My Worldview

Dixie

Editor’s Note: I will continue working throughout the weekend. Keep checking in for updates. The next RFM debate with Alex Linder is about goals, tactics, and strategy.

Our Vision

I’m an ethnonationalist.

I believe that ethnicity is more powerful than race. I want a free and independent Republic of Dixie, an Anglo-Celtic nation-state like Hungary or Poland carved out of the wreckage of the United States, that is based on blood, culture, and history, not on failed liberal abstractions.

There are other separatist movements that fall into the same category: Québec in Canada, Flanders in Belgium, Scotland in the United Kingdom, Catalonia and the Basque Country in Spain, and Padania in Italy. Ireland, Croatia, Norway, Hungary, Greece, and Ukraine have already succeeded in joining the European family of nations.

Like the Catalans or Québécois, Southern Whites are a distinct ethnic group within America. Dixie is a nation within the United States that manifests itself in every presidential election, every major vote in Congress, the U.S. Census, and the maps of cultural geographers.

The Southern States:

Source: Wikipedia

The Southern States (Core and Periphery):

Source: Wikipedia

The Baptists:

Source: U.S. Census

Southern English:

Source: Wikipedia

“Real Americans”:

Source: American Ancestry (2000 Census)

Dixie:

Source: Joel Garreau, The Nine Nations of North America

Dixie Coalition:

Source: Colin Woodard, American Nations

Confederate States of America (1861-1865):

Confederate States of America

Jim Crow South (1896-1965):

Source: JimCrowHistory.org

The Republic of Dixie would include the 11 states of the ex-Confederacy, West Virginia, Kentucky, Oklahoma, and the southern third of Missouri below I-44. In a worst case scenario, we might may have to cede Maryland, the Mexican border counties in Texas, the Washington Metro Area in Northern Virginia, and South Florida.

The international border between the Republic of Dixie and the United States would start at the Atlantic, run under the NOVA counties in Virginia before moving up toward the Shenandoah Valley, it would wrap around West Virginia excluding the Northern Panhandle, follow the Ohio River around Kentucky to Missouri, where it would follow I-44 through Missouri toward Oklahoma before sweeping around the Texas-New Mexico border and down through the Anglo-Hispanic ethnic fault line in South Texas toward the Gulf of Mexico.

The differences between the Republic of Dixie and the White Republic envisioned by the White Nationalists are clear:

– Dixie is a real nation. Southern Whites are a distinct people. This is a place that exists in the real world. It is not an abstraction or a proposition nation. It has a name and already exists in the minds of the people. It is not a vague fantasy that exists only in the minds of alienated intellectuals scattered across a continent.

– Dixie has all the ingredients of an independent nation: a common ethnicity, a common culture, a common ideological outlook, and a common history. White Nationalism is based on a racial identity and racial grievances. Simply put, there is more glue to Southern Nationalism because there is more homogeneity, which means there are fewer areas for conflict and division.

– Dixie has existed as an independent nation in the past: the Confederate States of America. There has been an earthquake along that sectional fault line before which destroyed the Union. It is still to this day the most likely spot where the Union would be cleaved in two.

– Southern Nationalism is a type of European-style ethnonationalism. White Nationalism is a reiteration of Americanism. There has already been at least one White Republic, the United States until 1861, and it failed due to ethnic and cultural divisions among White Americans.

With the exception of Harold Covington, White Nationalists can’t tell you the name of their proposed nation, where it would be located in the real world, what ethnicity would be the basis of their White ethnostate, or how their White Republic would be created. After thirty years of talking about creating a White Republic, you would think these basic questions would have been answered a long time ago.

Golden Dawn, for example, can answer all of these questions in under a minute: Greece, Greece, the Greeks, taking over the government. The Québécois can answer all of those questions: Québec, Québec, the Québécois, taking over the government and seceding from Canada. The Catalans have the same answers: Catalonia, Catalonia, the Catalans, taking over the government and seceding from Spain.

What about Southern Nationalists? We have the same answers as the Scots, Québécois, the Greeks, and the Catalans: Dixie, Dixie, taking over the Southern states, seceding from the Union, and creating the Republic of Dixie.

Our Strategy – Working Within The System

I will say at the outset that we believe reforming the system is impossible.

In the United States, we live under a system of representative government. Southern Nationalists have no objection in principle to the system of representative government – it works in homogeneous countries, but doesn’t work in heterogeneous ones. America is a failure as a nation and there is no political solution but secession and independence to that problem.

Americans no longer share a common race, a common ethnicity, a common culture, a common religion, a common history, or a common philosophical worldview. As America becomes ever more “diverse,” we are finding out that we have ever less in common with other “Americans,” and truth be told, if this were a marriage, we would have gotten divorced a long time ago.

White Southerners are a permanent minority in this Union. We are a permanent minority in a system based on majority rule. In 2008 and 2012, White Southerners voted against Barack Obama in overwhelming numbers, but Obama’s election and reelection only proved the futility of trying to reform a system in which we are a hopelessly outnumbered ethnic and cultural minority.

The consolidated despotism that we are living under today under Obama will only get worse under his successors as changing racial and cultural demographics continue to erode our political power. Obama’s election has proven that Democrats can write off Southern Whites and still win the White House. The Democratic media no longer even tries to hide its racial and cultural contempt for White Southerners.

So what are our options?

The first option is submission. We can submit to being ruled indefinitely by a coalition of Yankees and Jews and “people of color.” We can lose our freedom. We can lose our culture. In the long run, we can allow this “majority” of racial, ethnic, and cultural aliens to plunder us of everything we own.

The second option is self delusion. We can delude ourselves into believing that everything will be fine and that we can run Marco Rubio in 2016 and win over legions of budding “black conservatives” and “Hispanic conservatives.” The unprecedented level of moral cowardice on display at sites like RedState.com ensures that self delusion will win the day for at least one more election cycle.

The third option is secession. We can seize power in the Southern states, secede from the Union, and form our own nation-state, the Republic of Dixie. In this scenario, we will have a fighting chance to preserve our way of life, and there is already movement in this direction in Texas and the rest of Dixie.

The fourth option is revolution. If our backs are firmly pressed against the wall, armed revolution might become the only realistic way to preserve our way of life. See the White Man’s Revolution of 1876 in South Carolina.

The fifth option is emigration. We can move to some other country. Don’t make me laugh with suggestions of moving to the Pacific Northwest. The same despotism that exists here can be found there as well. If Mississippi or Alabama can’t be pushed to resistance, there is no hope at all for Washington or Oregon.

Secession is our first choice.

