Mark Levin: Stop Bullying Israel!

10 Comments

1. Yeah, right, Mark Levin is literally dragging Trump back into war, a war started by Israel, by dragging America I to it, because Jews are devils and the Goyim or stupid cattle, and Trump is the stupidest Goyim and Cow in the herd. Literally, only third worldists buy this line if reasoning.

   Note, various polls show a median of 42.5 percent of Americans support the war, including 75% of Republicans. Almost half of Independents support it and nearly 10% of Democrats. That’s as of today after four months of a bungles military operation that rivals Biden’s strategic military ineptitude. The initial phase of fighting was well done but it was a couple of left jabs and then Trump just chumped out like a prize fighter in the take. We’ve been in a cese fire longer than we actually fought. With no end in sight and various pot shots around, everyone is sick of the bullshiite with the Shiites.

   As usual, it’s not that Americans are opposed to fighting a war, they just want it to be fought well for once with a clear objective and strategically sound outcome especially. Trump’s incessent bellicosity followed by TACO is what is getting Republicans locked up in bad positioning for November. Had Trump used overwhelming military force and limited ground operations the straights would be open, the regime would be collapsing, fighting would continue but in Iran, and Trump would be running high on war victory wave. But, he has to many effing millennials in his staff. Idiots all of them.

   Reply

2. Mark Levin doesn’t want Our Greatest Ally getting “bullied” sic by the U.S.

   Mr. Levin has a point. Here’s the deal; the U.S. won’t “bully” sic Our Greatest Ally anymore. They can follow whatever policies they want without comment or restraint from the U.S. Government.

   In return, the U.S. Government will stop supplying munitions, fuel, spare parts, aircraft etc. and most importantly: money, money, money to Our Greatest Ally. They will be on their own, free as a bird to do whatever they want. No more 500 Lb. bombs, millions of gallons of jet and diesel fuel, aircraft, ammunition, vehicles, weapons etc. That’s the other side of the deal, like it or not.

   Good luck to the hypocrites and ingrates. They wouldn’t last much more than a month without the U.S. Their constant complaint is: “yes, but what have you done for me lately?” as they drag the world down into Hell with them.

   Reply

3. “without israel, without the Jewish foundation, there would not be an America. we owe our existence to what happened in this land.”
   Huckabee

   Reply

4. https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2026/06/21/james-edwards-interviews-sascha-rosmuller/

   Sascha now even has his own podcast harem; one of its members goes by Sally Hausfrau. Even he, a reliable family man, couldn’t resist, because his brain was overwhelmingly flooded with flirtation hormones, overriding his ability to make his own decisions.

   https://rumble.com/v7bbm48-sascha-a.-romller.html

   His podcast harem had even gone out of their way to spell his name correctly using a letter not found on English keyboards; such an honor is not always bestowed upon him even in his homeland, since the “bio-Germans” there have largely been replaced by “neo-Germans.”

   In his enthusiasm, Sascha returned the favor with some unique idiomatic quirks, without, however, drawing the ridicule of his tactful listeners: “My son became (instead of got) a cell phone.” No, Sascha, the German word “bekam” doesn’t mean the same thing in English.

   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHgctQSa3HA
   https://rumble.com/v7alpj2-book-review-legal-truthful-guilty.html

   Reply

5. PS: Unlike Sascha, however, I would have behaved—and indeed proceeded—quite differently, trusting that everything—that is, all attitudes, experiences, and so on—would emerge from the conversation itself.

   So I would have spent less time talking about myself, my background, my plans, and so on, and instead tried to build bridges—through questions, but also, for example, by bringing up the topic of German women. That would certainly have interested the ladies more than dry political theorizing.

   Women are usually very bored by dry intellectual theory; you have to engage with them on a personal, emotional level to spark their interest, get them to open up, and win their inner warmth and cooperation. But that’s just how personalities differ. Sascha is just Sascha.

   I’ll give him credit for this—he probably understands “political theory” or even day-to-day politics better than I do, since I’ve never really delved into or grappled with that sort of thing. I’m just not the type for it, and my time is simply too precious to waste on it. I’m also not an “activist” like Martin Sellner, although I have the utmost respect for what he does.

   Reply

6. Unfortunately, many—indeed, most—men are very self-conscious and awkward when dealing with the opposite sex. Why this is so is a mystery to me. The exciting adventure of masculinity lies precisely in the intellectual unraveling of female mysteries.

   One could also say that a man is capable of making sense of a woman’s complex emotions. A woman needs a man as a mirror that reflects her true self, in which she wants to see her character accurately portrayed.

   Reply

7. Imagine you’re missing out on a wonderful opportunity to entertain yourself and others. But you end up boring them because, in truth, you’re a bore who bores even yourself. Is that even conceivable or possible? Unfortunately, all too often. Narrow-minded, narcissistic self-absorption is total anti-wisdom.

   It is, so to speak, utter mediocrity that today presumes to claim “intellectual superiority” over common sense. By what God-given, natural right, exactly? However, the average depends heavily on the overall level of intellectual capacity, and that has definitely declined by a factor of x in recent decades.

   Reply

8. I’m eager to read what Mr. Nirenberg (appa-
   rently a “Yiddish” version for Nürnberg) will
   accuse us—the entire non-Jewish world—of.
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Nirenberg
   https://pdfhost.io/v/4EC2NPTtEF_Nirenberg_-_Anti-Judaism

   Reply

9. Btw, I interpret the illustration on the cover
   of Mr. Nirenberg’s book in a way that’s com-
   pletely different from what he obviously inten-
   ded: “Yes, the sky behind it—that’s freedom!”
   https://i.ibb.co/VpmN6SyV/smashthesystemfreedominsight.jpg

   Reply

10. Women operate on a lower intellectual level,
    which allows them to raise children within a
    small circle but not engage in “world politics.”

    This is not out of malice but simply their
    natural disposition. A guy who believes
    women are his “equals” is, in truth, not
    a man but a clown and a mama’s boy.

    In doing so, he demonstrates his own
    worldly inexperience and degradation.
    (“Intellectual” means also “spiritual.”)

    Reply