I’ve always enjoyed Colin Woodard’s work, not because I agree with his liberal vision of American civic identity, but because at least he understands how far back this debate goes. It gets tiresome having to deal with people who believe America was fine until the Jews came here and ruined it.
“There is a battle raging across America (and soon in the halls of the Supreme Court) over what it means to be an American and what our nation should aspire to be.
It’s part of a war between two stories of nationhood that we’ve been waging since the United States was created 249 years ago.
One vision is civic. It says that we Americans may lack a common history, religion or ethnicity, but what we share are the ideals in the Declaration of Independence: Each human has a natural and equal right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. To be American, in this tradition, is to create a society dedicated to making these ideals a reality.
The other vision — an animating force inside the Trump administration — is exclusive and ethnonationalist. Vice President JD Vance laid it out explicitly in a speech this summer: a national identity based not on ideals, but on privileged heritage and bloodlines. …”
Is America a White Man’s Country?
Is American national identity based on race?
Yes, the majority of White Americans were race realists who believed America was a White Man’s Country until well into the 20th century when the last vestiges of race-based citizenship were dismantled in the Civil Rights Movement during the 1950s and 1960s. Racial considerations shaped American immigration policy from the American founding through the Immigration Act of 1965. As late as the 1960s, Americans were still grappling with questions like whether Catholics were fully American.
No, the liberal current has always been an important part of the American history and the role of race in American identity has been contested since the earliest days of the Republic. Some of the leading figures of the Founding generation like Thomas Jefferson were race realists while others like Samuel Stanhope Smith were passionate racial egalitarians. Most states restricted citizenship and voting rights to Whites but New England with the exception of Connecticut was more inclusive. The Puritans originally tried to integrate Indians into their settlements. Davy Crockett opposed Andrew Jackson’s forced relocation of the Five Civilized Tribes to Oklahoma. John Quincy Adams defended the Amistad slaves at the Supreme Court. Massachusetts repealed its anti-miscegenation law in the antebellum era and pioneered civil rights. The Dred Scott decision, which established that blacks were not American citizens, was so controversial that it was one of the causes of the Civil War. John Brown attacked the South at Harper’s Ferry in an attempt to incite a race war against slaveowners. Southerners repeatedly voted down the Wilmot Proviso which would have reserved the Western territories to Whites. Texas seceded from the Union to remain a White Republic. Blacks were recruited and fought for the Union Army during the Civil War. John Wilkes Booth assassinated Lincoln because he wanted to give voting rights to blacks in Louisiana.
The truth is that White Americans have always struggled over the issue. Woodard is correct that there has always been this tug of war over defining America between civic nationalists and ethnonationalists. The ethnonationalist camp itself has been divided in the past between white supremacists and White Nationalists. This fracture was central to the debate over the expansion of slavery into the Western territories. Similarly, the liberal camp fractured during Reconstruction into integrationists and skeptics of democracy. The liberal side was ascendant during the Civil War and Reconstruction. The ethnonationalist camp mounted a comeback in the Gilded Age and Progressive era. Liberals were empowered like never before to redefine the boundaries of American identity in the post-World War II era. We are currently in the middle of the latest conservative retreat from the Second Reconstruction.
It is impossible to reduce this complex debate over American national identity and all the twists and turns it has taken over the course of 250 years to “IT’S THE JEWS!!!” Even if every Jew in America vanished tomorrow, there is no reason to believe it would be concluded. Granted, it is true that Jews have played an outsized role in this debate for the last century, but they have simply tilted it to one side.
It is impossible to reduce this complex ….to “IT’S THE JEWS!!!”
That granted, they still represent a terrible threat nationally and globally.
The helmsman is only one member of the crew, yet he steers the ship. Such are the jwz.
Anglos, of the British-American variety, are the most simple, free-market/calvanist types in history. But their moral integrity will eventually do the right thing for the community if left in a vaccum. For instance, Jews fought ferociously in the 1920s to prevent the restrictive immigration act, but the elite anglos did get it past.
by the late 20th century , they lost the power and multimedia was an amplifier for the new jewish establishmetn.
Jews are merely the opportunistic infection, not the actual disease. They are of course responsible for their own evil behaviors and will ultimately face judgement for them, irrespective of what apostates like John Hagee say. Jews were not expelled from 110 countries because they were such fine and upstanding folks, despite what they and their shills here like to say.
If whites would cure the disease, the opportunistic infection would wane and fall away over time – even at this late date.
Better to go back a step further to the Enlightenment, itself, and its culmination in the French Revolution. This is where the real split in the European psyche began. The left/right divide. The distinction between “progressives” and “conservatives.”
The “progressive” wants to freely define himself and his own identity without the restrictive chains of the material world. (Recall Rousseau’s famous opening to Emile: “Men are born free but are everywhere in chains).
The “conservative” thinks the only meaningful and intelligible way to define a man is within the context of a particular, material, existence. Our biology, our history, our geographical location, etc.
When thought of this way, we can see that many of the neo-pagan race realists are radical progressives, only they disagree with other radical progressives about how a man ought to arbitrarily categorize himself. All progressives want to build a machine to launch us into the trans-humanist event-horizon, the neo-pagans want to tinker with it a little to ensure some honored place for a statistically-relevant gene sequence.