We want to peacefully secede from the United States like Ukraine and Georgia seceded from the Soviet Union or Czechoslovakia broke apart in the Velvet Divorce. In Great Britain and Canada, Scotland and Québec have been given referendums to secede, Puerto Rico recently had a referendum on joining the United States, and Catalonia will soon be holding a referendum on secession from Spain.

In order to bring about disunion, we are supportive of “working within the system” – by that we mean at the state level, and only within the South – in order to exacerbate sectional polarization, galvanize our supporters, and advance the cause of secession with the ultimate objective in mind of calling a state convention in every Southern state to vote on the dissolution of this Union.

As we have already seen, our fellow disunionists in Europe and Canada are “working within the system” and they are way ahead of us: the Parti Québécois in Québec, the Scottish National Party in Scotland, the Convergence and Union Party (CiU) in Catalonia, Golden Dawn in Greece, and Vlaams Belang in Belgium.

In the United States, we don’t have a parliamentary system of government and couldn’t hope to reproduce those results with a third party in the South, but it might be possible for Southern Whites to imitate and invert the racial and ideological solidarity of the blacks and Hispanics within the Democratic Party and form a Southern Nationalist Caucus within the Republican Party in the Southern state legislatures.

The future of the Republican Party is unclear at this moment. Whatever its fate, the goal of the Southern Nationalist Caucus should be to split the Republican Party along sectional lines to precipitate the dissolution of the Union. Now that the GOP is pretty much dead as a viable national party, I imagine this will become more feasible moving forward.

Our Strategy – Christianity and Conservatism

Southern Nationalists are “mainstreamers.”

By that I mean our strategy is based on winning over our own people to the cause of secession or closing the gap between the Southern Nationalist vanguard and the White Southern masses until the need to secede from this despotic government becomes so obvious that it is accepted as common sense.

In this area, we are counting on the fecklessness of Conservatism, Inc., the failure of the Tea Party to “Take Back America,” the impotence of the national GOP, and the triumphalism and hubris of the minority-majority and their cheerleaders in the mainstream media to disillusion and alienate the average White Southern male and thereby sow the seeds of disunion.

We are under no illusions that the South is going to cease to be Christian and conservative and embrace White Nationalism and atheism after rejecting the values it has held for almost four centuries.

It is conceivable though that Southerners might be provoked to revolt in defense of the Southern way of life: a conservative revolution like the one in the video below against a hated, despotic central government and the economic ruin and godless, degenerate Northeastern culture that it seeks to impose on Dixie through its abuse of federal power.

As White Southerners lose power at the national level, they will predictably seek empowerment at the state level. When it finally becomes clear that White Southerners have permanently lost power within the minority-majority United States, the allure of White male empowerment through secession will become an irresistible temptation.

Alex Linder has proposed attacking the Christians and conservatives. While nothing would give Southern Nationalists greater pleasure than witnessing the demise of bloodsucking parasites like Conservatism Inc. and the Republican Party or the hucksters who are destroying the Southern Christianity, who we agree can and should be attacked, the following demographic facts must be kept in mind:

Self-Identified Ideology By State

Conservatives are predominant in every Southern state. These numbers also mask the true level of White Southern conservatism by including blacks and Hispanics in the poll:

Mississippi – 53.4%
Alabama – 49.8%
Louisiana – 49.5%
Arkansas – 47.9%
Oklahoma – 47.4%
Tennessee – 45.5%
Texas – 44.8%
West Virginia – 44.6%
South Carolina – 44.6%
Georgia – 43.9%
Missouri – 43.5%
North Carolina – 43.2%
Kentucky – 42.7%
Virginia – 41.3%
Florida – 39.9%

There is no road to secession or revolution in Dixie that doesn’t go through winning over the conservative majority.

Religiosity By State

I shouldn’t have to explain why attacking Christianity and making atheism a litmus test is a non-starter in the Bible Belt. These numbers also mask the true level of White Southern religiosity by including blacks and Hispanics in the poll:

Mississippi – 59% (very religious), 11% (non-religious)
Alabama – 56% (very religious), 16% (non-religious)
Louisiana – 54% (very religious), 16% (non-religious)
Arkansas – 54% (very religious), 19% (non-religious)
South Carolina – 54% (very religious), 18% (non-religious)
Tennessee – 52% (very religious), 18% (non-religious)
North Carolina – 50% (very religious), 21% (non-religious)
Georgia – 48% (very religious), 20% (non-religious)
Oklahoma – 48% (very religious), 23% (non-religious)
Texas – 47% (very religious), 22% (non-religious)
Kentucky – 47% (very religious), 24% (non-religious)
Missouri – 44% (very religious), 28% (non-religious)
West Virginia – 43% (very religious), 26% (non-religious)
Virginia – 42% (very religious), 27% (non-religious)
Florida – 39% (very religious), 31% (non-religious)

There is no path to secession or revolution in Dixie either that doesn’t go straight through the “very religious” and “moderately religious” who make up the Republican base.

Is it even desirable to encourage atheism? In Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida, 64% of voters64% of voters, and 72% of voters respectively who “never” attend religious services voted for Obama.

In Wisconsin, 71% of White atheists voted for Obama. In Ohio, 62% of White atheists voted for Obama. In Michigan, 76% of White atheists voted for Obama. In Pennsylvania, 68% of White atheists voted for Obama.

In the 2012 election, Barack Obama won 69% of the Jewish vote and 70% of the “religiously unaffiliated” nationwide. If the goal is to transform Whites into Jews, then obviously promoting atheism is the way to go because there is no measurable difference between Jewish and White atheist political preferences.

Our Strategy – The Message

Southern Nationalists are ethnonationalists who seek a free and independent Dixie.

We have already established the importance of working within the system (like our counterparts in Canada, Belgium, Spain, and the UK) to dissolve the Union. We have established that secession requires winning over Christians and conservatives. We have established the importance of closing the gap between the Southern Nationalist vanguard and the Southern White masses.

In order to succeed, we will need a simple winning message that resonates with our target audience. I think the message should be that Christianity and conservatism are doomed within the United States, we live under a totally consolidated and unrepresentative federal government with unlimited powers, and the preservation of the Union puts us on a fiscally unsustainable course that will inevitably destroy our economy.

The South should be encouraged to revolt in defense of its own values and prosperity. It must be convinced that secession is the only way to preserve the Southern way of life and actualize those values.

In Catalonia, Catalan secessionists have a simple message that the newly rebranded OD will be experimenting with next year: seceding from Spain is necessary to preserve Catalan culture and Madrid has mismanaged Catalonia’s economy by taxing productive Catalans and redistributing their wealth to indolent Andalusians.

