Chicago, IL – it’s late August here in Chicago. The Chicago Cubs are 31 games under .500, 29 1/2 games out of first place. Even dire hard Chicago Cub fans have sadly, come to the realization that….
This wasn’t the year.
The last time the Chicago Cubs won any baseball championship was 1945 – the year we dropped the A bomb on Japan; all of the able bodied, young American men were in military uniforms, not in Chicago Cubs uniforms. It was a 4F, old men season, maybe there will be another one… next year. There’s always next year for Cubs fans.
In a similar vein, this was not the year that Ron Paul or any other Liberatrian, economic conservative broke through and was elected President of the United States – Ron Paul will not be ending the welfare state, reversing the Great Society, the New Deal, ending Medicaid and Social Security, privatizing the entire US public school system, enacting right to work laws in all 50 states, breaking the Teamsters Union, the UAW, the United Mine Workers Union and allowing “American” businesses to hire and fire whoever they want, with wages determined by “free markets”, and the American labor force opened up to 2 billion 3rd world workers, under Libertarian free market principles of open borders immigration.
Ron Paul and his never say die Libertarian supporters made a valiant effort to reach out to Blacks, Hispanics, even Muslim immigrants associated with Al Qaeda 9-11-01 terrorists. Ron Paul was the only GOP presidential candidate to back the Ground Zero Mosque and explain that the 9-11-01 mass murder of our people was an understandable Islamic response to the USA’s mistreatment of the Palestinians and the US having military bases in Saudi Arabia.
All of Ron Paul’s outreach/pandering to Muslim immigrants didn’t result in winning Ron Paul the nomination. Neither did Ron Paul’s pledge to set free all Black African Americans in prison for trafficking in hard drugs like crack cocaine and heroin. Ron Paul and other Libertarian economic Conservatives were polling less than 1 percent amongst Black voters… maybe these Black voters haven’t read enough Austrian free market economics books… or maybe they don’t read any books.
Yeah, this wasn’t the year for Libertarian, economic conservative Presidential candidates or the Chicago Cubs.
American nationalist leader George Rockwell stated in 1966 that Libertarian/economic conservative Presidential candidates were doomed to fail. After the ’64 Goldwater debacle, Rockwell stated with 100 percent assurance that no Libertarian economic conservative Presidential candidate would ever win the support of poor and working class White voters.
But, 45 years later we’ve had to suffer the failures of Jack Kemp, Phil Graham, Steve Forbes, Ron Paul and other Libertarian Party Presidential candidates that no one can remember.
Who ran as the Libertarian Presidential candidate in 1992? Who was the second string catcher for the 1977 Chicago Cubs? Who cares?
No this wasn’t the year for the Chicago Cubs or Libertarian, economic conservative Preidential candidates.
Oh well, there’s always next year. This is for sure….. they’ll be back.
“Would a libertarian candidate be more appealing to you if he promised to provide subsidies for cheap beer and chips for you Average Joes? Would that sauce it up enough for you? How about if they made the banks provide sub prime loans to you guys so that you could buy dually pickups and bass boats that you can’t afford? That’s pretty saucy.”
Absolutely not. I am wholly in favor of limited government. What I mean by “sauce” is some kind of overarching thesis besides “your rights end at my nose.” “Sauce” is cultural skin in the game. In other words, I want to see a people, with values and expectations as any people, and a government that reflects those values.
We have now what amounts to a libertarian government on social issues. There is not an argument anyone can make that could force government to recognize anyone’s white Christian cultural values. That is what I want. That is what the average Joe wants. You’ll notice I wasn’t referring to financially average. I was referring to IQ.
I am a man of the people. We the people gather together and form governments that respect our cultural history and folkways. That is the purpose of government. We the people don’t gather together and form “whatever” governments based on theory. Is that not what we have now?
The difference between theory and culture is “sauce.” And Libertarians ain’t got none.
“If Woodrow Wilson’s eugenics program had succeeded, we probably wouldn’t NEED as much government as we have today.”
This is patently and demonstrably false. Blacks were far better behaved before Libertarian culture took hold. Whites had a culture that controlled blacks, Government reflected that culture and enforced those mores. Totally non-Libertarian.
Chopin’s “Funeral March” seems appropriate:
LandShark: Brother Woodrow had a lot more than niggers in mind when he started promoting eugenics. He wanted to do away with dimwitted Whites, also.
Wilson removed niggers from government jobs and segregated the armed forces. He and Margaret Sanger had plans to exterminate the entire race in America. Guess who got in the way? Yeah, good old goodhearted dipshit Christians.
Sanger’s legacy, Planned Parenthood, has aborted 15 million nigger sprog since the 1970’s. Without them, we would probably have trice as many niggers as we presently have.
At the present time we have Christians are sponsoring Somalians and bringing them into White towns all over the country. Christians are the major proponents of amnesty for illegal aliens.
Christians are more of curse than a blessing when it comes to preserving White culture.