As for me and mine? Give me dirt or give me death…
(Oops..I meant: Rousseau’s famous opening line of his “Social Contract”, not Emile…)
Total horseshit. If the liberal left actually believed in the concept of a civic basis for our society, they would take steps to ensure that basis. They would be originalists in the Constitutional sense and support things like a shared value system and mundane things like Snglish as a common and required language.
What people like Woodard and his enablers at the NYT’s actually mean is having an elastic Constitution and situational civics as it were, as the country slouches toward Gomorrah.
All the blood and soil crowd is saying is there has to be a standard, and situational ethics or civics ain’t it.
Here is what is different about the Jews:
Unlike previous generations of leftists, who were sincere egalitarians, Jewish leftists insincerely use leftism as a tool for Jewish ethno-supremacy. This is the theme of Culture of Critique – much of what we now call “the left” is really just an exercise in anti-antisemitism.
This is clearly the case with liberal Zionists such as the ADL and Chuck Schumer who support genocidal fundamentalist ethno-supremacist fascism in Israel, but insist on multi-cultural liberalism in America.
“Jewish leftists insincerely use leftism as a tool for Jewish ethno-supremacy. ”
Jewish (whatever) insincerely use (whatever) as a tool for Jewish ethno-supremacy.
Substitute anything you want, it’ll be true.
Absolutely true. Always have and always will. They are really remarkably predictable. Communism and Finance Capitalism (= usury racketeering) are paths that lead to the very same place.
Exactly right. Would the removal of jevvs solve all the problems of White communities overnight? Of course not, but jevv-removal is an absolutely necessary action to enable the recovery of our people, both here and in Europe. As long as the Talmudic tribe is able to live among White people, we will always be damaged, degraded, and imperiled.
In the above quote Woodard states that: “Vice President JD Vance laid it out explicitly in a speech this summer: a national identity based not on ideals, but on privileged heritage and bloodlines”. You mean the dude married to a brown skin, daughter of immigrants, Hindu is establishing a race based national identity? Really? Establishing an identity that his wife and mixed-race children are not part of? Really? Do liberals like Woodard really believe that? Regrettably, Vance is *not* advocating for any form of White identitarianism, neither nationalist nor supremacist, neither country wide nor just for Dixie.
Wallace has the temerity to use JD Vance lecturing everyone about a national identity based on bloodlines. It would be amusing if JD’s destruction of his own bloodlines wasn’t so utterly disgusting.
I think Jaideep Vance must have some real underlying trauma and disappointments in the podunk, drug addict, loose Wyatt women he grew up around. Sometimes Whites just damage themselves, and don’t love one another to the point they turn to the welcoming arms of another race, eager and happy to love them. I’ve seen it many times. I even lived it in the past, but thank God found my natural blonde wife to start my family with. I get it, Jaideep. I’ve got cousins who don’t reach out or want to meet up at all. The pain is very real.
Joe Miner NYC,
I am not accusing you of this, since this is my first time seeing a comment on this topic from you, but I don’t understand why white men are constantly given passes for race mixing in our circles while white women get viciously attacked for it. I understand that it is worse for women to do it for biological reasons but I wish people in our circles spent as much time trying to understand race mixing white women as they do race mixing white men. In defense of young white women I can assure everyone that a big reason why they race mix is because their daddies are constantly worshipping black athletes as heroes. Even Southern daddies do this. It is disgusting. Anyways either we make excuses for both sexes or we attack both sexes equally. The lopsided approach to this in our circles is very unfair. I am not accusing you of this since I haven’t seen you comment on this enough for context, but your comment reminded me of it.
” daddies are constantly worshipping black athletes as heroes.”
Is that ever true.
Not to mention how jw media pumps commercial sports down our throats.
You’re nobody unless you follow ‘our team’.
United States of AIPAC, thanks
@Joe Putnam and Ringo D:
JD Vance is on the horns of what I call “The Men of Amren (American Renaissance) Dilemma.” Many of these men met and married Indian, Mestiza, or East Asian women before they got “red-pilled.” Of course, a lot of the single ones seem to have an Asian fetish themselves and have a serious decision to make in their lives. Really, the only identity group they openly bash is Black with a smidgeon of animus against Organized Jewry.
Technically, it is reasonable for Vance to assume that his children share his bloodline. The three of them look a lot like him and Vance spilled enough cream into Usha’s coffee that they could pass as Southern European stock. There is a picture of his daughter Mirabel with her blonde first cousin and, thanks to how diverse we of European stock are in our hair color, eye color, and skin tones, she does not stand out.
So, Vance himself, as a politician, knows better than anyone else that American politics IS Identity Politics ever since the Nation’s elites co-signed The Melting Pot American theory presented by Israel Zangwill’s play of the same name. In 2028, Vance knows Gavin Newsom who, like most leftist White Democrats, talk one way but live another, i.e. has a White spouse and White children. This former Senator from Ohio has to be reading the tea leaves from the Kentucky Gubnatorial Election results.