It is already clear that fiscal considerations over America’s soaring national debt and unsustainable government programs – such as the “takers” who got the “Obama phone” from the taxes of the “makers” – are weighing heavily on the minds of the White Southerners who are flirting with secession. We need to spend a lot more time responding to these cultural and economic anxieties.

Our Strategy – Talking Points

The Southern Nationalist message relies heavily on our most valuable asset: the unvarnished truth.

We don’t have the money of Conservatism Inc. or the media to contest the White House, but we can give White Southerners an honest assessment of their situation, we can prod them to revolt in defense of their own self avowed values, and we can excite their imaginations with the tantalizing possibility of how empowering it would be to follow their values to their logical conclusion and to assert their right to rid themselves of the ruling class in Washington.

Here are some talking points that advance this message:

1.) We agree with Ron Paul that the Constitution has failed and the federal government has become a consolidated despotism.

2.) Secession is the ultimate check on the growth of the federal government.

3.) America has failed as a nation. There is no political cure for a decompiled culture.

4.) White Southerners are an object of ridicule in America’s national culture. See “Django Unchained,” “Rosewood,” “Mississippi Burning,” “Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter,” “Lincoln,” and “Deliverance.”

5.) White Southerners are a degraded and humiliated minority within this Union. See the Susan Rice nomination in which the Democratic media recently told White Southern men that it wasn’t their place to question an African-American women.

6.) Christianity has no future in the United States.

7.) Conservatives tried to “Take Back America” and failed. Dixie is not synonymous with America.

8.) Conservatism is dead in America except as a regional philosophy.

9.) America has promoted secession everywhere from South Vietnam, South Korea, South Sudan, Kosovo, Austria, Taiwan, Ukraine, Georgia, the Baltic States, Panama, East Timor, and Ireland to advance its own interests.

10.) America is becoming California. The financial collapse of California will herald the financial collapse of the United States.

11.) The blacks were given their chance. We tried for fifty years to create a “post-racial, colorblind society.” Obama’s reelection on the basis of ZANU-PF-style explicit appeals to class warfare and racial tribalism have closed the book on “MLK’s Dream” and replaced it with “Get Whitey.”

12.) We waged a “War on Poverty” for 50 years and poverty whipped us.

13.) China hasn’t used violence against Taiwan. Russia hasn’t used violence against Ukraine and Georgia. Even North Korea has restrained itself from attacking South Korea. The United States should live up to the standards of North Korea and allow Texas to peacefully secede from the Union.

14.) If you can’t leave, you aren’t free.

15.) The United States is anti-White and anti-Southern.

These are just a few examples that immediately come to mind. Every single one of these talking points has the benefit of being true. The goal of our strategy is to hammer away at these talking points until they are accepted as common sense and disunion is accepted as the only way to preserve the Southern way of life.

Our Strategy – Metapolitics

Southern Nationalists have no objection to “metapolitics.”

Unlike White Nationalists, Southern Nationalists can point to multiple successful examples of just such a metapolitical struggle in the Lower South:

“This idea, though not incorporated in the constitution, was the prevailing idea at that time. The constitution, it is true, secured every essential guarantee to the institution while it should last, and hence no argument can be justly urged against the constitutional guarantees thus secured, because of the common sentiment of the day. Those ideas, however, were fundamentally wrong. They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the “storm came and the wind blew.”

Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner- stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth. This truth has been slow in the process of its development, like all other truths in the various departments of science. It has been so even amongst us. Many who hear me, perhaps, can recollect well, that this truth was not generally admitted, even within their day. The errors of the past generation still clung to many as late as twenty years ago.”
– Alexander Stephens, Cornerstone Speech, March 21, 1861

There is a myth on the internet based largely on stereotypes and ignorance that the South is anti-intellectual or completely devoid of an intellectual culture. In reality, the Union was shattered precisely on the finer points of Stephen Douglas’s abstract constitutional theory of squatter sovereignty, and men like Jefferson Davis and Alexander Stephens left behind huge constitutional treatises for posterity.

Even beyond Jefferson Davis and Alexander Stephens, these issues were hashed out by the secessionist vanguard in journals like the Southern Quarterly Review, the Southern Literary Messenger, and DeBow’s Review for a decade prior to secession and these ideas were circulated to the masses at the popular level in broadsides in newspapers like the Spirit of the South or Rhett’s Charleston Mercury.

OD spotlighted a fraction of this material during Confederate History Month 2012:

“The hour of that hybrid thing, a democratic republic, for the government of two different races, has passed away forever, and we must now direct our attention to those ethnological facts, from out of which the next government is to flow. …

“The peculiar form of government, under which we have for many years been living – call it by what name we may, whether a democracy or a republic – has been well calculated to demoralize, to some extent, the native, high character, of the South, and to vitiate its progress in statesmanship. There has been too much individual freedom, license rather, conferred upon the masses, through the agency of which fact, the lighter and less worthy material of society has floated to the surface. Men of actual merit, who are generally less adapted to popular approbation, have been compelled to come with their opinions and claims before the same volatile tribunal, with the worthless and flippant demagogue; and they, too, as far as was possible for them to do so, have been compelled to resort to the same vitiated means of success.”

In my reviews of Elizabeth Varon’s Disunion! The Coming of the American Civil War, 1789-1859, Paul Quigley’s Shifting Grounds: Nationalism & the American South, 1848-1865, and William Freehling’s The Road to Disunion, Secessionists Triumphant, 1854-1861, I discussed the success of the Confederacy’s “metapolitical revolution” in the 1850s from the eclipse of American nationalism in the Lower South to the emergence of Southern ethnonationalism in the 1850s to the hardening of racial attitudes mentioned by Alexander Stephens and to John C. Calhoun’s absolutely pivotal “mainstreaming” of secession and the compact theory of government in the 1830s and 1840s.

These issues are discussed in great detail in books like Drew Gilpin Faust’s A Sacred Circle: The Dilemma of the Intellectual in the Old South, 1840-1860 and Michael O’Brien’s massive Conjectures of Order: Intellectual Life in the American South, 1840 to 1860.

The ethnocultural division between Southern Whites and Yankees, which I described at the outset of this essay, was pioneered and discussed in elaborate detail in the years leading up to the War Between the States in articles like “Southern Civilization, or the Norman in America”:

“But the Roundhead, at once a religious fanatic and a political agitator and reformer, could conceive of no government but the rule of the Saints, and form no other idea of the principles of civil liberty than what the levelling philosophy of the covenant taught. A bigot in faith and an idealist in speculation, his sentiments were violent and his convictions impracticable. A visionary from principle and a revolutionist from interest, his prejudices allowed no compromise, while his passions fed equally the flame of his cupidity and ambition. Austere in his morals and inflexible in his principles, he set up his own conduct as the standard of right, and sought to dictate the opinions and control the convictions of others. Rude in his manners and morose in his disposition, he practiced the profoundest dissimulation, while attaining credit for sincerity, and concealed his real character and designs under the cloak of hypocrisy. . . .

