About Hunter Wallace 12448 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

20 Comments

  1. The Stable Genius’s support is collapsing now? Wait until he calls for conscription. The choice is ultimately ground war and conscription, use nuclear weapons against Iran or call off the war for Our Greatest Ally’s benefit, which neither he nor his successors can do. The Stable Genius has his orange nuts in a vise. $10/Gallon gasoline and $15/Gallon No. 2 diesel won’t help much either.

    The Ghost of Epstein is haunting this war which the Lügenpresse, as is its duty, does its best to ignore. All of the loathsome scumbags in Congress and the Lügenpresse condemning the Stable Genius for this war now are liars. If the Stable Genius had not started this Iran War the same ones condemning him now for starting the Iran war would be condemning him for not starting the Iran War. Our Greatest Ally must be served lest the Ghost of Epstein appear and reveal all of his secrets; the underlying threat/reason the flow of weapons, money and fuel continues unimpeded to Our Greatest Ally no matter what the loathsome scumbags (like Pocahontas) say.

    Reply

  2. Historic! Winningest winnarz evarz.
    Duh, winning.
    A solid gold turd is Moshe Trumpstein. (MIGA)

    Reply

  5. When Trump said, ‘i love Israel, absolutely love’, we all knew we had problems to come.

    Reply

  6. Living in a feminized age affects everything that concerns us. Among other things—and above all—it affects our visual and auditory habits. Femininity means depression, withdrawal, caution, gloom, the moon instead of the sun, shadow instead of light, receiving instead of giving.

    Interestingly, I realize today that almost all the songs I’ve ever written—and I composed them with great attention to detail—were written in major keys. Unconsciously, I gave space to optimism (meaning expansion) rather than pessimism (meaning surrender).

    If you listen to soundtracks from RediceTV, White Rabbit Radio, Night Nation Radio (and all those out there), you’ll notice that these people aren’t in the least bit aware of these connections. With digital technology, they’re creating acoustic valleys of despair that are a plague.

    These persons are “negatively charged” at the molecular level. Here I have composed a simple melody for you. As you can hear, the melody carries itself without needing accompaniment. Major stands for sharp, minor for soft. But I maintain that minor is the devil in disguise; it invites us to suffer. Resist it!

    https://onlinesequencer.net/5393219

    Reply

  7. In minor keys, scales are compressed. “Melodies” flow downhill. As a primary key, it should be avoided at all costs; at most, it can be used occasionally as a counterpoint. You won’t find children’s songs or marching songs in minor keys.

    Apply the male/female (yin/yang) principle to language. What could that mean? It means, of course, directness for masculinity, indirectness for femininity. The man is will (motivation), the woman is need (ultimately, lack).

    The man wants to act, the woman to please. The man exists as a provider; the woman is enough of herself. A man is a doer; otherwise, a failure. At least in the eyes of women, who have been “directing” him for quite some time.

    In reality, however, he behaves in a feminine manner; he has traded self-control for external control. When a woman “grants” him encouragement, he feels validated; he is a grown-up playmate, a remote-controlled pair of underwear.

    How differently are will and need expressed? To put it another way: Do we now express our will as need, if so, why? What “presses” us together like the minor key? Why don’t we expand and take the space that is rightfully ours?

    Reply

  8. The question of what is “compressing”—and, in all seriousness, causing so many incredibly absent-minded and inattentive persons to prefer self-pitying tones in the minor key—should not be too difficult to answer upon closer examination. It is, of course, the devastating drive toward egalitarianism.

    Which is the very opposite of our most fundamental aspirations and our natural constitution, both in mind and body. Take the workplace, for example: there, women have taken our space and are competing with us for it. If they are too strong, we are too weak. No excuse in the world can sugarcoat this.

    https://i.ibb.co/2Yk1QhwT/compression.jpg

    Reply

  9. This morning, for example, I woke up with this melody in my head (I often wake up with melodies in my head whose origin is completely unknown to me). You can hear the difference right away, because it’s in a sad minor key. That’s why, although I wrote it down in sheet music, I decided to discard it; this is meant only as an illustrative example. https://onlinesequencer.net/5393537

    Reply

  10. There are actually famous people who have their dreams “interpreted.” They claim this helps them learn more about themselves. But they say only their personal “dream interpreter” can tell them this. It’s clear what utter nonsense this is, because our unconscious mind dumps its trash in a haphazard jumble.

    That’s why you shouldn’t consume disturbing media (such as horror movies) right before going to sleep. Or following the negative news. You essentially carry these into your dreams. That makes sense, because I actually often dream about the content I hear through my headphones during the dream (e.g., with audiobooks).

