Tucker Carlson Slams Donald Trump

April 6, 2026 Hunter Wallace 2026 Midterms, Conservatism, donald trump, MAGA, MIGA, Politics, Populists 34

Tucker has crossed the Rubicon.

The worst case scenario is unfolding. Israel is hitting Iranian energy infrastructure. Iran is retaliating by blowing up the energy infrastructure of Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states.

34 Comments

  2. Oh so the Persians WANT us to keep bombing them, their children, neighbors, hospitals, etc.?? Well shit Donald, why didn’t you just say so in the first place??
    Ok goyim, nothing to see here. Just move along now.

    Reply

  5. >>>> Iran is retaliating by blowing up the energy infrastructure of Saudi Arabia

    If they disable the Petroline, oil will really spike.

    Reply

  6. What is amazing me, is the precision of the Iranian missiles. They are just unreal. Hitting the AWACS mid plane, right in the radome.

    Reply

    • I particularly liked how the Iranians MIRVed their convention warheads on their ballistic missles to overwhelm the iron dome. The mossad was so busy trying to weasel their way into Iran’s nuclear program they missed that.

      Reply

  7. Put him in the Palantir gulag for doubting the pee wee brained Cheeto messiah.
    Breaking-Paula White is speaking jive.

    Reply

  8. Can you love a gun even if it has no history? If it isn’t
    a cheap, mass-produced plastic model, but rather hand-
    crafted from high-quality materials—as is the case with
    Krieghoff’s sporting and hunting rifles—then absolutely.
    Production process, enable available English subtitles.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=le_4_O5K4dY

    Two British fans visit the manufacturing facility in Ulm (first three videos).
    https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaCk7LkHdXm1xW-jBjpU7Esv3eA-HBUJB

    The US branch of the firm.
    https://www.krieghoff.com/

    Reply

  9. i dont care what happens to that orange crypto-J.

    impeach the hell out of him. remove him for medical reasons. i dont care.

    Reply

    • If the dems can take control of the house and senate in November then in January you know the first order of business will be to impeach trump and once he’s gone to impeach vance. It’s been a lot of years but if I remember my high school civics class the next in line to take the office of president is the speaker of the house. LOL president hakeem jefferies. You can’t make it up.

      Reply

  11. Press TV Exclusive: US suffered major strategic defeat in failed Isfahan operation

    Exactly !

    This is what Larry Johnson was speculating.
    The ‘pilot rescue ‘ was really a failed raid on Iran’s nuclear facility at Isfahan.

    This also reveals the reason Trump has been so enraged, his kosher plan has failed

    (Additionally, explains why I couldn’t get access to PRESSTV.IR… They didn’t want the lie exposed.)

    Reply

  13. “The foolish leaders of America, who have poured all their interests at the feet of the Zionists,”

    Presstv makes a clear observation on our situation .

    Reply

  14. https://deadline.com/2026/04/dune-part-three-imax-70mm-1236782986/

    “On his father’s side, Herbert’s origins can be traced back to Germany, where his paternal grandfather, Karl Herbert, was born. Karl Herbert’s ancestors were rural farmers, and he immigrated to the United States in the late 19th century to seek a better life.”

    https://www.naijanews.com/buzz/people/career-biography-and-origin-of-the-personality-frank-herbert/

    Is the science fiction novel “Dune” popular culture, or highbrow literature? I myself would have a hard time classifying it as one or the other. I must admit, however, that I have never read the book, nor have I ever watched the films in their entirety.

    One thing is certain: it is not a work of explosive social criticism, nor is it a milestone of world literature that brought the entire structure crashing down, like Marx’s “Capital” or Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” (as, so to speak, its antithesis).

    If I were lying on the beach on vacation and the book happened to be nearby, I might take a look inside. If I were lying on the beach on vacation and the book happened to be nearby, I might take a look at it. However, it won’t be a leather-bound edition with embossed gold trim for decoration.

    The question arises as to whether it makes sense—or is even possible—to elevate this type of reading to such a high-end format. This likely appeals only to die-hard fans who are willing to pay both materials and time.