I have long wondered why people think Christians are the backbone of our culture. The Yankee cities in the Northeast may have been top heavy with Christians, but the majority of the cities in this land when American culture was being established had more saloons and whorehouses than they had churches. Godless heathens such as myself have always been the majority here in the new world.
You overbearing rule mongers are the reason so many people fled the Republican party when its leaders declared that they represented the moral majority.
You people are not the cure for a sick society; you are the cause.
By the way, LandShark, I think you’d be a lot happier spending your time on Glenn Beck’s TV and radio programs. You can cheerlead when he talks about God and MLK. You can put your hand over your heart when they play the Star Spangled Banner and look at that damn Yankee flag with tears of yearning in their eyes.
Yeah, you and Glenn. Good match.
“Godless heathens such as myself have always been the majority here in the new world.”
I love where I live. One of the most unchurched states in the nation. Hunting, fishing, skiing, and good surf too. A good place for pagans.
PRB “plays” reality, and morality, backwards:
“Brother Woodrow had a lot more than niggers in mind (…) wanted to do away with dimwitted Whites, also. (…) He and Margaret Sanger had plans to exterminate (…) Guess who got in the way? Yeah, good old goodhearted dipshit Christians. (…) Christians are more of curse than a blessing when it comes to preserving White culture. I have long wondered why people think Christians are the backbone of our culture. (…) Godless heathens such as myself have always been the majority here in the new world. You overbearing rule mongers (…) not the cure for a sick society; you are the cause.”
More drinkhouses and whorehouses and no more pestilence of Christianity would be healthy, then? This fits and reinforces perfectly the stereotype view that many have of white racialists, including southern nationalist white racialists!
“Brother” Woodrow, indeed. Slaughterer, militariser and corrupter of our grandfathers and great grandfathers. Taxer to this day of most of our income. Federal reserver of our money to this day. Complicit in the “eugenic” murder of millions and millions of Nordic white fetuses to this day. A white Obama.
But “this wasn’t the year” (as Jack says) — to overthrow his legacy!
I forgot to mention pioneer of the unification of nations and nationalities, opponent of Russian anti-Bolsheviks, brutal punisher of the Germans, etc.
Christianity is the indispenable foundation of white civilisation. All other ground is shifting sand. Agnosticism is practical atheism, godless amorality is immorality.
Gott ist liebe.
Typo: “indispenable” should have been: indispensable. Omission of translation: God is love. Don’t look down on “good-heartedness,” PRB.
Mosin Nagant:
Christianity was NOT the religion of the indigenous White tribes of Europe. It was not until the Romans conquered and indoctrinated them into that Middle Eastern gibberish at the point of a sword that many of them abandoned their native belief systems.
All of the trouble that Whites face in the world today can be traced back to the Middle East and the hair brained religions that were invented there.
You should probably go tune in to Glenn Beck with LandShark. Both of you sound just like that fuzzy-brained Negrophile.
Mosin Nagant: Actually, the common stereotype of a Southern racialist always includes some reference to BIBLE THUMPING.
Also, take a moment to think about the particular bloodlines of those murdered Nordic fetuses that you are so worried about. One trait in that those bloodlines is the eager willingness to murder unborn children. It is only fitting and poetic that those bloodlines should end at the abortion clinic.
Even though Good Brother Woodrow reluctantly signed the bill that created the federal income tax into law the second time it was placed before him, he is still my favorite president by far. If he and Good Sister Margaret had not been prevented from fulfilling their plan by Christian morons, the good folks in an all-White Detroit would still be enjoying life in the Paris of the Midwest, churning out cars and raking in the loot.
It’s odd that you profess to be an authority on Woodrow Wilson, but you never stumbled upon the information that he was both racist and xenophobic. We could use a man like that in the White House now.
“It’s odd that you profess to be an authority on Woodrow Wilson, but you never stumbled upon the information that he was both racist and xenophobic. We could use a man like that in the White House now.”
Whatever his other characters might have been there is no excusing Wilson for promising to keep us out of the suicidal White war in Europe in his bid for a second term of office in 1916 while all the while he had been and (continued to) maneuver us into that war. A war of White upon White genocide in which American troops, once they were engaged, died at the same appalling rate that British, French, and German had and did. On top of that his addle-brained and ineffectual efforts in post war diplomacy helped substantially in laying the groundwork for WWII.
Rudel: If you are referring to the Versailles Treaty as the groundwork that Wilson laid for WWII, you need to research the convoluted evolution of that treaty. Research Wilson’s “Fourteen Points” and compare that to the treaty that congress eventually passed.
As for getting us into WWI, there is absolutely no evidence to support a belief that Wilson was anything but sincere in his efforts to keep us out of WWI. Sinking our ships and sinking British ships carrying American passengers were definitely proper grounds for going to war with Germany. When you add in the Germans’ attempt to ally themselves with Mexico to proceed against America and you have apt grounds for everything that happened to them in that war.
