They do it in Southern states! The GOP has always been an anti-white party, and it still is. The GOP and their media surrogates have the descendants of Confederate soldiers shitting on their own ancestors in order to own Dems. it’s pathetic.
— ThunderStruck ? (@StrukkThunder) September 2, 2024
Is the GOP an anti-White party?
I would say it is complicated. It is the party of White conservatives. I think of White conservatives as moderates, White Nationalists as radicals and White liberals as anti-White.
White conservatives have a relatively normal level of racial in-group preference. They have generally positive feelings about their own race, but they are not extremely ethnocentric. This is a different sensibility from White liberals who are outright hostile to their own race.
The two parties are highly sorted by ideology.
Liberal Whites are Democrats. Conservative Whites are Republicans. These two groups also have very different attitudes about their own race. It is an exaggeration to say there is no difference.
White Republicans will give different answers on immigration, white privilege, diversity, the Great Replacement, anti-White discrimination, etc. They are racially tolerant and approve of miscegenation. They generally like immigrants. They are not ideological racial nationalists. Most will say that the decline of Whites isn’t important, but a large and growing minority disagrees.
White evangelical Protestants are driving the difference.
Whites in Alabama and Tennessee do not produce governments like Whites in Vermont and Minnesota.
I don’t believe the WWE isn’t scripted, but I’m not a TV watcher.
The GOP just uses WHITES and then tosses them aside.
Just as the Dems do with “minorities”. The political class is mainly just a bunch of self-serving whores.
Kumala is taking thunder that Trump should have taken, she’s going to oppose the Nippon Steel takeover of US Steel.
Trump is dumb.
Silly question.
Of course, the retardicans/GOP are anti-White. Their record and pandering to every other demographic and special interest group makes that point. They only mention Whites dying due to the (((opioid crisis))) during election time and ignore it thereafter.
Their rhetoric of replacing “Karens” with Jamals and Juans is 100% anti-White.
Lest we forget, the GOP has done nothing about the browning of America.
HW,
I do not believe you should conflate GOP voter’s POVs with the republican party.
There was a study released a few years ago that found that the political parties ignore the wishes of their majority of their voters.
I have somewhat different experiences over time than what this polling shows. For example, I know White liberals in California who are either passively pro-White or anti-anti-White in private. However, they triangulate against public pro-White statements made by other Whites. In private they are far more nuanced. Socially, they very rarely interact with non-Whites. This might be related to age as most grew up in an era of White California and remember how it was, yet still live there. Perhaps its a form of passive private resistance and public acceptance like most of the French during Nazi occupation. Its why the Republicans among them are often called Vichy Republicans to this day in the GOP.
As to myscegenation, I’ve known many White liberal Californians privately shame it, especially Vichy Republicans. I am not certain on all of their religious identities but I’d say the majority who were like this were Protestants. Similarly, I know even fewer Republicans across the country who celebrate myscegenation. Most are like “Eew, gross.” At most what they accept is mysceganation with Hispanics.
My second marriage was to a very pretty and sexy Caztico. My very racially aware family and friends were mostly cool with it, as were my California friends. Unlike my first wife who was a Sicilian-Irish Papist, she was Protestant and came from a long time Southern family on one side of her family, so maybe that is why it was workable acceptable. She actually was also quiet racially aware and even became well acquainted with the JQ. Also, fellow Republicans couldn’t really tell her non-White background so it never came up but once with a long time Republican stalwart woman. Regardless we had no kids and separated and I am glad for it, as despite the similarities, the ethnic differences were too wide. Proof enough despite the fun.
My experience with Southerners showed much more willingness to discuss racial matters. Interestingly, they also engaged with non-Whites more than my Californian friends. Yet, they were definitely Pro-White and unashamedly so. I knew only one Papist from the South. Not surprisingly, he happened to be the only one of my Southern colleagues who liked to hang out and socialize with non-Whites, go to their clubs, wear their weird voodoo stuff, and mysceginate with them. It took a proper Southern Protestant Christian girl to fix him, set him straight, and eventually marry him. He was not allowed to invite any of his Black and Mexican friends to their wedding, she and her Southern Protestant family wouldn’t allow it.
My experience with Northerners ran the gamut. There is much more division between various ethnicities. In the Northeast especially, I saw a quiet and unspoken division between White Protestant and White Papists. They would socialize often but carefully stepped away from anything that might bring up controversy. The Protestants were definitively against myscegenation but only in private. The Papists, especially, the working class ones, were unashamedly anti-non-White. Ironically, they would then go hang out periodically with non-Whites and even marry them. I call this the Braziliazization of the Papist North East. In contrast, the Protestants were very closed to interacting with non-Whites, who they saw mostly as an alien species. This was less so among the working class ones, but there were precious few Prods who were working class to begin with in that region.