    For the astonishingly talented (though not entirely flawless) self-taught bookbinder (a trade that has all but died out), the 1.5 million views on his playlist likely made it worthwhile even without any sales.

    https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7JQte6_XNbjMBdByGq0vlw2QFmj7SXf2

    One thing is certain: a novel that Shoah-trickster and Hollywood billionaire Spielberg admires is definitely a reason not to read it…

    https://ew.com/steven-spielberg-and-kylie-jenner-both-dune-fans-11944011

    Reply

    • Perhaps it was a bit unfair of me to dismiss Frank Herbert’s literary achievement as a cheap paperback. After all, I’m not averse to the science fiction genre myself, and secondly, the idea of a desert planet with giant worms is certainly a brilliant setting that sticks in the memory and conjures up images in the mind—in other words, it sparks the imagination. So I’ve decided to watch the movie (but not the remakes) again.

      https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dune
      https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/D%C3%BCne

      AI says instead:

      “Dune is most likely a Germanic word, not a Latin one. The English word entered through French, and French in turn borrowed it from Dutch or another West Germanic source. So the path is roughly: Germanic base word ? Dutch/French transmission ? English.

      What makes the Latin idea less convincing is that the common dictionary explanations do not treat Latin as the main source. There are occasional comparisons with Latin forms in place names, but those are usually presented as speculative rather than decisive. The stronger line of descent is through the Germanic languages, where the word seems to have meant something like ‘hill’ or ‘sand hill.’

      So the safest conclusion is: the word is probably Germanic in origin, with an uncertain ultimate root, and not really Latin.”

      My next question: “Where are the largest dunes in the German-speaking world, including former German South West Africa/Namibia and East Prussia/Pomerania?”

      AI:
      “The largest dunes in the German-speaking or historically German-influenced area are mainly found in three places: Namibia’s Namib Desert, the Curonian Spit in former East Prussia, and the Pomeranian Baltic coast in present-day Poland/Germany-adjacent areas. In the Namib, the dunes around Sossusvlei are among the highest on Earth; the region was once part of German South West Africa. In former East Prussia, the Great Dune on the Curonian Spit is the classic major dune landscape, and in Pomerania the migrating dunes in the Slovincian National Park are especially famous, including the Lontzke Dune at more than 40 meters high.

      In today’s Germany
      For present-day Germany, the best-known and largest dune areas are on Amrum, Sylt, the East Frisian Islands, and several inland dune fields in northern Germany and along the Upper Rhine. The dunes on Amrum are among the most extensive dune landscapes in Germany, and the largest active migrating dune in Germany is said to be near Fuchsberg by Gommern, though it has already shrunk considerably. In Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, the dune near Klein Schmölen is sometimes described as the largest inland dune in Europe, reaching up to 40 meters in height.

      By region
      – Namibia / former German South West Africa: the largest dunes overall, especially in the Sossusvlei area of the Namib.
      – Former East Prussia: the Great Dune on the Curonian Spit is the classic major dune site.
      – Pomerania: the migrating dunes in Slovincian National Park, some over 40 meters high.
      – Present-day Germany: major dune landscapes on Amrum, Sylt, the East Frisian Islands, and several inland dune areas.

      Overall view
      If you mean the largest dunes in the entire historically German-influenced sphere, Namibia clearly comes first, because it has some of the highest dunes in the world. If you mean only the former German Baltic regions or present-day German-speaking areas, then the Curonian Spit and the S?owi?ski dunes are the key places.”

      Reply

      • The illustrator of the first sandworm, which was also adapted by Lynch for his film, was a man named John Schoenherr. We learn about him: “He was raised in a German-speaking household in a multilingual community.” Here, his son—also named John—talks about his father’s life.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iun519en3VQ
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Schoenherr

        In Lynch’s film, “Duke Leto Atreides” is played by Jürgen Prochnow, who apparently isn’t above repeatedly playing the dumb and/or evil Nazi, as he did even in his latest role in “The Last Rifleman” from 2023.