Opposite under the banner of the king, stood the Cavalier – the builder, the social architect, the institutionalist, the conservator – the advocate of rational liberty and the supporter of authority, as against the licentiousness and morbid impulse of unregulated passion and unenlightened sentiment. No idealist, enthusiast or speculative system-builder, upheaving ancient landmarks and overthrowing venerable monuments; but a realist, a practical and enlightened utilitarian, bowing to the authority of experience and acknowledging the supremacy of ideas, forms and institutions that had received the hallowing sanction of time . An institutor by genius and a ruler by race, his pride was at once the sword of his most eminent virtues and greatest weaknesses, while honor was the touchstone of his character. Chivalrous in sentiment and magnanimous in deed, glory was his ambition, and loyalty the inspirer of his every thought, impulse and action. Elevated in his ideas and tolerant in his views, his selfishness was vicarious and his very faults wore the semblance of virtue. Unyielding in his principles, but compromising in his opinions, his conduct was governed more by sentiment than reflection, and more by association than either. Courtly in his manners and splendid in his tastes, a knightly generosity he practiced even toward his foes, and never lost his faculties in volumptuousness. Without being an abject advocate of passive obedience or a supporter of arbitrary power, he yet took ground against the revolutionary party, not as an enemy to liberal institutions or a well-regulated liberty: but, discovering in the doctrines and principles of the revolution a greater danger to the social and political system than from the alleged existing abuses, he preferred yielding his loyalty rather to institutions than abstractions, and felt it a duty to attempt to quench the lights of the incendiary philosophy, whose torch had been applied to the noblest monuments of civil wisdom yet erected by the genius of man …”

Southern Nationalists have a great advantage in the area of metapolitics. Ultimately, all we are doing is reacquainting White Southern conservatives with their own tradition and cultural inheritance, the Cavalier ideal, which unconsciously informs their value system and actions anyway, and encouraging them to assert that ideal by sending secessionists to their state legislatures.

Our Strategy – Dealing With The Blacks and Hispanics

An astute commentator at VNN Forum made a comment that is worthy of a formal response in this essay: “Qui gehennam habet hostium cum mediocris ingeni quotientem LXXXV?”

[Who the heck has enemies with an average I.Q. of 85?]

Southern Nationalists agree that blacks are not our real political enemies. The existence of the Union with Yankees is solely responsible for the creation and preservation of Black Run Amerika (BRA).

Secession will solve the problem by eliminating the Yankees and Jews who are responsible for artificially elevating blacks over Southern Whites in Dixie. It eliminates all the Northern Whites who voted for Obama twice, who voted for all the civil rights laws, the federal courts that imposed integration on the South and which obstruct the legislative process, the federal controlled public school system which inculcates White guilt, Eric “My People” Holder’s Justice Department, etc.

The race question with African-Americans and Hispanics can and should be subordinated to the priority of secession and securing our independence. In an independent South, the Northeastern media will be unable to maintain BRA’s racial etiquette, which will crumble like communism in the dying Soviet Union, and the blacks will be held accountable for their actions without Yankee-spearheaded federal obstruction.

In dealing with the blacks, Southern Nationalists should be practical and focused on the immediate priority of independence: in an independent South, the blacks will be allowed to keep their voting rights and their civil rights, Russian and Chinese international observers will be invited to Dixie to supervise the fairness of our elections, but BRA will be dismantled brick by brick, racial preferences will be eliminated, and power will be restored to the states and local communities to make their own laws … including restrictive covenants.

The solution to the Negro Question in Dixie isn’t a radical proposal: all we have to do is encourage the conservatives and libertarians to act on their own ideas, which is to say, secede from the hated “Big Government,” and with a solid rightwing majority in the Republic of Dixie, they should be encouraged to decapitate the Great Society welfare state and create the free market paradise of their dreams.

Just imagine it: the year is 2025, and every “Black Confederate” is confronted by the sight of the Confederate flag waving in triumph at every public building in the Republic of Dixie. Five years ago, The Day The EBT Card Quit Working unfolded in Atlanta and there was a mass exodus of blacks from every major city and county in the South which diluted their electoral majorities.

The White conservatives who have an iron grip on the Confederate government didn’t stop with the SNAP EBT card when they seized power. They voted to eliminate the whole Geography of Government Benefits: WIC, TANF welfare, Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, Obama phones, Section 8 housing, energy assistance, “fair housing laws,” disability benefits, federal funding for HBCUs, affirmative action, “disparate impact,” most forms of public transportation, etc.

Even the Post Office was privatized. The Confederate government and the state and local governments of the Republic of Dixie have laid off thousands of government workers. They passed a slew of regressive taxes. They disenfranchised all convicted felons and passed stringent federal and state Voter ID laws.

As in the Jim Crow era from 1896 to 1965, the relative differences in social status, economic opportunities, and future prospects precipitated a mass exodus of African-Americans from the Republic of Dixie to the United States, which responded to Southern secession by creating an even larger and more generous welfare state that was infinitely more attractive to “people of color.”

After the Union was dissolved, the Confederate Congress pounced and quickly repealed the Immigration Act of 1965, while the remainder of the United States (now monolithically controlled by the Democratic Party) passed the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2020 to encourage Somalians and other types of exotic Africans to move to hideously White enclaves like Minnesota and Maine.

At the state level, the Southern states began passing ever more stringent types of Alabama-style immigration laws and E-Verify laws, which made life a living hell for illegal aliens. Without access to the federal courts and a friendly Justice Department, the Southern states began passing laws that made it illegal to rent housing to illegal aliens and for public utilities to provide them with electric service and running water.

A huge fence was built on the Texas border which has been decried by Mexico and other Latin American countries as the “Great Wall of Dixie.” Most of the illegal aliens now crossing into the Republic of Dixie are White Midwesterners who brave the Ohio River in a desperate bid to escape the onerous taxation of the United States in the sanctuary cities of Kentucky and West Virginia.

Does this get us all the way to a White Southern ethnostate? No, but it reverses our racial and cultural decline, shuts down the major feedback loops that are driving that decline, it would significantly whiten Dixie, and position us to pass further reforms as the international and cultural context changes in the decades ahead.

The first step is the hardest step to take. It has to be secession.