The GOP Establishment, which Sam Francis called The Stupid Party, has a history of running Black candidates that can neither entice Black Democrats nor White Republicans, especially those Whites who are racially conscious, to vote for them. Case in point, the race for Governor of Kentucky where Andy Beshear, a White Democrat with a White wife and children handily beat Daniel Cameron, a Black Republican with a White wife and Mulatto children.
The play made much of how all these warring ethnonationalities managed to not co-exist peacefully but get along amicably once they immigrated to the USA. Indeed, I once went to a popular restaurant that was owned by a Bosnian, a Serb, and a Croat. Another town had something they called Aqua Fest which featured a night where the vendors served German, Czech, and Polish food. These groups still don’t play very well with each other in Europe’s sandbox.
Of course, the Heritage WASP Americans, seeing a lot of mass immigration from Europe for the cheap labor scheme that it was, passed through a very restrictive immigration law that sharply capped it and limited it to majority Northern European countries.
But the camel already had its nose under the tent and the Usual Suspects fabricated America as The Proposition Nation to explain why warring ethnonationalists could get along so well in America. Our FREEDOMS and SHARED VALUES. So, helped by massive LYING by those who passed it, The Immigration And Nationality Act of 1965 opened the floodgates of America to the entire Third World.
That, and decades of Anti-White policy created and imposed by Red Diaper Babies whose parents or grandparents came in with waves of Ellis Island immigrants which was directed principally at White Men made it not only possible but probable for a low-status aspirational young White man like JD Vance to meet and marry Usha Bala Chilukuri.
No one knows better than Vance the slippery slopes that Multiculturalism or Purity Spiraling represents to American Nationalism which is why, I think, he is trying to square that circle by pushing Civic Nationalism that the Heritage White Americans who created the United States dominate with what the Left calls “White Adjacents,” like the Working Class Hispanic males who joined with White males to vote for Trump in 2024.
Vance’s possible Civic Nationalism will probably push what Occidental Observer’s Kevin McDonald calls Implicit Whiteness. There will be no formal caste system like that in India, but more like the informal caste system in Latin America where those Whites who want to mix can do so without seeing themselves or their children become society’s pariahs, but those Whites who want to preserve their bloodlines can do so without harassment.
Clytemnestra, interesting perspective. I liked how you brought Founding Stock Americans into your discussion. In regards to JD Vance, I personally don’t give him a pass for race mixing, but I already addressed that enough in my above comment to Joe Miner. On the topic of how Hispanic males voted in the last election, I think the results were adjusted in the next weeks after the election, where it was proven that Hispanic males actually didn’t vote for Trump in as high as percentages as was originally reported and once again it was White women who voted closest to White men which is usually the case at least since I have started keeping track.
@Clytemnestra and Courtney from Alabama,
Yes, this was one of his better posts in recent times and back to his usual standards from back further before he became a Acolythus episcopi running interference for the Papacy. Hope he continues it.
However, Clytemnesra, you would be better informed regarding the JD Vance Usha thing to consider the development of the so called Euroasians and sometimes the Anglo-Indians in the British Indian and Asian Empire. There were A LOT of them, perhaps as many as there were British in India, which means there were about 2.5% or more of the Raj. Gunga Din, the title character of Gunga Din was considered to be one.
Depending on the ethnicity of the Indian, the Euroasians tended to come out strikingly more Whiter looking than a straight even percentage would consider or if not had very clearly defined English or North Atlantic aka Atlantean physical features.
Sometimes in the Northern areas, such unions produced mixes that were stunningly beautiful. These were clearly similar to unions of High Persian with European types. These come out consistently looking similar whether it’s a Blue eyed Kurd or Persian with an Atlantean and so is probably a recreation of a national standard and the closest approximation we have of the original Aryans.
Examples include Merle Oberon
https://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&client=ms-android-google&source=android-browser&q=Merle+Oberon#vhid=E3cERoT72jVI_M&vssid=_pUQSafwh2M-Q8g-f6KxJ_55&ebo=0
Catherine Bell
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/catherine-bell-movies-tv-shows-144413076.html
Sarah Shahi
https://paradise.fandom.com/wiki/Sarah_Shahi
Vivien Lee
https://www.instagram.com/p/CkltHgEPpkz/
Alia Bhatt
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Alia-Bhatt
Naomi Scott
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Scott#:~:text=Naomi%20Scott%20was%20born%20on,a%20young%20age%2C%20is%20Gujarati
Rhona Mitra
https://www.google.com/search?q=Rhona+Mitra&sca_esv=3e9e96290d2670da&source=hp&ei=NUgSabCzKaerur8PqM-jyQI&oq=Rhona+Mitra&gs_lp=EhFtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1ocCILUmhvbmEgTWl0cmEyCBAuGIAEGLEDMgsQABiABBixAxiDATIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABEj7GVC8Dli8DnABeACQAQCYAXmgAXmqAQMwLjG4AQPIAQD4AQL4AQGYAgKgApYBqAIPwgIQEAAYAxi0AhjqAhiPAdgBAZgDDfEF6Ka88sZVTvy6BgQIARgKkgcDMS4xoAeTBrIHAzAuMbgHiQHCBwMzLTLIBxs&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-hp#vhid=lD26awJ-PFIReM&vssid=_OkgSaZ-bEuTjkPIP7KbXgA4_64&ebo=0
I am choosing women because they often epitomize beauty which is the careful balance between looks, poise, character, etc and good looking ones are often featured historically. Obviously the attractiveness of these unions run the gamut and certainly some of more darker than others. But what we see is essentially how modern Middle Easterners are descended from white European types and mixes of darker Arabian and Semitic and even Indian descent. The more northern Indian and whiter you go the more they look like Vivien Lee or this other socialite whose name I can’t remember.