        Prochnow also has a supporting role in the rather idiotically appearing 2006 film “Beerfest,” which I’m currently watching. Just watching it makes people like me, who rarely drink beer (except cold ones on the beach in the summer), feel downright sick. This Bavarian bad habit (the British and Irish aren’t any better) is repulsive to me.

        https://ok.ru/video/2214312544849

        Incidentally, the director is a brown-skinned “American” named “Jay Chandrasekhar,” which suggests that his ancestors come from a country where the inhabitants are drowning in garbage and defecating on the streets.

        “Steve Finklestein, a Jewish scientist, may not be much of a drinker, but he has a theoretical knowledge of beer. At first, Finklestein shows little interest, but when he learns that the opponents they are to face are ‘tall, blond, German Herrenmenschs,’ he is convinced.”

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beerfest

        “A short sequence was removed from the German version. In the final scene, when the Americans face off against the Germans once again, the Jewish character Finklestein is mocked by the German Otto, who says he looks like he has pubic hair on his head. Otto then throws Finklestein’s kippah to the ground. In a fit of rage, Finklestein’s pupils turn into a yellow Star of David.”

        Reply

      • PS “Beerfest”: Mr. Schniedelwichsen (Herr Peckerjerking) a rather unimaginative “name”. But what does a discerning audience expect from this kind of shallow foolishness?

        Reply

  15. The Saudi Arabia strike appears to be a fake from what I’ve seen, likely footage from another strike from last year re-billed for the current conflict.

    That said, Trump actually looks like he’s ready to do some real damage tonight. This doesn’t feel like his previous TACO moments.

    Reply

  16. Mr. Floyd was destined for greater things, including a career as a social reformer, as he was deeply committed to fostering a more prosperous coexistence and livelihood for humanity. Exile to the moon would have been deeply unsatisfying, not only for us in terms of cost, but also for him, because up there there are not even members of his own ilk on whom he could have conducted his social studies. https://i.ibb.co/hFRZYCQS/Floyd-In-Space.jpg

    Reply

  17. If all of this somehow leads to the US abandoning or being forced out of the Middle East, then at least something positive can be hashed out of this mess.

    Reply

    • Fox News ‘firing’ him was/is just part of the show. It gave Carlson the appearance of being an “outsider” to the masses.

      Reply

  20. Recently, an American made a remark about our “elites” that I had to remember right away: “as dumb as a used condom.” It sounds even better than “as dumb as a bag of screws.” It’s not about humor, but about awareness. We mustn’t stop at this obviously playful superficiality; we must ask further:

    Is a used condom really dumb, and does it deserve to serve as a comparison for such people? Let’s not forget that it was the Jew Julius Fromm who invented the rubber condom; he had something very cunning in mind with it, without perhaps even realizing it: the prevention of our reproduction.

    German thoroughness means getting to the bottom of things, asking the right questions, and drawing the most logical conclusions. It means not settling for the obvious and the superficial. It means persistently probing and digging until no questions remain unanswered. The basics of this way of thinking are the so-called W-questions https://archive.is/jbGTd.

    Other considerations include questions as: To which question does situation xyz represent the answer? Or: What question was asked to produce the outcome situation xyz? To do this, one must view the world phenomenologically, as an expression of ontological entities, which are symbolized, manifested, and embodied in what appears to be “reality.”

    Reply

  21. I’m not a particularly religious man, I definitely subscribe to human beings having a “creator” of some kind. Of the three major semitic religions, Christianity actually makes sense…mostly (it definitely has it’s kooks unfortunately), whereas the other two are so bizarre and incomprehensible, the authors were probably insane or purposely malicious. That said, Christianity is steeped in weakness, especially currently. Christianity and shitlam are mortal enemies, full stop. History shows Christians should not break bread or sympathize with muslims imo. Anywho, I like Tucker (his former show was the only time I have ever watched fox news) but to me, he’s sliding into Christian kookery and getting a load of bullshit from the mullahmullahdingdongs he’s talking to. Him being angry over Trump dropping an F-bomb on Easter was so cringe to me, he reminded of the satanic panic Christian’s going nut’s over the game Mortal Kombat when I was kid. Who cares. Tucker’s critics are correct in that Tucker is like a “rightwing” version of a wokescold, demanding ideological purity. Tucker’s a great scold to, when it’s focused on the right things.

