Groypers Self Destruct Over Wifejak

THE ROAD SO FAR:

  • Fuentes went viral with the “your body, my choice” remark after the election. The clip was shared by every Democratic influencer on social media. The sole purpose of sharing it was to drive a political wedge between White men and White women and to make the Right look toxic
  • I’ve already shared some of the violent fantasies about White women that Groypers are posting on X when they lost it over the Wifejak meme before Thanksgiving

It has only gotten better.

They have doubled down on it.

  • Fuentes is now fantasizing about murdering the Wifejak cartoon like Elliot Rodger
  • Groypers are sharing their pedophile fantasies about raping the Daughterjak cartoon
  • A femboy Nazi troon is trying to fight Chris Brunet to defend the honor of Fuentes
  • The mulatto Muslim pimp Andrew Tate has chimed to talk down to White men who love their wives and to defend his “anti-Zionist” ally Fuentes

The Wifejak / Husbandjak / Daughterjak memes depict nothing more than a wholesome White family doing normal things that ordinary married couples can relate too. It has absolutely enraged the Groyper camp of activists who are weird, toxic, antisocial, degenerate closeted homosexual freaks.

Anyway, it says a lot about the judgment of activists that this is one of the key figures who they have rallied behind since the demise of the Alt-Right in 2017. I can understand the suspicion and skepticism about Trump after his disappointing first term, but this illustrates a deeper problem. When your thought leaders are people like MILO, Richard Spencer, Andrew Anglin and Nick Fuentes who you have given millions of dollars, it shouldn’t come as a surprise when you remain stuck forever on the fringe.

27 Comments

  1. I have a feeling that some people, I repeat some people in the U.S., take politics as a game. The ‘idea of politics, world and society they have is based: either on a transient and strolling phase (of the series I am a neo-Nazi in my twenties, then in my thirties I will have the liberal phase and then the radical chic phase), or on taking things too much as a joke or antics (for example “but yes I was joking that Hitler was great and that immigration and globalism are not good”, or again “I am an out gay man and I support pedophilia but I support traditional society and I am against woke”). So as far as the transitional phase is concerned, someone who at the age of 20 has not yet matured a fixed idea about society and the world, who does not yet know whether he has conservative/anarchist/liberal values, and worse still who does not know in his 30s……..is a buffoon, he is like a child who has rap/rock and other genres phases. Shit it’s not like they are 14 years old. In my neck of the woods if you are right-wing at 20, you are right-wing at 30/40/50…….until the end of your days (of course making criticism of right-wing candidates as well).

    Regarding the other point, I greatly admired the alt-right and still have admiration for many aspects of that model, but politics is not for clowns, for those who don’t really believe what they think and preach. Anyone who says certain things just to get visibility or to make dumb jokes is a jerk. Politics is a serious thing that impacts our lives whether we like it or not and those of our children. Still talking about my areas, I have never met people who have political ideas so as a joke or who say exaggerated things and then say “I was joking.” If you joke don’t do politics but go to the circus.

  2. I notice your posts have gone from “women should participate in white nationalism” to “women should be good wives.” I like that more personally. I don’t like what Fuentes has to say about people who don’t have money.

    • @Metal Gear/Iceman/DB,

      “I notice your posts have gone from “women should participate in white nationalism” to “women should be good wives.” I like that more personally. I don’t like what Fuentes has to say about people who don’t have money.”

      White women marrying White men, having White babies, and being good White wives is a CORE element of the White Nationalist movement. In some ways, it IS the White Nationalist movement. Men who have such wives should be grateful and feel blessed for their good fortune.

  3. Nick Fuentes has been an Op since day one. He has grifted hundreds of thousands of dollars, been financed by dubious sources, coordinated with known foreign intelligence services, worked with and pimped for known gay e celebs, abandoned his followers who obeyed his orders to enter the Capitol, and all in an effort to corral rightwingers into this slaughterhouse which his movement has become.