    I, for example, mostly have bad dreams. If I even dream at all—which doesn’t exactly happen every day. In most of them, I chase after things unsuccessfully and/or have “lost” them forever. Most of the time, of course, these are women, because the night stands for the woman. One is, so to speak, groping in the dark.

    And these women seem to pursue me even into my dreams, as if they had unlimited access there to my “soul” (if such a thing even exists). They come from my past. 8 out of 10 dreams end “tragically.” In two cases, I’d rather keep dreaming than wake up. But these good dreams, as expected, aren’t about women.

    My worst nightmares are when women exert power over me (means I’m not a masochist). It’s like an illness you can’t shake off. They torment me—not physically, but emotionally. Strangely enough, I rarely have bad dreams about men. My God, I’m so glad I’m no longer exposed to these emotionally abusive women!

    Reply

  13. Interesting perspective on shifting public opinion—these trends are definitely worth watching as they evolve. On a different note, managing stress during such uncertain times is just as important. Many people are turning to massage therapy in Mississauga to relax and improve overall well-being. Clinics like Bristol offer professional care that really helps with both physical and mental stress.

    Reply

  14. Vote Casey Putsch in Ohio. Putsch is going to get a big vote, it could be closer than any pundit predicts.

    Brad, stay tuned.

    Reply

  15. What the (actual or alleged) “Nazi with terminal cancer” says—and the notorious Zionist video Jew Cohen, of course, immediately agrees with him completely—namely, “where love goes” (in reference to interracial relationships) should not be influenced from the outside, is of course complete BS, because this very current trend is the result of (presumably Jewish) constant media and political influence.

    Apart from the Hard-Celler Act, whose namesake was also Jewish and who thereby initiated the mass flooding of America with millions upon millions of brown people of every sort, social racial segregation was in fact also the result of (positive!) influence. So there is absolutely nothing “inevitable, irreversible, and unchangeable”!

    One more comment on Mr. Rudolf’s statement in his conversation with David Gahary (who presumably had a lung removed): There are indeed quite a number of private schools, colleges, and universities in Europe, though the offerings in history are somewhat limited.

    https://www.perplexity.ai/search/ce18b7c8-6108-43d4-a19a-c8c36e15eccf

    You can listen to an older interview with Kevin MacDonald here.
    https://www.davegahary.com/Guests/Kevin_MacDonald.html
    https://www.davegahary.com/Guests/Dave_Gahary.html

    Reply

  19. https://www.richardhanania.com/p/womens-tears-win-in-the-marketplace

    Unfortunately, Dan Bilzerian also succumbed to the adolescent temptation to impress Kim Iversen by boasting about the nine women he allegedly slept with in a single night. This makes him, mentally and emotionally speaking, a pseudo-man—even if he believes he has proven his “masculinity” precisely by doing so.

    As long as “men” feel the need to convince women of their oh-so-masculine qualities and try to impress them, they have outsourced the yardstick by which they measure themselves to women’s mouths. To believe that women do not sense and notice this external control is as naive as it is mentally immature. Women are, in fact, vastly superior to them when it comes to assessing their own “personality” (which they themselves apparently do not know).

    It also does no good to play the tough guy or the badass, because you cannot convincingly portray and/or feign something you are not out of inner conviction, as long as that conviction has not become completely and utterly second nature to you—that is, until it has become a fixed, deeply rooted part of your personality, character, and essence.

    They don’t lead; they are led—paraded around like a dancing bear in a circus ring. They have aligned their inner compass—indeed, their entire existence—with women as their sole and most important point of reference. They want to please and impress women, to win their favor and approval; thus, they have ultimately remained children, in need of praise from the unweaned mother figure.

    I believe men should embark en masse on an “inner and outer migration” and deny women any attention, practically starving and parching them to the point that they will cry out desperately for them, in the consciousness finally reawakened to how dependent they actually are on men.

    What women truly fear in men—like the devil fears holy water—and what simultaneously draws them irresistibly to men like an aphrodisiac, are not remote-controlled, physically mature boys, but thoughtful men who see through their little games and can explain and prove this with lightning-quick wit and irrefutable logic.

    We’re all familiar with the famous and widely circulated meme featuring a young man looking intently after a girl while his partner pulls a face of indignation. But what “complex,” unanalyzed, and—to this day—more or less unaddressed messages (not without reason, as they reveal social power dynamics) are hidden in this image?

    The main problem for the man when “flirting” is that it consists of two contradictory elements: the assertive “masculine” taking of the initiative, but at the same time the needy, that is, “feminine,” begging for a reaction, a response, affection, and attention from the “object of desire.”