    Reply

  22. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_sexes_(game_theory)

    Not battle, but flame;
    not bargain, but name.
    Not therapy’s talk,
    but the lightning’s walk.

    The sexes are not made to cope
    by trimming all their edge with hope.
    They are not foes in some dull fight,
    but difference turned to living light.

    A man is not a woman’s clone,
    a woman not a man grown stone.
    They meet where opposite powers blend,
    and make a beginning, not an end.

    But modern souls, all talk and scheme,
    turn fire into an edited dream.
    They explain desire until it dies,
    then ask why nothing in them flies.

    For love is not a managed deal,
    not something that must first be “real.”
    It is the shock, the pull, the blaze,
    the ancient force that strips the haze.

    So drop the phrase “the battle of the sexes.”
    It flatters fools and feeds their reflexes.
    Not war — but force. Not war — but art.
    The old electric split of heart.

    What lives does not need to be translated.
    What burns is not improved, but fated.
    And what the timid call “understanding”
    is often only life disbanding.

    Reply

    • “Quantum of No?Response”

      He sat at his desk, precise and neat,
      A monument of calm and seat.
      Into his doorway, softly crept
      A whisper, “Peek?a?boo!”—then, lept.

      He flinched not; his pen still rolled,
      While Minnie slippers, pink and bold,
      Announced a presence—warm, bare?skinned,
      Who posed as if audition?pinned.

      She twirled, “Guess what I came to seek?”
      He sighed, “A PhD in Greek?”
      She pouted, straddling office space,
      He met her eyes—but not her face.

      Her breath was champagne, breaking law,
      Her tactics worthy of applause—
      Except his pulse, unmoved, at ease,
      Performed strict academic freeze.

      “Nothing?” she gasped. “Not even twitch?”
      He said, “Perhaps you flipped the switch.”
      She fumed, “I BESIT you, hear?”
      He smiled, “Then sit—just park it here.”

      Minutes passed; her pride wore thin.
      His patience thickened, zen within.
      Then—bored—she grabbed his open text,
      And read: “Quantum fields”… perplexed.

      He looked, at last—his gaze alive:
      “Now THAT’S how particles survive.”
      Her cheeks went red; she lost her claim—
      The body’s war had blown its flame.

      He sipped his tea, composed, complete.
      She murmured, “You’re annoyingly neat.”
      Outside, spring hummed its neutral song—
      Desire misfired. Thought turned on.

      Reply

      • She spreads her labia: “Look at it closely,
        breathe in its scent: moist salmon folds,
        garnished with curly angel hair – rosy
        innocence! You like that, don’t you?
        You can’t turn down this offer!

        […]

        You’re resisting? Without me, you’re just
        a remote-controlled set of underpants!
        The other men—the real, strong ones—
        will all have me, and you’ll have to watch
        helplessly because you’ve lost me!”

        Reply

      • The so-called battle of the sexes has always interested me. Why is it enough for women to have a vulva to control men? The final line of Goethe’s Faust reads: “And eternally the feminine draws us on high.” This can only have something to do with the urge to procreate in a general sense, because otherwise we would all be sperm donors.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_feminine

        Why do even billionaires let women fleece them, take them for a ride, and double-cross them, and hand over millions of their fortune as “compensation” for this? Why do men cling to this social construct—which is clearly identifiable as manipulation—in a monogamous (and thus disadvantageous to them) society?

        Reply

      • “I am part of that force which would the evil ever do, and ever does the good.”
        (Goethe’s Faust)

        In my view, men bear the primary blame for the evil in the world: they are incapable of recognizing the fundamental dual nature of women. For evil all too often disguises itself here as angel-like beauty. The more charming the exterior, the more depraved and treacherous the soul. And what here presents itself as in need of protection is, in truth, an invitation to ruin. The woman, on the other hand, is aware of this power, yet fails to recognize the wickedness within it. She is blind to her own abysmal nature. The conflict begins with the original sin.

        Reply

Leave a Reply to Mr Booey Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*