New York Times: America Is Not Ready For The End of Roe v. Wade

Bring it on.

New York Times:

“Imagine that every state were free to choose whether to allow Black people and white people to marry. Some states would permit such marriages; others probably wouldn’t. The laws would be a mishmash, and interracial couples would suffer, legally consigned to second-class status depending on where they lived.

It seems an unthinkable scenario in 2022. That’s because in 1967 the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that barring interracial marriage, as 16 states still did, violates the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection. “Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual, and cannot be infringed by the state,” the court stated in Loving v. Virginia.

More than half a century on, Loving is considered one of the court’s great rulings, and yet it was not universally admired at the time. Southern states complied only grudgingly; Alabama didn’t repeal its miscegenation law until 2000. That’s the point of having a federal Constitution that is supreme; the guarantees and rights in that document apply to all Americans equally, wherever they live. The court system — and the Supreme Court in particular — exists to protect those rights when state and local authorities refuse to.

Many who oppose Roe v. Wade today, and even some who support it, argue that the 1973 ruling short-circuited a running debate over abortion, a debate that should have been allowed to play out in the states, many of which had long banned abortion. This is one of the main justifications in the leaked draft opinion in which a majority of Supreme Court justices appear ready to overturn Roe and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the 1992 decision that preserved Roe’s central holding with certain restrictions.

The problem with this reasoning is that, as in Loving, leaving the matter to individual states and the political process means that millions of Americans will be denied their fundamental rights — in this case, the right of women to decide what happens inside their own bodies. …”


  1. Without abortion, women still have the right to decide what happens to their bodies. They decide to become pregnant or not, then they live with the consequences of that decision (carrying the baby).

  2. The way the left whinge on about this, they act as if the Supreme Court required all states to criminalize abortion. That wouldnt be the role of judges either. Lawyers are good at one thing: law. When it comes to parsing the difficult moral and policy questions of abortion, a greater cross section of society gets to participate in the debate in the state legislature, where not every representative is a professional lawyer. Nor should they be. Isnt a greater cross section of people what the left wants making decisions in an “our democracy?”

  3. “Imagine that every state were free to choose whether to allow Black people and white people to marry. Some states would permit such marriages; others probably wouldn’t. The laws would be a mishmash, and interracial couples would suffer, legally consigned to second-class status depending on where they lived.”

  4. “Imagine that every state were free to choose whether to allow Black people and white people to marry. Some states would permit such marriages; others probably wouldn’t. The laws would be a mishmash, and interracial couples would suffer, legally consigned to second-class status depending on where they lived.”

    This is bullshit and they know it.

    I don’t think there is one state that would make laws banning interracial marriage. Not one.

    These kinds of hysterics are designed to radicalize dumb people.
    I’m not saying that there aren’t circumstances that could eventually occur that could lead us there, but under current social arrangements, there’s no way that anyone would have the courage to do thus.

    • Notice how the assholes at the Times capitalize Black but not white. Did you notice?

      • That’s because there’s no such thing as the white race but the White race has to go. Everywhere “race mixing” is promoted one of the races is always White.

    • 99% of blacks don’t live in what would be the rump state of the US and after the split would not be allowed entry so little need for miscegenation laws. Most of the rest will not survive without food assistance anyway.

    • I also agree.

      Extreme cases of things like rape and incest are rare. These cases are not worth dwelling on. The problem is total deregulation of sexuality because self-expression is overvalued at the expense of society. Abortion for lifestyle reasons is the issue.

      • If rape leads to an abortion, then the rapist should be also charged with murder
        Problem solved

      • The rape and incest arguments have always been straw men. The number of pregnancies resulting form rape and incest are extremely small, and forcing a woman to bear a rapist’s offspring is immoral in its own way. Only the most stringent pro-lifers advocated outlawing abortion in such cases – usually on the basis of their own slippery slope arguments.

  5. “In short, constitutional rights are meaningless unless they apply across the entire country. That is why the Supreme Court decided Loving v. Virginia and Roe v. Wade as it did. These rights are inherent in the Constitution, even if they are not explicit in it.”

    The Founders in no way intended for abortion & miscegenation to be protected by the constitution. They were not idolaters of anything-goes hyper-individualism, no matter the consequences for society as a whole. The “penumbras & emanations” are pure jewshit.

    The jYT and all the other (((Cultural Marxist))) scum are shrieking over this because they actually loathe & fear the “Our Democracy” they’re always posing as the staunch defenders of. The idea of federalism – of the “Flyova white trash” belng allowed to decide any issues that really matter – is anathema to them because they know that in many instances they will reject the left-modernism that’s been rammed down their throats from jew Yawk, Washington & Hymiewitz for decade after decade.

  6. The Enemy doesnt give a care about abortion, any thinking person realizes that abortion will be unfettered now, unlike Roe.

    What they care about is legislating from the bench taking a backseat to democracy.

    Despite their nonstop use of the term, The Enemy hates democracy with the same searing inferno of hatred that they hate the people.

  7. Is America ready for polygenic testing, scoring, and selection of human embryos?

    IVF involves hormonally stimulating a woman to produce ova, which are then harvested, fertilized in vitro, and implanted; the other unused embryos are usually frozen — if an implanted embryo fails to produce a viable pregnancy, one of the frozen embryos can be implanted — any unused embryos are eventually destroyed — this is already happening, i.e. large numbers of human embryos are created and destroyed.

    But now rapidly advancing screening technology allow embryos to be analyzed genetically, and selected for specific traits (‘complex trait prediction’, ‘designer babies’): prevention of inherited disease, behavioral characteristics, intelligence, etc.

