Donald Trump Renews Attacks On Thomas Massie

Obviously, I can’t vote for Thomas Massie, but I will be skipping the Republican primary in Alabama on Tuesday. I won’t be voting for any “Trump endorsed candidates” in the primary or in the general election in November. This will be my first opportunity since all of this started to stop voting.

About Hunter Wallace 12452 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

18 Comments

  1. 5 dollar gas isn’t the largest consequence of this Israeli forced idiocy, the largest will be an economic rupture. The Treasury market started to crack Friday. If that crack spreads it will cause surging interest rates and tumbling markets.

    • AOC is a liberal Zionist aligned with J-Street, a more moderate version of AIPAC for liberal Democrats.

      Only 6 congressmen voted against ALL military foreign aid for Israel:
      Republicans Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massie
      Democrats Summer Lee, Al Greene, Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar

      MTG quit, and the Democrats are abysmal, which leaves only ONE congressman who even comes close to representing the interests of the American people.

      • @WU,

        MTG is now a dual citizen…..of Costa Rica. She went from 90,000 per year to 23 million her last year in Congress before now. It might be double as of today. She went and bought a rural Costa Rican estate and plans to live as a planet trotting, “The View” guest speaking, Planet trotting Papist Global citizen. So, there’s your sign. Massie will probably join her and her new husband as the manage trois in third world living Western diabochery. Typical lying decieving decedant Papists.

        • Who says that crime doesn’t pay? It pays damned well. Your heroes Lutnick, Soros and others of the master race all live like hermit monks of course.

        • @mischling globalist bro

          “MTG is now a dual citizen…..of Costa Rica”

          Sorry, schlomo, but this mere speculation on your part and on the part of your fellow zionist dual-loyalist, Ms. Jigsaw herself, larry loomer. Come back when you have some actual facts to report, mischling.

  2. Only a small part of the Epstein Files were released, and no one talks about the details anymore. Massie somehow got those three hens to vote with him for the discarge petition, so it passed. 33 Hours Patel released some things incriminating about Trump, or his staff did. Was that incompetence?

    Now Zog is pumping the futures prices up again, just like I knew they would. At least one more pump and dump. There is now developing a new glut of oil on the market, an oversupply, but the Goyim don’t know, are fooled by the hoax, even worse than during the Covid hoax.

    Whoever is handling Trump’s Social Media posts is not doing him any good. It is an embarrassment. Probably Kushner, who is the actual co-President beside Netanyahoo.

    Win or lose Tuesday, Massie remains the most popular politician in America. That gives him juice for a 2028 Presidential run, but unfortunately the voters do not decide that race, the voting machines do.

    I am a bit ashamed that I only sent Massie $250, but times are hard now in Zogland.

    • The Epstein files are interesting for the amazing number of cohenkidinks that keep on showing up miraculously. Here’s one I never new about, but Donigula did say that his good pal Jeff was one of the luckiest guys around – right up there with Luck Larry of WTC fame.

    • I gave Massie $3500, and I’m planning on doing the same for Mark Lynch.

      What does it matter if I have money or not? We need to take back our country.

      Democrats are evil beyond belief. Therefore we must take the Republican Party. Therefore we must give maximum support to every Republican in the primaries who is good on both foreign policy and immigration.

      If a Republican is good on both foreign policy and immigration, we should give them full support with donations, volunteering, and our votes.

      If a Republican is bad on either foreign policy or immigration, they should get NOTHING – no donation, no volunteering and no vote.

    • @Rangewolf,

      “Win or lose Tuesday, Massie remains the most popular politician in America. That gives him juice for a 2028 Presidential run, but unfortunately the voters do not decide that race, the voting machines do.”

      Massie lost his primary today and decisively. He is less popular than Trump obviously. He has no chance of winning a GOP Presidential nomination. However, his viewpoints like your own are popular among non Whites and Anti-Americans. So perhaps, he can run in the Democrat Party and get votes from you and others at Occidental Democrat. But, he is White, so that’s going to b a problem unless he comes out as a full anti-White like other White politicians in the Democrat Party. I think you guys are screwed multiple times over.

  3. “Bombshell: Hitler escaped to Indonesia!”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czuLwSt8CRk

    This guy’s “work” is a remarkable contribution to the burgeoning field of speculative historiography, a discipline in which the absence of evidence is not a limitation but a licensing agreement.

    His central achievement lies in demonstrating that if one assembles enough unrelated curiosities, rumors, bureaucratic oddities, and emotionally evocative anecdotes, one can indeed construct a narrative that feels impressively comprehensive right up until the moment it is examined by an actual historian.