Our Strategy – Dealing With The Jews

Southerners admire the Israelis.

We ought to use that to our advantage: the Israelis have built a massive border fence and concentration camps for the deportation of illegal aliens from South Sudan and Eritrea. They call themselves a “Jewish state.” They have a great immigration policy which we should claim as the model of our own:


How would Southern secession intersect with the Jewish Question? How many Jews live in the South compared to the rest of the United States?

Source: Wikipedia

Alabama – 8,850
Arkansas – 1,725
Florida – 638,635
Georgia -127,670
Mississippi -1,575
Louisiana – 10,675
Kentucky – 11,300
North Carolina – 30,675
Tennessee – 19,600
Missouri – 59,175
Virginia – 97,290
West Virginia – 2,335
South Carolina – 12,545
Oklahoma – 4,700
Texas – 139,565

Total U.S. Jewish Population: 6,588,065
Total Southern U.S. Jewish Population: 1,164,315
Southern U.S. Jewish Population as Percent of Total U.S. Jewish Population: 17.7%

If the Republic of Dixie seceded from the United States, we would carry out less than 1/5th of the Jewish population in America, over half of which is concentrated in South Florida and the Washington Metro Area.

Of the Jewish members of the 112th Congress, 5 of 26 in the House are from the South (Cantor, Cohen, Yarmuth, Deutsch, and Wasserman-Schultz), and none of the 13 Jews in the U.S. Senate are from the South. Eric Cantor, the only Jewish Republican, is the only Jew in Dixie who represents a majority Southern White Christian district. There are no Jewish governors in the South.

Secession would eliminate the three Jews on the U.S. Supreme Court: Elena Kagan, a Jewess from New York City, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a Jewess from New York City, and Stephen Breyer, a Jew from San Francisco. It would also eliminate every single Jewish federal judge in Dixie.

As a practical matter, the Jews in NOVA who work for the federal government won’t be coming with us in the Republic of Dixie. The great bulk of the Jews in South Florida (where over half the Jewish population in Dixie lives) are snowbirds from states like New York and New Jersey who will simply die out over the next twenty to thirty years.

In the 2012 election, Barack Obama won 69% of the Jewish vote nationwide. In a 2010 Gallup poll of ideology by religion, 43% of the Jews described themselves as “liberal,” 35% as “moderate,” and 20% as “conservative.” A Pew poll recently found that 66% of Jews are “Democrat/Lean Democrat.”

How does this relate to our strategy of encouraging Southerners to revolt in defense of Christianity and their own conservative values? If that actually happened and the Southern states seceded from the Union, it means that Jews who are among the most liberal Democrats in America would among the unhappiest people in the Republic of Dixie, and huge numbers of them would self deport to the United States.

If the Southern states seceded from the Union, we would lose the capacity to fight foreign wars for Israel, which is a common criticism made by White Nationalists, and it is even more unlikely that we could sustain foreign aid to Israel in light of the high costs of the transition to independence.

The Jewish progressive social agenda would be totally and utterly defeated. Every Southern state would ban gay marriage and abortion. Christianity would aggressively move into the public schools and the public square. The site of the cross would have an effect that would look something like this:

Does this solve the Jewish Question? No, but secession alone will ameliorate the problem, break the Jewish stranglehold over Dixie, and put Southern White Christians in charge of their own fate. Without the interference of Washington, they will chart a radically different course, one which liberal Jews will find extremely inhospitable and probably so offensive that they will leave.

About Hunter Wallace 12367 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

50 Comments

  1. Demographically, the small population of Wyoming and Montana means that those states, even if 100% of the White population revolted, don’t have a chance to resist the federal government without the support of the South.

  2. “Then there is the matter of Dixie’s historical baggage. No matter how noble our desire to secede may actually be, BRA’s propaganda empire will make certain that all the rest of America (and the world) will see in any neo-Confederate movement is slavery, the Klan, and Bull Connor attacking Negro children with firehoses and dogs. ”
    – Robert Oculus

    I think Russian and Chinese observers should be invited to Dixie to ensure that our elections are free and fair and to see to it that the United States is as committed to the democratic process at home as it is abroad in places like Taiwan, Georgia, and Ukraine.

  3. It would be helpful to define the meaning of goals, objectives, strategies and tactics and their relationship with one another.

    After reading, at the head of the present post, that the upcoming installment of RFM will be about “goals, tactics, and strategy,” Mr. W., I was pleased to encounter, here, amid the comments, that simple statement from Mr. Giles. Yes, I do hope you attach clear meanings to those terms; I personally am never sure what they mean. In fact, I think it will be helpful to re-post the whole of what Mr. Giles said:

    It would be helpful to define the meaning of goals, objectives, strategies and tactics and their relationship with one another. They are not synonymous and there is a hierarchy amongst them.

    Has anyone here ever written a business plan?

  4. I think Russian and Chinese observers should be invited to Dixie to ensure that our elections are free and fair and to see to it that the United States is as committed to the democratic process at home as it is abroad in places like Taiwan, Georgia, and Ukraine.

    I agree.

    Have you ever heard of John Titor? He was a guy back in the early 200os who made quite a splash online with his barefaced claim of being a time traveler. Titor told a very interesting tale about the future. On his timeline (he was from 2036), the US was still recovering from a bloody civil war, a war fought for the very reasons we all want to secede. In his war, a number of states refused to cooperate with Washington’s increasing violations of freedom. In response to this, the federal entity locked down the major cities in the rebel states using military force and instituted a nationwide surveillance/police state, which led to a split in the military and the rise of volunteer militias. A lengthy civil war ensued, killing millions. As the war grew ever more bitter, the federal entity began to act erratically, at which point DC’s ability to control the nuclear arsenal could no longer be relied upon. At that point, Russia stepped in and nuked a number of US cities (all of them BRA-dominated). (Titor implied but never outright stated that there had been some collusion in this strike between the secessionists and the Russians.) This nuclear strike broke the back of the federal entity, enabling the secessionist states to make a final push and roll over the remaining federal forces. Afterward, at a constitutional convention, the federal entity was devolved into five regional governments, each independent of the others in internal policy while united with the others in matters of defense, etc. The capital of the new United States was established at Omaha, as Washington no longer existed.

    Was John Titor truly a time traveler? Or was he just a world-class bullshitter? No one knows. Some of his predictions did not come true (a fact which he “explained” as the result of his changing the timeline by coming back). On the other hand, he actually posted a detailed engineering drawing of his time machine, which, even if fake, makes for an impressive bit of quality bullshit. In any case, your idea about inviting the Russkies over brought John Titor’s tale to mind.