    Again, I will point out the severe damage associating with him has done to people like Peter Brimelow and Jared Taylor, who despite many warnings continued working and promoting him until very recently. Much worse, they did this despite the warnings of people who had decades of providing proven policy support and intelligence to them. Brimelow and Taylor, apparentely believed an emotionally stunted, bisexual Incel test tube Mestizo baby was the way of the future. Ooops.

  4. Don’t want to be micromanaged by women at every level of society? Don’t want families with just 2 kids on a good day because muh female independence? Tough shit, you are now a closeted homosexual. Lol. I understand that fuentes and co are obnoxious, and that Tate is a mulatto, but even a broken clock is right twice a day as the saying goes. Hypergamy is real, women breaking up families over I’m bored is real, no fault divorce is real. It’s statistically a matter of time rather than of whether you will have to deal with it or not for your age group. Shitting on Fuentes & co won’t do a thing about it.

    • 75% of divorces initiated by women, gives me pause to think.

      Curtis Preim, cofounder of Nvidia, could be the richest man in the world if not for his violent shrewish wife, who tore his life apart.
      No woman is worth sacrificing 400 billion, especially an ugly shrew.

      • To be fair, the divorce statistics are another thing that is highly misconstrued in our circles ( just like several other things are). One out of every two women isn’t just going to leave their husbands because they are bored but stuff like that keeps getting repeated and it is destructive.

        Matt Walsh, who by no means supports feminists, and other people like him, have broken the stats down better to make more sense and it sounds far more reasonable. There was a video where Matt Walsh broke the statistics down by himself that I can’t find but this is another one where he interviews a divorce lawyer:

        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VYSCI1D8TIo&pp=ygUlTWF0dCB3YWxzaCBvbiA1MCAlIGRpdm9yY2Ugc3RhdGlzdGljcw%3D%3D

        I don’t support feminism or women who behave badly but we need to have more reasonable, nuanced, and calm discussions on this topic instead of driving white men away from their women the way feminists have tried driving women from men.

    • Absolutely! I have zero love for Fuentes but to throw the baby out with the bathwater is disingenuous at least and possibly just as damaging as turning a blind eye to female indiscretion at most.
      To be deeply angry at women is a natural discourse at this point in time. No, it doesn’t warrant fantasies of REDRUM, but it also shouldn’t just be dismissed because “my wife is my best friend.” In that way, you’re just a blind and misguided.

    • @US of AIPAC,

      That would be Christopher Brunet of the jew filled and financed (((Manhattan Institute)))).

      Hell hath no fury like a Nazi femboy scorned https://t.co/zVilzAnXEw pic.twitter.com/5kOvBgPtMH

      — Chris Brunet (@realChrisBrunet) November 28, 2024

      I think a small dive into Chris Brunet is necessary, since HW is citing him as an ally.

      Brunet supports interracial marriage, and writes that 97% American also support interracial marriage.

      The reactions are encouraging though.

      https://x.com/realchrisbrunet/status/1853718407713054887

      Chris Brunet was one of the leading voices on the koshervative right to remove Gentile Ivy League presidents that allowed free speech on the genocide in Gaza that he and fellow shabbos goy Christopher Rufo found to be “antisemetic.”

      https://dailyrake.ca/2024/11/01/conservative-manhattan-institute-hires-former-porn-whore-who-ragequite-dailymail-over-trannyphobia/

      The excellent investigative journalism at The Daily Rake in the article linked above is worth a few minutes to read, in order to understand what kind of goys are working at the “conservative” Manhattan Institute.”

      IMHO, Brunet is the newest and younger version of a Mockingbird op similar to the one Tucker Carlson continues to fill on the alternative media GOP, but in Brunet’s case, in a koshervative ‘think tank.’

  5. “MILO, Richard Spencer, Andrew Anglin and Nick Fuentes who you have given millions of dollars”

    I certainly never gave them a cent.
    I really doubt that many on this forum did.

    • No AIPAC, Fuentes will not be dismissed. He is a fed that the left wing constantly promote in their media, and bloggers on the right are paid to write about him. It is all AstroTurf and lies, but federal money talks

      • Ok, another ‘poison the well operation’ to keep realistic people away from the noble cause. Smear it with crazy sauce.
        Well, I can’t see how anyone could consider him other than a comic parody show.

