forth in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization could undermine those precedents, the Court may eviscerate other major areas of law far sooner—in fact, with cases on its docket this current term. Notably, the Court may soon declare the use of race in college admissions—affirmative action—illegal, and it may also massively constrain the power of the federal government to protect the environment.
The questions at hand in each case—Dobbs, Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, and West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency—differ. But they all raise issues that have been the targets of conservative legal scholars for decades, and they will now be decided by a right-wing Court with seemingly little commitment to its own precedents.
The use of race in admissions has been permissible in the eyes of the Court since 1978, when Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. delivered his opinion in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke.Allan Bakke, who was white, argued that he had been denied entry into UC Davis’s medical school because of its affirmative-action program, which reserved 16 of the 100 seats in each class for minority students—though the school contended that his age (35) and average test scores had more to do with his rejection. Powell ruled that race could be used in admissions in concert with a host of other factors—including grades, extracurricular activities, and test scores—to build a class, because diversity was an important interest of the state’s. As such, his decision was not about righting historical wrongs, but about diversity for the benefit of the entire campus community. Over the next 40 years, the decision was upheld time and again. …”
Gayway Pundit just did a really evil hit piece on Anglin and Weev and the dissident right in general. The Orcs are mobilizing.
I saw
Gay Jim Hoft with the barely legal Filipino boy toy needs to learn about the pot & kettle, lol.
He & Anglin like the same race of whores and neither will ever procreate.
https://altrightexposedblog.wordpress.com/2022/05/20/alt-right-incels-at-deep-state-daily-stormer-site-celebrate-buffalo-shooting-call-for-more-attacks-right-in-time-for-the-mid-terms/
>The site is now only accessible on the Tor network
it’s here:
http://stormer-daily.rw/
Mr. Wallace and/or KT-88, I have a sincere question. What was false in that article on the gateway pundit. I just read it. What did they say that was factually false, especially about weev, who is jewish, or at least partially jewish.
I didn’t see anything in the article that surprised me. I didn’t know Weev was celebrating the Buffalo shooter, but that is what I would expect
Weev celebrating the murders in Buffalo is not supported by any statements.
Also, Weev’s sentence/conviction was vacated. He spent over a year in solitary for NOTHING. This was the first recent James Fields type ethnic lawfare. They bulldozed his home as retribution just like a Palestinian to boot. Weev might be crazy but he is not evil.
Here it is on GWP:
Alt-Right Incels at Deep State “Daily Stormer” Site Celebrate Buffalo Shooting – Call for More Attacks
Does anyone know who’s behind Alt-Right Exposed? — it seems fairly juvenile, so I’m not surprised the GWP, one of the looniest conserva-/Trump-tard sites out there (the comments are worse) was interested in re-publishing it.
Right on cue, the Deep State “Alt Right” movement has been activated in order to conflate President Trump and Republicans with racism, and hatred of women, ahead of the mid term elections.
They are also conspiracy-tards:
“Weev” and Andrew Anglin registered the “Daily Stormer” in Russia, in order to conflate Trump and conservatism with Russia, during the 2016 election.
Of course we’re all supposed to overlook the fact Jim Hoft is a disgusting faggot who brought a child husband here from the Philippines.
Of course these are all evils that the SCOTUS may be limiting, which is good. But the reason for setting new limits on sin is likely to be fascist preparation for war, getting the population disciplined on a war footing.
We conservatives have a reputation for grousing about our leaders’ letting us down, (and Donald Trump let us down countless times). But let’s admit that Trump’s nominating Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett to the SCOTUS has worked out well for us in this.
It’s all theater. Don’t be fooled.
Don’t count your chickens before they’re hatched. It has the odor of Repuke Kabuki smoke which invariably ends up as an exploding cigar.
The target? Legislating from the bench
Even if the SC overturned the 1978 ruling would it really stop race base admissions in favor of minorities or would the universities and govt find other ways around it?
Universities are done. 20% inflation and all the state schools are bankrupt.
“seemingly little commitment to its own precedents.” Heh, the whole last several decades saw the court carrying very little about “precedent”. Thats why we have so much dispute about much of the civil rights laws we have. Because, exactly, they had “seemingly little commitment to its own precedents.” So many of the press acts like history started in the late 20th century.
Birthright citizenship is what needs to be on the chopping block.
I have a problem with the gateway Pundit. As I understand, its editor is homosexual, and he adopted a filipino boy, and got him past immigration rules to ‘be his companion.’ After that, I really didn’t listen to much the pundit says on anything.
I do read daily stormer, but also take a lot of it with a grain of salt. Anglin is funny, has some shrewd observations, and I have seen what he’d says is outrageous or disgusting becomes, after a few months, a verified fact.
I admit that many of these sites are infiltrated by feds and a lot of worms sent in to create internal dissent. as for ‘false information,’ it’s really hard to say what is true or false anymore. In the1991 novel Serpent’s Walk, by Randolph Calverhall, a disaster allows the right to take power, but in the end its pro-American nationalist president seems disoriented and lost. it turns out he is a holograph used to keep the electorate unaware of a coup. Could we say that Biden isn’t some kind of holograph? I’m not throwing out any theories, just that this system is incapable of any honesty. it lies and disseminates simply that’s because it can’t do anything else.
You can see why, in the end, when the Huns broke into Rome, there might have been more than a few Romans happy to see them, compared to what the imperial system had become. In the end, Rome ws much more damaged by civil war from ts own rotten factions than from the barbarians.
I always supported Harold Covington, although I understand he had a lot of baggage, but he said some very truthful things. In the end, we’re stuck with the truth-tellers we have.
DESPERATE TO DISCRIMINATE: Elite schools search for new ways to ‘diversify’ as SCOTUS decision on affirmative action looms — While affirmative action could potentially face the chopping block, universities have stressed their commitment to diversity in their admissions
With a potential ruling in the Supreme Court regarding affirmative action looming, the possibility of it being overturned has elite college campuses struggling to figure out how to stick to their “diversity” efforts without being able to factor in race. … “Regardless of the court’s decision, we will continue to advance our diversity, equity, and inclusion goals,” said Anthony Monaco, president of Tufts University. “Diversity is vital to creating a climate that encourages learning both in and outside of the classroom, fosters respectful conversations across differences, and provides all our students with transformational experiences.”
Note the glib assertions about the value of ‘diversity’, with zero evidence to support them — it’s a kind of religious dogma.
As I said before, with the sheer amount of admitting and hiring that goes on, it will nearly impossible to enforce a ban on affirmative action, no matter how precisely that is defined — re university admissions, not using standard test scores like the SAT and ACT will make it even harder — so more selective schools may decide to stop using them.