Next On The White Power Chopping Block: Daryle Lamont Jenkins

Daryle Lamont Jenkins of One People’s Project ordered to pay $50,000 in damages to David Yeagley

Oklahoma

OD was at the aborted 2010 American Renaissance conference which was cancelled at the last minute due to the actions of Jeffrey Imm of R.E.A.L. and Daryle Lamont Jenkins of One People’s Project.

The Amren conference was later moved to Charlotte in 2011 where it was similarly cancelled due to pressure from anti-racist groups. In 2012 and 2013, the Amren conference found a new home at Montgomery Bell State Park near Dickson, TN where it was carried out successfully in spite of anti-racist demonstrations.

According to Kyle Bristow, Daryle Lamont Jenkins was ordered by an Oklahoma court this morning to pay David Yeagley, one of the speakers who was scheduled to attend the 2010 Amren conference, $50,000 in damages for violating his civil rights:

“Yeagley’s motion for summary judgment was filed on December 3, 2013, and Jenkins did not file a responsive brief to it.  During the morning of January 3, 2014, a hearing on the motion occurred, and the judge granted it:  Jenkins has been ordered by a court of law to pay Yeagley $50,000.00 for shutting down the 2010 American Renaissance conference. …”

Note: Until recently, DLJ was listed as the co-host of the next anti-racist protest at the 2014 Amren conference on April 26th, also at Montgomery Bell State Park, which is being organized by the “Tennessee Anti-Racist Network.” This court judgement seem to have already dampened his enthusiasm for harassing Amren.

Perhaps DLJ will now fade into obscurity like Jeffrey Imm. The League of the South should consider taking legal action against the ‘Tennessee Anti-Racist Network’ for getting our hotel reservations cancelled in Shelbyville.

About Hunter Wallace 12367 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

18 Comments

  1. Will he appeal the judgment now? They might do so in spite of legal expense, and They do have very deep pockets reaching ultimately into ours. Can WNs really ever hope to out-lawyer The ‘Lawyers’?

  2. ‘The League of the South should consider taking legal action against the “Tennessee Anti-Racist Network” for getting our hotel reservations cancelled in Shelbyville’

    How about those ‘little’ free speech permission fees that ONLY YOUR GROUP had to pay, to stand in a small space along a street for a short time, while the opposition went untrammeled at no charge?

  3. Anglo-Protestant, I visited your blog, based on the strength of your comment on the other thread. Very good, interesting articles there. I recommend it!

  4. Mosin.

    Jenkins will probably not appeal. the only time he actually did anything in the case, he hurt his case. In this case our side is outlawyering theirs. Yeagley will probly never collect on the judgment, but it seems to have discouraged Jenkins.

  5. “Anglo-Protestant, I visited your blog, based on the strength of your comment on the other thread. Very good, interesting articles there. I recommend it!”

    Really? I find it a font of disinformation. Whether it is the half-baked opinion of some 19th Century Southern writer writing about events that happened two hundred years before his time or that ill-informed rant about the nature of Anglo-Saxons and Celts that he recently posted.

    The British Isles show a distinct east to west cline in the increasing frequency of R1b (Celtic) v. R1a (Germanic) Y-chromosomes among its inhabitants. Some 60%+ of the indigenous population shows R1a in areas like Northumberland, Norfolk, and Yorkshire due no doubt to the prevalence of norse genes from the era of the Danelaw ranging up to 80% R1b in the Aran Islands and far Wales, Cornwall, and remote Scottish Islands.

    The average Englishman is approximately 50% indigenous Briton. The Angles, Saxons, and Jutes did not so much intermarry as they did conquer and take the wives of dead Brythonic warriors but their numbers were low enough not to have a replacement effect on the native population except in the matter of language. The Viking raiders arrived in sufficient numbers and intermarried heavily. The Normans conquered and ruled but seem to have married mostly among themselves and as aristocratic warriors had low fertility rates, their chief influence being in imposing French language and laws.

    The Scotii are a Gaelic tribe from Ireland that conquered and intermarried and/or wiped out the Picts in the 5th and 6th centuries and then with some mongrel English borderers were banished to Northern Ireland from whence they originally came in the 17th and early 18th Centuries before they were unceremoniously cleared from their land and sent to America, Australia and elsewhere as indentured servants with sentences of slavery commonly lasting seven years.

    As you see, the ubiquitous term “Anglo-Saxon” is something of a misnomer when it comes to describe the English. To apply it to Scots or Welshmen is just plain wrong.

  6. “half-baked opinion of some 19th Century Southern writer”

    The explicitly expressed ethnic identification of Jefferson Davis, Alexander Hamilton Stephens, Robert Barnwell Rhett and Robert E Lee are now half baked opinions.