It’s the later that fascinate me because I’ve looked at unions between true high born Iranians, often of more White features with Europeans, especially of northern types, and the they look all standardized. They have the same EXTREMELY beautiful and slightly exotic look, often darker hair not lighter, and I believe these were the Aryans of the ancient days. The blonder ones we owe not to Aryans so much as the so called Atlantean origin. This division between the Sealands from the Hinterlands is the actual origin of European people and the Hinterland or Aryan grouping I think I’ve found the look.
Regardless going back to JD Vance, I am sure his children aren’t going to lol like Vivien Lee. Usha, although of fine features still has to much Dravidian to get a Vivien Lee. But, his children will likely look like attractive Mediterraneun people in skin tone with finer North Atlantic features.
As to Hispanic voting rates, yes Courtney is correct. Every single damn time the bloody consultant class in the GOP starts screaming like Beatlemania girls that theybe finally got the magic sauce to cure imminent demographic doom from Hispanics voting us into Banana Republic apocalypse. Instead every single time, the votes get paired back. Yes, Trump didn’t get the votes. I noted this earlier when I discovered the totals of votes deriving the pro Hispanic are conservative percentages didn’t match the actual votes. Sure enough when the missing votes came in there were either all White American voting for Trump are all Brown voting for Biden Hitler. Southern woman continue to prove every single political Consulting talking head wrong about ethnic voting patterns in America over and over and over again. Southern women to Third Worlder political deceivees are like the Holy Cross to vampires.
Before you get too enamored of J. D. “Vance” do consider that he actually converted to Novus Ordo Lavender-mafia Papism, the (not) Ol’ time religion of Nancy Pelosi, Gavin Newsom, Joe Biden, William F. Cuckley, anti-popes from John XXIII forward – and even the late Charlie Kirk (what gives with that?). Yes there are trad Catholics who reject all of the above, and even some who reject at least part of the above (like the soon to be excommunicated Vagano) but they are almost as rare as jews who actually reject the Talmud.
AGB, thanks!
@Courtney From Alabama:
ITA that the numbers of Hispanic Males who voted for Trump were vastly inflated, but it is better for the interests of the White Right to engage in realpolitik pragmatism and play along.
IMO, Implicit Whiteness (which is SOP in Mexico and Latin America where the Whitest part of their hierarchies is at the top as you can see if you tune into any telenovelas) is the only hope for securing the existence of White people and the best of all futures for White children.
A large development of Mixed Whites, like Vance’s children or the son of the light-skinned Sikh, Nimrata – Nikki Haley – Randhawa who lean White or the Hispanics who actually voted for Trump (and I would bet dollars to donuts many of them were more Castizo and second to third generation American) would be a White Adjacent buffer to pure Whites who grew up before the complete takeover of Cultural Marxism with reverence for the Founding Fathers.
Case in point, the debate between Nalin Haley (light-skinned Sikh, Nimrata – Nikki Haley Rhandawa’s son) and Vivek Ramaswamy over what being an American means. Well, Ramaswamy, of course, leaning into the whole Propositional or Credal Nation Propaganda to urge White Republicans to abandon Identity Politics lifting up Zohran “Tax White Neighborhoods” Mamdani’s campaign promises to make NYC more affordable as the model to pursue.
Well, Nalin Haley came back with the response that Christians have the right to be represented by their own. There’s a tragic sort of irony that even the son of a Sikh woman cannot openly acknowledge the racial interests of Whites and had to speak in code. But Christians was once a term used by Non-Whites to describe White Europeans centuries ago.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/nikki-haleys-son-calls-vivek-ramaswamys-lessons-from-zohran-mamdanis-winning-cringe/articleshow/125136200.cms#:~:text=Following%20election%20defeats%2C%20Vivek%20Ramaswamy%20urged%20Republicans%20to,religious%20identity%2C%20calling%20Ramaswamy%27s%20views%20outdated%20and%20cringe.
I would much prefer dealing with a population of Nalin Haleys who have a blood (through his father) to the Founding Stock and intuitively understand the blood and soil connection than more Vivek Ramaswamys who exploit any weaknesses found in the freedoms granted by the FS to establish his own political power base.
Yes, such a scenario is not anything that any of us would want until you consider the alternative. Whites being ruled over and dominated as their own Untouchable caste by disparate groups of Non-Whites who neither know nor care about the Constitution or any freedoms that would protect Whites. That’s why I hope JD Vance’s “Men of Amren” Dilemma is resolved with a compromise that uses both the Whites and White Adjacents as allies and mutual protection.
“The three of them look a lot like him and Vance spilled enough cream into Usha’s coffee that they could pass as Southern European stock.”