Overall, as to the GOPers supporting myscegenation, I think those answering favorably to it, is more an example of public virtue signaling. Its also ethno-sectarian driven, principally among Papists and Midwesterners and Pacific coastal areas. In general, except for the Papists in the GOP, I see very little private support for it. Where I did see a public and private support for it the most was in Midwestern Northerners both Papist and Protestants.
Here, both Papists and Protestants seem to eagerly embrace pro-mysceganation policy going so far as to celebrate it amongst their friends when it happens whilst privately not dealing in it. This is typical Midwestern two faced fackery which the region is notorious for being. Its in this area where the tilt to majority GOPers supporting myscegnation is likely happening the most.
Clearly the poll shows Republicans leaning on most issues to pro-White, pro-Christian, pro-Nationalist identities. There are weak areas, such as myscegenation, which in my anecdotal experiences as explained is mostly derived from ethno-sectarian differences. Meanwhile, the ethno-sectarian Protestant Republicans across the country, except for the Midwest are mostly opposed myscegenation in private and public discussions. I estimate where the tilt happens is among the Papists, Midwesterners, and possibly among the Coastal White Republican populations, mostly in the Pacific. Overall, its shrinking as the facts of multiracial life rear its ugly head straight to their faces.
As to the Southern Republican leaders defecating on Southern heroes and heritage, this is mostly due to donor driven pressure and lack of Southernerns organizing at the grass roots level to counter act it. The latter is clearly the result of laziness on the part of the common folk, and less on the part of indifference. But, if the Southerners (British American Colonial Settlers) don’t start organizing at the grass roots level on their racial, national, and ethnic identity and holding their elected leaders responsible in defending it, they will have allowed their lands to look like the NorthEast, essentially urban, Papist, mysceganated, and ugly.
Even for a jew you have an extremely overactive imagination.
Though their base might not be, The Republican Party is thoroughly anti-white, just slightly less so than the D-jerseys. One doesn’t even need to look very hard to find an example – from the über-Repuke Senate Majority “leader”. The Gay Old Pedoburo just follows the Donkeyshits like a perverted shadow on the road to hell. Once again, old. Rev. Dabney saw it all coming. Hope ‘Cocaine Mitch’ gets to join the accordion band down-under soon. Not that it will matter as they’re will always be another disgusting POS (Lady G?) to replace the scum.
From “Toma Hawk” on Telegram.
Where is the lie?
“Remember, Kamala has already publicly disrespected Tim Walz for being White, to his face, on television.
Does the Republican party seize that opportunity to say to their voters, “Do you want a woman in the White House that is so hateful towards Whites she’s willing to shame and humiliate her White VP, publicly?”
No of course not. Instead, they step right over that and attack Kamala’s unproven claims that she worked at McDonald’s as a kid.
Republicans are the absolute worst.”
> Republicans are the absolute worst.
That is not accidental. It’s intrinsic to their entire purpose.
>That is not accidental. It’s intrinsic to their entire purpose.
The “They have nowhere else to go” GOP strategy that keeps Whites on their plantation.
Politics 101 is to receive something for your vote. We have atomized blocs of voters that ask for and receive nothing.
Even blax get something for their votes. I suppose Church of Woke baizuo get some goodfeelz of moral superiority, which is kind of like a fresh hit for an addict. In terms of anything tangible, whites get zero. Unlike blax, we don’t even have freedom of association. As for the argument made by our resident hasbara that we should suck up to Repuke clowns, that’s just more literal insanity: doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result. Note that in South Africa, the whites who were permitted to establish Orania didn’t make a deal with the ‘conserviltards’ but with the ANC, who delivered.
“Remember, Kamala has already publicly disrespected Tim Walz for being White, to his face, on television”
I don’t watch television or read mainstream news, so I didn’t catch this. What happened?
Wow, Jews more likely to believe in replacement theory than Catholics. Maybe I was right all along when I trolled hardcore antisemites back in the day.
@Metal Gear/Iceman/DB
“Wow, Jews more likely to believe in replacement theory than Catholics. Maybe I was right all along when I trolled hardcore antisemites back in the day.”
One must remember that a slight majority of Papists aren’t even White. These non-White Papists are mostly Mestizo and Mulatto Hispanics. A minority of Hispanics are Latinos on the mostly White racial continuim. They are also overwhelmingly of foreign origin.
In general, most Papists are of foreign origin and have no roots to this country predating Carter or even Ronald Reagan. Vietnam is some sort of war some other county fought and not theirs. The remaining Papists are about equally divided between old immigrant Patato famine Paddies and 1848 revolutionary Krauts on one side and post 1876 Ellis Island era rif raf on the other. So, a substantial number of Papists have very shallow roots in America with the remainder being descended of marginalized hyphenated ethnic Americans.
Still, I am surprised that even with that background a larger percentage of Jews believe the Great Replacement is occurring than Papists. Even the dumbest Gumbah, Paddy, Bohdink, Kraut can see that immigration and desegregation have totally replaced their communities with non Whites and Foreigners. Their rates of intermarriage with mud people prove it. Just goes to prove that the Papists are behind the Great Replacement and the common Papist is cool with it as long as their communities remain Papists while the Prods are submerged.