    The 20th century novel by Margret Mitchell who is the descendant of 19th century immigrants is God’s holy truth. The world turned upside down.

    “The British Isles show a distinct east to west cline in the increasing frequency of R1b (Celtic) v. R1a (Germanic) Y-chromosomes among its inhabitants. Some 60%+ of the indigenous population shows R1a in areas like Northumberland, Norfolk, and Yorkshire due no doubt to the prevalence of norse genes from the era of the Danelaw ranging up to 80% R1b in the Aran Islands and far Wales, Cornwall, and remote Scottish Islands.”

    Many Germans have R1b DNA. Are they not real Germans? Are Irishmen with Y-Chromsomes of Normans or Vikings not real Irishmen? This is about blood descent from foundation myths, not Y-Chromosomes. An oral or written history one can trace back. Our ancestors knew nothing of Y-Chromosomes they weren’t basing their ethnic identity on that.

    “The Scotii are a Gaelic tribe from Ireland that conquered and intermarried and/or wiped out the Picts in the 5th and 6th centuries”

    True. What is also true is the traditional term used by Scottish Highlanders for Lowlanders is “Sassenach” which means “Saxon.”

    http://www.scotland.com/forums/human-rights-scotland/22400-english-scottish-people-5.html

    Thank you for kind words Mosin. I’m going to have some dandy quotes for you from Robert E Lee pertaining to religion soon that you can throw up into the faces of these uppity folks when they give you trouble.

    P.S. Sorry Hunter that my return has caused all these folks to high jack your threads. I’m very popular with these descendants of 19th century immigrants who don’t much like the way 19th and 20th century Southerners spoke of themselves.

  7. Thanks to link for Anglo American. Still, some word needs to be found for what was made into a slur (“wasp”) and “anglo” is such a latin-imposed type word, too. You always feel like mexicans (italian, portuguese, spanish…latins) are the ones talking about you, when you hear it. Northwest european protestant is helpful but long-winded, and “settler peoples” and even “children of the founders,” or “descendants of the founders,” seems overly quaint maybe. Although “children of the founders” with “wasps” in parentheses, has the word “children,” which always tugs the heartstrings and does point out the reality of the founding group (so sadly voiceless today). I do trust Englishmen to come up with something new.

  8. Oh— I hope Mr. Yeagley gets the money the courts awarded him. If he doesn’t, what use are courts?

  9. Didn’t One P.P. recently disband changing their name to something like TORCH? Probably motivated by this court decision.

  10. I remember now. It is ARA which has changed their name. Perhaps the above post should be canceled.

  11. Yes, Dixiegirl, let’s work on finding the best, short and accurate term for the descendants of original, Northwest European, mostly Anglo-Celtic or English or British, NON-RC, colonial settlers.

    Anglo-Saxon Protestant, I look forward to your quote selections. Grow your blog!

    Re: the post topic: I agree with FB.

  12. This suggests a tactic: go to some public forum and then let the left attempt to shut you down. But it’s an ambush. Because now you can bring a lawsuit for violation of your civil rights (or whatever).

    You’d have to back this up:
    * Have a legal team ready to roll.
    * Record the event on video to get evidence. You can also use this on the internet as agitprop to show the intolerance of the left.
    * Get allies. Find some conservative or even civil liberties group which would support you as a test case.
    * It even may be feasible for you to get a local branch of the government to back you up, say a district attorney who is sympathetic and spoiling for a fight.

    Think in terms of the civil disobedience tactics the civil rights movement used against the South in the 1950s/60s: mass your forces, get the other side to over-react, then present yourself in the media as standing for your rights against the forces of oppression.

    And yes, the mainstream media may be hopeless, but there is plenty of alternative media out there.

    Above all, attack the contradictions:
    * The left claims to stand for tolerance, but is intolerant.
    * The government claims to support civil rights, make them live up to the claim by defending your First Amendment rights.
    * DWLs claim that Southern Nationalists are against civil rights, but here you are standing up for Free Speech…and by extension, of the civil rights for many Americans who are being disenfranchised.

    All this might require a little preparation and a lot of planning, but the payoff can be great.

  13. Minor quibble, but R1a is usually associated with Slavic peoples, where it can be as high as 50 or 60% in Poland and Russia. R1a is found amongst Germans and Scandinavians, but it’s a much smaller percentage. And Anglo-American Protestant is correct that R1-b is predominant amongst Germans, just like the British.

    In terms of genetic distance, Celtic and Germanic peoples are virtually neighbors, and even the Romans had a hard time identifying which tribes in Europe were Celtic or Germanic. Modern historians themselves have often reassessed the ethnic identity of European tribes, since Celts and Germans are culturally and ethnically similar.

    So in summary, yes the British are predominantly indigenous, but their indigenous ancestors are closely related to the founding stock of the Germanic peoples.

Comments are closed.