    Whether you believe Titor or not, his story of the final American civil war should be of interest to anyone allied with the ethnonationalist, White nationalist, or Southern cause.

  5. Sorry friends but callow libertarianism isn’t the solution for the Negro problem in a secession scenario. Think massive airlifts to Negro population centers coupled with Christian charities, UNICEF, Red Cross all in overdrive. The state budgets would look great but no chocolate exodus.

  6. Futura wrote, ‘If we say: “We’re seceding and everyone under our new national system within our borders will be absolutely and constitutionally and blindly equal before the law, regardless of race” and make that one of a number founding premises of OUR nation (except that we would MEAN it), we’ll do better than if we say: “We are seceding to form a WHITE STATE under the CONFEDERATE FLAG. We’ll handle our internal affairs just fine. Take a hike, Yankee. And come get all your niggers while you’re at it.”’

    You are erecting straw men to attack. I do not support the former and have not proposed the latter.

  7. Palmetto:

    Oh Jeezum Crow! I’m not attacking you! I’m saying that if racial politics are at the top of the list of grievances, it plays into the anti-Southern stereotypes that Yankee Unionists use to argue that our movement is the knee-jerk result of a black president.

  8. Futura,

    You don’t seem to appreciate one the main reasons secession is necessary. Equality doesn’t work as an organizing principle for society. What would be the point of seceding to immediately recreate a society organized on the same equality principles as the US just located in the South?

    There will have to population transfers, but that doesn’t mean violence. Economic incentives will work. People respond to incentives. If it comes to violence, it will be because the regime and its supporters persist in their determination to eradicate Southern and other Whites.

  9. BRA’s propaganda empire will make certain that all the rest of America (and the world) will see in any neo-Confederate movement is slavery, the Klan, and Bull Connor attacking Negro children with firehoses and dogs. ”
    – Robert Oculus

    Jewish propagandists will do this.

    Jewish. 

    As in Jews.

  10. HW says: “The race question with African-Americans and Hispanics can and should be subordinated to the priority of secession and securing our independence.”

    You’re putting the cart in front of the horse. The race question is: “Can secession happen without southern black, mexican, homegrown DWL, yankee carpetbagger, and pensioner support?” The answer is no.

    BRA has won the game and all it has to do is run out the clock. In Georgia, 58.8% of children under the age of one are minorities.

  11. Are we really wondering if some anonymous guy was actually a time traveler? Is that how insipid this has become?

    Tom is right – the demographics are fatal, BRA has already won, especially in the South. There is no worse place to be in the USA than the South, in this regard. Sorry, Hunter, you are engaging in pure fantasy when you need to be thinking clearly.

    The USA is doomed, over. By 2025, at latest, it will be hellish. I’m emigrating, as I recommend to all whites with the means to do so.

  12. The answer is absolutely.

    Democrats are shut out of every Southern state legislature except Kentucky and West Virginia. They control the governorship only in Arkansas, Kentucky, and West Virginia.

    As for coalitions of carpetbaggers and blacks and Hispanics, that was tried before when the South was much blacker than it is today, when 95% of blacks lived here with the Union Army present on the streets.

    There are physical monuments across the South that tell the story of how it ended. Palmetto Patriot has already wrote about the statue on the grounds of the South Carolina state capital.

  13. You’re wrong.

    Democrats have the Northeast locked up: the electoral college, House seats, Senate seats, state legislatures, etc. They have it locked up right now because 1/2 the “White people” who live there are effectively black.

    Their power in the South is actually at a historic ebb. In the last election, their power here declined every further in even Southern state but Missouri, Florida, and Texas.

  14. HW- “Democrats are shut out of every Southern state legislature except Kentucky and West Virginia. They control the governorship only in Arkansas, Kentucky, and West Virginia.”

    Secessionists are shut out of every legislature, Yankee or Southern.

  15. “As for coalitions of carpetbaggers and blacks and Hispanics, that was tried before when the South was much blacker than it is today, when 95% of blacks lived here with the Union Army present on the streets.”

    Like I said, you don’t need a majority, just a majority of the VOTE. How you get that is entirely up to how motivated you are.

  16. Lew et. al.

    I fully appreciate the racial and demographic reality and why it necessitates a secession and ethnostate. I will try to make one final statement on this thread as to what I am driving at. I will endeavour to be succinct. To wit:

    There are many reasons to secede, among them the ongoing and large-scale demographic gerrymandering of America. But we must be very careful–as Michael of Southern Nationalist Network conspicuously and smartly demonstrates in his “why” video–to make sure that the OTHER reasons are stated with equal force. Also, we must be careful that the questions of possible population displacement/change of employment status/political status of those in the South dependent on the existent Federal government and those Southrons who are anti-secession are given MEASURED answers and not flip, pat or “vengeful glint in the eye” solutions.

    Mr. Wallace is obviously an intellectual of high calibre…an effort must be made to ensure that the leadership of the now truly burgeoning secession movement looks as rational as possible and, if it must endure attacks, the attackers have to be the ones to look intolerant, not the secessionists. So far, so good. But as the movement grows, which it is and will, voices may grow strident and we don’t want to end up looking like the crazy, racist redneck assholes They want us to be.

  17. The US government will never permit the South to break off from the country and form a separate nation. Here’s why:

    1 – Doing so would be an admission of weakness, emboldening foreign powers, terrorists, and others to make ever-escalating demands against the US as well.

    2 – By doing so, the US government would be instantly creating a dangerous military threat fronting two thousand miles of its southern border. Who but a fool would do that?

    3 – Doing so would unleash a tsunami of negroes upon the American north. The result would be massive social upheaval, increased welfare costs, unemployment, crime, and violence. Who but a fool would permit that?

    4 – The US went to great trouble to bring down racist South Africa. Knowing that, why would they erect a de facto “South Africa” right in their own backyard?

    5 – Finally, North and South are too economically intertwined for US industry to ever sever the connection.

    Many on the forum respect Southerner David Duke. Ask him his opinion of Southern secession. If he says “sounds great”, ask him to head the effort. If he demurs, then you know he really thinks the idea is shi*t. If he says no, same conclusion came be drawn.

    In short, ask the experts. Short of agreeing to devote their lives entirely to this effort, then they’re basically telling us the idea stinks.

    I can smell the odor of rot even now…

  18. The doubters on this site need to understand how incompetent Uncle Sugar has become. If the federal government continues its downward spiral and there is no reason to think that it won’t, people are going to become desperate for some kind of competent organization to maintain their society. That is how succession can become viable.

  19. Re: “There is no political cure for a decompiled culture.” Please explain your use of the computing term “decompiled” in relation to “culture” here.