The poll is for White Catholics, not all Catholics. Jews still finished ahead of White Catholics.
yes the gop is antiwhite and they will do anriwhate everything in spite of their base no matter how pro white their base is at any given time
I don’t think GOP is properly anti-White, but it surely could act more decisively on issues like the removal of the Confederate flag or monuments and other woke crap.
If I recall correctly, the GOP governor and legislature of Mississippi did act decisively when they removed the Confederate cross from the state flag, and a lot of GOP congresspeople voted in favor of renaming navy ships and army forts that had Confederate names. With friends like that….
You should not vote for them when they remove confederate flag or monuments, when they indulge woke whims.
Yes, the Republican Party is anti- white. They don’t care what we think.
Only the donors matter.
Then a few crumbs for the citizenry.
Dave Smith on Tucker. A far better explanation of why we should be skeptical of the establishments mandate that we uncritically support israel and place jews on a pedestal. Also why Trump needs to get away from israel first talking points.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YcMYwTVTS5I
This whole interview is a pro White message. This needs to be THE approach and the set of talking points people look at for reference. Shamefully this is coming from a freaking Libertarian (who isn’t even gay) while the dissident space now on BOTH sides of the isle are once again skrieking about the JQ and looking even more unhinged than ever to everyone else who is trying to afford their supper.
Daves positions, which are objectively pro White, aren’t the positions of the GOP, ergo, the GOP is anti White. Its not complicated. There is no fence to sit on. You are either pro White or anti White. There is no room for ambivalence, relativism or post modern faggotry.
Its even worse that Dave is also Jewish and somehow understands this better than White Nationalists, its frigging mind boggling how screwed up people’s priorities are we can’t even take our own side correctly.
I don’t think that the GOP is explicitly anti-white, they’re just too ashamed and embarrassed to admit that their base is so white.
There was a former Maine Governor, whom when told that Maine was the whitest state in the union, replied that it was nothing to be proud of. So embarrassing! Now send us lots of Somali refugees!
I like your blog but theres no need to state the obvious.
If theres any hope it’s going to come from Protestant Europe/France. America is a lost cause.
I think the GOP is anti-white. They do the whole DR3 routine. It’s sad. Meanwhile, another toll has been paid:
https://share.newsbreak.com/8iucwn66
“former Maine Governor, whom when told that Maine was the whitest state in the union, replied that it was nothing to be proud of. ”
Spit in our face, then expect us to fight the wars and pay the taxes, plus provide the great advances and maintain the infrastructure.
Off-Topic:
Important information about the coming economic collapse that will happen under both Trump and Harris. Both are pawns of BlackRock.
Blackrock, a fine transparent papist entity led by Msr. Larry Fink. Was the good monsignor in attendance when Hi-Fellatin’ Franny – appearing in drag as Satanyahoo – addressed the congress of whores recently to endless standing ovations? Just wonderin’…..
@Exalted Cyclops,
It’s the Frankists. The latest red herring to deflect away attention from the spawn of satan.
Msr. Larry Fink…. A good Catholic boy…?
“They are racially tolerant and approve of miscegenation.”
Then they are:
a) fools
b) not- Christian, but merely posturing protestants. Ez. 9:2, Tob. 4:12, II Cor 6:17
c) antinomian (CINOS- Christians in name only) ‘Yea, how LOATHE I thy law’ (paraphrase) ‘Not under law, but grace BS.
d) Already dead.
Time to either secede and create our own self-aware White nations per Sam Francis ( a papist!)
“What we as Whites must do is reassert our identity and our solidarity, and we must do so in explicitly racial terms through the articulation of a racial consciousness as Whites.”- Sam Francis
Secession is not just an idea, IT IS A DIVINE COMMAND.
Why would they hate an innocent people who have done know wrong? Why would they hate a people who have only sought to mind their own business and try to live their lives in peace? To tempt Gods wrath so it seems.
Yes, the GOP as an institution is anti white. It’s kind of obscene to even be asking that question at this point.
I honor my Confederate ancestors, but I don’t really care about the old southern aristocracy or the post-Civil War White political class, outside of the agrarians and mid-century populists. I respect what the populists and segregationists were trying to do, but the South is too weak and fractured socially (and racially) to fend off outside domination from a world power.
Small town Whites in the South are too insular and class divided to form a political movement, and there is no elite group of Whites at the state or regional levels that would even want to represent their fellow Whites. The money and prestige is in national and international politics, and everything is anti-White at those levels.
Anti-southern sentiment is part of the ruling ethos in the West, along with anti-German views. Neither national party is going to do us any favors, and they sure aren’t going to save us. The very best one can do is vote the lesser of evils and hope it buys time for a better outcome.