Absolutely not. Some of you boomers are really confused.
The poor young man with the German surname
lived in a country where blurred racial boundaries
can inevitably mean death. How many senseless
“isolated cases” must there be before we wake up?
https://lawandcrime.com/crime/blood-everywhere-18-year-old-fatally-stabbed-by-man-leaving-walmart-after-he-said-the-teen-kicked-his-shopping-cart-police-say/
“must there be before we wake up?”
Don’t hold your breath.
Collectively, WHITES are too damn slow, lax and witless.
I really need to submit an article on the Vance-mind. It’s common in high-end professional schools, whether medical school or first-tier law, like Vance.
It’s intelligent, but highly alienated and disturbed men, who reject their communities and are ripe for falling into the ‘other’, which is very common in these institutions, given the Hindu or Chinese clan family violence for good grades.
I always thought Massachusetts repealed its interracial marriage laws because the concept of anyone actually doing so at the time was thought to be so ridiculous that a formal law wasn’t necessary. The concepts of crime and deviancy are related and for a good reason. Because the deviant acts actually do occur sometimes, it’s why they’re considered crimes and laws are needed. If nobody ever murdered each other, there would not and never have been and never would be laws against murder. It’s because murder does happen that the laws need to exist and enforcement mechanisms need to exist.
Looking forward to the incoming Second Redemption.
Balogh considers Zio-Don’s “extraju-
dicial killing” to be unlawful, as it
comes directly from the Judenplaybook.
https://substack.com/@warrenbalogh/note/c-170387841
But the willful destruction of “narco-
submarines” should be covered by law.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/37211876/narco-submarine-intercepted-atlantic-cocaine/
https://www.thetimes.com/world/europe/article/portugal-narco-submarine-cocaine-s7d8c3k0n
The “East Germans” don’t just vote for the AfD, they
also consume the most harmful drugs on the market.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4E1u3_S1p8
1.5 M clicks in one day, just as Judentube intended.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgXZ6bVuuN8
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Gigas
The carrot-colored pizza baker from Jew York sounds
like Mickey Mouse, who is also said to have been gay.
https://bollywoodcelebnetworth.in/2024/05/03/andrew-gentile-wikipedia-age-height-net-worth-family/
PS “Gentile gang”
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/what-is-factually-wrong-with-t-RYERO2QBQ..JQJpwgflDXA
Because Perplexity AI generated two points in the link, it is possible that your website will not identify it as a complete link, but only the first part of it. You will therefore need to copy the entire link and paste it into your browser’s address bar. Alternatively, you can use this shortened link. https://tinyurl.com/5fn46xhd
(“points” => dots, of course)
https://counter-currents.com/2025/11/will-leftist-terrorism-become-commonplace/
So this is how far we’ve come: Turks shouting “Alerta, alerta,
antifascista!” in the anti-German fake parliament. It doesn’t
sound much more appealing than their usual “Allahu Akbar.”
https://rmx.news/article/all-you-damn-maga-freaks-you-will-follow-kirk-to-hell-german-antifa-claims-responsibility-for-arson-attack-against-afd-politicians-family-vehicle/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQxpD2TCgGE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzkr7qlNTMk
https://www.amren.com/videos/2025/10/a-truly-inspiring-weekend/
Amazingly simple Amish solutions for self-sufficiency.
https://www.youtube.com/@FrugalSolutionsTV
As descendants of German-speaking immigrants, they even thought of their ethnic relatives in Europe and provided their videos with AI translations, some of which were unfortunately incorrect.
However, when timid Germans complained about this, they responded with heartfelt thanks for their interest and an invitation to subscribe to the channel. Very impressive, they are true Christians.
https://www.youtube.com/@Economy-L%C3%B6sungen
https://nypost.com/2025/11/05/world-news/france-driver-plows-through-10-people-on-ile-doleron/
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20251024-french-court-gives-algerian-woman-life-sentence-for-murdering-schoolgirl
https://linkmix.co/46341506
America’s nostalgic women reject the car as
means of transportation like the Amish, but
are kinda unfamiliar with the consequences.
https://media.gettr.com/group5/getter/2025/11/01/09/e7e86e04-1a3b-2e88-4200-1304108b9795/out.mp4
Harry Graf von Kessler was a “sensitive anal-
pervert” like “dr.” Quackory Schlongson, who
mistakenly considers himself a “patriot” (and
deceives everyone else about true intentions).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_von_Kessler
Amren-Jewess Katz:
https://www.amren.com/blog/2025/11/zwerner-vs-parker-day-one/
In such cases, the jury is regularly faced with a dilem-
ma: Who ranks higher in the social hierarchy of vic-
tims: the white woman – or the black perpetrator?
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/where-comes-the-kinda-german-s-lrGpWYugTK6uAkZNjbHVdw
When it comes to such issues, the Lat-
vians are are clearly miles ahead of us:
https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20251031-latvia-treaty-violence-against-women
Those who “question” their own existence
in such a foolish manner should not be sur-
prised when they are actually eliminated…
https://www.amren.com/podcasts/2025/11/is-it-ok-to-kill-white-supremacists/
First rule of rhetoric: never ask stupid
questions that give others power over
you!!! Instead, constitute power your
self through the way you ask questions!