    The Jew Map (above) proves mostly that they do not choose to live in rural areas, especially not in POOR rural areas, such as OUR county where they appear at only Alabama density. Southeastern states and other states (such as North Dakota and Montana) that are less densely populated, and POORER states, tend to have less. But there are very high concentrations in all parts of Massachussetts, even the less densely populated western counties. What is it about Massachussetts?

    Greg Johnson wrote: “All such ‘implicitly’ white approaches are losers for whites.” Well, whether this will prove to be a winning or losing strategy, the pattern — of reliance on the “subliminal magic” of “implicit whiteness,” transition from “outlaw” conservatism to a more mainstream conservatism appealing to Tea Partiers and Republicans, replacement of pan-white racialism with a regional ethnoculturalism, polarization from non-“Southron” whites — is at least very consistent!

    As I sometimes do, I agree especially with Jack Ryan’s comment on this thread. He did not respond, surprisingly, to Hunter’s reference to Ron Paul in the first point. Ron Paul really has been making better, helpful statements now that campaigning days are over.

  20. Jack: ‘Are we really wondering if some anonymous guy was actually a time traveler? Is that how insipid this has become?

    Tom is right – the demographics are fatal, BRA has already won, especially in the South. There is no worse place to be in the USA than the South, in this regard. Sorry, Hunter, you are engaging in pure fantasy when you need to be thinking clearly.

    The USA is doomed, over. By 2025, at latest, it will be hellish. I’m emigrating, as I recommend to all whites with the means to do so.’

    lol… Have fun living abroad then. Been there and done that. Same problems there as we have here. And there you can’t do much about it as an immigrant. Also, your extreme pessimism and negative view of the South is disturbing. I have lived in the South my whole life (except for the 4 years I spent abroad) and I would not want to live anywhere else in the USA. I’ve been to other places and I didn’t care for them. They aren’t home. The people and culture are different. I like it here. It’s not at all dreadful. Yes, the local Yankee retirement colony is horrible (and it’s nearly all White, by the way) but outside of that things are much better. I also have much more hope for the future than you, apparently. On one point I do agree with you: the USA is doomed. I see that as a good thing since the USA has only ever been bad news for my people. I wish it had never been created. And I’m looking forward to being rid of it.

  21. Steve says:
    December 1, 2012 at 1:59 am
    The doubters on this site need to understand how incompetent Uncle Sugar has become. If the federal government continues its downward spiral and there is no reason to think that it won’t, people are going to become desperate for some kind of competent organization to maintain their society. That is how succession can become viable.

    Yep, blacks will suddenly start trusting white southerners to provide for them rather than their black mayors and city council members. They’ll be especially happy when you tell them you want to get rid of affirmative action, section 8, food stamps, and access to white schools.

  22. “Their power in the South is actually at a historic ebb. In the last election, their power here declined every further in even Southern state but Missouri, Florida, and Texas.”

    Possibly, or else they observed the last gasping rise of old and middle-aged conservatives to the surface before the final tidal wave of demography and the anti-Christian Hollywood culture of amorality practiced almost universally by their younger generations comes and drowns them.

  23. Futura,

    Even I said above to let them retain their voting rights and civil rights. It is a bitter pill to swallow, but one that I would happily swallow in exchange for independence, which gets us somewhere and removes 90% of the problem which is the Union.

    Let the Russians and Chinese supervise our elections – if we could get Uncle Sam off their back, they would jump at the chance.

    In a Southern Congress, we could easily dismantle the welfare state. That is the most effective and “humane” way (this matters a great deal to foreigners) to force them out and secure our majority anyway.

    The single most important objectives must be immigration reform and border security, getting rid of the federal courts, and shutting down the Great Society programs which taxes and redistributes our wealth to the exploding underclass.

  24. “I have lived in the South my whole life (except for the 4 years I spent abroad) and I would not want to live anywhere else in the USA. I’ve been to other places and I didn’t care for them. They aren’t home. The people and culture are different. I like it here. It’s not at all dreadful.”

    Palmetto Patriot is right. We belong to the home of our birth and upbringing, unless perhaps it is an urban area that has been completely overrun, destroyed and unrecognisable now. “Sense of place” sustains every true community, ethnoculture and nation, and is essential to true conservatism.

  25. tom says:

    “Yep, blacks will suddenly start trusting white southerners to provide for them rather than their black mayors and city council members. They’ll be especially happy when you tell them you want to get rid of affirmative action, section 8, food stamps, and access to white schools.”

    What are you talking about? In the not-too-distant future, Uncle Sugar is going to be too incompetent and too broke to be able to provide those things, regardless of what we want.

  26. “(W)e could easily dismantle the welfare state. That is the most effective and ‘humane’ way (this matters a great deal to foreigners) to force them out and secure our majority anyway.”

    Why then did OD come out for the Neocon candidate in the Republican primary instead of supporting a candidate who would have FAVOURED the full exercise of states’ rights including their right to nullify (and even secede) and to dismantle the welfare state in their territories?

  27. Steve says:
    December 1, 2012 at 3:42 am
    tom says:

    “Yep, blacks will suddenly start trusting white southerners to provide for them rather than their black mayors and city council members. They’ll be especially happy when you tell them you want to get rid of affirmative action, section 8, food stamps, and access to white schools.”

    What are you talking about? In the not-too-distant future, Uncle Sugar is going to be too incompetent and too broke to be able to provide those things, regardless of what we want.

    By the time the printing press runs dry, Amurrica will be a Brown country. White men will be blamed for the collapse and third world status will be complete. At that point, even Rubio will be too pro white for consideration.

  28. As commander-in-chief, wouldn’t he have been able to prevent or limit federal forces being used to prevent states from exercising their rights? Southern white voters, especially, seemed to want another Bush-type “moderate” for their President rather than a states’ rights constitutionalist.

  29. I keep seeing as the first step toward establishment of Republic of Dixie a civic organization with energetic chapters ,however small in every town.Call them “League of the South” or anything else but reshape their character from an assembly of geriatric sentimentalists into mostly youth organization of extreme patriotism.Loving the South is most natural and lasting dedication of the heart.It would soon replace TV,computer games and stupid sports. Promoting moral purity,honorable behavior,selflessness,dedication to everything minutely local and rural,thrift,self-reliance,Southern heroism and proud rejection of all that is false,filthy,un-Southern.Such movement would exist without permission,approval of blessings of ZOG or BRA and it would grow huge.People would feel suddenly besotted with pure joy of doing something right now for their country,well before the big, conclusive Secession.Let’s all emigrate to Dixie now!