    Steve Hsu is involved in this polygenic analysis and covers it extensively on his blog Information Processing.

    With a growing number of couples having trouble conceiving naturally, as well as the desire of homosexual couples to have children, polygenic prediction and selection is set to increase dramatically, which will also dramatically increase the number of human embryos being destroyed.

    When I challenge Hsu about the moral aspects of this (link), he is largely dismissive — but society will soon be forced to confront this question.

  8. Feeling a little less confident about the midtetms?……Meanwhile, over on Anglin’s board his Cabal of Catholic homosexuals are only just now realizing problems with J.D. Vance. Such as, he is married to a street shitter Hindu lawyer, who actually serms to be his controller……And the Yale thing. But these dimwits cannot add 1+1. Add in his working for the homosexual deep stater Thiel, and you have 1+1+1. But Anglin’s dipsticks cannot do basic addition any more than they can understand virology.

    Vance was recruited while at the University of the CIA, Yale. He is CIA, and that is all he has ever been.

    • I’m aware of all that.

      I went ahead and endorsed Vance and Brooks though because I have an even dimmer view of the Republican Senate and people like Lindsey Graham.

  9. The New York Times/Jew York Times just changed the national script – or so they think:

    No one is allowed to “notice” the collapsing stock market, mass inflation, border anarchy and exploding Black crime or Will Smith Hollywood celebrities doing and saying stupid things.

    No the topic of the day is (drum roll)


    And so the anti White, jews media will run endless video footage of robbed KKK Klansmen burning crosses, starving Jews in NAZI concentration camps, Southern policemen sicking dogs and fire hoses on sainted Black Civil Rights protesters.

    And we’ll get lots of well paid fake Conservatives from Jonah Goldberg’s (Inter) National Review, George WiLL, Mitt Romney, Lisping Lindsey Graham, Jeff Flake, George W Bush, Karl Rove, Everybody at Fox except Tucker Carlson to take a strong stand against

    “HATE, Religious Bigotry” “Hate isn’t a true Conservative cause, we’re a nation of immigrants, we’ll fight and defeat these bigots like we defeated the NAZIS and SADDAM HUSSEIN”.

    And yeah, the media will turn the TV and microphones on real life, stupid, dumb ass Bible thumpers who want to force “CREATIONISM” and Protestant Christian prayers in public schools, overturn the 1960s and turn back the clock and oppose science and progress.

    Who would be against “Progress”? Just backward, ignorant people.

    So that’s the new NY Times, Jews media script.

    Do people here want to live our lives reading from a bad anti White Jew media script.

    I don’t.

    I prefer to play, compete to win isn’t winning better than always losing?

    Oh, I know the never say die Libertarian Constitutionalists just love LOVE to lose ALWAYS lose – don’t want to compromise with “THE SYSTEM”.

    It’s something out of a (race doesn’t exist) Ayn Rand Rosenbuam novel. Ayn Rand tried to write scripts for Jew Hollywood but the powers that be thought her characters weren’t believable and her novels were to long and preachy.

    This November should be the greatest landslide Congressional victory for racially conscious White and White allied populists – running and winning on “It’s the ECONOMY STUPID”, “It’s INFLATION STUPID”, “IT’S BORDER ANARCHY STUPID”, “It’s Violent (Black) Crime stupid.

    But the stupid party, our dumb goyim folks might very well decide to make Abortion and anti Catholic church denomination weird obsessions the #1 issue – force women in to back alley abortions, try to make the United States a 10th century Protestant Christian theology.

    We haven’t seen or heard the Ron and Rand Paul Libertarian Cult say or do something really stupid like vow to end all Social Security payments, end the minimum wage and let American woke corporations hire and fire everyone they want, replace our White American workers with sub minimum wage happy Indian H1B slaves, let old Cliven Bundy and his Cowboy sons bring in millions of more Mestizo ranch hands who supposedly have better work ethnic than native White Americans – owe these fat Western Cowboys also want to slaughter all the beautiful wolves and end all environmental laws.

    Hey as John Cougar Melenkamp once sang:

    “Ain’t that America – little pink houses for you and me”.

  10. “America Is Not Ready For The End of Roe v. Wade.”

    Correction: Yankeedom and their Pac-Rim allies are not Ready For The End of Roe v. Wade. “America,” meaning the South and the Interior West, are past ready.

    None of this is really about abortion. It’s about a return to federalism, which means that the SJW’s north of the Ohio River/Mason-Dixon Line, and in Mexifornia, won’t be imposing their will on Dixie and cattlemen in Wyoming anymore.
    They know danged good and well that none of their nonsense is threatened in their own states. What’s threatened is their presumed right to tell their subordinate subjects, in the colonial territories outside of the United States of New England, what to do. They’re not satisfied with just their states being “blue.” This is why they’ve always opposed federalism and the Constitution. It’s hard, if not impossible, to impose your will, across the board, on a federality. Which is exactly what the founding fathers knew and intended.

    As an aside; On maps of the War for Southern Independence, The “Union” forces are depicted in blue, and Southern forces in red. The blue state/red state dichotomy is just the same old Yankees vs America spat, that didn’t start in 1861, or end in 1865.

    End Reconstruction. End the War. Return to Jeffersonian America.

    • Do you consider South Florida to be part of Dixie? It seems most of the people there are either from the upper Midwest, the Northeast or the Caribbean.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. A Baptist America Is Inevitable – Occidental Dissent

Comments are closed.