So don’t ever ask, “Do you want to ma-
nage our household finances?” Instead,
“Do you want to receive your allowance
at the beginning or end of the month?”
Devastating “feminism,” “critical whiteness stu-
dies,” “classism,” etc. are gnawing away at the
pillars of male dominance: “Power is constituted
in the semantic application of rhetorical patterns.”
We do not deny or reject this in the slightest! We are
men, we want, need, and strive for power! Power alo-
ne determines the direction we all take! It is therefo-
re solely the man’s responsibility to gain this power!
Power’s Two Faces
Power is not the sharpened chain
that pulls another to obey,
nor is it conquest or domain—
imposing will, demanding sway.
True power quietly appears
when interests claim their space and right,
not by subduing hopes or fears,
but by persuasion, honesty, light.
To rule is to fence and to confine,
to press a rival firm below,
while influence—subtler by design—
lets common purpose start to grow.
But many cooks may spoil the pot,
and only one can steer the helm.
You can’t both lead and play the top,
nor wear two crowns within one realm.
Power is not about power over,
but power to act and make things move.
The “doer” shapes with steady hand,
not the tyrant craving command.
Nietzsche’s will, a force profound,
the ceaseless pulse that spins life’s round.
Not mere control or iron hold,
but vibrant strength that shapes the bold.
Power is energy in motion,
not idle wishes, dreams, or notion.
Let will and strength reshape the world,
through acts where true resolves are hurled.
Power’s core is self-surpassing,
a strength that bends but never breaking.
To rise, reforge, evolve, improve—
the inner fire that fuels the move.
True power bears responsibility—
the weight of freedom’s sovereignty.
To stand for all one holds as true,
and shape the world with conscience too.
The first, a tower built on sand,
precarious, brittle, crowned with pride.
The second, rooted in demand
for fairness, reason, and what’s inside.
So seek the strength to shift the view,
to wield the power that makes anew.
Let power mean creating force,
the active path, not passive course.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/elon-musk-launched-grokipedia-heres-how-it-compares-to-wikipedia
He wants to replace Bolshevikipedia. He has the finan-
cial means to do so, then hopefully finally without the
constant begging for donations. From then on, it will be:
“Elon is watching you (trust me, I am pure objectivity).”
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/oct/25/ai-models-may-be-developing-their-own-survival-drive-researchers-say
ps. “Count” Kessler
As far as I can tell, the 57 years’ worth of diaries—supposedly the largest contemporary diary collection—kept by this so-called “count” are little more than the pseudo-intellectual ramblings of a gay pseudo-aristocrat, whose sole purpose in life was to mingle with high society, indulge in idleness, and frivolously squander his father’s enormous fortune.
Today, he’s regarded as a luminary, though he died alone in the end. He supposedly knew everyone, but no one really knew him in return. He represents a typical hedonist and nihilist, lacking both purpose and any right to exist.
That he glorified the decadent period of the 1920s and dismissed the Nazis as a bunch of culturally barren plebeians is hardly surprising—after all, it was precisely types like him who were identified as chiefly responsible for the downfall of German culture. There is an air of presumptuous arrogance, self-importance, snobbery, and class conceit that runs throughout.
https://archive.is/0ksLD
https://archive.is/nSs9B
Biography & translations by Easton, who also
appears in the documentary film (only in Ger-
man), are compiled as PDFs in link collection.
https://linkmix.co/46385545
https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/educational-magazines/easton-laird-m-1956
Life is full of surprises. But are they really “surprises,” or
are they actually confirmations of our basic assumptions?
Hold on to your hats: the translator of Count Kessler’s dia-
ries is a convicted pedophile! AI has confirmed my research.
https://krcrtv.com/news/local/chico-state-professor-charged-with-child-porn-possession
Once: “Learn to suffer without complaining.”
Now: “Learn to complain without suffering.”
That is a very, very good comment. I am always struck by the contrast of the view people once had of personal suffering; i.e, that it was a test from God to determine whether or nor the sufferer was worthy of the Kingdom of Heaven. In a novel I once read that was written sometime in the 1850s, the protagonist earnestly prayed for “resignation” when beset by onerous personal trials, rather than praying for deliverance from the suffering.
It’s funny how the same people who condemn “blood and soil” patriotism are so quick to use it for the Indians when they turn around and hate America and tell us it doesn’t belong to us because it’s “stolen from the Indians.”
” it was a test from God to determine whether or nor the sufferer was worthy ”
Nice theological evasion.
More cheap plaster to cover cracks in a failing foundation.
The decisive factor is not how many percent of Jews are involved in such demolitions, but that at the decisive moment, individuals in key positions flip the switch or press the button. Like the proverbial butterfly that triggers a tornado. One could also speak of a domino effect, or an avalanche effect, which begins with a simple snowball.
An avalanche is “set in motion.” A single arsonist is enough to start a wildfire. The same is true in racial matters. A crack in the dam is enough to cause it to burst. Everything else follows in its wake. We haven’t even talked about all the other accompanying phenomena, such as the propaganda for racial mixing by Jewish porn platforms.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/all-wars-are-based-lies-libertarian-and-renowned-historian-face-world-war-ii
This “veteran” is a nasty racist in disguise!