  6. Fuentes is a fed. Just a different flavor than the Spencer operation. You’re seeing its intended results now. Even the resident hasbara admits as much. For once, he’s not altogether lying. BTW, Satanists of various stripes are required now and again to “reveal the method” to their targets – most of whom are way too clueless to see what’s afoot.

    • I always believed and still do that so-called White dissidents those endgame is to keep Whites on either judeo-republican or judeo-democrat teams were de-radicalization agents of the powers that be with the lies of changing jewish teams red and blue from the inside. They are judas goats keeping Europeans on the USZOG plantation.

      That’s the op.

  7. “Anyway, it says a lot about the judgment of activists that this is one of the key figures who they have rallied behind since the demise of the Alt-Right in 2017.I can understand the suspicion and skepticism about Trump after his disappointing first term, but this illustrates a deeper problem. When your thought leaders are people like MILO, Richard Spencer, Andrew Anglin and Nick Fuentes”

    With all due respect, I think this is confirmation bias. It’s not as bad as you think. All these figures are generally irrelevant outside of Nick and his small army of homosexuals. MILO is seen as toxic by everyone. I haven’t even heard of Anglin in years. Spencer is running a behind closed doors Apollonian cult that has numbers less than 100.

    The real fault regarding Nick Fuentes and the broader movement is how everyone gave him a pass years and years ago. Everywhere I saw people say “Ah, he’s young, he’ll be better when he gets older. I’m impressed by his organizing ability” when he was always a douche. He was always starting fights with people, always attempting to steal others momentum, always an effeminate NEET shut in. He put dumb cartoons like spongebob squarepants and movies like despicable me at the forefront of his support groups. He was insufferable. It’s been great seeing him get dragged into the light and revealed as the weirdo that he is, since all the signs were obvious before to people who didn’t envy his army of gay manchildren.

    • After MILO and Spencer flamed out in 2017, the movement shifted toward Anglin and Fuentes who laughably promised “good optics” and political pragmatism. That’s who it has chosen and rewarded as its “leaders”

  8. @Exalted Rusbot,

    “Fuentes is a fed. Just a different flavor than the Spencer operation. You’re seeing its intended results now. Even the resident hasbara admits as much.”

    Actually, I am the one here who first exposed him as some sort of Fed Papist Op. We were kong watching him and collaborated with him on a number of ventures. It was then we discovered his deep cover.

    Eventually, the little faggot sabotaged a number of campaigns including a very large effort at establish an international alliance of rightwing nationalist parties. Although, it succeeded to a degree, we were still able to keep a portion of the alliance alive and are now having multiple conferences across the world. But, the involvement of the US is extremely limited due to the damage he and his subordinates caused.

    We strongly encouraged Hunter to disengage as the Gay Grand Inquisitor succeeded in infiltrating everything from VDare to AmRen and the GOP to Patriot groups and TPUSA to College Republicans. Nonetheless, Hunter has certainly saved himself. Slowly, our counter-actions have slowly boxed Fuentes and the Groypers in, but sadly not in time to save VDare or see AmRen undamaged, or to see Alex Jones smeared by association. The Gay Grand Inquisitor is a very damaging little snake who will be well rewarded by his Papist masters.

  9. Fuentes is really a non-entity. The “Your body my choice” line is hilarious, if you’re worried about offending the baby-butchers because they’re women and you’re scared of women, you’re the problem.

    The truth is that these people raging now about Fuentes, then about Anglin, whether intentionally or not, are acting and speaking as though Jewish and female approval is very important to them. Why even discuss Fuentes?

    Bizarre cartoon Gore-memes promoting obscenities are meaningless, they can be made by anyone.

    Getting self-righteous about something astro-turfed and stupid like many of these “memes” (aren’t they getting kind of old and tired?) is not a good look. Bigger Fish to Fry. Like Pro-Zionist Protestants. Boil them in oil, on Friday.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*