    He has mastered the art of churning out hours and hours of nonsense. It’s genuinely surprising that Wikipedia refers to him not as a conspiracy theorist, but as an “author.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Levenda

    His interviewer in another video, who is unmistakably Jewish in appearance, claims that Germans are “more pessimistic” due to their extensive use of the past tense in their language (he presumably means as English speakers); I ran this claim through an AI:

    “Michels’ claim is linguistically and conceptually weak. The tense system of a language does not determine the emotional disposition of its speakers, so German grammar cannot be used to infer that Germans are intrinsically more pessimistic than English speakers.

    At most, one could argue that languages differ in how they encode temporal relations, which may influence habitual expression; however, that is very different from claiming a stable cultural psychology. The statement therefore reads less like a serious linguistic observation than a loose cultural stereotype.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7PLeu5rTv4

    https://i.ibb.co/35ywvnF1/ufo.jpg
    https://i.ibb.co/NgvjdvB1/levenda.jpg

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Levitt
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britain_Israel_Communications_and_Research_Centre
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poju_Zabludowicz
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British-American_Project

    Asking AI again:

    1) On Levitt / Fathom / Levenda

    A plausible explanation is that Levitt’s professional interests and the platform’s editorial alignment are compatible enough for the video to be treated as relevant, even if not universally true or authoritative. In other words, an endorsement or recommendation on a politically aligned platform is better read as curated relevance than as a rigorous seal of truth.

    What that means
    – The platform may find Levenda’s material useful because it fits broader themes like secrecy, security, intelligence, and narrative framing.
    – A recommendation does not necessarily mean Levitt agrees with every claim Levenda makes.
    – It also does not prove Levenda is right; it mainly shows that the material is useful inside a particular interpretive and political environment.

    The cautious conclusion
    The strongest reading is that this is a case of thematic and ideological fit, not proof of correctness. It looks less like neutral scholarship and more like selective amplification within a particular network.

    2) On the UFO-archive release as a distraction

    Yes, it is possible that the UFO-archive story is being used as a distraction from other political issues, including the Middle East and Israel-related controversies. But that remains a political interpretation, not a proven fact.

    What supports that suspicion
    – UFO releases generate major media attention.
    – They can crowd out coverage of more immediate political problems.
    – A highly publicized release can function as agenda-setting, whether or not that was the original intent.

    What does not follow
    – The existence of released UFO documents does not by itself prove a “Nazi UFO.”
    – Nor does it prove the release was intentionally staged to hide events in the Middle East.
    – Most of what has been publicly reported appears to be old documentation and image material, not a clean revelation of exotic craft.

    Best summary
    The most defensible position is: yes, distraction is a possible political use of such releases; no, the releases themselves do not establish the more dramatic claims attached to them.

    Yes — from your perspective, that is a very plausible reading. If someone wants to be taken seriously as a terrorism or security expert, a public association with highly speculative, esoteric, or conspiratorial material can easily look like a credibility problem.

    Why it can hurt him
    – It can suggest he is too close to fringe material to keep proper analytical distance.
    – It can make his methodological rigor look weaker, especially if he presents himself as evidence-driven.
    – It can imply that he is comfortable with narrative over proof.
    – In fields like counterterrorism, audiences usually expect a high standard of caution when dealing with speculative or ideologically charged claims.

    The most charitable readings
    There are still a few possible explanations that do not necessarily make him look good:
    – He may simply think the material is interesting, not reliable.
    – He may be operating in a milieu where security, intelligence, and esoteric topics routinely overlap.
    – He may be underestimating how ridiculous or damaging this looks from the outside.
    – Or he may accept the reputational cost because he personally finds the topic compelling.

    Your criticism is strong
    I would agree that, if Levitt depends on being seen as a serious expert, this kind of association looks more damaging than helpful. It does not prove that he is incompetent, but it definitely raises fair questions about judgment and standards.

    Short version for direct use
    If you want a concise formulation:

    If Levitt wants to be taken seriously as a counterterrorism expert, publicly endorsing or promoting material this speculative makes him look less credible, not more. At minimum, it raises questions about his judgment, his methodological standards, and how sharply he distinguishes evidence from narrative.

  4. Not sure why he ran again for President. All he does is shoot himself in the foot. I guess he likes to get shot, or maybe Alzheimers?

  5. Since, as is well known, Hitler had a micropenis according to “highly official findings,” as a converted Muslim he may have had to satisfy his new Indonesian wife with his left hand—which trembled in a robotic, staccato manner due to Parkinson’s disease.

    Or perhaps he skillfully made her squeal with delight using his bristly, unruly toothbrush mustache; this remains one of the most mysterious and sinister puzzles that truth investigator Levenda has not yet been able to fully unravel.

  6. I’m no fan of Gallrein who’s salt of the Earth bullshit bullshit is some of the worst campaigning I have ever seen, this guy had a free ride. It all came down to personal life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*