Lost Empire, LGBTQ+, and white genocide
were definitely worth defeating Germany!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tv/article-15268525/world-war-two-veteran-gmb-adil-ray-kate-garraway.html
https://www.amren.com/videos/2025/10/a-truly-inspiring-weekend/
Truly inspiring…
https://vanguardecho.com/a-snake-in-the-grass-the-orwoll-grift-exposed-d7e81d22adbb
I smelled a rat when I discovered the Lügenpresse were invited to the place … that overwhelming reek of the spiritual entity worshipped day and night by the Synagogue of Satan. Inviting the gaslight media to anything worthwhile is like inviting Jeffrey Epstein to teach a Sunday School class. The rotten apples never fall very far from the putrid tree, regardless of what they say.
Very apt description, best regards!
What is your vision for North America Mr. griffin? Is it a Blood-and-Soil Vision or something other? Enquiring mind’s want a clear expositive of your North America.
https://anncoulter.com/2025/11/06/dont-let-the-brits-read-the-new-york-times1/
My question to AI:
Germans find it puzzling why Americans love the British accent. Apart from them, no one else in the world does. I don’t like British English at all: it either sounds stilted (i.e., pseudo-aristocratic) or plebeian. Quite apart from the fact that I don’t like snobbish Brits on principle, but that’s another matter.
Interestingly, in Germany it’s exactly the opposite: artificial High German considers natural Low German to be inferior and provincial.
Americans should develop more pride in their own language variation instead of helping the British become even more arrogant. Presumably, they associate British English with Shakespeare and the “golden age of the Empire,” or how else can this be explained? Probably, due to their rootlessness, they consider these weird islands to be their “origin.”
AI’s reply:
Your reflection touches on several key points of linguistic perception and cultural psychology. The American fascination with British English is deeply tied to historical, cultural, and aesthetic associations rather than linguistic merit alone.
In the U.S., the British accent—particularly Received Pronunciation (RP)—has long been coded as authoritative, educated, and refined. Hollywood reinforced this by assigning British voices to intellectual or aristocratic characters. To many Americans, RP evokes Shakespeare, Oxford, and the English Enlightenment—the “birthplace” of modern Western thought and literature. It’s not so much about the British Empire as the imagery of heritage and legitimacy.
In Germany, the situation is indeed inverted. Standard High German (Hochdeutsch) has an artificial quality since it evolved as a written standard, not a native vernacular. Regional dialects like Low German or Bavarian are often dismissed as rustic or uncultured, echoing a similar sociolinguistic hierarchy—but with reversed emotional weight.
Your observation that Americans should embrace their own linguistic identity has weight. American English—with its regional flavors, innovations, and global influence—is arguably the true contemporary standard. It’s dynamic, expressive, and unburdened by class connotations in the way British accents still are.
In short, the love for the British accent among Americans reflects less about Britain itself and more about an unconscious search for lineage and validation—what you aptly call an attachment to “origin.”
My question to AI:
Why was Germany, in contrast to England or France, never conquered by Vikings, apart from a few ridiculous attempts?
AI answers:
Germany was never fully conquered by the Vikings, in contrast to England or France, due to a combination of strong political organization, formidable defenses, and less attractive economic targets. While Vikings did carry out raids in parts of what is now Germany—such as sacking cities like Cologne and Aachen—these raids were sporadic and limited in scope compared to the more substantial and sustained invasions in England and France.
Defensive Strengths and Organization
The Germanic regions, especially those under the Carolingian Empire and later the Holy Roman Empire, were generally more politically centralized and militarily organized than early-medieval England or France. The construction of defensive works such as the Danevirke, a series of fortifications in what is today northern Germany and southern Denmark, helped protect against incursions from the north. Additionally, the Carolingian military machine was often prepared to mobilize large forces quickly, deterring many larger-scale Viking invasions.
Economic and Geographic Factors
Unlike the wealthy coastal monasteries and towns of England and France, many areas of inland Germany were less attractive to opportunistic Viking raiders. The richest cities were located deeper inland, making riverine raids more difficult and risky due to the need to penetrate better-defended territories. Moreover, the region had fewer accessible coastal targets, and when the Vikings attempted inland raids via rivers such as the Rhine, they encountered stiff resistance and fortified towns.
Political and Social Differences
At the height of Viking activity, England and the Frankish territories (France) were often divided into smaller, rival kingdoms or principalities, making them easier targets for concerted assaults, occupation, and even settlement. By contrast, during the Carolingian era, much of present-day Germany was part of a unified and aggressive empire, which not only deterred attacks but at times also retaliated against Viking threats.
Viking Activities in Germany
While not completely absent, Viking activity in Germany was characterized by raids rather than conquest. Cities like Trier and Cologne were attacked and occasionally devastated, but the lack of political fragmentation and strong defensive measures prevented these from developing into occupation or long-term Viking settlements, unlike what occurred in Normandy or eastern England.
In summary, Germany was not “immune” to Viking raids, but its relative unity, defensive preparations, and less enticing economic targets meant it was never conquered or settled by Vikings the same way as England or France.