  30. “Promoting moral purity, honorable behavior, selflessness, dedication to everything minutely local and rural, thrift, self-reliance…rejection of all that is false, filthy…”

    Sounds more like true Christian revival than a fad of localist do-gooderism. True revival WOULD “exist without permission ,approval or blessings of ZOG or BRA and it would grow huge” and “people would feel suddenly besotted with pure joy of doing something right again” and it “would soon replace TV, computer games and stupid sports” — and (as it is written, in the Scripture) “against such things there is no law.”

    This is that OTHER approach, which I alluded to (above) because I will not ride religious hobby horse here.

  31. Church of Botany suggested it should be “a civic organization” — therefore not another typically corrupted “church” organisation!

  32. “reshape their character from an assembly of geriatric sentimentalists into mostly youth organization”: But beware of youthful enthusiasm unguided and unrestrained by the wisdom of “geriatrics.”

  33. @Lew, December 1, 2012 at 12:19 am.

    Yes, Lew, I know, I know. Jews run Hollywood. The Jews run the media. It’s all those evil Jews. Jews Jews Jews Jews. Jews are to blame for everything. Jews are evil. Khazar, ZOG, Kevin MacDonald, VNN, 14 Words, “88”. Mister we could use a man like George Lincoln Rockwell again.

    Are you happy now?

    With respect: White people blaming the Jew for losing the country is like Negroes blaming Whitey because they can’t read or earn a living. Well, please pardon me, but I’m not the kind of person who does that sort of thing. Blaming “the other” has always been the mark of the loser. It’s easier to justify your failure that way. After all, once you push all the blame for your own failures onto someone else, you don’t have to take responsibility for them. “The Jews control the media” = “De white man controls all de jobs!”

    Well, count me out. I’m a winner, and when I lose I take responsibility for my loss.

    The Jews don’t control my destiny. They don’t control America*. They can’t even control Israel, or New York, or 770 Eastern Parkway, Crown Heights, Brooklyn, the Jewiest Place on Earth. Hell, they don’t even run L.A. any more, not really. The Chinks and the Arabs run showbiz, and the Armenians run everything else. Canter’s hasn’t been kosher in decades.

    But don’t let me interrupt your Jew thing. Want to hate Jews? Be my guest. Hate Negroes, Chinks, and Armenians, too, while you’re at it. Hate me, too. Blame everybody but your fellow White people for getting us in this mess. After all, you’re a member of a minority, now. “The Man be keepin’ us down” is the battle cry of the minority loser who can’t quite cut the mustard. A White man faces his own failure squarely and deals with it.

    So you’ll forgive me if I don’t join in your chorus of the Horst-Wessel-Lied. The Jews didn’t ruin America. We Whites did it to ourselves. The Jews aren’t keeping us down. Nobody’s keeping us down but us.

    *The Freemasons do that.

    PS to HW – I apologize for the harsh tone. If this post doesn’t make it past moderation, I understand.

  34. Hold on there Oculus. You could have smooth running nation without Jews. We saw it in England post Edward I expulsion til Cromwell. We can do without them. They otoh can’t go long without us. The black is a natural slave. The Jew is a natural middleman.
    We have plenty of middlemen in our own ethne and don’t need a highly nepotistic ethnoreligious tribe performing that middleman role. They are surplus to requirement.

  35. Armed revolution is impossible.

    I love how people throw this out as though it’s the most obvious thing in the world. There are more privately-owned firearms in this country than anywhere in the world, and the super-army you think will easily crush any resistance has failed its counterinsurgency mission in Iraq and Afghanistan. Yet they’ll easily crush rebels who will be an order of magnitude more numerous, better armed, better trained, and inhabiting a far lager landmass than the Taliban?

    Statements like this are almost always made in bad faith by people who simply don’t like the idea. Not only are you not a student of history, but you’re not the least bit interested in the subject. Hence, it’s tossed aside in a single sentence.

    I think you’ll be very surprised just how violent things are going to get in this country. I think it’s going to happen regardless of anyone’s plans. And remember Beat Whitey Night, Knoxville, Wichita, and Katrina. The violence will not be initiated by whites. It never is.

  36. Armed revolution is impossible.

    I love how people throw this out as though it’s the most obvious thing in the world. There are more privately-owned firearms in this country than anywhere in the world, and the super-army you think will easily crush any resistance has failed its counterinsurgency mission in Iraq and Afghanistan. Yet they’ll easily crush rebels who will be an order of magnitude more numerous, better armed, better trained, and inhabiting a far lager landmass than the Taliban?

    Statements like this are almost always made in bad faith by people who simply don’t like the idea. Not only are you not a student of history, but you’re not the least bit interested in the subject. Hence, it’s tossed aside in a single sentence.

    I think you’ll be very surprised just how violent things are going to get in this country. I think it’s going to happen regardless of anyone’s plans. And remember Beat Whitey Night, Knoxville, Wichita, and Katrina. The violence will not be initiated by whites. It never is.

    The NDAA and patriot act were tailor-made for precisely such a situation.

  37. Let me first say that upon first reading this, I wanted to believe, really I did.

    However.

    Secession can only happen in 2 ways.
    1. The Federal Government goes Kaput allowing states to scramble for themselves and make regional associations (possible but when?)
    2. Violent overthrow
    (voting will not happen, the antis, welfare whites, old people, women, blacks, mexicans, yee haw americans will not vote for it)

    Now even if it did somehow happen peaceably, any new nation in the south that is not an etho-state will end in a Boer style genocide. Whites are outnumbered and will be outvoted out bred and eventually the same problems we face now will continue.

    The only way to save our race from eventual destruction is we must have an white ethno state. Our people are too kind, gentle and always wanting to help that if we are not an ethno state we will bring on our own destruction.

    This means that we must do one of the following.
    1. Ethnically cleanse areas where we are outnumbered and face expelling 10s of millions
    2. Ethnically cleanse areas that are sparingly occupied by minorities.

    Option 1 would mean war similar to the 30 years war. Option 2 on the other hand could be done depending on the area possibly without much violence at all.

    As a Texan I am sad to say that however far fetched the HAC plan may be, its the only realistic plan to save our race in the United States. It is too late for Dixie, it was a fight that needed to happen in the 1950s. Today the south is too far gone demographically. Our best hope is to take an area that is 90%+ white. We were a 90% white country until 1965 we could be one again and protect our race if its an ethno state.

    As one mentioned before, a fight for Dixie will probably break up the US which would allow the majority white areas outside of Dixie to secure their own homelands. However at best Dixie will be mired in war for generations. I dont want to leave Texas, but this state is gone.

Comments are closed.