By the way, Rudel, do you have any thoughts on which way Germany will lean when all of the big kids start throwing stones?
Wilson was fckedover by his Senate though. They refused to ratify his policy or treaties. Had the US been a bit more engaged in the 1920s and used some of it’s muslce to make a few demands with Germany I doubt things would have spiralled
out of control. Just a few things here and there.
Germany btw, was responsible for the Bolsheviks seizing power in Russia. Which is a cosmic tragedy. And it’s all Ludendorf and Hindenburg at fault. They let Lenin pass through their lines to St Petersburg. WTF was the German high command thinking?
“Had the US been a bit more engaged in the 1920s and used some of it’s muslce to make a few demands with Germany”
More demands!?! They had already ruined the German economy, stripped it of real estate, and imposed enormous repatriation debts on them.
I hope you are not arguing that somehow Germany was in any way more guilty than France or the especially devious and duplicitous English in starting the war.
“Sinking our ships and sinking British ships carrying American passengers were definitely proper grounds for going to war with Germany.”
And were any of those ships not carrying illegal munitions and other war contraband deep in their holds?
Demands that may have favoured Germany too, don’t forget that possibility. The US could make demands on France, Britain, Italy as a creditor.
Exactly how did Britain act with duplicity before ww1?
There was a formal entente with France. A deal made out in the Open.
Attack France and the British will jump in. Any fool could see that was a real risk.
It might not have been worth the bother but Germany must have understood the eventual consequence of invading France (+Belgium).
Rudel: Who really knows what a ship is hauling? I would guess, however, that if there was a profit to be made by either smuggling weapons or hauling them with the blessing of certain members of the U.S. government that those ships were loaded top to bottom with weapons. After all, Great Britain was one of our trading partners and we had no agreement with Germany NOT to sell weapons to the Brits.
There is also the possibility that private American citizens were covertly making a dime off the war over there.
In 2004 I did some business with a guy in Coffee County, GA who shipped old COE semi trucks to Viet Nam. I provided several dozen of them to him. The only criteria was that two of the trucks had to fit face to face in a tall 40 foot cargo container.
The trucks were too tall to fit in the taller variety of containers unless you took the tires off. After you loaded the trucks inside, you strapped all of the tires onto pallets and loaded the pallets side by side onto the frame of the truck, totally blocking access to the front of the container.
After I got to know the guy better, he let me in on the soft contraband scheme he had going. The cabs and sleepers of both trucks and a big box that was sitting on the frame of the front truck, which was backed into the container, were filled with car parts. New shit from all the discount parts stores. Lots of starters and carburetor rebuilding kits and that sort of thing. Stuff that apparently wasn’t part of the trade agreement that we had with Viet Nam in ’04.
Those Georgia boys would drop that stuff of at the Port of Jacksonville, the lazy Customs folks would open the container, see all of the work involved in actually inspecting the contents, then close the doors and attach the seal. Same thing every time.
Like I said, who really knows what a ship is hauling?
PBR, of course I know about Woodrow’s racism and “xenophobia” (not that remarkable for a politician back in the heyday of the Klan in all states and Jim Crow in the south) but he did work against white interests. I know Beck and the Beckites blame everything on his Progressivism, but don’t confuse my position with theirs.
Re: “Christianity was NOT the religion of the indigenous White tribes of Europe. It was not until the Romans conquered and indoctrinated them into that Middle Eastern gibberish at the point of a sword that many of them abandoned their native belief systems. All of the trouble that Whites face in the world today can be traced back to the Middle East and the hair brained religions that were invented there”:
You reinforce and fit the stereotype of the neo-pagan, “post-Christian,” even radical anti-Christian white racialist. Sadly, the “public image” of white racial and cultural preservation is NOT of the truly conservative church-going Christians that many are; there may be a majority of religion-clingers (or Bible “thumpers” as you call them) but it is the infidels who are most recognised.
As I read the article I noted that the writer was not in touch with reality. That being said, I disagree with the presumption that anyone who espoused an opinion was not a Libertarian.
From the article”explain that the 9-11-01 mass murder of our people was an understandable Islamic response to the USA’s mistreatment of the Palestinians and the US having military bases in Saudi Arabia.” NOBODY said it was understandable.
Is there another explanation?Please tell me where I can find a different explanation. The islamaniacs on 9-11-01 had zero chance of success were it not for the federal government demanding that we appease hijackers.
Bush knew that the islamaniacs planned this event and kept it under wraps but some sick individuals would rather call out and blame Libertarians for noticing what it was that the islamaniacs used an excuse for attacking. Our rights were then attacked by Bush and the GOP with the passage of the unconstitutional patriot act.
Which is worse? The observation of Libertarians or the usurpation of our rights? According to the writer the former is worse than the latter. Typical GOP spin
No. But this just might be the year for both. Let’s call it the Audacity of Hope 😉