My next question:
What lessons can be learned from this for today’s nation states, which are trying to preserve their identity in the face of the onslaught of “globalism”?
AI replies:
Modern nation states can draw several lessons from medieval Germany’s experience with Viking threats in their efforts to preserve national identity amid global pressures. Key takeaways focus on unity, strong defensive structures, adaptability, and clear institutional memory.
Unity and Central Organization
Medieval Germany’s relative political unity and capacity for rapid, collective response were crucial in resisting Viking conquest. Modern states facing the challenge of globalization may similarly benefit from cohesive institutions and a sense of shared purpose, which help strengthen internal resilience and prevent fragmentation.
Defensive Infrastructure
Germany’s investment in fortifications—walls, watchtowers, and strategic town planning—helped deter or repel Viking attacks. Today, defending against “globalism” may require robust protective mechanisms, such as strong cultural, legal, and economic barriers that filter and manage foreign influences while preserving core traditions.
Adaptability and Innovation
The ability to learn from threats and continually innovate defensive measures helped medieval societies survive. This included adopting and adapting enemy tactics and fortification techniques. Modern countries can adapt by selectively integrating helpful global trends while carefully maintaining distinct aspects of their identity and institutions.
Institutional Memory and Preparedness
Maintaining a clear, shared memory of previous threats and institutionalizing lessons learned—such as Germany’s historical town defenses—proves critical for long-term survival. Today, national education and cultural institutions can play a similar role in reminding societies of their history and the importance of preserving unique identities within a global context.
These lessons highlight the enduring value of unity, strong and adaptable defense, and a well-preserved sense of identity in the face of external pressures, whether military or cultural.
British accent , effete pretentious snobbery.
How did Robert Fithen (who makes the perfect friend) end up philosophizing about his missing foreskin at the northern tip of Lower Saxony?
Quite simply: he is an original Aquarius! This means that his intuition led him to his place of origin, namely where the Saxons conquered England.
The name Fithen is a very old English one, there is also the German equivalent Fiethen. Incidentally, Cux should be pronounced Cooks, not Cocks.
Cuxhaven is also a special place from which most German (unfortunately for America and the world in general also Jewish) immigrants set sail.
Well, our “Robbie” acted kinda little silly at the end, but in truth he knows that he found a cheap place to stay that was “structurally unfinished.”
Germans love such white Americans and would even marry their daughters to them! You have no idea how well-meaning their are toward them!
Their “language” sounds “English,” but it is veiled to the speakers themselves; in reality, it is an experiment in adapting English to continental Europe.
Back to the Jews, who are currently a “nose length” ahead in the race for adaptability. They label their toxic content with surnames that sound “familiar”.
Hey, Everyone:
I came to this board, after I found out I had a paternal ancestor who ended up fighting with the Confederates after being drafted by the Union near the end of the War Between The States. Totally by happenstance. When the smoke from musket fire had cleared. He found what he thought was another Union troop only to learn his mistake once he saw their battle flag. By then the Confederates were in such dire straits, they were stripping Union dead of everything to keep their own bodies and souls together. Terrifed that he wouldn’t survive as a POW of the South under these circumstances, he only spoke French and everyone assumed he was Louisiana French. He fought with them until he could make his way back to the Union.
From this board, I got not only the sense of how the Founding Stock American in the South thinks but how much more rooted they seem to Great Britain than their counterparts I met while I lived in New England. How such a stark difference from such a small island country is possible is odd, but interesting.
In any case, I found and subscribed to a Youtube Channel called Celtainian Chronicles which mainly deals with the countries that compose Great Britain, but also delves into some other countries, etc. And, all I can do is salute what an amazing history Great Britain has which is why only their colonists could so successfuly create this country.
On a slightly different note, I stumbled on this debate between two Black people; a Jamaican woman who had lived here for some time and a new Black African immigrant whose view was that the Founding Stock should stay in the majority and in charge of the country, but anyone not of Founding Stock (and that would include this French-Polish hybrid) are “guests who should not take over the house,” but either assimilate or self-segregate into their own versions of Chinatown. Link here, for those who are curious.
Heinz, many Americans do in fact have British heritage. That is why. You seem to enjoy going after British people a lot. This site has allowed everyone to let loose on the inter ethnic squabbling which I support, but in this movement in general, this stuff is very one sided. Attacking other whites is generally off limits unless they are Protestant and from the British Isles. I understand the reasoning for some of it, but it becomes gratuitous after a while.
As for Colin Woodard, his vision is the same old BS which is spouted endlessly by various conserviltard clowns. He’s either a shameless liar or literally retarded. As for J. D. “Vance” he’s no more of a “blood and soil” guy than Woodard or the other cucks – including Mr. Crunchy Cuck himself Rod Dreher.
Dreher just got totally eviscerated by Vox Day and even looks like a Southerner named John Slaughter has now caught on to the complete racket that “conservatism” has been since William F. Cuckley slid in to gatekeep for all of the usual suspects (70 + years ago). At the end of the day, “conservatism” failed to conserve anything at all, not even the ladies’ room. Refreshing to see some folks waking up to reality. Long overdue.