    The man is thus demanding something very concrete here—a specific behavior from the woman, not the other way around—and is dependent on her cooperation and consent, which forces him into the position of a supplicant. It is no different with the infamous “marriage proposal.” Ultimately, women unquestioningly expect men to be willing to pay this price of self-sacrifice.

    As soon as the actual, underlying motivation for his actions—namely, the urge for sexual contact—becomes all too obvious, the fascination with his unattainability and aloofness is already lost for the man, and he has thus fallen into a trap of his own making, has already lost the cat-and-mouse game, and consequently loses his dignity, appeal, and self-respect.

    Can these schizophrenic elements be neatly decoupled and separated from one another, or at least mitigated and defused to some extent? At best, through equally contradictory, schizophrenic, paradoxical actions. The man must therefore be able to apply feminine techniques here in order to achieve his masculine goal.

    The only thing men want from women is, after all, perfectly clear, because if porn websites were replaced overnight by sites with titles like “Free non-sexual communication with women here!”, no one would visit them anymore (except perhaps a few castrated beta males who see themselves as comforters, understanding souls, caregivers, and white knights).

    However, these websites will never exist, because, first of all, women are generally uninterested in mere communication with men (just as men are with women) unless it constantly revolves around themselves and their “needs”; and second, women always prefer “communication” (or whatever they mean by that) with other women over communication with men.

    Perhaps that is why the opposite approach would be logical: to force women to hunt their own prey themselves, rather than simply casting out the fishing hook by dressing in a way that emphasizes their bodies until the guys “bite.” They should thus be put in a position where they have to do without this, so they realize that without it, they cannot survive in the “war of the sexes” at all!

    “Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the prettiest of them all?” A famous man once observed that a woman is made entirely of vanity. And her “trump card” lies between her thighs. Everything else is pure “decoration,” or rather: “distraction.” And that’s despite the fact that every other woman possesses the same trump card! It’s simply utterly ridiculous.

    So what advice should I give to young men who intend to assert themselves in the battle for reproductive rights in the marketplace of sexual vanity—a veritable minefield of “Me Too,” “invasion of privacy,” “sexual objectification,” “consensual sex,” and so on—while constantly facing suspicion of sexual harassment?

    We must use pure, cold, rational, unempathetic male logic to push them out of their “princess” status. Women are world champions at manipulation through feigned “emotions” (such as crying over trivial matters). Men, by contrast, are world champions at falling for it. So-called “catcalling,” for example, is such a clumsy, unimaginative, helpless display of empty-headedness that no man of honor would practice it.

    It’s about understanding the principles. That your happiness lies not in the outside world, but solely within. Should you recognize this, women will also be found who wish to partake in (or rather, parasitize) this charisma, this “laugh behind the eyes”—that is a law of nature. This requires no money, no showing off, but only a genuine, authentic, unaffected, natural, and self-assured personality.

    Here, audacity and highly creative tactics must go hand in hand, forming a fruitful symbiosis. If a woman in the supermarket catches your eye but snubbs you with a haughty look, then you casually position yourself near her with your back turned to her and say something like this out loud—as if thinking aloud—but loud enough for her to hear: “I’d never even gaze back at someone like you.”

    Then you walk away, and now you begin your game with her. Because you’ll notice that from now on she won’t take her eyes off you, since she’s thinking: “No guy has ever said anything so cheeky to me before!” Her insatiable vanity now compels her to “get to the bottom of this disturbingly interesting incident.” But for now, you ignore her as if she were thin air and doesn’t even exist. As if your head were full of other things.

    Wherever you go now, she’ll follow you “by chance,” bump into you, run into your arms, or show up completely out of the blue—because you’ve deeply shaken her pampered, self-obsessed vanity and superficial “self-confidence,” and that won’t tolerate any insult of this kind! She wants to make sure you could have seriously meant her, even though she’s already received ten compliments today and spent half an hour in front of the makeup mirror.

    In the line at the register, she stands behind you and makes herself noticeable (e.g., through touches that seem accidental or unintentional and physical intrusiveness that seems downright grotesque). Her eyes seek yours; you are now “inexplicably interesting” to her. She tucks her hair behind her ear with her hand, which carries an unconscious message: “I am desirable and have silky hair!” Now you smile back hesitantly for the first time, thereby rewarding her effort.

    Reply

  20. Well, (specific) women “love” Bilzerian’s MONEY—
    otherwise, there’s absolutely nothing about him!

    He isn’t even capable of responding with a clear head to
    Piers Morgan’s well-placed “accusation” that he is a Nazi.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Emil Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*